Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Individual-, household- and community-level determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia

  • Girmay Tsegay Kiross ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    girmshe@gmail.com, Girmay.kiross@uon.edu.au

    Affiliations Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia, Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

  • Catherine Chojenta,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

  • Daniel Barker,

    Roles Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

  • Deborah Loxton

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Introduction

People living in the same area share similar determinants of infant mortality, such as access to healthcare. The community’s prevailing norms and attitudes about health behaviours could also influence the health care decisions made by individuals. In diversified communities like Ethiopia, differences in child health outcomes might not be due to variation in individual and family characteristics alone, but also due to differences in the socioeconomic characteristics of the community where the child lives. While individual level characteristics have been examined to some extent, almost all studies into infant mortality conducted in Ethiopia have failed to consider the impact of community-level characteristics. Therefore, this study aims to identify individual and community level determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia.

Method

Data from the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey in 2016 were used for this study. A total of 10641 live births were included in this analysis. A multi-level logistic regression analysis was used to examine both individual and community level determinants while accounting for the hierarchal structure of the data.

Results

Individual-level characteristics such as infant sex have a statistically significant association with infant mortality. The odds of infant death before one year was 50% higher for males than females (AOR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.25–2.20; p-value <0.001). At the community level, infants from pastoralist areas (Somali and Afar regions) were 1.4 more likely die compared with infants living in the Agrarian area such as Amhara, Tigray, and Oromia regions; AOR = 1.44; 95% CI; 1.02–2.06; p-value = 0.039).

Conclusion

Individual, household and community level characteristics have a statistically significant association with infant mortality. In addition to the individual based interventions already in place, household and community-based interventions such as focusing on socially and economically disadvantaged regions in Ethiopia could help to reduce infant mortality.

Introduction

The IMR is an essential national indicator of health because it is very sensitive to general structural elements, particularly to socio-economic development and basic living conditions [1]. It is also an essential measure of women’s and children’s wellbeing [2]. The IMR is a proxy measure of population health [3]. It can also indicate the health status of women, the quality of and access to healthcare services, public health practices and socio-economic conditions in any given population [4]. A high IMR may also indicate lack of proper care for children due to poverty, lack of parents’ education and societal preferences (such as the preference for a male child) [5]. In Ethiopia, infant mortality is an important public health problem, where 48 per 1000 live births have resulted in death during the first year of life in 2016 [6]. To attain SDG 3, infant mortality has to reduce substantially, because it accounts for 75% of all under-5 mortality [7].

In Ethiopia, a number of recent studies have been conducted on the determinants of infant mortality. For example, a matched case–control study in south-west Ethiopia in 2012, focusing on a handful of communities (mostly small rural districts), found that antenatal care (ANC) follow-up, handwashing with soap before feeding children, birth size, the mother’s perception of modern medical treatments, birth order and preceding birth interval were determinants of infant mortality [8]. Another research project conducted at the institutional level in northern Ethiopia showed that the death of an infant in early age was associated with low birth weight, low breastfeeding practice and maternal complications [9]. However, the study ignored the impact of socio-economic determinants in relation to infant mortality, which limits the applicability of the results on a large scale. Furthermore, a number of recent studies have investigated the determinants of infant mortality at the national level. For example, national studies conducted using EDHS data in 2000, 2005 and 2016 found that the mother’s age, mother’s level of education, child birth order, source of drinking water and sex of the infant had statistically significant associations with infant mortality [10, 11]. However, several of these studies have assumed the independence of individual-, household- and community-level factors, and researchers have not considered the clustered nature of EDHS data.

The sampling procedure in the EDHS is multistage cluster sampling, by which individuals were nested in clusters and infant mortality be correlated with these clusters [6]. This violates the assumption of independence, which could introduce a serious bias in programmatic implementation, implying that contextual variables are not considered in the study. Contextual variables such as the classification of respondents’ residence (as urban or rural) allow researchers to study how a wide range of surrounding characteristics may influence health and wellbeing. For example, researchers have found that geographical access to health care has an effect on infant mortality [12].

An analytical study in developing countries has indicated that infant mortality is affected by several community-level determinants, such as the community’s level of education, geographical isolation, poverty rate, community access to skilled maternal health services, area of residence and the presence of community media [13]. Evidence also suggests that the community in which a child is born determines their survival status [1416]. In a synthesis of health survey data from 28 countries, it was shown that being a member of specific families and communities determined the child’s survival in SSA countries, implying that the socio-economic characteristics of the community in which the infant resides are important determinants of infant mortality [17, 18]. In a national study in Malawi, it was found that there was variation in child mortality at the household and community levels; it was shown that infant mortality varied by 18% when community-level characteristics were added to individual-level characteristics [19]. In a nationally representative cross-sectional study of 28,647 live births in Nigeria also showed that 16.7% of the variance in the risks of infant mortality across community level characteristics [20].

While several studies on infant mortality have been conducted in Ethiopia, many of these have given more attention to the influence of individual-level attributes (characteristics of infants and mothers) and less to the community-level determinants of infant mortality [2123]. Individuals within a community share similar resources due to most public services being spatially organised into clusters; this may determine the health of individuals who live in that community [17]. It is widely acknowledged that differences in child health outcomes might not be due to variation only in family characteristics, but in the socio-economic characteristics of the community in which the child lives [24, 25]. Infant mortality might vary at the community level due to variations in access to the nearest health and educational institutions, means of communication and the number of households with electricity, piped water and sewers [26]. People living in the same area share some of the major determinants of infant mortality, such as access to water, sanitation and health care. A community’s prevailing norms and attitudes about health behaviours can also influence the healthcare decisions made by individuals [27].

Most of the studies conducted in Ethiopia have not considered community-level determinants of infant mortality [8, 10, 21]. However, studies conducted in diversified communities such as Ethiopia should take into account the variation at the community level to address the high rate of infant mortality in the nation. That is, individual-, household- and community-level factors need to be considered to ascertain the relative importance of interventions on child health. This study aims to identify individual-, household- and community-level determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia using data from the 2016 EDHS. Based on previous research, it is expected that both individual- and community-level characteristics will be significantly associated with infant mortality.

Materials and methods

Study area and setting

The source of data for this study was the 2016 EDHS. The data were downloaded from the MEASURE DHS website (www.meauredhs.com). The survey covered all nine regions and two city administrations of Ethiopia.

Study design and sampling

The survey design of the 2016 EDHS was cross-sectional, and survey participants were selected through a stratified two-stage cluster sampling technique. The full details of the methods and procedures of data collection in the EDHS have been published elsewhere [28]. The survey collected information from a nationally representative sample of 16,650 households, including 15,683 women aged 15–49 years. The study population for the present study was 10,641 children who had been born in the 5 years preceding the survey, nested within 645 communities across the country. EDHS data collection took place from 18 January 2016 to 27 June 2016.

Study variables

Outcome variable.

The outcome variable for this study was whether a child had died before celebrating their first birthday by the time of interview with their parent.

Explanatory variables.

These are the characteristics of a community or cluster. A community comprises of people living in a particular area or in a common location. In the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and health survey programmes, the primary sampling units (PSU) are considered as proxies for communities or clusters [6]. (See Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Description and measurement of individual-, household- and community-level exposure variables.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t001

Data analysis

Descriptive analysis.

Sampling weights were applied to adjust for the disproportionate allocation of the sample to the nine regions and two city administrations as well as the sample difference between urban and rural areas [6]. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and proportions were calculated after applying these sampling weights.

Multivariable multilevel analysis.

The EDHS used a multistage cluster sampling technique, whereby data were hierarchical (i.e., mothers and infants were nested within households, and households were nested within clusters). Considering the hierarchical nature of EDHS data, mothers and infants who lived within the same cluster may have had similar characteristics to other mothers and infants compared to those in other parts of the country. Considering the clustered sampling approach, a two-stage multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the effects of individual-household- and community-level determinants on infant mortality. Backward stepwise multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to select individual-, household- and community-level variables to each model and those variables with p-value > 0 .25 were removed.

The fixed effect sizes of individual-, household- and community-level determinants on infant mortality were expressed as AORs with 95% confidence intervals. A p value of .05 was used as the cut-off for statistical significance. Additionally, the measure of variance (random effects) was reported in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient [35] and proportional change in variance [36].

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Newcastle (Reference no.: H-2018-0386), and an approval letter for the use of the EDHS data set was gained from MEASURE DHS. No information obtained from the data set was disclosed to any third party.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

The general characteristics of the study population are shown in Tables 24. Approximately 11,023 women who had given birth to a child in the 5 years preceding the survey in Ethiopia, living in 643 different communities, were interviewed to obtain information on under-5 mortality. More than half of the women interviewed were aged 25–34 years, only 7.1% had attended secondary education or above, and more than half had not been employed in their lifetime. The majority of their partners were engaged in agricultural activities for employment, and only 12% of the men attended secondary education or above. A quarter of the women were first married at an aged less than 15 years old, and 89% were living in a rural area. The majority of the women gave birth to the index child when they were aged 20–34 years; approximately 10% of the women gave birth when before the age of 20. Nearly half of the households were poor, and the majority of the heads of households were men (see Tables 25).

thumbnail
Table 2. Individual-level characteristics of the study population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Maternal healthcare service utilisation characteristics for the index child in Ethiopia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Household-level characteristics of the study population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Community-level characteristics of the study population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t005

Determinants of infant mortality

The fixed effects in Model II show the associations between infant mortality and individual-and household-level characteristics when the community-level covariates were not considered, while the fixed effects of Model IV show the associations between infant mortality and individual-household- and community-level determinants. After entering individual-household- and community-level characteristics into Model IV, infant sex was observed to have a significant association with infant mortality; the odds of death before 1 year are approximately 66% higher in male than in female infants, AOR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.25, 2.20], p < .001. Infants of multiple births had approximately six times greater odds of dying before the age of 1 month, AOR = 5.8, 95% CI [3.63, 9.37], p < .001.

In addition to child characteristics that were observed to influence infant survival, certain maternal characteristics were also shown to be associated with child survival within the first year of life. Mothers’ health-seeking behaviours, such as prenatal care, were significantly associated with infant mortality. Infants of mothers who received ANC during the last pregnancy were 50% less likely to die in their first year of life compared with infants whose mothers did not receive ANC, AOR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.33, 0.77], p = .002 (see Table 6).

thumbnail
Table 6. Fixed effects models of infant mortality, using multilevel logistic regression of individual-household- and community-level determinants associated with infant mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t006

In addition to the individual-level characteristics, community-level characteristics (such as the ways of life in the regions in Ethiopia) were significantly associated with infant mortality. Infants living in pastoralist regions (Somali and Afar) were 1.4 times more likely to die in their first year compared with infants living in agrarian regions (Amhara; Tigray; Oromia; and Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Region [SNNPR]), AOR = 1.40, 95% CI [1.02, 2.06], p = .039 (see Table 6). Furthermore, after adding the individual- household- and community-level characteristics into Model IV, the variation in the odds of infant mortality between communities was statistically significant with σ2 = 0.18, p = .004. An intraclass correlation coefficient estimated from Model IV indicated that 5.4% of the variability in infant mortality was attributable to differences between community characteristics, and the proportional change in variance from Model I to Model IV was 65.2% (see Table 7).

thumbnail
Table 7. Cluster-level random intercept models (measure of variation) of infant mortality, using multilevel logistic regression analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248501.t007

Discussion

The rate of infant mortality in Ethiopia is one of the highest in the world. According to the 2016 EDHS, 1 in every 21 children in Ethiopia die before celebrating their first birthday [28]. Several studies have been conducted on the determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia [8, 10, 21]; however, most have focused on individual determinants only. The present study included individual-, household- and community-level determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia. The findings from this study indicate that infant sex, multiple pregnancies, number of adverse pregnancy events and ANC are some of the key individual characteristics associated with infant mortality. Beyond these individual characteristics, community characteristics and the region in which an infant lives are also significantly associated with infant mortality.

In this study, infant mortality was higher for boys than for girls; which is the case in most parts of the world [37]. The sex difference was most prominent in the neonatal period [37]. Cross-sectional studies in Ethiopia have reported that male infants are at higher risk of death than female infants; the odds of female infant death are about 20% lower than the odds of male infant death. In another cross-sectional study in Ethiopia, it was shown that the risk of infant mortality was 38% higher among male neonates compared with female neonates [3841]. This has been explained by sex differences in genetic and biological make-up, with boys being biologically weaker and more susceptible to diseases and premature death [37]. In a study of 75 pooled surveys conducted in 31 countries in SSA, it was reported there were sex differences in mortality among infants [37]. However, other studies have indicated that mortality is higher among girls than boys [42, 43]. The role of harmful traditional practices, such as female genital mutilation, might contribute to the higher female mortality rate; the WHO has reported that female genital mutilation can lead to both immediate and long-term complications [44]. A cross-sectional study of urban Somali on the relationship between female genital mutilation and child mortality indicated that female mortality exceeded male mortality [45]. Another reason for the high rate of infant mortality in females compared with males may be due to sex preference. For families in Asia and Africa, a preferred preference for sons is common [46]. For some families, sons are preferred as they have a higher wage-earning capacity (especially in agrarian economies) and can take care of parents in the later age [47]. For example, in a study from a national survey in India on child gender and parental investment, researchers found that boys received an average of 10% more time and care from their parents than girls did [48]. Another study on Gender and cross-cultural dynamics in Ethiopia also presented that only 20.7% of the study percipients preferred female children [49].

In this study, we found that multiple-birth infants were at higher risk of death compared to singleton births. Multiple births are at high risk for numerous negative birth outcomes, and these outcomes contribute to a higher rate of mortality during the infancy [50, 51]. Different studies have shown that the rate of multiple births in Ethiopia ranges from 14.4 to 37.7 per 1000 deliveries [5254]. A cross-sectional study in Ethiopia and Zimbabwe showed that multiple births are one of the determinants of infant mortality. According to the 2000 and 2005 health surveys in Ethiopia, multiple births are a serious public health problem [55]. It has been suggested that multiple births increase the economic burden of the family, and this affects the quality of nutrition and health care of the infant [39, 56].

Another finding from this study indicates that ANC service utilisation is significantly associated with infant mortality. As the number of ANC visits increased, the rate of infant mortality decreased, in keeping with past research [5759]. For example, a systematic review in Ethiopia indicated that the risk of early infant death was lower among women who had four or more ANC visits compared to those who had less than four visits [57].

The findings from this study showed that women (mothers) who had experienced a previous infant loss were twice as likely to experience a subsequent infant death compared to mothers who had no such previous loss. Studies conducted in different developing countries have indicated an effect of previous infant mortality on the survival of the next infant [60]; the death of the previous child may affect the survival of the next child, both biologically and environmentally [60]. The effect of the previous child’s death on the survival of the next child may be due to a shorter birth interval [61]. The biological impact of the death of the previous child on the short birth interval operates through an early cessation of breastfeeding and start of ovulation [61]. A shorter birth interval might have a negative impact on the survival status of next birth due to maternal depletion syndrome or the mother not fully recovering from the pregnancy before supporting the next birth [62]. Although the term “maternal depletion syndrome (MDS)” is used to describe the poor health status of mothers, however whether such a syndrome remains unclear [63]. The syndrome was commonly assigned to the nutritional stress induced by successive pregnancies, and pregnancies that were close together [63]. The odds of infant mortality were higher in pastoralist areas (Somali and Afar regions) than in the agrarian areas (Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, SNNPR and Harari regions). The difference in mortality among the regions may be due to variations in service accessibility and coverage. For example, the national Universal Health Coverage (UHC) service capacity and access coverage was 41.1%, 22.0%, 9.5%, 10.6% and 11.7% in Harari, Tigray, Amhara, Oromia and SNNPR, respectively. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) was lowest in Somali and Afar regions which at 3.7% and 4.1%, respectively [64]. In 2015, the universal health service coverage for Ethiopia was 34.3%, which is substantially behind the SDG target of 80% by the year 2030 but also much higher compared with other African countries [65]. According to a 2015 report, the family planning coverage in the regions of Somali and Tigray was 1.4% and 35.2%, respectively [64]. The immunisation coverage in the regions of Tigray and Afar were also 81.4% and 20.1%, respectively; access to a hospital was 26.1% and 2.3% in the regions of Tigray and Somali, respectively. This huge difference in UHC might lead to variation in population health indicators like infant mortality [64].

The infant health outcomes might not only be due to the differences in family characteristics, but might also be due to differences in the socio-economic characteristics of the community in which the infant lives [24, 25]. People in a community share similar resources due to most public services being spatially organised into clusters; this determines the health of individuals who live in that community [17]. Evidence suggests that living in an economically and socially deprived community is associated with increased risk of infant mortality. For instance, children born and raised in a community that lacks electricity, improved drinking water and poor access to health facilities are likely to suffer from the same deprivation, which can directly or indirectly influence their health outcomes [1416]. In a nationally representative study among 5391 live births in Nepal, researchers showed that community factors were associated with infant mortality: infants from the mountain region had a higher rate of mortality compared to those from the lowland region [66]. A possible reason may be people living in mountain areas are particularly vulnerable to food insecurity. Slopes with steep and differing elevations often make the soil shallow, poor in micronutrients, limited, difficult to cultivate and unsuitable for mass agricultural production [67]. In addition, living in mountain areas makes access to health services difficult. For example, a study conducted in rural areas of Ethiopia found that people living in remote areas are at high risk of child mortality [68]. Children who lived 1.5 hours or more hours from a health facility were at a two-fold higher risk of death compared to those who lived within 1.5 hours from a facility [68]. The reason may be that people living in mountainous and remote areas may spend many hours traveling by foot to access maternal and infant health services. In a multicounty study from 28 health surveys, it was shown that being a member of certain families and communities determined child mortality in SSA countries. In the study, household-level characteristics had also a significant effects on infant mortality [17, 18]. In a national study in Malawi, it was found that there was a variation in child mortality at the community level; researchers reported that around 18% of the variation in infant mortality was explained by community-level characteristics [19].

In many areas in Ethiopia, families cannot easily access routine health services. Access to routine health services, and subsequent health outcomes, depends on community-based services and norms. Therefore, intervention at an individual level is insufficient for tackling the problem of infant mortality, because the social and environmental contexts in which an infant lives affects their chances of survival, and people living in the same area share some of the major determinants of infant mortality such as access to water, sanitation and health care. Policymakers could consider community-level interventions, such as improving the community’s prevailing norms and attitudes about health behaviours, which can influence the healthcare decisions made by individuals. To minimise infant mortality as a public health problem, the Federal Ministry of Health in Ethiopia should focus on community-based interventions by giving more attention to socially and economically disadvantaged regions.

Strengths and limitations

While the EDHS is a large-scale, nationally representative dataset, there may be several limitations to this analysis. First, recall bias may be possible, as participants were asked to recall events in the 5 years prior the survey, and they may have forgotten some details. A second limitation of the data is the cross-sectional nature of the survey, which makes it difficult to identify causal relationships between outcome and exposure variables. Third, this study relies on self-reported information from life histories available from a nationally representative survey, which is subject to several sources of error: estimates for specific countries may be affected by these limitations across time, and these need to be taken with caution. Fourth, because of the nature of the survey data, we were unable to make a detailed assessment of the underlying causes of reductions in infant mortality.

While acknowledging these limitations, the EDHS is nationally representative dataset and has been rigorously designed and deployed by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention using a global framework, and the findings can therefore easily be generalised throughout the country. International comparisons of the findings will also be possible because DHSs adopt similar instruments across countries. We anticipate the findings of this study will have strong policy implications for Ethiopia at the national level, as this is a study that has identified community-level determinants of infant mortality in the country.

Conclusion

This study showed the importance of individual, household and community determinants in explaining variations in rates of infant mortality in Ethiopia. The results of this study indicate that there may be need to look beyond the influence of individual-level determinants in addressing infant mortality in the country. To ensure a substantial reduction in child mortality during infancy, attention may need to be given to a comprehensive approach comprising community-based interventions aimed at improving child survival in Ethiopia’s socially and economically disadvantaged regions. Previous research conducted at the institutional level and at smaller scales limits their applicability to whole nations. The findings from this study may give nationwide insight into the determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia. Finally, we recommended to policy makers and governments to focus on community level factors in addition to the individual and household level factors to achieve the SDG goals and targets by the end of 2030.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank for all women who participated in the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey and we would like to thank the DHS Program for allowing us to use the EDHS data for this study.

References

  1. 1. Reidpath D.D. and Allotey P., Infant mortality rate as an indicator of population health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2003. 57(5): p. 344–346. pmid:12700217
  2. 2. Brown B.V., Indicators of children’s well-being: A review of current indicators based on data from the federal statistical system. Indicators of Children’s Well-Being (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 1997.
  3. 3. Gonzalez R.M. and Gilleskie D., Infant mortality rate as a measure of a country’s health: a robust method to improve reliability and comparability. Demography, 2017. 54(2): p. 701–720. pmid:28233234
  4. 4. Schell C.O., et al., Socioeconomic determinants of infant mortality: a worldwide study of 152 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Scandinavian journal of public health, 2007. 35(3): p. 288–297. pmid:17530551
  5. 5. Zakir M. and Wunnava P.V., Factors affecting infant mortality rates: evidence from cross–sectional data. Applied Economics Letters, 1999. 6(5): p. 271–273.
  6. 6. CSA I., Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International, 2017. 551.
  7. 7. Hug L., Sharrow D., and You D., Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2017. Estimates developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2017.
  8. 8. Dube L., Taha M., and Asefa H., Determinants of infant mortality in community of Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center, Southwest Ethiopia: a matched case control study. BMC public health, 2013. 13(1): p. 401. pmid:23621915
  9. 9. Mengesha H.G., et al., Survival of neonates and predictors of their mortality in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia: prospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. 16(1): p. 202. pmid:27485138
  10. 10. Muluye S. and Wencheko E., Determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia: A study based on the 2005 EDHS data. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 2012. 26(2): p. 72–77.
  11. 11. Abate M.G., Angaw D.A., and Shaweno T., Proximate determinants of infant mortality in Ethiopia, 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health surveys: results from a survival analysis. Archives of Public Health, 2020. 78(1): p. 1–10.
  12. 12. Frankenberg E., The effects of access to health care on infant mortality in Indonesia. Health transition review, 1995: p. 143–163. pmid:10159677
  13. 13. Mosley W.H. and Chen L.C., An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Population and development review, 1984. 10(0): p. 25–45.
  14. 14. Robert S.A., Socioeconomic position and health: the independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annual review of sociology, 1999. 25(1): p. 489–516.
  15. 15. Ellen I.G., Mijanovich T., and Dillman K.-N., Neighborhood effects on health: exploring the links and assessing the evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2001. 23(3–4): p. 391–408.
  16. 16. Entwisle B., et al., Networks and contexts: Variation in the structure of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 2007. 112(5): p. 1495–1533.
  17. 17. Boco A.G., Individual and community level effects on child mortality: an analysis of 28 Demographic and Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2010.
  18. 18. MANDA S.O.M., Unobserved family and community effects on infant mortality in Malawi. Genus, 1998: p. 143–164. pmid:12321976
  19. 19. Bolstad W.M. and Manda S.O., Investigating child mortality in Malawi using family and community random effects: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2001. 96(453): p. 12–19.
  20. 20. Adedini S.A., et al., Regional variations in infant and child mortality in Nigeria: a multilevel analysis. Journal of biosocial science, 2015. 47(2): p. 165–187. pmid:24411023
  21. 21. Asefa M., Drewett R., and Tessema F., A birth cohort study in South-West Ethiopia to identify factors associated with infant mortality that are amenable for intervention. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 2000. 14(2): p. 161–168.
  22. 22. Dube L., Taha M., and Asefa H., Determinants of infant mortality in community of Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center, Southwest Ethiopia: a matched case control study. BMC Public Health, 2013. 13: p. 401. pmid:23621915
  23. 23. Kumar P.P. and File G., Infant and child mortality in Ethiopia: a statistical analysis approach. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 2010. 5(2).
  24. 24. Fotso J.-C., et al., Progress towards the child mortality millennium development goal in urban sub-Saharan Africa: the dynamics of population growth, immunization, and access to clean water. BMC Public Health, 2007. 7(1): p. 218.
  25. 25. Kravdal Ø., Child mortality in India: the community-level effect of education. Population studies, 2004. 58(2): p. 177–192. pmid:15204252
  26. 26. Holian J., Community-level determinants of infant mortality in Mexico. Journal of biosocial science, 1988. 20(1): p. 67–77. pmid:3339034
  27. 27. Organization, W.H., The World health report: 2005: make every mother and child count. 2005: World Health Organization.
  28. 28. CSA I., Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. 2017: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International. p. 24.
  29. 29. MEASURE D., ICF International. Standard recode manual for DHS 6 (version 1.0); description of the Demographic and Health Surveys individual recode data file. Measure DHS, Calverton, Maryland. Calverton, Maryland: MEASURE DHS/ICF International; 2013.
  30. 30. Team, S.M.M., The DHS Program User Forum.
  31. 31. Schoenborn C.A., Marital status and health, United States 1999–2002. 2004: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and ….
  32. 32. Demographic, E., Health Survey Central Statistical Agency and ICF International. Addis Ababa, Calverton, 2016.
  33. 33. Organization, W.H., Progress on sanitation and drinking water–2015 update and MDG assessment. 2015.
  34. 34. Alkire S., Kanagaratnam U., and Suppa N., The global multidimensional poverty index (MPI): 2018 revision. OPHI MPI methodological notes, 2018. 46.
  35. 35. Merlo J., Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology: measures of health variation compared with traditional measures of association. 2003, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
  36. 36. Merlo J., et al., A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2005. 59(6): p. 443–449. pmid:15911637
  37. 37. Pongou R., Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography, 2013. 50(2): p. 421–444. pmid:23151996
  38. 38. Waldron I., Recent trends in sex mortality ratios for adults in developed countries. Social science & medicine, 1993. 36(4): p. 451–462. pmid:8434270
  39. 39. Mekonnen D., Infant and Child Mortality in Ethiopia: The role of Socioeconomic, Demographic and Biological factors in the previous five years period of 2000 and 2005. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, 2011.
  40. 40. Mekonnen Y. and Mekonnen A., Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. Journal of health, population and nutrition, 2003: p. 374–382. pmid:15038593
  41. 41. JIRU E., Infant Mortality in Ethiopia. Black Lives Matter: Lifespan Perspectives, 2017: p. 67. pmid:29135348
  42. 42. Alkema L., et al., National, regional, and global sex ratios of infant, child, and under-5 mortality and identification of countries with outlying ratios: a systematic assessment. The Lancet Global Health, 2014. 2(9): p. e521–e530. pmid:25304419
  43. 43. Zhao D., et al., Gender differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity in mixed-gender twins. Scientific reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 1–6. pmid:28127051
  44. 44. Organization W.H., Health risks of female genital mutilation (FGM). Accessed on, 2016. 20(8): p. 16.
  45. 45. Mohamud O.A., Female circumcision and child mortality in urban Somalia. Genus, 1991: p. 203–223. pmid:12285503
  46. 46. Das Gupta M., et al., Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 2003. 40(2): p. 153–187.
  47. 47. Hesketh T. and Xing Z.W., Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006. 103(36): p. 13271–13275. pmid:16938885
  48. 48. Barcellos S.H., Carvalho L.S., and Lleras-Muney A., Child gender and parental investments in India: Are boys and girls treated differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2014. 6(1): p. 157–89. pmid:24575163
  49. 49. Kifetew K., Gender and cross cultural dynamics in Ethiopia. Agenda, 2006. 20(68): p. 122–127.
  50. 50. Ananth C.V., et al., Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2005. 193(3): p. 1076. e1–1076. e9. pmid:16157115
  51. 51. Joseph K., et al., Preterm birth, stillbirth and infant mortality among triplet births in Canada, 1985–96. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2002. 16(2): p. 141–148. pmid:12064268
  52. 52. Zein A., The frequency of multiple births in Gondar Hospital northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian medical journal, 1989. 27(1): p. 21–26. pmid:2920708
  53. 53. Temesgen T., Fitsum A., and Gurmesa T., Incidence and risk factors of twin pregnancy at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Epidemiology: Open Access, 2015. 5(2).
  54. 54. Korsak V., Incidence and some perinatal problems of multiple pregnancies in a central referral hospital, Addis Ababa. Ethiopian medical journal, 1989. 27(4): p. 217–221. pmid:2598909
  55. 55. Mekonnen D., Infant and Child Mortality in Ethiopia: The role of Socioeconomic, Demographic and Biological factors in the previous five years period of 2000 and 2005. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, 2011. 68.
  56. 56. Kembo J. and Van Ginneken J.K., Determinants of infant and child mortality in Zimbabwe: Results of multivariate hazard analysis. Demographic Research, 2009. 21: p. 367–384.
  57. 57. Wondemagegn A.T., et al., The effect of antenatal care follow-up on neonatal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public health reviews, 2018. 39(1): p. 33. pmid:30574407
  58. 58. Tekelab T., et al., The impact of antenatal care on neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 2019. 14(9): p. e0222566. pmid:31518365
  59. 59. Kuhnt J. and Vollmer S., Antenatal care services and its implications for vital and health outcomes of children: evidence from 193 surveys in 69 low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ open, 2017. 7(11): p. e017122. pmid:29146636
  60. 60. DaVanzo J., Butz W.P., and Habicht J.-P., How biological and behavioural influences on mortality in Malaysia vary during the first year of life. Population studies, 1983. 37(3): p. 381–402.
  61. 61. Knodel J., Infant mortality and fertility in three Bavarian villages: An analysis of family histories from the 19th century. Population Studies, 1968. 22(3): p. 297–318. pmid:22091649
  62. 62. Saha U.R. and van Soest A., Contraceptive use, birth spacing, and child survival in Matlab, Bangladesh. Studies in family planning, 2013. 44(1): p. 45–66. pmid:23512873
  63. 63. Winikoff B. and Castle M.A., The maternal depletion syndrome: clinical diagnosis of eco-demographic condition? The maternal depletion syndrome: clinical diagnosis of eco-demographic condition?, 1987.
  64. 64. Eregata G.T., et al., Measuring progress towards universal health coverage: national and subnational analysis in Ethiopia. BMJ Global Health, 2019. 4(6). pmid:31798996
  65. 65. Raszkowski A. and Bartniczak B., On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Poland. Sustainability, 2019. 11(2): p. 366.
  66. 66. Khadka K.B., et al., The socio-economic determinants of infant mortality in Nepal: analysis of Nepal Demographic Health Survey, 2011. BMC pediatrics, 2015. 15(1): p. 152. pmid:26459356
  67. 67. Romeo R., et al., Mapping the vulnerability of mountain peoples to food insecurity. Rome: FAO, 2015.
  68. 68. Okwaraji Y.B., et al., Effect of geographical access to health facilities on child mortality in rural Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study. Plos one, 2012. 7(3): p. e33564. pmid:22428070