https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7316-1882
Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major increasing public health problem worldwide, with clinical and epidemiological differences between men and women. However, contemporary population-level data on incidence and survival are scarce.
Aim
To evaluate sex-specific contemporary trends in the incidence, prevalence, and long-term survival of non-valvular AF in a real-world setting
Methods
AF patients diagnosed between 2007–2015, insured by a large, state-mandated health organization in Israel (Maccabi Healthcare Services) were included. AF was diagnosed based on registered diagnoses. Patients with valvular disease, active malignancy, cardiac surgery ≤ 6 months, or recent pregnancy, were excluded. Annual incidence rate, period prevalence, and 5-year survival for each calendar year during the study period, were calculated.
Results
A total of 15,409 eligible patients (8,288 males, 7,121 females) were identified. Males were more likely to be younger, have higher rates of underlying diseases (ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), but with lower rates of hypertension and chronic kidney diseases as compared to female patients. During the study period, age-adjusted incidence decreased both in men: (-0.020/1,000-person year, p-for trend = 0.033) and, women (-0.025/1,000 person-year p = 0.009). The five-year survival rate was significantly higher among men vs. women (77.1% vs. 71.5%, respectively, p<0.001). Age-adjusted prevalence increased significantly among men (+0.102 per year, p-for trend<0.001) yet decreased among women (-0.082 per year, p-for trend = 0.005). A significant trend toward improved long-term survival was observed in women and not in men.
Citation: Shiyovich A, Chodick G, Azani L, Tirosh M, Shuvy M, Pereg D, et al. (2021) Sex-specific contemporary trends in incidence, prevalence and survival of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A long-term real-world data analysis. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0247097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247097
Editor: Antonio Cannatà, King’s College London, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: October 6, 2020; Accepted: January 29, 2021; Published: February 18, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Shiyovich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The study data included individual-level sensitive information. According to the regulation of the Israeli Ministry of Health (01/18) and MHS's data privacy policy, patient-level data (including de-identified information) cannot be transferred outside MHS's premise. Queries regarding the data can be addressed to (study reference number 0046-16): Maccabi Institute for Health Services Research. 4 Kaufmann St. Sharbat house, 8th floor, Tel Aviv, Israel Email: contact@maccabitech.com.
Funding: The study was sponsored by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Israel ltd. grant number B0661099 Conflict of interest statement: A. Shiyovich received a honorarium from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Israel ltd. M. Tirosh is an employee of Pfizer Israel. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder approved the study protocol and approved the publication of the study and the manuscript.
Competing interests: A. Shiyovich received an honorarium (consultation fees) from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Israel ltd. M. Tirosh is an employee of Pfizer Israel. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia of clinical significance, with significantly greater prevalence in older persons and those with cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities [1, 2]. AF is considered a major public health problem associated with increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke [1, 3, 4], chronic kidney disease, dementia, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and mortality [5–9]. It has been estimated that AF accounts for an annual expenditure of $6–26 billion in the United States [10]. The most significant predictors of AF are age and sex; the prevalence of AF doubles with every decade and is 1-2-fold greater in men compared with women [11–13]. Recent reports from different countries demonstrated a trend of increase in the incidence and prevalence of AF over time while mortality seems to be decreasing [5, 7, 14–19]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that these temporal changes are disproportionate between the sexes and different age groups [5, 19, 20]. However, these reports are based mostly on registries and cohort studies and thus might be biased while data from unselected populations are sparse.
The aim of this study was to evaluate sex-specific contemporary trends in the incidence, prevalence and long-term survival of AF patients in a real-world setting.
Methods
Study design and population
The current study included patients insured by Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), one of the largest healthcare providers in Israel, covering over 2 million members, diagnosed with AF between 2007 and 2015, and aged 21 years or older at the time of diagnosis. The date of AF diagnosis was defined as the index date.
A subject was considered to have AF if they had a registered diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) 427.3x –atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter, which will be referred henceforth as AF) documented in one of the following: a hospital discharge letter, cardiologist visit, primary care physician visit (recorded on two separate visits or more), or single documentation by any physician combined with the prescription of oral anticoagulants (OACs). Exclusion criteria were—1. valvular AF—history of heart valve replacement (ICD 9 codes: V42.2, V43.3, 35.2x) and rheumatic mitral stenosis (394.0, 394.1); (hence AF in this manuscript refers to non-valvular AF); 2. active malignancy; 3. cardiac surgery or acute pulmonary heart disease (415.x) in the 6 months before diagnosis; 4. pregnancy within 16 months before AF diagnosis.
The study protocol was approved by the Maccabi Healthcare Services Institutional Review board (0046-16-BBL) and conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration. Patient consent was waived by the review board.
Data collection and definitions
Demographic and clinical data were collected from MHS and Israel’s ministry of health databases. Baseline comorbidities and risk score calculations were obtained from MHS patient registries, described previously [21, 22] and included: age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), ischemic heart disease (IHD) with or without a history of myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated for all patients by assigning 2 points for age≥75 years (A2) and history of stroke, TIA, or thromboembolism (S2) and 1 point for each of the following criteria: CHF (C), hypertension (H), diabetes mellitus (D), age 65 to 75 years (A), vascular disease (VA) (defined as previous myocardial infarction, complex aortic plaque, carotid stenosis, and peripheral artery disease) and female sex category (Sc). Data regarding medical therapy (at least 2 dispensed packs during 120 days before index date) were obtained and classified according to the following therapeutic agents: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), alpha-blockers, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, diuretics, heparins, nitrates, antiplatelets, and vasodilators.
Dates of death or leaving the health maintenance organization (HMO) are reported to MHS daily from the Israel National Insurance Institute. Residential area SES level was based on a commercial index (developed by Points Location Intelligence) ranging from 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest). Scoring is conducted according to various socioeconomic indices (e.g. credit card use information, housing prices, education level, etc.) and was previously shown to highly correlate with the SES index provided by Israel’s National Bureau of Statistics [23].
Statistical analysis
Parametric and non-parametric variables are summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median [interquartile range (IQR)], respectively. For categorical values, counts (%) were calculated. Comparisons between sexes were conducted using the Mann-Whitney test or Chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Prevalent AF cases were defined as MHS members alive at the beginning of an index year and before or throughout that year. Incident cases were defined as MHS members diagnosed with AF during an index year. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to study the differences in all-cause mortality survival from the index date. We employed a log-linear regression model to estimate annual percentage change, in which age and calendar year included as independent variables. Survival analysis was performed with the use of Cox’s regression models. For the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Two-tailed significance was defined as p<0.05. For survival analysis, patients were classified into 3 groups according to the diagnosis period; 2007–2009, 2010–2012, and 2013–2015. Statistical Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS for windows version 25.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. and R3.5.1.
Results
AF incidence
Throughout the follow-up period, a total of 15,409 subjects (8,288 males, 7,121 females) were diagnosed with AF. S1 Table presents the number of incident AF cases by year and sex.
Table 1 displays the baseline characteristics of the incident cases stratified by sex. Male patients (53.8% of all patients) were significantly younger and from higher SES. Furthermore, male patients had increased rates of most cardiovascular risk factors and lower CHA2DS2-VASC score (2.4±1.9 vs. 3.8±1.7, p<0.001, respectively). The prevalence of chronic medical therapy with antiplatelet medications was significantly higher among males; however; treatment with angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, and calcium channel blockers was statistically significantly less common compared with females.
The incidence of AF increased with age. Moreover, the incidence seemed to be higher in males compared with females across all age groups (Fig 1, S2 Table). Furthermore, the crude incidence increased over time from 1.35/1,000 person-years (PY) to 1.55/1,000 PY (males 1.53/1000 PY to 1.78/1000 PY, females 1.18/1000 PY to 1.35/1000 PY). The age-adjusted temporal trends in incidence are presented in Fig 2. A statistically significant decrease in the age-adjusted incidence was observed over time (-0.025/ 1000 PY, p = 0.009), both among males (-0.020/1000 PY, p-for trend = 0.033) and females (-0.025/1000 PY, p = 0.009).
*age-adjusted incidence evaluates the incidence that would have existed if the particular group under study had the same age distribution as the reference group. Thus, this measure adjusts for differences in incidence stemming for differences in age distributions.
AF prevalence
The total number of subjects diagnosed with AF increased from 14,527 (7,914 males, 6,613 females) in 2007 to 22,373 in 2015 (12,652 males, 9,721 females). This increase represents a total increment of 54%, with a greater increase in males (60%) than in females (47%). Fig 3 and S3 and S4 Tables present the number of subjects with AF stratified by sex and follow-up year and the prevalence of AF by age and sex, respectively. The prevalence of AF increased from 13.3/1,000 PY to 16.9/1,000 PY between 2007–2015. The prevalence of AF increased with age and seemed to be higher in males compared with females and higher in 2015 vs. 2007 for every age sub-group. A greater increase in the prevalence of AF was observed among males (15.3 to 20.1/1,000 PY) than among females (11.4 to 13.9/1,000 PY) over time. The age-adjusted temporal trends in AF prevalence presented in Fig 4 show no statistically significant difference over time (+0.010/1000 PY p = 0.554). However, a separate analysis of trends stratified by sex showed an increase in prevalence among males (+0.102/1000 PY, p-for trend<0.001) and a decrease among females (-0.082/1000 PY, p-for trend = 0.005).
* Every curve comprise a sample color halo represents 95% confidence interval.
All-cause mortality in AF patients
Long term survival curves following AF diagnosis by sex are presented in S1 Fig. The five-year survival rate with AF was significantly higher among males compared to females (77.1% vs. 71.5%, respectively, p<0.001). Fig 5 presents sex-specific long-term survival curves, stratified by the period of diagnosis. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, male sex was statistically significantly (p = 0.002) associated with a HR of 0.89 (95%CI: 0.82–0.96) after adjusting for age, calendar year at index date, IHD, MI, stroke, HF, DM, CKD, hypertension, and osteoporosis.
* Every curve comprises a sample color halo which represents 95% confidence interval.
As displayed in Fig 5, a statistically significant trend of improvement in survival was found among females but not males, throughout the study period.
Discussion
The present study evaluated temporal trends in the incidence and prevalence of AF by age and sex in contemporary real-world population data obtained from a large healthcare provider in Israel. The main findings include the following: 1) the incidence of AF is higher in men versus women and increased over time in both sexes; however, the age-adjusted incidence decreased in both sexes. 2) Significant differences in the characteristics of the incident cases between sexes. Male patients were younger, had higher SES, higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, yet lower CHA2DS2-VASC scores. This could be attributed to the higher scoring of female sex and older age among females rather than other comorbidities and risk factors in women. 3) The prevalence of AF increased with age, was higher in males compared with females, and seems to have increased in every age sub-group between 2007–2015. The latter increase was more pronounced among males compared with females. However, the age-adjusted analysis showed an increase in prevalence among males and a decrease among females over time. 4) Although overall long-term survival following AF diagnosis was better among men compared with women, a statistically significant trend for improved survival over time was found only in women.
Incidence
Our findings are consistent with most other reports demonstrating a higher incidence of AF (up to 2-fold) among men compared with women and a disproportionate increase in incidence with increasing age among both sexes [12, 13, 17, 24, 25]. The incidence rates and the observed sex-related disparities in the characteristics of incident AF patients, particularly the older age, greater prevalence of hypertension, and the lower prevalence of IHD among females, are overall consistent with rates reported from other developed countries [17, 26–28].
Several previous studies have evaluated temporal trends in the sex-specific incidence and AF, most showing findings consistent with ours [12, 13, 18, 29]. The Framingham Heart Study and a global systematic review reported an increase in the incidence of AF in both sexes between 1958–2007 and 1990–2010, respectively. [13, 17]. However, recent studies have suggested plateauing and flattening of the trend of an increase in the incidence of AF [29–32], which are in partial agreement and possibly precede our findings of the age-adjusted decrease in the incidence of AF. Our observation is novel and significant, for which a clear explanation is unknown. Possible explanations could be related to “technical issues” such as the contemporary period of our study (advanced diagnostic methods available throughout the entire period), the age-selective intensity of diagnostic evaluation and documentation (greater in older people), reduced detection and recording of more sporadic forms of AF and methodological variations between studies. Alternatively, the age-adjusted decrease could potentially stem from an actual improvement in the “general health” of the population with better control of risk factors and AF shifting towards older age [33]. Moreover, it has been previously reported that the population attributable risk for AF of coronary disease is higher in men, whereas the population attributable risks of elevated systolic blood pressure and valvular disease are higher in women [19, 34]. Hence, different trends in the incidence and management of such risk factors could result in sex-related disparities in the incidence of AF.
Prevalence
Similar to incidence, the prevalence of AF was significantly greater in men compared with women. This finding is consistent with previous reports from other countries, although AF prevalence has been shown to differ significantly according to ancestry [17, 18]. Contemporary studies evaluating sex-specific temporal trends in AF prevalence are relatively scarce. Two studies from the UK, based on primary care settings, showed an increase in AF prevalence in both sexes across all ages. [35, 36]. Similar findings also reported in a 50-year follow-up from the Framingham cohort and a community-based study from Iceland [13, 18]. Our age-adjusted prevalence trends showed an increase among men and a decline in women. Such sex-related disparities are in agreement with previous findings from the Copenhagen City Heart Study [37]. Hence, our results, which are based on a relatively contemporary cohort, could be one of the first indications supporting the notion that prevalence is indeed leveling off. Two main determinants of AF prevalence, which can explain the observed trends, are the incidence of AF and improved survival. With the incidence plateauing, the increased survival and aging of the patients could be more prominent explanations for the elevated unadjusted prevalence. Moreover, earlier diagnosis (i.e., lead-time bias) resulting from increased awareness and more intensive and efficient monitoring could also explain, in part, increasing prevalence.
Numerous sex-specific factors could account for the differences in the incidence, prevalence, and temporal trends of AF between men and women. First, sex differences in risk factors, comorbidities, higher frequency of atypical presentation, and deferred diagnosis among women versus men [13, 26, 38]. Second, hormonal (increased estrogen, cyclical progesterone, and increased prevalence of thyroid abnormalities in women) and differences in cardiac electrophysiological parameters (e.g. shorter atrial myocyte action potential duration, higher negative resting membrane potential, differences in K+ and Ca2+ currents among females) may all impact the risk for AF and sex-related differences [26, 39–41]. Third, structural differences between men and women. For example, smaller left atria and ventricles, lower left ventricular wall thickness, and a higher degree of atrial fibrosis in women vs. men [42–44]. Fourth, metabolic differences could also play a role, with women reported having higher serum values of FGF-23 and inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein level [26, 43, 45]. Fifth, sex-related differences in AF management, with a lower rate of pharmacological (antiarrhythmic and anticoagulants medications) or interventional rhythm control (electric cardioversion, or catheter ablation) among women compared with men [26, 28, 46]. Lastly, increased rate of complications such as stroke and thromboembolism and mortality among women [26, 46].
The explanations for the differences in temporal trends are not completely clear and are probably multifactorial, relating to differences in survival, risk factors, management, and diagnosis.
Mortality
We found higher mortality rates among women compared with men; however, survival improved significantly only among women throughout the study period. The finding of higher mortality rates among women is consistent with a previous report from the Framingham Heart Study [47] and a large meta-analysis that included over 4 million patients [48]. Possible explanations of this finding include increased comorbidity, delayed AF diagnosis with a longer AF history, and a higher AF burden among women. Another plausible explanation is undertreatment, with multiple reports indicating a reduced rate of oral anticoagulants prescription, increased utilization of rate control over rhythm control strategy, and lower referral to invasive strategies (e.g., catheter ablation) alongside with increased rate of complications in these procedures [28, 49, 50].
Previous studies have demonstrated a trend for improved survival in AF over time, as shown in our investigation among females [13, 25, 29]. The upward trend in survival can be due to advances in medical and interventional management, particularly, the increasing use of safer and more effective oral anticoagulation (associated with reduction in the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism) [13, 32], earlier detection [32], and a particular focus on the management monitoring of women following the growing knowledge of their worse outcomes. Nevertheless, since women presenting with AF significantly differ from men, being older, with a higher prevalence of hypertension, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, AF-related symptoms, and lower prevalence of CAD. It is possible, therefore, that growing emphasis on better guideline-directed management of cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension in particular, and not necessarily the AF-specific management, resulted in improved survival in women only [33, 51].
Several limitations should be acknowledged when interpreting our results. The present study is retrospective and observational and is subject to limitations inherent in such a design. Patient data were derived from one HMO in Israel, and although it is the second-largest HMO, selection bias is a likelihood, limiting thereby generalizability of findings. Since the diagnoses were primarily abstracted from administrative databases (based on ICD-9), inaccuracies from coding errors could potentially bias the results. Although the current study did not include adjudication and overruling of the diagnoses, such quality assurance measures are continuously utilized by MHS. Finally, asymptomatic AF or AF in patients who did not seek medical care was not recorded and accounted for, potentially underestimating AF incidence and prevalence. However, this drawback is common in most large-scale registries evaluating temporal trends in AF epidemiology.
Conclusions
The incidence and prevalence of AF in Israel increased with age and were higher in men compared with women. Between 2007 and 2015, an increase in AF incidence and prevalence was observed in both but was more pronounced among men. However, after age-adjustment, the incidence of AF decreased in both sexes, while AF prevalence increased among males and decreased among females over time. Mortality rates were higher among women compared with men; however, survival improved significantly only among women throughout the study period. Further investigation of the observed trends and their causes as well as age and sex-sensitive programs targeted at optimizing evaluation and management of AF to reduce its burden and dire outcomes is warranted.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Survival curves of patients diagnosed with AF by sex.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247097.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Number of incident AF cases by year.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247097.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Table. AF incidence by age and sex in 2007 and 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247097.s003
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Number of prevalent cases of AF by year.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247097.s004
(DOCX)
S4 Table. AF prevalence by age and sex in 2007 and 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247097.s005
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Dr. Rola Hamood for her editorial assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.
References
- 1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2016;18(11):1609–78. Epub 2016/11/04.
- 2. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006;114(7):e257–354. Epub 2006/08/16. pmid:16908781
- 3. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. Jama. 2001;285(18):2370–5. Epub 2001/05/10. pmid:11343485
- 4. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–8. Epub 1991/08/01. pmid:1866765
- 5. Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2014;11(11):639–54. Epub 2014/08/13. pmid:25113750
- 6. Soliman EZ, Safford MM, Muntner P, Khodneva Y, Dawood FZ, Zakai NA, et al. Atrial fibrillation and the risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA internal medicine. 2014;174(1):107–14. Epub 2013/11/06. pmid:24190540
- 7. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna W, et al. Incidence and mortality risk of congestive heart failure in atrial fibrillation patients: a community-based study over two decades. European heart journal. 2006;27(8):936–41. Epub 2006/01/10. pmid:16399778
- 8. Kwok CS, Loke YK, Hale R, Potter JF, Myint PK. Atrial fibrillation and incidence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2011;76(10):914–22. Epub 2011/03/09. pmid:21383328
- 9. Bansal N, Xie D, Tao K, Chen J, Deo R, Horwitz E, et al. Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of ESRD in Adults with CKD. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN. 2016;11(7):1189–96. Epub 2016/04/14. pmid:27073197
- 10. Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu BC, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2011;4(3):313–20. Epub 2011/05/05. pmid:21540439
- 11. Andrade JG, Deyell MW, Lee AYK, Macle L. Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2018;34(4):429–36. Epub 2018/02/20. pmid:29455950
- 12. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114(2):119–25. Epub 2006/07/05. pmid:16818816
- 13. Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, Larson MG, Beiser AS, McManus DD, et al. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2015;386(9989):154–62. Epub 2015/05/12. pmid:25960110
- 14. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Stricker BH, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. European heart journal. 2006;27(8):949–53. Epub 2006/03/11. pmid:16527828
- 15. Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1042–6. Epub 2004/08/18. pmid:15313941
- 16. Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, Lip GY, Franco OH, Hofman A, et al. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. European heart journal. 2013;34(35):2746–51. Epub 2013/08/01. pmid:23900699
- 17. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129(8):837–47. Epub 2013/12/19. pmid:24345399
- 18. Stefansdottir H, Aspelund T, Gudnason V, Arnar DO. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in Iceland and future projections. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2011;13(8):1110–7. Epub 2011/05/10. pmid:21551478
- 19. Ko D, Rahman F, Schnabel RB, Yin X, Benjamin EJ, Christophersen IE. Atrial fibrillation in women: epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2016;13(6):321–32. Epub 2016/04/08. pmid:27053455
- 20. Wilke T, Groth A, Mueller S, Pfannkuche M, Verheyen F, Linder R, et al. Incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation: an analysis based on 8.3 million patients. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013;15(4):486–93. Epub 2012/12/12. pmid:23220354
- 21. Chodick G, Heymann AD, Shalev V, Kookia E. The epidemiology of diabetes in a large Israeli HMO. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(12):1143–6. Epub 2004/02/05. pmid:14758871
- 22. Shalev V, Chodick G, Goren I, Silber H, Kokia E, Heymann AD. The use of an automated patient registry to manage and monitor cardiovascular conditions and related outcomes in a large health organization. Int J Cardiol. 2011;152(3):345–9. Epub 2010/09/10. pmid:20826019
- 23.
http://www.points.co.il.
- 24. Chien KL, Su TC, Hsu HC, Chang WT, Chen PC, Chen MF, et al. Atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence and risk of stroke and all-cause death among Chinese. International journal of cardiology. 2010;139(2):173–80. Epub 2008/12/03. pmid:19046608
- 25. Lane DA, Skjoth F, Lip GYH, Larsen TB, Kotecha D. Temporal Trends in Incidence, Prevalence, and Mortality of Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Care. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6(5). Epub 2017/04/30.
- 26. Ko D, Rahman F, Martins MA, Hylek EM, Ellinor PT, Schnabel RB, et al. Atrial fibrillation in women: treatment. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2017;14(2):113–24. Epub 2016/11/05. pmid:27786235
- 27. Zulkifly H, Lip GYH, Lane DA. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. International journal of clinical practice. 2018;72(3):e13070. Epub 2018/03/02. pmid:29493854
- 28. Anselmino M, Battaglia A, Gallo C, Gili S, Matta M, Castagno D, et al. Atrial fibrillation and female sex. Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md). 2015;16(12):795–801. Epub 2015/03/26. pmid:25806470
- 29. Piccini JP, Hammill BG, Sinner MF, Jensen PN, Hernandez AF, Heckbert SR, et al. Incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and associated mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1993–2007. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2012;5(1):85–93. Epub 2012/01/12. pmid:22235070
- 30. Williams BA, Honushefsky AM, Berger PB. Temporal Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation From 2004 to 2016. The American journal of cardiology. 2017;120(11):1961–5. Epub 2017/10/17. pmid:29033050
- 31. Chamberlain AM, Gersh BJ, Alonso A, Chen LY, Berardi C, Manemann SM, et al. Decade-long trends in atrial fibrillation incidence and survival: a community study. The American journal of medicine. 2015;128(3):260–7 e1. Epub 2014/12/03. pmid:25446299
- 32. Scowcroft AC, Cowie MR. Atrial fibrillation: improvement in identification and stroke preventive therapy—data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 2000–2012. International journal of cardiology. 2014;171(2):169–73. Epub 2014/01/07. pmid:24387894
- 33. Peters SAE, Muntner P, Woodward M. Sex Differences in the Prevalence of, and Trends in, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Treatment, and Control in the United States, 2001 to 2016. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1025–35. Epub 2019/02/20. pmid:30779652
- 34. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. Jama. 1994;271(11):840–4. Epub 1994/03/16. pmid:8114238
- 35. DeWilde S, Carey IM, Emmas C, Richards N, Cook DG. Trends in the prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation, its treatment with anticoagulation and predictors of such treatment in UK primary care. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2006;92(8):1064–70. Epub 2006/01/03. pmid:16387813
- 36. Majeed A, Moser K, Carroll K. Trends in the prevalence and management of atrial fibrillation in general practice in England and Wales, 1994–1998: analysis of data from the general practice research database. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2001;86(3):284–8. Epub 2001/08/22. pmid:11514479
- 37. Friberg J, Scharling H, Gadsboll N, Jensen GB. Sex-specific increase in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (The Copenhagen City Heart Study). The American journal of cardiology. 2003;92(12):1419–23. Epub 2003/12/17. pmid:14675577
- 38. Ball J, Carrington MJ, Wood KA, Stewart S. Women versus men with chronic atrial fibrillation: insights from the Standard versus Atrial Fibrillation spEcific managemenT studY (SAFETY). PloS one. 2013;8(5):e65795. Epub 2013/06/05. pmid:23734260
- 39. Kamalvand K, Tan K, Lloyd G, Gill J, Bucknall C, Sulke N. Alterations in atrial electrophysiology associated with chronic atrial fibrillation in man. European heart journal. 1999;20(12):888–95. Epub 1999/05/18. pmid:10329094
- 40. Drici MD, Burklow TR, Haridasse V, Glazer RI, Woosley RL. Sex hormones prolong the QT interval and downregulate potassium channel expression in the rabbit heart. Circulation. 1996;94(6):1471–4. Epub 1996/09/15. pmid:8823008
- 41. Buitrago C, Massheimer V, de Boland AR. Acute modulation of Ca2+ influx on rat heart by 17beta-estradiol. Cellular signalling. 2000;12(1):47–52. Epub 2000/02/17. pmid:10676847
- 42. Cochet H, Mouries A, Nivet H, Sacher F, Derval N, Denis A, et al. Age, atrial fibrillation, and structural heart disease are the main determinants of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a general cardiology population. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2015;26(5):484–92. Epub 2015/03/03. pmid:25727248
- 43. Khera A, McGuire DK, Murphy SA, Stanek HG, Das SR, Vongpatanasin W, et al. Race and gender differences in C-reactive protein levels. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005;46(3):464–9. Epub 2005/08/02. pmid:16053959
- 44. McManus DD, Xanthakis V, Sullivan LM, Zachariah J, Aragam J, Larson MG, et al. Longitudinal tracking of left atrial diameter over the adult life course: Clinical correlates in the community. Circulation. 2010;121(5):667–74. Epub 2010/01/27. pmid:20100973
- 45. Mathew JS, Sachs MC, Katz R, Patton KK, Heckbert SR, Hoofnagle AN, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 and incident atrial fibrillation: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). Circulation. 2014;130(4):298–307. Epub 2014/06/13. pmid:24920722
- 46. Hsu JC, Maddox TM, Kennedy K, Katz DF, Marzec LN, Lubitz SA, et al. Aspirin Instead of Oral Anticoagulant Prescription in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Risk for Stroke. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;67(25):2913–23. Epub 2016/06/25. pmid:27339487
- 47. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998;98(10):946–52. Epub 1998/09/16. pmid:9737513
- 48. Emdin CA, Odutayo A, Wong CX, Tran J, Hsiao AJ, Hunn BH. Meta-Analysis of Anxiety as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease. The American journal of cardiology. 2016;118(4):511–9. Epub 2016/06/22. pmid:27324160
- 49. Zylla MM, Brachmann J, Lewalter T, Hoffmann E, Kuck KH, Andresen D, et al. Sex-related outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: Insights from the German Ablation Registry. Heart rhythm. 2016;13(9):1837–44. Epub 2016/06/12. pmid:27289011
- 50. Potpara TS, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Sex-related differences in atrial fibrillation: can we discern true disparities from biases? Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2017;103(13):979–81. Epub 2017/05/01. pmid:28456754
- 51. Potpara TS, Marinkovic JM, Polovina MM, Stankovic GR, Seferovic PM, Ostojic MC, et al. Gender-related differences in presentation, treatment and long-term outcome in patients with first-diagnosed atrial fibrillation and structurally normal heart: the Belgrade atrial fibrillation study. International journal of cardiology. 2012;161(1):39–44. Epub 2011/05/17. pmid:21570138