Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

alms1 mutant zebrafish do not show hair cell phenotypes seen in other cilia mutants

Abstract

Multiple cilia-associated genes have been shown to affect hair cells in zebrafish (Danio rerio), including the human deafness gene dcdc2, the radial spoke gene rsph9, and multiple intraflagellar transport (IFT) and transition zone genes. Recently a zebrafish alms1 mutant was generated. The ALMS1 gene is the gene mutated in the ciliopathy Alström Syndrome a disease that causes hearing loss among other symptoms. The hearing loss seen in Alström Syndrome may be due in part to hair cell defects as Alms1 mutant mice show stereocilia polarity defects and a loss of hair cells. Hair cell loss is also seen in postmortem analysis of Alström patients. The zebrafish alms1 mutant has metabolic defects similar to those seen in Alström syndrome and Alms1 mutant mice. We wished to investigate if it also had hair cell defects. We, however, failed to find any hair cell related phenotypes in alms1 mutant zebrafish. They had normal lateral line hair cell numbers as both larvae and adults and normal kinocilia formation. They also showed grossly normal swimming behavior, response to vibrational stimuli, and FM1-43 loading. Mutants also showed a normal degree of sensitivity to both short-term neomycin and long-term gentamicin treatment. These results indicate that cilia-associated genes differentially affect different hair cell types.

Introduction

Hearing and balance disorders are common sensory disorders [1, 2]. There is a significant genetic component to these disorders, with over 50% of congenital hearing loss seen in newborns being hereditary [3]. To date, 121 nonsyndromic hearing loss genes have been identified in addition to many syndromic hearing loss genes [4]. While most of these genes are only implicated in hearing loss, mutations in a small subset also cause balance disorders [5, 6]. Genetic mutations causing hearing loss can affect various processes important for hearing. A number of these mutations specifically affect the development and function of the sensory hair cells responsible for hearing [3].

Zebrafish have evolved as a useful model to study the genetics of hair cell function. Zebrafish are powerful genetic models and have hair cells on the surface of their bodies as part of the lateral line system, which allows for the observation of hair cells in an intact in vivo model. Researchers have carried out large-scale genetic screens to identify zebrafish mutants with auditory or vestibular defects [79] as well as generated zebrafish models of known deafness genes [10, 11].

One class of genes that have been shown to influence hair cells in humans and zebrafish are cilia-associated genes. Multiple ciliopathies, genetic disorders with mutations in cilia-associated genes, have been associated with hearing loss, including Usher Syndrome, Alström Syndrome, and Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS) [1216]. A number of Usher Syndrome genes have also been shown to affect hair cell function in zebrafish [1722]. Other cilia genes associated with hearing loss in humans include DCDC2, CDC14A, CCDC114, and the basal body genes CEP78 and CEP250 [2328]. While some of these genes, such as dcdc2, are similarly necessary for hair cell function in zebrafish [26] others such as cdc14A do not cause zebrafish hair cell phenotypes when mutated [29]. There have also been a number of cilia-associated genes that have not been implicated in human deafness but have been shown to cause hair cell phenotypes when disrupted in zebrafish. Mutations in intraflagellar transport (IFT) genes, genes necessary for the transport of proteins along cilia, in zebrafish have been shown to decrease hair cell numbers, lead to resistance to aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death, and to cause defects in FM1-43 uptake and early reverse polarity hair cell mechanotransduction activity [3033]. Mutations in transition zone genes, genes that act as gatekeepers for proteins exiting and entering cilia, have also been shown to cause resistance to aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death but to have normal FM1-43 uptake and control hair cell numbers [32, 34], and a mutation in rsph9, a radial spoke gene in motile cilia, caused a reduced initiation of the startle response to acoustic stimuli in zebrafish suggesting a potential hair cell defect [35].

Recently a zebrafish alms1 mutant line was generated [36]. ALMS1 is the gene responsible for Alström Syndrome, a ciliopathy characterized by hearing and vision loss in addition to obesity and diabetes [13, 37, 38]. Dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertriglyceridemia, gastrointestinal disturbances, neurological symptoms, and liver and kidney dysfunction have also been observed in some patients [39]. ALMS1 localizes to the basal body at the base of cilia leading to the classification of Alström Syndrome as a ciliopathy [40]. Hearing loss in Alström Syndrome patients usually begins in childhood and is progressive [39, 41, 42] with patients also showing abnormal distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) [42, 43] Vestibular defects have not been observed. Postmortem analysis of patient auditory tissue shows degeneration of the organ of Corti, including a loss of hair cells. Additionally, there is atrophy of the stria vascularis and spiral ligament and degeneration of the spiral ganglion. In contrast to the auditory tissue, vestibular epithelium looked normal in these patients, in agreement with the lack of vestibular symptoms [44]. Mouse Alms1 mutants show similar phenotypes as human patients, including obesity, retinal dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia, and delayed onset hearing loss [4547]. Hair cells in Alms1 mutant mice show misshapen stereocilia bundles and polarity defects and a loss of outer hair cells with age. Strial atrophy is also seen similar to what was observed in human postmortem samples [44, 47]. Similar to mouse mutants, zebrafish alms1 mutants share many phenotypes with Alström Syndrome patients, including retinal degeneration, kidney and cardiac defects, increased fat disposition in the liver, a propensity for obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and glucose response defects [36]. However, hair cells and the auditory and vestibular systems of these fish have not been examined.

We wished to examine alms1 mutant zebrafish to see if they showed hair cell phenotypes similar to mammalian Alms1 mutants and other zebrafish cilia-associated gene mutants. We found that alms1 mutant zebrafish had normal cilia formation in lateral line hair cells and other ciliated cells similar to what has been observed in mammalian Alms1 mutants. We also failed to find any hair cell phenotypes in these mutants. They showed grossly normal audiovestibular behavior and sensitivity to aminoglycosides as both larvae and adults. They also showed normal FM1-43 uptake into hair cells. These results and the lack of vestibular defects seen in mammals following Alms1 mutations suggest a specific role for Alms1 in the auditory system rather than more global hair cell function. It also shows that cilia-associated genes have distinct roles in different hair cell types.

Materials and methods

Animals

Experiments used either 1 or 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) Danio rerio (zebrafish) larvae or adult zebrafish over three months of age. We used the previously described alms1umd2 mutant line, which causes a premature stop codon [36]. Mutant larvae were generated by either crossing two heterozygous animals together, or one heterozygous animal to a homozygous mutant, and comparing homozygous mutants to either wild-type or heterozygous siblings born at the same time. For the experiments on vibrational stimulus response and adult zebrafish, homozygous mutants were incrossed to generate the mutant animals, and homozygous wild-type siblings of those mutants were crossed to heterozygous wild-type siblings to generate the wild-type controls. Larvae were raised in embryo media (EM) consisting of 1 mM MgSO4, 150 μM KH2PO4, 42 μM Na2HPO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 500 μM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, and 714 μM NaHCO3 and housed in an incubator maintained at 28.5°C with a 14/10 hour light/dark cycle. The Lafayette College Institution Animal Care and Use Committee approved all experiments.

Antibody labeling, imaging, and cilia length measurement

Zebrafish larvae and fins used for antibody labeling were fixed for two hours at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde. Antibody labeling was carried out as previously described [48]. Cilia were labeled with a mouse anti-acetylated tubulin primary antibody (Millipore-Sigma, T7451) diluted at 1:1,000 in antibody block. Larvae used for hair cell counts were labeled with a rabbit anti-parvalbumin primary antibody (ThermoFisher, PA1-933) diluted at 1:1,000 in antibody block. Fins used for hair cell counts were labeled with both the parvalbumin antibody and a mouse anti-otoferlin antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, HCS-1) diluted at 1:100 in antibody block.

Images of antibody labelled larvae and fins were taken on a Zeiss LSM800 confocal microscope. A stack of images 1 μm apart were taken throughout the tissue of interest and then maximum projection images of these stacks were generated for inclusion in the figures. To measure cilia length we chose a representative cilia that we could easily trace in each image and measured the length using Fiji.

Vibrational stimulus response

To test if alms1 mutants would respond to vibrational stimuli we tapped a petri dish containing 50 alms1 mutants with a glass pipette and recorded their response with an iPhone SE. To quantify this behavior we used a modified version of methods previously described [49]. Fish were moved into a fresh petri dish 8 fish at a time. After giving the fish a few minutes to acclimate to the new dish the dish was taped with a glass pipette three times a few seconds apart while recording the response of the fish with an iPhone SE. Videos were then scored with each fish given a score of 0 for no movement in response to the tap and a score of 1 if they moved in response to the tap. Fish that were showing spontaneous movement at the times of any of the taps or that were on the edge of the dish during the experiment were excluded. An average score across the three experiments was generated for each fish.

FM1-43 uptake

Fish were treated with 2.25 μM FM 1-43FX (ThermoFisher, F35355) for 1 minute in EM, washed 3 times in EM, and then anesthetized with MS-222/Tricaine-S (Pentair Aquatic Eco-Systems, TRS1) for imaging. Fish were imaged on a Zeiss LSM800 confocal microscope. For each fish, a single neuromast was imaged by taking a stack of 5 1 μm optical sections. Image analysis was carried out in Fiji. A maximum projection image was made of each stack of images, and the average fluorescent intensity of the cell bodies of the entire neuromast was measured. Additionally, the average fluorescent intensity of an area in the background of the image was measured. Finally, the value for the fluorescence of the neuromast was divided by the value of the background fluorescence. Larvae were euthanized and genotyped after imaging.

Aminoglycoside treatment and hair cell counts

Fish were treated with either neomycin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, N1142) or gentamicin solution (Sigma-Aldrich G1272) at the indicated doses diluted in EM. For all neomycin treatment experiments, fish were treated with neomycin for 30 minutes, washed 3 times in either plain EM for larvae or plain system water for adult fish, left to recover in the third wash for one hour, and then tissue was collected for antibody labeling. In the case of larvae, whole larvae were fixed, whereas for adult fish, the fish were anesthetized, and their caudal fins were amputated and fixed. For gentamicin treatment, larvae were treated with gentamicin for 6 hours, washed 3 times in plain EM, and then fixed for antibody labeling. For adult zebrafish, 6 neuromasts on each fin were counted using the HCS-1 stain, and an average hair cell/neuromast number was generated for each animal. For larvae, the OP1, M2, IO4, MI2, and MI1 neuromasts [50] were counted using the parvalbumin stain, and again an average number of hair cells/neuromast number was generated for each animal. Larvae were genotyped after counting was complete. All hair cell counts were carried out on an Accu-Scope EXC-350 microscope.

Statistical analysis

All statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0).

Results

Cilia morphology is normal in alms1 mutants

There have previously been conflicting results regarding whether ALMS1 plays a role in cilia formation and maintenance. Cilia in Alms1 mutant mice and fibroblasts isolated from Alström syndrome patients appear grossly normal [40, 46, 5153] even when there is no visible antibody labeling for ALMS1 protein [52]. However, RNAi knockdown of Alms1 in cultured cells results in abnormal and stunted cilia [53, 54]. To test what cilia morphology looked like in zebrafish alms1 mutants, we stained 24 hours post fertilization (hpf) and 5dpf zebrafish larvae with acetylated tubulin. We found that cilia morphology looked grossly normal in both early hair cells of the otic vesicle, hair cells of the lateral line and cells of the olfactory pit in alms1 mutants (Fig 1) We also failed to see any early hair cells of the otic vesicle or neuromasts that were missing cilia or obvious gaps of missing cilia in the olfactory pit. Measuring cilia length we did not see any significant differences in the average cilia length in these tissues. We did however, observe an increase in the variability of cilia length in alms1 mutants in the early hair cells in the otic vesicle (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Cilia formation is largely normal in alms1 mutants.

(A) Representative images of the otic vesicle of a 24 hpf wild-type (left) and alms1 mutant (center) zebrafish embryo stained with acetylated tubulin. The arrows point to the cilia of the early hair cells. To the right is quantification of cilia length. There was no significant difference in average kinocilia length between wild-type and mutant zebrafish, however, there was more variation in length seen in alms1 mutants. (p = 0.0065 by F test to compare variances) (B) Representative images of the IO1 neuromast stained with acetylated tubulin in wild-type (left) and alms1 mutant (center) 5dpf zebrafish larvae. The brackets show the position of the kinocilia. Kinocilia appear grossly normal in alms1 mutant fish. To the right is quantification of IO1 kinocilia length. There was no significant difference between wild-type and mutant zebrafish (p = 0.1312 by an unpaired t-test) (C) Representative images of the olfactory pit stained with acetylated tubulin in wild-type (left) and alms1 mutant (center) 5dpf zebrafish larvae. Again cilia appear grossly normal in alms1 mutants. To the right is quantification of cilia length in the olfactory pit. There was no significant difference between wild-type and mutant zebrafish (p = 0.9247 by unpaired t-test). Scale bar for all images = 10 μm. Quantification graphs show individual data points along with the mean and standard deviation of the data, n = 10 fish per group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246844.g001

alms1 mutants do not show mechanotransduction defect phenotypes

Zebrafish mechanotransduction mutants show several characteristic behavioral phenotypes, including a failure to remain upright, circling behavior when swimming, and a failure to respond to acoustic-vibrational stimuli [9]. It has previously been shown that zebrafish morphants of another cilia-associated deafness gene, dcdc2, show similar behavioral defects [26]. We, however, failed to observe any of these phenotypes in alms1 mutant zebrafish. alms1 5dpf mutant larvae remain upright, and those without body morphology defects showed a grossly normal escape response following a vibrational stimulus generated by taping on their dish (S1 Movie and Fig 2). Adult homozygous mutants also showed normal swimming behavior (S2 Movie). The rapid uptake of FM1-43 is also reduced or eliminated when hair cell mechanotransduction activity is impaired [5557]. It has previously been shown that other cilia gene mutants, specifically IFT mutants, show reduced levels of FM1-43 loading into lateral line hair cells [32, 33]. However, we failed to observe any significant differences in FM1-43 loading in alms1 mutants compared to wild-type siblings (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 2. alms1 mutants respond to vibrational stimuli.

Quantification of the number of times fish respond to a vibrational stimuli across three times. A score of 1 means a fish responded all three times whereas a score of 0 means a fish never responded. There was no significant difference between the two groups by an unpaired t-test (p = 0.6977), n = 12 fish per group. Individual data points are shown along with the mean and standard deviation of the data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246844.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. FM1-43 loading is normal in alms1 mutants.

(A) Representative images of neuromasts from wild-type siblings (left) and alms1 mutants (right) treated with FM1-43. Scale bar = 10 μm. (B) Quantification of the fluorescent intensity of FM1-43 in neuromasts of heterozygous wild-type siblings and homozygous alms1 mutants. There was no significant difference between the two groups by an unpaired t-test (p = 0.2474). Individual data points are shown along with the mean and standard deviation of the data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246844.g003

alms1 mutants are not resistant to aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death

It has previously been shown that some zebrafish cilia-associated gene mutants are resistant to aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death, specifically transition zone, including the basal body gene cep290, and IFT gene mutants [3234]. To test if this was also the case for alms1 mutants, we used both short-term neomycin and long-term gentamicin treatment paradigms and quantified hair cell number in 5dpf zebrafish larvae. We failed to see any significant differences between wild-type mutants and homozygous mutants in either control conditions or following aminoglycoside treatment (Fig 4A–4C). Many cilia-associated genes are maternally expressed in zebrafish, meaning a heterozygous mother loads wild-type RNA into the egg, and this can mask mutant phenotypes early in development [5860]. Therefore, we wished to test if this was happening in alms1 mutants by generating mutant larvae out of both heterozygous and homozygous mutant mothers and treating them with neomycin. We again failed to find any significant differences between the different genotypes (Fig 4B).

thumbnail
Fig 4. alms1 mutant larvae are not resistant to aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death.

(A) Dose-response curve for wild-type siblings and alms1 mutants from an incross of heterozygous parents treated with 0–400 μM neomycin for 30 minutes with a one-hour recovery time. n = 7–19 fish per neomycin dose for homozygous wild-type and mutants and 20–25 for heterozygous fish. There were no significant differences due to genotype (p = 0.1273) or the interaction between genotype and neomycin (p = 0.3939) by two-way ANOVA. (B) Dose-response curve for fish that were either heterozygous or homozygous for the alms1 mutation from mothers also either heterozygous or homozygous for the alms1 mutation treated with 0–200 μM neomycin for 30 minutes with a one-hour recovery time. M = maternal genotype and Z = zygotic genotype. n = 7–16 fish per neomycin dose for each genotype. There were no significant differences due to genotype (p = 0.8060) or the interaction between genotype and neomycin (p = 0.2024) by two-way ANOVA. (C) Dose-response curve for wild-type siblings and alms1 mutants from parents heterozygous for the alms1 mutation treated with 0–200 μM gentamicin for 6 hours. n = 10–14 fish per gentamicin dose for homozygous wild-type and mutants and 21–25 for heterozygous fish. There were no significant differences due to genotype (p = 0.9401) or the interaction between genotype and neomycin (p = 0.2850) by two-way ANOVA. Data are shown as mean +/- standard deviation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246844.g004

In human Alström syndrome, patients’ hearing loss is usually not seen until later in childhood [39, 42, 61]. Likewise, hearing defects in Alms1 mutant mice show a delayed onset [4547]. Therefore, we wished to see if adult zebrafish were resistant to aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death even though larvae were not. We treated fish slightly over 3 months of age that appeared to be mature adults (S2 Movie) with neomycin. We again failed to find any significant difference between homozygous mutants and related wild-type fish in either control lateral line hair cell numbers or hair cell numbers following neomycin treatment (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Adult alms1 mutant fish are not resistant to neomycin-induced hair cell death.

(A) Representative images of neuromasts from control (top) and neomycin treated (bottom) fish from wild-type (left) and alms1 mutant (right) fish. (B) Quantification of hair cells/neuromast either in control conditions or following treatment with 200 μM neomycin. Individual data points are shown along with the mean and standard deviation. There were no significant differences due to genotype (p = 0.3073) or the interaction between genotype and neomycin (p = 0.9784) by two-way ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246844.g005

Discussion

Zebrafish have emerged as a useful model to study hair cell function and death in part due to the external location of hair cells in the lateral line system. Multiple genes associated with both syndromic and nonsyndromic forms of deafness have been shown to cause hair cell related phenotypes in zebrafish [10, 11]. This is particularly true for genes affecting mechanotransduction or synaptic activity [62, 63]. However, not all deafness genes have been shown to have phenotypes when mutated in zebrafish, including the cilia-associated gene cdc114 [29]. We found this also to be the case with alsm1. alms1 has previously been shown to be expressed in hair cells of zebrafish larvae and adults [64, 65] as well as showing up in the mature lateral line hair cell cluster in single cell RNA-Seq data [66]. Despite this we noticed no obvious hair cell phenotypes in alms1 zebrafish mutants. Fish showed grossly normal swimming behavior and response to vibrational stimuli, as well as normal hair cell number in contrast to what has previously been shown in mouse Alms1 mutants [47] and human patients [44]. These mutants also showed normal FM1-43 uptake and aminoglycoside toxicity of lateral line hair cells in contrast to what has been seen in other zebrafish cilia-associated gene mutants [3234].

There are multiple explanations for the lack of phenotypes we observed. First, it has previously been shown that CRISPR mutants can show genetic compensation that is not present when genes are merely knocked down [67]. It is also possible that the lack of phenotype we observe is due to a lack of sequence conservation between the mammalian and zebrafish alms1 gene. The majority of the N-terminus of the human ALMS1 gene, encoding for the tandem repeat domain of the protein, is specific to mammals [68, 69] with the first 1560 amino acids of the human gene having no homologous region in the zebrafish gene. However, as the zebrafish mutant shows multiple expected phenotypes due to defects in other tissues [36] if any of these issues were responsible for the lack of phenotype we see, it would have to be relatively hair cell specific. It is also possible that alms1 has an ohnologue compensating for its loss in hair cells. Teleost fish underwent a genome duplication event [70, 71] and other zebrafish hair cell gene mutants have failed to completely phenocopy mammalian mutants due to either ohnologue specific functions or restricted expression of ohnologues [19, 7274]. alms1, however, does not have any known ohnologues in zebrafish [75] and performing a protein blast for the human and zebrafish alms1 gene as well as the ALMS protein motif did not identify any candidate ohnologues. This blast did show the presence of a C10orf90 homologue in zebrafish, which is a known centrosomal gene with an ALMS motif [37, 68], however, this gene is also present in mammals and is not able to compensate for alms1 defects there. We can also not rule out more subtle defects, particularly in inner ear hair cells, that were not observed by the methods we used.

However, we feel the most likely explanation for the lack of observed phenotypes is different roles for alms1 in different hair cell types. While human Alström patients and Alms1 mutant mice show hearing defects and defects in auditory hair cells, there have not been any reported vestibular defects. ALMS1 specifically localizes to the centrosome or basal body of cilia [40, 47] and other basal body proteins have likewise been associated with hearing loss but not vestibular dysfunction [23, 24]. While different hair cell types have many shared genes, there are also many genes that are auditory or vestibular hair cell specific [76, 77]. Comparing lists of highly expressed zebrafish hair cell genes [64, 65] to these lists show overlap with several vestibular hair cell specific genes but no auditory hair cell specific genes. This suggests zebrafish hair cells are more closely related to mammalian vestibular hair cells than auditory hair cells. One of the defects seen in Alms1 mutant hair cells in mammals, is stereocilia polarity [47]. This defect has also been shown in auditory hair cells of other cilia-associated gene mutants [15, 7880]. However, in some cases, these mutants had no polarity defects in vestibular hair cells [79, 80] and these polarity defects have not been seen in lateral line hair cells of zebrafish cilia-associated gene mutants [30, 32]. Therefore, it appears that in mammalian auditory hair cells where the kinocilia, the true cilia of the cell, is lost early in development [81] the primary role of cilia-associated genes has evolved to be determining stereocilia polarity early in development. Whereas, in mammalian vestibular hair cells and zebrafish hair cells, where the kinocilia are maintained, these genes may play other functions that are not yet fully elucidated.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jessica Nesmith and Norann Zaghloul for the alms1 mutant strain, Ivan Cruz for advice on labeling hair cells in adult zebrafish, and Amy Badillo for assistance with zebrafish care.

References

  1. 1. Goman AM, Lin FR. Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2016;106: 1820–1822. pmid:27552261
  2. 2. Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169: 938–944. pmid:19468085
  3. 3. Delmaghani S, El-Amraoui A. Inner Ear Gene Therapies Take Off: Current Promises and Future Challenges. J Clin Med. 2020;9: 2309. pmid:32708116
  4. 4. Van Camp G, Smith R. Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage. [cited 1 Nov 2020]. Available: https://hereditaryhearingloss.org/
  5. 5. Eppsteiner RW, Smith RJH. Genetic disorders of the vestibular system. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19: 397–402. pmid:21825995
  6. 6. Gallego-Martinez A, Espinosa-Sanchez JM, Lopez-Escamez JA. Genetic contribution to vestibular diseases. Journal of Neurology. Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH and Co. KG; 2018. pp. S29–S34. pmid:29582143
  7. 7. Malicki J, Schier AF, Solnica-Krezel L, Stemple DL, Neuhauss SCF, Stainier DYR, et al. Mutations affecting development of the zebrafish ear. Development. 1996;123: 275–283. pmid:9007247
  8. 8. Whitfield TT, Granato M, Van Eeden FJM, Schach U, Brand M, Furutani-Seiki M, et al. Mutations affecting development of the zebrafish inner ear and lateral line. Development. 1996;123: 241–254. pmid:9007244
  9. 9. Nicolson T, Rüsch A, Friedrich RW, Granato M, Ruppersberg JP, Nüsslein-Volhard C. Genetic Analysis of Vertebrate Sensory Hair Cell Mechanosensation: the Zebrafish Circler Mutants. Neuron. 1998;20: 271–283. pmid:9491988
  10. 10. Blanco-Sánchez B, Clément A, Phillips JB, Westerfield M. Zebrafish models of human eye and inner ear diseases. Methods Cell Biol. 2017;138: 415–467. pmid:28129854
  11. 11. Vona B, Doll J, Hofrichter MAH, Haaf T, Varshney GK. Small fish, big prospects: using zebrafish to unravel the mechanisms of hereditary hearing loss. Hear Res. 2020;397: 107906. pmid:32063424
  12. 12. Reiners J, Nagel-Wolfrum K, Jürgens K, Märker T, Wolfrum U. Molecular basis of human Usher syndrome: deciphering the meshes of the Usher protein network provides insights into the pathomechanisms of the Usher disease. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83: 97–119. pmid:16545802
  13. 13. Alstrom C, Hallgren B, Nilsson L, Asander H. Retinal degeneration combined with obesity, diabetes mellitus and neurogenous deafness: a specific syndrome (not hitherto described) distinct from the Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl syndrome: a clinical, endocrinological and genetic examination based on a lar. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand Suppl. 1959;129: 1–35. pmid:13649370
  14. 14. Girard D, Petrovsky N. Alström syndrome: Insights into the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. Nat Rev Endocrinol; 2011. pp. 77–88. pmid:21135875
  15. 15. Ross AJ, May-Simera H, Eichers ER, Kai M, Hill J, Jagger DJ, et al. Disruption of Bardet-Biedl syndrome ciliary proteins perturbs planar cell polarity in vertebrates. Nat Genet. 2005;37: 1135–1140. pmid:16170314
  16. 16. Esposito G, Testa F, Zacchia M, Crispo AA, Di Iorio V, Capolongo G, et al. Genetic characterization of Italian patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome and correlation to ocular, renal and audio-vestibular phenotype: Identification of eleven novel pathogenic sequence variants. BMC Med Genet. 2017;18: 10. pmid:28143435
  17. 17. Ernest S, Rauch GJ, Haffter P, Geisler R, Petit C, Nicolson T. Mariner is defective in myosin VIIA: A zebrafish model for human hereditary deafness. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9: 2189–2196. pmid:10958658
  18. 18. Söllner C, Rauch G-J, Siemens J, Geisler R, Schuster SC, Müller U, et al. Mutations in cadherin 23 affect tip links in zebrafish sensory hair cells. Nature. 2004;428: 955–959. pmid:15057246
  19. 19. Seiler C, Finger-Baier KC, Rinner O, Makhankov Y V., Schwarz H, Neuhauss SCF, et al. Duplicated genes with split functions: Independent roles of protocadherin 15 orthologues in zebrafish hearing and vision. Development. 2005;132: 615–623. pmid:15634702
  20. 20. Riazuddin S, Belyantseva IA, Giese APJ, Lee K, Indzhykulian AA, Nandamuri SP, et al. Alterations of the CIB2 calcium-and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48. Nat Genet. 2012;44: 1265–1271. pmid:23023331
  21. 21. Ogun O, Zallocchi M. Clarin-1 acts as a modulator of mechanotransduction activity and presynaptic ribbon assembly. J Cell Biol. 2014;207: 375–91. pmid:25365995
  22. 22. Ebermann I, Phillips JB, Liebau MC, Koenekoop RK, Schermer B, Lopez I, et al. PDZD7 is a modifier of retinal disease and a contributor to digenic Usher syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2010;120: 1812–1823. pmid:20440071
  23. 23. Khateb S, Zelinger L, Mizrahi-Meissonnier L, Ayuso C, Koenekoop RK, Laxer U, et al. A homozygous nonsense CEP250 mutation combined with a heterozygous nonsense C2orf71 mutation is associated with atypical Usher syndrome. J Med Genet. 2014;51: 460–469. pmid:24780881
  24. 24. Nikopoulos K, Farinelli P, Giangreco B, Tsika C, Royer-Bertrand B, Mbefo MK, et al. Mutations in CEP78 Cause Cone-Rod Dystrophy and Hearing Loss Associated with Primary-Cilia Defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99: 770–776. pmid:27588451
  25. 25. Namburi P, Ratnapriya R, Khateb S, Lazar CH, Kinarty Y, Obolensky A, et al. Bi-allelic Truncating Mutations in CEP78, Encoding Centrosomal Protein 78, Cause Cone-Rod Degeneration with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99: 777–784. pmid:27588452
  26. 26. Grati M, Chakchouk I, Ma Q, Bensaid M, DeSmidt A, Turki N, et al. A missense mutation in DCDC2 causes human recessive deafness DFNB66, likely by interfering with sensory hair cell and supporting cell cilia length regulation. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24: 2482–2491. pmid:25601850
  27. 27. Delmaghani S, Aghaie A, Bouyacoub Y, El Hachmi H, Bonnet C, Riahi Z, et al. Mutations in CDC14A, Encoding a Protein Phosphatase Involved in Hair Cell Ciliogenesis, Cause Autosomal-Recessive Severe to Profound Deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98: 1266–1270. pmid:27259055
  28. 28. Li P, He Y, Cai G, Xiao F, Yang J, Li Q, et al. CCDC114 is mutated in patient with a complex phenotype combining primary ciliary dyskinesia, sensorineural deafness, and renal disease. J Hum Genet. 2018;64: 39–48. pmid:30291279
  29. 29. Imtiaz A, Belyantseva IA, Beirl AJ, Fenollar-Ferrer C, Bashir R, Bukhari I, et al. CDC14A phosphatase is essential for hearing and male fertility in mouse and human. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27: 780–798. pmid:29293958
  30. 30. Kindt KS, Finch G, Nicolson T. Kinocilia mediate mechanosensitivity in developing zebrafish hair cells. Dev Cell. 2012;23: 329–341. pmid:22898777
  31. 31. Tsujikawa M, Malicki J. Intraflagellar Transport Genes Are Essential for Differentiation and Survival of Vertebrate Sensory Neurons. Neuron. 2004;42: 703–716. pmid:15182712
  32. 32. Stawicki TM, Hernandez L, Esterberg R, Linbo T, Owens KN, Shah AN, et al. Cilia-associated genes play differing roles in aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death in zebrafish. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2016;6: 2225–2235. pmid:27207957
  33. 33. Stawicki TM, Linbo T, Hernandez L, Parkinson L, Bellefeuille D, Rubel EW, et al. The role of retrograde intraflagellar transport genes in aminoglycoside-induced hair cell death. Biol Open. 2018. pmid:30578252
  34. 34. Owens KN, Santos F, Roberts B, Linbo T, Coffin AB, Knisely AJ, et al. Identification of genetic and chemical modulators of zebrafish mechanosensory hair cell death. PLoS Genet. 2008;4: e1000020. pmid:18454195
  35. 35. Sedykh I, TeSlaa JJ, Tatarsky RL, Keller AN, Toops KA, Lakkaraju A, et al. Novel roles for the radial spoke head protein 9 in neural and neurosensory cilia. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 34437. pmid:27687975
  36. 36. Nesmith JE, Hostelley TL, Leitch CC, Matern MS, Sethna S, McFarland R, et al. Genomic knockout of alms1 in zebrafish recapitulates Alström syndrome and provides insight into metabolic phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28: 2212–2223. pmid:31220269
  37. 37. Collin GB, Marshall JD, Ikeda A, So WV, Russell-Eggitt I, Maffei P, et al. Mutations in ALMS1 cause obesity, type 2 diabetes and neurosensory degeneration in Alström syndrome. Nat Genet. 2002;31: 74–78. pmid:11941369
  38. 38. Hearn T, Renforth GL, Spalluto C, Hanley NA, Piper K, Brickwood S, et al. Mutation of ALMS1, a large gene with a tandem repeat encoding 47 amino acids, causes Alström syndrome. Nat Genet. 2002;31: 79–83. pmid:11941370
  39. 39. Marshall JD, Bronson RT, Collin GB, Nordstrom AD, Maffei P, Paisey RB, et al. New Alström syndrome phenotypes based on the evaluation of 182 cases. Archives of Internal Medicine. American Medical Association; 2005. pp. 675–683. pmid:15795345
  40. 40. Hearn T, Spalluto C, Phillips VJ, Renforth GL, Copin N, Hanley NA, et al. Subcellular localization of ALMS1 supports involvement of centrosome and basal body dysfunction in the pathogenesis of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54: 1581–1587. pmid:15855349
  41. 41. Marshall JD, Ludman MD, Shea SE, Salisbury SR, Willi SM, LaRoche RG, et al. Genealogy, natural history, and phenotype of Alström Syndrome in a large Acadian kindred and three additional families. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Wiley-Liss Inc.; 1997. pp. 150–161.
  42. 42. Lindsey S, Brewer C, Stakhovskaya O, Kim HJ, Zalewski C, Bryant J, et al. Auditory and otologic profile of Alström syndrome: Comprehensive single center data on 38 patients. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2017;173: 2210–2218. pmid:28573831
  43. 43. Bahmad F, Costa CSA, Teixeira MS, de Barros Filho J, Viana LM, Marshall J. Familial Alström syndrome: a rare cause of bilateral progressive hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80: 99–104. pmid:24830966
  44. 44. Nadol JB, Marshall JD, Bronson RT. Histopathology of the human inner ear in Alström’s syndrome. Audiol Neurotol. 2015;20: 267–272. pmid:26111748
  45. 45. Arsov T, Silva DG, O’Bryan MK, Sainsbury A, Lee NJ, Kennedy C, et al. Fat aussie—A new Alström syndrome mouse showing a critical role for ALMS1 in obesity, diabetes, and spermatogenesis. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20: 1610–1622. pmid:16513793
  46. 46. Collin GB, Cyr E, Bronson R, Marshall JD, Gifford EJ, Hicks W, et al. Alms1-disrupted mice recapitulate human Alströ m syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14: 2323–2333. pmid:16000322
  47. 47. Jagger D, Collin G, Kelly J, Towers E, Nevill G, Longo-Guess C, et al. Alström Syndrome protein ALMS1 localizes to basal bodies of cochlear hair cells and regulates cilium-dependent planar cell polarity. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20: 466–481. pmid:21071598
  48. 48. Stawicki TM, Owens KN, Linbo T, Reinhart KE, Rubel EW, Raible DW. The zebrafish merovingian mutant reveals a role for pH regulation in hair cell toxicity and function. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7: 847–856. pmid:24973752
  49. 49. Koleilat A, Dugdale JA, Christenson TA, Bellah JL, Lambert AM, Masino MA, et al. L-type voltage-gated calcium channel agonists mitigate hearing loss and modify ribbon synapse morphology in the zebrafish model of Usher syndrome type 1. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13: dmm043885. pmid:33361086
  50. 50. Raible DW, Kruse GJ. Organization of the lateral line system in embryonic zebrafish. J Comp Neurol. 2000;421: 189–198. pmid:10813781
  51. 51. Collin GB, Marshall JD, King BL, Milan G, Maffei P, Jagger DJ, et al. The alström syndrome protein, ALMS1, interacts with α-actinin and components of the endosome recycling pathway. PLoS One. 2012;7: e37925. pmid:22693585
  52. 52. Chen JH, Geberhiwot T, Barrett TG, Paisey R, Semple RK. Refining genotype–phenotype correlation in Alström syndrome through study of primary human fibroblasts. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017;5: 390–404. pmid:28717663
  53. 53. Li G, Vega R, Nelms K, Gekakis N, Goodnow C, McNamara P, et al. A role for Alström syndrome protein, Alms1, in kidney ciliogenesis and cellular quiescence. PLoS Genet. 2007;3: e8. pmid:17206865
  54. 54. Graser S, Stierhof YD, Lavoie SB, Gassner OS, Lamla S, Le Clech M, et al. Cep164, a novel centriole appendage protein required for primary cilium formation. J Cell Biol. 2007;179: 321–330. pmid:17954613
  55. 55. Gale JE, Marcotti W, Kennedy HJ, Kros CJ, Richardson GP. FM1-43 dye behaves as a permeant blocker of the hair-cell mechanotransducer channel. J Neurosci. 2001;21: 7013–7025. pmid:11549711
  56. 56. Meyers JR, MacDonald RB, Duggan A, Lenzi D, Standaert DG, Corwin JT, et al. Lighting up the senses: FM1-43 loading of sensory cells through nonselective ion channels. J Neurosci. 2003;23: 4054–4065. pmid:12764092
  57. 57. Seiler C, Nicolson T. Defective calmodulin-dependent rapid apical endocytosis in zebrafish sensory hair cell mutants. J Neurobiol. 1999;41: 424–434. pmid:10526320
  58. 58. Huang P, Schier AF. Dampened Hedgehog signaling but normal Wnt signaling in zebrafish without cilia. Development. 2009;136: 3089–98. pmid:19700616
  59. 59. Duldulao NA, Lee S, Sun Z. Cilia localization is essential for in vivo functions of the Joubert syndrome protein Arl13b/Scorpion. Development. 2009;136: 4033–42. pmid:19906870
  60. 60. Cao Y, Park A, Sun Z. Intraflagellar transport proteins are essential for cilia formation and for planar cell polarity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21: 1326–33. pmid:20576807
  61. 61. Michaud JL, Heon E, Guilbert F, Weill J, Puech B, Benson L, et al. Natural history of Alstrom syndrome in early childhood: Onset with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Pediatr. 1996;128: 225–229. pmid:8636816
  62. 62. Nicolson T. Ribbon synapses in zebrafish hair cells. Hearing Research. Elsevier B.V.; 2015. pp. 170–177. pmid:25916266
  63. 63. Nicolson T. The genetics of hair-cell function in zebrafish. J Neurogenet. 2017;31: 102–112. pmid:28705044
  64. 64. Barta CL, Liu H, Chen L, Giffen KP, Li Y, Kramer KL, et al. RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis of adult zebrafish inner ear hair cells. Sci Data. 2018;5: 180005. pmid:29406519
  65. 65. Erickson T, Nicolson T. Identification of sensory hair-cell transcripts by thiouracil-tagging in zebrafish. BMC Genomics. 2015;16: 842. pmid:26494580
  66. 66. Lush ME, Diaz DC, Koenecke N, Baek S, Boldt H, St Peter MK, et al. scRNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive hair cell regeneration after loss of Fgf and Notch signaling. Elife. 2019;8. pmid:30681411
  67. 67. Rossi A, Kontarakis Z, Gerri C, Nolte H, Hölper S, Krüger M, et al. Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature. 2015;524: 230–233. pmid:26168398
  68. 68. Knorz VJ, Spalluto C, Lessard M, Purvis TL, Adigun FF, Collin GB, et al. Centriolar association of ALMS1 and likely centrosomal functions of the ALMS motif-containing proteins C10orf90 and KIAA1731. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21: 3617–3629. pmid:20844083
  69. 69. Hearn T. ALMS1 and Alström syndrome: a recessive form of metabolic, neurosensory and cardiac deficits. J Mol Med. 2019;97: 1–17. pmid:30421101
  70. 70. Taylor JS, Braasch I, Frickey T, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22,000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 2003;13: 382–390. pmid:12618368
  71. 71. Prince VE, Pickett FB. Splitting pairs: The diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nature Reviews Genetics. Nat Rev Genet; 2002. pp. 827–837. pmid:12415313
  72. 72. Erickson T, Pacentine I V., Venuto A, Clemens R, Nicolson T. The lhfpl5 Ohnologs lhfpl5a and lhfpl5b Are Required for Mechanotransduction in Distinct Populations of Sensory Hair Cells in Zebrafish. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;12: 320. pmid:32009898
  73. 73. Lv C, Stewart WJ, Akanyeti O, Frederick C, Zhu J, Santos-Sacchi J, et al. Synaptic Ribbons Require Ribeye for Electron Density, Proper Synaptic Localization, and Recruitment of Calcium Channels. Cell Rep. 2016;15: 2784–2795. pmid:27292637
  74. 74. Chou S-W, Chen Z, Zhu S, Davis RW, Hu J, Liu L, et al. A molecular basis for water motion detection by the mechanosensory lateral line of zebrafish. Nat Commun. 2017;8: 2234. pmid:29269857
  75. 75. Singh PP, Isambert H. OHNOLOGS v2: A comprehensive resource for the genes retained from whole genome duplication in vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48: D724–D730. pmid:31612943
  76. 76. Burns JC, Kelly MC, Hoa M, Morell RJ, Kelley MW. Single-cell RNA-Seq resolves cellular complexity in sensory organs from the neonatal inner ear. Nat Commun. 2015;6: 8557. pmid:26469390
  77. 77. Scheffer DI, Shen J, Corey DP, Chen ZY. Gene expression by mouse inner ear hair cells during development. J Neurosci. 2015;35: 6366–6380. pmid:25904789
  78. 78. May-Simera HL, Ross A, Rix S, Forge A, Beales PL, Jagger DJ. Patterns of expression of Bardet-Biedl syndrome proteins in the mammalian cochlea suggest noncentrosomal functions. J Comp Neurol. 2009;514: 174–88. pmid:19396898
  79. 79. Jones C, Roper VC, Foucher I, Qian D, Banizs B, Petit C, et al. Ciliary proteins link basal body polarization to planar cell polarity regulation. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 69–77. pmid:18066062
  80. 80. Sipe CW, Lu X. Kif3a regulates planar polarization of auditory hair cells through both ciliary and non-ciliary mechanisms. Development. 2011;138: 3441–3449. pmid:21752934
  81. 81. Lim DJ, Anniko M. Developmental morphology of the mouse inner ear. A scanning electron microscopic observation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1985;422: 1–69. pmid:3877398