Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Collection Review

The effect of capsule tension ring on posterior capsule opacification: A meta-analysis

  • Kaikai Zhang,

    Affiliation Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    ⨯
  • Yuchen Dong,

    Affiliation Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    ⨯
  • Meisheng Zhao ,

    zhaoms1961@sina.com

    Affiliation Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    ⨯
  • Lili Nie,

    Affiliation Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    ⨯
  • Xinfen Ding,

    Affiliation Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    ⨯
  • Chao Zhu

    Affiliation Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

Posterior capsule opacification is one of the most common complications after cataract surgery. Studies have suggested that the introduction of a capsule tension ring might play a critical role in the prevention of capsule opacification, yet quantitative evidence is still lacking. This work consists of a meta-analysis on available data in order to explore the influence of a capsule tension ring on posterior capsule opacification.

Methods

A comprehensive review of the literature on capsule tension ring and posterior capsule opacification was carried out using the Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane electronic databases. The selected studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies and prospective studies published before June 2020. The studies of interest were selected by two reviewers independently from the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMD) were used in order to assess the association. A fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was applied to combine data according to heterogeneities. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies. Publication bias was estimated using the Egger test. Statistical analysis was performed using the stata15.1 software.

Results

The meta-analysis included in total 8 studies involving 379 cases and 333 controls. There was a statistically significant difference of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate (OR=0.241, 95% CI: 0.145, 0.400 I2=42.1%) between the capsule tension ring group and the control group, indicating that the tension ring reduced the Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate. Further studies with continuous data also revealed that the use of capsule tension ring was associated with a lower posterior capsule opacification score (SMD = -1.402, 95% CI: -2.448, -0.355 I2=95.0%). The sensitivity analysis suggested that the result of the re-combined analysis did not change notably, indicating that the result was reliable and stable. Both pooled analysis showed no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusion

The findings of this meta-analysis confirmed that capsule tension ring might reduce capsule opacification. Further studies should be made to validate the result.

Citation: Zhang K, Dong Y, Zhao M, Nie L, Ding X, Zhu C (2021) The effect of capsule tension ring on posterior capsule opacification: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0246316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316

Editor: Ahmed Awadein, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EGYPT

Published: March 15, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All related files are available from the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science database.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Posterior capsule opacification(PCO) is the most common postoperative complication after cataract surgery and can often cause vision loss [1]. The visual acuity loss due to posterior capsule opacification accounts for 20-40 percent of all patients, 2 to 5 years after cataract surgery and has become the second most common cause of visual loss [1,2]. Posterior capsule opacification development is attributed to the residual lens epithelial cells (LECs) in the capsular bag after cataract surgery that experience proliferation, migration, metaplasia, differentiation and opacification [3–5]. Nd:YAG capsulotomy is currently the only effective treatment of PCO [6]. However, the measure could potentially cause vision-threatening complications including increasing intraocular pressure, IOL damage, cystoid macular edema and retinal detachment [7]. Currently, a number of techniques have been used clinically to prevent posterior capsule opacification that include improving surgical techniques, different IOL materials and designs or administrating specific pharmacological agents [8–12].

Leger and Witschel in 1993, were the first to implant a capsule tension ring into the human eye during a cataract surgery. The ring was inserted to maintain postoperatively the shape of the capsular bag in case of zonular weakness or loss [13]. During a complex cataract surgery, zonular weakness is treated with the help of a capsule tension ring that improves safety and success [14,15]. In the case of zonular dehiscence or defect, however, cataract surgeons are often unable to comply adequate hydrodissection and effective cortical aspiration leading to lens epithelial cells remaining longer in the capsular bag. Residual lens epithelial cells lead to an increased chance of posterior capsule opacification. The use of a capsule tension ring is reported to not only stabilize the capsular bag and IOL position, but also to significantly reduce posterior capsule opacification [16,17].

Despite the fact that the benefit of a capsule tension ring in the reduction of posterior capsule opacification has been reported in a several studies [18–20]. There still has not been a meta-analysis on the association between the use of a capsule tension ring and posterior capsule opacification. Therefore, this study aims to quantify the effect capsule tension ring on posterior capsule opacification.

Materials and methods

Search strategy and study selection

The meta-analysis was done strictly based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [21]. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically for related studies that were published before June 2020 for the search terms “equator rings”, “tension rings”, “bending rings”, “capsule opacification”. In the first instance, selection of the studies was done on the basis of titles and abstracts by two reviewers (KKZ and YCD) and, subsequently, the reviewers screened the full text using the inclusion criteria. The references of selected papers were hand-searched further to expand the study sample. Any issues regarding study selection were resolved with the assistance of the third author (MSZ).

Inclusion criteria

The selected studies had to meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) studies on the association between the use of a capsule tension ring and posterior capsule opacification; (2) study designs were limited to randomized controlled trial, retrospective study and prospective analysis; (3) intervention: IOL and CTR were implanted in capsular bag during cataract surgery; control: only IOL was implanted in capsular bag during cataract surgery; (4) original studies quantitatively reporting the posterior capsule opacification outcome.

Exclusion criteria

(1) unavailability of the selected studies;(2) studies without controlled group;(3) intraocular lens was implanted into capsule bag. (4) studies were in vitro. (5) meeting, abstract, review, case report.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two reviewers (KKZ and YCD) independently collected the relevant data based on a standardized data extraction form. The collected content includes the first author’s name, publication date, country, sample size, study design, major outcome (PCO score and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate). The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to determine the non-randomized study’s quality [22]. The stars that met at least five were deemed to be high quality. Any issues were settled through consultation with the third author (MSZ).

Statistical analysis

Stata15.1 software was used to perform all the statistical analysis. Categorical data, such as the Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy rate, were pooled in odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data, such as the PCO score, were analyzed using mean differences (MD) with 95% CI. The I2 value was used to describe heterogeneity among studies. When heterogeneity was observed (I2>50%), the random-effect model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis estimates. The Egger test assessed the potential publication bias [23]. Significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The complete procedure of study selection is presented in Fig 1. A total of 170 articles were identified using the four academic databases, of which 87 records were eliminated as duplicates. Subsequently, 49 citations were removed after evaluating their titles and abstracts. The residual 34 full-text essays were further evaluated for their eligibility. Among them, 26 articles were excluded for the following reasons: 7 studies were in vitro, 3 were of incomplete text, 13 were not controlled and 3 were inserted in sulcus. Finally, 8 items [24–31] met the inclusion criteria and were included for quantitative analysis. Selected studies involved in total 379 cases and 333 controls. The sample size ranged from 44 to 153. There were 8 articles published between 2001 and 2014. Among the induced studies, 5 were from Asia, and 3 were from Europe. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the selected studies and the score of the quality assessment.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Flow diagram.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Characteristics of the selected studies and quality assessment score.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316.t001

Statistical analysis

Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate: The meta-analysis included a total of 7 studies involving 357 cases and 311 controls [24–31]. No significant heterogeneity was discovered in the combined analysis (I2 = 42.1%), therefore a fixed-effect model was chosen to reduce heterogeneity. According to the pooled results, the capsule tension ring patients exhibited a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate than the control group. (OR=0.241, 95% CI: 0.145, 0.400 I2=42.1%) (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Forest plot of the effect of capsule tension ring on capsulotomy rate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316.g002

PCO score: The meta-analysis contained a total of 5 studies involving 195 cases and 192 controls [25,27–29,31]. Obvious heterogeneity was detected in the pooled analysis (I2 = 95.0%), so a randomized effect model was applied to reduce errors. The pooled results revealed that the capsule tension ring patients had lower PCO scores than the control group (SMD = -1.402, 95% CI: -2.448, -0.355 I2=95.0%) (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Forest plot of the effect of a capsule tension ring on PCO score.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316.g003

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

Sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially omitting single studies. The heterogeneity was similar before and after the study exclusion, indicating that the meta-analysis was stable and reliable. The Egger test showed no clear publication bias in the analysis of the Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate (Egger test P =0.981) and the PCO score (Egger test P =0.355) (Figs 4 and 5).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Sensitivity analysis for capsule on capsulotomy rate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316.g004

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Sensitivity analysis for capsule on PCO score.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246316.g005

Discussion

Cataract surgery with zonular deficiency increased the risk of capsular tears, IOL decentration, vitreous loss [32]. Formerly, cataract with zonular weakness considered extracapsular cataract extraction, intracapsular cataract extraction or pars plana lensectomy. So, Hara firstly described capsule tension ring to support zonular comprise in 1991 [33]. A train of studies had investigated that capsule tension ring not only increased the safety of cataract surgery, but also reduced posterior capsule opacification [34–37]. Hence, we gathered the related studies and executed the meta-analysis to define the value of capsule tension ring on PCO.

Our meta-analysis consisted of 8 studies involving 379 cases and 333 controls, revealing that capsule tension ring was beneficial to reduce capsulotomy rate and PCO score. When PCO score was combined, there was significant heterogeneity in pooled results and, therefore, a randomized-effect model was chosen to reduce heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis showed that the result of the re-combined analysis did not change significantly, indicating that the result was stable. The Egger test did not find visible publication bias in the analysis of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate and the PCO score. In the past, cataract surgery with zonular weakness often did not clear cortex which caused the rising of posterior capsule opacification. Some studies found that capsule tension ring not only enhanced the safety of cataract surgery, but also reduced posterior capsule opacification. In addition, studies indicated that capsule tension ring also increased the stability of intraocular lens and vision [38].

There are several candidates to explain the mechanisms of capsule opacification reduction when using a capsule tension ring: first, it is thought to reduce largely the lens-capsule distance and make cortical clean-up easier during cataract surgery by posterior capsule stretching [39–41]. Second, the uniform and discontinuous capsule bending along the optical edge is believed to inhibit the migration of LECs [42,43]. Finally, the ring is thought to move the anterior capsular leaf away from the anterior optic surface and the posterior capsule [44].

It needs to be noted, however, that in this work there are several points to be considered: first, the content of the research was restricted solely to published studies, and therefore articles not yet published or gray literature with a possibility of satisfying inclusion criteria were not included. Also, the pooled results exhibited heterogeneity; the sensitivity analysis still did not reveal the source of this heterogeneity and subgroup analysis and meta-regression were not conducted further. Finally, the included samples only contained 712 patients which meant potential publication bias.

Conclusions

In summary, it was found out that the use of a capsule tension ring in cataract surgery leads to a less Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate and PCO score. However, further research using larger samples, multiple centers, and high-quality studies are necessary to verify our results.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.com/) for the expert linguistic services provided.

References

  1. 1. Awasthi N, Guo S, Wagner BJ. Posterior capsular opacification: a problem reduced but not yet eradicated. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;127(4):555–62. pmid:19365040
  2. 2. Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Werner L, Maloof AJ, Milverton EJ. Posterior capsule opacification: a review of the aetiopathogenesis, experimental and clinical studies and factors for prevention. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun;52(2):99–112. pmid:15283214
  3. 3. Kappelhof JP, Vrensen GF. The pathology of after-cataract. A minireview. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1992;(205):13–24. pmid:1332409
  4. 4. Apple DJ, Solomon KD, Tetz MR, Assia EI, Holland EY, Legler UF, et al. Posterior capsule opacification. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep-Oct;37(2):73–116. pmid:1455302
  5. 5. Thompson AM, Sachdev N, Wong T, Riley AF, Grupcheva CN, McGhee CN. The Auckland Cataract Study: 2 year postoperative assessment of aspects of clinical, visual, corneal topographic and satisfaction outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;88(8):1042–8. pmid:15258022
  6. 6. Apple DJ, Peng Q, Visessook N, Werner L, Pandey SK, Escobar-Gomez M, et al. Eradication of posterior capsule opacification: documentation of a marked decrease in Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy rates noted in an analysis of 5416 pseudophakic human eyes obtained postmortem. Ophthalmology. 2001 Mar;108(3):505–18. pmid:11237905
  7. 7. Aslam TM, Devlin H, Dhillon B. Use of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov-Dec;48(6):594–612. pmid:14609706
  8. 8. Leishman L, Werner L, Bodnar Z, Ollerton A, Michelson J, Schmutz M, et al. Prevention of capsular bag opacification with a modified hydrophilic acrylic disk-shaped intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1664–70. pmid:22795975
  9. 9. Hazra S, Palui H, Vemuganti GK. Comparison of design of intraocular lens versus the material for PCO prevention. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(1):59–63. pmid:22553756
  10. 10. Ollerton A, Werner L, Fuller SR, Kavoussi SC, McIntyre JS, Mamalis N. Evaluation of a new single-piece 4% water content hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in the rabbit model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1827–32. pmid:22920504
  11. 11. Wormstone IM, Wang L, Liu CS. Posterior capsule opacification. Exp Eye Res. 2009 Feb;88(2):257–69. pmid:19013456
  12. 12. Walker TD. Pharmacological attempts to reduce posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery--a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;36(9):883–90. pmid:19278485
  13. 13. Legler UFC, Witschel BM. The Capsular Ring: A New Device for Complicated Cataract Surgery. 1994.
  14. 14. Jacob S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Patel N, Lal V. Efficacy of a capsular tension ring for phacoemulsification in eyes with zonular dialysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Feb;29(2):315–21. pmid:12648643
  15. 15. Weber CH, Cionni RJ. All about capsular tension rings. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;26(1):10–5. pmid:25390861
  16. 16. Hara T, Hara T, Yamada Y. "Equator ring" for maintenance of the completely circular contour of the capsular bag equator after cataract removal. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991 Jun;22(6):358–9. pmid:1896178
  17. 17. Schild AM, Rosentreter A, Hellmich M, Lappas A, Dinslage S, Dietlein TS. Effect of a capsular tension ring on refractive outcomes in eyes with high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Dec;36(12):2087–93. pmid:21111311
  18. 18. Nagamoto T, Bissen-Miyajima H. A ring to support the capsular bag after continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994 Jul;20(4):417–20. pmid:7932131
  19. 19. Haripriya A, Ramulu PY, Schehlein EM, Shekhar M, Chandrashekharan S, Narendran K, et al. The Aravind Pseudoexfoliation Study: 5-Year Postoperative Results. The Effect of Intraocular Lens Choice and Capsular Tension Rings. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;219:253–260. pmid:32621898
  20. 20. Luft N, Kreutzer TC, Dirisamer M, Priglinger CS, Burger J, Findl O, et al. Evaluation of laser capsule polishing for prevention of posterior capsule opacification in a human ex vivo model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2739–45. pmid:26796455
  21. 21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41. pmid:20171303
  22. 22. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;25(9):603–5. pmid:20652370
  23. 23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629–34. pmid:9310563
  24. 24. Keles S, Kartal B, Apil A, Ondas O, Dertsiz Kozan B, Topdagi E, et al. Nd: YAG laser posterior capsulotomy rates in myopic eyes after implantation of capsular tension ring. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Aug 18;20:1469–73. pmid:25132225
  25. 25. Halili I, Mutlu FM, Erdurman FC, Gündogan FC, Kilic S. Influence of capsular tension ring on posterior capsule opacification in myopic eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;62(3):311–5. pmid:24008791
  26. 26. Kim JH, Kim H, Joo CK. The effect of capsular tension ring on posterior capsular opacity in cataract surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;19(1):23–8. pmid:15929483
  27. 27. Menapace R, Sacu S, Georgopoulos M, Findl O, Rainer G, Nishi O. Efficacy and safety of capsular bending ring implantation to prevent posterior capsule opacification: three-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1318–28. pmid:18655983
  28. 28. Nishi O, Nishi K, Menapace R, Akura J. Capsular bending ring to prevent posterior capsule opacification: 2 year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Sep;27(9):1359–65. pmid:11566516
  29. 29. Takimoto M, Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Effect of a capsular tension ring on prevention of intraocular lens decentration and tilt and on anterior capsule contraction after cataract surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep-Oct;52(5):363–367. pmid:18991036
  30. 30. D’Eliseo D, Pastena B, Longanesi L, Grisanti F, Negrini V. Prevention of posterior capsule opacification using capsular tension ring for zonular defects in cataract surgery.Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;13(2):151–4. pmid:12696634
  31. 31. Zhao JY, Ning Y, Ma LW, Zhang JS. Effects of capsular tension ring on PCO formation in hypermyopia patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2009. 9(2): 298–300.
  32. 32. Blecher MH, Kirk MR. Surgical strategies for the management of zonular compromise. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;19(1):31–5. pmid:18090895
  33. 33. Hara T, Hara T, Yamada Y. "Equator ring" for maintenance of the completely circular contour of the capsular bag equator after cataract removal. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991 Jun;22(6):358–9. pmid:1896178
  34. 34. Haripriya A, Ramulu PY, Schehlein EM, Shekhar M, Chandrashekharan S, Narendran K, et al, Ramakrishnan R, Ravindran RD, Robin AL. The Aravind Pseudoexfoliation Study: 5-Year Postoperative Results. The Effect of Intraocular Lens Choice and Capsular Tension Rings. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;219:253–260. Epub 2020 Jul 2. pmid:32621898.
  35. 35. Vasavada AR, Praveen MR, Vasavada VA, Yeh RY, Srivastava S, Koul A, Trivedi RH. Cionni ring and in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation for subluxated lenses: a prospective case series. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;153(6):1144–53.e1. Epub 2012 Feb 7. pmid:22317913.
  36. 36. Nishi O, Nishi K, Mano C, Ichihara M, Honda T. The inhibition of lens epithelial cell migration by a discontinuous capsular bend created by a band-shaped circular loop or a capsule-bending ring. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Feb;29(2):119–25. pmid:9507255.
  37. 37. Jacob S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Patel N, Lal V. Efficacy of a capsular tension ring for phacoemulsification in eyes with zonular dialysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Feb;29(2):315–21. pmid:12648643
  38. 38. Buttanri IB, Sevim MS, Esen D, Acar BT, Serin D, Acar S. Modified capsular tension ring implantation in eyes with traumatic cataract and loss of zonular support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Mar;38(3):431–6. pmid:22265183
  39. 39. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Bobr B, Bittermann S, Vass C, et al. Accurate determination of effective lens position and lens-capsule distance with 4 intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Aug;24(8):1094–8. pmid:9719969
  40. 40. Gimbel HV, Sun R, Heston JP. Management of zonular dialysis in phacoemulsification and IOL implantation using the capsular tension ring. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997 Apr;28(4):273–81. pmid:9101564
  41. 41. Schaumberg DA, Dana MR, Christen WG, Glynn RJ. A systematic overview of the incidence of posterior capsule opacification. Ophthalmology. 1998 Jul;105(7):1213–21. pmid:9663224
  42. 42. Hashizoe M, Hara T, Ogura Y, Sakanishi K, Honda T, Hara T. Equator ring efficacy in maintaining capsular bag integrity and transparency after cataract removal in monkey eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 May;236(5):375–9. pmid:9602322
  43. 43. Nishi O, Nishi K, Mano C, Ichihara M, Honda T. The inhibition of lens epithelial cell migration by a discontinuous capsular bend created by a band-shaped circular loop or a capsule-bending ring. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Feb;29(2):119–25. pmid:9507255
  44. 44. Menapace R, Findl O, Georgopoulos M, Rainer G, Vass C, Schmetterer K. The capsular tension ring: designs, applications, and techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Jun;26(6):898–912. pmid:10889438