Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Tai Chi practitioners have lower fall risks under dual-task conditions during stair descending

  • Yang Li,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Physical Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    ⨯
  • Qipeng Song ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    songqipeng@sdpei.edu.cn

    Affiliation College of Sports and Health, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, Shandong, China

    ⨯
  • Li Li,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Wei Sun,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition

    Affiliation College of Sports and Health, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, Shandong, China

    ⨯
  • Cui Zhang

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Project administration

    Affiliation Lab of Biomechanics, Shandong Institute of Sport Science, Jinan, Shandong, China

    ⨯

Abstract

Stairs are among the most hazardous locations, and stair descending contributes to a high risk of falls among the elderly under dual-task (DT) conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the practitioners of Tai Chi (TC), one type of mind-body exercise, have lower fall risks under DT conditions during stair descending, compared with their no-exercise (NE) counterparts. Fifteen TC practitioners with at least 10 years of experience in TC and fifteen NE participants were recruited in this study. They were asked to descend a six-step staircase under single-task (ST) and DT conditions. An eight-camera motion analysis system and two force plates were used for data collection. Results showed group by DT interactions in walking velocity (p = 0.016) and center of mass–center of pressure inclination angle (COM–COP IA) in the anteroposterior directions (p = 0.026). Group effects observed with foot clearance (p = 0.031), trunk (p = 0.041) and head (p = 0.002) tilt angles, and COM–COP IA in the mediolateral (p = 0.006) directions. Significant DT effects only detected in foot clearance (p = 0.004). Although both groups of participants adopted a more cautious gait strategy under the dual-task condition, the TC practitioners were less influenced by the DT paradigm than their NE counterparts. Our observations indicated that TC practitioners have lower fall risks under DT conditions during stair descending.

Citation: Li Y, Song Q, Li L, Sun W, Zhang C (2021) Tai Chi practitioners have lower fall risks under dual-task conditions during stair descending. PLoS ONE 16(2): e0246292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246292

Editor: Nili Steinberg, The Wingate College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences at the Wingate Institute, IL, ISRAEL

Received: June 4, 2020; Accepted: January 15, 2021; Published: February 4, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files

Funding: Q.S.:China Shandong Key Research and Development Plan (2017G006043), and China Scholarship Council (201809370020). W.S.:Natural Science Foundation of China (31700815)

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Taking the stairs is common in daily life; 10% of home accidents [1], 14% of occupational injuries related to work surfaces [2], and 26% of self-reported falls occur on stairs [3]. The continuously increasing number of the stair-related injuries [4] has made stairs one of the most hazardous locations for fall accidents [5] and the leading cause of accidental death for the elderly [3]. Stair descending accounts for 75% of falls among the elderly in communities [6]. Compared with level walking, stair descending demands high lower limb joint range of motion [7] and muscle strength [8], imposes a significant challenge to postural control in the elderly [9].

Some variables were related to falls during stair negotiation, like walking velocity, foot clearance, trunk and head tilt angles, and center of mass-center of pressure inclination angle (COM-COP IA). The component responsible for the lower margin of stability in the elderly was the higher velocity of the COM leading to a more anterior position of the extrapolated COM in relation to the edge of the step. A higher walking velocity increases the difficulty of postural control in the anterior direction among older adults [8]. Catching the foot on the stair edge and foot misplacement on the stair are the main causes of trips during stair descending [10]. Trips can be avoided by maintaining foot clearance greater than zero on any given step [11]. In the event of an overstep, increased forward upper body tilt angles (trunk or head tilt angles) in the sagittal plane put forward higher requirements on postural control during stair descending. This is particularly important for older adults, in light of the significant age-related changes in neuromuscular function which would challenge one’s ability to counter the forward momentum of the upper body when it is placed further forward due to trunk flexion [12]. Measurement of the body’s COM motion relative to the COP is essential for quantifying postural control because their relative positions are directly related to the COM’s gravitational moment, which should be counterbalanced to prevent the whole body from falling [13]. The direction of the COM-COP vector can be described by the angle formed by the vertical and the projection of the vector onto the sagittal and frontal planes, termed COM-COP IA [14].

In a dual-task (DT) paradigm, the introduction of a concurrent task (mostly a cognitive task) during a primary task (mostly a physical task) leads to possible competition among the attentional resources available [15]. The risk of falls increases while performing a concurrent cognitive DT, such as talking, calculating, and reasoning [9], by increasing stride time variability [16], decreasing the extremity joint range of motion [17], and decreasing foot clearance during stair waking [18]. Among the elderly, postural control impairment under DT conditions is a common occurrence [19]. Impaired postural control under DT conditions predicts adverse outcomes, such as falls [20]. Previous research indicated that physical tasks’ difficulty influences DT performance [21], and this effect might be higher in older adults than in young adults [22].

Exercise has been proven effective in preventing falls and decreasing the risk of falls, and one of its most popular forms is Tai Chi (TC) [23]. TC, often described as “moving meditation,” encompasses physical and mental elements [24]; integrates training in balance, flexibility, and neuromuscular coordination with several cognitive components, including heightened body goal-oriented training; and may result in benefits to reducing fall risks and improving cognitive performance [16]. However, the potential of TC as a mind-body exercise to reduce fall risks under DT conditions has not received considerable attention.

The ability to maintain balance under DT conditions is dependent on the efficiency of attentional resources [17], which controls physical and cognitive task performances. Interference between two tasks suggests that shared attentional resources may involve the regulation of postural control and cognitive performance. Research utilizing the DT paradigm can provide new insights into the interactions between them [22]. Evidence suggests that multimodal training that integrates physical and cognitive elements may be more effective than any one-element intervention [25]. TC can improve DT performance as a multimodal mind-body exercise that incorporates physical, cognitive, social, and meditative components. However, a limited number of existing studies have provided the scientific basis and therapeutic impetus to explore further the cognitive and physical benefits of TC [26]. At present, no drug therapy has been proven to delay preclinical cognitive deterioration [27]. If certain exercises are confirmed to work, then they would benefit the elderly population. We hypothesized that TC practitioners have lower fall risks under DT conditions during stair descending, compared with their NE counterparts.

Materials and methods

Participants

A priori power analysis (G*Power Version 3.1) indicates that a minimum of 9 participants are needed in each group to obtain the alpha level of 0.05 and the beta level of 0.80 based on a previous report that compared the COM-COP IA between DT and ST conditions during stair descending [28]. In the current study, 30 elderly participants were recruited after distributing flyers and providing presentations in a local community in Jinan, China. Of the 25 participants, 13 were amateur TC practitioners, with TC experience of 19.7±6.4 years, and 12 were no-exercise (NE) practitioners (See Table 1). All participants were right foot dominant; that is, they prefer the right leg in kicking a football. The inclusion criteria were age≥65 years, regularly practiced TC for at least 10 years for half an hour per day three times a week for TC practitioners, and three months of no specific exercise (total exercise time should be less than 1 h per week) for NE participants. The exclusion criteria were inability to follow instructions, unstable heart conditions, joint replacements in the lower extremities, arthritis, diabetes, visual deficits, vestibular deficits, falls in the last 3 years, or any type of neuromuscular problems that could prevent the participants from meeting the project requirements. Independent t-tests showed no significant differences in age, height, and body mass between groups. All the practitioners signed approved informed consent forms prior to participation. The use of human participants in this study was approved by the Internal Review Board of Shandong Sport University (2017SC-014) and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of practitioners in TC and control groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246292.t001

Lab setting and testing protocol

A cast-iron staircase with six steps was constructed for data collection. The step dimensions were 17.0 cm (riser) × 29 cm (tread). Two force platforms (KISTLER, 9287BA and 9281CA, Switzerland) were embedded in the third and fourth steps of the staircase to collect ground reaction force data at a sample rate of 1,000 Hz [29]. The stair descending test was recorded by an eight-camera motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics Ltd., England) at 100 Hz. The Vicon system synchronized the force platforms and motion analysis system. The participants were asked to ascend the staircase in a step-over-step manner under two conditions. Condition 1 (ST) included stair descending only, and condition 2 (DT) included stair descending while subtracting the serial sevens from a three-digit number [18]. Before the tests, the participants were allowed to warm up by walking for 400 m at a self-selected velocity. They were then asked to ascend and descend the staircase several times to familiarize themselves. During the test, each participant was asked to perform five successful stair descending trials. A successful stair descending trial was defined as a trial in which the participant continuously ascended from the top to the end of the staircase. The participants had 1 min to rest after each trial. Each participant used the same pair of shoes for all testing sessions.

Variables

Walking velocity was calculated as the displacement of the COM divided by step time. Foot clearance was calculated as the vertical distance between the heel marker and stair edge when the heel marker was above the edge [30]. Head/trunk tilt angle was defined as the maximal angle between the head/trunk longitudinal axis and the horizontal plane projected to the sagittal plane [29]; a positive angle indicated leaning forward. COM-COP IA was determined as the instantaneous orientation of the line connecting the COM and COP with respect to a vertical line through the COP [31]. The COP position was calculated using forces measured by the force plate. The anterior (+)/posterior (-) positions of the COM and COP are described parallel to the direction of progression. The medial (left)/lateral (right) positions of COM and COP are described relative to the line of progression [32]. IA in anterior/posterior and medial/lateral was calculated correspondingly (see below). In this study, we examined the maximum IA during a single-support phase, an unstable period in which one can easily fall [33].

The anterior/posterior COM-COP IA (α) and the medial/lateral COM-COP IA (β) were calculated as follows [34]: (1) (2) (3) where COM–COP is the vector pointing from COP to COM, and vertical is the unit vector of the vertical axis of the global coordinate system.

Data reduction

All variables were obtained from the Vicon system and then exported to Microsoft Excel 2016 for further calculation. A 13-segment whole-body model, from which body COM was obtained using segment anthropometric data, was established [35]. Kinematics data were obtained on the stride beginning with foot contact with the fourth step of the staircase and ending with the same foot contact with the second step. Kinetics data were obtained on the right foot contact with the third or fourth step. All kinetics data were normalized by body weight. The kinematic data were down-sampled to match the sampling rate with the kinetic data. The kinematics and kinetics data included a fourth-order low-pass Butterworth filter with cutoff frequencies of 7 Hz [36] and 50 Hz [37], respectively.

Statistical analysis

The normality of all outcome variables was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The mean and standard deviations for the variables above were subjected to descriptive analysis. A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to determine the effects of the group and the DT paradigm on each outcome variable. Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc analysis was conducted when the significant group–DT interactions were detected. Partial eta squared (η2p) was used to represent the effect size of the two-way ANOVA’s main effects and interactions. The thresholds for η2p are as follows: 0.01–0.06, small; 0.06–0.14, moderate; and >0.14, large [38]. Cohen’s d was used to represent the effect size of the post hoc comparison. The thresholds for Cohen’s d are as follows: <0.20, trivial; 0.21–0.50, small; 0.51–0.80, medium; >0.81, large [39].

Results

The Shapiro–Wilk test indicated that all the dependent variables were normally distributed (p>0.05). Fig 1 presents the outcomes of the kinematic variables during stair descending. Significant group–DT interactions were detected in walking velocity (p = 0.016, η2p = 0.226). Under the DT and ST conditions, the TC practitioners had a larger foot clearance (p = 0.031, η2p = 0.187), a smaller trunk (p = 0.041, η2p = 0.169) and head (p = 0.002, η2p = 0.340) tilt angles than the NE practitioners. The TC practitioners had a higher walking velocity (p = 0.016, Cohen’s d = 1.027) under the ST conditions than the NE practitioners under the DT condition. Under the DT condition, the TC and NE practitioners increased their foot clearance (p = 0.040, η2p = 0.171) relative to those under the ST conditions. Under the DT conditions, the TC practitioners decreased their walking velocity (p = 0.007, Cohen’s d = 1.730) relative to those under the ST condition.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Kinematic variables during stair decent.

TC: Tai Chi, NE: no-exercise, DT: dual task, and ST: single task. a: Significant difference between the DT and ST conditions among the TC practitioners. b: Significant difference between TC and NE participants under the ST conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246292.g001

Fig 2 presents the COM–COP IA in the anteroposterior (a) and mediolateral (b) directions. In the anteroposterior directions, a significant group–DT interaction was detected (p = 0.026, η2p = 0.198). Under the DT conditions, the NE practitioners showed an increased COM–COP IA relative to that under the ST condition (p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.346). TC practitioners had a smaller COM-COP IA under the DT (p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 1.166) and ST (p<0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.163) conditions. In the mediolateral directions, the TC practitioners had a smaller COM-COP IA than the NE practitioners (p = 0.005, η2p = 0.297) under the DT and ST conditions.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Center of mass–center of pressure inclination angle (COM–COP IA).

TC: Tai Chi group, NE: no-exercise group. COM-COP AI: Center of Mass-Center of Pressure Inclination Angle. AP: anteroposterior direction, ML: mediolateral direction. a: Significant difference between the DT and ST conditions among the NE practitioners. b: Significant difference between the TC and NE practitioners under the DT conditions. c: Significant difference between the TC and NE practitioners under the ST conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246292.g002

Discussion

We aimed to investigate the effects of TC exercise on reducing fall risks of the elderly during stair descending under DT conditions. The results support our hypothesis that TC practitioners have lower fall risks under DT conditions during stair descending, compared with their NE counterparts.

Our outcomes indicated that the lower fall risks under the DT condition among the TC practitioners might be related to some of their unique gait strategies, such as decreased walking velocity. Lower walking velocity decreases the difficulty in controlling stability during stair descending [40]. Long-term TC practitioners have been reported to decrease their walking velocity when the ambient brightness decreases [40]; our outcome agrees with their viewpoint that TC practitioners attempt to stabilize themselves by decreasing their gait velocity under challenging conditions.

Compared with the NE practitioners, the TC practitioners had higher foot clearance under the DT and ST conditions during stair descending. Falls generally occur after tripping on a stair edge [41]. A high foot clearance decreases the risk of catching a heel on the stair edge during the swing phase, thereby decreasing the likelihood of a trip [10]. In this work, the TC and NE practitioners took a more cautious gait strategy under the DT condition than under the ST condition, as represented by the increased foot clearance. A previous study pointed out that TC practitioners do not increase their foot clearance under challenging conditions, i.g., low illumination condition [40]. The difference between our study and the previous one may be attributed to the different responses of the elderly under the DT and low illumination conditions.

During TC, practitioners generally raise their legs and stay still for a relatively long period. The regular practice of these movements may increase foot clearance during stair descending. In the present study, the TC practitioners had lower head and trunk tilt angles than the NE practitioners. Excessive head and trunk tilt angles would move the COM forward, put forward higher requirements on postural control in the anterior direction during stair descending. Practitioners generally keep their trunks erect, and they control their posture with low limb movements during TC exercise. These movements in TC exercise may be applied to stair descending when TC practitioners held their heads and kept their trunks erect under DT and ST conditions.

COP through the feet and the COM of the body are commonly used to reflect postural control. Researchers have proposed that the COM and COP’s collaborative interpretation can provide a better assessment than examining COM or COP separately [42]. COM-COP IA, formed by the vertical line and the projection of the vector onto the sagittal and frontal planes [14], was proposed to provide a more comprehensive assessment than the examination of COM or COP [43], because COM or COP measures may not necessarily indicate instability [43], and COM-COP separation, was not normalized to leg length or body height [44]. When one lifts the foot to the desired direction, postural stability is challenged because the base of support is drastically reduced. If the COM is not repositioned above the new base of support, a gap between the COM and COP would be created, and the whole body would fall towards the swing leg side [45]. Greater IA leads to an increase in moment arm of force, which further increases inertia and momentum of the body segments for balance recovery [43]. The greater the IA, the further the COM diverges from the COP, and the more difficult it is to bring the COM above the COP [34]. If the COM and COP become separated extensively and consequently prevent the lower-limb joint moments from supporting upright posture, falls can occur [33]. Extensive research has proved that TC practitioners have greater postural stability than NE practitioners under ST conditions [46]; The current study fills the gap by demonstrating that TC practitioners have lower fall risks under DT conditions.

The increase in COM–COP IA in the anteroposterior directions among the NE practitioners indicated that their postural stability decreased under the DT condition. By contrast, the COM-COP IA remained unchanged among the TC practitioners. The decreased postural stability among the NE practitioners could be explained by a neuroimaging study, which suggested that gait and cognitive tasks may share a network of brain regions in the frontal and parietal cortex, often referred to as the frontoparietal executive control network [47]. Gait is not automatic; it requires attentional resources from the high brain center [18]. DT-related gait changes can result from the interference caused by a competition between the attention demands under the DT condition. Combined interventions, such as mind-body exercise in TC, have been confirmed to improve executive function [16], which refers to cognitive processes that orchestrate goal-directed activities and allocate attentional resources in competing tasks. Improved executive function can coordinate the competition between the attention demands by physical and cognitive tasks to reduce fall risks under DT conditions.

Postural control is related to the complex interactions between peripheral sensory input and motor processes modulated by CNS [48]. Proprioception and cutaneous sensitivity are primary components of the somatosensory system [49], which contributes 60%–70% for postural control, while visual and vestibular systems contribute to the rest [50, 51]. It has been documented that practicing Tai Chi could enhance both the proprioception [52] and the cutaneous sensitivity [53] among older adults. Furthermore, one of our previous studies indicated that Tai Chi practitioners had a better white matter integrity in the splenium of corpus callosum than their controllers, and inferred that the Tai Chi induced microstructure changes in CNS tissue are linked with memory and cognition improvements [54]. TC practitioners may take advantage of their CNS function and sensory input systems to “feel” the landing process and maintain postural stability during stair descending.

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the cognitive task used in this dual-task study has employed verbal responses. However, respiration changes during speech production are known to produce changes in postural control [55]. Secondly, the cognitive performance during the dual-task was not assessed, and therefore the trade-off between cognitive and balance tasks cannot be determined. Thirdly, the visual system condition was not well controlled in our study, which may alter the participants’ motor performance [56]. Finally, only the physical–cognitive combination under the TC exercise can be verified to fall risks under the DT condition. Carrying out a study containing single physical and cognitive exercises would help verify whether a combination exercise has a greater effect than a single physical exercise on reducing fall risks.

Future studies should first overcome these limitations. We recommend further studies containing physical (such as walking or jogging), cognition (such as meditation) and body-cognitive combination (such as Tai Chi or yoga) exercises should be conducted, to identify the benefits of each category of exercise style to reducing fall risks, and further provide objective rehabilitation programmes for the cognitively impaired population.

Conclusions

Although both groups of participants adopted a more cautious gait strategy under the dual-task condition, the TC practitioners were less influenced by the DT paradigm than their NE counterparts. Our observations indicated that TC practitioners have lower fall risks under DT conditions during stair descending.

Acknowledgments

We thank Huawei Qiu, Fantong Meng, and Peixin Shen, graduate students at Shandong Sport University, for helping with the data collection.

References

  1. 1. Cohen HH, John T, John A. An analysis of occupational stair accident patterns. Journal of Safety Research. 1985;16(4):171–81.
  2. 2. Roys MS. Serious stair injuries can be prevented by improved stair design. Applied Ergonomics. 2001;32(2):135–9. pmid:11277505
  3. 3. Buckley JG, Heasley K, Scally A, Elliott DB. The effects of blurring vision on medio-lateral balance during stepping up or down to a new level in the elderly. Gait Posture. 2005;22(2):146–53. pmid:16139750.
  4. 4. Blazewick DH, Chounthirath T, Hodges NL, Collins CL, Smith GA. Stair-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2018;36(4):608–14. pmid:28947224.
  5. 5. Cayless SM. Slip, trip and fall accidents: relationship to building features and use of coroners’ reports in ascribing cause. Appl Ergon. 2001;32(2):155–62. pmid:11277508.
  6. 6. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(26):1701–7. pmid:3205267.
  7. 7. Qu X. Effects of lower-limb muscular fatigue on stair gait. J Biomech. 2015;48(15):4059–64. pmid:26477407.
  8. 8. Bosse I, Oberlander KD, Savelberg HH, Meijer K, Bruggemann GP, Karamanidis K. Dynamic stability control in younger and older adults during stair descent. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(6):1560–70. pmid:22853941.
  9. 9. Ojha HA, Kern RW, Lin CH, Winstein CJ. Age affects the attentional demands of stair ambulation: evidence from a dual-task approach. Physical therapy. 2009;89(10):1080–8. pmid:19661159.
  10. 10. Zietz D, Johannsen L, Hollands M. Stepping characteristics and Centre of Mass control during stair descent: Effects of age, fall risk and visual factors. Gait Posture. 2011;34(2):279–84. pmid:21680187.
  11. 11. Barrett RS, Mills PM, Begg RK. A systematic review of the effect of ageing and falls history on minimum foot clearance characteristics during level walking. Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):429–35. pmid:20692163.
  12. 12. Novak AC, Komisar V, Maki BE, Fernie GR. Age-related differences in dynamic balance control during stair descent and effect of varying step geometry. Appl Ergon. 2016;52:275–84. pmid:26360219.
  13. 13. Woollacott MH, Tang PF. Balance control during walking in the older adult: research and its implications. Physical therapy. 1997;77(6):646–60. pmid:9184689.
  14. 14. Lu HL, Kuo MY, Chang CF, Lu TW, Hong SW. Effects of gait speed on the body’s center of mass motion relative to the center of pressure during over-ground walking. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;54:354–62. pmid:28688302.
  15. 15. Simoni D, Rubbieri G, Baccini M, Rinaldi L, Becheri D, Forconi T, et al. Different motor tasks impact differently on cognitive performance of older persons during dual task tests. Clinical biomechanics. 2013;28(6):692–6. pmid:23791081.
  16. 16. Wayne PM, Hausdorff JM, Lough M, Gow BJ, Lipsitz L, Novak V, et al. Tai Chi Training may Reduce Dual Task Gait Variability, a Potential Mediator of Fall Risk, in Healthy Older Adults: Cross-Sectional and Randomized Trial Studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:332. pmid:26106316; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4460804.
  17. 17. Madehkhaksar F, Egges A. Effect of dual task type on gait and dynamic stability during stair negotiation at different inclinations. Gait Posture. 2016;43:114–9. pmid:26410477.
  18. 18. Vallabhajosula S, Tan CW, Mukherjee M, Davidson AJ, Stergiou N. Biomechanical analyses of stair-climbing while dual-tasking. J Biomech. 2015;48(6):921–9. pmid:25773590; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4567248.
  19. 19. Silsupadol P, Shumway-Cook A, Lugade V, van Donkelaar P, Chou LS, Mayr U, et al. Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2009;90(3):381–7. pmid:19254600; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2768031.
  20. 20. Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Allali G, Berrut G, Dubost V. Dual task-related changes in gait performance in older adults: a new way of predicting recurrent falls? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(1):181–2. pmid:18184219.
  21. 21. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Experimental brain research. 1993;97(1):139–44. pmid:8131825.
  22. 22. Kelly VE, Janke AA, Shumway-Cook A. Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Experimental brain research. 2010;207(1–2):65–73. pmid:20931180; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3058115.
  23. 23. Li F, Harmer P, Fisher KJ, McAuley E, Chaumeton N, Eckstrom E, et al. Tai Chi and fall reductions in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2005;60(2):187–94. pmid:15814861.
  24. 24. Li F, Harmer P, Fisher KJ, Xu J, Fitzgerald K, Vongjaturapat N. Tai Chi-based exercise for older adults with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot-program evaluation. Journal of aging and physical activity. 2007;15(2):139–51. pmid:17556781.
  25. 25. Burgener SC, Yang Y, Gilbert R, Marsh-Yant S. The effects of a multimodal intervention on outcomes of persons with early-stage dementia. American journal of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. 2008;23(4):382–94. pmid:18453642; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3014218.
  26. 26. Li F, Harmer P, Liu Y, Chou LS. Tai Ji Quan and global cognitive function in older adults with cognitive impairment: a pilot study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;58(3):434–9. pmid:24398166; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3949139.
  27. 27. Lam LC, Chan WM, Kwok TC, Chiu HF. Effectiveness of Tai Chi in maintenance of cognitive and functional abilities in mild cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20(3 Suppl 3):20–3. pmid:25001031.
  28. 28. Song Q, Sun W, Zhang C, Mao M, Li L. Effects of a Dual-Task Paradigm and Gait Velocity on Dynamic Gait Stability during Stair Descent. Applied ences. 2020;10(6):1979.
  29. 29. Song Q, Yu B, Zhang C, Sun W, Mao D. Effects of backpack weight on posture, gait patterns and ground reaction forces of male children with obesity during stair descent. Research in sports medicine. 2014;22(2):172–84. pmid:24650337.
  30. 30. Zhang C, Mao D, Riskowski JL, Song Q. Strategies of stepping over obstacles: The effects of long-term exercise in older adults. Gait Posture. 2011;34(2):191–6. pmid:21601460.
  31. 31. Lee HJ, Chou LS. Detection of gait instability using the center of mass and center of pressure inclination angles. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2006;87(4):569–75. pmid:16571399.
  32. 32. Chien HL, Lu TW, Liu MW. Effects of long-term wearing of high-heeled shoes on the control of the body’s center of mass motion in relation to the center of pressure during walking. Gait Posture. 2014;39(4):1045–50. pmid:24508016.
  33. 33. Pijnappels M, van der Burg PJ, Reeves ND, van Dieen JH. Identification of elderly fallers by muscle strength measures. European journal of applied physiology. 2008;102(5):585–92. pmid:18071745; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2226001.
  34. 34. Chien HL, Lu TW, Liu MW. Control of the motion of the body’s center of mass in relation to the center of pressure during high-heeled gait. Gait Posture. 2013;38(3):391–6. pmid:23337731.
  35. 35. Mian OS, Narici MV, Minetti AE, Baltzopoulos V. Centre of mass motion during stair negotiation in young and older men. Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):463–9. pmid:17158049.
  36. 36. Sheehan RC, Gottschall JS. At similar angles, slope walking has a greater fall risk than stair walking. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(3):473–8. pmid:21843878.
  37. 37. McCrory JL, Chambers AJ, Daftary A, Redfern MS. Ground reaction forces during stair locomotion in pregnant fallers and non-fallers. Clinical biomechanics. 2014;29(2):143–8. pmid:24359627.
  38. 38. Pierce CAB, R.A.; Aguinis H. Cautionary note on reporting Eta-Squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2004;64:916–24.
  39. 39. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science: Science Direct; 1988. 490 p.
    • 40. Song Q, Tian X, Wong D, Zhang C, Sun W, Cheng P, et al. Effects of Tai Chi Exercise on body stability among the elderly during stair descent under different levels of illumination. Research in sports medicine. 2017;25(2):197–208. pmid:28367687.
    • 41. Hamel KA, Okita N, Higginson JS, Cavanagh PR. Foot clearance during stair descent: effects of age and illumination. Gait Posture. 2005;21(2):135–40. pmid:15639391.
    • 42. Hsue BJ, Su FC. Effects of age and gender on dynamic stability during stair descent. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2014;95(10):1860–9. pmid:24835752.
    • 43. Hsue BJ, Miller F, Su FC. The dynamic balance of the children with cerebral palsy and typical developing during gait. Part I: Spatial relationship between COM and COP trajectories. Gait Posture. 2009;29(3):465–70. pmid:19111469.
    • 44. Lu HL, Lu TW, Lin HC, Hsieh HJ, Chan WP. Effects of belt speed on the body’s center of mass motion relative to the center of pressure during treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2017;51:109–15. pmid:27744249.
    • 45. Yiou E, Caderby T, Delafontaine A, Fourcade P, Honeine JL. Balance control during gait initiation: State-of-the-art and research perspectives. World journal of orthopedics. 2017;8(11):815–28. pmid:29184756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5696609.
    • 46. Song Q, Wang S, Wong DP, Zhou J, Sun W, Zhang C, et al. Long-term Tai Chi exercise increases body stability of the elderly during stair ascent under high and low illumination. Sports Biomech. 2018;17(3):402–13. pmid:28877658.
    • 47. Zhou J, Hao Y, Wang Y, Jor’dan A, Pascual-Leone A, Zhang J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces the cost of performing a cognitive task on gait and postural control. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39(8):1343–8. pmid:24443958; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4221849.
    • 48. Chalmers GR, Knutzen KM. Soleus H-reflex gain in healthy elderly and young adults when lying, standing, and balancing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(8):B321–9. pmid:12145358.
    • 49. Li L, Zhang S, Dobson J. The contribution of small and large sensory afferents to postural control in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Journal of sport and health science. 2019;8(3):218–27. pmid:31193300; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6523875.
    • 50. Wiesmeier IK, Dalin D, Maurer C. Elderly Use Proprioception Rather than Visual and Vestibular Cues for Postural Motor Control. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2015;7:97. pmid:26157386; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4477145.
    • 51. Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. Journal of neurophysiology. 2002;88(3):1097–118. pmid:12205132.
    • 52. Zhang C, Sun W, Yu B, Song Q, Mao D. Effects of exercise on ankle proprioception in adult women during 16 weeks of training and eight weeks of detraining. Research in sports medicine. 2015;23(1):102–13. pmid:25274460.
    • 53. Li L, Manor B. Long term Tai Chi exercise improves physical performance among people with peripheral neuropathy. The American journal of Chinese medicine. 2010;38(3):449–59. pmid:20503464.
    • 54. Yao J, Song Q, Zhang K, Hong Y, Li W, Mao D, et al. The effect of Tai Chi practice on brain white matter structure: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Research in sports medicine. 2019;27(1):121–30. pmid:30051735.
    • 55. Dault MC, Yardley L, Frank JS. Does articulation contribute to modifications of postural control during dual-task paradigms? Cognitive Brain Research. 2003;16(3):434–40. pmid:12706223
    • 56. Delafontaine A, Hansen C, Marolleau I, Kratzenstein S, Gouelle A. Effect of a Concurrent Cognitive Task, with Stabilizing Visual Information and Withdrawal, on Body Sway Adaptation of Parkinsonian’s Patients in an Off-Medication State: A Controlled Study. Sensors. 2020;20(18). pmid:32899926; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7571225.