https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7442-8809
Figures
Abstract
Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels have been associated with disease and survival status in septic humans and dogs. To date, studies investigating cfDNA levels in association with critical illness in foals are lacking. We hypothesized that cfDNA would be detectable in the plasma of foals, that septic and sick-nonseptic foals would have significantly higher cfDNA levels compared to healthy foals, and that increased cfDNA levels would be associated with non-survival. Animals used include 80 foals of 10 days of age or less admitted to a tertiary referral center between January and July, 2020 were stratified into three categories: healthy (n = 34), sick non-septic (n = 11) and septic (n = 35) based on specific criteria. This was a prospective clinical study. Blood was collected from critically ill foals at admission or born in hospital for cfDNA quantification and blood culture. Previously published sepsis score (SS) and neonatal SIRS score (NSIRS) were also calculated. SS, NSIRS, blood culture status and cfDNA concentrations were evaluated to predict survival. Continuous variables between groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc test. Comparisons between two groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test or Spearman rank for correlations. The performance of cfDNA, sepsis score and NSIRS score to predict survival was assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis including area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity using cutoffs. Plasma cfDNA was detectable in all foals. No significant differences in cfDNA concentration were detected between healthy foals and septic foals (P = 0.65) or healthy foals and sick non-septic foals (P = 0.88). There was no significant association between cfDNA and culture status, SS, NSIRS or foal survival. SS (AUC 0.85) and NSIRS (AUC 0.83) were superior to cfDNA (AUC 0.64) in predicting survival. Although cfDNA was detectable in foal plasma, it offers negligible utility to diagnose sepsis or predict survival in critical illness in neonates.
Citation: Colmer SF, Luethy D, Abraham M, Stefanovski D, Hurcombe SD (2021) Utility of cell-free DNA concentrations and illness severity scores to predict survival in critically ill neonatal foals. PLoS ONE 16(4): e0242635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242635
Editor: Simon Clegg, University of Lincoln, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: December 14, 2020; Accepted: April 13, 2021; Published: April 26, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Colmer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was funded by the ACVIM 2019-2020 Resident Research Grant (grant number 775360) as well as the Raymond Firestone Trust Grant / New Bolton Center internal funding (grant number 461612-5875). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Sepsis is the most common cause of neonatal foal mortality and is broadly defined by an overwhelming systemic inflammatory response syndrome triggered by infectious organisms [1]. A myriad of factors are involved in the pathophysiology of neonatal sepsis, including maternal disease, parturition complications and management practices [2]. The clinical signs observed in sepsis overlap with many other non-infectious, life-threatening conditions, and due to this ambiguity, diagnosis proves difficult until the disease become severe [3]. Recent studies show septic foals still have a high mortality rate of 30–50% despite improved survival with medical advances [4, 5].
The gold standard for the detection of bacteremia is blood culture which exhibits low sensitivity in neonates at approximately 61.9% [6]. False negative blood cultures in septic foals as well as positive blood cultures documented in healthy foals, further complicate the interpretation of results [7, 8]. Blood cultures regularly require up to one week before they can be considered diagnostic. Scoring systems were developed in the 1980s using blood culture and clinical findings to expedite and predict a diagnosis of sepsis in foals. These scoring systems incorporated both subjective and objective clinical and clinicopathologic findings and have yielded varying diagnostic accuracy suggesting variation within at-risk foal populations at different times and locations [9].
Recent studies in human and veterinary medicine have shown the prognostic value of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the blood of septic patients [10–12]. cfDNA is proposed to be released from various cell types during apoptosis and necrosis, and thought to be involved in host defense systems with the intent to trap and kill bacteria [13]. Previously, quantification of cfDNA was a labor- and cost-intensive process involving DNA isolation, extraction, gel electrophoresis and real-time PCR [14]. More recently, rapid and direct fluorescence assays have been developed that use nucleotide-binding fluorophores to identify cfDNA directly within biological fluids [14–16].
In humans, cfDNA concentrations have proven to be sensitive and specific for poor outcomes [17, 18]. One study analyzing 255 patients with severe disease revealed that admission cfDNA concentrations were higher in ICU non-survivors than in survivors [18]. A 2017 study assessing cfDNA concentrations in dogs using fluorometric assays found significantly higher concentrations in those presenting to an emergency service with sepsis or non-septic SIRS compared to healthy dogs [19]. Though the body of cfDNA research is growing in both human and veterinary medicine, there are no studies documenting its utility in equine neonatal sepsis to the authors’ knowledge.
We believe that cfDNA may have diagnostic and prognostic utility for diagnosing sepsis in critically ill foals. We hypothesized that cfDNA would be detectable in the plasma of newborn foals and that the magnitude of cfDNA concentrations would be proportional to the severity of illness. Our specific aims were to measure and compare cfDNA without DNA extraction from healthy, sick non-septic and septic foals at admission to or born in the hospital. Further, we wanted to determine if there is an association between cfDNA concentrations and detectable bacteremia as well as previously published critical illness scoring systems, namely sepsis score and neonatal systemic inflammatory syndrome score [20]. Finally, we sought to determine if cfDNA concentrations and illness severity score could predict survival in critically ill foals.
Materials and methods
Study population
The study population consisted of foals ≤ 10 days of age who were either admitted to or born at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine New Bolton Center between January and July 2020. Inclusion criteria required the results of a blood culture performed within 24 hours of admission, documentation of either discharge from the hospital or non-survival, and recorded physical examination and clinicopathological parameters for the implementation of the updated sepsis scoring system and neonatal SIRS (NSIRS) scoring system published by Wong et al. in 2018 [20]. Foals were excluded if they were > 10 days of age and did not have a blood culture performed during hospitalization. All experimental procedures were approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol # 806836, and undertaken with informed client consent. The IACUC specifically reviewed and approved that the study would not influence treatment protocols of individual cases. Humane endpoints were not predefined as part of the study protocol. Efforts to minimize suffering and distress included the use of sedation (xylazine, detomidine, butorphanol) and use of analgesics (flunixin meglumine) when deemed appropriate. The definition of non-survivors in this study were foals who died or were euthanized due to grave medical prognosis in hospital. The determination of grave medical prognosis was made by the licensed attending clinician. Animal health and behavior were monitored every 1–6 hours based on level of criticality utilizing clinicians’ judgement. Animals were all housed inside the intensive care unit which consisted of individual, temperature-controlled stalls for each mare/foal pair. Research staff responsible for animal care and handling were all licensed veterinarians and veterinary nurses.
Classification
Foals were classified into 1 of 3 groups: septic, sick non-septic and healthy as based on previously published criteria [21, 22]. Foals were defined as septic if they fulfilled any of the following criteria: (1) positive blood culture, and/or (2) a sepsis score of ≥ 12 [20]. Sick non-septic foals were defined as those with a negative blood culture and a sepsis score between 6 and 11. Healthy foals were defined as those with a negative blood culture and a sepsis score ≤ 5.
Survival was defined as any foal born at or admitted to New Bolton Center who was discharged alive. Non-survival was defined as any foal born at or admitted to New Bolton Center who died or was euthanized due to grave medical prognosis. Foals euthanized due to financial constraints were excluded from data analysis.
Data collection
Historical data including maternal health during pregnancy, foaling date and details of foaling (Cesarean section, dystocia, induction protocol) were obtained. Age at presentation, breed and sex were recorded. Physical examination findings including rectal temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, the presence of swollen joints, diarrhea, petechiation, scleral injection, hypopyon, anterior uveitis, respiratory distress and the presence of seizures were recorded. The sepsis score (SS) and neonatal systemic inflammatory response syndrome score (NSIRS) were calculated for each foal [20]. Outcome was recorded as survival to hospital discharge or non-survival.
Clinicopathologic data collected included a compete blood count (CBC) (Element HT5, Heska, Loveland, CO), serum biochemistry (VITROS 350 Chemistry System, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Buckinghamshire, England), blood glucose concentration (Accu-Chek Performa glucometer, Roche, Indianapolis, IN), blood L-lactate concentration (Nova 8+ Electrolyte analyzer, Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA), plasma fibrinogen concentration (ACL Elite, Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA), serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration (DVM Rapid Test, MAI Animal Health, Elmwood, WI), blood culture (BD SEPTI-CHEK media bottles, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) (VersaTREK Automated Microbial Detection System, ThermoFischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and cfDNA concentration (Qubit 4 fluorometer, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA and Qubit™ dsDNA HS Assay Kit, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA).
Assay validation and pilot study
Pilot data was performed on thawed, previously frozen (-80°C) equine plasma samples from 10 healthy foals without DNA extraction. Phosphate buffered saline was used as a negative control. Each sample was run in triplicate and cfDNA was determined from the standard curve generated by low and high concentration lambda (E. coli bacteriophage) DNA standards. The intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) was 7.6%.
For foals of the reported study, samples from all foals as well as the 10 healthy foals from the pilot study were run in triplicate. The intraassay CV was 3%. Using the cfDNA values from the 10 healthy foals, the interassay CV was 5.4%.
Manufacturer specifications report the intraassay CV for low concentrations of DNA (>0.5ng/mL) was ≤2%. Further, the fluorescence stability shows <2.5% drop after 40 readings within a DNA concentration range of 1 to 500 ng/mL.
Sampling and processing
Approximately 25 mL of whole blood was obtained by jugular venipuncture using aseptic technique at the time of catheter placement or within 12 hours of admission or birth. Blood cultures were processed via inoculation (8mL of blood) and incubation of SEPTI-CHEK media bottles at 35°C for up to 7 days and detection using the VersaTREK Automated microbial system. When turbidity was apparent or 7 days had elapsed, the broth was Gram-stained and subcultured using trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep’s blood and MacConkey agar for aerobic isolation and using Brucella blood agar for anaerobic isolation.
Citrated plasma was collected for cfDNA quantification. Briefly, 2.7 mL of whole blood was collected into a citrate collection tube (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and centrifuged (Centritic Centrifuge, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 10 minutes at 1370 g within 30 minutes of collection. Plasma was then pipetted into polypropylene conical tubes. A small amount of plasma was left in the citrate tube so as not to disturb the buffy coat. Tubes were stored at -40°C, which has previously been shown to preserve sample integrity for cfDNA analysis [23]. At the time of batch processing, samples were thawed by allowing them to come to room temperature (20-22°C) and cfDNA quantification measures were performed in triplicate using a benchtop fluorometer (Qubit 4 fluorometer, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and associated reagents (Qubit 1x dsDNA HS Assay Kit, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) in thin-walled polypropylene tubes (Qubit Assay Tubes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Prior to initiating the study, sample size calculation was performed based on prior prevalence data on the reported proportions of critically ill foals who were bacteremic [24]. Given that cfDNA concentrations have been associated with bacteremia in critically ill humans [25, 26] and specific data regarding cfDNA in horses are lacking, we elected to use foal bacteremia data as a guide to determine sample size. With a power of 80% and significance set at P < 0.05, at least sixty (60) animals were deemed necessary for this prospective study. Data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk statistic. Parametric data are reported as mean (standard deviation) and non-parametric data are represented as median and range unless otherwise stipulated. Continuous variables between groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc test. Comparisons between two groups (blood culture positive and culture negative; survivor and non-survivor) were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated using Spearman rank test. The performance of cfDNA, sepsis score and NSIRS score to predict survival was assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis including area under the curve, sensitivity and specificity using cutoffs. Significance was set to P < 0.05. Analyses were performed using Prism Version 8.4.2 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and STATA (STATA Corp LLC, College Station, TX).
Results
Study population demographics
A total of 80 foals were enrolled in the study between January and July, 2020. There were 34 healthy foals (43%), 35 septic foals (44%), and 11 sick non-septic foals (13%). The median age of all foals in the study at the time of sampling was 0 days of age (range 0 to 10 days). The median age different foal groups were 0 days (range 0 to 2) for healthy foals, 0 days (range 0 to 10) for sick non-septic foals and 0 days (range 0 to 4) for septic foals and not significantly different (P>0.99). Of the 80 foals, 45 were colts (56%) and 35 were fillies (44%). Breeds represented within the study population included Thoroughbred (n = 48), Standardbred (n = 18), Warmblood (n = 7) and 1 each of the following: Appaloosa, Arabian, Clydesdale, Friesian, Miniature Horse, Morgan and Pony. There was no significant difference in sex or breed between the 3 groups. A total of 69/80 (86%) foals survived to discharge, and 11/80 (14%) of foals were euthanized or died. For sick hospitalized foals (sick non-septic and septic foals), 35/46 (76%) survived to discharge with 11/46 (24%) non-survivors. There was no significant difference in age between survivors and non-survivors in this population (P = 0.47). Cause of death or euthanasia due to associated poor prognosis included: neonatal encephalopathy (n = 4), congenital cardiac malformation (n = 2), Lethal White mutation (n = 1), atresia coli (n = 1), placental insufficency (n = 1), enterocolitis (n = 1) and septic peritonitis (n = 1).
Septic foals as defined using SS ≥ 12 and/or positive blood culture had a median sepsis score of 10 (range 0 to 29) at the time of presentation. The median NSIRS score for septic foals was 2 (range 0 to 5). In the septic group, the mortality rate was 26% (9/35), of which 2/9 (22%) died in hospital and 7/9 (78%) were euthanized. The most commonly diagnosed disease process/comorbidity at the time of admission in the septic foal group was neonatal encephalopathy (n = 12), followed by diarrhea (n = 5), failure of transfer of passive immunity (n = 4), dystocia (n = 3) and dysmaturity (n = 3). Additional diagnoses included colic (n = 1), dysphagia (n = 1), atresia coli (n = 1) and Lethal White Foal Syndrome (n = 1).
Healthy foals, as defined by a sepsis score ≤ 5 and negative blood culture had a median sepsis score of 2.5 (range 0 to 5) and median NSIRS score of 1 (0 to 2) at the time of presentation. The mortality rate was 0% (0/34). The most common reasons for presentation at the time of admission was birth as part of a standard foaling program package for low-risk mares (n = 11), mild neonatal encephalopathy (n = 8) and meconium impaction (n = 4). Three foals were presented as companions to their dams and two foals were presented for mild idiopathic dysphagia. Two foals were presented as part of a standard foaling program package for high-risk mares. Sick non-septic foals had a median sepsis score of 9 (range 6 to 11) and median NSIRS score of 1 (range 0 to 2) with a mortality rate of 22% (2/9). Both animals were euthanized due to grave prognosis. The most common reasons for presentation at the time of admission were dystocia (n = 3) and diarrhea/enterocolitis (n = 3).
Blood culture results
A total of 80 blood cultures were taken from 80 foals within 2 hours of admission or birth. Of foals that had culturable bacteria (24/80 (30%)), 39 isolates were obtained. Of those isolates, 23/39 (59%) were Gram-positive and 16/39 (41%) were Gram-negative. The most common isolates were of the genus Staphylococcus (n = 7), Bacillus (n = 3), Acinetobacter (n = 3), Escherichia (n = 3) Streptococcus (n = 2), Microbacterium (n = 2), Pseudomonas (n = 2), Stenotrophomonas (n = 2), Arthrobacter (n = 2), Pantoae (n = 2) and Enterococcus (n = 2). Additional isolates (n = 1) included Actinobacillus, Rhizobium, Curtobacterium, Corynebacterium, Klebsiella, Weissella, and Dietzia. The mean NSIRS score of the bacteremic population was 1.64 (standard deviation = 1.15), and the mean NSIRS score of the non-bacteremic population was 1.26 (standard deviation = 1.21). The mean sepsis score of the bacteremic population was 8.29 (standard deviation = 7.01), whereas the mean sepsis score of the non-bacteremic septic population was 6.28 (standard deviation = 5.09).
For foals who died, 5/11 (45%) had a positive blood culture. All positive cultures grew Gram-positive organisms with a further 2/5 also culturing Gram-negative organisms. Cultured isolates included bacteria of the following genus: Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Dietzia, Klebsiella and Enterococcus.
cfDNA concentrations and foal classification
There were no differences in cfDNA concentrations between groups of foals (Fig 1; P>0.05). Median cfDNA concentrations were 279.72 ng/mL (range 121.33 ng/mL to 424.67 ng/mL) in healthy foals, 301.33 ng/mL (range 193–393.67 ng/mL) in sick non-septic foals and 299.15 ng/mL (166.67 to 879.33 ng/mL) in septic foals.
Symbols represent values for individual foals with median and interquartile range error bars (P>0.05 between groups).
We further evaluated cfDNA concentrations based on SS alone to account for false positive blood cultures in healthy or non-septic foals and false negative blood cultures in septic foals. Table 1 shows cfDNA concentrations between groups of foals based on SS cut-off criteria alone (septic ≥ 12, SNS 6–11, healthy ≤ 5) excluding blood culture results. cfDNA concentrations were not different between foals when classifying based on SS alone (healthy versus septic P = 0.37; sick non-septic versus septic P = 0.43).
The relationship between sepsis score and cfDNA concentration is illustrated in Fig 2A and was not significantly correlated (ρ = 0.07, P = 0.48). Further, in foals with SS ≥ 12 there was no significant correlation between cfDNA concentration and SS value (ρ = 0.25; P = 0.36). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between NSIRS score and cfDNA concentration (Fig 2B; ρ = 0.11; P = 0.54). There were no significant difference in median cfDNA concentrations between bacteremic foals (298.67 ng/mL, range 121.3 to 434.7 ng/mL) and non-bacteremic foals (275.33, range 109 to 879.3 ng/mL; P = 0.07; Fig 3).
2A: cfDNA concentration and sepsis score (r = 0.07; P = 0.48). 2B: cfDNA concentration and NSIRS score (r = 0.07; P = 0.54). Symbols represent values for individual foals.
Symbols represent values for individual foals with median and interquartile range error bars (P = 0.07).
cfDNA concentrations and age
There was no correlation between cfDNA concentration and age in healthy foals (ρ = 0.16; P = 0.36) or overall for all foals (ρ = 0.13; P = 0.26). Further analysis evaluating the effect of age on cfDNA concentrations showed that for each day of age, there was a 1.72% increase in cfDNA concentration although not statistically significant (P = 0.13).
cfDNA concentrations and critical illness scoring systems in predicting outcome
cfDNA concentrations between survivors and non-survivors are shown in Fig 4. There was no significant difference in cfDNA concentrations between foals that survived (median 286.88 ng/mL (range 121.33 to 879.33 ng/mL) and non-survivors (314.5 ng/mL, range 176.00 to 476.33; P = 0.16). Univariate logistic regression showed no association between survival and cfDNA concentration (P = 0.41). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed poor utility for cfDNA to predict survival (AUC 0.64, P = 0.15; Fig 5A). ROC for sepsis score (Fig 5B) and neonatal SIRS score (Fig 5C) showed superior prediction to predict survival than cfDNA with an AUC for sepsis score of 0.85 (P<0.001) and for NSIRS score of 0.83 (P<0.001). Table 2 shows cut-off values for cfDNA, SS and NSIRS to yield the optimal diagnostic accuracy for survival.
Symbols represent values for individual foals with median and interquartile range error bars (P = 0.16).
Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for cfDNA (A), sepsis score (B) and NSIRS score (C) for predicting survival in 80 hospitalized neonatal foals.
Discussion
In the present study, cfDNA was detected in 100% of plasma samples obtained from this population of 80 foals admitted to a tertiary care facility. This finding supported our hypothesis that cfDNA would be detectable in plasma samples obtained from the equine neonate. Though circulating plasma cell-free DNA has been detected in multiple veterinary species including canines [10, 19, 27, 28] and felines [29], this is the first study confirming its presence in neonatal foals. Results of this study demonstrate a lack of significance in circulating cfDNA concentrations between foal cohorts with varying illness severity. Further, cfDNA concentrations were not correlated with SS or NSIRS and we did not demonstrate an association between cfDNA and blood culture status or survival.
Recent studies in humans [11, 17, 18, 30] and dogs [10, 19] have illustrated the value of cfDNA as a potential biomarker for the detection of sepsis through its ability to discriminate septic and healthy patients. Of note, all of these studies have been performed on adult populations, differing from the age group of the findings reported here. In 2008, Tuaeva et al. investigated levels of cfDNA in the blood plasma of premature human neonates [31]. The ranges of cfDNA concentrations obtained were between 9.9 and 136.5 ng/mL [31] across all groups, significantly lower than ranges in other studies performed in adults. The relatively low concentrations of cfDNA in all foals of this study, regardless of illness severity, could be a function of species, disease state, immune state [32] and/or age. We observed a trend for increasing cfDNA concentrations with age and further prospective studies in equine neonates into adulthood would help elucidate the effect of age on circulating cfDNA concentrations in horses.
Although the source of circulating cell-free DNA is debatable, it is believed that circulating levels are related to cellular breakdown and active DNA-release mechanisms in host cells [33]. The concept of neutrophil extracellular traps, or NETs, involves the release of web-like scaffolds of cell-free DNA composed of extracellular chromatin which can enhance antimicrobial activity in the face of an infectious stimulus [34]. A model utilizing canine neutrophils has revealed that high-dose lipopolysaccharide stimulates the cells to undergo the production of NETs in vitro [35]. Investigating such mechanisms in the neonate, it is possible that our samples were obtained from an immune-competent but immune-naïve population based on age (10 days or less) where the degree of neutrophil activation, function or apoptosis is decreased compared to adult horses thereby limiting the amount of cell-free DNA released into circulation [36]. Including positive controls in the form of adult horses with well-documented conditions associated with tissue necrosis such as colitis [37] or pleuronpneumonia [38] may have bolstered our hypothesis regarding the influence of age on the lack of utlility of cfDNA in the critically-ill equine neonate.
The accuracy of fluorometry for the measurement of even small amounts of cfDNA has been previously demonstrated and validated [39]. While DNA extraction may improve DNA purity from samples, extraction processes have been shown to decrease total DNA concentration by removing small fragments [40–42] as reported in canine studies [43, 44]. Typical DNA extraction protocols are not sensitive when conserving small fragments <100 base pairs in size), yielding up to eight-fold variations in cfDNA concentrations [42]. Based on these data, cfDNA quantification of unaltered plasma appears acceptable [44] as we have done in this study. However, further investigation on the impact of DNA extraction on fluorometric cfDNA concentrations in equine plasma are needed.
The relatively small number of foals that died or were euthanized in this study compared to previous reports may also have affected our ability demonstrate the utility of cfDNA to predict outcome [3, 45]. In one published retrospective study analyzing equine neonatal admissions at a university teaching hospital between 1982 and 2008, 27.2% of foals did not survive to discharge [3]. A more recent retrospective of neonates admitted to a university or private referral hospital between 2008–2009 had a mortality rate of 21%. In this study, only 11/80 (14%) did not survive to discharge, limiting our ability to extrapolate the relationship between cell-free DNA levels and survival. Excluding healthy foals, 76% of sick non-septic and septic foals survived while 24% were euthanized or died. It is possible that the difference between studies may lie in differences in patient populations and diseases, and the large number of healthy foals enrolled in the study may have contributed to these data. Post-hoc analysis was performed to determine a sample size number where a clinically relevant difference (20%) in cfDNA between healthy and septic foals which found that 31 healthy and 31 septic foals would be needed. Further study with a larger population of critically ill foals may further define if cfDNA is associated with neonatal survival.
The definition of sepsis is a significant factor to consider in this study as well as past and future studies. This is particularly important in how foals are stratified and by what discriminating factors. Using the sepsis score and blood culture status to distinguish foals into categories (healthy, sick non-septic and sepsis) has inherent limitations and low reported sensitivities in neonatal foals [3, 7, 8, 20, 46]. False positive blood cultures have been documented in human literature and have been associated with increased hospital stays, inappropriate administration of antimicrobials and unnecessary hospital expense [47–49]. Blood cultures yielding non-pathogenic isolates can influence sepsis scoring systems and categorization schemes [48, 50, 51]. False negative blood cultures can also occur in septic foals for reasons such as the fastidious nature of some organisms that do not grow well in culture media or low circulating numbers of bacteria in the bloodstream at the time of sampling [3]. Prior administration of antimicrobials at the time of sample collection could also result in a negative culture result [36, 52], however guidelines in human medicine report that a delay in treatment is associated with increased morbidity and mortality [1, 53, 54]. The classification scheme used in this study has a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 61% with an area under the curve of 0.71 [19]. The additional classification criteria of a positive blood culture possesses a documented sensitivity of only 61.9% in septic human neonates [6]. Given these findings, further study is needed to more accurately classify foals, particularly septic foals versus bacteremic foals.
In conclusion, plasma cell-free DNA concentration levels appear to be inadequate as a diagnostic biomarker for foals with sepsis or to predict survival in a neonatal population. Similar to studies in adult humans and dogs, the utility of cfDNA warrants further study in adult horses, notably horses with critical illness where cfDNA may have prognostic value in an immunologically mature subject but is yet to be determined. Finally, the pursuit of a robust and accurate method to diagnose sepsis is still needed as illness severity scoring systems (e.g. sepsis score) and one-time blood culture methods appear woefully insensitive in this population.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the interns, residents and nurses at New Bolton Center for sample collection and their dedication to the management of the foals in this study.
References
- 1. Fielding CL, Magdesian KG. Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Equine Neonate. Vet Clin North Am. 2015;31:483–496. pmid:26612744
- 2. Paradis MR. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. Equine Practice. 1994;10:109–135. pmid:8039028
- 3. Giguere S, Weber EJ, Sanchez LC. Factors associated with outcome and gradual improvement in survival over time in 1065 equine neonates admitted to an intensive care unit. Equine Vet J. 2017;49:45–50. pmid:26538009
- 4. Hurcombe SD, Toribio RE, Slovis N. Blood arginine vasopressin, adrenocorticotropin hormone and cortisol concentrations at admission in septic and critically ill foals and their association with survival. J Vet Intern Med. 2008;22:639–647. pmid:18466247
- 5. Hurcombe SD, Toribio RE. Slovis NM. Calcium regulating hormones and serum calcium and magnesium concentrations in septic and critically ill foals and their association with survival. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23:335–343. pmid:19210311
- 6. Weinbren MJ, Collins M, Heathcote R, Umar M, Nisar M, Ainger C, et al. Optimization of the Blood Culture Pathway: A Template for Improved Sepsis Management and Diagnostic Antimicrobial Stewardship. J Hosp Infect. 2018;98:232–235. pmid:29309813
- 7. Pusterla N, Mapes S, Burne BA,Magdesian KG. Detection of blood stream infection in neonatal foals with suspected sepsis using real-time PCR. Vet Rec. 2009;165:114–117. pmid:19633325
- 8. Hackett ES, Lunn DP, Ferris RA, Horohov DW, Lappin MR, McCue PM. Detection of bacteremia and host response in healthy neonatal foals. Equine Vet J. 2015;47:405–409. pmid:24917427
- 9. Corley KT, Furr MO. Evaluations of a score designed to predict sepsis in foals. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2003;13:149–155.
- 10. Letendre JA, Goggs R. Determining prognosis in canine sepsis by bedside measurement of cell- free DNA and nucleosomes. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2018;28:503–511. pmid:30299568
- 11. Avriel A, Wiessman MP, Almog Y, Perl Y, Novack V, Galante Oet al. Admission Cell Free DNA Levels Predict 28-day Mortality in Patients with Severe Sepsis in Intensive Care. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100514 1–7. pmid:24955978
- 12. Rhodes A, Wort SJ, Thomas H, Wort SJ, Thomas H, Collinson Pet al. Plasma DNA concentration as a predictor of mortality and sepsis in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2006;10:R60. pmid:16613611
- 13. Yipp BG, Kubes P. NETosis: how vital is it? Blood. 2013;122:2784–2794. pmid:24009232
- 14. Streleckiene G, Forster M, Inciuraite R, Lukosevicius R, Skieceviciene J. Effects of Quantification Methods, Isolation Kits, Plasma Biobanking, and Hemolysis on Cell-Free DNA Analysis in Plasma. Biopreserv Biobank. 2019;17: pmid:31343271
- 15. Dragan AI, Casas-Finet JR, Bishop ES, Strouse RJ, Schenerman MA, Geddes CD. Characterization of PicoGreen Interaction with dsDNA and the Origin of Its Fluorescence Enhancement Upon Binding. Biophys J. 2010;99:3010–3019. pmid:21044599
- 16. Li X, Yuhua Wu, Zhang Li, Cao Y, Li Y, Li J et al. Comparison of three common DNA concentration measurement methods. Anal Biochem. 2014;451:18–24. pmid:24495734
- 17. Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Cell-free DNA and outcomes in sepsis. Crit Care 2012;16:170. pmid:23140420
- 18. Saukkonen K, Lakkisto P, Pettila V, Varpula M, Karlsson S, Ruokonen Eet al. Cell-free plasma DNA as a predictor of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Clin Chem. 2008;45:1000–1007. pmid:18420731
- 19. Letendre KA, Goggs R. Measurement of plasma cell-free DNA concentrations in dogs with sepsis, trauma and neoplasia. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2017;3:307–314. pmid:28295988
- 20. Wong DM, Ruby RE, Dembek KA, Barr BS, Ruess SM, Magdesian KGet al. Evaluation of updated sepsis scoring systems and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and their association with sepsis in equine neonates. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32:1185–1193. pmid:29582480
- 21. Dembek KA, Onasch K, Hurcombe SDA, MacGillivray KC, Slovis NM, Barr BSet al. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in hospitalized neonatal foals. J Vet Intern Med. 2013;27:331–338. pmid:23398197
- 22. Barnsick RJIM, Hurcombe SDA, Dembek KA, Frazer ML, Slovis NM, Saville WJA , et al. Somatotropic axis resistance and ghrelin in critically ill foals. Equine Vet J. 2014;46:45–49. pmid:23663031
- 23. Sato A, Nakashhima C, Abe T, Kato J, Hirai M, Nakamura Tet al. Investigation of appropriate pre-analytical procedure for circulating free DNA from liquid biopsy. Oncotarget. 2018;9:31904–31914. pmid:30159131
- 24. Hollis A, Wilkins P, Palmer J, Boston RC. Bacteremia in equine neonatal diarrhea: a retrospective study (1990–2007). J Vet Intern Med. 2008;22:1203–1209. pmid:18638014
- 25. Forsblom E, Aittoniemi J, Ruostalainen E, et al. High cell-free DNA predicts fatal outcome among Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia patients with intensive care unit treatment. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87741. pmid:24520336
- 26. Huttunen R, Kuparinen T, Jylhava J, et al. Fatal outcome in bacteremia is characterized by high plasma cell free DNA concentration and apoptotic DNA fragmentation: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2011;6(7):e21700. pmid:21747948
- 27. Tagawa M, Shimbo G, Inokuma H, Miyahara K. Quantification of plasma cell-free DNA levels in dogs with various tumors. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019;31(6):836–843. pmid:31585514
- 28. Jeffery U, Kimura K, Gray R, Lueth P, Bellaire B, LeVine D. Dogs cast NETs too: Canine neutrophil extracellular traps in health and immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2015;168:262–268. pmid:26574161
- 29. Rushton JG, Ertl R, Klein D, Tichy A, Nell B. Circulating cell-free DNA does not harbour a diagnostic benefit in cats with feline diffuse iris melanomas. J Feline Med Surg. 2019;21(2):124–132. pmid:29529957
- 30. Huang T, Yang Z, Chen S, Chen J. Predictive value of plasma cell-free DNA for prognosis of sepsis. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018;30(10):925–928. pmid:30439309
- 31. Tuaeva NO, Abramova ZI, Softonov VV. The Origin of Elevated Levels of Circulating DNA in Blood Plasma of Premature Neonates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1137:27–30. pmid:18837920
- 32. Perkins GA, Wagner B. The development of equine immunity: Current knowledge on immunity in the young horse. Eq Vet J. 2014;47:267–274.
- 33. Aucamp J, Bronkhorst AJ, Badenhorst CPS, Pretorius PJ. The diverse origins of circulating cell-free DNA in the human body: a critical re-evaluation of the literature. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018;93:1649–1683. pmid:29654714
- 34. Goggs R, Jeffery U, LeVine DN, Li RHL. Neutrophil-Extracellular Traps, Cell-Free DNA, and Immunothrombosis in Companion Animals: A Review. Vet Pathol. 2020;57(1):6–23. pmid:31342866
- 35. Li HL, Ng G, Tablin F. Lipopolysaccharide-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation in canine neutrophils is dependent on histone H3 citrullination by peptidylarginine deiminase. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2017;193–194:29–37. pmid:29129225
- 36. McTaggart A, Yovich JV, Penhale J, Raidal SL. A comparison of foal and adult horse neutrophil function using flow cytometric techniques. Res Vet Sci. 2001;71(1):73–79. pmid:11666151
- 37. Feary DJ, Hassel DM. Enteritis and Colitis in Horses. Vet Clin Equine 2006;22:437–479. pmid:16882483
- 38. Carr EA, Carlson GP, Wilson WD, Read DH. Acute hemorrhagic pulmonary infarction and necrotizing pneumonia in horses: 21 cases (1967–1993). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;12:1774–1778. pmid:9187729
- 39. Khetan D, Gupta N, Chaudhary Ret al. Comparison of UV spectrometry and fluorometry-based methods for quantification of cell-free DNA in red cell components. Asian J Transfus Sci 2019;13:95–99. pmid:31896914
- 40. Goldstein H, Hausmann MJ, Douvdenani A. A rapid direct fluorescent assay for cell-free DNA quantification in biological fluids. Clin Biochem. 2009;46:488–494
- 41. Xue X, Teare MD, Holen I, Zhu YM, Woll PJ. Optimizing the yield and utility of circulating cell-free DNA from plasma and serum. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:100–104 pmid:19281804
- 42. Jung K, Fleischhacker M, Rabien A. Cell-free DNA in the blood as a solid tumor biomarker–a critical appraisal of the literature. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:1611–1624 pmid:20688053
- 43. Schaefer DMW, Forman MA, Kisseberth WC, Lehman AM, Kelbick NT, Harper P, Rush LJ. Quantification of plasma DNA as a prognostic indicator in canine lymphoid neoplasma. Vet Comp Oncol. 2007;5:145–155 pmid:19754786
- 44. Burnett DL, Cave NJ, Gedye KR, Bridges JP. Investigation of cell-free DNA in canine plasma and its relation to disease. Vetinary Quarterly 2016;36:122–129 pmid:27103480
- 45. Borchers A, Wilkins PA, Marsh PM, Axon JE, Read J, Castagnetti C. er al. Association on admission L-lactate concentration in hospitalized equine neonates and with presenting complaint, periparturient events, clinical diagnosis and outcome: a prospective multicenter study. Equine Vet J. 2012;44(41):57–63.
- 46. Furr M, McKenzie H. Factors associated with the risk of positive blood culture in neonatal foals presented to a referral center (2000–2014). J Vet Intern Med. 2020;1–13. pmid:33044020
- 47. Norberg A, Christopher NC, Ramundo ML, Bower JR Berman SA. Contamination rates of blood cultures obtained by dedicated phlebotomy vs intravenous catheter. JAMA. 2003;289:726–729. pmid:12585951
- 48. Weinbaum FL, Lavie S, Danek M, Sixsmith D, Heinrich GF, Mills SS. Doing it right the first time: quality improvement and the contaminant blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:563–565. pmid:9041389
- 49. Hall KK, Lyman JA. 2006. Updated Review of Blood Culture Contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:788–802. pmid:17041144
- 50. Bates DW, Goldman L, Lee TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization: the true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA. 1991;265:365–369. pmid:1984535
- 51. Dunagan WC, Woodward RS, Medoff G, Gray III JL, Casabr E, Smith MDet al. Antimicrobial misuse in patients with positive blood cultures. Am J Med. 1989;87:253–259. pmid:2773963
- 52. Scheer CS, Fuchs C, Grundling M, Vollmer M, Bast J, Bohnert JAet al. Impact of antibiotic administration on blood culture positivity at the beginning of sepsis: a prospective clinical cohort study. Clin Micribiol Infect. 2019;25:326–331. pmid:29879482
- 53. Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Balamuth F, Alpern ER, Lavelle J, Chilutti Met al. Delayed antimicrobial therapy increases mortality and organ dysfunction in pediatric sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2409–2417. pmid:25148597
- 54. Wisdom A, Eaton V, Gordon D, Daniel S, Woodman R, Phillips C. INITAIT-E.D.: impact of timing of INITIation of Antibiotic Therapy on mortality of patients presenting to an Emergency Department with sepsis. Emerg Med Australas. 2015;27:196–201. pmid:25847048