https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3196-3064
Figures
Abstract
Within the Anopheles gambiae complex, the sibling species An. coluzzii and An. gambiae are undergoing sympatric speciation. These species are characterized by rare hybrids in most of their geographical distribution. A strong assortative mating mediated by spatial swarm segregation has been shown whereas no intrinsic post-zygotic barriers have been found in laboratory conditions. To test the role of the hybridisation in reproductive isolation in natural populations transplant experiment are therefore needed to establish the significance of post-zygotic barriers. Previous studies indicated that predation is one of the major forces driving ecological divergence between An. gambiae and An. coluzzii. Here we extended these studies to their hybrids. Parental species and their F1 hybrids from reciprocal crosses were generated by the forced-mating technique as follows: female An. coluzzii × male An. coluzzii; female An. coluzzii × male An. gambiae; female An. gambiae × male An. coluzzii and female An. gambiae × Male An. gambiae. First instar larvae of each group from the crossing (here after An. coluzzii, Hybrid COL/GAM, Hybrid GAM/COL and An. gambiae, respectively) were transplanted in a field experiment with predation effect. Emergence success, development time of larvae and body size of the newly emerging adults were estimated as fitness components and then compared between parental species and F1 hybrids in absence and in presence of predators. Our findings confirm that An. coluzzii had higher fitness than An. gambiae in presence of predators versus in absence of predators. Moreover, the fitness of the F1 hybrid COL/GAM whose female parent was An. coluzzii matched that of An. coluzzii while that of the F1 reciprocal hybrid GAM/COL was similar to An. gambiae.
Citation: Niang A, Sawadogo SP, Dabiré RK, Tripet F, Diabaté A (2020) Assessment of the ecologically dependent post-zygotic isolation between Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240625
Editor: Igor V. Sharakhov, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, UNITED STATES
Received: July 22, 2020; Accepted: September 29, 2020; Published: October 29, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Niang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was funded by a joint UK Medical Research Council: https://mrc.ukri.org/ and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) Africa Research Leader grant to Abdoulaye Diabaté and Frederic Tripet (Grant Reference No: G1001336/1, Grant ID: 97014).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that they have no competing interests.
Introduction
Speciation involves the evolution of barriers to gene flow between diverging populations. Understanding speciation thus implies two major tasks: determining which reproductive barriers are involved in the reduction in gene flow between populations and, understanding which evolutionary forces produce them. Selection is known to be one of the most important biological processes in the formation of new species, that acts on individuals to let only the mostly fit offspring survive and reproduce to their full potential. Selection against hybrids, as an ecologically-dependent post-zygotic reproductive isolation occurs between species when hybrids are less efficient at exploiting parental environments and an intermediate environment is lacking [1, 2]. So, hybrids which suffer reduced fitness would not be well adapted to either parental environment, they would fall between niches. During the early phase of sympatric divergence, species may have been incompletely reproductively isolated populations, suggesting that ecotypes are excellent models for studying ecological speciation.
Within the An. gambiae complex, three sibling species An. coluzzii and An. gambiae [3] and An. arabiensis have the widest range of distribution and are responsible for the vast majority of malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa [4]. An. coluzzii and An. gambiae represent the most recent speciation event in the complex [5, 6] and are thought to be undergoing a process of speciation with gene flow [7–9]. Understanding the mechanisms of their pre-mating and post-zygotic reproductive isolation has important implications for vector control [10]. Assortative mating mediated by spatial swarm segregation between An. coluzzii and An. gambiae has been widely described as a pre-mating isolation barrier [11–16]. However, the current gene flow [17–19] and the extensive hybridization [8, 20–22] observed between An. coluzzii and An. gambiae could be the result of an imperfect assortative mating [23] notably due to the periodically break down in sympatric seasonal populations [13, 16].
While no intrinsic post-zygotic barrier has been found in laboratory conditions [24], previous studies have supported that An. coluzzii and An. gambiae larvae differ in their ability to exploit larval habitats in nature [25, 26]. An. coluzzii is better adapted to more permanent larval habitats mainly resulting from human activities, including rice fields, whereas An. gambiae grows up in temporary body waters mostly rain-dependent [21, 26–29] such as the edges of puddles. Many factors including desiccation, nutrients, competition, and predation are believed to affect strongly habitat selection of mosquito larvae. Several studies have demonstrated the role of predators in controlling mosquito population sizes in nature [30]. For example, an overall estimate of 94% mortality of mosquito larvae are due to predation [31]. The contrasted larval habitats of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae are associated with differences in the composition and abundance of aquatic mosquito predators [26]. Previously, predator pressure has been shown to be typically higher in areas of rice cultivation than in temporary puddles [32, 33], leading to the mosquito ecological segregation [26, 28, 34, 35]. Using transplantation of first instar larvae in a field experiment, [26] we estimated the development success of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae in both temporary puddles and permanent rice fields larval sites with a predation effect. The results have demonstrated that the two species are adapted to different types of larval habitats, leading to evolutionary implications for speciation. Unfortunately, until now, the information about how the parental environments of the two species directly affect the fitness of the hybrids in wild is lacking.
In the present study we tested a prediction of the ecological outcome concerning the fitness of hybrids between An. coluzzii and An. gambiae as one of the most important components of the extrinsic post-zygotic isolating mechanisms. Selection against hybrids will reinforce larval habitat preference of the parental species. In this scheme hybrids between An. coluzzii and An. gambiae would also have a lower mean fitness than either parental species. Accordingly, the high rate of hybridization between the two species observed along the Western coast of Africa [20, 22, 36] was typically unexpected due to the fact that a low fitness of the hybrids might be associated to their reduced survival and/or reproductive success. Thus, it suggests either a different mating behaviour or a loss selection pressure on hybrids in this part of Africa. Recently, studies have also demonstrated that asymmetric introgressions [17] and hybridization can be promoted by asymmetric over-dominance of An. coluzzii in sympatric seasonal populations of the two species [16]. So far most of the genomic data accumulated suggest that hybrids are selected against in most of the distribution of the two species [7, 8]. More recently we describe selection against F1 hybrids of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae between the mating stage and the more advance (larval and adult) stages [16], but no empirical study has specifically looked at it. Hybrid transplant experiments are needed to complement laboratory-based data explaining the rarity of An. coluzzii × An. gambiae hybrids [24]. This approach allows us to test the significance of ecologically-dependent post-zygotic barriers between these species. By means of transplant experiment, we estimated the development success in terms of mortality rates and time of larval stage of the parental species An. coluzzii and An. gambiae compared to their F1hybrids from reciprocal crosses. The either F1 hybrid types are so-called here COL/GAM or GAM/COL according to they are being from the cross mating of An. coluzzii females with An. gambiae males or from An. gambiae females with An. coluzzii males, respectively. The wing size, as a correlated index of body size which thought to be a primary component of fitness, was also measured and compared between the parental species and the F1 hybrids. Our results are of significant importance and lead to better understanding of the ongoing ecological speciation in these major malaria vectors within the An. gambiae complex.
Results
A total of 5,400 first instar larvae were transplanted in 36 cages in the rice field of Bama in presence or absence of predators. The larvae were composed of An. gambiae, An. coluzzii and the two reciprocal F1 hybrids (i.e the hybrid COL/GAM and the hybrid GAM/COL).
Developmental success
Overall 1,987 emergent adults were collected representing 36.8% of the total number of the initial transplanted larvae, with 63.2% of mortality regardless either in the presence or the absence of predators. The mortality rates of females recorded in presence of predator (78.1%) was significantly higher than in absence of predator (42%). The results were similar in males with a mortality rates of 82% in presence of predator and 50.7% in absence of predator (Fig 1A). The overall effects of the predator, replicates, cage, sex and their interactions on the mortality rate at emergence across all transplant cages were examined using the Logistic Regression Model (Table 1). Significant effects of the presence of predator, replicates, cage and sex were observed on the overall mortality rates of transplanted larvae (P < 0.001). As evidenced by their Chi-square contributions (Table 1), the presence of predator explained the highest proportion of variance, followed by those of cage and sex. Mortality was higher in cages with predators present and in males compared to females (Fig 1A).
Comparison of the mortality rate (a) between males and females and, (b) between parents and hybrids in presence or absence of predators.
As the hybrid males could not be identified by the PCR technique used in this study, the subsequent analysis was done on females only. Species identification was successfully performed on 1070 female specimens with only nine individuals failing to amplify. The mortality rate over both parental species (An. gambiae and An. coluzzii) was 80.3% in presence of predator and 41.9% without. Similarly, the overall mortality rate of hybrids from both reciprocal types of crosses was recorded at 76.6% and 43.1% in presence and absence of predator, respectively (Fig 1B).
Next the mortality of the genotypes An. coluzzii, Hybrid COL/GAM and An. gambiae in the presence and absence of predator as well, within the first transplant experimental combination were analysed using Logistic Regression Model (Table 2, Fig 2). Predator presence strongly affected the survival of all genotypes to the adult stage (P < 0.001). There was no direct significant effect of genotype on mortality rates (P = 0.960), but a strong and significant interaction between genotypes and predation on mortality rates (P < 0.001) (Table 2). The mortality rate was significantly higher for An. gambiae (87.6%) compared to An. coluzzii (78.2%) and the Hybrid COL/GAM (78.7%) in presence of predator, while it was significantly less in absence of predators (Table 3, Fig 2) with 29.9% vs 45.3% for An. coluzzii and 46.7% for the Hybrid COL/GAM. In other words, An. gambiae performed better than either An. coluzzii or the hybrid COL/GAM in absence of predators, but both outcompeted the former one in presence of predator (Fig 2). No significant difference in the mortality rate of An. coluzzii and that of the hybrid COL/GAM was found (Table 3), they performed equally well in absence or presence of predators, suggesting that hybrid whose mothers are of An. coluzzii survived better the predator attacks. Differences in mortality rates of the genotypes An. coluzzii, Hybrid GAM/COL and An. gambiae in the presence and absence of predators (Table 3), as well as their performances were also analysed based on the similar model used above. Consistent with the data analyses in Fig 2, the Logistic Regression Model (Table 2) showed that predation has a significant effect on the mortality rates of the different genotypes (Log-likelihood Chi-square: n = 536, df = 2, χ2 = 33.03, P < 0.001). An. coluzzii exhibited a higher mortality rate (59.1%) than An. gambiae (33.9%) and the hybrid GAM/COL (39.5%) in absence of predators, but in presence of predators they were both poor competitors with 83.6% and 74.6% mortality for An. gambiae and the Hybrid GAM/COL respectively, vs 72% for An. coluzzii (Fig 2). No significant difference was found between An. gambiae and the hybrid GAM/COL (Table 3).
Development time
The overall development time varied from five to thirteen days. The variation in development time was significantly affected by the effects of replicate (P < 0.001), predator (P < 0.001) and sex (P = 0.047) (Table 4, Fig 3A and 3B). In females the mean numbers of day till emergence were 8.02 (95% CI = 7.48–8.61) and 7.20 (95% CI = 6.44–8.09) in absence and in presence of predators, respectively. In males the mean number of days till emergence was 7.97 (95% CI = 7.39–8.61) in absence of predator vs 7.06 (95% CI = 6.24–8.02) in presence of predators (Fig 3A and 3B).
Comparison of the frequency of the emergent females (a) and males (b) through the development time of larvae reared in presence or absence of predators.
The subsequent analyses were performed for each experimental combination using the female genotype data. In the experimental combination composed of An. coluzzii, hybrid COL/GAM and An. gambiae genotypes, development time was strongly influenced by the predator presence (Proportional Hazard: n = 534, df = 1, χ2 = 97.7, P < 0.001) (Fig 4A and 4B). There was a significant effect of genotype on development time (Proportional Hazard: n = 534, df = 2, χ2 = 36.7, P = 0.001) (Table 5, Fig 4A and 4B); but no interaction between genotype (Hybrid and Parent) and predator presence (Proportional Hazard: P >0.05).
Comparison of the frequency of the emergent hybrids (a) and parents (b) through the development time of larvae reared in presence or absence of predators.
In the first experimental combination the mean number of days till emergence was significantly higher in absence of predators with 8.46 (95% CI = 7.13–10.15) for An. coluzzii, 8.35 s (95% CI = 7.02–10.05) for the hybrid COL/GAM and 8.01 (95% CI = 6.91–9.36) for An. gambiae. When predators were present, these changed to 7.24 (95% CI = 5.54–9.72), 7.23 (95% CI = 5.52–9.73) and 6.86 (95% CI = 4.83–10.18) days for An. coluzzii, the hybrid COL/GAM and An. gambiae, respectively (Table 5, Fig 5A–5C).
Comparison of the frequency of An. coluzzii (a) the Hybrid COL/GAM (b) and An. gambiae (c); An. coluzzii (d), the Hybrid GAM/COL (e) and An. gambiae (f) through the development time of larvae reared in presence or absence of predators.
In the second experimental combination, there was again a very significant effect of predator presence on the mean number of days of emergence (Proportional Hazard: n = 534, df = 8, χ2 = 100.8, P < 0.001). Developmental times were significantly shorter in absence of predators with 7.97 (95% CI = 6.54–9.84) for An. coluzzii, 8.01 (95% CI = 6.81–9.53) for the Hybrid GAM/COL and 7.87 (95% CI = 6.73–9.27) for An. gambiae than in presence of predator with 7.17 (95% CI = 5.66–9.28), 6.89 (95% CI = 5.39–9.02) and 7.13 (95% CI = 5.25–10.03) for An. coluzzii, the hybrid GAM/COL and An. gambiae respectively (P < 0.008) (Fig 5D–5F) (Table 5). However, there was not significant effect of genotypes on development time (n = 534, df = 16, χ2 = 24.8, P = 0.074) and no significant interaction (Proportional Hazard: P > 0.05).
Adult body size
Adult female wing size averaged 3.00 mm and ranged from 2.46 mm to 3.57 mm. Across both experimental combinations combined, females were significantly larger in the hybrid COL/GAM experimental combinations than in the hybrid GAM/COL combinations (General linear model: n = 135, df = 7, χ2 = 19.41, P < 0.001). Females were also significantly larger when predators were present (GLM: n = 135, df = 1, χ2 = 6.47, P = 0.012). There was no overall difference in the wing size of individuals from the parental species and hybrids (GLM: n = 135, df = 1, χ2 = 0.008, P = 0.928) (Fig 6). The interaction between type of individuals (parent or hybrid) and predator (present or absent) was not significant (GLM: n = 135, df = 1, χ2 = 0.20, P = 0.653).
Conducting separate analyses for the hybrids COL/GAM and GAM/COL experimental combinations showed that in the first experimental combination neither the presence of predator nor female genotype affected wing size (GLM: predator, n = 84, χ2 = 0.05, P = 0.826; female genotype, df = 2, χ2 = 2.32, P = 0.105) (Fig 7). In the second experimental combination, a strong significant effect of predator was found on the wing size (GLM: n = 51, df = 1, χ2 = 27.03, P < 0.001) (Fig 7). Genotype did not have a significant impact on wing size (GLM: df = 2, χ2 = 1.11, P = 0.339).
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated ecologically dependent post-zygotic barriers thought to have played an important role in the ecological speciation of the recently diverged species An. coluzzii and An. gambiae. First instar larvae of the two parental species An. coluzzii and An. gambiae and their F1 hybrids from bidirectional reciprocal crosses of the two species were transplanted in a rice field area and randomly assigned to experimental enclosures with or without predators. For the first time, life history components such as survivorship, development time and body size were compared between the parental species and their reciprocal F1 hybrids in relation to predation.
In this study, predator presence was associated with significant mortality and a major determinant of emergence success. The mortality rate was also significantly higher for An. gambiae than it was for An. coluzzii in presence of predator, but the reverse was true in absence of predators, thereby confirming that diverging responses to predators and the resulting genotype-environment interaction (G×E) may play an important role in niche partitioning and speciation. Most interestingly, the mortality rate of the hybrid COL/GAM (whose mothers were An. coluzzii) did not differ from that of An. coluzzii, while the hybrids GAM/COL (whose mothers were An. gambiae) performed like An. gambiae. In the first experimental combination event though An. coluzzii and the Hybrid COL/GAM are better competitor than An. gambiae, they would be disadvantage by the number of individuals which was initially two folders higher than those of An. gambiae. However, in the second experimental combination in addition that An. coluzzii had a better strategy in presence of predator, the number of individuals of An. coluzzii was to folders smaller than those of An. gambiae and the Hybrid GAM/COL combined. This could provide double advantages to An. coluzzii which developed better in the second experimental combination compared to the first experimental combination and the observed difference of the mortality rates. Predation is responsible for a high proportion of larval mortality in natural populations sometimes reaching over 90% [30, 37]. Estimations of the aquatic mortality due to the predation varied also from 2% to 96% in a semi-field experiment in Kenya [38]. In a previous larval transplantation experiment of An. gambiae and An. coluzzii, the latter survived better than An. gambiae in presence of predators [26], which further studies attributed to better behavioural predation avoidance [29, 34, 35].
The results of this study do not support the hypothesis that a lower fitness of F1 hybrids larval stages might contribute to extrinsic post-zygotic reproductive barriers between the sister species. Instead, F1 hybrids from both reciprocal crosses had similar reaction norms in response to predator species to that of their female parent species. This suggest that predatory avoidance behaviour was inherited from mothers possibly through loci in the genome acting in a maternal dominance pattern. Maternal effects have been widely recognized as important factors which influence offspring phenotype in insects [39–41] and they have been linked to reproductive pre and post-zygotic isolation processes in the Diptera, Lepidoptera and Orthoptera [42, 43]. In hybridization studies of three closely-related species of Chorthippus grasshoppers, results revealed contrasted modes of inheritance for female courtship song preferences [42, 44, 45]. Strong maternal effects were found in Chorthippus biguttulus/mollis hybrid females [46, 47] even though, in this context further additional backcrossing studies should aim to better understand the genetic and epigenetic processes involved.
Results of this study have shown a higher overall larval mortality in males resulting in an adult sex-ratio biased towards females. The number of transplanted larvae in this scheme was supposed to be comprised of both sexes, assuming a 1:1 sex ratio at hatching, though this is a method frequently used to quantify males and females first instar larvae in mosquitoes [26, 48]. Previous studies revealed that male and female larval survival in mosquitoes can be differentially affected by many factors that are dependent on the species and environmental conditions. Survival may be equal for both sexes [49] or stronger for female [50] or for male [51].
Our data on the developmental time shows that overall larvae of both sexes developed faster in presence of predators. Parental species and the two reciprocal hybrids had similar development time in absence of predator with no significant effect of the genotype noted in either experimental combination. Specifically, both parental species and hybrids developed faster in presence of predator. Increased developmental rate is likely due to the higher mortality observed in presence of predators which resulted in lower densities hence decreased resource competition. From an evolutionary point of view, and provided that larvae have access to sufficient food, it is possible that larvae accelerate their development in presence of aquatic predators as an adaptation to avoid predation [52]. Our data on body size does not support the hypothesis that this acceleration was traded against phenotypic quality (see below). In two studies, exposing An. coluzzii larvae to the presence of backswimmers or fishes induced stress which reduces larval survivorship but also increased development time [53, 54]. An obvious difference between the results presented here and those reported from laboratory studies is that in the latter, larvae might have had less opportunity to increase food intake whilst the larvae in our field cages had access to natural food sources.
Compatible with the idea that predation reduced larval density and food competition, overall, larvae reared with predators also achieved larger body sizes than those without predators. Reduced larval density resulting from predation [30, 37] leads to a shorter development time of mosquito larvae as shown above in this study and those that have been previously documented [52], suggesting larger emergent adults in presence of predators. In the current study, result show no overall significant effect of the predator presence when we combine the two experiments involving the two reciprocal hybrids in our analysis. Taken separately, predators effects on females body size were strongly significant (Fig 7), truly indicating larger females in presence of predators. Female size was found to be similar for the three genotypes of An. coluzzii, reciprocal hybrids and An. gambiae in presence of predators as well as in absence of predators. Nevertheless, the trend of intermediate size of the hybrid COL/GAM and those of larger size in the hybrid GAM/COL compared to the parental species in presence of predator suggest a strong relationship between the body size and the development time. Results from this study are consistent with findings in many other studies which have reported that the larval development and the body sizes of adult mosquitoes are larval food and density-dependent, thereby affecting fitness components [55–57]. In this experiment, mosquitoes may have access to more food in the predator presence, which may have led to a larger size relative to the absence of predator. However, mosquito larvae, including those of Anopheles species are known to adopt a low-risk behavior in habitats where conspicuous predators are present, spending more of their time resting and less time feeding [28, 29, 34, 58]. Such plasticity in behavior and life-history traits reflects changes in foraging cost/benefit in response to predators, a phenomenon that is widespread in invertebrate prey-predator systems [53, 54, 59–61].
Conclusion
In replicated transplantation experiments of An. gambiae, An. coluzzii and reciprocal hybrids, predator presence was shown to strongly negatively impact larval survivorship and its effect was stronger in males and genotype dependent. In presence of predators, the parental species An. coluzzii and the COL/GAM hybrid survived better than An. gambiae and the reciprocal hybrid GAM/COL. These results highlight a strong maternal effect on larval responses to predators that is compatible with male X chromosome silencing or possibly other genetic or epigenetic processes. A consequence of this maternal effect, there was no measurable fitness cost on F1 hybrids as their survival and development matched that of their mother. The negative impact of predation on larval density led to larger body size of surviving females, and an unexpected shortening of their developmental time. Thus, these findings show how predation pressure experienced by larvae have implication on life-history traits of An. coluzzii, An. gambiae and their hybrids and they contribute to our understanding of reproductive barriers between sibling species. Future experiments focusing on backcross hybrids may help identify whether hybrid fitness costs play a role in other important phenotypes beyond the larval stage and F1 generation. These future investigations will help determine how patterns of gene flow between An. coluzzii and An. gambiae impact hybrid fitness, and will help us understand how hybrid fitness will impact the efficacy of genetic vector control strategies for vector control and eradication.
Material and methods
Mosquito collection and laboratory rearing
Indoor resting gravid females belonging to Anopheles genus were collected using mouth aspirators during the rainy season from July to September 2012 in VK5 (4° 25’ 00”W,11° 24’ N) and Soumousso (4° 02’45” W; 11° 00’ 46” N), in western Burkina Faso. Mosquitoes were transported to the insectary at the Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) in Bobo-Dioulasso and maintained under standard conditions (28 ± 1°C, 80 ± 10% RH and 12–12 L:D). Thereafter, they were provided with 5% glucose solution for two nights. On the third day after collection, each female was placed in an individual cup for egg-laying. Females that laid eggs were killed and placed individually in tubes for identification as belonging to An. gambiae s.l. using the morphological key described by Gillies & De Meillon [62] and, then identified to species level using the PCR diagnostic [63, 64]. Newly hatched larvae from families identified as An. coluzzii or An. gambiae were pooled by species and reared in similar conditions. When they reached the pupal stage, they were sexed and placed in separate female and male cages. Following emergence, virgin adults were kept in these cages for three to five days supplied with 5% glucose solution.
Forced mating procedure
Females were fed with blood of rabbits using an artificial blood feeding system and force mated on the fourth day. Females were briefly anesthetized with ether and laid on white filter paper, ventral side up. Males were fixed on insect pins by the thorax. The legs and heads of males were removed before they were presented to the females. Males were stimulated by gentle stroking of the genitalia with the female genitalia to induce copulation. Copulated females were kept for two days with 5% glucose solution and blood fed again. Thereafter, they were placed in individual cups for oviposition. To generate parental species and their reciprocal hybrids forced mating was done as follow: female An. coluzzii × male An. coluzzii; female An. coluzzii × male An. gambiae; female An. gambiae × male An. coluzzii and female An. gambiae × male An. gambiae.
Transplant experiment
Parental species An. coluzzii and An. gambiae and, their F1 hybrids from reciprocal crosses COL/GAM and GAM/COL were transplanted in permanent larvae habitats of rice fields in Bama with or without predation effect by using transplant cages as described in Diabaté et al, 2008. Cylindrical cages of 70 cm diameter and 80 cm height were made of metal frame fitted from the bottom to the middle with a cloth. The elliptic pores of the cloth with a mean length of 0.12 mm and mean width of 0.08 mm contain the larvae but allow exchange of water, small particles, and microorganisms. The cage was covered with a mosquito net from the middle to the top, to avoid that adult mosquitoes and other invertebrates enter or exit the cage. The cage was fixed to the ground and secured by three stakes. First-instar larvae (L1) were randomly chosen on the day of hatch and used for establishing experimental cohorts of 150 larvae each. A precedent study [24] has showed no sex distortion in mean sex ratio at emergence in An. coluzzii, An. gambiae and their reciprocal hybrids. One experimental combination included fifty larvae from each of the three lineages An. coluzzii, F1 Hybrid COL/GAM and An. gambiae. Similarly, 150 larvae from each of the three following lineages An. coluzzii, F1 Hybrid GAM/COL and An. gambiae were also pooled into the second experimental combination. Both cohorts of larvae were reared in the absence and presence of two individuals of backswimmer, Anisops jaczewskii Hutchinson 1928 (Hemiptera: Notonectidae). This species was previously found to be the most abundant predator of Anopheles larvae widely spread throughout the rice field area of Bama [26]. It has been used in several studies for estimating the predation effect on mosquito larvae [26, 28, 29, 34]. Late 4th and 5th instars juveniles of backswimmer were collected and kept in the insectary and starved for 48 hours prior to the experiments. Experiments in which one or both backswimmers were died or escaped were removed from the analysis. Emerging adults from each cage were collected daily, counted and placed in micro tubes containing 70% alcohol for further identification by PCR diagnostic and wing measurements.
Parental species and hybrid identification
DNA extraction from a single leg was used for identifying emergent females to species level by PCR [63]. Because hybrid males are hemizygous for the X-chromosome they cannot be identified using the species molecular diagnostics based on polymorphisms in the rDNA region of that chromosome [63, 64]. Consequently, only emerging females were used for the subsequent analysis.
Wing size measurement
Because adult body size in anopheline mosquitoes depends strongly on environmental conditions during larval development [65], processes affecting larvae are directly linked to the final adult size [66]. Moreover, body size and wing length were found positively correlated in anopheline mosquitoes [67]. Wings from newly emergent adults were dissected, mounted dry on microscope slides, and photographed using a Leica EZ4 D (Leica Microsystems, Suisse) microscope. The wing length was measured using the software Image J1.41.0 (Wayne Rasband National Institute of Health, USA), including a random number of mosquitoes for which the right wing is intact. The length was measured as described previously from the posterior anal cell margin to the tip of radial vein 3 excluding fringe scales. [68]. To reduce confounding effects, only wings from the right side of the mosquitoes were selected and measurements were conducted by the same person.
Ethical considerations
A visit to the collection sites was organised prior to any activity in order to meet the administrative and customary authorities of the VK5 and Soumousso villages to explain the objectives of the study and obtain their consent to participate in the study. Participation is completely voluntary and consists of giving access to the interior of one's home for the collection of female mosquitoes or to one's field for transplanting experiments in the rice fields in Bama. Any information on the identity of the participants will not be divulged in any way by the research team, the project coordinators or any other person involved in the study. All names were coded in order to remain anonymous. The owner decides whether or not to participate. He will not be penalized in any way if he refuses. Likewise, he can, if he wishes, freely decide to stop participating in this study. We have obtained ethical consent for the study in general from the local village councils and leaders, as well as specific consent from the owners of the houses or the rice fields.
Statistical analyses
The results were analyzed to evaluate if there is a statistically significant difference between the predator-present cages and the predator-free cages, in terms of mortality at emergence, development time of larvae and size of newly emerging adults. Statistical analyses were carried out using the software JMP 10 (SAS Institute, Inc) through Logistic Regression Modelling.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the communities of Soumousso and VK5, who have been very helpful in allowing for regular collections of mosquitoes in their villages. We also thank the many colleagues who have generously contributed ideas suggestions for this work, with special thanks to RN Millogo for his help with larval transplantation and emerging adult collection.
References
- 1.
Coyne JA& O. Speciation—Appendix & Intro. 2004.
- 2. Johnson N. Hybrid Incompatibility and Speciation. Nat Educ. 2008;1: 20. Available: http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/hybrid-incompatibility-and-speciation-820
- 3. Coetzee M, Hunt RH, Wilkerson R, Torre A Della, Coulibaly MB, et al. Anopheles coluzzii and anopheles amharicus, new members of the anopheles gambiae complex. Zootaxa. 2013. pmid:26131476
- 4.
WHO. World Malaria Report 2016. World Heal Organ. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1071/EC12504
- 5. Kamali M, Xia A, Tu Z, Sharakhov I V. A New Chromosomal Phylogeny Supports the Repeated Origin of Vectorial Capacity in Malaria Mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae Complex. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8. pmid:23055932
- 6. Fontaine MC, Pease JB, Steele A, Waterhouse RM, Neafsey DE, Sharakhov I V., et al. Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics. Science (80-). 2015. pmid:25431491
- 7. White BJ, Collins FH, Besansky NJ. Evolution of Anopheles gambiae in Relation to Humans and Malaria. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2011.
- 8. Lee Y, Marsden CD, Norris LC, Collier TC, Main BJ, Fofana A, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110: 19854–19859. pmid:24248386
- 9. Aboagye-Antwi F, Alhafez N, Weedall GD, Brothwood J, Kandola S, Paton D, et al. Experimental Swap of Anopheles gambiae’s Assortative Mating Preferences Demonstrates Key Role of X-Chromosome Divergence Island in Incipient Sympatric Speciation. PLoS Genet. 2015. pmid:25880677
- 10. Diabate A, Tripet F. Targeting male mosquito mating behaviour for malaria control. Parasites and Vectors. 2015. pmid:26113015
- 11. Diabaté A, Dao A, Yaro AS, Adamou A, Gonzalez R, Manoukis NC, et al. Spatial swarm segregation and reproductive isolation between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009. pmid:19734189
- 12. Diabaté A, Yaro AS, Dao A, Diallo M, Huestis DL, Lehmann T. Spatial distribution and male mating success of Anopheles gambiae swarms. BMC Evol Biol. 2011. pmid:21711542
- 13. Dabire KR, Sawadodgo S, Diabate A, Toe KH, Kengne P, Ouari A, et al. Assortative mating in mixed swarms of the mosquito anopheles gambiae s.s. m and s molecular forms, in burkina faso, west africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2013. pmid:23360106
- 14. Sawadogo SP, Costantini C, Pennetier C, Diabaté A, Gibson G, Dabiré RK. Differences in timing of mating swarms in sympatric populations of Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae s.s. (formerly An. gambiae M and S molecular forms) in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Parasites and Vectors. 2013. pmid:24330578
- 15. Sawadogo PS, Namountougou M, Toé KH, Rouamba J, Maïga H, Ouédraogo KR, et al. Swarming behaviour in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae and An. coluzzii: Review of 4 years survey in rural areas of sympatry, Burkina Faso (West Africa). Acta Trop. 2014.
- 16. Niang A, Epopa PS, Sawadogo SP, Maïga H, Konaté L, Faye O, et al. Does extreme asymmetric dominance promote hybridization between Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae s.s. in seasonal malaria mosquito communities of West Africa? Parasites and Vectors. 2015;8. pmid:26559354
- 17. Marsden CD, Lee Y, Nieman CC, Sanford MR, Dinis J, Martins C, et al. Asymmetric introgression between the M and S forms of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae, maintains divergence despite extensive hybridization. Mol Ecol. 2011. pmid:22059383
- 18. Reidenbach KR, Neafsey DE, Costantini C, Sagnon N, Simard F, Ragland GJ, et al. Patterns of genomic differentiation between ecologically differentiated M and S forms of anopheles gambiae in West and Central Africa. Genome Biol Evol. 2012. pmid:23132896
- 19. Weetman D, Wilding CS, Steen K, Pinto J, Donnelly MJ. Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between anopheles gambiae M and S forms. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29: 279–291. pmid:21836185
- 20. Oliveira E, Salgueiro P, Palsson K, Vicente JL, Arez AP, Jaenson TG, et al. High Levels of Hybridization between Molecular Forms of Anopheles gambiae from Guinea Bissau. J Med Entomol. 2008;45: 1057–1063. pmid:19058629
- 21. Simard F, Ayala D, Kamdem GC, Pombi M, Etouna J, Ose K, et al. Ecological niche partitioning between Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in Cameroon: The ecological side of speciation. BMC Ecol. 2009. pmid:19460146
- 22. Caputo B, Nwakanma D, Jawara M, Adiamoh M, Dia I, Konate L, et al. Anopheles gambiae complex along the Gambia river, with particular reference to the molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. Malar J. 2008. pmid:18803885
- 23. Tripet F, Touré YT, Taylor CE, Norris DE, Dolo G, Lanzaro GC. DNA analysis of transferred sperm reveals significant levels of gene flow between molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae. Mol Ecol. 2001;10: 1725–1732. pmid:11472539
- 24. Diabaté A, Dabire RK, Millogo N, Lehmann T. Evaluating the Effect of Postmating Isolation Between Molecular Forms of Anopheles gambiaes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2007. pmid:17294921
- 25. Diabaté A, Dabire RK, Kim EH, Dalton R, Millogo N, Baldet T, et al. Larval Development of the Molecular Forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Different Habitats: A Transplantation Experiment. J Med Entomol. 2006.
- 26. Diabaté A, Dabiré RK, Heidenberger K, Crawford J, Lamp WO, Culler LE, et al. Evidence for divergent selection between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: Role of predation. BMC Evol Biol. 2008. pmid:18190719
- 27. Lehmann T, Diabate A. The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: A phenotypic perspective. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2008. pmid:18640289
- 28. Gimonneau G, Pombi M, Dabiré RK, Diabaté A, Morand S, Simard F. Behavioural responses of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso. Parasites and Vectors. 2012. pmid:22463735
- 29. Gimonneau G, Bouyer J, Morand S, Besansky NJ, Diabate A, Simard F. A behavioral mechanism underlying ecological divergence in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Behav Ecol. 2010. pmid:22476108
- 30. Service MW. Mortalities of the immature stages of species b of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Kenya: Comparison between rice fields and temporary pools, identification of predators, and effects of insecticidal spraying. J Med Entomol. 1977.
- 31. Munga S, Minakawa N, Zhou G, Githeko AK, Yan G. Survivorship of Immature Stages of Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in Natural Habitats in Western Kenya Highlands. J Med Entomol. 2007;44: 758–764. pmid:17915505
- 32. Sunahara T, Ishizaka K, Mogi M. Habitat size: a factor determining the opportunity for encounters between mosquito larvae and aquatic predators. J Vector Ecol. 2002;27: 8–20. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12125876 pmid:12125876
- 33. Minakawa N, Sonye G, Mogi M, Yan G. Habitat characteristics of Anopheles gambiae s.s. larvae in a Kenyan highland. Med Vet Entomol. 2004. pmid:15347399
- 34. Roux O, Diabaté A, Simard F. Larvae of cryptic species of Anopheles gambiae respond differently to cues of predation risk. Freshw Biol. 2013.
- 35. Roux O, Diabaté A, Simard F. Divergence in threat sensitivity among aquatic larvae of cryptic mosquito species. J Anim Ecol. 2014. pmid:24138173
- 36. Nwakanma DC, Neafsey DE, Jawara M, Adiamoh M, Lund E, Rodrigues A, et al. Breakdown in the process of incipient speciation in Anopheles gambiae. Genetics. 2013;193: 1221–1231. pmid:23335339
- 37. Mogi M, Chan KL. Predatory habits of dipteran larvae inhabiting Nepenthes pitchers. Raffles Bull Zool. 1996.
- 38. Howard AFV, Zhou G, Omlin FX. Malaria mosquito control using edible fish in western Kenya: Preliminary findings of a controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2007. pmid:17688686
- 39. Bernardo J. Maternai effects in animal ecology. Am Zool. 1996;36: 83–105.
- 40. Mousseau TA, Fox CW. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998;13: 403–407. pmid:21238360
- 41. Wolf JB, Wade MJ. What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364: 1107–1115. pmid:19324615
- 42. Mayer F, Berger D, Gottsberger B, Schulze W. Non-ecological radiations in acoustically communicating grasshoppers? Evolution in Action: Case studies in Adaptive Radiation, Speciation and the Origin of Biodiversity. 2010.
- 43. Eizadshenass S, Singh RS, Bell J. Maternal effect and speciation: Maternal effect contributes to the evolution of hybrid inviability between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Genome. 2015. pmid:26436586
- 44. Clemens J, Krämer S, Ronacher B. Asymmetrical integration of sensory information during mating decisions in grasshoppers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. pmid:25368152
- 45. Clemens J, Aufderheide J, Ronacher B. Relative weighting of acoustic information during mating decisions in grasshoppers indicates signatures of sexual selection. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sensory, Neural, Behav Physiol. 2017. pmid:28733816
- 46. Dagmar von Helversen O. Verhaltensgenetische Untersuchungen am akustischen Kommunikationssystem der Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae)—II. Das Lautschema von Artbastarden zwischen Chorthippus biguttulus und Ch. mollis. J Comp Physiol A. 1975.
- 47. Dagmar D, von Helversen O. Verhaltensgenetische Untersuchungen am akustischen Kommunikationssystem der Feldheuschrecken (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A. 1975.
- 48. Chandrasegaran K, Juliano SA. How do trait-mediated non-lethal effects of predation affect population-level performance of mosquitoes? Front Ecol Evol. 2019. pmid:31218216
- 49. Niori L, Dessen EMB, Perondini ALP. A gene that modifies the sex ratio in a bisexual strain of sciara ocellaris. Heredity (Edinb). 1979. pmid:290587
- 50. Agnew P, C. Koella J, Michalakis Y. Host life history responses to parasitism. Microbes Infect. 2000. pmid:10962272
- 51. Suleman M. The effects of intraspecific competition for food and space on the larval development of Culex quinquefasciatus. Mosquito News. 1982.
- 52. Barrera R, Medialdea V. Development time and resistance to starvation of mosquito larvae. J Nat Hist. 1996.
- 53. Roux O, Vantaux A, Roche B, Yameogo KB, Dabiré KR, Diabaté A, et al. Evidence for carry-over effects of predator exposure on pathogen transmission potential. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015. pmid:26674956
- 54. Chobu M, Nkwengulila G, Mahande AM, Mwang’onde BJ, Kweka EJ. Direct and indirect effect of predators on Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Acta Trop. 2015. pmid:25438260
- 55. Braks MAH, Honório NA, Lounibos LP, Lourenço-De-Oliveira R, Juliano SA. Interspecific Competition Between Two Invasive Species of Container Mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Brazil. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2006.
- 56. Alto BW, Lounibos LP, Higgs S, Juliano SA. Larval competition differentially affects arbovirus infection in Aedes mosquitoes. Ecology. 2005. pmid:19096729
- 57. Reiskind MH, Lounibos LP. Effects of intraspecific larval competition on adult longevity in the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol. 2009. pmid:19239615
- 58. Ferrari MCO, Messier F, Chivers DP. Larval amphibians learn to match antipredator response intensity to temporal patterns of risk. Behav Ecol. 2008.
- 59. Beketov MA, Liess M. Predation risk perception and food scarcity induce alterations of life-cycle traits of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Ecol Entomol. 2007. pmid:18185841
- 60. Costanzo KS, Muturi EJ, Alto BW. Trait-mediated effects of predation across life-history stages in container mosquitoes. Ecol Entomol. 2011. pmid:22419834
- 61. Alto BW, Malicoate J, Elliott SM, Taylor J. Demographic Consequences of Predators on Prey: Trait and Density Mediated Effects on Mosquito Larvae in Containers. PLoS One. 2012. pmid:23152748
- 62. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A Supplement to the Anophelinae of the South of the Sahara (Afrotropical Region). Publications of the South African Institute for Medical Research. 1987.
- 63. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, Della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008. pmid:18724871
- 64. Fanello C, Santolamazza F, Della Torre A. Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP. Med Vet Entomol. 2002. pmid:12510902
- 65. Manoukis NC, Touré MB, Sissoko I, Doumbia S, Traoré SF, Diuk-wasser Maria A, et al. Is Vector Body Size the Key to Reduced Malaria Transmission in the Irrigated Region of Niono, Mali? J Med Entomol. 2006;43: 820–827. pmid:17017214
- 66. Lyimo EO, Takken W, Koella JC. Effect of rearing temperature and larval density on larval survival, age at pupation and adult size of Anopheles gambiae. Entomol Exp Appl. 1992.
- 67. Aboagye-Antwi F, Tripet F. Effects of larval growth condition and water availability on desiccation resistance and its physiological basis in adult Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Malar J. 2010;9: 1–11. pmid:20043863
- 68. Sanford MR, Demirci B, Marsden CD, Lee Y, Cornel AJ, Lanzaro GC. Morphological differentiation may mediate mate-choice between incipient species of Anopheles gambiae s.s. PLoS One. 2011;6. pmid:22132169