Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in children in upper Egypt using assemblage- specific PCR technique

  • Alzahraa Abdelraouf Ahmad ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    zahraaabdelraouf@aun.edu.eg

    Affiliation Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

  • Asmaa M. El-Kady,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt

  • Tasneem M. Hassan

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Abstract

Giardia duodenalis is a common gastrointestinal protozoan parasite, causing diarrheal illness in humans worldwide. Yet, the distribution of G. duodenalis genotypes among human patients and their clinical relevance remains controversial. This study aimed to detect G. duodenalis in children in Upper Egypt and identify causative genotypes and elucidate a possible correlation between genotype and clinical presentation. One hundred sixty-five children, regardless of symptoms, were tested for giardiasis. Giardia positive stool samples (40/165) were subjected to PCR amplification targeting the tpi gene with positive PCR results in only 35 cases (87.5%). Assemblage-specific amplification of genotypes (A, B, and the zoonotic E strains) revealed predominantly G. duodenalis Assemblage A (45.7%). Assemblage B and mixed A and B infections were detected in 31.4% and 22.8% of children, respectively. Assemblage E was not detected. G. duodenalis assemblage A was dominant in children who complained of diarrhea and abdominal cramps. In contrast, asymptomatic children with positive stool samples display a higher frequency of assemblage B and mixed infections. The study highlights the predominance of Giardia Assemblage A in our study locality. This study is the first for this endemic area to use the copro-PCR technique for diagnosis and genotyping of giardiasis. Study results show the value of simple species-specific primers for genotyping in communities with little access to laboratory resources. Further genetic studies are needed to clarify the association between parasite genetic diversity and patient symptomatology.

Introduction

Giardia duodenalis is a cosmopolitan protozoan parasite that affects a wide range of vertebrates, including humans. The WHO included giardiasis in its ‘Neglected Diseases Initiative’ in 2004 in recognition of its significant socio-economic impacts [1]. Giardia duodenalis is a common gastrointestinal pathogen that induces diarrhea, particularly in children in low-income countries [24]. It has been also associated with impaired growth and cognitive function in poor resource settings [57] and developed countries [8]. Human giardiasis prevalence in developed nations ranges from 1 to 8% of the population; however, in developing countries, it exceeds 30% of the population [9]. The prevalence rate in Egypt is up to 30.2% [4].

The distribution of G. duodenalis among humans varies widely as do clinical presentations, which range from absence of gastrointestinal symptoms to acute symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, nausea. Persistent infection can lead to chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and even malabsorption that may cause serious effects on growth and intellectual development of children [1012]

Populations most affected by giardiasis are immunocompromised persons and travelers to areas with high endemic infection rates [13]. However, children are the high-risk group for giardiasis, especially developing countries with inadequate sanitation [1].

The main routes for exposure of infective G. duodenalis cysts are fecal-oral transmission through contaminated food or water sources and direct contact with infected humans or animals [14]. Thus, zoonotic transmission is of great concern [15].

Giardiasis is a challenging disease with increasing spread in the environment. However, routine diagnostic methods still lack sensitivity. Molecular analysis for diagnosis of human pathogens using copro-PCR is a valuable tool with acceptable sensitivity for detection of G. duodenalis in human stools [2].

Molecular characterization of G. duodenalis from different localities reflects complex genetic profiles. Analysis using different molecular tools have targeted several genes, including small-subunit ribosomal RNA (ssu-rRNA), β-giardin (bg), glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh), and triose-phosphate isomerase(tpi) genes [16]. Giardia duodenalis comprises eight major genotypes (Assemblages A to H) based on these loci [17]. The most frequently isolated G. duodenalis assemblages from human stool samples are A and B [18], which are also found in several other mammalian hosts [14]. Other assemblages (C, E, and F) are sporadically isolated from humans in some parts of Africa including Egypt [19, 20]. Assemblage B is responsible for most human infections (58% of the cases). Assemblage A accounts for 37% [17].

To date, the relationship between G. duodenalis genotypes and clinical presentation is still unclear. Published studies have reported conflicting results. Some reported a strong correlation between assemblages and clinical symptoms while others found no such relationship [2125]. Large epidemiological case-control studies conducted in African countries have demonstrated that Giardia duodenalis infections do not seem to be positively associated with acute diarrhoea in young children [2629]. The present study was designed to update genotyping of G. duodenalis in children in Upper Egypt and examine possible correlations among detected genotypes and clinical presentations.

Materials and methods

Study type and populations

The current cross-sectional study was performed during the period from March to May 2018. Participants were 165 children aged three to 12 who visited the outpatient clinic at the Assiut University Children’s Hospital, Egypt, to seek medical advice. Children complained of a range of gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal cramps, and weight loss. Some children were asymptomatic, and stool samples were collected as a part of routine investigations.

Ethical consideration

Informed consent was obtained from children’s guardians and the research was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University. Children positive for any parasitic infection were treated based on clinical presentation and findings in the Pediatric Department.

Collection and processing of samples

A stool sample from each participant was obtained in a dry, clean, labeled plastic container. Each stool sample was divided into three portions. The first portion was used for direct smear examination with Lugol’s iodine, the second was preserved in formalin-saline fixative for concentration and microscopic analysis, and the third was stored without the addition of preservative at—20 °C in Eppendorf tubes for molecular studies.

Copro-nPCR assays

Genomic DNA extraction from stool samples.

Stool samples microscopically positive for Giardia were submitted for DNA extraction in the Molecular Laboratory of the Center of Excellence for Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University using a QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (cat. no. 51504). Extraction of genomic DNA followed the manufacturer’s instructions with some modification. Incubation time and temperature were one hour at 95°C and elution of the extracted DNA used 100 μl of elution buffer. The concentration and purity of DNA were characterized (Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer) and preserved at—20 °C until use in PCR analysis.

Amplification of the tpi gene of Giardia duodenalis.

PCR amplification of the tpi gene for molecular identification of G. duodenalis was performed as described by Sulaiman et al. [30] to generate a PCR product (605 bp) using the following primer sets; AL3543 as the forward primer and AL3546 as the reverse primer (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. The sequence of the primers used in the present study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.t001

The reaction mixture used 25 μl total volume, including 2 μl DNA template, 12.5 μl PCR master mix (1 U of Taq polymerase, 250 μM each of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 10 mM Tris-HCl, 30 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2), 1 μl of each primer, and 8.5 μl nuclease-free water. PCR reaction conditions were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95°C denaturation for 45 sec, annealing at 50°C for 45 sec and extension at 72°C for 60 sec, and final extension step 72°C for 5 min.

Assemblage-specific amplification of Giardia duodenalis genotypes.

Nested PCR with assemblage-specific primers was used to detect Assemblages A, B, and the zoonotic E strain as previously described [31, 32]. A secondary reaction was performed separately for each assemblage using a 1/10 dilution of the first PCR product of the tpi gene as a template.

The reaction conditions were the same as the first run except that annealing temperature for primers A and B was 62 °C and 67 °C for E Primers. A Veriti 96-well thermal cycler (9902, Singapore) was used for PCR amplification. Amplified PCR products were analyzed in 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide using horizontal electrophoresis (Compact M, Biometra, Germany). DNA fragments were visualized under UV illumination. The size of DNA fragments was compared with a 100-bp DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).

Statistical analysis

The study results were analyzed using SPSS software version 16. Categorical and quantitative variables were expressed in percentages. Statistical significance analysis of categorical data used Pearson’s chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test. The calculated p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Participants were children from three to 12 years old. Ninety-three were boys (56.4%), and 88 (53.3%) were from rural areas. Participants presented with a range of symptoms, 75 (44.5%) complained of diarrhea, 22 (13.3%) of flatulence, 19 (11.5%) of abdominal cramps, and 17 (10.3%) weight loss. The remaining 32 (19.4%) patients were asymptomatic, and stool samples were collected as part of routine investigations (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. The sociodemographic data of patients participating in the present study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.t002

Microscopic examination for G. duodenalis identified 40 (24.2%) of 165 cases as positive for giardiasis infection (Table 3). The majority were males (23/40) (57.5%). Children positive for infection were predominantly from rural areas (24/40) (60%). Also, the estimated prevalence of Giardia infection among symptomatic and asymptomatic cases showed a significant association with male patients (Table 4). However, molecular detection for G. duodenalis identified a positive tpi gene band of 605 bp in only 35 cases (87.5%) (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Agarose gel 1.5% stained with ethidium bromide showing PCR products of tpi gene amplification of Giardia duodenalis.

Lane M: Molecular weight marker (100 bp), lane NC: negative control. Lanes (1 to 10): patient samples. The lanes with positive PCR products at 605 bp. Lanes (1, 4 & 7): negative samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.g001

thumbnail
Table 3. The prevalence of Giardia infection among patients with different symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. The prevalence of Giardia infection among symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in relation to gender.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.t004

We identified G. duodenalis Assemblage A in 45.7% (16/35) of cases using Giardia assemblage-specific primers. Assemblage B was identified in 31.4% (11/35) of cases, and mixed infection with A and B assemblages was detected in the remaining cases (22.8%). The zoonotic genotype E was not detected (Figs 2 and 3).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Nested PCR amplification of Giardia species-specific primers in 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide: Showing nested PCR products of Giardia genotype A with positive bands at 332 bp.

Lanes (1–10): positive specimens.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide showing nested PCR amplification of Giardia genotype B with positive bands at 400 bp.

Lanes (4, 7, 9 & 11): negative genotype B specimens. Lane (M): 100 bp molecular weight ladder.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.g003

Demographic distribution of Giardia genotypes suggested that giardiasis was more prevalent in males (57.1%). However, this association was not statistically significant. Rural communities showed higher rates of infection with assemblage A, which was statistically significant (p< 0.05) (17.4%) (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 5. The correlation between different Giardia assemblages and patients’ demographic data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.t005

Also, Assemblage A was prevalent in symptomatic patients, with 37.5% of patients complained of diarrhea and 25% of abdominal cramps. In contrast, asymptomatic individuals represent 45.4% and 75% of patients with Assemblage B and mixed infections, respectively (Table 6 and Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Association between different Giardia assemblages with patient symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.g004

thumbnail
Table 6. The association between different Giardia assemblages and patients’ symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240119.t006

Discussion

Giardiasis is a primary cause of protozoal infection and human diarrhea worldwide. Children are a relatively high-risk group for giardiasis [24, 33]

In the present study, stool samples were collected from 165 children. Microscopy-based prevalence of giardiasis was 24.2%, which is consistent with previous estimates in Egypt that range from 24.7% to 27.9% [34, 35]. Other studies report lower and higher prevalence rates [36, 37]. These differences may be explained by differences in sample size and variation in environmental conditions of studied regions. The majority of infected children were male (57.5%, 23/40), which is likely due to cultural behaviors. Boys tend to be more active outdoors and may have more opportunities for contact with contaminated water or food sources [38].

Several studies targeted different genetic loci in the G. duodenalis genome for molecular characterization with variable degrees of sensitivity and specificity. In the present study, we used the tpi gene for molecular detection of G. duodenalis owing to its high genetic heterogenicity and polymorphism [15, 39]. Genomic DNA of G. duodenalis was identified in 35 of 40 microscopically positive samples (87.5%). False-negative PCR results in Giardia detection were previously reported [4, 4042]. Such results were attributed to factors that may affect the DNA yield, such as the presence of DNA inhibitors in stool samples, sample preservation conditions, and the method or type of DNA extraction kit [43]. Also, variations in amplification conditions, the amplification target gene, and the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertion-deletions, and presence of different Giardia species may cause false-negative findings [44, 45].

The molecular epidemiology of G. duodenalis was studied in different parts in the world to clarify possible relationships among genetic diversity of the parasite and clinical presentation, drug resistance, and environmental transmission dynamics [46, 47]. Our study used species-specific primers to characterize G. duodenalis assemblages isolated from children in Upper Egypt. Giardia assemblage groups (A and B) were isolated in the present study (45.7%, 31.4%, respectively). These findings are in agreement with other studies that showed both assemblages are most frequently associated with human giardiasis based on analysis of multiple human isolates from different geographical regions [23].

Giardia duodenalis Assemblage A is the prevailing genotype in the current study. This assemblage is primarily linked with zoonotic transmission, while Assemblage B is more coupled with human-to-human transmission [48, 49]. However both assemblages have been isolated from humans and domestic animals as dogs, cats and cattle [50]. So, determination of the source of infection may be difficult especially in absence of sub-assemblage analysis. But in the present study we may explain the prevalence of Assemblage A by the significant association between rural residence of the studied population and their high frequency of Assemblage A in stool samples. Close contact with domestic animals and contamination of public water in rural communities provide the opportunity for transmission from animals to humans [51, 52].

The higher prevalence of Assemblage A over Assemblage B was previously reported in from several countries worldwide [5355]. Our results are also consistent with results obtained by Egyptian researchers who reported a higher prevalence of Assemblage A among Egyptian patients diagnosed with giardiasis [51, 56, 57].

Controversially, several reports document the predominance of Giardia Assemblage B in human patients, in Egypt or worldwide [18, 20, 5863]. However, others observed that both assemblages showed about the same distribution in infected patients [64, 65]. The discrepancy in the distribution of Giardia assemblages in human populations observed across countries and even within the same country remains unexplained [46]. The distribution of G. duodenalis genotypes is likely more related to social and epidemiological criteria of the studied populations or the zoonotic potential in the transmission of giardiasis rather than to geographical association.

Interestingly, mixed infection with assemblages A and B were found in 22.8% of participants. Likewise, the presence of multiple genotypes in one host was reported in other studies, particularly in developing countries [61, 66, 67]. These findings emphasize the complexity and dynamics of the parasite in the ecosystem and reflect the presence of genetically different Giardia cysts with mixed sequences contaminating some of the same water and food sources [68, 69]. Further, the occurrence of infection with multiple genotypes favors continued transmission and increased incidence of mixed genotypes in human giardiasis [70]. Interestingly, use of assemblage-specific primers in the current study allowed detection of co-infection with mixed assemblages. Giardia super-infection across populations may occur [17, 31, 71].

The role of the genetic diversity of the parasite and its clinical appearance is a controversial topic [47]. Our study found that Giardia Assemblage A was prevalent in symptomatic patients, where diarrhea and abdominal cramps were the most common presenting symptoms (37.5% and 25%, respectively). This result was consistent with reports of several studies [11, 7275]. Such close associations between Giardia assemblage A and diarrhoea have also been demonstrated in molecular epidemiological studies conducted in Turkey [72], Spain [76], and Bangladesh [77]. Conversely, Giardia Assemblage B and mixed infections were prevalent among asymptomatic individuals (45.4% and 75% of patients, respectively) which is in agreement with Roointan et al. [78] in southwest Iran. Similar to our results, Haque et al. [77] conducted a large scale case control study in Bangladesh involving 3,646 diarrhoeal patients and documented a strong association between assemblage A and symptomatic infection, and between assemblage B and asymptomatic infection, in 211 children under the age of ten.

Unlike our findings, several studies reached different conclusions. Homan and Mank [25] reported that the prevalent genotype in asymptomatic individuals was Giardia Assemblage A, and El-Badry et al. [4] in Egypt and others in different countries reported no substantial association between Giardia genotype and clinical presentation [21, 22]. Differences in study design, criteria for selecting study populations, and small sample size may explain contradictory findings that were observed in our study and may limit the scope of this study. Also, the study missed investigating the presence of associated enteric viral and bacterial pathogens which could be a potential confounder of the obtained results inducing clinical manifestations and disguising the true clinical effect of G. duodenalis infection.

More studies on a large scale population are needed to confirm the association between assemblage and symptomology if any exist. Also, more molecular epidemiological studies on wide geographical regions are crucial to explore parasite genotypes, virulence factors, and environmental sources of infections. Indeed, genotyping studies at the sub-assemblage level are essential to ascertain the occurrence and extent of zoonotic transmission events.

Conclusion

Giardiasis is still a challenging zoonotic disease prevalent among children in the Assiut governorate, Upper Egypt. Our results reveal the predominance of Giardia Assemblage A and the presence of mixed infection in a considerable proportion of the study population. These results suggest the zoonotic transmission of infection in our locality rather than human-to-human transmission. Improved control strategies and social awareness of infection transmission are needed, especially in rural areas. In terms of molecular epidemiology, this study illustrates the usefulness and reliability of simple species-specific primers for genotyping Giardia spp. and detection of mixed infections. Also, findings highlight the need for further genetic studies to clarify possible correlations between parasite genetic diversity and clinical symptomatology.

References

  1. 1. Savioli L, Smith H, Thompson A. Giardia and Cryptosporidium join the “Neglected Diseases Initiative”. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22: 203–208. pmid:16545611
  2. 2. Ramírez JD, Heredia RD, Hernández C, León CM, Moncada LI, Reyes P, et al. Molecular diagnosis and genotype analysis of Giardia duodenalis in asymptomatic children from a rural area in central Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32: 208–213. pmid:25795384
  3. 3. Ismail MAM, El-Akkad DMH, Rizk EMA, El-Askary HM, El-Badry AA. Molecular seasonality of Giardia lamblia in a cohort of Egyptian children: a circannual pattern. Parasitol Res. 2016;115: 4221–4227. pmid:27449642
  4. 4. El-Badry A, Mohammed F, Abdul Gawad E. Predominance of Giardia intestinalis assemblage B in diarrhoeic children in Sharkia, Egypt. Parasitol United J. 2017;10: 39–43.
  5. 5. Berkman DS, Lescano AG, Gilman RH, Lopez SL, Black MM. Effects of stunting, diarrhoeal disease, and parasitic infection during infancy on cognition in late childhood: A follow-up study. Lancet. 2002;359: 564–571. pmid:11867110
  6. 6. Carvalho-Costa FA, Gonçalves AQ, Lassance SL, Da Silva Neto LM, Salmazo CAA, Bóia MN. Giardia lamblia and other intestinal parasitic infections and their relationships with nutritional status in children in Brazilian Amazon. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2007;49: 147–153. pmid:17625691
  7. 7. Halliez MCM, Buret AG. Extra-intestinal and long term consequences of Giardia duodenalis infections. World J Gastroenterol; 2013. 19(47): 8974–8985. pmid:24379622
  8. 8. Azcona-Gutiérrez JM, de Lucio A, Hernández-de-Mingo M, García-García C, Soria-Blanco LM, Morales L, et al. Molecular diversity and frequency of the diarrheagenic enteric protozoan Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in a hospital setting in Northern Spain. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0178575. pmid:28617836
  9. 9. Smith H V., Mank TG. Diagnosis of Human Giardiasis. In: Luján H.D., Svärd S. (eds) Giardia. Springer Vienna; 2011. pp. 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0198-8_22
  10. 10. Robertson LJ, Hanevik K, Escobedo AA, Mørch K, Langeland N. Giardiasis—why do the symptoms sometimes never stop? Trends Parasitol. 2010;26: 75–82. pmid:20056486
  11. 11. Read C, Walters J, Robertson ID, Thompson RCA. Correlation between genotype of Giardia duodenalis and diarrhoea. Int J Parasitol; 2002. 32(2): 229–231. pmid:11812501
  12. 12. Eckmann L. Mucosal defences against Giardia. Parasite Immunol; 2003. 25: 259–270. pmid:12969444
  13. 13. Farthing MJG. GIARDIASIS. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1996;25: 493–515. pmid:8863037
  14. 14. Sprong H, Cacciò SM, Van Der Giessen JWB. Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: 1–12. pmid:19956662
  15. 15. Thompson RCA, Monis PT. Variation in Giardia: Implications for Taxonomy and Epidemiology. Adv Parasitol. 2004;58:69–137. pmid:15603762
  16. 16. Thompson RCA, Monis P. Giardia-From Genome to Proteome. Adv. in Parasitol. Academic Press; 2012;78:. 57–95.
  17. 17. Ryan U, Cacciò SM. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(12–13): 943–956. pmid:23856595
  18. 18. de Lucio A, Martínez-Ruiz R, Merino FJ, Bailo B, Aguilera M, Fuentes I, et al. Molecular Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis Isolates from Symptomatic Individuals Attending Two Major Public Hospitals in Madrid, Spain. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0143981–e0143981. pmid:26641082
  19. 19. Squire SA, Ryan U. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Africa: current and future challenges. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10: 195. pmid:28427454
  20. 20. Foronda P, Bargues MD, Abreu-Acosta N, Periago MV, Valero MA, Valladares B, et al. Identification of genotypes of Giardia intestinalis of human isolates in Egypt. Parasitol Res. 2008;103: 1177–1181. pmid:18622625
  21. 21. Kohli A, Bushen OY, Pinkerton RC, Houpt E, Newman RD, Sears CL, et al. Giardia duodenalis assemblage, clinical presentation and markers of intestinal inflammation in Brazilian children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008/05/16. 2008;102: 718–725. pmid:18485429
  22. 22. Ajjampur SSR, Kang G, Sathyakumar K, Kannan A, Gladstone BP, Sankaran P, et al. Giardia duodenalis Assemblages Associated with Diarrhea in Children in South India Identified by PCR-RFLP. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80: 16–19. pmid:19141832
  23. 23. Breathnach AS, McHugh TD, Bucher PD. Prevalence and clinical correlations of genetic subtypes of Giardia lamblia in an urban setting. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138: 1459–1467. pmid:20144251
  24. 24. Mohammed Mahdy AK, Surin J, Wan KL, Mohd-Adnan A, Al-Mekhlafi MSH, Lim YAL. Giardia intestinalis genotypes: Risk factors and correlation with clinical symptoms. Acta Trop. 2009;112: 67–70. pmid:19560431
  25. 25. Homan WL, Mank TG. Human giardiasis: genotype linked differences in clinical symptomatology. Int J Parasitol. 2001;31: 822–826. pmid:11403774
  26. 26. Kotloff KL. The Burden and Etiology of Diarrheal Illness in Developing Countries. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017;64(4):799–814. pmid:28734511
  27. 27. Breurec S, Vanel N, Bata P, Chartier L, Farra A, Favennec L, et al. Etiology and Epidemiology of Diarrhea in Hospitalized Children from Low Income Country: A Matched Case-Control Study in Central African Republic. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10: e0004283. pmid:26731629
  28. 28. Tellevik MG, Moyo SJ, Blomberg B, Hjøllo T, Maselle SY, Langeland N, et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis, Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia among Young Children with and without Diarrhea in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9. pmid:26452235
  29. 29. Becker SL, Chatigre JK, Gohou J-P, Coulibaly JT, Leuppi R, Polman K, et al. Combined stool-based multiplex PCR and microscopy for enhanced pathogen detection in patients with persistent diarrhoea and asymptomatic controls from Côte d’Ivoire. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21: 591.e1–591.e10. pmid:25743578
  30. 30. Sulaiman IM, Fayer R, Bern C, et al. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(11):1444–1452. pmid:14718089
  31. 31. Geurden T, Geldhof P, Levecke B, Martens C, Berkvens D, Casaert S, et al. Mixed Giardia duodenalis assemblage A and E infections in calves. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38: 259–264. pmid:17854810
  32. 32. Levecke B, Geldhof P, Claerebout E, Dorny P, Vercammen F, Cacciò SM, et al. Molecular Characterisation of Giardia Duodenalis in Captive Non-Human Primates Reveals Mixed Assemblage A and B Infection. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39: 1595–1601. pmid:19523472
  33. 33. Anuar TS, Azreen SN, Salleh FM, Moktar N. Molecular epidemiology of giardiasis among Orang Asli in Malaysia: application of the triosephosphate isomerase gene. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14: 78. pmid:24520940
  34. 34. Curtale F, Nabil M, el Wakeel A, Shamy MY. Anaemia and intestinal parasitic infections among school age children in Behera Governorate, Egypt. Behera Survey Team. J Trop Pediatr. 1998;44(6):323–328. pmid:9972072
  35. 35. Ghieth MA, El-Badry AA, Abu-Sarea EY, Abdel Gawad SS, Elsharkawy MM. Genotypic analysis of Giardia duodenalis in children at Egypt. Comp Clin Path. 2016;25: 1241–1246.
  36. 36. el-Beshbishi SN, Abdel-Magied AA, el-Nahas HA et al. Geoparasites in rural Dakahlia Governorate, a preliminary based study for development of the community-based intervention programs. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2005;35: 1051‐1070. pmid:16333910
  37. 37. Yu F, Amer S, Qi M, Wang R, Wang Y, Zhang S, et al. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis isolated from patients in Egypt. Acta Trop. 2019;196: 66–71. pmid:31100269
  38. 38. Al-difaie RS. Molecular Study to Detect Genotyping of Giardia lamblia from Human and Cattle Feces in Al-Qadisiya. Ibn Al-Haitham J Pure Appl Sci. 2016;29: 1–13.
  39. 39. Huey CS, Mahdy MAK, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Nasr NA, Lim YAL, Mahmud R, et al. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in Malaysia. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;17: 269–276. pmid:23624189
  40. 40. El-Shazly AM, Mowafy N, Soliman M, El-Bendary M, Morsy ATA, Ramadan NII, et al. Egyptian genotyping of Giardia lamblia. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2004;34: 265–80. pmid:15125532
  41. 41. Gelanew T, Lalle M, Hailu A, Pozio E, Cacciò SM. Molecular characterization of human isolates of Giardia duodenalis from Ethiopia. Acta Trop. 2007;102: 92–99. pmid:17498637
  42. 42. Nasr D, Yousof H-A, Tyler K, El-Badry A, Rubio J, El-Dib N. Giardia intestinalis assemblages among Egyptian symptomatic/asymptomatic cases in Cairo. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2018;48: 465–474.
  43. 43. Abbaszadegan MR, Velayati A, Tavasoli A, Dadkhah E. Rapid DNA extraction protocol from stool, suitable for molecular genetic diagnosis of colon cancer. Iran Biomed J. 2007;11: 203–208. pmid:18051782
  44. 44. Franzén O, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Castro E, Sherwood E, Ankarklev J, Reiner DS, et al. Draft genome sequencing of giardia intestinalis assemblage B isolate GS: is human giardiasis caused by two different species? PLoS Pathog. 2009/08/21. 2009;5: e1000560–e1000560. pmid:19696920
  45. 45. Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Franzén O, Ankarklev J, Xu F, Nohýnková E, Andersson JO, et al. Genome analysis and comparative genomics of a Giardia intestinalis assemblage E isolate. BMC Genomics. 2010;11: 543. pmid:20929575
  46. 46. Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24: 110–140. pmid:21233509
  47. 47. Cacciò SM, Sprong H. Epidemiology of Giardiasis in Humans. In: Luján H.D., Svärd S. (eds) Giardia. Springer Vienna; 2011. pp. 17–28.
  48. 48. van Keulen H, Macechko PT, Wade S, Schaaf S, Wallis PM, Erlandsen SL. Presence of human Giardia in domestic, farm and wild animals, and environmental samples suggests a zoonotic potential for giardiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2002;108: 97–107. pmid:12208038
  49. 49. Trout JM, Santín M, Greiner E, Fayer R. Prevalence and genotypes of Giardia duodenalis in post-weaned dairy calves. Vet Parasitol. 2005;130: 177–183. pmid:15925721
  50. 50. Itagaki T, Kinoshita S, Aoki M, Itoh N, Saeki H, Sato N, et al. Genotyping of Giardia intestinalis from domestic and wild animals in Japan using glutamete dehydrogenase gene sequencing. Vet Parasitol. 2005;133: 283–287. pmid:16029929
  51. 51. Helmy MMF, Abdel-Fattah HS, Rashed L. Real-Time Pcr/rflp Assay to Detect Giardia intestinalis Genotypes in Human Isolates with Diarrhea in Egypt. J Parasitol. 2009;95: 1000–1004. pmid:19254068
  52. 52. Volotão AC, Costa-Macedo LM, Haddad FSM, Brandão A, Peralta JM, Fernandes O. Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis from human and animal samples from Brazil using β-giardin gene: A phylogenetic analysis. Acta Trop. 2007;102: 10–19. pmid:17428432
  53. 53. Al-Mohammed HI. Genotypes of Giardia intestinalis clinical isolates of gastrointestinal symptomatic and asymptomatic Saudi children. Parasitol Res. 2010;108: 1375–1381. pmid:20838811
  54. 54. Sarkari B, Ashrafmansori A, Hatam GR, Asgari Q, Mohammadpour I. Genotyping of Giardia lamblia isolates from human in southern Iran. Trop Biomed. 2012;29: 366–371. pmid:23018499
  55. 55. Alyousefi NA, Mahdy MAK, Xiao L, Mahmud R, Lim YAL. Molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis in Yemen. Exp Parasitol. 2013;134: 141–147. pmid:23523861
  56. 56. Abdel Moneim S.M. and Sultan D.M. Genetic Characterization of Giardia Lamblia Isolates From Egyptian Patients With Relation to Clinical Giardiasis. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2008;38(2):547–560. pmid:18853627
  57. 57. Sadek G, El-Settawy M, Nasr S. Genotypic characterization of Giardia duodenalis in children in Menoufiya and Sharkiya governorates, Egypt. Life Sci J. 2013;10: 4006–4015.
  58. 58. Soliman RH, Fuentes I, Rubio JM. Identification of a novel Assemblage B subgenotype and a zoonotic Assemblage C in human isolates of Giardia intestinalis in Egypt. Parasitol Int. 2011;60: 507–51 pmid:21989040
  59. 59. Amer SER. Genotypic and Phylogenetic Characterization of Giardia Intestinalis from Human and Dairy Cattle in Kafr El Sheikh Governorate, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2013;43: 133–146. pmid:23697022
  60. 60. El-tantawy NL, Taman AI. The epidemiology of Giardia intestinalis assemblages A and B among Egyptian children with diarrhea: A PCR–RFLP-based approach. 2014; 104–109.
  61. 61. Amar CFL, Dear PH, McLauchlin J. Detection and genotyping by real-time PCR/RFLP analyses of Giardia duodenalis from human faeces. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52: 681–683. pmid:12867562
  62. 62. Tungtrongchitr A, Sookrung N, Indrawattana N, Kwangsi S, Ongrotchanakun J, Chaicumpa W. Giardia intestinalis in Thailand: identification of genotypes. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28: 42–52. pmid:20214085
  63. 63. Ramírez JD, Heredia RD, Hernández C, León CM, Moncada LI, Reyes P, et al. Molecular diagnosis and genotype analysis of Giardia duodenalis in asymptomatic children from a rural area in central Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32: 208–213. pmid:25795384
  64. 64. Choy SH, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy MAK, Nasr NN, Sulaiman M, Lim YAL, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Giardia infection among indigenous communities in rural Malaysia. Sci Rep. 2014;4: 6909. pmid:25366301
  65. 65. Bahrami F, Zamini GH, Haghighi A, Khademerfan MB. Detection and molecular identification of human giardia isolates in the west of Iran. Biomed Res. 2017;28: 5687–5692.
  66. 66. Geurden T, Levecke B, Cacci SM, Visser A, De Groote G, Casaert S, et al. Multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in non-outbreak related cases of diarrhoea in human patients in Belgium. Parasitol. 2009;136: 1161–1168. pmid:19631012
  67. 67. Almeida A, Pozio E, Cacciò SM. Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis cysts by new real-time PCR assays for detection of mixed infections in human samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010/01/15. 2010;76: 1895–1901. pmid:20080999
  68. 68. ElBakri A, Samie A, Bessong P, Potgieter N, Odeh RA. Detection and molecular characterisation of Giardia lamblia genotypes in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108: 466–473. pmid:24906796
  69. 69. Read CM, Monis PT, Andrew Thompson RC. Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infect Genet Evol. 2004;4: 125–130. pmid:15157630
  70. 70. Sprong H, Cacciò SM, van der Giessen JWB, partners Z network and. Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3: e558–e558. pmid:19956662
  71. 71. Vanni I, Cacciò SM, van Lith L, Lebbad M, Svärd SG, Pozio E, et al. Detection of Giardia duodenalis Assemblages A and B in Human Feces by Simple, Assemblage-Specific PCR Assays. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6: 1–9. pmid:22953009
  72. 72. Aydin AF, Besirbellioglu BA, Avci IY, Tanyuksel M, Araz E, Pahsa A. Classification of Giardia duodenalis parasites in Turkey into groups A and B using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;50: 147–151. pmid:15474326
  73. 73. Haque R, Roy S, Kabir M, Stroup SE, Mondal D, Houpt ER. Giardia Assemblage A Infection and Diarrhea in Bangladesh. J Infect Dis. 2005;192: 2171–2173. pmid:16288384
  74. 74. Sahagún J, Clavel A, Goñi P, Seral C, Llorente MT, Castillo FJ, et al. Correlation between the presence of symptoms and the Giardia duodenalis genotype. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;27: 81–83. pmid:17943329
  75. 75. Cardona GA, Carabin H, Goñi P, Arriola L, Robinson G, Fernández-Crespo JC, et al. Identification and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in children and cattle populations from the province of Álava, North of Spain. Sci Total Environ. 2011;412–413: 101–108. pmid:22030246
  76. 76. Sahagún J, Goñi P, Seral C, Castillo FJ, Sahagún J, Clavel A, et al. Correlation between the presence of symptoms and the Giardia duodenalis genotype. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 2008;27(1):81–83. pmid:17943329
  77. 77. Haque R, Mondal D, Karim A, Molla IH, Rahim A, Faruque ASG, et al. Prospective Case‐Control Study of the Association between Common Enteric Protozoal Parasites and Diarrhea in Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48: 1191–1197. pmid:19323634
  78. 78. Roointan ES, Rafiei A, Samarbaf-Zadeh AR, Shayesteh AA, Shamsizadeh A, Pourmahdi Borujeni M. Genotype analysis of giardia lamblia isolated from children in Ahvaz, Southwest of Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2013;6.