http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-9054
Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Worldwide, 25 million unsafe abortions (45% of all abortions) occurred every year between 2010 and 2014 and 97%, occurred in low-and-middle income countries. Abortion among adolescent girls and young women (15–24 years) is a major public health issue, especially in low-and middle-income countries, including Ghana. Using data from the 2017 Maternal Health Survey, we sought to examine the association between mass media exposure and adolescent girls and young women’s self-efficacy in abortion decision making.
Materials and methods
A sample of 5,664 adolescent girls and young women in Ghana was considered in this study. Both descriptive and inferential analytical approaches were employed to analyse the data. The descriptive analytical approach involved the use of proportions to illustrate the proportion of adolescent girls and young women who had self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. Self-efficacy in abortion decision-making was derived from the question ‘Could you decide on your own to get an abortion?’ Respondents who answered “Yes” to this question were considered as having self-efficacy in abortion decision making. At the inferential level, a chi-square test and bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were employed with statistical significance pegged at p-value <0.05. The results of the bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were presented using crude and adjusted odds ratios respectively.
Results
Less than a quarter of adolescent girls and young women (24%) in Ghana had self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. We further found that adolescent girls and young women who were exposed to mass media had higher odds in self-efficacy in abortion decision-making compared to those who were not exposed to the mass media [AOR = 1.55, CI = 1.14–2.11]. It was also found that adolescent girls and young women aged 20–24 [AOR = 1.45, CI = 1.25–1.68], those who were cohabiting [AOR = 1.40, CI = 1.02–1.93], and those from the Ashanti region [AOR = 2.39, CI = 1.85–3.07] had higher odds on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. On the other hand, adolescent girls and young women from the Eastern Region [AOR = 0.52, CI = 0.36–0.73] and those belonging to the Ga-Adangbe ethnic group [AOR = 0.70, CI = 0.50–0.99] had lower odds in self-efficacy in abortion decision-making.
Conclusion
Less than a quarter of adolescent girls and young women in Ghana have self-efficacy in abortion decision-making which can affect adolescent girls and young women’s future abortion seeking behaviours. Exposure to mass media was strongly associated with self-efficacy in abortion decision making. We recommend that policy makers should promote mass media campaigns scheduled on regular intervals in order to inform the target audience about safe abortions in Ghana. This could go a long way to ensure that cases of unsafe abortions are reduced to the starkest minimum.
Citation: Ahinkorah BO, Seidu A-A, Mensah GY, Budu E (2020) Mass media exposure and self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana: Analysis of the 2017 Maternal Health Survey. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0239894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239894
Editor: Frank T. Spradley, University of Mississippi Medical Center, UNITED STATES
Received: June 17, 2020; Accepted: September 15, 2020; Published: October 9, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Ahinkorah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The dataset is freely available to the public at https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Ghana_Special_2017.cfm?flag=0.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Abortion among adolescent girls and young women (15–24 years) is a major public health issue, especially in low-and middle-income countries [1–3]. Worldwide, 25 million unsafe abortions (45% of all abortions) occurred every year between 2010 and 2014 and 97%, occurred in low-and-middle income countries [4]. According to the Guttmacher Institute [5], 2.5 million unsafe abortions occur each year, in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) among adolescents aged 15–19. In Ghana, of 1880 women aged 15–49 years who induced abortion in the period 2012–2017, 64% of them had an unsafe induced abortion [6].
The high prevalence of unsafe induced abortion can be attributed to the societal perception that ‘abortion is a sin’ and thus, those who seek and those who provide abortion services are often stigmatised [7]. This makes it difficult for women, especially adolescent girls and young women, to openly seek for abortion services and this affects their abortion decision-making.
One of the key contexts to understand women’s abortion decision making is their abortion-specific experiences which may include their access to health facilities for pregnancy testing and relevant diagnosis and their ability to disclose the information to others such as partner, family and friends with attendant implications [8]. Such experiences are often influenced by their self-efficacy [9]. Self-efficacy may be described as the belief we have in our own abilities, specifically our ability to meet the challenges ahead of us and complete a task successfully [10]. In relation to abortion decision-making, adolescent girls and young women who feel that they are able to take sole decisions on their own reproductive health may be more likely to accomplish these goals. Self-efficacy may therefore, be relevant for predicting adolescent girls and young women’s future abortion-seeking behaviours [9].
Over the past few decades, media campaigns have been used as an attempt to enhance various health behaviours in mass populations [11]. Typical campaigns have placed messages in media that target audiences, most frequently through television or radio, but also outdoor media, such as billboards and posters, and print media, such as magazines and newspapers [12]. Exposure to such messages is generally passive, resulting from an incidental effect of routine use of media. Some campaigns incorporate new technologies (eg, the internet, mobile phones and personal digital assistants) [11]. Like any other health information, information on abortion can be accessed through the media [13,14]. In Ghana, media campaigns such as “TimetoTalkGH” “Smash abortion stigma” have helped to enhance the knowledge of women on safe abortion and improved their reproductive health in general [15].
With the advent of internet, it is expected that a lot more of adolescent girls and young women in Ghana will have information on abortion laws and services in the country. Whether or not exposure to media such as newspaper, radio, television and internet improves the self-efficacy in abortion decision-making of adolescent girls and young women in Ghana or not is unknown. Using data from the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey (GMHS), we examined the association between mass media exposure and decision-making regarding abortion among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana. We hypothesized that adolescent girls and young women who have been exposed to media are able to decide on their own to have an induced abortion.
Materials and methods
Data source
Data for the study was obtained from the 2017 GMHS. It is the second nationally representative household survey after the 2007 GMHS that collects comprehensive information on maternal health issues, maternal mortality, and specific causes of death among women in Ghana. The survey gathered information on maternal health using two phases. In the first phase, 900 enumeration areas (EAs) (466 in urban areas and 434 in rural areas) were selected. The second phase involved an interview of 6,324 households, and in these households, 25,062 eligible women, aged 15–49 were asked questions about a wide range of maternal health-related issues including pregnancies, live births, abortions and miscarriages, and utilization of health services about these events. The goals of the 2017 GMHS were to collect nationally representative data that will allow an assessment of the level of maternal mortality in Ghana for the country as a whole and the Coastal, Middle, and Northern zones and identify specific causes of maternal and non-maternal deaths. Based on these goals, the survey sought to collect data on women’s perceptions of and experiences with antenatal, maternity, and emergency obstetrical care, especially with regard to care received before, during, and following the termination of a pregnancy, and to measure indicators of the utilization of maternal health services, especially post-abortion care services [16]. For this study, only adolescent girls and young women (15–24 years) were considered. The total sample of eligible adolescent girls and young women with complete information in the dataset was 5,664. Hence, the sample size used in this study was 5,664. In this study, we relied on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology’ (STROBE) statement in writing the manuscript. The dataset is freely available to the public at https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset/Ghana_Special_2017.cfm?flag=0.
Measurement of variables
Dependent variable.
The dependent variable for the study was self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. Self-efficacy in abortion decision-making was derived from the question ‘Could you decide on your own to get an abortion? [9]. Those who answered “Yes” to this question were considered as having self-efficacy in abortion decision making whiles those who responded “No” to the question were considered as not having self-efficacy in abortion decision making. These responses were coded as 1 = “Yes” and 0 = “No”.
Independent variable.
The main independent variable for the study was mass media exposure (Radio, Newspaper, Television and Internet). In the survey, respondents were asked about their frequency of listening to radio, reading newspaper and watching television. The responses were ‘almost every day, at least once a week, less than once a week or not at all’. They were also asked if they had ever used the internet. The responses to this question was ‘yes and no’. For the purpose of the study and ease of analysis, the responses to the questions on frequency of listening to radio, reading newspaper and watching television were recoded as follows: almost every day, at least once a week, less than once a week = 1 and not at all = 0. The responses to the question on internet use was also coded as yes = 1 and no = 0. Hence, a dichotomous outcome of ‘yes and no’ was created from these four questions. Any respondent who selected at least one ‘yes’ for all the four was considered as exposed to mass media whiles those who selected ‘no’ for all the four questions were considered as not-exposed to mass media [17].
Covariates.
Apart from mass media exposure, eight other covariates were considered in this study. These were age, level of education, place of residence, marital status, region, religion, ethnicity, and parity. The choice of the variables was influenced by their availability in the GMHS dataset and previous studies that found these variables to be important variables influencing self-efficacy in abortion decision-making [9,18]. Three of these variables (religion, ethnicity and parity) were recoded. Religion was recoded as no religion, Christian, Muslim, and Traditionalist. Ethnicity was categorized into Akan, Ga-Dangme, Ewe, Mole-Dagbani and Others. Finally, parity was recoded into zero births, one birth, two births and three or more births.
Statistical analyses
This study employed both descriptive and inferential analytical approaches to analyze data. The descriptive analytical approach involved the use of proportions to illustrate the proportion of adolescent girls and young women who could decide on their own to get an abortion and distribution of self-efficacy in abortion decision-making across the various socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, including mass media exposure. With the inferential analytical approach, a chi-square test (χ2) was first used to cross-tabulate the survey data results and find the association between the independent variables and the dependent variable. Apart from religion and parity, all the independent variables showed statistically significant relationship with the outcome variable and were included in a Binary Logistic Regression model to assess their influence on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. Two regression models were developed. Model I looked at the influence of mass media exposure on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making and Model II looked at the influence of mass media exposure and all the covariates on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. The study employed Binary Logistic Regression because this technique allows extrapolation on a combination of continuous and categorical variables [19]. The data was weighted with the available sample weight factor within the GMHS dataset to subside the effect of sampling bias and ensure generalization [6,20]. STATA version 14.0 was used to do the analyses. The coefficients of the models were exponentiated to derive Crude Odds Ratios (CORs) and Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs). Statistically significant results were assessed at 95% confidence level.
Ethical statement
Since the study involved the participation of human subjects, the ICF Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the protocol for the 2017 GMHS. Nonetheless, since the researchers were not directly involved in the data collection, no ethical clearance was sought for this particular study. However, permission was obtained from ICF Macro for the use of the dataset in this study and the terms of use have been strictly observed.
Results
Self-efficacy in abortion decision-making
Less than a quarter of adolescent girls and young women (24%) in Ghana could decide on their own to get an abortion (Fig 1).
Source: Computed from 2017 GMHS.
Self-efficacy in abortion decision-making across mass media exposure and socio-demographic characteristics
Adolescent girls and young women in Ghana who are able to take decisions on their own to get abortion are mostly those who have media exposure (24.3%), those with tertiary level of education (35.3%), those aged 20–24 (28.6%), those cohabiting (30.6%%), Christians (24.3%), Akans (29.2%), those from the Ashanti Region (39.1%), urban dwellers (25.7%) and those with one birth (27.0%). The results further show that media exposure (χ2 = 19.7, p< 0.001), educational level (χ2 = 49.8, p< 0.001), age (χ2 = 53.2, p< 0.001), marital status (χ2 = 14.7, p< 0.01), ethnicity (χ2 = 70.4, p< 0.001), region (χ2 = 280.4, p< 0.001) and place of residence (χ2 = 18.2, p< 0.001) had statistically significant associations with self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana (Table 1).
Influence of mass media exposure and socio-demographic characteristics on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana
Mass media exposure alone had a statistically significant influence on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana, with adolescent girls and young women who were exposed to mass media more likely to take decisions on their own to get an abortion compared to those who were not exposed to media as shown in Model I [COR = 1.90, CI = 1.43–2.53]. By interacting with the socio-demographic characteristics of adolescent girls and young women, mass media exposure, together with age, marital status, ethnicity and region showed statistically significant influence on self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana (see Model II). With media exposure, adolescent girls and young women who were exposed to media were more likely to take decisions on their own to get an abortion compared to those who were not exposed to media [AOR = 1.55, CI = 1.14–2.11]. With age, adolescent girls and young women aged 20–24 [AOR = 1.45, CI = 1.25–1.68] were more likely to take decisions on their own to get an abortion compared to those aged 15–19. The likelihood of taking decisions on their own to get an abortion was high among adolescent girls and young women who were cohabiting [AOR = 1.40, CI = 1.02–1.93] in terms of marital status. With region, the highest likelihood of self-efficacy in abortion decision making was found among adolescent girls and young women from the Ashanti Region [AOR = 2.39, CI = 1.85–3.07] whiles those from the Eastern Region were less likely to take their own decisions to get an abortion [AOR = 0.52, CI = 0.36–0.73]. Finally, the likelihood of self-efficacy in abortion decision making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana was low among those belonging to the Ga-Adangbe ethnic group [AOR = 0.70, CI = 0.50–0.99] (Table 2).
Discussion
In this study, we used data from the 2017 GMHS to examine the association between mass media exposure and self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana. We hypothesized that adolescent girls and young women who have been exposed to mass media would have high self-efficacy in abortion decision-making compared to those who are not exposed to mass media. The study revealed that only 24% of adolescent girls and young women in Ghana have self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. This is consistent with a previous study that used the same dataset to examine the abortion experiences among women in Ghana [9].
Arguably, mass media has permeated every sphere of life among adolescent girls and young people in this 21st century [21]. This study also showed that adolescent girls and young women who are exposed to mass media are more likely to have self-efficacy to make abortion decisions. This corroborates other studies on the association between mass media exposure and reproductive health decision-making capacities and behaviour in Ghana [9] and other parts of SSA [22]. Specifically, Owoo, Lambon-Quayefio and Onuoha, [9] found that mass media exposure has strong association with abortion self-efficacy among women in their reproductive age. The probable explanation the authors gave to this association was that women who are exposed to mass media are more likely to be exposed to “western ideas and messages that encourage independence and greater autonomy”. In addition to this, the various channels such as the internet that have permeated the life of most young people could be used to find information on the various locations and means by which young people could employ to terminate a pregnancy.
Aside the principal independent variable–mass media exposure, the association of the covariates with the outcome variable are worth discussing. The likelihood of self-efficacy in abortion decision-making was high among adolescent girls and young women who were cohabiting and those aged 20–24. This is consistent with previous studies on the association between age and decision-making on sexual and reproductive health services. For instance, the study by Seidu et al. [23] found that women in advanced ages compared to adolescents were more likely to make decisions in relations to their reproductive health including abortions. There are two principal reasons that may explain this association. First, there are cultural connotations that expect younger people to be obedient and seek advice from the elderly in all situations. In Africa and Ghana in particular, age is very important in decision-making processes in that younger persons are expected to be submissive when it comes to decision making with the older ones [24]. It has also been indicated that being an adolescent woman in sexual unions may result in powerlessness and difficulty in reproductive health decision-making [24,25]. The second pathway may be explained by the legal age that women in Ghana can seek abortion depending on the reasons stipulated in the abortion law of the country. Young people who are not up to 18 years do not have the legal autonomy to seek abortions even if they wish to do so. It is therefore, imperative that for such a vulnerable group not to be misinformed, they need to be empowered with knowledge on the safety of abortion from an early age [26]. In this sense, adolescence would be the ideal time to educate them on abortion related issues [27]. We acknowledge the fact that sexual health is already a vital component in the Ghanaian school curriculum, despite this, there may be cultural and religious barriers in discussing these topics at school.
In this current study, we noted regional disparities in self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana. Specifically, those in the Ashanti Region had the highest likelihood of taking decisions on their own to get an abortion whiles those from the Eastern Region were less likely to have self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. This is consistent with the results obtained by Owoo, Lambon-Quayefio, and Onuoha [9], where women in the Eastern and Ashanti Regions were less and more likely respectively to have self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. This resonates the explanation given by Darteh et al. [24] and GSS et al. [28] that regional differences exist in Ghana by level of education, development and poverty. The Ashanti Region is one of the regions that is well endowed with resources and the level of development compared to other regions is higher. Apart from these differences, there are also enormous cultural differences regarding sexual and reproductive health regionally. All these nuances might explain the disparities in decision-making efficacy on abortion among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana. It is therefore imperative that a qualitative study be carried out to explore the reasons surrounding abortion decision-making process and its self-efficacy. Future studies should also explore the impact of, particularly, the cultural specificity in relation to reproductive health decision making in general. Such studies would clarify our understanding on the phenomenon.
Relatedly, ethnicity was also associated with self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. The likelihood of self-efficacy in abortion decision-making was low among those belonging to the Ga-Adangbe ethnic group and this was different from what was found by Owoo, Lambon-Quayefio, and Onuoha [9]. The possible explanation for the differences in findings could be how ethnicity was grouped in the various studies as well as the differences in sample size and study populations.
Strength and limitations
Whereas the findings from this study provide important considerations for advocacy and policy implications, some important limitations are worth acknowledging. First, the study shares all the weakness inherent in cross-sectional study design. Secondly, there is also the possibility of social desirability responses since the variables in the study were self-reported. Despite these weaknesses, the study has compelling strengths such as the relatively large sample size as well as the nationwide nature of the data which makes the results from the study generalizable to all adolescent girls and young women in Ghana.
Conclusion
W used data from the 2017 GMHS to examine the association between mass media exposure and self-efficacy in abortion decision-making among adolescent girls and young women in Ghana. Only a quarter of adolescent girls and young women in Ghana have self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. After controlling for other covariates, exposure to mass media was strongly associated with self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. In addition, age, marital status, ethnicity and region of residence were associated with self-efficacy in abortion decision-making. It is therefore recommended that to promote safe abortions, these factors should be taken into consideration to provide culturally and age appropriate support systems and education via the various media platforms to help adolescent girls and young women who might desire to have an abortion. Government should also ensure regular, periodic mass media campaigns to target adolescent girls and young women and provide education/knowledge on family planning and safe abortion practices. This could go a long way to ensure that cases of unsafe abortion are reduced to the starkest minimum and will go a long way to help in the reduction in maternal mortality cases.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Measure DHS for providing us with the data upon which the findings of this study were based. We also acknowledge Mr. Ebenezer Agbaglo of the Department of English, University of Cape Coast, who thoroughly copy-edited this manuscript for language usage, spelling and grammar.
References
- 1. Munakampe MN, Zulu JM., & Michelo C. Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes and practices among adolescents from low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC health services research. 2018: 18(1), 909. pmid:30497464
- 2. Yogi A, Prakash KC, & Neupane S. Prevalence and factors associated with abortion and unsafe abortion in Nepal: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018: 18(1), 376. pmid:30223798
- 3. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, & Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet Global Health. 2018: 6(4), e380–e389. pmid:29519649
- 4. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, Johnson BR Jr, Tunçalp Ö, Assifi A, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2372–81.
- 5.
Guttmacher Institute. In Brief: Facts on the Sexual and Reproductive Health of Adolescent Women in the Developing World Context. Available online: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Adolescents-SRH.pdf (accessed on17 January 2020).
- 6. Boah M, Bordotsiah S, Kuurdong S. Predictors of unsafe induced abortion among women in Ghana. Journal of pregnancy. 2019 Feb 3;2019.
- 7. Aniteye P, O’Brien B, Mayhew SH. Stigmatized by association: challenges for abortion service providers in Ghana. BMC health services research. 2016 Dec;16(1):1–0.
- 8. Coast E, Norris AH, Moore AM, & Freeman E. Trajectories of women's abortion-related care: a conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine. 2018: 200, 199–210.
- 9. Owoo NS, Lambon-Quayefio MP, & Onuoha N. Abortion experience and self-efficacy: exploring socioeconomic profiles of GHANAIAN women. Reproductive health. 2019: 16(1), 117. pmid:31349789
- 10.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In Ramachaudran V. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: academic press. 1994.
- 11. Robinson MN, Tansil KA, Elder RW, Soler RE, Labre MP, Mercer SL, et al. Mass media health communication campaigns combined with health-related product distribution: a community guide systematic review. American journal of preventive medicine. 2014 Sep 1;47(3):360–71. pmid:25145620
- 12.
Jenkins H, Ford S, Green J. Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU press; 2018 Apr 3.
- 13. Purcell C, Hilton S, & McDaid . The stigmatisation of abortion: a qualitative analysis of print media in Great Britain in 2010. Culture, health & sexuality. 2014: 16(9), 1141–1155.
- 14. Sisson G, & Kimport K. Depicting abortion access on American television, 2005–2015. Feminism & Psychology. 2017: 27(1), 56–71.
- 15.
Marie Stopes International. My Body, My Voice: Women’s views on abortion care. 2019.
- 16.
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), ICF. Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2017. Accra: GSS, GHS, and ICF. 2018.
- 17. Fatema K, Lariscy JT. Mass media exposure and maternal healthcare utilization in South Asia. SSM-Population Health. 2020 Jun 7:100614.
- 18. Brauer M, van Ditzhuijzen J, Boeije H, & van Nijnatten C. Understanding Decision-Making and Decision Difficulty in Women With an Unintended Pregnancy in the Netherlands. Qualitative health research. 2019: 29(8), 1084–1095. pmid:30574835
- 19. Ranganathan P, Pramesh CS, & Aggarwal R. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: logistic regression. Perspectives in clinical research. 2017: 8(3), 148. pmid:28828311
- 20.
Rutstein SO, Rojas G. Guide to DHS statistics: Demographic and health surveys methodology. Calverton: ORC Macro. 2006
- 21. Appel G, Grewal L, Hadi R, Stephen AT. The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2020 Jan;48(1):79–95. pmid:32431463
- 22. Wusu O. Exposure to media content and sexual health behaviour among adolescents in Lagos metropolis, Nigeria. African journal of reproductive health. 2013: 17(2), 157–168. pmid:24069761
- 23. Seidu AA, Ahinkorah BO, Agbemavi W, Amu H, & Bonsu F. Reproductive health decision-making capacity and pregnancy termination among Ghanaian women: Analysis of the 2014 Ghana demographic and health survey. Journal of Public Health. 2019: 1–10.
- 24. Darteh EKM, Doku DT, & Esia-Donkoh K. Reproductive health decision making among Ghanaian women. Reproductive health. 2014: 11(1), 23.
- 25. Pazvakawambwa L, Indongo N, & Kazembe LN. Explaining marital patterns and trends in Namibia: a regression analysis of 1992, 2000 and 2006 demographic and survey data. PloS one. 2013: 8(8).
- 26. Arambepola C, & Rajapaksa LC. Decision making on unsafe abortions in Sri Lanka: a case-control study. Reproductive health. 2014: 11(1), 91.
- 27. Mitchell EM, Heumann S, Araujo A, Adesse L, & Halpern CT. Brazilian adolescents’ knowledge and beliefs about abortion methods: a school-based internet inquiry. BMC women's health. 2014: 14(1), 27.
- 28.
Ghana Statistical Service, Ghana Health Service, ICF International. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA: GSS, GHS, and ICF International. 2015.