Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptomic signatures of cold adaptation and heat stress in the winter ant (Prenolepis imparis)

  • Maria Adelena Tonione ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    riatoni@berkeley.edu

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America

  • Ke Bi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America, Computational Genomics Resource Laboratory (CGRL), California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America

  • Neil Durie Tsutsui

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America

Abstract

Climate change is a serious threat to biodiversity; it is therefore important to understand how animals will react to this stress. Ectotherms, such as ants, are especially sensitive to the climate as the environmental temperature influences myriad aspects of their biology, from optimal foraging time to developmental rate. In this study, we conducted an RNA-seq analysis to identify stress-induced genes in the winter ant (Prenolepis imparis). We quantified gene expression during heat and cold stress relative to a control temperature. From each of our conditions, we sequenced the transcriptome of three individuals. Our de novo assembly included 13,324 contigs that were annotated against the nr and SwissProt databases. We performed gene ontology and enrichment analyses to gain insight into the physiological processes involved in the stress response. We identified a total of 643 differentially expressed genes across both treatments. Of these, only seven genes were differentially expressed in the cold-stressed ants, which could indicate that the temperature we chose for trials did not induce a strong stress response, perhaps due to the cold adaptations of this species. Conversely, we found a strong response to heat: 426 upregulated genes and 210 downregulated genes. Of these, ten were expressed at a greater than ten-fold change relative to the control. The transcripts we could identify included those encoding for protein folding genes, heat shock proteins, histones, and Ca2+ ion transport. One of these transcripts, hsc70-4L was found to be under positive selection. We also characterized the functional categories of differentially expressed genes. These candidate genes may be functionally conserved and relevant for related species that will deal with rapid climate change.

Introduction

Climate change is among the top drivers of biodiversity loss [1] as species or populations will need to either migrate, face extinction, or adapt to the new thermal conditions via phenotypic plasticity or altered behavior [2,3]. Although adaptation to novel environments occurs over longer time spans, climate change has occurred rapidly, thus species may rely heavily on phenotypic plasticity to persist in their environments [46]. Concerns over possible effects of climate change has led to interest in temperature-protein interactions. Transcriptomics (RNA-seq) has emerged as a hypothesis-generating tool which can provide insights into the pathways and genes associated with adaptation to thermal conditions [79].

Temperature stress causes proteins to misfold, denature, or form aggregates, and this can result in impaired organismal function [10]. In a diverse array of organisms, there is a similar heat shock response (HSR) to combat environmental stress, which typically includes changes in gene expression leading to physiological adjustments [9,11,12]. The HSR involves upregulation of genes that encode for heat shock proteins (Hsps), chaperones or co-chaperones of Hsps, or other genes associated with maintaining proteostasis [e.g. 1316], and the multigene families of Hsp90, Hsp70, and Hsp40 make up the most prolific proteins in the HSR [17,18]. Some studies suggest that upregulation of genes during physiologically stressful times enhances thermotolerance [1923]. Alternatively, this response could be a panic or “emergency response,” as higher levels of Hsps have also been associated with reduced thermotolerance [24]. Other studies have noted no upregulation of Hsps with temperature stress [2527], suggesting an organismal response to heat stress can be more nuanced than simple overall upregulation of Hsps.

Ants occupy diverse thermal environments, across a wide range of latitudes and elevations that encompass many different microclimates and thermal limits. This diversity suggests that adaptation to different temperatures has played an important role in ant evolution [28]. A few previous studies of ants have looked at the role of specific genes in overcoming cold and heat stress. For example, in two of the world’s most thermotolerant ants, Cataglyphis bombycina and C. bicolor, Hsp synthesis begins at lower temperatures and continues during higher temperatures than in the Formica polyctena, an ant that inhabits a more moderate environment. This synthesis of Hsps suggests a preadaptation to high temperatures [29]. Many of these focused studies aim to understand expression of stress proteins of Hsp families in response to cold or hot [e.g. 18, 30]. There are very few studies of ants that have attempted to identify genes and pathways associated with a cold or hot stress response without a priori information. One recent study looked at gene expression in Cataglyphis bombycina during heat stress and documented induction of molecular chaperones [31]. However, we are unaware of studies that have documented genes induced during hot and cold stress in an ant with a preference for cold.

In this study, we use RNA-seq to identify the stress response at the level of gene expression in the winter ant (Prenolepis imparis, Say [32]). Prenolepis imparis is associated with cooler microhabitats in mesic forests from sea level to high-elevation (2,286 meters) throughout the United States and Mexico, and the southern part of Ontario, Canada [3336]. Prenolepis imparis decreases its activity under warm conditions and is most active in the cooler months (late fall through early spring), when nearly all other ant species exhibit reduced foraging [37,38]. A detailed analysis of their nest structure in Florida found that nest chambers were dug 60 cm below ground, at temperatures between 16 and 24°C [39]. A previous study found populations of P. imparis have different levels of plasticity and thermal tolerance [40] which makes this species an interesting candidate to examine the genetic basis of these traits.

The overarching goal of this study was to reveal candidate genes necessary for recovery from temperature stress. To do this, we examined the transcriptomic response to short-term temperature stress in P. imparis. We hypothesized that after three hours at a cold (5°C) or a hot (35°C) temperature, P. imparis will experience physiological stress and, accordingly, will modulate the expression of genes necessary to survive these stressful conditions.

Methods

Sample collection and stress exposure

We collected worker ants from a population on the UC Berkeley campus in Berkeley, California, USA (WGS1984; 122.26317, 37.87281), in June 2014. We chose this site because a previous study showed that P. imparis from this site exhibit phenotypic plasticity in response to both hot and cold temperatures [40]. After the ants were collected, they were immediately placed in one of three separate thermal conditions: (1) an incubator (Fisher Scientific Isotemp Model 650D Large 600 Series Incubator CAT# 11-690-650D) at 35°C (heat stress), (2) on a room-temperature bench-top approximately 21°C, within the temperature range we expect to find their nests (a control), and (3) a walk-in cold room at approximately 5°C (cold stress). In a preliminary experiment, we placed ten individuals at 36°C, ten individuals at approximately 21°C, and ten individuals at approximately 4°C. After three hours at this temperature, 1–2 individuals in the 36°C and 4°C temperatures were dead. However, when ants were exposed to 35°C and 5°C for three hours, there was no mortality. Therefore, we used the latter temperatures as our experimental conditions. All three groups remained in those conditions for a total of three hours and provided water, but no food, to ensure expression was not influenced by dietary changes. During a two-hour recovery phase, the ants were given a 30% sugar water solution. A two-hour recovery was used because previous studies in Drosophila have found that several Hsp genes had a maximum response two hours after the stress [41].

RNA isolation and mRNA sequencing

After the two-hour recovery phase, ten ants from each temperature condition were collected and ground individually in 1 mL TRIzol (Invitrogen) using a disposable pellet mixer and cordless motor (VWR #47747–370) until homogenized (approx. 15 seconds). RNA extraction was performed according to Rio et al. [42], with the following changes: 1) we used 0.1 mL of BCP Phase separation reagent (Molecular Research Center) for every mL of TRIzol and 2) each sample was re-suspended in 28 μL RNAse-free water. Based on Nanodrop concentration estimates, we chose three samples from each treatment that had roughly the same RNA concentration to continue library production; all samples used in library preparation were approximately 35 ng/μL in concentration. The integrity and yield of the RNA extractions were checked by a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Cedar Creek, Texas). All samples had an RNA integrity number (RIN) > 7.0, which indicated quality sufficient for poly(A) selection and cDNA library preparation. Approximately 0.5–2 μg of total RNA was used as the template for cDNA library construction according to manufacturer’s recommendations in the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit v2 (Illumina: RS-122-2001). The RNA was sheared for eight minutes during the poly(A) selection. To increase the heterogeneity of the cDNA libraries, we split the reaction in half and combined them after enriching the samples for ten cycles. Library quality was assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR), the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit on a Qubit fluorometer, and Bioanalyzer 2100. All nine indexed libraries were normalized to 2 nM then pooled in equal volumes and sequenced using one lane of a 150-bp paired-end Illumina HiSeq2500 run (Vincent J. Coates Genomics Sequencing Laboratory, UC Berkeley).

P. imparis de novo transcript assembly and annotation

A total of nine individuals was sequenced and aligned to create a de novo transcriptome. Raw reads were filtered using Cutadapt [43] and Trimmomatic [44] to remove low quality reads and adapter sequences. Exact duplicates were eliminated using Super Deduper [45]. After quality control and adapter trimming, reads from all individuals were merged and grouped into clusters based on shared sequence (‘gene’) using Trinity r2014-07-17 [46] on XSEDE [47]. The resulting de novo assembly served as a reference with only the longest isoform per gene retained. This reference assembly was annotated against 8 different reference protein databases from other ant species: Camponotus floridanus, Cardiocondyla obscurior, Harpegnathos saltator, Linepithema humile, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, Solenopsis invicta, Atta cephalotes, and Acromyrmex echinatior [4853]. The initial round of annotation was done against the NCBI-nonredundant (nr) and SwissProt databases using BLASTX [54] with an e-value threshold of 1e-10 and a minimal percent mismatches of 50. The reading frame of each of the matched BLAST hits was then defined by Exonerate [55]. For each reference-specific annotation, when more than one transcript fragment matched against a reference protein, these transcripts were joined together with Ns based on their relative BLAST hit positions to the reference. The resulting annotation from each species was then merged together to purge redundancies. Namely, when the same transcript was annotated with a protein ID from a different reference, only one of the protein IDs was kept. The IDs found here were used in the following gene ontology and functional analyses. All scripts used for cleaning, assembly, and annotation are available on the Computational Genomics Resource Laboratory (CGRL)-QB3 UC Berkeley Github site [56].

Differential gene expression analysis

We used the quasi-mapping approach implemented in the program Salmon [57]. In this case, the cleaned and trimmed individual reads were quasi-mapped to the merged reference assemblies. To filter out genes that were not expressed or genes with low expression, only genes with a TPM value of ≥ 1 in all the samples were considered. Transcript-level abundance estimates were collapsed to gene-level estimates using tximport [58]. Count data were normalized using DESeq2 1.18.1 [59]. The normalized counts were then used by DESeq2 to calculate and plot PCA. We then ran two tests with these normalized data: (1) heat stressed ants (35°C) versus control ants (21°C) and (2) cold stressed ants (5°C) versus control ants (21°C). Transcripts were considered to be differentially expressed (DE) if i) the Benjamini and Hochberg adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) p-value was less than 0.01, ii) the absolute value of the fold-change (FC) ≥ 2.0, and iii) the relative standard deviation (RSD) of expression between replicates was less than 0.4 [31].

Gene ontology and functional annotation

In order to understand the molecular processes relating to temperature-stress, we investigated the functions of genes using the Gene Ontology (GO) database [60,61] and annotated gene metabolic and cellular functions using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG [62]) pathway maps. To do this, we blasted the DE heat and cold induced transcripts from the DE analysis against the entire NCBI-nr database (e-value < 1e-5) and the UniProt [63] annotated protein database. Using the resulting GO annotations, we used WEGO software [64] to functionally classify the terms. The transcripts were also annotated for biochemical pathways [62] using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS) for ortholog assignment and pathway mapping [65] and visualized using iPath3 [66].

Detection of selection

We tested for selection in the ten most differentially expressed DETs (all upregulated) from the heat stress trials [31] and the four up-regulated DETs detected after the cold stress. Using the coding sequence (CDS) of these DETs, we identified orthologous genes available for other ant species [4853,6769] and conducted a selection test using the branch-specific models [70,71] in codeml (packaged in paml version 4.8; [72,73]) as implemented by EasyCodeML [74]. This test is able to detect negative and positive selection by identifying the relative number of non-synonymous and synonymous mutations (ω = dN/dS) relative to expectations under neutral evolution [75]. When at least four ant sequences were available, we were able to conduct a likelihood ratio test using codeml [74]. We compared two a priori assumptions: first that a given gene has been evolving at the same rate across all species (the one-ratio model, M0; NSites = 0, model = 0) and second, that a gene is under selection in P. imparis relative to others (the two-ratio model, BM; NSites = 0, model = 2). We calculated dN/dS for the P. imparis branch under the two-ratio model. We included a simplified tree (runmode = 0) from Moreau [76] with only the species for which sequences were included in the analysis. We used twice the difference of the likelihood values calculated under both scenarios to test which model best fit the data and calculated significance using a χ2 distribution (df = 1).

Results

In this study, we generated nine P. imparis transcriptome libraries to identify differentially expressed genes during temperature stress. From the nine libraries, the Hi-Seq 2500 run produced a total of 296 million reads of 150bp in length. The total sequence ranged from 29.92 Mb to 37.70 Mb, across the libraries, with means of 32.08 Mb, 33.85 Mb, and 32.75 Mb for the 5°C, 21°C, and 35°C treated ants, respectively. There were no significant differences in the number of sequences between the three datasets (AMOVA, p = 0.83). After trimming, we obtained a total of 31.25 Gb of cleaned sequences for further downstream analyses (S1 Table).

Gene identification and annotation

We performed BLASTX to annotate the transcriptome assembly and inform downstream differential gene expression analysis. After BLASTX annotation, a total of 13,324 contigs had a significant BLAST hit to a gene from one of the previously annotated eight unique ant genomes with an e-value cutoff of 10e-5. Altogether, 12,007 contigs (90%) received annotations. Of these, 7,011 contigs (58%) were assigned GO annotations, and 6,122 (51%) were assigned KEGG annotations. Because of the lack of genome information for P. imparis, only about half of the contigs with hits from the ant genomes were annotated for genes, GO terms, and KEGG numbers (5,991).

Differential gene expression

A total of 8,818 transcripts was tested for differential expression after filtering for low TPM values and collapsing duplicates. Our analysis indicated that 636 transcripts showed DE in response to the heat treatment. Of these, 426 were upregulated, and 210 were downregulated, ten of these transcripts had had a strong increase in expression (≥10 fold-change; FC; Table 1), 426 were upregulated (S2 Table), and 210 were downregulated (S3 Table). In contrast, only seven transcripts differed in expression for cold-stressed ants relative to controls, none of which exceeded 6X FC (Table 2). To summarize our data, we performed hierarchical clustering across all transcripts. The resulting tree clustered the cold-stressed and control ants together, while the heat stressed ants were in their own cluster (Fig 1). PCA analysis on the 8,818 transcripts revealed that most of the variation (60%) was between the heat stressed individuals and the cold stressed and control ants (S1 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Hierarchical clustering and heatmap of all normalized transcripts.

Individual clustering is based on the distance matrix of the similarities between samples. Colors indicate magnitude of change of expression indicated by the z-score calculated from individual transcript levels per gene. Upregulation of a gene is indicated in green, and downregulation is indicated in orange. Individuals are listed at the bottom of the heat map and color coded to indicate their treatment: red = heat-stressed, blue = cold-stressed, black = control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Proteins that were strongly upregulated after heat stress in P. imparis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Proteins that have been differentially expressed after cold stress in P. imparis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.t002

Gene ontology and functional annotation

All transcripts were assigned GO or KEGG numbers based on sequence homology. For the heat induced transcripts, 325 (51%) of the 636 DETs could be assigned GO numbers. GO functional classification of these DETs revealed that 199 (47%) of the 426 upregulated DETs could be categorized into 48 functional groups (Fig 2). Across all the GO domains, we found a high percentage of genes in cell, organelle, cell part, binding, cellular process, biological regulation, and metabolic process. The functional classification of the downregulated DETs resulted in 124 (59%) of the 210 DETs categorized into 46 functional groups. Across all the GO domains, we found a high percentage of genes in cell part, cell, membrane, binding, metabolic process, single-organism, and cellular process. Compared to the downregulated genes, we saw significantly increased expression in the upregulated genes in four functional groups (organelle, macromolecular complex, cellular component organization or biological process, and positive regulation of biological process; Fig 2), while we saw decreased expression in nine functions in the downregulated DETs relative to the upregulated DETs (membrane, membrane part, extracellular region, catalytic activity, transporter activity, molecular transducer activity, signal transducer activity, single-organisms process, and localization; Fig 2). These results indicate that multiple biological processes are necessary for a heat response.

thumbnail
Fig 2. GO functional classification of heat induced DETs.

The DETs were placed into three main GO categories: cellular component, molecular function, biological process. Asterisks indicate significant difference (* indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.g002

For the cold-induced transcripts, five (71%) of the seven DETs could be assigned GO numbers. GO functional classification of the upregulated DETs revealed that three (75%) of four could be categorized into six functional groups as shown in Fig 3. While GO functional classification of the downregulated DETs revealed that two (67%) of the three DETs could be classified into 17 functional groups (Fig 3). Due to the low number of cold-induced DETs, we did not have enough power to statistically compare the relative numbers of transcripts in each category.

thumbnail
Fig 3. GO functional classification of cold induced DETs.

The DETs were placed into three main GO categories: cellular component, molecular function, biological process.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.g003

To further evaluate functional pathways associated heat stress or cold stress, we annotated the 643 DETs with KEGG numbers using KASS. KASS identified 132 upregulated and 71 downregulated DETs after heat stress. Using KEGG Pathway Mapper, for the upregulated and downregulated DETs, we found the main pathway involved was metabolic pathways (upregulated; 14, downregulated; 11; S2 Fig). Only one DET was annotated from the cold stress trial: transcription termination factor 2, which mapped to thyroid hormone synthesis (S3 Fig).

Detection of selection

We were able to test for selection (dN/dS ratios) in five of the ten most heat induced transcripts and in two of the four cold induced transcripts. For the transcripts that could be tested, a signal of positive selection was detected for the CDS of the heat shock protein, Hsc70-4L (dN/dS ratio 9.5 times larger leading to the P. imparis branch; Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Likelihood ratio test evaluating signals of positive selection along the Prenolepis branch.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.t003

Discussion

In this study, we examined the gene expression and associated pathways used by the winter ant (Prenolepis imparis) following heat or cold stress. We found that cold stress produced virtually no changes compared to room temperature controls, indicating that this temperature was not extreme enough to produce a strong physiological response, likely due to the preference of this species for cooler temperatures, which is well-documented [3335,77]. In contrast to the cold-stress treatment, the heat-stress treatment resulted in altered expression of 636 transcripts, and some of these transcripts displayed enormous changes in the magnitude of expression. The vast majority of the differentially expressed genes found here displayed upregulation rather than downregulation, consistent with heat stress triggering an active genetic response rather than a silencing of baseline gene expression. Many of these genes have been implicated in thermal stress response in other species (see below) and are thus likely involved in the physiological response of P. imparis to heat.

Response to heat stress

Because of the stress that heat puts on proteins, it is not surprising that we see the enrichment of gene functional categories for response to temperature and protein folding. All organisms have Hsp genes and while the relative amounts of Hsps vary between organisms they are among the first lines of defense preventing irreversible denaturation of proteins [13]. In this study, we found the highest levels of expression changes in the gene lethal(2)essential for life-like (l(2)efl), which encodes a small heat shock protein (sHsp). Previous studies have found this gene upregulated in response to both heat [16,31,78] and crowding [14] and downregulated during pathogen stress [79]. In our study, expression levels of this gene were 165-fold higher in the high temperature treated ants relative to the control. In ants, this gene was previously found to be strongly heat inducible in the Sahara-dwelling ant, Cataglyphis bombycina [31], but interestingly, not heat inducible in Aphaenogaster picea (from more temperate eastern North America) and Pogonomyrmex barbatus (from the desert southwest of the United States [18]). Based on the high levels of l(2)elf we detected during heat stress, it appears to be one of the most important genes in recovering from this stress.

There was also upregulation in other Hsps. We detected Heat shock 70 kDa protein cognate 4L (Hsc70-4L) 23X higher during heat stress. Hsc70-4 has been implicated in heat stress response [11,16,24,31,78,8083] and cold stress response [81,82,84] in many other organisms. Previous studies have shown that ants have divergent copies of Hsc70-4 that are under positive selection and in C. bombycina, the Hsp70 protein family was highly induced during heat stress [31]. We also detected a 10X FC increase in aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), a gene which codes for a protein that forms a complex with Hsp90 [85,86], a 7X FC increase in Hsp70-4L, a 4X FC increase in Hsp90, and a 3X FC increase in Hsp60.

Bcl-2-associated athanogene (BAG)-family proteins are a multifunctional group that contribute to a range of physiological processes, including the cell cycle, apoptosis, and stress response [87,88]. In this study, we found substantially elevated levels Samui, a gene in the BAG-family, under heat stress. This is not surprising given that the protein Samui is known to interact with Hsp70 to regulate its activity [14,87], and has been shown to increase during heat stress in the damselfly, Ischnura elegans [16]. Other studies have found a homologous gene, Starvin (Stv) associated with both heat stress and cold stress, muscle maintenance, and food uptake [16,8993]. Samui was the only BAG-family member found to be upregulated in our study.

In addition to reduced fitness and impaired function caused by damaged protein structure or protein aggregates, heat stress can also cause oxidative stress at the cellular level, creating transcription errors [94,95]. Histones are crucial in conferring resistance to this DNA damage [9698]. In our study, we saw greater than a 10-fold increase of expression levels of the gene that encodes for Histone H2A indicating that these proteins are integral to the stress response in P. imparis. Interestingly, increased expression in Histone H2A during heat stress has been found in Leishmania parasites as well [99].

In response to heat, we also noted a large expression difference in a transcript relating to calcium ion transport, Calcium-transporting ATPase type 2C member 1 (ATPC21).

Calcium signaling has been suggested as a rapid response to low temperatures: calcium signals begin the temperature-hardening pathways, which induces a number of physiological changes necessary to enhance cold tolerance [100]. Genes relating to maintenance of calcium ion homeostasis have been shown to increase in response to heat stress [26,31]. Truebano et al. [101] found that genes involved in Ca2+ signaling were increased in the Antarctic bivalve (Laternula elliptica) during cold stress, indicating the calcium ions could be biomarkers of the physiological state of the individuals during heat stress as well as cold stress. The high levels of ATPC21 that we observed in the heat-stressed ants suggest that it might play a key role in initiating the physiological response to heat and inducing a heat hardening pathway.

Finally, among the top upregulated genes, we found four transcripts that were either uncharacterized or hypothetical. Additional work is needed to understand the function of the unknown proteins found here and, in particular, why they are recovered with such large expression differences in the heat stressed individuals.

For the five heat-induced genes that we were able to test for signals of selection, only Hsc70-4L harbored signals of positive selection along the Prenolepis lineage. A previous study showed that the thermotolerant Cataglyphis lineage was also characterized by heat induction of several HSPs and signals of positive selection on Hsc70-4 h2 and Hsc70-5 relative to other ant lineages [31].

The biological processes increased during recovery to heat stress (“organelle”, “macromolecular complex”, “cellular component organization or biogenesis” and “positive regulation of biological process”) may indicate the heat-stressed individuals expend energy in cellular repair and protein modification post stress. This is expected given that the heat stress will cause damage to proteins within the cells. In response to the heat, many biological processes were decreased during the recovery time. It is counterintuitive that these processes relate to the cellular membrane, outside the cellular membrane, and cellular transportation; it is expected these cellular components are vulnerable to thermal damage and therefore we would expect increased activity in these areas [102]. However, heat temporarily decreases membrane fluidity, and influence lipid-protein interactions [103] and perhaps they have not had time to adequately recover from the negative consequences of heat stress.

Response to cold stress

Similar to heat stress, cold stress can also cause denatured or misfolded proteins, leading to harmful aggregates and impaired function. Cold stress may also cause ion imbalance, impairment of cellular metabolism, depletion of cellular ATP, and buildup of toxic metabolic end products [100]. Therefore, we expected transcripts relating to these processes to be over-expressed in cold-stressed individuals. Our results, however, showed few differences between cold-stressed and control individuals, as depicted by the PCA (S1 Fig), heatmap (Fig 1), and DETs (Table 2). This could indicate that our experimental temperature was not low enough to elicit a strong physiological response or that the cold adaptations of P. imparis are not manifested through the ability to dramatically upregulate genes that help them resist cold. Instead, they may have constitutive mechanisms that allow them to shrug off cold temperature without having to upregulate or downregulate many genes. This is an interesting contrast to the heat-adapted Cataglyphis, which showed numerous upregulated and downregulated genes in order to resist the heat [31]. Both the PCA and heatmap show the cold-stressed individuals and control clustering together or within the same group. Additionally, we only found seven DETs with minor expression changes. Transcripts with increased expression that we were able to identify were: Chitinase 3-like, Laccase-4-like isoform X1, and Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon 17.6.

Chitinase enzymes are involved in the biological function of chitin degradation [104]. They are necessary for a wide range of physiological functions such as immunity, digestion, and phagosytosis [105107]. Chitinase related genes have been induced during cold stress in beetles [108], and there is evidence of positive selection in chitinase genes in high-altitude Lepidoptera in the genus Gynaephora [109]. Together with these studies, the increased expression that we detected in Chitinase 3-like indicate that chitinase enzymes are likely important during cold thermal stress.

The peritrophic matrix (PM) is a lining found in the midgut of insects. This semi-permeable layer forms a protective barrier that prevents invasion by pathogens as well as maintaining gut homeostasis and gut integrity [110,111]. Within the midgut PM, Lang et al. [112] detected laccases and linked them to oxidation of toxic materials in preparation for excretion. In this study, we detected increased expression in Laccase-4-like isoform X1 indicating gut osmoregulation as a cold stress response. Interestingly, proteins necessary for gut osmoregulation have been implicated in other stress responses including cold and hot stress, as shown by increased expression in the mucin gene in damselfly and Frost gene in Drosophila [16,91,113], indicating that gut homeostasis could be integral to stress survival.

We found Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon 17.6 differentially expressed in this study. This is not surprising given that other studies have detected genes involved in retrotransposon activity and other transposable elements (TEs) upregulated in response to heat [16,114116]. In addition, retrotransposon genes have been found to be under selection in urban populations of the black ant, Lasius niger [117], perhaps assisting in adaptation [114] to the warmer conditions experienced by urban populations [118].

Conclusions

The molecular mechanisms behind recovery from temperature stress are complex. In this study, we looked at gene expression levels over the entire ant body at one time-point. Other studies have noted that different organs have different expression patterns [119,120], which can even vary over different time-points [27,41] and development stages [120]. Therefore, a productive next step would be to investigate the responses of these genes and others at multiple time points, either by RNA-seq or a quantification method such as qPCR.

Our analysis has revealed a clear pattern of transcriptome change in response to heat stress and identified a number of candidate loci that may be directly involved in resisting thermal stress. A productive next step would be to directly test the functionality of these genes using methods such as RNA interference (RNAi) to suppress the expression and compare the resulting phenotype with the unmanipulated phenotype [22,121]. It is unclear from our study if these expression changes are an adaptive response or the large transcriptomic response is actually a signal of more stress [9,122,123]. Future studies should focus on a functional link between the candidate genes proposed here and thermal tolerance.

Our transcriptomic analysis provides an investigation of the gene expression profiles involved in recovery from heat and cold in P. imparis. The DETs and pathways identified here could further facilitate investigations into the detailed molecular mechanisms and provide a foundation for future studies of response to temperature stress in P. imparis or a related species with conserved genes.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all annotated transcripts used in differential expression analysis for P. imparis.

Expression levels were checked in nine individual ants two hours post a three-hour temperature treatment. Each point represents one individual; transcripts from ants that were subject to the 5°C treatment are shown as blue squares, transcripts from ants that were subject to the 21°C control are shown as white circles, and finally those transcripts from ants that were subject to the 35°C treatment are shown as red triangles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.s001

(EPS)

S2 Fig. KEGG pathways with KEGG IDs upregulated during heat stress.

The pathways are highlighted in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.s002

(EPS)

S3 Fig. KEGG pathways with KEGG IDs downregulated during heat stress.

The pathways are highlighted in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.s003

(EPS)

S1 Table. Reads obtained for each P. imparis transcriptome sequenced, before and after trimming.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Differentially expressed genes after heat stress in Prenolepis imparis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.s005

(CSV)

S3 Table. Differentially expressed genes after cold stress in Prenolepis imparis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239558.s006

(CSV)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Lydia Smith for troubleshooting in the lab and helpful suggestions, Pierre De Wit for troubleshooting scripts, Quentin Willot and Patrick Mardulyn for assistance with selection analyses, and Minyong Chung at the Vincent J. Coates Genomic Sequencing Laboratory at UC Berkeley.

References

  1. 1. Sala OE, Chapin S, Armesto J, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 2000;287: 1770–1774. pmid:10710299
  2. 2. Chevin LM, Lande R, Mace GM. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biology. 2010;8: e1000357. pmid:20463950
  3. 3. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR. Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology. 2005;86: 1704–1714.
  4. 4. Corl A, Bi K, Luke C, Challa AS, Stern AJ, Sinervo B, et al. The Genetic Basis of Adaptation following Plastic Changes in Coloration in a Novel Environment. Current Biology. 2018;28: 2970–2977. pmid:30197088
  5. 5. Levis NA, Pfennig DW. Evaluating ‘Plasticity-First ‘ Evolution in Nature: Key Criteria and Empirical Approaches. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;31: 563–574. pmid:27067134
  6. 6. Charmantier A, McCleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LEB, Sheldon BC. Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Climate Change in a Wild Bird Population. Science. 2008;320: 800–804. pmid:18467590
  7. 7. Kenkel CD, Meyer E, Matz M V. Gene expression under chronic heat stress in populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different thermal environments. Molecular Ecology. 2013;22: 4322–4334. pmid:23899402
  8. 8. Kenkel CD, Matz M V. Gene expression plasticity as a mechanism of coral adaptation to a variable environment. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2016;1: 0014. pmid:28812568
  9. 9. DeBiasse MB, Kelly MW. Plastic and evolved responses to global change: What can we learn from comparative transcriptomics? Journal of Heredity. 2016;107: 71–81. pmid:26519514
  10. 10. Hofmann GE, Somero GN. Evidence for protein damage at environmental temperatures: seasonal changes in levels of ubiquitin conjugates and hsp70 in the intertidal mussel Mytilus trossulus. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1995;198: 1509–18. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9319406 pmid:9319406
  11. 11. Gleason LU, Burton RS. RNA-seq reveals regional differences in transcriptome response to heat stress in the marine snail Chlorostoma funebralis. Molecular Ecology. 2015;24: 610–627. pmid:25524431
  12. 12. Lockwood BL, Sanders JG, Somero GN. Transcriptomic responses to heat stress in invasive and native blue mussels (genus Mytilus): molecular correlates of invasive success. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2010;213: 3548–3558. pmid:20889835
  13. 13. Feder ME, Hofman GE. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annual Review of Physiology. 1999;61: 243–282. pmid:10099689
  14. 14. King AM, MacRae TH. Insect heat shock proteins during stress and diapause. Annual Review of Entomology. 2015;60: 59–75. pmid:25341107
  15. 15. Kurzik-Dumke U, Lohmann E. Sequence of the new Drosophila melanogaster small heat-shock-related gene, lethal (2) essential for life [l(2)efl], at locus 59F4,5. Gene. 1995;154: 171–175. pmid:7890160
  16. 16. Lancaster LT, Dudaniec RY, Chauhan P, Wellenreuther M, Svensson EI, Hansson B. Gene expression under thermal stress varies across a geographic range expansion front. Molecular Ecology. 2016;25: 1141–1156. pmid:26821170
  17. 17. Fink AL. Chaperone-Mediated Protein Folding. Physiological Reviews. 1999;79: 425–449. pmid:10221986
  18. 18. Nguyen AD, Gotelli NJ, Cahan SH. The evolution of heat shock protein sequences, cis-regulatory elements, and expression profiles in the eusocial Hymenoptera. BMC Evolutionary Biology. BMC Evolutionary Biology; 2016;16: 1–13.
  19. 19. Kalosaka K, Soumaka E, Politis N, Mintzas AC. Thermotolerance and HSP70 expression in the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2009;55: 568–573. pmid:19418596
  20. 20. Feder ME, Cartaño N V, Milos L, Krebs R a, Lindquist SL. Effect of engineering Hsp70 copy number on Hsp70 expression and tolerance of ecologically relevant heat shock in larvae and pupae of Drosophila melanogaster. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1996;199: 1837–1844. pmid:8708583
  21. 21. Gong WJ, Golic KG. Loss of Hsp70 in Drosophila is pleiotropic, with effects on thermotolerance, recovery from heat shock and neurodegeneration. Genetics. 2006;172: 275–286. pmid:16204210
  22. 22. Barreto FS, Schoville SD, Burton RS. Reverse genetics in the tide pool: Knock-down of target gene expression via RNA interference in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015;15: 868–879. pmid:25487181
  23. 23. Schoville SD, Barreto FS, Moy GW, Wolff A, Burton RS. Investigating the molecular basis of local adaptation to thermal stress: population differences in gene expression across the transcriptome of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2012;12: 170. pmid:22950661
  24. 24. Sørensen JG, Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V. Genetic variation in thermal tolerance among natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii: down regulation of Hsp70 expression and variation in heat stress resistance traits. Functional Ecology. 2001;15: 289–296.
  25. 25. Franssen SU, Gu J, Winters G, Huylmans AK, Wienpahl I, Sparwel M, et al. Genome-wide transcriptomic responses of the seagrasses Zostera marina and Nanozostera noltii under a simulated heatwave confirm functional types. Marine Genomics. Elsevier B.V.; 2014;15: 65–73. pmid:24703884
  26. 26. Barshis DJ, Ladner JT, Oliver TA, Seneca FO, Traylor-Knowles N, Palumbi SR. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110: 1387–1392. pmid:23297204
  27. 27. Buckley BA, Somero GN. cDNA microarray analysis reveals the capacity of the cold-adapted Antarctic fish Trematomus bernacchii to alter gene expression in response to heat stress. Polar Biology. 2009;32: 403–415.
  28. 28. Kaspari M, Clay NA, Lucas J, Yanoviak SP, Kay A. Thermal adaptation generates a diversity of thermal limits in a rainforest ant community. Global Change Biology. 2015;21: 1092–1102. pmid:25242246
  29. 29. Gehring WJ, Wehner R. Heat shock protein synthesis and thermotolerance in Cataglyphis, an ant from the Sahara desert. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995;92: 2994–2998. pmid:7708762
  30. 30. Maisov A V., Podlipaeva YI, Kipyatkov VE. Expression of stress proteins of HSP70 family in response to cold in Myrmica ants from various geographic populations. Cell and Tissue Biology. 2007;1: 434–438.
  31. 31. Willot Q, Mardulyn P, Defrance M, Gueydan C, Aron S. Molecular chaperoning helps safeguarding mitochondrial integrity and motor functions in the Sahara silver ant Cataglyphis bombycina. Scientific Reports. Springer US; 2018;8: 1–8. pmid:29907755
  32. 32. Say T. Descriptions of new species of North American Hymenoptera, and observations on some already described. Boston Journal of Natural History. 1836;1: 209–305.
  33. 33. Wheeler WM. The ant Prenolepis imparis Say. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1930;13.
  34. 34. Frye JA, Frye CT. Association of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on oaks and pines in inland dune and ridge woodlands in Worchester County, Maryland. 2012;5: 41–48.
  35. 35. Cuautle M, Vergara CH, Badano EI. Comparison of Ant Community Diversity and Functional Group Composition Associated to Land Use Change in a Seasonally Dry Oak Forest. Neotropical Entomology. 2016;45: 170–179. pmid:26696090
  36. 36. AntWeb. Version 8.28.4. In: California Academy of Science [Internet]. [cited 20 Feb 2020]. https://www.antweb.org
  37. 37. Dunn RR, Parker CR, Sanders NJ. Temporal patterns of diversity: assessing the biotic and abiotic controls on ant assemblages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2007;91: 191–201.
  38. 38. Stuble KL, Pelini SL, Diamond SE, Fowler DA, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ. Foraging by forest ants under experimental climatic warming: A test at two sites. Ecology and Evolution. 2013;3: 482–491. pmid:23531642
  39. 39. Tschinkel WR. Seasonal life history and nest architecture of a winter-active ant, Prenolepis imparis. Insectes Sociaux. 1987;34: 143–164.
  40. 40. Tonione MA, Cho SM, Richmond G, Irian C. Intraspecific variation in thermal acclimation and tolerance between populations of the winter ant, Prenolepis imparis. Ecology and Evolution. 2020; pmid:32551058
  41. 41. Colinet H, Lee SF, Hoffmann A. Temporal expression of heat shock genes during cold stress and recovery from chill coma in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Journal. 2010;277: 174–185. pmid:19968716
  42. 42. Rio DC, Ares M, Hannon GJ, Nilsen TW. Purification of RNA using TRIzol (TRI reagent). Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2010;2010. pmid:20516177
  43. 43. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal. 2011;17: 10.
  44. 44. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. In: Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2014. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
  45. 45. Petersen KR, Streett DA, Gerritsen AT, Hunter SS, Settles ML. Super deduper, fast PCR duplicate detection in fastq files. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2015.
  46. 46. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology. 2011;29: 644–52.
  47. 47. Couger MB, Pipes L, Squina F, Prade R, Siepel A, Palermo R, et al. Enabling large-scale next-generation sequence assembly with Blacklight. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and experience. 2014;26: 2157–2166. pmid:25294974
  48. 48. Elsik CG, Tayal A, Diesh CM, Unni DR, Emery ML, Nguyen HN, et al. Hymenoptera Genome Database: Integrating genome annotations in HymenopteraMine. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44: D793–D800. pmid:26578564
  49. 49. Bonasio R, Zhang G, Ye C, Mutti NS, Fang X, Qin N, et al. Genomic Comparison of the Ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator. Science. 2010;329: 1068–1071. pmid:20798317
  50. 50. Smith CR, Smith CD, Robertson HM, Helmkampf M, Zimin A, Yandell M, et al. Draft genome of the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108: 5667–5672. pmid:21282651
  51. 51. Smith CD, Zimin A, Holt C, Abouheif E, Benton R, Cash E, et al. Draft genome of the globally widespread and invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108: 5673–5678. pmid:21282631
  52. 52. Wurm Y, Wang J, Riba-Grognuz O, Corona M, Nygaard S, Hunt BG, et al. The genome of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108: 5679–5684. pmid:21282665
  53. 53. Suen G, Teiling C, Li L, Holt C, Abouheif E, Bornberg-Bauer E, et al. The genome sequence of the leaf-cutter ant Atta cephalotes reveals insights into its obligate symbiotic lifestyle. PLoS Genetics. 2011;7: e1002007. pmid:21347285
  54. 54. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25: 3389–3402. pmid:9254694
  55. 55. Slater GSC, Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6.
  56. 56. Vincent J. Coates Genomics Sequencing Laboratory and Functional Genomics Laboratory G. DenovoTranscriptome. In: GitHub repository [Internet]. 2016 [cited 4 Aug 2018]. https://github.com/CGRL-QB3-UCBerkeley/DenovoTranscriptome
  57. 57. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nature Methods. 2017;14: 417–419. pmid:28263959
  58. 58. Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research. 2016;4: 1521. pmid:26925227
  59. 59. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15: 550. pmid:25516281
  60. 60. The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Research. Oxford University Press; 2019;47: D330–D338. pmid:30395331
  61. 61. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics. 2000;25: 25–29. pmid:10802651
  62. 62. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopdia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000;28: 27–30. pmid:10592173
  63. 63. Consortium UniProt. UniProt: A hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43: D204–D212. pmid:25348405
  64. 64. Ye J, Zhang Y, Cui H, Liu J, Wu Y, Cheng Y, et al. WEGO 2.0: A web tool for analyzing and plotting GO annotations, 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Research. Oxford University Press; 2018;46: W71–W75. pmid:29788377
  65. 65. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: An automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35: 182–185. pmid:17526522
  66. 66. Letunic I, Yamada T, Kanehisa M, Bork P. iPath: interactive exploration of biochemical pathways and networks. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2008;33: 101–103. pmid:18276143
  67. 67. Wurm Y, Uva P, Ricci F, Wang J, Jemielity S, Iseli C, et al. Fourmidable: A database for ant genomics. BMC Genomics. 2009;10: 5. pmid:19126223
  68. 68. Nygaard S, Zhang G, Schiøtt M, Li C, Wurm Y, Hu H, et al. The genome of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior suggests key adaptations to advanced social life and fungus farming. Genome Research. 2011;21: 1339–1348. pmid:21719571
  69. 69. Dhaygude K, Nair A, Johansson H, Wurm Y, Sundström L. The first draft genomes of the ant Formica exsecta, and its Wolbachia endosymbiont reveal extensive gene transfer from endosymbiont to host. BMC Genomics. 2019;20: 301. pmid:30991952
  70. 70. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1998;46: 409–418. pmid:9541535
  71. 71. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2002;19: 908–917. pmid:12032247
  72. 72. Yang Z. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Computer Applications in the Biosciences. 1997;13: 555–556. pmid:9367129
  73. 73. Yang Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24: 1586–1591. pmid:17483113
  74. 74. Gao F, Chen C, Arab DA, Du Z, He Y, Ho SYW. EasyCodeML: A visual tool for analysis of selection using CodeML. Ecology and Evolution. 2019;9: 3891–3898. pmid:31015974
  75. 75. Nielsen R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual review of genetics. 2005;39: 197–218. pmid:16285858
  76. 76. Moreau CS, Bell CD. Testing The Museum Versus Cradle Tropical Biological Diversity Hypothesis: Phylogeny, Diversification, And Ancestral Biogeographic Range Evolution Of The Ants. Evolution. 2013;67: 2240–2257. pmid:23888848
  77. 77. Talbot M. Response of the ant Prenolepis imparis Say to temperature and humidity changes. Ecology. 1943;24: 345–352.
  78. 78. Borchel A, Kmoisarczuk AZ, Rebl A, Goldammer T, Nilsen F. Systematic identification and characterization of stress-inducible heat shock proteins (HSPs) in the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis). Cell Stress & Chaperones. Cell Stress and Chaperones; 2018;23: 127–139. pmid:28695332
  79. 79. Guo R, Wang S, Xue R, Cao G, Hu X, Huang M, et al. The gene expression profile of resistant and susceptible Bombyx mori strains reveals cypovirus-associated variations in host gene transcript levels. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;99: 5175–5187. pmid:25957492
  80. 80. Nguyen AD, DeNovellis K, Resendez S, Pustilnik JD, Gotelli NJ, Parker JD, et al. Effects of desiccation and starvation on thermal tolerance and the heat-shock response in forest ants. Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology. 2017;187: 1107–1116. pmid:28439669
  81. 81. Rinehart JP, Li A, Yocum GD, Robich RM, Hayward SAL, Denlinger DL. Up-regulation of heat shock proteins is essential for cold survival during insect diapause. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104: 11130–11137. pmid:17522254
  82. 82. Pan D, Cao S, Hang S, Du Y. Genes encoding heat shock proteins in the endoparasitoid wasp, Cotesia chilonis, and their expression in response to temperatures. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2017;16: 60345–60347.
  83. 83. Cui J, Zhu S, Gao Y, Bi R, Xu Z, Shi S. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Megacopta cribraria (Hemiptera: Plataspidae) in Response to High-Temperature Stress. Molecular Entomology. 2019;112: 407–415. pmid:30351361
  84. 84. Sørensen JG, Loeschcke V. Larval crowding in Drosophila melanogaster induces Hsp70 expression, and leads to increased adult longevity and adult thermal stress resistance. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2001;47: 1301–1307. pmid:12770182
  85. 85. Perdew GH, Bradfield CA. Mapping the 90 kDa heat shock protein binding region of the Ah receptor. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International. 1996;39: 589–593. pmid:8828811
  86. 86. Peng T, Chen X, Pan Y, Zheng Z, Wei X, Xi J, et al. Transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor/aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator is involved in regulation of the xenobiotic tolerance-related cytochrome P450 CYP6DA2 in Aphis gossypii Glover. Insect Molecular Biology. 2017;26: 485–495. pmid:28463435
  87. 87. Doong H, Vrailas A, Kohn EC. What’s in the ‘BAG’?–a functional domain analysis of the BAG-family proteins. Cancer letters. 2002;188: 25–32. pmid:12406544
  88. 88. Kabbage M, Dickman MB. The BAG proteins: A ubiquitous family of chaperone regulators. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008;65: 1390–1402. pmid:18264803
  89. 89. Arndt V, Dick N, Tawo R, Dreiseidler M, Wenzel D, Hesse M, et al. Chaperone-Assisted Selective Autophagy Is Essential for Muscle Maintenance. Current Biology. 2010;20: 143–148. pmid:20060297
  90. 90. Coulson M, Robert S, Saint R. Drosophila starvin encodes a tissue-specific BAG-domain protein required for larval food uptake. Genetics. 2005;171: 1799–1812. pmid:16143622
  91. 91. Colinet H, Hoffmann A. Gene and protein expression of Drosophila Starvin during cold stress and recovery from chill coma. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;40: 425–428. pmid:20303406
  92. 92. Telonis-Scott M, Clemson AS, Johnson TK, Sgrò CM. Spatial analysis of gene regulation reveals new insights into the molecular basis of upper thermal limits. Molecular Ecology. 2014;23: 6135–6151. pmid:25401770
  93. 93. Sima YH, Yao JM, Hou YS, Wang L, Zhao LC. Variations of hydrogen peroxide and catalase expression in Bombyx eggs during diapause initiation and termination. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2011;77: 72–80. pmid:21433065
  94. 94. Nover L, Scharf KD. Heat stress proteins and transcription factors. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 1997;53: 80–103. pmid:9118000
  95. 95. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000;408: 239–247. pmid:11089981
  96. 96. Bungard D, Fuerth BJ, Zeng P-Y, Faubert B, Maas NL, Viollet B, et al. Signaling kinase AMPK activates stress-promoted transcription via Histone H2B phosphorylation. Science. 2010;329: 1201–1205. pmid:20647423
  97. 97. Debec A, Courgeon AM, Maingourd M, Masonhaute C. The response of the centrosome to heat shock and related stressesin a Drosophila cell-line. Journal of Cell Science. 1990;96: 403–412.
  98. 98. Foster ER, Downs JA. Histone H2A phosphorylation in DNA double-strand break repair. FEBS Journal. 2005;272: 3231–3240. pmid:15978030
  99. 99. Rastrojo A, Corvo L, Lombraña R, Solana JC, Aguado B, Requena JM. Analysis by RNA-seq of transcriptomic changes elicited by heat shock in Leishmania major. Scientific Reports. 2019;9: 1–18.
  100. 100. Teets NM, Denlinger DL. Physiological mechanisms of seasonal and rapid cold-hardening in insects. Physiological Entomology. 2013;38: 105–116.
  101. 101. Truebano M, Burns G, Thorne MAS, Hillyard G, Peck LS, Skibinski DOF, et al. Transcriptional response to heat stress in the Antarctic bivalve Laternula elliptica. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. Elsevier B.V.; 2010;391: 65–72.
  102. 102. Neven LG. Physiological responses of insects to heat. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2000;21: 103–111.
  103. 103. Park HG, Han SI, Oh SY, Kang HS. Cellular responses to mild heat stress. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2005;62: 10–23. pmid:15619003
  104. 104. Khoushab F, Yamabhai M. Chitin Research Revisited. Marine Drugs. 2010;8: 1988–2012. pmid:20714419
  105. 105. Teng Z, Sun C, Liu S, Wang H, Zhang S. Functional characterization of chitinase-3 reveals involvement of chitinases in early embryo immunity in zebrafish. Developmental and Comparative Immunology. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;46: 489–498. pmid:24968080
  106. 106. Okada Y, Yamaura K, Suzuki T, Itoh N, Osada M, Takahashi KG. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of chitinase from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;165: 83–89. pmid:23507628
  107. 107. Arakane Y, Muthukrishnan S. Insect chitinase and chitinase-like proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2010; 201–216. pmid:19816755
  108. 108. Cai Q, Lu X, Ma J. Molecular cloning and expression profiling of a cold stress-related chitinase gene Mpcht19 in the desert beetle Microdera punctipennis (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica. 2017;60: 286–296.
  109. 109. Zhang Q, Zhang L, Yang X, Wang X, Li X, Wang J, et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of Tibetan Gynaephora to explore the genetic basis of insect adaptation to divergent altitude environments. Scientific Reports. Springer US; 2017; 1–10. pmid:29208990
  110. 110. Du XJ, Wang JX, Liu N, Zhao XF, Li FH, Xiang JH. Identification and molecular characterization of a peritrophin-like protein from fleshy prawn (Fenneropenaeus chinensis). Molecular Immunology. 2006;43: 1633–1644. pmid:16271393
  111. 111. Narasimhan S, Rajeevan N, Liu L, Zhao YO, Heisig J, Pan J, et al. Gut microbiota of the tick vector Ixodes scapularis modulate colonization of the Lyme disease spirochete. Cell Host and Microbe. Elsevier Inc.; 2014;15: 58–71. pmid:24439898
  112. 112. Lang M, Kanost MR, Gorman MJ. Multicopper oxidase-3 is a laccase associated with the peritrophic matrix of Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e33985. pmid:22479493
  113. 113. Clark MS, Worland MR. How insects survive the cold: Molecular mechanisms—A review. Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology. 2008;178: 917–933. pmid:18584182
  114. 114. Stapley J, Santure AW, Dennis SR. Transposable elements as agents of rapid adaptation may explain the genetic paradox of invasive species. Molecular Ecology. 2015;24: 2241–2252. pmid:25611725
  115. 115. Traylor-Knowles N, Rose NH, Sheets EA, Palumbi SR. Early Transcriptional Responses during Heat Stress in the Coral Acropora hyacinthus. Biology Bulletin. 2017;232: 91–100. pmid:28654330
  116. 116. DeSalvo MK, Voolstra RC, Sunagawa S, Schwarz JA, Stillman JH, Coffroth MA, et al. Differential gene expression during thermal stress and bleaching in the Caribbean coral Montastraea faveolata. Molecular Ecology. 2008;17: 3952–3971. pmid:18662230
  117. 117. Konorov EA. Genomic Signatures of Selection between Urban and Rural Populations of Black Garden Ant Lasius niger. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2018;54: 218–225.
  118. 118. Diamond SE, Chick L, Perez A, Strickler SA, Martin RA. Rapid evolution of ant thermal tolerance across an urban-rural temperature cline. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2017;121: 248–257.
  119. 119. Liu S, Wang X, Sun F, Zhang J, Feng J, Liu H, et al. RNA-Seq reveals expression signatures of genes involved in oxygen transport, protein synthesis, folding, and degradation in response to heat stress in catfish. Physiological Genomics. 2013;45: 462–476. pmid:23632418
  120. 120. Yu Y, Fuscoe JC, Zhao C, Guo C, Jia M, Qing T, et al. A rat RNA-Seq transcriptomic BodyMap across 11 organs and 4 developmental stages. Nature Communications. 2014;5: 3230–3240. pmid:24510058
  121. 121. Clements J, Schoville S, Peterson N, Huseth AS, Lan Q, Groves RL. RNA interference of three up-regulated transcripts associated with insecticide resistance in an imidacloprid resistant population of Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. The Authors; 2017;135: 35–40. pmid:28043328
  122. 122. Fraser HB. Gene expression drives local adaptation in humans. Genome research. 2013;23: 1089–96. pmid:23539138
  123. 123. Auld JR, Agrawal AA, Relyea RA. Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;277: 503–511. pmid:19846457