Figures
Abstract
Background
The myocardial adaptive mechanism in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is less understood. We aimed to investigate biventricular myocardial adaptive remodeling in rTOF patients.
Methods
We recruited 32 rTOF patients and 38 age- and sex-matched normal controls. The pulmonary stenosis of rTOF patients was measured using catheterized pressure gradient between right ventricle (RV) and pulmonary artery (PGRVPA). rTOF patients with PGRVPA < 15 mmHg and ≥15 mmHg were classified as low pulmonary stenosis (rTOFlow, n = 19) and high pulmonary stenosis (rTOFhigh, n = 13) subgroups, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging tissue phase mapping was employed to evaluate the voxelwise biventricular myocardial motion in longitudinal (Vz), radial (Vr), and circumferential (Vφ) directions.
Results
The rTOFlow subgroup presented higher pulmonary regurgitation fraction than rTOFhigh subgroup (p < 0.001). Compared with the normal group, only rTOFlow subgroup presented a decreased RV ejection fraction (RVEF) (p < 0.05). The rTOFlow subgroup showed decreased systolic and diastolic Vz in RV and LV, whereas rTOFhigh subgroup showed such change only in RV. In rTOFlow subgroup, RVEF significantly correlated with RV systolic Vr (r = 0.56, p < 0.05), whereas LVEF correlated with LV systolic Vz (r = 0.51, p = 0.02). Prolonged QRS correlated with RV systolic Vr (r = -0.58, p < 0.01) and LV diastolic Vr (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). No such correlations occurred in rTOFhigh subgroup.
Citation: Chang M-C, Wu M-T, Weng K-P, Chien K-J, Lin C-C, Su M-Y, et al. (2020) Biventricular myocardial adaptation in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: Mechanistic insights from magnetic resonance imaging tissue phase mapping. PLoS ONE 15(8): e0237193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237193
Editor: Otavio Rizzi Coelho-Filho, Faculty of Medical Science - State University of Campinas, BRAZIL
Received: March 11, 2020; Accepted: July 21, 2020; Published: August 11, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study has received funding by the Veterans General Hospitals and University System of Taiwan Joint Research Program (VGHUST103-G3-1-1, VGHUST103-G3-1-2, VGHUST104-G7-7-1, VGHUST104-G7-7-2, VGHUST104-G7-7-3, VGHUST105-G3-1-1, VGHUST105-G3-1-2, VGHUST105-G3-1-3 (recipient: KPW)). This study was also supported in part by Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (MOST 104-2314-B-075B-007 (recipient: KPW); NSC 102-2320-B-007-003-MY3, MOST 103-2314-B-010-018-MY3, MOST 105-2314-B-007-003, MOST 106-2314-B-007-006-MY3 (recipient: HHP)). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is an important problematic sequel in patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). Although PR can be tolerated for many years, chronic PR can lead to right ventricular (RV) volume overload, hypertrophy, fibrosis, myocardial injury, and heart failure overtime [1–4]. In addition, left ventricle (LV) remodeling is consequently affected [3,5–9]. Therefore, surgical strategy has shifted from complete relief of pulmonary stenosis (PS) toward restrictive enlargement of the pulmonary annulus to maintain a certain pressure gradient between the RV and pulmonary artery (PA) trunk (PGRVPA). Studies have observed that an adequate PGRVPA can serve as a protective factor limiting the unfavorable effect of PR on RV function in rTOF patients [10–13].
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard method for comprehensive evaluation of rTOF patients [1–3,6,14]. MRI tissue phase mapping (TPM) has been approved for precise assessment of voxel-wise myocardial function for patients with a variety of heart diseases [15–19], and serves as a potential new diagnostic biomarker for rTOF patients [5]. As compared to speckle-tracking echocardiography and other MRI sequences for myocardial performance, such as myocardial tagging and feature tracking [20], TPM using a 2D acquisition has the advantages of less operator-dependence, high spatial resolution, and direct three-directional measurements of myocardial motion. Therefore, it simplifies the post-processing and enable LV as well as RV evaluation in rTOF.
In this case–control study, the catheterization-based PGRVPA was measured to differentiate rTOF patients with low and high PS. We aimed to investigate the biventricular myocardial adaptive mechanisms on account of residual PS in rTOF patients using TPM from mechanistic insights.
Methods
Study cohort
This study protocol was approved by the ethics committee at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung (VGHKS14-CT1-16), Taiwan and all procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and research committees. All participants provided written informed consent prior to cardiac MRI examination. The study population consisted of 32 rTOF patients (age: 22.5 ± 3.8 years; male: 19) and 38 normal controls (age: 22.1 ± 1.8 years; male: 23) without known cardiovascular diseases. The rTOF patients underwent electrocardiography (ECG), treadmill, blood sampling for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurement, and catheterization for assessment of hemodynamic status. The rTOF patients and normal controls were subjected to cardiac MRI examination. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Subgrouping of rTOF patients according to residual PS
Catheterization-based cutoff value of 15 mmHg based on PR of 40% in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was selected in this series. According to the cutoff value of PGRVPA, we defined rTOF patients with PGRVPA< 15 mmHg as the subgroup with low PS (rTOFlow) and rTOF patients with PGRVPA ≥ 15 mmHg as the subgroup with high PS (rTOFhigh). The surgical procedure of transannular patch was performed on 12 of 19 and 8 of 13 patients in rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups, respectively.
Catheterization, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and laboratory testing
A 7 F Berman catheter was inserted into a femoral vein and a 5 F pig-tail catheter was inserted into the femoral artery when rTOF patients underwent catheterization. Both catheters were connected to pressure transducers. A Berman catheter was advanced into the right atrium, RV, and main PA to measure pressure. The PGRVPA was also recorded. All pressures measurements were taken in the supine position and at end-expiration.The normal controls did not undergo catheterization.
The rTOF patients underwent an exercise stress test on a treadmill with the standard Bruce protocol [21]. An exercise testing equipment, which comprised a treadmill, a flow module, a gas analyzer, and an electrocardiographic monitor (Metamax 3B, Cortex Biophysik GmbH Co., Germany), was used to measure the exercise capacity. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured from the results of a graded treadmill exercise until exhaustion. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were also measured during resting and peak state. HR reserve (HRR) was defined as the HR change between 1 minute after test and peak state during test. The metabolic equivalent (MET) of peak VO2 was defined as the unit of resting oxygen uptake. The BNP level was measured using commercial ARCHITECT BNP Reagent Kits (Abbott Laboratories).
Cardiac MRI acquisition
Images were acquired using a 3-T MR scanner (Skyra or Tim Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). A retrospective ECG-gating approach was used to acquire two-dimensional breath-hold steady-state free precession based cine images in short-axis view with 30 time frames per cardiac cycle. The protocol parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 3.1/1.6ms, pixel size = 1.17 × 1.17 mm2, slice thickness = 6 mm, interslice gap = 4mm, and flip angle = 50°. Consecutive 10–12 short-axis views covering the entire LV and RV enabled determination of the cardiac function, including the volumetric indices, mass, and ejection fraction (EF).
The two-dimensional phase-contrast MRI in this study was performed with retrospective ECG triggering and free breathing to calculate the PR fraction, which was defined as backward flow volume divided by forward flow volume. The scanning parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 9.9/2.7 ms, flip angle = 30°, matrix size = 192 × 174 (interpolated into 256 × 256), field of view = 24–32 cm, slice thickness = 6 mm, views per segment = 2, and average = 2. Forty phases per cardiac cycle were reconstructed. Velocity encoding was initially set at 150 cm/s and increased by 100 cm/s if an aliasing artifact was present. The main PA was targeted at its midpoint between the pulmonary valve and bifurcation. The imaging planes were prescribed as strictly perpendicular to the vessels by using the double-oblique technique.
A two-dimensional dark-blood fast low-angle shot sequence was performed to acquire TPM. Images were prescribed in consecutive three short-axis slices (base, mid, and apex). The basal slice was prescribed at 1cm beneath the mitral valve level at end-systole, followed consecutively by middle and apical slices. Prospective ECG-triggering was performed for synchronization with the cardiac motions. Navigator-echo monitoring was performed to trace the location of the right hemidiaphragm. Velocity encoding was set to 15 and 25 cm/s for in-plane and through-plane motions, respectively. The protocol parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 6.5/4.2 ms, pixel size = 1.17×1.17 mm2, slice thickness = 6 mm, flip angle = 7°, acceleration factor = 5 with the PEAK-GRAPPA accelerating technique [22], and temporal resolution = 26 ms. The total scanning time was approximately 6 minutes for the three slices.
Cardiac MRI analysis
The myocardial motion was calculated using aninstitute-developed analysis tool written in MATLAB (Mathworks). After regions of interest had been determined manually on the magnitude images of each cardiac phase and each slice, the LV was divided into 16 segments according to American Heart Association recommendations [23], whereas the RV was divided into 10 segments for comprehension ofits regional motion [24]. We evaluated the peak myocardial motion in the systolic and diastolic phases in the longitudinal (Vz), radial (Vr), and circumferential (Vφ) directions as the quantitative indices of segmental and the global myocardial motion of the RV and LV. The diastolic Vφ referred to the second circumferential peak velocity during systolic period, as defined by Menza et al [24].
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of the difference between groups was assessed using ANOVA analysis or Fisher exact test when appropriate. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for the relationship between any two interested parameters. Multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction for the LV 16-segment and RV 10-segment model were performed to examine the significance of the altered myocardial motion. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to seek the cut-off value of the PGRVPA for the classification of rTOF patients into rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability was assessed in 10 rTOF patients and 10 normal controls. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of TPM parameters was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Demographic characteristics
Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the normal group, the rTOF group and the two rTOF subgroups. Both patient subgroups showed a lower peak VO2 than the regular standards reported by a previous study [8]. The other important data of rTOF patients during the exercise testing were as follows: resting systolic BP 124 ± 13 mmHg, resting diastolic BP 75 ± 7 mmHg, resting HR 81 ± 9 beats per minute, peak systolic BP 167 ± 20 mmHg, peak diastolic BP 82 ± 13 mmHg, peak HR 174 ± 14 beats per minute, and HRR 21 ± 7. All pressure indices of RV and PA in both rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups were substantially higher than the reported regular standards [25].
Global function of RV and LV
Table 2 outlines the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the LV, RV, and PA. For the PA, both rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups presented significantly higher PR fractions than normal group (both p < 0.001). Moreover, PR fraction in rTOFlow subgroup was higher than that in rTOFhigh subgroup (p < 0.001). Compared with normal controls, rTOFlow subgroup exhibited increases in most RV volumetric indices (all p < 0.001) and significant decreases in RVEF (p < 0.01). For the LV, the volumetric indices were similar in all groups, whereas the LV end systolic volume index decreased and LVEF increased only in rTOFhigh subgroup (both p < 0.05).
Myocardial motion of RV and LV
Fig 1 shows the segmental distribution of myocardial motion measured using TPM. Table 3 summarizes the global peak Vz, Vr, and Vφ of the 16 LV segments and 10 RV segments in each group. Compared with the normal group, the rTOF group showed significantly decreased RV systolic Vz (−4.0 ± 1.7 vs −6.0 ± 1.6 cm/s, p < 0.001), particularly in the basal and middle slices (Fig 1). The rTOF group also showed lower RV diastolic Vz in almost all RV segments (4.5 ± 1.4 vs 7.4 ± 1.5 cm/s, p < 0.001) and lower LV diastolic Vz (7.9 ± 1.8 vs 9.2 ± 2.0 cm/s, p < 0.05). Regarding the radial myocardial motion, only the RV diastolic Vr in the rTOF group was higher than that in the normal group (−5.7 ± 1.0 vs −4.9 ± 0.8 cm/s, p < 0.01). Decreased systolic and diastolic Vφ (i.e. the second peak during systole) were noted only in the LV of rTOF patients (p < 0.001). All the aforementioned indices did not differ significantly between rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups.
(a-d) The systolic and diastolic segmental myocardial motion in longitudinal (Vz) and (e–h) radial (Vr) directions in the normal controls (left panel) and patients with rTOF (right panel). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Effect of PR on RV pressure and biventricular function in rTOF subgroups
In rTOFlow subgroup, the PR fraction showed significantly negative correlations with PGRVPA (r = −0.53, p < 0.05; Fig 2A) and RV systolic pressure (r = −0.21, p < 0.01; Fig 2B). Moreover, the PR fraction negatively correlated with the RVEF (r = −0.67, p < 0.01; Fig 2C) and LVEF (r = −0.48, p < 0.05; Fig 2D) only in rTOFlow subgroup.
Scatterplots of PR fraction vs. PGRVPA (a), RV systolic pressure (b), RVEF (c), and LVEF (d). Significant correlations existed only in rTOF with low pulmonary stenosis.
Differential relationship of myocardial motion and electromechanical adaption in RV and LV
In rTOFlow subgroup, RVEF had a significant positive correlation with RV systolic Vr (r = 0.56, p < 0.05; Fig 3A), whereas LVEF had a significant positive correlation with LV systolic Vz (r = 0.51, p = 0.02; Fig 3B).
Scatterplots of RVEF vs. RV systolic Vr (a), LVEF vs. LV systolic Vz (b), QRS vs. RV systolic Vr (c) and QRS vs. LV diastolic Vr (d). Significant correlations existed only in rTOF with low pulmonary stenosis.
Compared with reference values in Table 1, QRS durations in both rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups were substantially prolonged. There was no significant difference between rTOFlow and rTOFhigh subgroups in terms of QRS duration (144.9 ± 33.3 vs 139.6 ± 23.7 ms, p = 0.62). However, only QRS duration in rTOFlow subgroup was significantly negatively correlated with RV systolic Vr (r = −0.58, p < 0.01; Fig 3C) and positively correlated with LV diastolic Vr (r = 0.81, p < 0.001; Fig 3D). No other significant findings or correlations were observed in rTOFhigh subgroup or normal group.
Interventricular correlation between RV and LV functions
The RVEF and LVEF were significantly correlated only in the rTOFlow subgroup (Fig 4A). However, myocardial motion of systolic Vz between RV and LV was significantly correlated in rTOFlow subgroup, rTOFhigh subgroup, and normal group (all p ≤ 0.01; Fig 4B).
Correlation between RV and LV in (a) EF and (b) systolic longitudinal motion (sys. Vz).
Discussion
In this study, we employed TPM and catheterization-based PGRVPA to elucidate the biventricular adaptive mechanism in rTOF patients. Our study demonstrated that PR fraction plays a key role in the adaptive remodeling of RV and LV in rTOF patients. Our application of TPM also revealed that the adaption of differential myocardial motions correlated with the electromechanical remodeling of both RV and LV. Notably, these findings were almost observed solely in the rTOFlow subgroup. Avoidance of interconnected relationships among PR and biventricular myocardial function was found in rTOFhigh subgroup, and this suggests that adequate residual PS may have a protective effect against PR related biventricular dysfunction in rTOF patients.
Significant negative correlations between PR fraction and RVEF (or LVEF) were observed solely in rTOFlow subgroup. Such adverse effects of PR on RVEF and LVEF were not seen in rTOFhigh subgroup, suggesting that an adequate PGRVPA may be beneficial for attenuating the vicious cycle triggered by PR in rTOF. Our findings are in line with the concept that adequate residual PS might be a suitable surgical strategy for treating TOF [10–13] and resulted in better biventricular remodeling.
Valente et al previously reported that PR and RV volume were not related to early death or ventricular tachycardia in rTOF patients [26]. However, their study group [26] included 36% patients with pulmonary valve replacement and 14% with RV-PA conduit whose results should not be generalized to rTOF patients with native PR in the current study. Compared to the possible pressure overestimation of previous echocardiography-derived cutoff values varying from 20 to 30 mmHg [10–13], catheterization-based cutoff value of 15 mmHg based on PR of 40% in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was objectively selected in this series. On the other hand, although our results demonstrated the potential association between PS and myocardial adaptation in young adult rTOF patients in a relatively early stage without showing clinical adverse outcomes, the potential harm of PS on ventricular function can not be neglected according to Valente et al’s study [26]. The appropriate PS in rTOF patients with various clinical conditions requires further investigations in a large cohort.
TPM has the advantages of high spatial resolution and direct three-directional measurements of myocardial motion. This technique has been used to demonstrate that rTOF patients may exhibit RV myocardial motion abnormality owing to excess stress in response to volume overload [1,6,14]. We found that most myocardial motion in rTOFlow subgroup decreased in both RV and LV, whereas myocardial motion in rTOFhigh subgroup decreased in RV and was normal in LV. This may suggest that LV adaption was secondary to RV changes with the progression of RV dysfunction.
We found that differential myocardial motion adaption underlined RV and LV remodeling in rTOFlow subgroup. RVEF closely correlated with RV systolic Vr, whereas LVEF closely correlated with LV systolic Vz. The discrepancy between RV and LV adaption may be partially explained by the different inherent but integrative myofiber architectures in the two ventricles and also by a substantial adaptive increased thickness of the circumferential layer found histopathologically in the RV of rTOF patients [27,28]. In addition, RV diastolic Vr paradoxically increased in rTOF group, which may reflect a compensatory radial motion accelerated predominantly in the diastolic phase of overloaded RV [7].
We found prolonged QRS durations in both rTOF subgroups. Electromechanical interaction with prolonged QRS duration has been described as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in rTOF patients [4,29,30]. However, QRS prolongation was positively correlated with LV diastolic Vr and inversely with RV systolic Vr only in the rTOFlow subgroup. These findings suggested that altered myocardial radial motion, either in RV or LV, may underscore the adverse effect of QRS prolongation in rTOF patients without protection from adequate residual PS [4,9,31].
In a scintigraphy study of 152 patients, Movahed et al demonstrated that there was a strong significant correlation between LVEF and RVEF in patients with decreased EF, but no correlation was found in patients with normal EF [32]. This phenomenon was replicated in our results. In normal subjects and rTOFhigh patients, RVEF and LVEF are both preload- and afterload-dependent, and thus are not tied physiologically. The presence of biventricular EF correlation in rTOFlow subgroup may imply an unfavorable effect of RV on LV, and thus may also reflect the deteriorated cardiac function in rTOF patients without adequate PS. The myocardial longitudinal motion of RV and LV was disclosed to be significantly correlated in all subjects, independent of the rTOF status. The role of myocardial longitudinal motion correlation between RV and LV requires future investigation.
Although we showed the decreased LV Vφ during systole in rTOF patients compared with that of normal controls, it should be noted that the assessment of circumferential myocardial motion was more difficult to identify compared with longitudinal and radial motion [5,24]. Further, because of the complicated and low diastolic myocardial motion velocity in rTOF patients, a simple measurement of Vφ might not be able to illustrate the difference between the groups. A previous study calculated the twist function by systolic peak-to-peak Vφ and reported the difference of LV circumferential motion between normal and rTOF groups [5]. However, the twist function of RV is more complicated and required designation of a novel and accurate approach. We were unable to report RV twist function because of the limited scale in this study.
In conclusion, this study explored the adaptation of biventricular function and the differential myocardial motion components in rTOF patients in response to residual PS. From a mechanistic insight of myocardial motion adaptation, avoidance of unfavorable functional interaction in RV and LV in rTOFhigh subgroup suggested that adequate PS (PGRVPA ≥ 15 mmHg in this series) has a protective effect against PR in the ventricular remodeling of rTOF. Our findings shed light on the mechanical and electrical adaptation in both RV and LV of rTOF patients and potentially provide helpful information for surgical strategy in treating patients with TOF. A larger and longer cohort study is required to investigate the prognostic value of our findings in evaluation of rTOF patients.
Limitations
This study had some limitations. First, the thin wall of RV may have rendered the reliability of RV delineation in the TPM images. However, we acquired TPM images with a pixel size of 1.17 × 1.17 mm2, which was consistent with the spatial resolution of a highly ranked previous study on TPM of RV [33]. Second, RV twist function was not calculated and we may have oversimplified the complex biventricular adaptive mechanism in rTOF patients. Third, this cross-sectional study involved a relatively low sample size, a short postoperative period, and a lack of events such as pulmonary valve replacement and pacemaker implantation. Fourth, there is no T1 mapping data to evaluate cardiac fibrosis. A larger cohort and longer follow-up may further elucidate and validate the role of PR and PS on account of myocardial motion adaption in the prognosis of rTOF.
References
- 1. Helbing WA, Niezen RA, Le Cessie S, Van Der Geest RJ, Ottenkamp J, De Roos A. Right ventricular diastolic function in children with pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: volumetric evaluation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28(7):1827–35. pmid:8962573
- 2. Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, Siu S C, Hokanson J S, Poile C, et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet. 2000; 356(9234):975–81. pmid:11041398
- 3. Geva T, Sandweiss BM, Gauvreau K, Lock JE, Powell AJ. Factors associated with impaired clinical status in long-term survivors of tetralogy of Fallot repair evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(6):1068–74. pmid:15028368
- 4. Grothoff M, Spors B, Abdul-Khaliq H, Abd El Rahman M, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Lange P, et al. Pulmonary regurgitation is a powerful factor influencing QRS duration in patients after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006; 95(12):643–9. pmid:17021680
- 5. Chang MC, Wu MT, Weng KP, Su MY, Menza M, Huang HC, et al. Left ventricular regional myocardial motion and twist function in repaired tetralogy of Fallot evaluated by magnetic resonance tissue phase mapping. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(1):104–14. pmid:28677054
- 6. Davlouros PA, Kilner PJ, Hornung TS, Li W, Francis JM, Moon JCC, et al. Right ventricular function in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: detrimental role of right ventricular outflow aneurysms or akinesia and adverse right-to-left ventricular interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40(11):2044–52. pmid:12475468
- 7. Kempny A, Fernandez-Jimenez R, Orwat S, Schuler P, Bunck AC, Maintz D, et al. Quantification of biventricular myocardial function using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking, endocardial border delineation and echocardiographic speckle tracking in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and healthy controls. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012; 14(1):32. pmid:22650308
- 8. Weng KP, Hung YC, Huang SH, Wu HW, Chien KJ, Lin CC, et al. Abnormal biventricular performance in asymptomatic adolescents late after repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Combined two-dimensional speckle tracking and three-dimensional echocardiography study. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018; 81(2):170–7. pmid:29191613
- 9. Mueller M, Rentzsch A, Hoetzer K, Raedle-Hurst T, Boettler P, Stiller B, et al. Assessment of interventricular and right-intraventricular dyssynchrony in patients with surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot by two-dimensional speckle tracking. Eur J Echocardio. 2010; 11(9):786–92. pmid:20513701
- 10. Chen CA, Chen SY, Wang JK, Tseng WY, Chiu HH, Chang CI, et al. Ventricular geometric characteristics and functional benefit of mild right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in patients with significant pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Am Heart J. 2014; 167(4):555–561. pmid:24655705
- 11. Latus H, Gummel K, Rupp S, Valeske K, Akintuerk H, Jux C, et al. Beneficial effects of residual right ventricular outflow tract obstruction on right ventricular volume and function in patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013; 34(2):424–30. pmid:22915139
- 12. Śpiewak M, Biernacka EK, Małek ŁA, Petryka J, Kowalski M, Miłosz B, et al. Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction as a confounding factor in the assessment of the impact of pulmonary regurgitation on the right ventricular size and function in patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(5):1040–1046. pmid:21509859
- 13. Yoo BW, Kim JO, Kim YJ, Choi JY, Park HK, Park YH, et al. Impact of pressure load caused by right ventricular outflow tract obstruction on right ventricular volume overload in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(6):1299–304. pmid:22244553
- 14. Geva T. Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011; 13(1):9. pmid:21251297
- 15. Delfino JG, Bhasin M, Cole R, Eisner RL, Merlino J, Leon AR, et al. Comparison of myocardial velocities obtained with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping and tissue Doppler imaging in normal subjects and patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24(2):304–11. pmid:16786564
- 16. Foell D, Jung BA, Germann E, Staehle F, Bode C, Hennig J, et al. Segmental myocardial velocities in dilated cardiomyopathy with and without left bundle branch block. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 37(1):119–26. pmid:22987362
- 17. Foll D, Jung B, Schilli E, Staehle F, Geibel A, Hennig J, et al. Magnetic resonance tissue phase mapping of myocardial motion: new insight in age and gender. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(1):54–64. pmid:19996380
- 18. Föll D, Jung B, Staehle F, Schilli E, Bode C, Hennig J, et al. Visualization of multidirectional regional left ventricular dynamics by high‐temporal‐resolution tissue phase mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 29(5):1043–52. pmid:19388130
- 19. Srichai MB, Lim RP, Wong S, Lee VS. Cardiovascular applications of phase-contrast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(3):662–75. pmid:19234262
- 20. Salerno M. Feature Tracking by CMR: A "Double Feature"? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11(2 Pt 1):206–8. pmid:28528158
- 21. Bruce RA. Methods of exercise testing: step test, bicycle, treadmill, isometrics. Am J Cardiol. 1974; 33(6):715–20. pmid:4824847
- 22. Jung B, Ullmann P, Honal M, Bauer S, Hennig J, Markl M. Parallel MRI with extended and averaged GRAPPA kernels (PEAK‐GRAPPA): Optimized spatiotemporal dynamic imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 28(5):1226–32. pmid:18972331
- 23. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart a statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105(4):539–42. pmid:11815441
- 24. Menza M, Foll D, Hennig J, Jung B. Segmental biventricular analysis of myocardial function using high temporal and spatial resolution tissue phase mapping. Magma. 2018; 31(1):61–73. pmid:29143137
- 25. Bonow RO, Mann D, Zipes D, Libby P. Cardiac Catheterization. Braunwald's Heart Disease E-Book: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 10th ed; 2014, p364–91.
- 26. Valente AM, Gauvreau K, Assenza GE, Babu-Narayan SV, Schreier J, Gatzoulis MA, et al. Contemporary predictors of death and sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot enrolled in the INDICATOR cohort. Heart. 2014; 100(3):247–53. pmid:24179163
- 27. Ghonim S, Voges I, Gatehouse PD, Keegan J, Gatzoulis MA, Kilner PJ, et al. Myocardial Architecture, Mechanics, and Fibrosis in Congenital Heart Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2017; 4:30. pmid:28589126
- 28. Sanchez-Quintana D, Anderson RH, Ho SY. Ventricular myoarchitecture in tetralogy of Fallot. Heart. 1996;76(3):280–6. pmid:8868990
- 29. Gatzoulis M, Till J, Somerville J, Redington A. Mechanoelectrical Interaction in Tetralogy of Fallot: QRS Prolongation Relates to Right Ventricular Size and Predicts Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death. Circulation. 1995; 92(2):231–7. pmid:7600655
- 30. van Huysduynen BH, van Straten A, Swenne CA, Maan AC, van Eck HJ, Schalij MJ, et al. Reduction of QRS duration after pulmonary valve replacement in adult Fallot patients is related to reduction of right ventricular volume. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(9):928–32. pmid:15716288
- 31. D'Andrea A, Caso P, Sarubbi B, D'Alto M, Giovanna Russo M, Scherillo M, et al. Right ventricular myocardial activation delay in adult patients with right bundle branch block late after repair of Tetralogy of Fallot. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004; 5(2):123–31. pmid:15036024
- 32. Movahed MR, Milne N. Poor correlation between left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with normal ventricular function. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2008;13(4):179–81. pmid:19343163
- 33. Steeden JA, Knight DS, Bali S, Atkinson D, Taylor AM, Muthurangu V. Self‐navigated tissue phase mapping using a golden‐angle spiral acquisition—proof of concept in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(1):145–55. pmid:23412927