Dihydroxyacetone of wheat root exudates serves as an attractant for Heterodera avenae

Gaofeng Wang; Yunhe Wang; Hazem Abdelnabby; Xueqiong Xiao; Wenkun Huang; Deliang Peng; Yannong Xiao

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236317

Abstract

Heterodera avenae, as an obligate endoparasite, causes severe yield loss in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Investigation on the mechanisms how H. avenae perceives wheat roots is limited. Here, the attractiveness of root exudates from eight plant genotypes to H. avenae were evaluated on agar plates. Results showed that the attraction of H. avenae to the root exudates from the non-host Brachypodium distachyon variety Bd21-3 was the highest, approximately 50 infective second-stage juveniles (J2s) per plate, followed by that from three H. avenae-susceptible wheat varieties, Zhengmai9023, Yanmai84 and Xiangmai25, as well as the resistant one of Xinyuan958, whereas the lowest attractive activity was observed in the two H. avenae-resistant wheat varieties, Xianmai20 (approximately 12 J2s/plate) and Liangxing66 (approximately 11 J2s/plate). Then Bd21-3, Zhengmai9023 and Heng4399 were selected for further assays as their different attractiveness and resistance to H. avenae, and attractants for H. avenae in their root exudates were characterized to be heat-labile and low-molecular compounds (LM) by behavioral bioassay. Based on these properties of the attractants, a principle of identifying attractants for H. avenae was set up. Then LM of six root exudates from the three plants with and without heating were separated and analyzed by HPLC-MS. Finally, dihydroxyacetone (DHA), methylprednisolone succinate, embelin and diethylpropionin in the root exudates were identified to be putative attractants for H. avenae according to the principle, and the attraction of DHA to H. avenae was validated by behavioral bioassay on agar. Our study enhances the recognition to the orientation mechanism of H. avenae towards wheat roots.

Citation: Wang G, Wang Y, Abdelnabby H, Xiao X, Huang W, Peng D, et al. (2020) Dihydroxyacetone of wheat root exudates serves as an attractant for Heterodera avenae. PLoS ONE 15(7): e0236317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317

Editor: Sergio Saia, Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, ITALY

Received: February 17, 2020; Accepted: July 3, 2020; Published: July 23, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: Yannong Xiao gets the financial support of the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503114) and National Nature Science Foundations of China (31571988), and Gaofeng Wang gets the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662017JC031). Science and Technology Research Fund “STDF” provided funding to Hazem Abdelnabby: (Project ID: 30369). The sponsors or funders play none roles in the study.

Competing interests: NO authors have competing interests.

Introduction

Cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae is one of the most important nematode pests that limits production of small grain cereals. Heavily invaded young plants are stunted and leaves are often chlorotic, forming pale green patches in the field [1]. It is believed that attractive cues of plant root exudates for nematodes mediate the recognition between plants and nematodes, and the nematode sense organs, amphids functioning as chemoreceptors are mainly responsible for detecting the chemochemicals [2–4]. In addition to this function, root exudates also play crucial roles in other biological processes. For instance, root exudates can increase nematode egg hatching rate [5, 6], and plant can alter its rhizosphere microbial community structure and diversity through its root exudates [7, 8].

Biotic and abiotic factors have effects on the components of plant root exudates. In tall fescue, its endophytical fungus, Neotyphodium coenophialum synthesizes special alkaloids in roots altering the chemotaxis of the pathogenic nematode, Pratylenchus scribneri to the roots [9]. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Funneliformis mosseae, can change tomato root exudates, and this results in the reduction of the penetration of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato roots [10]. Similarly, tomato root exudates could also be modified by M. incognita, leading to contents of the four compounds, 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate, dibutyl phthalate and dimethyl phthalate, in the root exudates being increased [11]. Meanwhile, the abiotic factor exogenous thiamine that was drenched on rice roots could weaken M. graminicola attraction to the roots [12], indicating the modification of rice root exudates caused by thiamine. Abiotic factors may alter root exudates through modulating phytohormone signaling, as phytohormones were found to control nematode responses to plant roots [13, 14].

Some attractants of plant root exudates for plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) have been identified, including CO₂, g-aminobutyric acid, ions, glucose and so on [4, 15, 16]. Among these attractants, CO₂ can attract free-living, entomopathogenic and plant parasitical nematodes [4], and CO₂ seems to be a common attractive cue of plants for PPNs. It was found that M. hapla is attracted to pH gradients between pH 4.5 and 5.4, which implies the attractiveness of CO₂ for nematodes may be due to acidification of solutions by dissolved CO₂ [17]. This may also be the underlying mechanisms of some organic acids in root exudates attracting PPNs. In addition to attractants, there are also repellents of plant root exudates for PPNs, and attractiveness of root exudates to PPNs are determined by the combined effect of attractants and repellents, where the chemotactic responses of PPNs to roots depend on the ratios of attractants to repellents in the root leachates [18–20]. Moreover, the responses of PPNs to their attractants are concentration-dependent [16, 21].

Although researches on chemotaxis of PPNs to host roots have made significant progress, it remains elusive how PPNs recognize plant roots. The main objective of our works was to identify attractive cues of wheat (Triticum aestivum) root exudates for H. avenae through behavioral bioassay and HPLC-MS assay, which increases the recognition to the orientation mechanism of H. avenae towards wheat roots.

Materials and methods

Nematode culture and isolation

Cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae was maintained on a compatible wheat (Triticum aestivum) variety Zhengmai9023 at 16 °C in a greenhouse. Cysts were harvested from in vitro stock cultures and eggs in the cysts were hatched at 16 °C after at least a month incubation at 4 °C. Then freshly hatched second-stage juveniles (J2s) outside the cysts were collected.

Preparations of root exudates

Eight plant genotypes were used in this study, including a non-host Brachypodium distachyon variety (Bd21-3), four resistant (Xinmai20, Xinyuan958, Heng4399, Liangxing66) and three susceptible (Zhengmai9023, Xiangmai25 and Yanmai84) wheat varieties toward H. avenae. Root exudate of each variety was collected from 300 seedlings by a standard preparation that was used repeatedly throughout these studies. Seeds were sterilized in 0.5% NaClO solution for 5 min, washed thoroughly with distilled sterile water for three times and transferred to fifteen-cm-diameter petri plates containing distilled sterile water and filter papers. After 3 days of incubation in the dark at 25 °C, seedlings (about 3 cm in height) were transferred to three boxes with 300 mL 1/2 MS solution for further growth under the condition of 16 h light/8 h dark at 25 °C. After 30 days, seedling roots were washed with distilled sterile water for four times, and transferred to new boxes with distilled sterile water (200 mL) for further growth under the same conditions. After 3 days, the root exudates solution was passed through a 0.45-μm filter, followed by freeze-drying for 3 days at -50 °C. Finally, the root exudate of each variety was dissolved with distilled sterile water (1 mg/mL) and stored at 4 °C.

For characterizing the physical and chemical properties of attractants for H. avenae in root exudates of Bd21-3, Heng4399 and Zhengmai9023 prepared above, each root exudate underwent two different treatments, respectively. In the first treatment, each root exudate (100 μL) was heated at 50 °C, 75 °C and 100 °C for 15 min in a tube sealed, respectively, using correspondingly original root exudate solutions (ORE) and distilled sterile water as positive and negative controls. In the second treatment, the low- and high-molecular weight compounds (LM and HM) of each root exudate (100 μL) were isolated with Zeba^™ Spin Desalting Columns (Thermo, Cat. No. 89882) according to its protocol, and dissolved with distilled sterile water (100 μL), using corresponding ORE and distilled sterile water as positive and negative control. For HPLC-MS assay, LM were isolated from root exudate solutions prepared (200 μL) as described above, and dissolved with distilled sterile water (200 μL). Then LM (100 μL) was heated at 100°C, using the LM without heating (100 μL) as reference. Finally, all the root exudates were freeze-dried for 3 days and dissolved in methanol (100 μL). All the treated root exudate solutions were stored at 4 °C for use.

Chemotaxis assay

The responses of H. avenae to ORE and that with different treatments, as well as dihydroxyacetone (DHA; Sigma, Cat. No. PHR1430) with different concentrations (0.1 mg/L, 0.5 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L) were analyzed. Five-cm-diameter Petri dishes containing 5 mL of 0.5% agar were used, where two circular marks (1 cm diameter) were made on each plate bottom that were both 1.5 cm away from the plate center. The root exudates and DHA (10 μL) that were screened was added into 1.5 mL tube containing 0.5% agar (200 μL), respectively. After the agar becoming to be solid, it was placed on the agar surface over the center of one circle, and 0.5% agar without samples over the second one was set up as negative control. H. avenae J2s (100 J2s/plate) were placed in the center of the plate. The numbers of J2s around agar containing the sample tested within 2 mm were counted at 12 h after nematodes being placed. There were five replicates for each experiment and two biological repeats.

HPLC-MS assay

The principle of identifying the attractants from root exudates tested for H. avenae was set up, where root exudates of a non-host of H. avenae, B. distachyon (Bd21-3), four H. avenae-resistant and three H. avenae-susceptible wheat varieties were collected, and attractants for H. avenae in these root exudates were identified that were presumed to exist in all the eight root exudates (Fig 1). Details on this principle are as follows. Firstly, the attractiveness of root exudates from the eight plants to H. avenae was assessed, respectively, and three of them with different resistance levels and high attractiveness to H. avenae were selected for the next analyses. Secondly, the physical properties of putative attractants for H. avenae in the three root exudates were characterized, including their molecular weights and thermal stabilities. For analyzing their molecular weights, low- and high-molecular compounds (LM & HM) in the three root exudates were isolated with Zeba^™ Spin Desalting Columns, respectively. Meanwhile, the three root exudates were heated at 50°C, 75°C and 100°C, respectively to prepare different root exudates used for analyzing thermal stabilities of the putative attractants. Then, chemotactic responses of H. avenae to all the root exudates prepared above were assayed, using the corresponding OREs as controls. Finally, putative attractants for H. avenae in root exudates of the three varieties were determined to be LM and heat-labile by comparing the attractive activities to H. avenae among ORE, LM and HM and among root exudates with and without heating of each variety prepared above, respectively. Thirdly, LMs of the three varieties were heated at 100°C, and identifications and quantifications of these LMs with and without heating were performed through HPLC-MS assay. Finally, putative attractants for H. avenae in root exudates of the three varieties were identified that existed in all the three root exudates, and contents of which were decreased after heating. Putative attractants were validated with their reference materials.

Download:

Fig 1. Schematic view of identifying attractants of root exudates for H. avenae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.g001

The HPLC-MS assay of each root exudate sample was performed as follows. Samples (1.0 μL/sample) were subjected to HPLC-MS assay. Using an XDB-C18 column, HPLC analysis was performed with acetonitrile and 2.0% (v/v) acetic acid (pH = 2.59) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The temperature conditions were as follows: Ion source: 230 °C; inlet: 250 °C. Ionization mode: EI, electron energy 70 eV; mass scan range: 29–350 m/z, solvent delay time 4.5 min. The various components were identified from the retention times and mass spectra using the reference material from Mass Spectral Library. Quantification was performed using an internal standard, ribitol (99%, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Steinheim, Germany) that was added to each sample.

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± SE. The experimental data were analyzed by Tukey’s test that was conducted with IBM SPSS software (Version 30.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values with P < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Attractions of H. avenae to root exudates from eight different plant varieties were characterized

Out of all the eight root exudates from different plants, that from B. distachyon variety Bd21-3 showed the highest attractive activity to H. avenae, which followed by the three susceptible wheat varieties Zhengmai9023, Yanmai84 and Xiangmai25 and a resistant wheat variety Xinyuan958 (P < 0.01; Fig 2). The lowest attraction level of H. avenae to root exudates were observed in the two H. avenae resistant wheat varieties, Xianmai20 and Liangxing66 (P < 0.01; Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Attraction levels of H. avenae to different root exudates.

Root exudates from a non-host of H. avenae B. distachyon variety (Bd21-3), six wheat varieties (Xinmai20, Xinyuan958, Heng4399, Liangxing66, Xiangmai25 and Zhengmai9023) and an Oat variety (Yanmai84) were collected. Attraction of H. avenae to each root exudate was tested, respectively, using distilled sterile water as negative control. Different letters above the bars denote a significant difference (P < 0.01). Values were means ± SE, n = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.g002

Attractants of root exudates tested for H. avenae were heat-labile and low molecular compounds

Physical and chemical properties of putative attractants for H. avenae in root exudates from Bd21-3, Zhengmai9023 and Heng4399 were characterized. Results showed that attraction levels of H. avenae to the root exudates that were heated at 50 °C were significantly reduced in that of Bd21-3, but not for Zhengmai9023 and Heng4399 (P < 0.01; Fig 3). Meanwhile, root exudates heated at 100 °C resulted in lower attractive activities to H. avenae for all the three plant root exudates (P < 0.01; Fig 3). These data elucidated that the putative attractants that were present in all the three plant root exudates for H. avenae were heat-labile.

Download:

Fig 3. Chemotactic responses of H. avenae to root exudates with different heat-treatments.

Root exudates of the B. distachyon variety Bd21-3 (non-host) and two wheat varieties Zhengmai9023 (susceptible) and Heng4399 (resistant) were heated at 50 °C, 75 °C and 100 °C for 15 min, respectively. Then the attractiveness of each root exudate for H. avenae was tested, respectively, using original root exudates (ORE) and distilled sterile water as positive and negative controls. Different letters above the bars denote a significant difference (P < 0.01). Values were means ± SE, n = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.g003

In addition, low-molecular compounds (LM) showed higher attractive activities to H. avenae than high-molecular compounds (HM) for the two root exudates from Bd21-3 and Zhengmai9023, but not for that from Heng4399, where the attractiveness of LM to H. avenae was approximately 30 J2s/plate, 24 J2s/plate and 13 J2s/plate, respectively (P < 0.01; Fig 4). It was implied that attractants included in all the three root exudates for H. avenae were also low-molecular compounds. However, the highest attractive activities to H. avenae were observed at original root exudates for all the three plants (P < 0.01; Fig 4).

Download:

Fig 4. Chemotactic responses of H. avenae to compounds with different molecular weights isolated from the three root exudates tested.

Compounds with low- and high- molecular weight (LM and HM) were isolated from the root exudates of the B. distachyon variety Bd21-3 (non-host) and two wheat varieties Zhengmai9023 (susceptible) and Heng4399 (resistant) with Zeba^™ Spin Desalting Columns, respectively. Then the attractiveness of these original root exudate solutions (ORE), LM and HM for H. avenae were tested, using distilled sterile water as negative control. Different letters above the bars denote a significant difference (P < 0.01). Values were means ± SE, n = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.g004

Four putative attractants for H. avenae were identified in root exudates

Based on the principle of identifying the attractants from root exudates tested for H. avenae, the B. distachyon variety Bd21-3 and two wheat varieties (Heng4399 and Zhengmai9023) were selected to screen the putative attractants for H. avenae for their different resistance levels and high attractions of H. avenae to their root exudates described above. In addition, for the putative attractants were low-molecular and heat-labile compounds, the putative attractants were identified by screening low-molecular compounds that existed in all the three root exudates of Bd21-3, Heng4399 and Zhengmai9023, of which the contents were declined after being heated at 100 °C as they are heat-labile. Results of HPLC-MS assay showed that 60, 25 and 29 different compounds were identified in root exudates of Bd21-3, Heng4399 and Zhengmai9023, respectively, including organic acid, aldehyde, amino acid and so on, and 32, 22 and 11 different compounds were reduced after heated, respectively (S1-S3 Tables). Finally, four putative attractants for H. avenae were identified, which were Dihydroxyacetone (DHA), methylprednisolone succinate, embelin and diethylpropion (Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. Putative compounds mediating the chemotaxis of H. avenae on three root exudates tested.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.t001

DHA validation as an attractant for H. avenae

Using the reference material of DHA, chemotaxis of H. avenae to DHA was validated by behavioral bioassay on agar. Compared with sterilized distilled water, significant attractive activity of DHA to H. avenae was observed (approximately 31 J2s/plate) at the concentration of DHA being 0.1 mg/L, but not for that being 0.5 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L (Fig 5). In addition, higher attractiveness of 0.5 mg/L DHA for H. avenae was observed compared with that of 1.0 mg/L DHA. These data implied that the attractiveness of DHA for H. avenae was concentration-dependent.

Download:

Fig 5. Chemotaxis of H. avenae to DHA with different concentrations.

Three DHA solutions with different concentrations were prepared with DHA reference material. Then the attractive activities of the three DHA solutions to H. avenae were tested, using distilled sterile water as negative control. Different letters above the bars denote a significant difference (P < 0.01). Values were means ± SE, n = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.g005

Discussion

It is well documented that host root exudates play important roles in the orientation of host roots for PPNs, whereas recognitions to the mechanisms are limited [22]. In this study, it was found that there was no detectable correlation between attractiveness and resistance of the plants to H. avenae, as the highest attractive activity of root exudates to H. avenae was observed in the non-host of H. avenae, B. distachyon variety Bd21-3, which followed by the four wheat varieties with and without resistance to H. avenae. The similar result is observed in banana, where both the susceptible and resistant banana varieties towards Radopholus similis attract this nematode [23]. It was also deduced that certain common attractive cues for H. avenae existed in all root exudates tested in this study. The postulation is supported by the findings of CO₂ serving as attractant for Panagrellus silusiae, Ditylenchus dipsaci, M. incognita and other below-ground living herbivores [24–26]. It is a logical hypothesis that the common attractants for H. avenae in both B. distachyon and wheat root exudates are most likely to be found in their root exudates with higher attractiveness to H. avenae, although the chemotaxis of PPNs to root exudates are determined by both attractants and repellents for PPNs in root exudates [20, 22, 27]. According to the speculation, the B. distachyon variety Bd21-3 and two wheat varieties Zhengmai9023 and Heng4399 were selected for further identifications of attractive cues for H. avenae because of their higher attractive activities and different resistance to H. avenae.

In addition, the attractants for H. avenae in root exudates from the three plants were characterized to be heat-labile and LM. Attractants for nematodes with the heat-labile character are also found in soybean and citrus root exudates [28–30]. However, attractants for PPNs in root exudates with different physical and chemical properties from that found in this study are described, such as that in onion exudate roots [31]. Based on the properties of the target attractants, LMs in root exudates of Bd21-3, Zhengmai9305 and Heng4399 were further identified and quantified by HPLC-MS. There are limited component assays for B. distachyon root exudates [32]. Several works refer to the GC-MS assays of wheat root exudates [33–35], where the materials found in the root exudates are different from that we found in this study. It might be due to the different assay methods. Our data provides intriguing insights into the recognitions to the components of B. distachyon and wheat root exudates.

Finally, four putative attractants were identified, including DHA. However, none of them has been reported as attractive cue of plant to pests, including PPNs. The three putative attractants, methylprednisolone succinate, embelin and diethylpropion, are applied in pharmacological studies and medical treatments [36–38], whereas mass productions of these three compounds are unavaible. However, DHA is widely used in food processing industry, cosmetic industry and medical field as a kind of important chemical product [39], indicating its mature mass production, which makes DHA show greater application potential in H. avenae control compared with the three other putative attractants. The attractiveness of DHA to H. avenae was assessed at concentrations ranged from 0.1 μg/mL (20 ng/plate) to 1.0 μg/mL (200 ng/plate). It has been reported that contents of wheat root exudate compounds analyzed ranged from 1.35 ng to 54.15 ng per root system [40]. It’s a reasonable deduction that concentrations of DHA used in this study reflect the concentration of DHA in wheat root exudates. It was found that like other attractants for nematodes reported [16, 41], the response of H. avenae to DHA was concentration-dependent, because attraction levels of H. avenae to DHA with concentrations of 0.1 mg/L, 0.5 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L were different. Whether DHA plays roles in the orientations of plant for other nematodes remains unknown. In this study, the attractiveness of DHA and the full exudate solutions to H. avenae was not compared. It was speculated that higher attractive activity will be observed in the full exudate solutions. Taking together, our study increases the recognition to the orientation mechanism of H. avenae towards wheat roots, indicating the potential application of DHA, as an attractant to H. avenae, in the control of H. avenae through modifying the behavior of H. avenae around host roots.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Identification and quantitative analysis of low-molecular weight compounds in Bd21-3 root exudates.

^aNumbers indicated the percentages of each compounds’ content in the two samples. ^bQuantitative changes of each compounds after being heated were calculated using corresponding LM without heating as references. Values were means ± SE, n = 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Identification and quantitative analysis of low-molecular weight compounds in Zhengmai9023 root exudates.

^aNumbers indicated the percentages of each compounds’ content in the two samples. ^bQuantitative changes of each compounds after being heated were calculated using corresponding LM without heating as references. Values were means ± SE, n = 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Identification and quantitative analysis of low-molecular weight compounds in Heng4399 root exudates.

^aNumbers indicated the percentages of each compounds’ content in the two samples. ^bQuantitative changes of each compounds after being heated were calculated using corresponding LM without heating as references. Values were means ± SE, n = 3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236317.s003

(DOCX)

References

1. Smiley RW, Dababat AA, Iqbal S, Jones MGK, Maafi ZT, Peng DL, et al. Cereal cyst nematodes: A complex and destructive group of Heterodera species. Plant Dis. 2017; 101(10): 1692–1720. pmid:30676930
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Hilliard MA, Bargmann CI, Bazzicalupo P. C. elegans responds to chemical repellents by integrating sensory inputs from the head and the tail. Curr. biol. 2002; 12(9): 730–734. pmid:12007416
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Jones J. Nematode sense organs. In: Lee DL, editor. The biology of nematodes. New York: Taylor & Francis Inc; 2002; pp 369–387.
4. Rasmann S, Ali JG, Helder J, van der Putten WH. Ecology and evolution of soil nematode chemotaxis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012; 38(6): 615–628. pmid:22527058
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Riga E, Welacky T, Potter J, Anderson T, Topp E, Tenuta A. The impact of plant residues on the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2001; 23(2): 168–173.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Wesemael WML, Perry RN, Moens M. The influence of root diffusate and host age on hatching of the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M-fallax. Nematology. 2006; 8(6): 895–902.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Dennis PG, Miller AJ, Hirsch PR. Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010; 72(3): 313–327. pmid:20370828
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Huang XF, Chaparro JM, Reardon KF, Zhang R, Shen Q, Vivanco JM. Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities. Botany. 2014; 92(4): 267–275.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Bacetty AA, Snook ME, Glenn AE, Noe JP, Nagabhyru P, Bacon CW. Chemotaxis disruption in Pratylenchus scribneri by tall fescueroot extracts and alkaloids. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009; 35(7): 844–850. pmid:19575265
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Vos C, Claerhout S, Mkandawire R, Panis B, De Waele D, Elsen A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce root-knot nematode penetration through altered root exudation of their host. Plant Soil. 2012; 354(1–2): 335–345.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Yang GD, Zhou BL, Zhang XY, Zhang ZJ, Wu YY, Zhang YM, et al. Effects of tomato root exudates on Meloidogyne incognita. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(4): e0154675. pmid:27128659
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Huang WK, Ji HL, Gheysen G, Kyndt T. Thiamine-induced priming against root-knot nematode infection in rice involves lignification and hydrogen peroxide generation. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016; 17(4): 614–624. pmid:27103216
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Fudali SL, Wang C, Williamson VM. Ethylene signaling pathway modulates attractiveness of host roots to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013; 26(1): 75–86. pmid:22712507
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Hu YF, You J, Li CJ, Williamson VM, Wang CL. Ethylene response pathway modulates attractiveness of plant roots to soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 41282. pmid:28112257
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Warnock ND, Wilson L, Canet-Perez JV, Fleming T, Fleming CC, Maule AG, et al. Exogenous RNA interference exposes contrasting roles for sugar exudation in host-finding by plant pathogens. Int. J. Parasitol. 2016; 46: 473–477. pmid:27033013
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Hosoi A, Katsuyama T, Sasaki Y, Kondo T, Yajima S, Ito S. Nitrate analogs as attractants for soybean cyst nematode. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017; 81(8): 1542–1547. pmid:28593809
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Wang CL, Bruening G, Williamson VM. Determination of preferred pH for root-knot nematode aggregation using Pluronic F-127 gel. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009; 35(10): 1242–1251. pmid:19838866
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Devine KJ, Jones PW. Investigations into the chemoattraction of the potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida towards fractionated potato root leachate. Nematology. 2003; 5(1): 65–75.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Reynolds AM, Dutta TK, Curtis RHC, Powers SJ, Gaur HS, Kerry BR. Chemotaxis can take PPN to the source of a chemo-attractant via the shortest possible routes. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2011; 8(57): 568–577. pmid:20880854
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Xu Z, Zhao YQ, Yang DJ, Sun HJ, Zhang CL, Xie YP. Attractant and repellent effects of sweet potato root exudates on the potato rot nematode, Ditylenchus destructor. Nematology. 2015; 17(1): 117–124.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Qi YH, Meng L, Cao SF, Li MQ, Chen SL, Ye DY. Chemotaxis of Meloidogyne incognita in response to different salts. Agri. Sci. 2015; 6(9): 900–907.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Sikder MM, Vestergard M. Impacts of root metabolites on soil nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 10: 1792. pmid:32082349
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Wuyts N, Maung ZTZ, Swennen R, De Waele D. Banana rhizodeposition: characterization of root border cell production and effects on chemotaxis and motility of the parasitic nematode Radopholus similis. Plant Soil. 2006; 283(1–2): 217–228.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Viglierchio DR. Carbon dioxide sensing by Panagrellus silusiae and Ditylenchus dipsaci. Revue Nématol. 1990; 13(4): 425–432.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. McCallum ME, Dusenbery DB. Computer tracking as a behavioral GC detector: Nematode responses to vapor of host roots. J. Chem. Ecol. 1992; 18(4): 585–592. pmid:24253868
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Reinecke A, Muller F, Hilker M. Attractiveness of CO₂ released by root respiration fades on the background of root exudates. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 2008; 9(5): 568–576.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Wilschut RA, Silva JCP, Garbeva P, van der Putten WH. Belowground plant-herbivore interactions vary among climate-driven range-expanding plant species with different degrees of novel chemistry. Front. Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1861. pmid:29118781
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Papademetriou MK, Bone LW. Chemotaxis of larval soybean cyst nemaotde, Heterodera glycines race 3, to root leachates and ions. J. Chem. Ecol. 1983; 9(3): 387–396. pmid:24407407
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Ali JG, Alborn HT, Stelinski LL. Subterranean herbivore-induced volatiles released by citrus roots upon feeding by Diaprepes abbreviatus recruit entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010; 36(4): 361–368. pmid:20309617
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Ali JG, Alborn HT, Stelinski LL. Constitutive and induced subterranean plant volatiles attract both entomopathogenic and plant parasitic nematodes. J. Ecol. 2011; 99(1): 26–35.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Spiegel Y, Burrows PM, Bar-Eyal M. A chemo attractant in onion root exudates recognized by Ditylenchus dipsaci in laboratory bioassay. Phytopathology. 2003; 93(1): 127–132. pmid:18944166
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Kawasaki A, Donn S, Ryan PR, Mathesius U, Devilla R, Jones A, et al. Microbiome and exudates of the root and rhizosphere of Brachypodium distachyon, a model for wheat. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(10): e0164533. pmid:27727301
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Wu L, Ma FM, Liu C, Li YC, Wang CC, Wang AN. Comparative analysis of root exudates in soybean, corn, wheat and sorghum. Soyb. Sci. 2009; 28(6): 1021–1030.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Pan K, Xu LH, Wu FZ, Han Z, Chu LR, Qiu CF. Fungicidal effects of wheat root exudates on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp niveum. Allelopathy J. 2013; 32(2): 257–265.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Iannucci A, Fragasso M, Beleggia R, Nigro F, Papa R. Evolution of the crop rhizosphere: Impact of domestication on root exudates in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 2124. pmid:29326736
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Maglione M, Suttorp M, Tu W, Li Z, et al. Pharmacological and surgical treatment of obesity: Summary. In: AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 1998–2005. 2004; 103. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11899/.
37. Gandhi GR, Stalin A, Balakrishna K, Ignacimuthu S, Paulraj MG, Vishal R. Insulin sensitization via partial agonism of PPARgamma and glucose uptake through translocation and activation of GLUT4 in PI3K/p-Akt signaling pathway by embelin in type 2 diabetic rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013; 1830(1): 2243–2255. pmid:23104384
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Caruso MC, Daugherty MC, Moody SM, Falcone RA, Bierbrauer KS, Geis GL. Lessons learned from administration of high-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate for acute pediatric spinal cord injuries. J. Neurosurg-Pediatr. 2017; 20(6): 567–574. pmid:28984538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Mishra R, Jain SR, Kumar A. Microbial production of dihydroxyacetone. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008; 26(4): 293–303. pmid:18387770
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Wu HW, Haig T, Pratley J, Lemerle D, An M. Biochemical basis for wheat seedling allelopathy on the suppression of annual ryegrass (Lolium Rigidum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002; 50(16): 4567–4571. pmid:12137476
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Kirwa HK, Murungi LK, Beck JJ, Torto B. Elicitation of differential responses in the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita to tomato root exudate cytokinin, flavonoids, and alkaloids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018; 66(43): 11291–11300. pmid:30346752
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Smiley RW, Dababat AA, Iqbal S, Jones MGK, Maafi ZT, Peng DL, et al. Cereal cyst nematodes: A complex and destructive group of Heterodera species. Plant Dis. 2017; 101(10): 1692–1720. pmid:30676930
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Hilliard MA, Bargmann CI, Bazzicalupo P. C. elegans responds to chemical repellents by integrating sensory inputs from the head and the tail. Curr. biol. 2002; 12(9): 730–734. pmid:12007416
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Jones J. Nematode sense organs. In: Lee DL, editor. The biology of nematodes. New York: Taylor & Francis Inc; 2002; pp 369–387.

[ref4] 4. Rasmann S, Ali JG, Helder J, van der Putten WH. Ecology and evolution of soil nematode chemotaxis. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012; 38(6): 615–628. pmid:22527058
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Riga E, Welacky T, Potter J, Anderson T, Topp E, Tenuta A. The impact of plant residues on the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2001; 23(2): 168–173.
View Article
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Wesemael WML, Perry RN, Moens M. The influence of root diffusate and host age on hatching of the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M-fallax. Nematology. 2006; 8(6): 895–902.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Dennis PG, Miller AJ, Hirsch PR. Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010; 72(3): 313–327. pmid:20370828
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Huang XF, Chaparro JM, Reardon KF, Zhang R, Shen Q, Vivanco JM. Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities. Botany. 2014; 92(4): 267–275.
View Article
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Bacetty AA, Snook ME, Glenn AE, Noe JP, Nagabhyru P, Bacon CW. Chemotaxis disruption in Pratylenchus scribneri by tall fescueroot extracts and alkaloids. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009; 35(7): 844–850. pmid:19575265
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Vos C, Claerhout S, Mkandawire R, Panis B, De Waele D, Elsen A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce root-knot nematode penetration through altered root exudation of their host. Plant Soil. 2012; 354(1–2): 335–345.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Yang GD, Zhou BL, Zhang XY, Zhang ZJ, Wu YY, Zhang YM, et al. Effects of tomato root exudates on Meloidogyne incognita. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(4): e0154675. pmid:27128659
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Huang WK, Ji HL, Gheysen G, Kyndt T. Thiamine-induced priming against root-knot nematode infection in rice involves lignification and hydrogen peroxide generation. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016; 17(4): 614–624. pmid:27103216
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Fudali SL, Wang C, Williamson VM. Ethylene signaling pathway modulates attractiveness of host roots to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013; 26(1): 75–86. pmid:22712507
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Hu YF, You J, Li CJ, Williamson VM, Wang CL. Ethylene response pathway modulates attractiveness of plant roots to soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 41282. pmid:28112257
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Warnock ND, Wilson L, Canet-Perez JV, Fleming T, Fleming CC, Maule AG, et al. Exogenous RNA interference exposes contrasting roles for sugar exudation in host-finding by plant pathogens. Int. J. Parasitol. 2016; 46: 473–477. pmid:27033013
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Hosoi A, Katsuyama T, Sasaki Y, Kondo T, Yajima S, Ito S. Nitrate analogs as attractants for soybean cyst nematode. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017; 81(8): 1542–1547. pmid:28593809
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Wang CL, Bruening G, Williamson VM. Determination of preferred pH for root-knot nematode aggregation using Pluronic F-127 gel. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009; 35(10): 1242–1251. pmid:19838866
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Devine KJ, Jones PW. Investigations into the chemoattraction of the potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida towards fractionated potato root leachate. Nematology. 2003; 5(1): 65–75.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Reynolds AM, Dutta TK, Curtis RHC, Powers SJ, Gaur HS, Kerry BR. Chemotaxis can take PPN to the source of a chemo-attractant via the shortest possible routes. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2011; 8(57): 568–577. pmid:20880854
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Xu Z, Zhao YQ, Yang DJ, Sun HJ, Zhang CL, Xie YP. Attractant and repellent effects of sweet potato root exudates on the potato rot nematode, Ditylenchus destructor. Nematology. 2015; 17(1): 117–124.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Qi YH, Meng L, Cao SF, Li MQ, Chen SL, Ye DY. Chemotaxis of Meloidogyne incognita in response to different salts. Agri. Sci. 2015; 6(9): 900–907.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Sikder MM, Vestergard M. Impacts of root metabolites on soil nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 10: 1792. pmid:32082349
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Wuyts N, Maung ZTZ, Swennen R, De Waele D. Banana rhizodeposition: characterization of root border cell production and effects on chemotaxis and motility of the parasitic nematode Radopholus similis. Plant Soil. 2006; 283(1–2): 217–228.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Viglierchio DR. Carbon dioxide sensing by Panagrellus silusiae and Ditylenchus dipsaci. Revue Nématol. 1990; 13(4): 425–432.
View Article
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. McCallum ME, Dusenbery DB. Computer tracking as a behavioral GC detector: Nematode responses to vapor of host roots. J. Chem. Ecol. 1992; 18(4): 585–592. pmid:24253868
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Reinecke A, Muller F, Hilker M. Attractiveness of CO₂ released by root respiration fades on the background of root exudates. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 2008; 9(5): 568–576.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Wilschut RA, Silva JCP, Garbeva P, van der Putten WH. Belowground plant-herbivore interactions vary among climate-driven range-expanding plant species with different degrees of novel chemistry. Front. Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1861. pmid:29118781
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Papademetriou MK, Bone LW. Chemotaxis of larval soybean cyst nemaotde, Heterodera glycines race 3, to root leachates and ions. J. Chem. Ecol. 1983; 9(3): 387–396. pmid:24407407
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Ali JG, Alborn HT, Stelinski LL. Subterranean herbivore-induced volatiles released by citrus roots upon feeding by Diaprepes abbreviatus recruit entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010; 36(4): 361–368. pmid:20309617
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Ali JG, Alborn HT, Stelinski LL. Constitutive and induced subterranean plant volatiles attract both entomopathogenic and plant parasitic nematodes. J. Ecol. 2011; 99(1): 26–35.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Spiegel Y, Burrows PM, Bar-Eyal M. A chemo attractant in onion root exudates recognized by Ditylenchus dipsaci in laboratory bioassay. Phytopathology. 2003; 93(1): 127–132. pmid:18944166
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Kawasaki A, Donn S, Ryan PR, Mathesius U, Devilla R, Jones A, et al. Microbiome and exudates of the root and rhizosphere of Brachypodium distachyon, a model for wheat. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(10): e0164533. pmid:27727301
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Wu L, Ma FM, Liu C, Li YC, Wang CC, Wang AN. Comparative analysis of root exudates in soybean, corn, wheat and sorghum. Soyb. Sci. 2009; 28(6): 1021–1030.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Pan K, Xu LH, Wu FZ, Han Z, Chu LR, Qiu CF. Fungicidal effects of wheat root exudates on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp niveum. Allelopathy J. 2013; 32(2): 257–265.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Iannucci A, Fragasso M, Beleggia R, Nigro F, Papa R. Evolution of the crop rhizosphere: Impact of domestication on root exudates in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 2124. pmid:29326736
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Maglione M, Suttorp M, Tu W, Li Z, et al. Pharmacological and surgical treatment of obesity: Summary. In: AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 1998–2005. 2004; 103. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11899/.

[ref37] 37. Gandhi GR, Stalin A, Balakrishna K, Ignacimuthu S, Paulraj MG, Vishal R. Insulin sensitization via partial agonism of PPARgamma and glucose uptake through translocation and activation of GLUT4 in PI3K/p-Akt signaling pathway by embelin in type 2 diabetic rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013; 1830(1): 2243–2255. pmid:23104384
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Caruso MC, Daugherty MC, Moody SM, Falcone RA, Bierbrauer KS, Geis GL. Lessons learned from administration of high-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate for acute pediatric spinal cord injuries. J. Neurosurg-Pediatr. 2017; 20(6): 567–574. pmid:28984538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Mishra R, Jain SR, Kumar A. Microbial production of dihydroxyacetone. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008; 26(4): 293–303. pmid:18387770
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Wu HW, Haig T, Pratley J, Lemerle D, An M. Biochemical basis for wheat seedling allelopathy on the suppression of annual ryegrass (Lolium Rigidum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002; 50(16): 4567–4571. pmid:12137476
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Kirwa HK, Murungi LK, Beck JJ, Torto B. Elicitation of differential responses in the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita to tomato root exudate cytokinin, flavonoids, and alkaloids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018; 66(43): 11291–11300. pmid:30346752
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

Dihydroxyacetone of wheat root exudates serves as an attractant for Heterodera avenae

Dihydroxyacetone of wheat root exudates serves as an attractant for Heterodera avenae

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Nematode culture and isolation

Preparations of root exudates

Chemotaxis assay

HPLC-MS assay

Statistical analysis

Results

Attractions of H. avenae to root exudates from eight different plant varieties were characterized

Attractants of root exudates tested for H. avenae were heat-labile and low molecular compounds

Four putative attractants for H. avenae were identified in root exudates

DHA validation as an attractant for H. avenae

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Identification and quantitative analysis of low-molecular weight compounds in Bd21-3 root exudates.

S2 Table. Identification and quantitative analysis of low-molecular weight compounds in Zhengmai9023 root exudates.

S3 Table. Identification and quantitative analysis of low-molecular weight compounds in Heng4399 root exudates.

References