Rapid and sensitive electrochemical sensor of cross-linked polyaniline/oxidized carbon nanomaterials core-shell nanocomposites for determination of 2,4-dichlorophenol

Dina F. Katowah; Gharam I. Mohammed; Dyab A. Al-Eryani; Tariq R. Sobahi; Mahmoud A. Hussein

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234815

Abstract

Nanocomposites (NCs) of crosslinked polyaniline (CPA)-coated oxidized carbon nanomaterials (OXCNMs) were fabricated as a very sensitive and simple electrochemical sensor to be utilized in 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCPH) detection. CPA/OXCNMs NCs were prepared by chemical copolymerization of polyaniline with triphenylamine and p-phenylenediamine in the presence of OXCNMs. The CPA/GO-OXSWCNTNCs exhibited a higher affinity for the oxidation of chlorophenols compared to the glassy carbon electrode (GCE), CPA/GCE, and other NCs. Cyclic voltammetry was performed to investigate and assess the electrocatalytic oxidation of 2,4-DCPH on the modified GCE. The compound yielded a well-defined voltammetric response in a Britton-Robinson buffer (pH 5) at 0.54 V (vs. silver chloride electrode). Quantitative determination of 2,4-DCPH was performed by differential pulse voltammetry under optimal conditions in the concentration range of 0.05 to 1.2 nmol L^-1, and a linear calibration graph was obtained. The detection limit (S/N = 3) was found to be 4.2 nmol L^-1. In addition, the results demonstrated that the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE sensor exhibited a strong anti-interference ability, reproducibility, and stability. The prepared CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE sensor was used to rapidly detect 2,4-DCPH with a high degree of sensitivity in fish farm water with proven levels of satisfactory recoveries.

Citation: Katowah DF, Mohammed GI, Al-Eryani DA, Sobahi TR, Hussein MA (2020) Rapid and sensitive electrochemical sensor of cross-linked polyaniline/oxidized carbon nanomaterials core-shell nanocomposites for determination of 2,4-dichlorophenol. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0234815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815

Editor: Zafar Ghouri, Texas A&M University at Qatar, QATAR

Received: March 24, 2020; Accepted: June 2, 2020; Published: June 25, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Katowah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: NO fund received.

Competing interests: NO authors have competing interests.

Abbreviations: 2,4-DCP, 2,4-Dichlorophenol; 2-CP, 2-Chlorophenol; 4-CP, 4-Chlorophenol; Ani, Aniline; APS, Ammonium persulfate; CDT_final, The final composite degradation temperature; CP, Conducting polymer; CPA, Crosslinked polyaniline; CPHs, Chlorophenols; CV, Cyclic voltammetry; DMF, Dimethylformamide; DPV, Differential pulse voltammetry; DTG, Derivative thermogravimetry; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; GCE, Glassy carbon electrode; GO, Graphene oxide; H₂SO₄, Sulphuric acid; HCl, Hydrochloric acid; HNO₃, Nitric acid; HR-TEM, High-resolution transmission electron microscope; NCs, Nanocomposites; NPs, Nanoparticles; o-PDA, o-Phenylenediamine; OXCNMs, Oxidized carbon nanomaterials; OXMWCNTs, Oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes; OXSWCNTs, Oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes; PANI, Polyaniline; PDT_max, The maximum polymer degradation temperature; PPDA, p-phenylenediamine; RSDs, Relative standard deviations; SEM, Scanning electron microscopy; T₁₀, Temperatures corresponding to the decomposition of 10% weight loss; T₂₅, Temperatures corresponding to the decomposition of 25% weight loss; T₅₀, Temperatures corresponding to the decomposition of 50% weight loss; TGA, Thermogravimetric analysis; TPA, triphenylamine

1. Introduction

2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCPH)is a chlorophenol compound that is typically used in herbicides, pharmaceuticals, fungicides, and insect repellents. [1]. However, due to its toxicity, it can be damaging to the environment. In addition, there are several adverse health effects associated with 2,4-DCPH inhalation, such as respiratory infection and liver and kidney damage [2]. Several methods have been utilized to detect 2,4-DCPHincluding spectrofluorimetry [3, 4], electrochemiluminescence [5], spectrophotometry [6], chromatography [7, 8], and electrophoresis [9]. However, these methods are time-consuming and require sample pretreatment. Thus, electrochemical techniques [10–12] have been developed owing to their high sensitivity, simplicity, and inexpensive instrumentation. Consequently, using these techniques, it is possible to create a quick and effective method for detecting 2,4-DCPH in environmental samples.

Carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) have a promising potential for electrochemical applications, such as 2,4-DCPH sensors, as they exhibit high electrical conductivity and large surface areas, while possessing efficient electrocatalytic behavior. In addition, conducting polymer (CP)-based sensors have several advantages including simplicity, ability to process environmental samples, high electrical conductivity, mechanical flexibility, and low cost [13]. Polyaniline (PANI) is a particularly promising CP due to its excellent chemical stability, high electrical conductivity, ease of preparation, low cost, and high yield [14]. Due to its molecular self-assembly, PANI usually forms supramolecular nanofibers with a high surface-to-volume ratio and unique properties, which make it useful in a diverse range of applications. Within the literature, several PANI nanostructures (e.g., nanotubes, nanofibers, and nanospheres) have been prepared using a variety of synthetic techniques [15–18] which has further expanded PANI’s functionality by providing effective designs and improving efficiency. Experimentally, it has been shown that the synergy between individual components improves the features of the NCs, which expands their scope of application [19]. The development of PANI nanostructures and their NCs has introduced a significant potential for the development and optimization of many applications and processes.

Crosslinking can enhance the electrochemical properties of CPs. Consequently, in this study, a chemical in situ polymerization crosslinking method was utilized for the first time in applications to enhance the electrochemical properties of PANI by introducing various types of oxidized carbon nanomaterials (OXCNMs)[graphene oxide (GO), oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes (OXSWCNTs), oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (OXMWCNTs), (GO-OXSWCNTs), and (GO-OXMWCNTs)] into conjugated crosslinked PANI(CPA). The surface modification of CNMs with carboxylic acid functional groups resulted in noticeable improvements in its characteristics, such as dispersion in the monomer solution. Subsequently, this enhanced the interactions between the matrix and OXCNMs, and increased their conductivity. Therefore, the prepared core-shell NCs combined the advantages of each component which resulted in the development of NCs with electronic conductivity improvements. This led to an electrochemical sensor with considerable selectivity and sensitivity for 2,4-DCPH (kindly refer to the graphical abstract associated with this submission).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Aniline (ANI) was procured from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co.(China), and ammonium persulfate (APS) was procured from Across Organics (Belgium).p-phenylenediamine (PPDA) was purchased from PDH and used without further purification(UK). Triphenylamine (TPA) was procured from Janssen Chimica (Belgium). 2,4-DCPH was obtained from Aladdin Chemistry Co. (Shanghai, China). Phenol (BDH) was purchased from Analar Limited (UK). 2-chlorophenol (2-CP), o-phenylenediamine (o-PDA), and 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) were procured from BDH laboratory reagents(UK). Ethanol, dimethylformamide (DMF), sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), and nitric acid (HNO₃) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich(USA). Graphene, SWCNTs, and MWCNTs were procured from the XFNANOA dvanced Materials Supplier Inc. (China). Additionally, analytical-grade chemicals were used in the experiments as received. Ultrapure, distilled, and deionized water (DI water)were used throughout the experiments. A series of Britton-Robinson (B-R) buffers (pH 2–11) were synthesized according to a previously reported method [20]. Glassware, bottles, and other instruments were pre-cleaned with chromic acid (H₂CrO₄), washed with B-R buffer(10%, v/v) and acetone, and rinsed with distilled water.

2.2. Instrumentation

The degree of crystallinity of the samples was characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD, D8, Bruker). The morphologies of the prepared materials were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta 250 FEG, Thermo Fisher) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermal gravimetry (DTG) tests were carried out to assess the thermal stability of the NC materials. It was also necessary to standardize their degradation temperature. Therefore, analysis was conducted on a TGA-50 system at a heating rate of 10 °Cmin^-1 in air. The functional group information of the samples was obtained by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR,JASCO). Raman spectroscopy was recorded on a Lab RAM-HR(Evolution Horiba Co.). Electrochemical measurements were carried out using a Metrohm 757 VA trace analyzer and a 747 VA stand (Switzerland). A three-compartment borosilicate (Metrohm) voltammetric electrochemical cell (100 mL) configuration incorporated a modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE, Φ = 3 mm) as the working electrode, a silver chloride electrode (AgCl/Ag) as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire as the counter electrode. Ultrapure water (Milli-Q Plus, Millipore) was used for the preparation of all solutions. Digital micropipettes [0.5–10 μL (Joan-Lab), 10–100 μL and 100–1000 μL (Plus-Sed)] were used. Solution pH values were measured using a pH meter (inoLap pH/ion level 2).

2.3. Synthesis of OXCNMs

2.3.1. Synthesis of GO.

GO was synthesized as described by the modified Hummers’ method [21].

2.3.2. Synthesis of OXSWCNTs and OXMWCNTs.

OXSWCNTs were carefully prepared in accordance with a method outlined within the literature [22]. SWCNTs (100 mg) were dispersed in a mixture (1:3, v/v) of HNO₃)70%(and H₂SO₄(96%)and ultrasonicated for 4 h. Next, the suspension was refluxed for 2 h in an oil bath at 80°C under stirring. The resulting OXSWCNTs were diluted with DI water until the washing solution gave a pH > 5, then they were filtered and dried in an oven at 60°C. OXMWCNTs were prepared by the same process using MWCNTs.

2.3.3. Synthesis of GO-OXSWCNTs and GO-OXMWCNTs.

To prepare GO-OXSWCNTs, OXSWCNT powder was added to 25 mL of GO dispersion in DI water ata mass ratio of 1:1 and sonicated for 2 h. The obtained dispersion was filtered and dried at 100°C for 24 h. GO-OXMWCNTs were prepared by the same process using OXMWCNTs.

2.4. Synthesis of CPA and CPA/OXCNM NCs

The chemical copolymerization of CPA with various OXCNMs was carried out using the following method. First,5%OXCNMs were added to 120 mL of 0.5 M H₂SO₄ within a three-neck flask (250 mL) and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 2 hat room temperature. Then, 1.8626 mL of doubly distilled ANI, 0.043256 g of PPDA, and 0.049064 g of TPA were added to the flask and the mixture was ultrasonicated for approximately 30 min. The solution was then continuously stirred and cooled to 0–4°C in an ice bath. Then, 5 g of a pre-cooled APS solution (dissolved in 40 mL of 0.5 M H₂SO₄) was added dropwise to the solution over approximately 30 min under a nitrogen atmosphere with constant stirring at 0–4°C. Polymerization was continued for 24 h under a nitrogen atmosphere while the solution was stirred constantly at 0–4°C. The obtained precipitate was then collected by ultracentrifugation and washed using DI water repeatedly until the resulting filtrate became colorless. Finally, the fine black powder was dried at 60°C for 24 h. This preparation procedure was repeated five times at fixed loadings of various OXCNMs (GO, OXSWCNTs, OXMWCNTs, GO-OXSWCNTs, and GO-OXMWCNTs). For comparison, pure CPA was synthesized by the same method without OXCNM [18]. The abbreviations for the prepared CPANCs are defined as CPA/GO, CPA/OXSWCNTs, CPA/OXMWCNTs, CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs, and CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs.

2.5. Fabrication of the working electrode

To fabricate the working electrode, the GCE was first polished to a mirror finish with a 0.05 μm alumina slurry in ultrapure water using a smooth polishing material and applying circular movements for a few minutes. The surface was then washed with ultrapure water and sonicated in HNO₃ (10%, v/v), ethanol, and ultrapure water for 1, 2, and 3 min, respectively. The formation of a GCE modified with NCs was achieved using drop-coating, where 10 mg of the NCs were dispersed in 5 mL of DMF [23]. Then, high-frequency ultrasonication was used to prepare homogeneous NC suspensions. A total of 6 μL of NC suspension was dropped onto the GCE and on the surface of bare GCE, followed by vacuum drying at 50°C for 15 min [24].

2.6. Electrochemical measurements

Nitric acid (10%,v/v) and ethanol were utilized to clean the electrochemical cell which was later washed with ultrapure water. All electrochemical experiments were performed at room temperature. Voltammetric measurements were performed in a 10mL electrochemical cell containing 2,4-DCPH (1.0 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹) as the target analyte and B-R buffer (pH 5) as the supporting electrolyte. Cyclic voltammograms between -0.50 and 1.2 V were measured at a scan rate of 50 mV s^-1. The voltammetric cell and test solution were purged with nitrogen and stirred for 15 min. After 10 s of equilibration, the background voltammogram of the supporting electrolyte was recorded by applying a potential scan from -0.5 to 1.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl at 0.05s modulation time, 0.5s interval time, 0.00195V step potential, 0.07995V modulation potential, and -1.0V standby potential. Under the same experimental conditions, the effect of the sweep rate (ν = 0.02.0.16 V s⁻¹) on the cyclic voltammograms of 2,4-DCPH(1.0 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹) at pH 5 was determined. The 3-electrode system was immersed in a blank solution after each measurement. Then, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) scan was repeated 20 times to renew the electrode.

2.7. Water sample preparation and analysis

Water samples collected from a fish farm basin (Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) were stored at 5°C. Before analysis, the water samples were filtered through a 0.50μmmembrane filter and transferred to volumetric flasks filled with ultrapure water. A required quantity of the water samples was diluted with a B-R (pH 5.0) buffer up to 10 mL for electrochemical measurements. The differential pulse voltammetry(DPV)signals were recorded under optimum conditions after deaeration with nitrogen.

2.8. Ethics statement

In this research work, no permits were required to perform. We are a university staff and doing our research work in the university laboratories. Therefore we have no permission to do any regular experiments. In addition our research has no any medical treatments or no deal with animals.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization

Fig 1 shows the XRD diffraction patterns of CPA and as-prepared CPA-OXCNM NCs. The CPA exhibited two main reflections located at 2θ = 20.4 and 25.4°, which is in agreement with the reflection angles obtained in previous studies of CPA [25]. Typically, the patterns of all CPA-OXCNM NCs exhibit the same behavior and they have similar diffraction peaks as those of pure CPA. However, the peaks appear sharper and more intense, suggesting that NCs are more crystalline and the polymer chains in the NCs have an ordered structure. The presence of a crystalline peak in all NCs at approximately 26° with a higher intensity is due to the overlapping peaks of CPA and graphitic materials in the OXCNMs. Consequently, this enhances long-range conjugation and improves π-π inter chain stacking [26, 27]. In addition, the appearance of these peaks indicates the formation of the core-shell structure of the CPA-OXCNMs, as evidenced by the SEM image.

Download:

Fig 1. XRD patterns of CPA and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g001

Fig 2 shows the FTIR spectra of CPA, which is in agreement with previous results from the literature [25]. The peak at approximately 1580 cm^-1 is due to C = C stretching vibrations of the quinonoid rings, while the peak at approximately1483 cm^-1 is ascribed to C = C stretching vibrations of the benzenoid units. The stretching mode of C–N, which belongs to aromatic amine, is observed at 1306 and 1240 cm^-1. The strongest peak at approximately 1111 cm^-1 is a characteristic peak of the doped structure; this strong peak occurs due to the high doping level, which increases conductivity [28, 29]. The peak attributed to the out-of-plane C–H bending vibration in the 1,4-disubstituted rings is located at 800 cm^-1 [30]. The peak centered at 1645 cm^-1 is related to the stretching vibration of aromatic rings; it is prominent because of the increase in the content of benzenoid as a result of the copolymerization of TPA as well as PPDA [31]. The stretching mode of N–H in CPA is located at 3450 cm^-1. The spectra of the NCs show some differences when compared to those of CPA. In the spectra of the NCs, the intensities of the peaks decreased, indicating an interaction between CPA chains and OXCNM surfaces [32]. The peak at 1111 cm^-1, which is attributed to the doped CPA, is a measure of the degree of delocalization of electrons [33]. Thus, it is the characteristic peak of the CPA electrical conductivity. The intensity of this peak increased with the introduction of the OXCNMs, and the peak was slightly shifted. This finding supports the existence of strong interactions between the π-bonded structure of the OXCNMs and the conjugated structure of CPA [34, 35], and the shift is caused by the electrostatic interactions between CPA and OXCNTs. This shift is similar to that observed in the Raman spectra and the XRD pattern of the NCs (Fig 1), where the peak at 26° in the NCs was tapered and more intense compared to that of CPA. The intensity of this peak was the highest for the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs compared with those of other NCs, which confirms its high conductivity. This result is in good agreement with the measured increased electrical conductivity.

Download:

Fig 2. FTIR of CPA and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g002

Surface morphology is a crucial factor that affects the electrochemical performance of electrode materials in sensors. Fig 3 shows SEM images of pure CPA and CPA/OXCNM NCs with various OXCNM contents. The CPA sample exhibited a nanorod-like morphology, as shown in Fig 3a. For CPA/OXCNM NCs, during in situ polymerization, OXCNMs served as templates and CPA nanorods evenly grew on their surfaces via electrostatic interactions, π-π electron interactions, and hydrogen bonding between OXCNMs and CPA chains as well as between CPA chains. These interactions produced well-aligned nanorod core-shell structures, as shown in Fig 3b–3f with large surface areas, which may enhance electrical conductivity when these structures are used as electrode materials [36, 37]. For CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs and CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs, the increase in their conductivity is attributed to the mixture of GO-OXSWCNTS and GO-OXMWCNTs, respectively. The presence of these materials yields highly interconnected networks in both NCs. This, in turn, offers fast electron charge transportation paths. Thus, the ionic mobility and diffusion pathways are improved, which increases the electrical conductivity.

Download:

Fig 3. SEM images of CPA (a), CPA/GO (b), CPA/OXSWCNTs (c), CPA/OXMWCNTs (d), CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs (e) and CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs (f).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g003

The HR-TEM images of CPA and NCs show regular nanorod-like morphology [Fig 4a–4f and 4c–4f] with both types of CNTs. It is clear that the thickness of the CNTs increased due to the formation of the core-shell nanostructure of CPA-coated CNTs. No GO was observed in the CPA/GO, CPA/GO-SWCNTs, and CPA/GO-MWCNT NCs, as shown in Fig 4b, 4e and 4f, respectively. It can be concluded that the CPA covered the GO completely. GO may serve as a substrate to support CPA-coated OXCNTs during polymerization in both CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs and CPA/GO-OXSWCNT NCs. This yields an increased surface area, and therefore increased electrical conductivity of the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs and CPA/GO-OXSWCNT NCs compared with that of other NCs (confirmed from the thickness of NCs by SEM and HR-TEM).

Download:

Fig 4. TEM images of CPA (a), CPA/GO (b), CPA/OXSWCNTs (c), CPA/OXMWCNTs (d), CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs (e) and CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs (f).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g004

Raman spectroscopy was used to confirm the existence of OXCNMs side-by-side with CPA in the NCs. Fig 5a and 5b show the Raman spectra of OXCNMs and CPA/OXCNM NCs, respectively. The characteristic peaks of D and G of the OXCNMs appear in the Raman spectra of the NCs. The G band represents the in-plane stretching E_2g mode, whereas the D band is disorder-induced, for example, by sp³-hybridized carbon atoms [38]. Fig 5a shows the Raman spectrum of the GO nanoparticles (NPs). The characteristic features in the Raman spectrum of the GO NPs are the D and G bands, which are centered at approximately 1342and 1592 cm^-1, respectively. The characteristic peaks of D and G for the GO NPs are present in the Raman spectrum of the CPA/GO NCs. The D and G bands of the CPA/GO NCs are slightly shifted compared with those of the GO NPs and appear at 1380 and 1554 cm^-1, respectively. Fig 5b shows the spectrum of pure OXSWCNTs, which has a strong G band at 1571 cm⁻¹ and a D band at 1340 cm⁻¹. However, the G band of OXSWCNT at 1571 cm⁻¹ was shifted to lower values (i.e., to 1543 cm⁻¹ for CPA/OXSWCNTs), whereas the D band shifted from 1340 to 1375 cm^-1.

Download:

Fig 5. (a and b) RAMAN of OXCNTs and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g005

The Raman spectrum of the OXMWCNTs is shown in Fig 5c, where the D and G bands were observed at 1342 and 1578 cm^-1, respectively. However, the D and G bands for the OXMWCNTs were shifted from 1342 to 1373 cm^-1 and from 1578 to 1543 cm⁻¹, respectively, for the CPA/OXMWCNTs. The spectrum for the GO-OXSWCNTs [Fig 5d] demonstrates that the D and G bands are centered at 1343 and 1579 cm^-1, respectively. The characteristic G peak of the GO-OXSWCNTs at 1579 cm^-1 is present in the Raman spectrum of the CPA/GO-OXSWCNT NCs. The G band of the CPA/GO-OXSWCNT NCs is slightly shifted compared with the GO-OXSWCNTs and appears at 1571 cm^-1, whereas the D band at 1343 cm^-1 is shifted to 1378 cm^-1. Similarly, the GO-OXMWCNTs spectrum [Fig 5e] shows the D and G bands at 1343 and 1568 cm^-1, respectively. The characteristic G peaks of GO-OXMWCNTs at 1568 cm^-1 are present in the Raman spectrum of the CPA/GO-OXMWCNT NCs, but the G band is slightly shifted and appears at 1571 cm^-1. The D band is also shifted from 1343 to 1349 cm^-1. The values of the G and D bands of the NCs are summarized in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. The values of G, D band and ID/IG ratio of OXCNMs and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.t001

The shifting of the G band in the Raman spectra for all of the NCs indicates that a strong interaction characterized by charge transfer occurs between the OXCNMs and CPA. The broadening of the G band of the CPA/OXCNM NCs may be due to the coating of amorphous CPA which forms on the OXCNMs during synthesis [39, 40]. This is further supported by the thicker coating of CPA on the OXCNMs, as confirmed by SEM. The intensity ratio (I_D/I_G) of the D and G bands is an important parameter for measuring the degree of graphitization in the material. The difference in the given intensity ratio of the pristine OXCNMs and NCs is a good indicator of the relative degree of defects in the OXCNMs. If both bands have similar intensities, a high level of structural defects may be present in the OXCNM lattice [41]. As shown in Table 1, the intensity ratios of all the NCs were greater than the OXCNMs, which demonstrates that no defects were created in the OXCNM lattice.

The CPA and CPA/OXCNM NC samples were characterized by TGA and DTG to examine their thermal stability and weight loss. Fig 6 and S1 Fig show the TGA curves for all samples as a function of temperature together with the DTG curves. The weight loss of CPA observed in the TGA curves occurred in three steps, which agreed with the literature [25]. The first step of weight loss (14.1 wt.%) started at 50–140°C and was caused by the evaporation of moisture. The second step of weight loss (5.7 wt.%) occurred at 150–240°C and was attributed to the removal of doping anions. In addition, it may also be attributed to the rapid degradation of poly(p-phenylenediamine) [42] through the homopolymerization of PPDA during copolymerization crosslinking. The weight loss in the third step occurred at 240–640°C and was mainly attributed to the decomposition of the polymer chains. Complete decomposition of CPA was observed at 591°C. The CPA/OXCNM NCs show a behavior similar to that of CPA, which suggests that these samples exhibit a similar degradation process, as shown in Fig 6.

Download:

Fig 6. TGA curves of CPA and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g006

In Table 2, the notationsT₁₀, T₂₅, and T₅₀ representthe decomposition temperatures which correspond to 10, 25, and 50% weight loss, respectively. The T₁₀, T₂₅, and T₅₀ values for the CPA/GO NCs were 111, 314, and 414°C, respectively. This signifies that, compared with the other samples, the CPA/GO NCs had the highest thermal stability and residual mass retention. The final composite degradation temperature (CDT_final)is defined as the temperature at which decomposition finishes [43]. The values of CDT_final obtained from the TGA curves are displayed in Table 2, and exhibit that the CDT_final of the CPA/GO NCs is higher than that of the other samples. The maximum polymer degradation temperature (PDT_max) [44] values were determined for all samples, and the values are shown in Table 2. The results in Table 2 also demonstrate that the interactions between CPA and the mixture of GO-OXSWCNTS have the highest value compared to the other NCs. This may potentially be due to the presence of OXSWCNTs in the GO-OXSWCNTS mixture.

Download:

Table 2. Thermal behaviour of CPA and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.t002

Given the aforementioned analysis, a scheme for the fabrication of novel CPA/OXCNM NCs is presented to highlight the synthesis method of the NCs (Fig 7). Facile chemical oxidative polymerization was applied to prepare the CPA/OXCNM NCs in the presence of OXCNMs in an acidic medium; TPA was used as a crosslinker in the polymerization of ANI with PPDA. In an acidic environment, the groups of -COOH on the surface of the OXCNMs tend to become protonated, indicating a potential gain in H⁺ from the acidic medium [45]. Thus, several SO₄²⁻ions compensate for the positive charges on the surface of the OXCNMs by adsorption. In addition, extra adsorption of SO₄²⁻ on the surface of the OXCNMs acts as a charge compensator for positively charged CPA chains during the formation of the CPA/OXCNM NCs in this charge compensation system. ANI, PPDA, and TPA were oxidized by APS into cationic radicals under acidic environments. The polymerization of the cationic radicals of ANI and PPDA create linear poly(ANI-PPDA) oligomers with two amino groups in the terminal. After oxidation, the cationic radicals of the linear poly(ANI-PPDA) oligomer continue to react with cationic radicals of TPA to form a CPA network. The polymerization occurs equally in the three para-positions because of the identical reaction activity of the three para-positions of N in TPA. Electrostatic interactions occur between cationic radicals and anions absorbed on the surface of the OXCNMs. Furthermore, we propose that two types of hydrogen bonding occur: bonding between CPA chains and oxygen atoms on the surface of OXCNMs and hydrogen bonding between CPA chains in the CPA/OXCNM NCs. Additionally, π–π bonding between the aromatic rings of CPA and the π bonds of OXCNMs also occurs. These interactions confirm that OXCNMs are inserted into CPA chains and produce core-shell structures. These interactions generate conducting bridges that facilitate higher charge transfer between the quinoid ring of CPA and the OXCNMs, which enhances the electrical conductivity of the NCs [25, 46–50].

Download:

Fig 7. Illustration of the fabrication procedure of core-shell PAC/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g007

3.2. Electrochemical characterization of modified electrodes

CV used ferricyanide as a redox probe to measure the surface status as well as the barrier of the modified electrodes, and the corresponding cyclic voltammograms are shown in Fig 8. A clear well-defined reversible redox peak was observed in the CV curve of the bare GCE because of the [Fe(CN)₆]^3−/4− electron transfer process. When the GCE was modified with CPA, a sharp decrease in peak currents was observed. This occurred because CPA has poor conductivity compared to other samples, which hinders electron transfer. CPA/GO, CPA/OXMWCNT, and CPA/OXSWCNT electrodes reported a small increase in peak currents. For CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs, the redox peak currents of [Fe(CN)₆]^3−/4− were considerably improved. This is because the CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs have a large specific surface area, and subsequently a high electrical conductivity, which increases the concentration of [Fe(CN)₆]^3−/4− on the electrode surface and promotes a high electron transfer rate. For CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs, the currents were further increased, which indicates a synergistic effect between the CPA and GO-OXSWCNTs. This improves the electron transfer of [Fe(CN)₆]^3−/4− on the surface of the electrode.

Download:

Fig 8. The CV curves for bare GC electrode, CPA/GC and CPA/OXCNMs/GC electrode in 0.1 M KCl solution containing 5.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]^3-/4- with the scan rate of 50 mVs^-1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g008

3.3. Electrochemical performance of the modified electrodes in detecting2,4-DCPH

The sensing performance of the prepared modified electrodes for 2,4-DCPH was evaluated by CV. Fig 9 displays the voltammetric responses of 2,4-DCPH (1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L^-1) in B-R buffer (pH 5.0) at different electrodes. A weak oxidation peak at 0.58 V with a small peak current of 3.92 μA was observed for the bare GCE. The CPA/GCE and CPA/GO/GCE had slightly higher oxidation currents (11.7 and 13.5 μA, respectively) and a marginally lower potential (0.56 V) compared to the bare GCE. The CPA/OXMWCNTs/GCE and CPA/OXSWCNTs/GCE exhibited the lowest oxidation peak currents (9.5 and 7.4 μA, respectively) at 0.55 V. The CPA/GO-OXMWCNTs and CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs, where the films accelerate 2,4-DCPH oxidation, experienced the highest peak currents by a significant margin (18.9 and 20.6 μA, respectively) at 0.57 V. The superior electrochemical performance of the CPA/GO-OXMWCNT and CPA/GO-OXSWCNT composites may be due to their high conductivity and specific surface area.

Download:

Fig 9. CVs of 0.1 mM 2,4-DCP at GCE, CPA/GC and CPA/OXCNMs/GC in B-R (pH = 5.0) with the scan rate of 50 mVs^-1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g009

3.4. Cyclic voltammetric behavior

CV is frequently utilized to obtain qualitative information on electrochemical reactions. Fig 10 shows the CV responses of the CPA/GO/OXSWCNTs/GCE when exposed to2,4-DCPH (1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L^-1) in the B-R buffer(pH5) at various scan rates (20–160 mVs^-1). The CV responses show a well-defined oxidation peak at the potential Epa = 0.54 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode, which can be attributed to the oxidation of 2,4-DCPH to O-benzoquinone [51]. In the reverse scan, no cathodic peak was observed in the tested potential window, which confirms the irreversible nature of the electrochemical oxidation process. However, by increasing the scan rate, the anodic peak current steadily increased, which suggests a low chemical reaction and a limited mass transfer after the electrochemical process [52, 53]. The relationship between the anodic peak current (Ipa) and the square root of the sweep rate (ν) is shown in S2 Fig. Moreover, the linear regression equation can be stated as: (1)

Download:

Fig 10. CV response of 1 ×10⁻⁴ mol L^-1 2,4-DCP at CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE with different scan rates from 20 to 160 in B–R buffer (pH 5.0).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g010

The current increased linearly with increasing scan rate, which shows that the oxidation process is controlled by diffusion [54, 55]. In addition, the effect of scan rate on the oxidation peak potential (Epa) was used to calculate the kinetic parameters, as shown in S3 Fig. The Epa increased with increasing scan rate, and there was a linear relationship between the Epa and ln v. The equation of linear regression is: (2) as reported by Laviron’s theory [52]. The Laviron equation can be used to describe the Epa of the irreversible electrode process: (3)

Based on this equation and given the slope of the linear plots of Epa of the anodic steps vs. lnν, the value of RT/(1-α) nF could be calculated. The value is presumed to be 0.5 for an absolutely irreversible electrode system [56]. Using T = 298 K, R = 8.314 J K^-1 mol^-1, F = 96480 C, and the value of the slope = 0.0281 (S3 Fig), the electron transmission number (n) for the oxidation of 2,4-DCPHwas calculated to be approximately 2. As such, the oxidation process of 2,4-DCPH on the CPA/GO/OXSWCNTs/GCE is a two-proton and two-electron process. Fig 11 shows the reaction process of 2,4-DCPH on this electrode.

Download:

Fig 11. Oxidation mechanism of 2,4-DCP on modified electrode.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g011

3.5. Optimization of analytical parameters

The impact of pH on the current of the oxidation peak of 2,4-DCPH (1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹)for the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE was considered to be an important factor. Therefore, by utilizing CV, the influence of pH was investigated in the range of pH 3.0–9.0, as demonstrated in Fig 12. The maximum value of the oxidation peak current occurred at pH 4.0, and then decreased as pH increased further, as shown in S4 Fig. With the increase in pH from 3.0 to 9.0, it was observed that the oxidation peak potential shifted inversely, which exhibits the direct involvement of hydrogen ions in the oxidation process. The relationship between pH and Epa is presented in S5 Fig and the equation of linear regression is: (4)

Download:

Fig 12. The CV responces of 1 × 10–4 mol L⁻¹ 2,4-DCP on CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE in B–R buffer at different pH values (3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0) with the scan rate of 50 mVs^-1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g012

The absolute values of the slope (V/pH)were close to the theoretical value of 0.059. This observation indicated that the number of electrons transferred was equal to the number of hydrogen ions that participated in the electrode reaction [51]. The optimum and well-defined peak current for 2,4-DCPH was obtained at pH 5, as shown in Fig 12. Therefore, the B–R buffer (pH 5.0) was utilized as the supporting electrolyte in all measurements.

3.6. Analytical properties

The detection reproducibility was investigated by determining the relative standard deviation (RSD) of eight duplicate measurements on a single electrode in 2,4-DCPH (1.0 × 10⁻⁶ mol L^-1). It was determined that the RSD of peak currents for 2,4-DCPHwas 3.8%. Four GO/OXSWCNTs/GCEs were set up with the same configuration, and the 2,4-DCPH (1 μM) solution was detected by DPV under the optimized conditions. An RSD value of 6.1% was obtained for the experiment. The results showed that such factors did not impact the signals with RSDs < 7%. In addition, the stability of the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCEs was determined over a period of 25 days. After 25 days, the peak current of 2,4-DCPH (1 μM) retained 85.7% of its initial response. This finding signified that the modified electrode possessed good stability.

To identify and investigate the possible analytical applications of the proposed sensor, the interference of some potential organic ions and inorganic compounds in real samples were examined by analyzing a standard solution of 2,4-DCPH (1.0 x 10⁻⁶ mol L^-1) in the B-R buffer (pH 5.0), as presented in S6 Fig. Except for Mn²⁺ and Cu²⁺, the metal ions at large concentrations (1.0 × 10⁻³ mol L^-1) had almost no noticeable impact on the peak current. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was added to the detection system to eliminate Mn²⁺ interference with Cu²⁺. It was observed that the current of 2,4-DCPHremained constant when Mn²⁺ and Cu²⁺(1.0 × 10⁻³ mol L^-1) were present in the B-R buffer after the addition of EDTA (3.0 × 10⁻³ mol L^-1). The supporting electrolyte of the B-R buffer contained 3.0 × 10⁻³ mol L^-1 of EDTA in these experiments. Considering that phenols with a similar structure may have similar electrochemical interferences with the determination of 2,4-DCPH, the electrochemical behaviors of common phenols (phenol, 2-CP, 4-CP, and o-PDA)were also assessed carefully under the same conditions. Fig 13 demonstrates that 2-CP and 4-CP exhibited similar electrochemical behaviors to that of 2,4-DCPH. However, their oxidation potentials (0.59 V) were different from those of 2,4-DCPH, and the o-PDA oxidation potential (0.53 V) was also significantly different from that of 2,4-DCPH. Although the electrochemical signals of 2,4-DCPH were much larger than those of phenol, their oxidation potential values were very similar to one another. Therefore, the CPA/GO-OXSWCNT/GCE sensor may have the potential to selectively determine chlorophenols.

Download:

Fig 13. DPV responses of 2,4-DCP in presence of organic compounds.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g013

As an electrochemical method, DPV has a much higher current sensitivity and better resolution compared to CV [57]. Therefore, DPV was used to determine the electrochemical response of 2,4-DCPHat different concentrations of CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE under the optimized conditions. Fig 14 shows that the oxidation peak currents of 2,4-DCPH gradually increase as the concentration increases from 0.05 to 1.2 × 10⁻⁶ mol L^-1. The relationship between the peak current (I) and concentration (c) is shown in S7 Fig and the equation of linear regression is: (5)

Download:

Fig 14. DPV of different concentration of 2,4-DCP: 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.9 and 1.2 ×10⁻⁶ mol L^-1 on the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE in B-R buffer (pH 5.0).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.g014

The detection limit (LOD) can be expressed as: (6) where Sa is the standard deviation of the response and b is the calibration curve slope. The LOD for 2,4-DCPH was determined to be approximately 4.2 × 10⁻⁶ mol L^-1. Compared with other electrochemical sensors [58–65], the fabricated CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE exhibited a relatively high sensitivity and wide linear range (Table 3). For practical applications, the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE sensor was employed to detect 2,4-DCPH in fish farm water samples by the standard addition method. The water was filtered and adjusted to pH 5.0 with the B-R buffer. The recoveries and RSDs were measured and are shown in Table 4. The recoveries and RSD for 2,4-DCPH were calculated as 95.3–104% and 2.41–3.5%, respectively. This demonstrated that the electrode can be applied to the analysis of real samples.

Download:

Table 3. Performance comparison of the fabricated electrode for 2,4-DCP detection with the other reported electrodes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.t003

Download:

Table 4. Results of 2,4-DCP determination in fish farm water analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.t004

4. Conclusion

In this study, CPA/OXCNM NCs were synthesized by the oxidative chemical polymerization method and used to fabricate an electrochemical sensor to detect 2,4-DCPHin a fish farm water sample. The introduction of both types of OXCNTs and GO with high conductivity considerably increased the electrochemical performance of the CPA electrodes. Compared with CPA/GO-OXMWCNT NCs, CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs showed considerably improved electrochemical performance. In the as-prepared CPA/GO-OXSWCNT NCs and CPA/GO-OXMWCNT NCs, the mixture of OXCNMs created highly interconnected networks which offered fast electron and charge transport paths to achieve high electrical conductivity. In addition, the GO-supported CPA-coated OXCNT ternary hybrid microstructure exhibited a high surface area and increased electrical conductivity. In comparison to bare GCE and other NCs, the oxidation peak current of 2,4-DCPH was significantly increased for the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE sensor. The electrochemical behavior of 2,4-DCPH on the modified electrode is a diffusion-controlled process that involves two electrons with two proton transfers. The prepared CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE sensor exhibited strong catalytic activity for 2,4-DCPH oxidation and exhibited a favorable quantitatively reproducible analytical performance. This novel method has certain clear advantages such as simplicity, low-cost, rapid response, and high sensitivity.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. DTG curves of CPA and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Plot of Ipa vs. square root of the scan rate (ν ^1/2) of 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ 2,4-DCP at pH = 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Plot of Ep,a vs. lnν for anodic peak of 2,4-DCP at pH 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Fig. The peak current (Ipa) of 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ 2,4-DCP in in B–R buffer at different pH values at the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s004

(DOCX)

S5 Fig. The oxidation peak potential with respect to pH; scan rate 50 mVs^-1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s005

(DOCX)

S6 Fig. Column chart of the oxidation peak current of 1 ×10–6 mol L^-1 2,4-DCP in B-R buffer solution (pH of 5.0), containing 1.0 ×10⁻³ mol L^-1 metal ions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s006

(DOCX)

S7 Fig. The calibration curve of the DPV responses of 2,4-DCP concentration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s007

(DOCX)

S1 Graphical Abstract.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234815.s008

(TIF)

References

1. Pan Y.; Jiang S.; Xiong W.; Liu D.; Li M.; He B.; et al. Supported CuO catalysts on metal-organic framework (Cu-UiO-66) for efficient catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of 4-chlorophenol in wastewater. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2020,291, 109703.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Kumaresan N.; Ramamurthi K., Synthesis of ZnO/rGO nanocomposites by wet impregnation method for photocatalytic performance against RhB dye and 4-chlorophenol under UV light irradiation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2020,31 (4), 3361–3374.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Kamel R. M.; Shahat A.; Anwar Z. M.; El-Kady H. A.; Kilany E. M., Efficient dual sensor of alternate nanomaterials for sensitive and rapid monitoring of ultra-trace phenols in sea water. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2020,297, 111798.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. He Q.; Guan T.; He Y.; Lu B.; Li D.; Chen X.; et al. Digital encoding based molecular imprinting suspension array for multiplexed label-free sensing of phenol derivatives. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2018,271, 367–373.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Wu W.; Xiao H.; Luo S.; Liu C.; Tang Y.; Yang L., A highly stable and effective electrochemiluminescence platform of copper oxide nanowires coupled with graphene for ultrasensitive detection of pentachlorophenol. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016,222, 747–754.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Tabaraki R.; Heidarizadi E., Spectrophotometric determination of phenol and chlorophenols by salting out assisted liquid-liquid extraction combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2019,215, 405–409.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Farajzadeh M.; Khiavi E.; Feriduni B., Determination of phenolic compounds in industrial wastewaters by gas chromatography after extraction and preconcentration by microextraction procedure. GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL 2020,22 (1), 109–118.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Zhang J.-H.; Zhang M.; Xie S.-M.; He P.-G.; Yuan L.-M., A novel inorganic mesoporous material with a nematic structure derived from nanocrystalline cellulose as the stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Methods 2015,7 (8), 3448–3453.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Wu Y.; Zhang W.; Chen Z., A poly (4‐vinylpridine‐co‐ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolithic concentrator for in‐line concentration‐capillary electrophoresis analysis of phenols in water samples. Electrophoresis 2012,33 (18), 2911–2919.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Yu H.; Yang S.; Zhao B.; Lu Y.; Zhu S.; Wang X.; et al. Enhanced electrochemical dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol on a nickel foam electrode modified with palladium, polypyrrole and graphene. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2020, 114099.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Marinović S.; Mudrinić T.; Jović-Jovičić N.; Ajduković M.; Milutinović–Nikolić A.; Banković P.; et al. Non-toxic poly (vinyl alcohol)/clay composites as electrode material for detection of 4-chlorophenol and 4-nitrophenol. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2019,848, 113280.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Eftekhari A.; Li L.; Yang Y., Polyaniline supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources 2017,347, 86–107.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Naveen M. H.; Gurudatt N. G.; Shim Y.-B., Applications of conducting polymer composites to electrochemical sensors: a review. Applied materials today 2017,9, 419–433.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Lou C.; Jing T.; Zhou J.; Tian J.; Zheng Y.; Wang C.; et al. Laccase immobilized polyaniline/magnetic graphene composite electrode for detecting hydroquinone. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2020,149, 1130–1138. pmid:32001285
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Hu Q.; Zhou N.; Gong K.; Liu H.; Liu Q.; Sun D.; et al. Intracellular polymer substances induced conductive polyaniline for improved methane production from anaerobic wastewater treatment. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019,7 (6), 5912–5920.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Gu Z.; Ye J.; Song W.; Shen Q., Synthesis of polyaniline nanotubes with controlled rectangular or square pore shape. Materials Letters 2014,121, 12–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Rahy A.; Yang D. J., Synthesis of highly conductive polyaniline nanofibers. Materials Letters 2008,62 (28), 4311–4314.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Ma Y.; Zhuang Z.; Ma M.; Yang Y.; Li W.; Dong M.; et al. Solid polyaniline dendrites consisting of high aspect ratio branches self-assembled using sodium lauryl sulfonate as soft templates: synthesis and electrochemical performance. Polymer 2019,182, 121808.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Lu X.; Zhang W.; Wang C.; Wen T.-C.; Wei Y., One-dimensional conducting polymer nanocomposites: Synthesis, properties and applications. Progress in Polymer Science 2011,36 (5), 671–712.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Vogel A. I., Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. Longmans Group Ltd, England 1996,3rd ed.
21. SHAHRIARY LEILA; ATHAWALE A. A., Graphene Oxide Synthesized by using Modified Hummers Approach. International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering 2014,02, 58–63.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Rahman M. M.; Hussein M. A.; Abdel Salam M.; Asiri A. M., Fabrication of an l-glutathione sensor based on PEG-conjugated functionalized CNT nanocomposites: a real sample analysis. New Journal of Chemistry 2017,41 (19), 10761–10772.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Kang N.; Ji L.; Zhao J.; Zhou X.; Weng X.; Li H.; et al. Uniform growth of Fe3O4 nanocubes on the single-walled carbon nanotubes as an electrosensor of organic dyes and the study on its catalytic mechanism. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2019,833, 70–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Zhang Z.; Xu J.; Wen Y.; Wang T., A highly-sensitive VB2 electrochemical sensor based on one-step co-electrodeposited molecularly imprinted WS2-PEDOT film supported on graphene oxide-SWCNTs nanocomposite. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018,92, 77–87.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Wang X.; Deng J.; Duan X.; Liu D.; Guo J.; Liu P., Crosslinked polyaniline nanorods with improved electrochemical performance as electrode material for supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2014,2 (31), 12323–12329.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Ramana G. V.; Srikanth V. V. S. S.; Padya B.; Jain P. K., Carbon nanotube–polyaniline nanotube core–shell structures for electrochemical applications. European Polymer Journal 2014,57, 137–142.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Elnaggar E. M.; Kabel K. I.; Farag A. A.; Al-Gamal A. G., Comparative study on doping of polyaniline with graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry 2017,7 (1), 75–83.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Chiang J.-C.; MacDiarmid A. G., ‘Polyaniline’: Protonic acid doping of the emeraldine form to the metallic regime. Synthetic Metals 1986,13 (1–3), 193–205.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Ping Z., In situ FTIR–attenuated total reflection spectroscopic investigations on the base–acid transitions of polyaniline. Base–acid transition in the emeraldine form of polyaniline. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1996,92 (17), 3063–3067.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Furukawa Y.; Hara T.; Hyodo Y.; Harada I., Vibrational spectra of polyaniline and its 15N-and 2H-substituted derivatives in as-polymerized, alkali-treated and reduced states. Synthetic Metals 1986,16 (2), 189–198.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Yang Y.; Chen S.; Xu L., Enhanced conductivity of polyaniline by conjugated crosslinking. Macromolecular rapid communications 2011,32 (7), 593–597. pmid:21438058
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Ibrahim N. I.; Wasfi A. S., A comparative study of polyaniline/MWCNT with polyaniline/SWCNT nanocomposite films synthesized by microwave plasma polymerization. Synthetic Metals 2019,250, 49–54.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Quillard S.; Louarn G.; Lefrant S.; MacDiarmid A., Vibrational analysis of polyaniline: a comparative study of leucoemeraldine, emeraldine, and pernigraniline bases. Physical Review B 1994,50 (17), 12496.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Sharma A. K.; Chaudhary G.; Kaushal I.; Bhardwaj U.; Mishra A., Studies on nanocomposites of polyaniline using different substrates. Am. J. Polym. Sci 2015,1, 1–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Yang J.; Wang X.; Wang X.; Jia R.; Huang J., Preparation of highly conductive CNTs/polyaniline composites through plasma pretreating and in-situ polymerization. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2010,71 (4), 448–452.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Yao Q.; Chen L.; Zhang W.; Liufu S.; Chen X., Enhanced thermoelectric performance of single-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline hybrid nanocomposites. Acs Nano 2010,4 (4), 2445–2451. pmid:20359234
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Zengin H.; Zhou W.; Jin J.; Czerw R.; Smith D. W. Jr.; Echegoyen L.; et al. Carbon Nanotube Doped Polyaniline. Advanced Materials 2002,14 (20), 1480–1483.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Dresselhaus M. S.; Dresselhaus G.; Saito R.; Jorio A., Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Physics reports 2005,409 (2), 47–99.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Bhattacharya P.; Dhibar S.; Hatui G.; Mandal A.; Das T.; Das C. K., Graphene decorated with hexagonal shaped M-type ferrite and polyaniline wrapper: a potential candidate for electromagnetic wave absorbing and energy storage device applications. Rsc Advances 2014,4 (33), 17039–17053.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Luo J.; Zuo Y.; Shen P.; Yan Z.; Zhang K., Excellent microwave absorption properties by tuned electromagnetic parameters in polyaniline-coated Ba0.9La0.1Fe11.9Ni0.1O19/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. RSC Advances 2017,7 (58), 36433–36443.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Holzinger M.; Abraham J.; Whelan P.; Graupner R.; Ley L.; Hennrich F.; et al. Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with (R-)Oxycarbonyl Nitrenes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2003,125 (28), 8566–8580. pmid:12848565
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Madhankumar A.; Rajendran N., A promising copolymer of p-phenylendiamine and o-aminophenol: chemical and electrochemical synthesis, characterization and its corrosion protection aspect on mild steel. Synthetic Metals 2012,162 (1–2), 176–185.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Katowah D. F.; Rahman M. M.; Hussein M. A.; Sobahi T.; Gabal M.; Alam M.; et al. Ternary nanocomposite based poly (pyrrole-co-O-toluidine), cobalt ferrite and decorated chitosan as a selective Co2+ cationic sensor. Composites Part B: Engineering 2019,175, 107175.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Hussein M. A.; Abu-Zied B. M.; Asiri A. M., Fabrication of EPYR/GNP/MWCNT carbon-based composite materials for promoted epoxy coating performance. RSC advances 2018, 8 (42), 23555–23566.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Shih C.-J.; Lin S.; Sharma R.; Strano M. S.; Blankschtein D., Understanding the pH-dependent behavior of graphene oxide aqueous solutions: a comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Langmuir 2011,28 (1), 235–241. pmid:22039913
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Mitra M.; Kulsi C.; Chatterjee K.; Kargupta K.; Ganguly S.; Banerjee D.; et al. Reduced graphene oxide-polyaniline composites—synthesis, characterization and optimization for thermoelectric applications. RSC Advances 2015,5 (39), 31039–31048.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Meng, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, S.; Liu, T., Facile synthesis of shell–core polyaniline/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ composites and magnetic properties. 2016.
48. Hong X.; Xie Y.; Wang X.; Li M.; Le Z.; Gao Y.; et al. A novel ternary hybrid electromagnetic wave-absorbing composite based on BaFe11. 92 (LaNd) 0.04 O19-titanium dioxide/multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polythiophene. Composites Science and Technology 2015,117, 215–224.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Kumar A.; Kumar V.; Kumar M.; Awasthi K., Synthesis and characterization of hybrid PANI/MWCNT nanocomposites for EMI applications. Polymer Composites 2018,39 (11), 3858–3868.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Hao M.; Chen Y.; Xiong W.; Zhang L.; Wu L.; Fu Y.; et al. In situ synthesis of crosslinked-polyaniline nano-pillar arrays/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for supercapacitors. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 2016,20 (3), 665–671.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Chaplin B. P., Critical review of electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for water treatment applications. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2014,16 (6), 1182–1203.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Laviron E., General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram in the case of diffusionless electrochemical systems. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1979,101 (1), 19–28.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Wu Y.; Ji X.; Hu S., Studies on electrochemical oxidation of azithromycin and its interaction with bovine serum albumin. Bioelectrochemistry 2004,64 (1), 91–97. pmid:15219252
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Bard A. J.; Faulkner L. R.; Leddy J.; Zoski C. G., Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications. wiley New York: 1980; Vol. 2.
55. Gosser D. K., Cyclic voltammetry: simulation and analysis of reaction mechanisms. VCH New York: 1993; Vol. 43.
56. Mohammed G.; Khraibah N.; Bashammakh A.; El-Shahawi M., Electrochemical sensor for trace determination of timolol maleate drug in real samples and drug residues using Nafion/carboxylated-MWCNTs nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Microchemical Journal 2018,143, 474–483.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Mohammed G. I.; Metwally Nassef H.; Bashammakh A. S.; Saigl Z. M.; El-Shahawi M. S., Analysis of β-blocker timolol maleate drug residues in wastewater and biological fluids using differential pulse–anodic stripping voltammetry. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2020, 1–17.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Yu L.; Yue X.; Yang R.; Jing S.; Qu L., A sensitive and low toxicity electrochemical sensor for 2, 4-dichlorophenol based on the nanocomposite of carbon dots, hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide and chitosan. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016,224, 241–247.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Al-Qasmi N.; Soomro M. T.; Ismail I. M.; Danish E. Y.; Al-Ghamdi A. A., An enhanced electrocatalytic oxidation and determination of 2, 4-dichlorophenol on multilayer deposited functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube/Nafion composite film electrode. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 2015.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Dong S.; Suo G.; Li N.; Chen Z.; Peng L.; Fu Y.; et al. A simple strategy to fabricate high sensitive 2, 4-dichlorophenol electrochemical sensor based on metal organic framework Cu3 (BTC) 2. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016,222, 972–979.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Ma Y.; Zhuang Z.; Ma M.; Yang Y.; Li W.; lin J.; et al. Solid polyaniline dendrites consisting of high aspect ratio branches self-assembled using sodium lauryl sulfonate as soft templates: Synthesis and electrochemical performance. Polymer 2019,182, 121808.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Rasdi F. L. M.; Mohamad S.; Manan N. S. A.; Nodeh H. R., Electrochemical determination of 2, 4-dichlorophenol at β-cyclodextrin functionalized ionic liquid modified chemical sensor: voltammetric and amperometric studies. RSC Advances 2016,6 (102), 100186–100194.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Alfano, B.; Massera, E.; De Maria, A.; De Girolamo, A.; Di Francia, G.; Veneri, P. D.; et al. A. In Polyaniline proton doping for sensor application, 2015 XVIII AISEM Annual Conference, IEEE: 2015; pp 1–4.
64. Ayad M.; El-Hefnawy G.; Zaghlol S., Facile synthesis of polyaniline nanoparticles; its adsorption behavior. Chemical engineering journal 2013, 217, 460–465.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Long Y.-Z.; Li M.-M.; Gu C.; Wan M.; Duvail J.-L.; Liu Z.; et al. Recent advances in synthesis, physical properties and applications of conducting polymer nanotubes and nanofibers. Progress in Polymer Science 2011, 36 (10), 1415–1442.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Pan Y.; Jiang S.; Xiong W.; Liu D.; Li M.; He B.; et al. Supported CuO catalysts on metal-organic framework (Cu-UiO-66) for efficient catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of 4-chlorophenol in wastewater. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2020,291, 109703.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Kumaresan N.; Ramamurthi K., Synthesis of ZnO/rGO nanocomposites by wet impregnation method for photocatalytic performance against RhB dye and 4-chlorophenol under UV light irradiation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2020,31 (4), 3361–3374.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Kamel R. M.; Shahat A.; Anwar Z. M.; El-Kady H. A.; Kilany E. M., Efficient dual sensor of alternate nanomaterials for sensitive and rapid monitoring of ultra-trace phenols in sea water. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2020,297, 111798.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. He Q.; Guan T.; He Y.; Lu B.; Li D.; Chen X.; et al. Digital encoding based molecular imprinting suspension array for multiplexed label-free sensing of phenol derivatives. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2018,271, 367–373.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Wu W.; Xiao H.; Luo S.; Liu C.; Tang Y.; Yang L., A highly stable and effective electrochemiluminescence platform of copper oxide nanowires coupled with graphene for ultrasensitive detection of pentachlorophenol. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016,222, 747–754.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Tabaraki R.; Heidarizadi E., Spectrophotometric determination of phenol and chlorophenols by salting out assisted liquid-liquid extraction combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2019,215, 405–409.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Farajzadeh M.; Khiavi E.; Feriduni B., Determination of phenolic compounds in industrial wastewaters by gas chromatography after extraction and preconcentration by microextraction procedure. GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL 2020,22 (1), 109–118.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Zhang J.-H.; Zhang M.; Xie S.-M.; He P.-G.; Yuan L.-M., A novel inorganic mesoporous material with a nematic structure derived from nanocrystalline cellulose as the stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Methods 2015,7 (8), 3448–3453.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Wu Y.; Zhang W.; Chen Z., A poly (4‐vinylpridine‐co‐ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolithic concentrator for in‐line concentration‐capillary electrophoresis analysis of phenols in water samples. Electrophoresis 2012,33 (18), 2911–2919.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Yu H.; Yang S.; Zhao B.; Lu Y.; Zhu S.; Wang X.; et al. Enhanced electrochemical dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol on a nickel foam electrode modified with palladium, polypyrrole and graphene. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2020, 114099.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Marinović S.; Mudrinić T.; Jović-Jovičić N.; Ajduković M.; Milutinović–Nikolić A.; Banković P.; et al. Non-toxic poly (vinyl alcohol)/clay composites as electrode material for detection of 4-chlorophenol and 4-nitrophenol. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2019,848, 113280.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Eftekhari A.; Li L.; Yang Y., Polyaniline supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources 2017,347, 86–107.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Naveen M. H.; Gurudatt N. G.; Shim Y.-B., Applications of conducting polymer composites to electrochemical sensors: a review. Applied materials today 2017,9, 419–433.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Lou C.; Jing T.; Zhou J.; Tian J.; Zheng Y.; Wang C.; et al. Laccase immobilized polyaniline/magnetic graphene composite electrode for detecting hydroquinone. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2020,149, 1130–1138. pmid:32001285
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hu Q.; Zhou N.; Gong K.; Liu H.; Liu Q.; Sun D.; et al. Intracellular polymer substances induced conductive polyaniline for improved methane production from anaerobic wastewater treatment. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019,7 (6), 5912–5920.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Gu Z.; Ye J.; Song W.; Shen Q., Synthesis of polyaniline nanotubes with controlled rectangular or square pore shape. Materials Letters 2014,121, 12–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Rahy A.; Yang D. J., Synthesis of highly conductive polyaniline nanofibers. Materials Letters 2008,62 (28), 4311–4314.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Ma Y.; Zhuang Z.; Ma M.; Yang Y.; Li W.; Dong M.; et al. Solid polyaniline dendrites consisting of high aspect ratio branches self-assembled using sodium lauryl sulfonate as soft templates: synthesis and electrochemical performance. Polymer 2019,182, 121808.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Lu X.; Zhang W.; Wang C.; Wen T.-C.; Wei Y., One-dimensional conducting polymer nanocomposites: Synthesis, properties and applications. Progress in Polymer Science 2011,36 (5), 671–712.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Vogel A. I., Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. Longmans Group Ltd, England 1996,3rd ed.

[ref21] 21. SHAHRIARY LEILA; ATHAWALE A. A., Graphene Oxide Synthesized by using Modified Hummers Approach. International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering 2014,02, 58–63.
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Rahman M. M.; Hussein M. A.; Abdel Salam M.; Asiri A. M., Fabrication of an l-glutathione sensor based on PEG-conjugated functionalized CNT nanocomposites: a real sample analysis. New Journal of Chemistry 2017,41 (19), 10761–10772.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Kang N.; Ji L.; Zhao J.; Zhou X.; Weng X.; Li H.; et al. Uniform growth of Fe3O4 nanocubes on the single-walled carbon nanotubes as an electrosensor of organic dyes and the study on its catalytic mechanism. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2019,833, 70–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Zhang Z.; Xu J.; Wen Y.; Wang T., A highly-sensitive VB2 electrochemical sensor based on one-step co-electrodeposited molecularly imprinted WS2-PEDOT film supported on graphene oxide-SWCNTs nanocomposite. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2018,92, 77–87.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wang X.; Deng J.; Duan X.; Liu D.; Guo J.; Liu P., Crosslinked polyaniline nanorods with improved electrochemical performance as electrode material for supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2014,2 (31), 12323–12329.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Ramana G. V.; Srikanth V. V. S. S.; Padya B.; Jain P. K., Carbon nanotube–polyaniline nanotube core–shell structures for electrochemical applications. European Polymer Journal 2014,57, 137–142.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Elnaggar E. M.; Kabel K. I.; Farag A. A.; Al-Gamal A. G., Comparative study on doping of polyaniline with graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry 2017,7 (1), 75–83.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Chiang J.-C.; MacDiarmid A. G., ‘Polyaniline’: Protonic acid doping of the emeraldine form to the metallic regime. Synthetic Metals 1986,13 (1–3), 193–205.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Ping Z., In situ FTIR–attenuated total reflection spectroscopic investigations on the base–acid transitions of polyaniline. Base–acid transition in the emeraldine form of polyaniline. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1996,92 (17), 3063–3067.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Furukawa Y.; Hara T.; Hyodo Y.; Harada I., Vibrational spectra of polyaniline and its 15N-and 2H-substituted derivatives in as-polymerized, alkali-treated and reduced states. Synthetic Metals 1986,16 (2), 189–198.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Yang Y.; Chen S.; Xu L., Enhanced conductivity of polyaniline by conjugated crosslinking. Macromolecular rapid communications 2011,32 (7), 593–597. pmid:21438058
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Ibrahim N. I.; Wasfi A. S., A comparative study of polyaniline/MWCNT with polyaniline/SWCNT nanocomposite films synthesized by microwave plasma polymerization. Synthetic Metals 2019,250, 49–54.
View Article
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Quillard S.; Louarn G.; Lefrant S.; MacDiarmid A., Vibrational analysis of polyaniline: a comparative study of leucoemeraldine, emeraldine, and pernigraniline bases. Physical Review B 1994,50 (17), 12496.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Sharma A. K.; Chaudhary G.; Kaushal I.; Bhardwaj U.; Mishra A., Studies on nanocomposites of polyaniline using different substrates. Am. J. Polym. Sci 2015,1, 1–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Yang J.; Wang X.; Wang X.; Jia R.; Huang J., Preparation of highly conductive CNTs/polyaniline composites through plasma pretreating and in-situ polymerization. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2010,71 (4), 448–452.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Yao Q.; Chen L.; Zhang W.; Liufu S.; Chen X., Enhanced thermoelectric performance of single-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline hybrid nanocomposites. Acs Nano 2010,4 (4), 2445–2451. pmid:20359234
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Zengin H.; Zhou W.; Jin J.; Czerw R.; Smith D. W. Jr.; Echegoyen L.; et al. Carbon Nanotube Doped Polyaniline. Advanced Materials 2002,14 (20), 1480–1483.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Dresselhaus M. S.; Dresselhaus G.; Saito R.; Jorio A., Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Physics reports 2005,409 (2), 47–99.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Bhattacharya P.; Dhibar S.; Hatui G.; Mandal A.; Das T.; Das C. K., Graphene decorated with hexagonal shaped M-type ferrite and polyaniline wrapper: a potential candidate for electromagnetic wave absorbing and energy storage device applications. Rsc Advances 2014,4 (33), 17039–17053.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Luo J.; Zuo Y.; Shen P.; Yan Z.; Zhang K., Excellent microwave absorption properties by tuned electromagnetic parameters in polyaniline-coated Ba0.9La0.1Fe11.9Ni0.1O19/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. RSC Advances 2017,7 (58), 36433–36443.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Holzinger M.; Abraham J.; Whelan P.; Graupner R.; Ley L.; Hennrich F.; et al. Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with (R-)Oxycarbonyl Nitrenes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2003,125 (28), 8566–8580. pmid:12848565
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Madhankumar A.; Rajendran N., A promising copolymer of p-phenylendiamine and o-aminophenol: chemical and electrochemical synthesis, characterization and its corrosion protection aspect on mild steel. Synthetic Metals 2012,162 (1–2), 176–185.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Katowah D. F.; Rahman M. M.; Hussein M. A.; Sobahi T.; Gabal M.; Alam M.; et al. Ternary nanocomposite based poly (pyrrole-co-O-toluidine), cobalt ferrite and decorated chitosan as a selective Co2+ cationic sensor. Composites Part B: Engineering 2019,175, 107175.
View Article
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Hussein M. A.; Abu-Zied B. M.; Asiri A. M., Fabrication of EPYR/GNP/MWCNT carbon-based composite materials for promoted epoxy coating performance. RSC advances 2018, 8 (42), 23555–23566.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Shih C.-J.; Lin S.; Sharma R.; Strano M. S.; Blankschtein D., Understanding the pH-dependent behavior of graphene oxide aqueous solutions: a comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Langmuir 2011,28 (1), 235–241. pmid:22039913
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Mitra M.; Kulsi C.; Chatterjee K.; Kargupta K.; Ganguly S.; Banerjee D.; et al. Reduced graphene oxide-polyaniline composites—synthesis, characterization and optimization for thermoelectric applications. RSC Advances 2015,5 (39), 31039–31048.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Meng, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, S.; Liu, T., Facile synthesis of shell–core polyaniline/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ composites and magnetic properties. 2016.

[ref48] 48. Hong X.; Xie Y.; Wang X.; Li M.; Le Z.; Gao Y.; et al. A novel ternary hybrid electromagnetic wave-absorbing composite based on BaFe11. 92 (LaNd) 0.04 O19-titanium dioxide/multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polythiophene. Composites Science and Technology 2015,117, 215–224.
View Article
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Kumar A.; Kumar V.; Kumar M.; Awasthi K., Synthesis and characterization of hybrid PANI/MWCNT nanocomposites for EMI applications. Polymer Composites 2018,39 (11), 3858–3868.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Hao M.; Chen Y.; Xiong W.; Zhang L.; Wu L.; Fu Y.; et al. In situ synthesis of crosslinked-polyaniline nano-pillar arrays/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for supercapacitors. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 2016,20 (3), 665–671.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Chaplin B. P., Critical review of electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for water treatment applications. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2014,16 (6), 1182–1203.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Laviron E., General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram in the case of diffusionless electrochemical systems. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1979,101 (1), 19–28.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Wu Y.; Ji X.; Hu S., Studies on electrochemical oxidation of azithromycin and its interaction with bovine serum albumin. Bioelectrochemistry 2004,64 (1), 91–97. pmid:15219252
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Bard A. J.; Faulkner L. R.; Leddy J.; Zoski C. G., Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications. wiley New York: 1980; Vol. 2.

[ref55] 55. Gosser D. K., Cyclic voltammetry: simulation and analysis of reaction mechanisms. VCH New York: 1993; Vol. 43.

[ref56] 56. Mohammed G.; Khraibah N.; Bashammakh A.; El-Shahawi M., Electrochemical sensor for trace determination of timolol maleate drug in real samples and drug residues using Nafion/carboxylated-MWCNTs nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Microchemical Journal 2018,143, 474–483.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Mohammed G. I.; Metwally Nassef H.; Bashammakh A. S.; Saigl Z. M.; El-Shahawi M. S., Analysis of β-blocker timolol maleate drug residues in wastewater and biological fluids using differential pulse–anodic stripping voltammetry. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2020, 1–17.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Yu L.; Yue X.; Yang R.; Jing S.; Qu L., A sensitive and low toxicity electrochemical sensor for 2, 4-dichlorophenol based on the nanocomposite of carbon dots, hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide and chitosan. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016,224, 241–247.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Al-Qasmi N.; Soomro M. T.; Ismail I. M.; Danish E. Y.; Al-Ghamdi A. A., An enhanced electrocatalytic oxidation and determination of 2, 4-dichlorophenol on multilayer deposited functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube/Nafion composite film electrode. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 2015.
View Article
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Dong S.; Suo G.; Li N.; Chen Z.; Peng L.; Fu Y.; et al. A simple strategy to fabricate high sensitive 2, 4-dichlorophenol electrochemical sensor based on metal organic framework Cu3 (BTC) 2. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016,222, 972–979.
View Article
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Ma Y.; Zhuang Z.; Ma M.; Yang Y.; Li W.; lin J.; et al. Solid polyaniline dendrites consisting of high aspect ratio branches self-assembled using sodium lauryl sulfonate as soft templates: Synthesis and electrochemical performance. Polymer 2019,182, 121808.
View Article
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Rasdi F. L. M.; Mohamad S.; Manan N. S. A.; Nodeh H. R., Electrochemical determination of 2, 4-dichlorophenol at β-cyclodextrin functionalized ionic liquid modified chemical sensor: voltammetric and amperometric studies. RSC Advances 2016,6 (102), 100186–100194.
View Article
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Alfano, B.; Massera, E.; De Maria, A.; De Girolamo, A.; Di Francia, G.; Veneri, P. D.; et al. A. In Polyaniline proton doping for sensor application, 2015 XVIII AISEM Annual Conference, IEEE: 2015; pp 1–4.

[ref64] 64. Ayad M.; El-Hefnawy G.; Zaghlol S., Facile synthesis of polyaniline nanoparticles; its adsorption behavior. Chemical engineering journal 2013, 217, 460–465.
View Article
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Long Y.-Z.; Li M.-M.; Gu C.; Wan M.; Duvail J.-L.; Liu Z.; et al. Recent advances in synthesis, physical properties and applications of conducting polymer nanotubes and nanofibers. Progress in Polymer Science 2011, 36 (10), 1415–1442.
View Article
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Instrumentation

2.3. Synthesis of OXCNMs

2.3.1. Synthesis of GO.

2.3.2. Synthesis of OXSWCNTs and OXMWCNTs.

2.3.3. Synthesis of GO-OXSWCNTs and GO-OXMWCNTs.

2.4. Synthesis of CPA and CPA/OXCNM NCs

2.5. Fabrication of the working electrode

2.6. Electrochemical measurements

2.7. Water sample preparation and analysis

2.8. Ethics statement

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization

3.2. Electrochemical characterization of modified electrodes

3.3. Electrochemical performance of the modified electrodes in detecting2,4-DCPH

3.4. Cyclic voltammetric behavior

3.5. Optimization of analytical parameters

3.6. Analytical properties

4. Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. DTG curves of CPA and CPA/OXCNMsNCs.

S2 Fig. Plot of Ipa vs. square root of the scan rate (ν 1/2) of 1 × 10−4 mol L−1 2,4-DCP at pH = 5.

S3 Fig. Plot of Ep,a vs. lnν for anodic peak of 2,4-DCP at pH 5.

S4 Fig. The peak current (Ipa) of 1 × 10−4 mol L−1 2,4-DCP in in B–R buffer at different pH values at the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE.

S5 Fig. The oxidation peak potential with respect to pH; scan rate 50 mVs-1.

S6 Fig. Column chart of the oxidation peak current of 1 ×10–6 mol L-1 2,4-DCP in B-R buffer solution (pH of 5.0), containing 1.0 ×10−3 mol L-1 metal ions.

S7 Fig. The calibration curve of the DPV responses of 2,4-DCP concentration.

S1 Graphical Abstract.

References

S2 Fig. Plot of Ipa vs. square root of the scan rate (ν ^1/2) of 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ 2,4-DCP at pH = 5.

S4 Fig. The peak current (Ipa) of 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ 2,4-DCP in in B–R buffer at different pH values at the CPA/GO-OXSWCNTs/GCE.

S5 Fig. The oxidation peak potential with respect to pH; scan rate 50 mVs^-1.

S6 Fig. Column chart of the oxidation peak current of 1 ×10–6 mol L^-1 2,4-DCP in B-R buffer solution (pH of 5.0), containing 1.0 ×10⁻³ mol L^-1 metal ions.