Figures
Abstract
Understanding gender differences in health-related behaviors and their impacts is a crucial aspect of effective primary care. We studied gender-based differences in predictors of metabolic syndrome (MetS) resolution among newly diagnosed MetS patients. This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial study comprising of 637 middle-aged and older adults (226 men and 411 women) who underwent a regular health checkup and were newly diagnosed with MetS at 16 different health clinics of 14 metropolitan cities and provinces. We conducted Cox proportional hazard analysis to estimate cumulative probability of MetS resolution within a 12‐month observation period. Among the 637 patients, 47.6% of participants achieved MetS resolution. The resolution rate was similar among men and women (44.7% and 49.1%, respectively, P = 0.320). Low household income (Hazard ratio = 2.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.13–6.08) and current employment (2.29, 1.26–4.13) were associated with a higher cumulative probability of MetS resolution in men than in women. For women, however, longer sleeping hours (1.18, 1.04–1.34) and living with a partner (1.58, 1.06–2.35) were positive predictors of MetS resolution. Being overweight (0.63, 0.44–0.89) was associated with lower cumulative probability of MetS resolution in women than in men. The factors associated with cumulative probability of MetS resolution within the 12-month follow-up were different between men and women. These findings facilitate further exploration on gender-based differences in risk factors for less optimal improvements in MetS.
Citation: Choe S-A, Yoon N-H, Yoo S, Kim H (2020) Gender-differences in predictors for time to metabolic syndrome resolution: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial study. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0234035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234035
Editor: Antonio Palazón-Bru, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche, SPAIN
Received: September 18, 2019; Accepted: May 7, 2020; Published: June 25, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Choe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files
Funding: HK and SY received a research grant (NRF-2010-0004016) from the National Research Foundation of Korea (URL: http://nrf.re.kr). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a clinical condition characterized by a cluster of abnormalities including: hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and central adiposity [1]. The presence of at least three of the five diagnostic criteria is defined as MetS [2].Metabolic syndrome becomes a global epidemic with the rise in obesity [3].
In several industrialized societies, MetS occur more frequently in women than in men. In United States, the prevalence of MetS is 36.6% in women and 32.8% in men [4]. The prevalence of obesity is greater in African American and Hispanic women than in non-Hispanic whites, suggesting that biological gender and ethnicity play a role in the development of metabolic diseases [5–7]. According to recent reports, 19.2% of men and 27.0% of women in China [8], 32.9% of women and 29.0% of men in Korea [9], 13.4% of women and 10.5% of men in Philippines [10], and 31.5% of women and 25.5% of men in Taiwan [11] are diagnosed with MetS, revealing generally a higher prevalence of MetS in women [12]. The gender difference is generally observed in midlife [11]. Furthermore, the severity of MetS progresses rapidly in middle-aged women due to the menopausal transition [13]. Considering the increasing risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women, improving the metabolic profile in women with MetS is crucial for reducing mortality and long-term morbidities.
Lifestyle modification or therapeutic lifestyle changes based on behavior therapies are an important and effective strategy for managing newly diagnosed MetS patients [1]. This involves changes in diet, physical activity, and self-monitoring [14]. In the presence of severe obesity with or without uncontrolled hyperglycemia, some researchers suggested metabolic surgery can be effective for a persistent MetS resolution [15, 16]. Evidence exists to support the notion that diet, exercise, and pharmacologic interventions may inhibit the progression of MetS to more severe chronic conditions, such as diabetes mellitus. Although there have been advances of preventive lifestyle interventions, a number of clinical and public health strategies have failed to achieve significant and sustainable changes in affected populations [17, 18]. Considering that perceived support from family members has positive effect on self-efficacy of adults [19], the role of family for lifestyle modifications is crucial as well.
Middle-aged and older women can be more vulnerable to lifestyle-related disorders, due to limited time and economic resources, compared to men in the same age groups [20]. However, men have a higher prevalence of individual MetS components [21]. Therefore, developing effective risk-reducing strategies for women with MetS requires an in-depth understanding of their specific context and experience with their management of MetS. In order to understand specific contexts and experiences, we explored gender-based differences in factors associated with cumulative probability of MetS resolution among newly diagnosed patients.
Materials and methods
Study design
This was a secondary analysis of a previous clinical trial study which explored the effectiveness of dietary counseling [22]. The primary study, which provided the data, is registered in the Clinical Research Information Service by Korea Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Republic of Korea (registration number: KCT0000275 and KCT 0000446). The primary study was approved for middle-aged (n = 500) and older (n = 360) adults. To explore gender-differences in MetS resolution in all adults, we used data of the extended study population of the primary research (both intervention and control groups) in our analysis. Briefly, otherwise healthy men and women aged 40–80 years who were diagnosed with MetS were recruited at 16 health facilities in 2010. MetS was defined by the NCEP-ATP III criteria for MetS and the Asia-Pacific standard for abdominal obesity [23]. According to the criteria, those who have ≥ 3 of the five components of MetS are defined to have MetS. We excluded patients who agreed to participate but provided incomplete information for core study questions in the survey and who had not provided signed consent for the study. We further excluded patients who were in treatment or on medication for MetS-related health conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes because any medical treatment for MetS-related conditions can be a confounder as it is associated with both exposure and outcome [24]. Finally, 637 participants were included for the health examination and survey and followed up for multiple post assessments for around 12 months (S1 Fig). The primary outcome of this study was MetS resolution, which was defined as having <3 MetS components within 12‐month of the treatment period. This study is a secondary analysis of anonymized data from the extended population of a primary study, which obtained informed consent from participants. This study was exempted from review by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Seoul National University.
Measurement of MetS components
For all participants, 5 MetS components were assessed at baseline and every visit which was within a 2–3 months-interval. Trained research assistants performed clinical and anthropometric measurements according to a standardized protocol. Blood pressure was measured with an automatic digital sphygmomanometer (TM-2655P, A&D, Tokyo, Japan). Measurements were made after participants being seated for at least 5 min in a chair with both feet on the floor. Determination of blood pressure is based upon the mean of two measurements separated by at least 2 min. Waist circumference was measured with a tape spring-tension measure at a level midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. Fasting blood samples were drawn and analyzed at KAHP laboratories. Fasting glucose, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol were measured using HITACHI 7600–110 (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan). Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants including age, education level, marital status, employment status, monthly income, social support, self-rated health, and average hours of sleep were recorded at baseline by trained interviewers.
Covariates
To consider potential confounding effect in the association between gender and MetS resolution, we included the following covariates in the model: age group (40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s), level of education (middle or lower, high school, college or university), household income (<$2,200, $2,200–5,500, and >$5,500), body mass index (BMI; <25, 25–30, and >30), current employment, smoking, alcohol drinking, living with partner, enrollment in health education classes, social support, sleep hours, moderate exercise (more than once a week), number of initial MetS components, and initial HbA1c (%).
Statistical analysis
Baseline sociodemographic and MetS characteristics were compared between men and women using the chi-square test for discrete variables and the t-test for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazard model including all variables was applied to calculate adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of MetS resolution. To identify gender-based difference in the association between variables and cumulative probability of MetS resolution, we tested interactions by gender for all covariates. All statistical analyses and plotting were performed using the R statistical software package (R Version 3.2.1).
Results
Among the 637 patients, 64.5% were women and the majority were aged between 50 and 60 years (Table 1). Within the observational period, 47.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 43.6, 51.5%) of participants achieved MetS resolution. Resolution rate was not different by gender (44.7% of men and 49.1% of women). Compared by gender, women participants were more likely to be older, have a lower household income, and doing moderate intensity exercise regularly. Men are more likely to be employed, more educated, currently smoking and drinking, compared to women. Although women were statistically significantly older, the observed difference was 2.8 years which was not considered clinically meaningful.
Patterns of change in MetS components during the study period differed between men and women (S2 Fig). Women showed a more profound decrease of hypertension and low HDL-cholesterol than men. In the multivariable analysis for the cumulative probability of MetS resolution within the study period, we observed multiplicative interactions by gender for current employment and sleep hours (S1 Table). Subgroup analysis by gender revealed different patterns of association between men and women (Table 2). Low household income (Hazard ratio = 2.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.13–6.08) and current employment (2.29, 1.26–4.13) were associated with higher cumulative probability of MetS resolution in men than in women. For women, however, longer sleep hours (1.18, 1.04–1.34) and living with a partner (1.58, 1.06–2.35) were positive predictors of MetS resolution within 12 months of observation (Fig 1). Overweight (0.63, 0.44–0.89), but not obesity, was associated with lower cumulative probability of resolution. Level of education, current smoking, alcohol use, enrollment in health education classes, social support, and initial HbA1c were not associated with time to resolution during the observation period for both men and women.
Time to metabolic syndrome resolution (days) stratified by living with partner (n = 637), (A) Men and (B) Women.
Discussion
We observed an interaction by gender in the association between clinical characteristics and MetS resolution within 1 year. There were gender-based differences in predictors for cumulative probability of resolution among newly diagnosed MetS patients. Household income and current employment were positive predictors in men while longer sleep hours and living with a partner were positive predictors in women. Although men and women had substantially different general characteristics, the MetS resolution rate among them was similar. This finding would provide empirical evidence for gender-based differences in prognostic predictors of MetS resolution within the first year of diagnosis.
Gender differences in the prediction of the prognosis of MetS have been noted in previous studies. Although the findings were inconsistent due to context and study settings, responses to intervention or treatment of MetS have been different between men and women in some of the studies. Metformin did not have effect over placebo in women but not in men in a study of intensive lifestyle intervention and metformin therapy [25]. In a prospective study of middle-age adults, C-reactive protein (CRP) was a significant predictor for the development of MetS in women [26]. On the other hand, in the study of MetS patients undergoing bariatric surgery, women were more likely to resolve the condition in 12 months compared to men after controlling for postoperative weight loss [27]. Yet the biological or sociocultural mechanism of this gender-difference in predictive factors for MetS prognosis remains to be elucidated, it would suggest gender-specific approach would be necessary in treatment of MetS patients.
The modification effect by gender of the patient in the association between living with partner and time to MetS normalization is noteworthy. In general, marriage has been reported to be advantageous to a better metabolic profile [28, 29]. Several studies have demonstrated gender-based difference in the association between marriage and better health. A Taiwanese study showed that having a stable marriage decreased the risk of cardiovascular disorders for middle-aged women, but not for men and young women [30]. The gender-based difference is postulated to be mediated by differential marital distress in these gender and age groups. In a study of English middle-aged couples, association between marital distress and the MetS remained significant for women but not for men [31]. In a study of middle-aged women, the risk of MetS in widowed and martially dissatisfied women was similar to that in divorced or widowed women, but higher than that in martially satisfied [29]. In the context of middle-aged Korean women, with historical gender inequality in social activities and employment, living with marital partner would have provided a more stable socioeconomic status compared to single women. On the other hand, this might have been not significant benefit for married middle-aged men. This finding requires validation by future studies of countries with a similar socioeconomic status.
This study had several limitations: First, as a small group of retrospective cohorts in primary health clinics, our study population may not be representative for general population especially for men. And the prevalence of severe obesity (defined as BMI ≥35 kg/m2) was 1% in our population which is far lower than that of other studies. Given the higher incidence of MetS in women in previous reports of Asian population [8–11] and very low prevalence of severe obesity in Korean adult ≥19 years old (0.2–0.5%) [32], we believe the findings of our study population reflect general characteristics of Korean adults. In addition, general characteristics of study participants such as mean age at the time of diagnosis and number of MetS components, are largely similar to those of previous studies, the finding of our study would still have clinical implications applicable to other populations. Second, objective measurement of individual adherence to health provider’s advice for diet or exercise was not available. Intermediate outcome measures for individual compliance to lifestyle modification would provide more explanation to the causal relationship between the baseline social factors and MetS resolution. We believe this study minimized the residual confounding effect caused by different adherence or compliance by including enrollment in health education classes and self-reported moderate exercise as covariates.
Conclusions
There was gender-difference in predictors of MetS resolution within 12 months of follow-up. These findings will facilitate further exploration on gender-specific approach for more effective intervention of MetS.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Final selection of the study population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234035.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Fig. Evolution of MetS components in the study population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234035.s002
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Hazard ratios for achieving resolution of metabolic syndrome during the observation period (N = 637).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234035.s003
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Korea Association of Health Promotion for participating in intervention development and implementation, facilitating the data collection process, and granting access to the data.
References
- 1. Dalle Grave R, Calugi S, Centis E, Marzocchi R, El Ghoch M, Marchesini G. Lifestyle modification in the management of the metabolic syndrome: achievements and challenges. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy. 2010;3:373–85. Epub 2010/01/01. pmid:21437107; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3047997.
- 2. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640–5. pmid:19805654.
- 3. Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH. Increasing prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among u.s. Adults. Diabetes care. 2004;27(10):2444–9. Epub 2004/09/29. pmid:15451914.
- 4. Aguilar M, Bhuket T, Torres S, Liu B, Wong RJ. PRevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the united states, 2003–2012. Jama. 2015;313(19):1973–4. pmid:25988468
- 5. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. Jama. 2010;303(3):235–41. Epub 2010/01/15. pmid:20071471.
- 6. Prevention CfDCa. Differences in prevalence of obesity among black, white, and Hispanic adults—United States, 2006–2008. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2009;58(27):740–4. Epub 2009/07/18. pmid:19609247.
- 7. Simonsen SE, Digre KB, Ralls B, Mukundente V, Davis FA, Rickard S, et al. A gender-based approach to developing a healthy lifestyle and healthy weight intervention for diverse Utah women. Eval Program Plann. 2015;51:8–16. pmid:25559947.
- 8. Ri Li WL, Lun Zhijun, Zhang Huiping, Sun Zhi, Kanu Joseph Sam, Qiu Shuang, Cheng Yi. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in mainland china: a meta-analysis of published studies. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(296):1–10. pmid:27039079
- 9. Lim S, Shin H, Song JH, Kwak SH, Kang SM, Won Yoon J, et al. Increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Korea: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 1998–2007. Diabetes care. 2011;34(6):1323–8. Epub 2011/04/21. pmid:21505206; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3114326.
- 10. Morales DD, Punzalan FE, Paz-Pacheco E, Sy RG, Duante CA. Metabolic syndrome in the Philippine general population: prevalence and risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes & vascular disease research. 2008;5(1):36–43. Epub 2008/04/10. pmid:18398811.
- 11. Yeh CJ, Chang HY, Pan WH. Time trend of obesity, the metabolic syndrome and related dietary pattern in Taiwan: from NAHSIT 1993–1996 to NAHSIT 2005–2008. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2011;20(2):292–300. Epub 2011/06/15. pmid:21669598.
- 12. Ranasinghe P, Mathangasinghe Y, Jayawardena R, Hills AP, Misra A. Prevalence and trends of metabolic syndrome among adults in the asia-pacific region: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):101. Epub 2017/01/23. pmid:28109251; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5251315.
- 13. Gurka MJ, Vishnu A, Santen RJ, DeBoer MD. Progression of Metabolic Syndrome Severity During the Menopausal Transition. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016;5(8). Epub 2016/08/05. pmid:27487829.
- 14. Wadden TA, Webb VL, Moran CH, Bailer BA. Lifestyle modification for obesity: new developments in diet, physical activity, and behavior therapy. Circulation. 2012;125(9):1157–70. Epub 2012/03/07. pmid:22392863; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3313649.
- 15. Batsis JA, Romero-Corral A, Collazo-Clavell ML, Sarr MG, Somers VK, Lopez-Jimenez F. Effect of bariatric surgery on the metabolic syndrome: a population-based, long-term controlled study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(8):897–907. pmid:18674474.
- 16. Villamizar N, Pryor AD. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of metabolic surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Obes. 2011;2011:790683-. Epub 11/14. pmid:21113308.
- 17. Thomas SL, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, Herbert D, Komesaroff PA. Being 'fat' in today's world: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia. Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. 2008;11(4):321–30. Epub 2008/08/08. pmid:18684133.
- 18. Sarris J, Nishi D, Xiang YT, Su KP, Bannatyne A, Oliver G, et al. Implementation of psychiatric-focused lifestyle medicine programs in Asia. Asia-Pacific psychiatry: official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists. 2015;7(4):345–54. Epub 2015/09/26. pmid:26403310.
- 19. Yoo S. The context of perceived and desired social support among Korean older adults. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2013;18(1):47–55. pmid:22533482
- 20.
Bird CE, Rieker PP. The Effects of Constrained Choices and Social Policies: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
- 21. Rochlani Y, Pothineni NV, Mehta JL. Metabolic Syndrome: Does it Differ Between Women and Men? Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. 2015;29(4):329–38. pmid:25994831
- 22. Yoon NH, Yoo S, Kim H, Han Y. Routine Screening and Consultation Facilitate Improvement of Metabolic Syndrome. Journal of Korean medical science. 2015;30(8):1092–100. Epub 2015/08/05. pmid:26240487; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4520940.
- 23.
Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421. Epub 2002/12/18. pmid:12485966.
- 24. Choe S-A, Kim JY, Ro YS, Cho S-I. Women are less likely than men to achieve optimal glycemic control after 1 year of treatment: A multi-level analysis of a Korean primary care cohort. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196719-e. pmid:29718952.
- 25. Orchard TJ, Temprosa M, Goldberg R, et al. The effect of metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention on the metabolic syndrome: The diabetes prevention program randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005;142(8):611–9. pmid:15838067
- 26. Han TS, Sattar N, Williams K, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Lean ME, Haffner SM. Prospective study of C-reactive protein in relation to the development of diabetes and metabolic syndrome in the Mexico City Diabetes Study. Diabetes care. 2002;25(11):2016–21. Epub 2002/10/29. pmid:12401749.
- 27.
Agrawal P, Khoury H, Shpanskaya K, Rivas H, Morton JM. Gender differences in the prevalence and remission of metabolic syndrome for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract Annual Meeting abstract2017.
- 28. Montano D. Association Between Socioeconomic Determinants and the Metabolic Syndrome in the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)—A Mediation Analysis. The review of diabetic studies: RDS. 2017;14(2–3):279–94. Epub 2017/11/18. pmid:29145538; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6115006.
- 29. Troxel WM, Matthews KA, Gallo LC, Kuller LH. Marital quality and occurrence of the metabolic syndrome in women. Archives of internal medicine. 2005;165(9):1022–7. Epub 2005/05/11. pmid:15883241.
- 30. Liao CM, Lin CM. Life Course Effects of Socioeconomic and Lifestyle Factors on Metabolic Syndrome and 10-Year Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Longitudinal Study in Taiwan Adults. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(10). Epub 2018/10/12. pmid:30301155.
- 31. Whisman MA, Uebelacker LA, Settles TD. Marital distress and the metabolic syndrome: linking social functioning with physical health. Journal of family psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43). 2010;24(3):367–70. Epub 2010/06/16. pmid:20545410.
- 32. Oh SW. Recent Epidemiological Changes in Korean Obesity. The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research 2017;17(2):62–5. https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2017.17.2.62