Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin from the terricolous polypore Albatrellus flettii suppress KRAS expression in human colon cancer cells

Almas Yaqoob; Wai Ming Li; Victor Liu; Chuyi Wang; Sebastian Mackedenski; Linda E. Tackaberry; Hugues B. Massicotte; Keith N. Egger; Kerry Reimer; Chow H. Lee

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231948

Abstract

In our search for bioactive mushrooms native to British Columbia, we determined that the ethanol extracts from fruiting bodies of the terrestrial polypore Albatrellus flettii had potent anti-cell viability activity. Using bioassay-guided fractionation, mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance, we successfully isolated three known compounds (grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin). These compounds represent the major anti-cell viability components from the ethanol extracts of A. flettii. We also identified a novel biological activity for these compounds, specifically in down-regulating KRAS expression in two human colon cancer cell lines. Relatively little is known about the anti-cell viability activity and mechanism of action of confluentin. For the first time, we show the ability of confluentin to induce apoptosis and arrest the cell cycle at the G2/M phase in SW480 human colon cancer cells. The oncogenic insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1) has been previously shown to regulate KRAS mRNA expression in colon cancer cells, possibly through its ability to bind to the KRAS transcript. Using a fluorescence polarization assay, we show that confluentin dose-dependently inhibits the physical interaction between KRAS RNA and full-length IMP1. The inhibition also occurs with truncated IMP1 containing the KH1 to KH4 domain (KH1to4 IMP1), but not with the di-domain KH3 and KH4 (KH3&4 IMP1). In addition, unlike the control antibiotic neomycin, grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin do not bind to KRAS RNA. These results suggest that confluentin inhibits IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction by binding to the KH1&2 di-domains of IMP1. Since the molecular interaction between IMP1 and its target RNAs is a pre-requisite for the oncogenic function of IMP1, confluentin should be further explored as a potential inhibitor of IMP1 in vivo.

Citation: Yaqoob A, Li WM, Liu V, Wang C, Mackedenski S, Tackaberry LE, et al. (2020) Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin from the terricolous polypore Albatrellus flettii suppress KRAS expression in human colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0231948. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948

Editor: A R M Ruhul Amin, Marshall University, UNITED STATES

Received: August 19, 2019; Accepted: April 3, 2020; Published: May 5, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Yaqoob et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council Discovery grant number 227158 (CHL), Canada Foundation for Innovation grant number 34711 (CHL) and UNBC Research Project Award (AY).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

There have been relatively few studies exploring the medicinal potential of compounds from wild mushrooms native to British Columbia (BC), Canada. Therefore, we have begun to study medicinal properties of selected native fungi, focusing on three bio-assays relevant to cancer: anti-cell viability, immuno-stimulatory and anti-inflammatory activities [1,2]. Screening over one hundred mushroom species occurring in north-central BC, we have documented that approximately 25% possess potent anti-cell viability activity. Among the mushrooms that exhibited some of the most potent anti-cell viability activity was Albatrellus flettii and, specifically, its ethanol extracts.

Albatrellus flettii (family Albatrellaceae) is an attractive terricolous polypore, often with a distinct blue-gray colouring on the cap; it is commonly found in western North America ranging from Alaska to California and Mexico, including throughout BC, Alberta, Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Wyoming [3]. Although there are several studies on the phytochemistry of the genus Albatrellus [4–9], only two reported on A. flettii [10,11]. The first focused predominantly on the isolation of meroterpenoid pigments responsible for the blue color of A. flettii [10]. In the second study, three compounds (grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin) were isolated from A. flettii (collected from Oregon), and these were documented to have anti-bacterial activities against Bacillus cereus and Enterococcus faecalis [11]. Spectroscopic data were not provided and there was no evidence of purity of compounds. To date, A. flettii has not been systematically studied for its anti-cell viability activity against human cancer cells nor have compounds been isolated with such activity.

KRAS is a frequently mutated oncogene in human cancer cells with the highest prevalence in pancreatic adenocarcinomas (90%), colorectal cancers (45%) and lung cancers (35%) [12]. The KRAS gene encodes a small membrane protein which is active when bound to GTP and consequently activates a number of downstream biochemical pathways leading to cell growth, differentiation and survival. Mutated KRAS is locked onto the GTP-bound “on” state and continuously activates the downstream biochemical effectors that can lead to tumorigenesis [13,14]. Recent developments in finding RAS inhibitors include: (i) a bicyclic diterpenoid lactone which blocks GDP-GTP exchange and inhibits both the wild-type and oncogenic KRAS signaling by binding to the switch regions of RAS [15], and (ii) inhibitors which irreversibly target a type of KRAS mutant by forming a covalent attachment [16,17]. Recent studies using preclinical mouse models have shown regression of KRAS-driven tumors using highly potent and specific siRNA [18–20] and antisense oligonucleotide [21] targeting KRAS expression. This suggests that inhibition of KRAS expression is an effective approach in anti-KRAS therapy.

In the course of our search for anti-cell viability metabolites, we isolated three known major compounds (grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin) from the ethanol extracts of fruiting bodies of A. flettii using a bioassay-guided fractionation approach. We report here, for the first time, that grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin suppressed KRAS expression in human colon cancer cells. Confluentin also inhibited the physical association between KRAS RNA and insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1). This suggests its further potential to inhibit these oncogenic biomolecules in cell lines and animal models.

Materials and methods

General experimental procedures

1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 300 MHz NMR spectrometer with a 5 mm Kimble NMR tube (Rockwood, TN, USA). All HPLC analyses were performed on Agilent 1260 Infinity Systems with UV detector, and mass spectrometry were done using Agilent 6120 Single Quad MS. For analytical purposes, a reverse phase column Phenomenex Aqua^® C18 (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used. Solvent A: water, solvent B: acetonitrile, gradient system: 90% B increasing by 10% every 5 min for 15 min maintaining at 90% B for 20 min, flow rate = 1.0 mL min^-1, UV detection at 279 nm. For semi-preparative purification, an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XBD-C18 (9.4 x 250 mm, 5 μm) was used. Solvent A was water and solvent B was acetonitrile. The following conditions were used: gradient system, 90% B for 20 min; flow rate = 2.0 mL min^-1; UV detection at 279 nm. HPLC grade solvents were purchased from BDH (Mississauga, ON, Canada). Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Lonza (Walkersville, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Grand Island, NY, USA). KRAS mouse monoclonal antibodies (1:500 dilution) were from EMD Millipore (MABS194 clone 234–4.2; Etobicoke, ON, Canada) and Abnova (H00003845-M01 clone 3B10-2F2; Taoyuan City, Taiwan), and the mouse monoclonal GAPDH antibody (G8795; clone GAPDH-71.1) (1:10,000 dilution) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cleaved Caspase-3 antibody (Asp175; #9661) (1:1000 dilution) was from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (MA, USA).

Fungal collection and identification

Fruiting bodies of A. flettii were collected near the Twin Falls Recreation Site, Smithers, BC, Canada, on September 3, 2016 (CL128) and September 20, 2017 (CL151). Voucher specimens for these collections were deposited at the University of Northern British Columbia, Canada. The identity of A. flettii was confirmed using previously described genetic protocols [1,2,22]. The DNA sequence of collections CL128 and CL151 were identical and had highest sequence similarity to a collection of A. flettii GenBank JF899544.1 (99.82% identity/100% coverage).

Extraction and isolation

Albatrellus flettii specimens were sequentially extracted with 80% ethanol, 50% methanol, water and 5% NaOH as previously described [1,2]. Solvents were completely removed by rotovap and powdered extracts were obtained by lyophilization. The 5% NaOH extract (E4) was pH neutralized and dialyzed in water before subjected to lyophilization. The 80% ethanol (E1) and 50% methanol (E2) extracts were resuspended in methanol while the water (E3) and 5% NaOH (E4) extracts were resuspended in water.

For the isolation of compounds, oven-dried and powdered A. flettii fruiting bodies (70 g) were extracted with 80% ethanol at room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was evaporated and lyophilized to obtain a crude EtOH extract (7.1 g) that was resuspended in CHCl₃ and then partitioned with water (1:1). The lower layer containing CHCl₃ (3.2 g of solid material recovered) had anti-cell viability activity; it was subjected to five runs (640 mg/run at 80 mg/mL) of Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography (1000 x 26 mm i.d., in methanol) to yield 50 fractions (10 mL per fraction). Fractions 30–36, which exhibited anti-cell viability activity, were first subjected to an analytical HPLC reverse phase column Phenomenex Aqua^® C18. Based on the UV spectra overlay, compounds eluting at 9.7 min, 13.5 min and 23.5 min were the most abundant (S1 Fig) and exhibited anti-cell viability activity. The remaining fractions 30–36 from Sephadex LH-20 column were subjected to semi-preparative HPLC purification using an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XBD-C18 column. The compound obtained at the retention t_R = 9.5 min was later confirmed by MS (S2 Fig) and NMR (S3–S6 Figs) to be grifolin. The compound obtained at the retention t_R = 13.5 min was later confirmed by MS (S7 Fig) and NMR (S8–S11 Figs) to be neogrifolin. The compound obtained at the retention t_R = 23.5 min was later confirmed by MS (S12 Fig) and NMR (S13–S18 Figs) to be confluentin. Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to make a 50 mM stock solution for biological assays.

Cytotoxicity assay

The following cell lines purchased from American Type Culture Collection were used: HeLa (cervix epithelioid carcinoma; CCL-2) and SW480 (colon adenocarcinoma; CCL-228). The cell line HT29 (colon adenocarcinoma) was obtained from Dr. Ranjana Bird (UNBC, 2014). The cytotoxic MTT assay was used as previously described [1,2,22]. Briefly, cells were plated at a density of 1.5 x 10⁴ cells/well in 96-well plates. After 24 hours, cells were treated with various concentrations (1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 mg/mL) of crude extracts E1, E2, E3 and E4 for 48 hours. Water was used as control for E3 and E4 while methanol (5%) was used as control for E1 and E2. Absorbance data were expressed relative to the respective controls, water or 5% methanol, taken as 100% cell viability. For studies with compounds, cells were treated with various concentrations (80, 60, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 μM) of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin or with 0.1% DMSO for 48 hours. All absorbance data were expressed relative to the control, 0.1% DMSO, taken as 100% cell viability. We have previously used 25 μM cis-platinum, a known inducer of apoptosis, as a positive control and showed that 95% anti-cell viability was achieved.

Western blot analysis

Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2.5 x 10⁵ cells/well and treated with grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin or with 2% DMSO for 24 and 48 hours. Cell lysates were prepared as previously described [23]. Protein samples were resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. BLUelf prestained protein ladder (FroggaBio) was used. Anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1:4,000, Promega) was used as secondary antibody. All blots were visualized using chemiluminescent detection system with the FluorChem Q Imager (ProteinSimple, CA, USA) and analyzed using the AlphaView Q software (ProteinSimple).

Fluorescence polarization analysis

A fluorescent polarization method to study the physical interaction between IMP1 and KRAS RNA is reported here for the first time. The method employs a recombinant IMP-1 protein and fluorescent-labeled 44-nt KRAS RNA. The preparation of recombinant full-length wild-type IMP1 protein and truncated IMP1 protein KH34 (containing only KH3 and KH4 domains) has been previously described [23]. The following were mixed in a Thermo Scientific micro-Fluor 384-well microplate: 8 μL protein, 3 μL Thermo Scientific 44-nt fluorescein labeled KRAS Probe (5’AUGGAGAAACCUGUCUCUUGGAUAUUCUCGACACAGCAGGUCAU-6-FL-3’) and 4 μL binding buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4, 12.5 mM EDTA pH 8, 25% glycerol, 0.01% Triton-X and H₂O). The 39-nt fluorescein labeled CD44 probe was 5’AAAUUAGGGCCCAAU UAAUAAUCAGCAAGAAUUUGAUCG-6-FL-3’. The final concentration of IMP1 and KRAS probe was 300 nM and 10 nM, respectively. To each well, 4 μL of grifolin, neogrifolin, confluentin or 5% DMSO was added for a final concentration of 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 or 100 μM. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min prior to reading at 485/20 nm excitation and 528/20 nm emission using the Bio-Tek Synergy 2 plate reader.

Flow cytometry apoptosis and cell cycle analyses

Cells were plated at 2.5 x 10⁵ cells/well in 6-well plates and treated with grifolin, confluentin or 2% DMSO for 24 hours. Untreated cells were included as control. Cells were trypsinized followed by centrifugation and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline. Live cells were stained with PE Annexin V and 7-AAD according to the manufacturer’s instructions for Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen) and analyzed by flow cytometry using a BD FACSMelody cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and BD FACSChorus software (V 1.0). For cell cycle analyses, BD cycletest plus DNA reagent kit was used.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

Human KRAS (accession # NM_033360) cDNA purchased from OriGene Technologies Inc. was used as template for the generation of PCR-amplified DNA fragments. The primer set used for amplifying KRAS cDNA nts 1–185 were: forward, 5’-GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGATGACTGAATATAAACTT-3’ and reverse, 5’-TCATGACCTGCTGTGTCG-3’. The primer sets for amplifying 5’end and 3’end truncated KRAS cDNAs corresponding to nts 1–185 has been described previously [24]. One μg of PCR-amplified DNA templates was used directly for in-vitro transcription by T7 RNA polymerase as previously described [23–25]. The purified, radiolabeled RNA was phenol/chloroform extracted followed by ethanol precipitation. Specific activity of the RNA was then determined by scintillation counting. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was conducted in essentially the same manner as previously described [23–26]. Radiolabeled RNAs (20,000 cpm) were used and IMP1 concentrations varied from 0 to 540 nM. Free and bound RNAs were resolved in 8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel and visualized using Cyclone Storage Phosphor Imager System (Packard Instrument). Images were analyzed and quantified using Optiquant software version 4.0.

Statistical analysis

The cytotoxic MTT assays were performed in triplicate (3 wells/treatment) and the absorbance reading from the respective control was taken as 100% cell viability. Two additional experiments were conducted and the mean IC₅₀ values from three independent experiments (n = 3) were obtained. For Western blot analysis, the intensity of KRAS and Cleaved Caspase-3 bands were normalized to their respective GAPDH bands and then expressed relative to the control DMSO (taken as 1.0). After additional biological replicates were conducted, one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test was performed to compare the drug-treated samples with DMSO-treated samples (n = 3 or 5). Similarly for fluorescence polarization and flow cytometry experiments, three independent experiments (n = 3) were performed. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 (La Jolla, CA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Isolation and identification of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin

Albatrellus flettii specimens were sequentially extracted with 80% ethanol, 50% methanol, water and 5% NaOH. The water (E3) and 5% NaOH (E4) extracts displayed weak anti-cell viability activity while the 80% ethanol (E1) and 50% methanol (E2) extracts showed potent anti-cell viability activity against HeLa human cervical cancer cells (Fig 1). At and above 0.4 mg/mL, both E1 and E2 showed increase in cell viability and this is due to the fact that they contain constituents that react with the medium or MTT to produce colored solutions—thereby producing false positive results. Similar effects have been observed for a number of fungal extracts [2]. Consequently, we focused the study on the isolation of anti-cell viability compounds from the 80% ethanol extract. Chloroform:H₂O (1:1) extraction, Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography, HPLC-MS (S2, S7 and S12 Figs) and NMR (S3–S6, S8–S11 and S13–S18 Figs) analyses of the ethanol extracts led to the isolation and identification of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin (Fig 2) as the three major anti-cell viability compounds. Based on HPLC UV spectra (S1 Fig), the abundance of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin was estimated to be 32.6%, 52.0% and 8.1%, respectively. A previous study cited anti-bacterial activity for grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin isolated from A. flettii, however, abundance values were not reported [11].

Download:

Fig 1. Dose-dependent effect of crude extracts from A. flettii on the viability of HeLa human cervical cancer cells.

Cells were treated for 48 hours with various concentrations of E1 (80% ethanol), E2 (50% methanol), E3 (water) and E4 (5% NaOH) extracts from A. flettii. The concentrations of extracts used were: 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.1 mg/mL. Anti-cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Results shown represent two biological replicates. Error bars are standard deviation (S.D.).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g001

Download:

Fig 2. Chemical structure of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin isolated from A. flettii.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g002

Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin are cytotoxic to human colon cancer cells

We evaluated grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin for anti-cell viability activity against HeLa cells and two human colon cancer cell lines SW480 and HT29. Grifolin has IC₅₀ values of 27.4 ± 2.2 μM (n = 3), 35.4 ± 2.4 μM (n = 4) and 30.7 ± 1.0 μM (n = 3) against HeLa, SW480 and HT29 cells, respectively (Fig 3). This is consistent with a previous report of IC₅₀ values of 34 μM and 27 μM for grifolin from Albratrellus confluens on HeLa and SW480 cells [27]. Neogrifolin has IC₅₀ values of 24.3 ± 2.5 μM (n = 3), 34.6 ± 5.9 μM (n = 4) and 30.1 ± 4.0 μM (n = 4) against HeLa, SW480 and HT29 cells, respectively (Fig 3). Although there are no reports of anti-cell viability activity by neogrifolin on HeLa, SW480 and HT29 cells, it has been shown to have IC₅₀ values of 25–50 μM against human osteosarcoma cells [28]. Confluentin has IC₅₀ values of 25.9 ± 2.9 μM (n = 3), 33.5 ± 4.0 μM (n = 3) and 25.8 ± 4.1 μM (n = 3) against HeLa, SW480 and HT29 cells, respectively (Fig 3). Prior to the present study, confluentin had not been assessed on human colon cancer cells. Confluentin from A. ovinus has been reported to have IC₅₀ values in the range of 15–23 μM on the following human cancer cell lines: HL-60, SMMC 7712, A-549 and MCF-7 [5]. In summary, grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin isolated from A. flettii have anti-cell viability activity against HeLa human cervical cancer cells and two human colon cancer cell lines, SW480 and HT29. The IC₅₀ values reported here are similar to those reported by others for these compounds derived from fungal species in the same genus, tested against either the same or different cancer cell lines. We have not assessed grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin on normal cells immortalized in culture. It is highly likely that these compounds are also cytotoxic to immortalized normal cells.

Download:

Fig 3. Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin inhibited cell viability in human cancer cells.

HeLa human cervical cancer cells and human colon cancer cells (SW480 and HT29) were treated with various concentrations of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin for 48 hours. The concentrations of compounds used were: 80, 60, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625 μM. Cell viability was determined using the cytotoxic MTT assay. Each dose was tested in triplicate in each experiment and the data shown is a representation of at least three independent experiments (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g003

Confluentin induces apoptosis and arrests cell cycle in human colon cancer cells

Grifolin, mostly isolated from A. confluens, has been extensively studied for its anti-cell viability mechanism [27,29–34]. Similarly, neogrifolin, also isolated from A. confluens, has been shown to induce release of cytochrome c and to activate caspases 3 and 9 leading to apoptosis [28]. In contrast, no study exists on the anti-cell viability mechanism of confluentin. Here, we used flow cytometry and Western blot analyses to assess the effect of confluentin on cell apoptosis. After 24 hours of treatment with 50 μM confluentin, 30% of SW480 cells underwent apoptosis compared to 8.4% of cells treated with 2% DMSO (Fig 4A) and such an effect was confirmed with additional experiments (Fig 4B). We also found that 50 μM confluentin increased Cleaved Caspase-3 expression 2.5-fold compared to DMSO-treated cells (Fig 4C and 4D), further confirming the ability of confluentin to induce apoptosis.

Download:

Fig 4. Effect of confluentin on apoptosis in SW480 human colon cancer cells.

(A) SW480 cells were treated with 2% DMSO or 50 μM confluentin for 24 hours after which cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to assess for necrosis (Q1), late apoptosis (Q2), early apoptosis (Q3) and live cells (Q4). Data shown represents three independent experiments (n = 3). (B) The percentages of cells in late apoptosis (Q2) treated with 2% DMSO or 50 μM confluentin from three independent experiments were combined and shown to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). (C) As in (A), SW480 cells treated with 2% DMSO or 50 μM confluentin for 24 hours followed by isolation of cell lysates. Western blot analyses were performed and data shown is a representative from five independent experiments (n = 5). (D) The level of Cleaved Caspase-3 in confluentin-treated cells was normalized to that of GAPDH and expressed relative to DMSO-treated cells (taken as 1.0). The plotted graph is from five independent experiments. For statistical analysis, a Student’s t-test was performed (p < 0.05). Error bars are S.D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g004

Using flow cytometry, we also assessed the effect of confluentin on the cell cycle in SW480 cells. We determined that approximately 10% of cells were arrested at G2/M phase following 24 hours treatment with 50 μM confluentin compared to 4.6% of cells when treated with the control 2% DMSO (Fig 5A). Two additional biological replicates confirmed that confluentin significantly arrests SW480 cells at the G2/M phase. Our study also showed that confluentin had no effect on cells at the G1 and S phase (Fig 5B).

Download:

Fig 5. Effect of confluentin on cell cycle in SW480 human colon cancer cells.

(A) SW480 cells treated with 2% DMSO or 50 μM confluentin were analyzed by flow cytometry for cell-cycle distribution. (B) The relative percentages of cells in different phases of cell cycle were combined from three independent experiments (n = 3) and plotted as shown. Two-way ANOVA was performed and asterisk indicates significant differences (p < 0.001). Error bars are S.D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g005

In summary, we report here for the first time that confluentin induces apoptosis and arrests the cell cycle at the G2/M phase, both mechanisms that could contribute to anti-cell viability activity on SW480 cells (Fig 3).

Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin suppress KRAS expression

KRAS is an elusive oncotarget and much effort continues to focus on targeting it by directly inhibiting its function, biogenesis and expression [14,35]. Furthermore, constitutively active KRAS has been linked to increased cell proliferation [36–38]. Therefore, we investigated whether grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin have any effect on the expression of KRAS in human colon cancer cells. Upon treatment for 48 hours at 50 μM, all three compounds showed significant inhibition on KRAS expression in SW480 cells, which carry the G12V KRAS mutation (Fig 6). After 24 hours of treatment, only grifolin and confluentin had a significant effect. Although not statistically significant, neogrifolin also showed an inhibitory pattern at 24 hours (Fig 6). In addition, we assessed the three compounds on KRAS expression in the HT29 human colon cancer cell line, which carries the wild-type KRAS. At 20 and 50 μM, we found similar inhibition on KRAS expression by grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin (S19 Fig). We also determined whether confluentin, the most effective amongst the three compounds, had any effect on KRAS mRNA level in SW480 cells. Our results showed that confluentin had no significant effect on KRAS mRNA levels at 24 and 48 hours after treatment (Fig 6C). Taken together, our findings suggest that grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin decrease KRAS expression at the level of translation rather than at the level of mRNA degradation.

Download:

Fig 6. Effect of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin on KRAS expression in SW480 human colon cancer cells.

SW480 cells were treated with 2% DMSO or 50 μM grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin for 24 and 48 hours. (A) A representative immunoblot is shown. (B) KRAS band intensity was normalized to their respective GAPDH intensity and expressed relative to the control DMSO (taken as 1.0). Data shown are mean ± SD pooled from three independent experiments (n = 3). * = p < 0.01 versus DMSO. (C) Total RNA isolated from treated cells was subjected to quantitative real-time PCR. The level of KRAS mRNA from confluentin-treated cells was normalized to that of GAPDH mRNA and expressed relative to that of DMSO-treated cells. Data shown was pooled from three biological replicates (n = 3). A student’s t-test was performed and error bars are S.D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g006

In summary, these results are the first to show the ability of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin to suppress KRAS expression in human colon cancer cells regardless of whether the cells carry KRAS mutation or the wild-type KRAS. Further experiments are clearly required to decipher the exact mechanism whereby these compounds suppress KRAS expression.

Establishing a fluorescence polarization method to study IMP1-RNA interactions

One of the major criteria for successful use of fluorescence polarization (FP) to study nucleic acid-protein interaction is the requirement of a small molecular weight fluorescently-labeled substrate, which in this case is an RNA [39]. Using a gel shift assay, we mapped a number of RNA substrates to determine the smallest region still capable of binding to IMP1 [25,26], including CD44 [40] and KRAS RNA [24]. We previously showed that a 35-nt CD44 RNA spanning nts 2862–2896 is the minimal region capable of binding IMP1 [40]. Based on a report that IMP1 has high affinity for the coding region and 3’UTR of KRAS mRNA [38], we proceeded to map the smallest region(s) of KRAS mRNA that can bind IMP1. Our results show that nts 1–185 has one of the highest affinities for IMP1 with a Kd of 171 ± 18 nM [24]. In this study, nts 1–185 of KRAS mRNA was further mapped by truncation from the 5’end and 3’end and results are shown in S20 Fig. Gel shift analysis of seven truncated fragments show that nts 93–185 is the region of IMP1 binding. Further mapping of nts 93–185 finally revealed the 39-nt KRAS RNA spanning nts 147–185 as the smallest region that still had affinity for IMP1 (S20 Fig). Based on these studies, we designed a 39-nt CD44 RNA spanning nts 2862–2900 and a 44-nt KRAS RNA spanning nts 142–185 for use in the FP assay. These RNAs were commercially synthesized and labeled with fluorescein at the 3’end. It was important to first establish the validity of our FP assay. Using gel shift assay, we previously showed that IMP1 variant KH1-2 with point mutation at the GXXG motif in KH1 and KH2 domains had completely lost the ability to bind to CD44 RNA while the KH3-4 variant had binding affinity comparable to that of the WT [23]. KH3 variant, a single point mutation at the GXXG motif, had significantly reduced affinity for CD44 RNA [23]. As shown in Fig 7A, the relative affinity of KH1-2, KH3-4 and KH3 variants for the 39-nt fluorescein-labeled CD44 RNA as compared to the WT IMP1 was remarkably similar to that of gel shift assay. The KH1-2 variant did not increase fluorescence anisotropy (FA) units, even at 1000 nM, while the KH3 variant showed significantly reduced FA units compared to the WT. In the FP assay, we found that the KH3-4 variant had slightly reduced affinity for CD44 RNA compared to the WT IMP1 (Fig 7A). The small deviation could be attributed to the fact that a larger 194-nt CD44 RNA was used in the gel shift assay [23]. To further validate our FP assay, we used the 44-nt KRAS RNA. In the gel shift assay, we found that all the KH variants, single or double point mutations, had significantly reduced or lost the ability to bind to KRAS RNA [24,25]. Fig 7B shows that KH1-2 variant had no affinity while KH3-4 and KH3 variants had significantly reduced ability to bind to the 44-nt KRAS RNA as determined by FP. Again, this is consistent with the results from the gel shift assay [24,25]. In summary, we have successfully established a reliable FP assay that recapitulates the gel shift assay and therefore can be conveniently used to study the IMP1-RNA interaction.

Download:

Fig 7. Establishing the fluorescence polarization method to study IMP1-RNA interaction.

Fluorescence polarization analysis of the interaction between the wild-type IMP1 and its point-mutation variants (KH1-2, KH3-4 and KH3) with the fluorescein-labeled 39-nt CD44 (A) and the 44-nt KRAS RNAs (B). Results shown are representative of three separate experiments (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g007

Confluentin inhibits IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction

KRAS expression and cell survival in colon cancer cells can be regulated by binding IMP1 protein to KRAS mRNA [38]. Using the established FP assay, we showed that the full-length IMP1, truncated IMP1 containing only the KH1 to KH4 domains (KH1to4 IMP1), or only the KH3 and KH4 di-domain (KH3&4 IMP1), dose-dependently bind to 44-nt fluorescein-labeled KRAS RNA (Fig 8). We then assessed the dose-dependent effect of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin on fluorescein-labeled KRAS RNA bound to the three forms of recombinant IMP1. We determined that, for grifolin and neogrifolin, up to 100 μM had no effect on IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction (Fig 9). In contrast, confluentin clearly inhibited the interaction between KRAS RNA and the full-length IMP1, starting at 40 μM. It also significantly inhibited the interaction between KRAS RNA and KH1to4 IMP1 at concentrations above 40 μM (Fig 9). Surprisingly, confluentin had no effect on the KRAS RNA-IMP1 KH3&4 interaction (Fig 9), suggesting that confluentin binds to site(s) on IMP1 that are outside of the KH3&4 di-domain. Given that the only difference between KH1to4 IMP1 and KH3&4 IMP1 is the presence of KH1 and KH2 domains in the former, it is highly likely that confluentin binds to the KH1&2 di-domain to exert its inhibitory effect on IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction. The KH1 and KH2 di-domain has been shown to be critical for IMP1 to bind RNA substrates [23,25,41,42], including the KRAS RNA [24,25]. In addition, a recent study suggested that the KH1&KH2 di-domain of IMP1 has high RNA-binding affinity and binds RNA rapidly [43]. Further study is clearly required to test the hypothesis that confluentin binds to KH1 and KH2 di-domain to inhibit the function of IMP1.

Download:

Fig 8. Binding curves of the full-length and truncated IMP1 to KRAS RNA as determined using fluorescence polarization.

Increasing amounts of the full-length IMP1 or truncated IMP1 (KH1to4 and KH3&4) were incubated with 44-nt fluorescein-labeled KRAS RNA at 37°C for 30 min. Results shown represent three replicate experiments (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g008

Download:

Fig 9. Effect of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin on the physical interaction between KRAS RNA and IMP1 protein.

Recombinant IMP1 protein (300 nM) was incubated with fluorescently-labeled KRAS RNA in the absence or presence of various concentrations of grifolin, neogrifolin or confluentin. The concentrations of compounds used were: 100, 80, 40, 20, 10 and 5 μM. The three types of recombinant IMP1 proteins used were: full-length, KH1to4 and KH3&4. Data shown are mean ± S.D. pooled from three independent experiments (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g009

When incubated with the 44-nt fluorescein-labeled KRAS RNA alone, grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin had no effect on fluorescence anisotropy units (Fig 10), indicating that these compounds have no affinity for KRAS RNA. However, the antibiotic neomycin, known to bind RNA [44,45], significantly enhanced fluorescence anisotropy units when incubated with the fluorescently-labeled KRAS RNA (Fig 10). This result supports the theory that confluentin inhibits IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction by targeting IMP1 protein. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a small molecule inhibiting IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction. A small molecule called BTYNB has been reported to inhibit IMP1-c-myc RNA interaction [46]. The present study raises the possibility that confluentin suppresses KRAS expression by disrupting IMP1-KRAS mRNA in colon cancer cells. As such, it would be important to determine whether confluentin can inhibit other IMP1-RNA interactions, leading to the potential functional inhibition of IMP1 in cell lines and in animal models.

Download:

Fig 10. Grifolin (1), neogrifolin (2) and confluentin (3) do not bind to KRAS RNA.

Increasing concentrations of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin were incubated with the 44-nt fluorescein-labeled KRAS RNA at 37°C for 30 min. Fluorescence anisotropy units were then measured. Neomycin was used as the positive control. The results shown represent three replicate experiments (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.g010

It is important to point out the limitation of the fluorescence polarization method used here: only a small fragment of KRAS mRNA (44-nt) that directly interacted with IMP1 was studied. In a two-dimensional cell culture and three-dimensional animal model, such interaction involving the entire KRAS mRNA (about 5,400-nt) is more complex and most likely involves many other ribonucleoproteins. Nevertheless, our findings that confluentin specifically inhibits KRAS RNA-IMP1 interaction and KRAS expression in human colon cancer cells are worthy of further investigations. For instance, it would be of interest to determine whether confluentin is able to inhibit IMP1 granule formation in zebrafish embryos [23], an early event in RNA-IMP1 interaction in vivo. It is also important to determine the mechanism whereby the three compounds inhibit KRAS expression in human colon cancer cells, and whether they have an effect on KRAS expression in pancreatic and lung cancer cells as well as cholangiocarcinoma cells where KRAS is highly implicated.

Conclusions

The results from this study show that the three major anti-cell viability compounds from the ethanol extract of the mushroom A. flettii, collected in north-central BC, are grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin. We also demonstrate for the first time that confluentin induces apoptosis and arrests the cell cycle at the G2/M phase in colon cancer cells. Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin suppress KRAS expression in colon cancer cells, a novel bioactivity for these compounds. In this study, we described an in vitro fluorescence polarization method to conveniently study KRAS RNA-IMP1 interaction. Using this method, we found that confluentin specifically inhibit the physical interaction between IMP1 and KRAS RNA. As such, it remains important to consider further the exploration of confluentin as a potential inhibitor of the oncogenic function of IMP1 in animal cells.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. HPLC UV spectrum showing the relative abundance and retention times of the three major peaks at λ_max 279 nm.

An analytical column Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XBD-C18 (4.6 mm x 150 mm) was used.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. HPLC-chromatogram (monitored at 279 nm), and MS-spectra of grifolin.

The ESIMS spectrum exhibited a [M + H]⁺ peak at m/z = 329.3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. ¹H-NMR spectrum of grifolin (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. ¹³C-NMR spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. COSY spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. HSQC spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. HPLC-chromatogram (monitored at 279 nm), and MS-spectra of neogrifolin.

The ESIMS spectrum exhibited a [M + H]⁺ peak at m/z = 329.3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. ¹H-NMR spectrum of neogrifolin (2) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s008

(TIF)

S9 Fig. ¹³C-NMR spectrum of neogrifolin (2) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s009

(TIF)

S10 Fig. COSY spectrum of neogrifolin (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s010

(TIF)

S11 Fig. HSQC spectrum of neogrifolin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s011

(TIF)

S12 Fig. HPLC-chromatogram (monitored at 279 nm), and MS-spectra of confluentin.

The ESIMS spectrum exhibited a [M + H]⁺ peak at m/z = 327.2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s012

(TIF)

S13 Fig. ¹H-NMR spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s013

(TIF)

S14 Fig. ¹³C-NMR spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s014

(TIF)

S15 Fig. COSY spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s015

(TIF)

S16 Fig. HSQC spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s016

(TIF)

S17 Fig. HSQC spectrum of confluentin (expanded: 4.8–7.0 ppm) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s017

(TIF)

S18 Fig. HSQC spectrum of confluentin (expanded: 0–3.0 ppm) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s018

(TIF)

S19 Fig. Effect of grifolin, neogrifolin, and confluentin on KRAS expression in HT29 human colon cancer cells.

HT29 cells were treated with 20 μM (A) or 50 μM (A and B) of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin for 48 hours. Isolated cell lysates were then subjected to Western blot analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s019

(TIF)

S20 Fig. Mapping the IMP1 binding site on KRAS RNA using electrophoretic mobility shift assay.

(A) A summary of 3’ and 5’ end truncated KRAS RNA fragments corresponding to nts 1–185, and their relative binding affinity for IMP1. (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay of 3’ and 5’ end truncated KRAS RNA fragments corresponding to nts 1–185. (C) A summary of 3’ and 5’ end truncated KRAS RNA fragments corresponding to nts 93–185, and their relative binding affinity for IMP1. (D) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay of 3’ and 5’ end truncated KRAS RNA fragments corresponding to nts 93–185.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s020

(TIF)

S1 Table. ¹³C-NMR spectral data of purified grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin compared to published data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s021

(DOCX)

S2 Table. ¹H-NMR spectral data of purified grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin compared to published data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s022

(DOCX)

S1 Raw Images.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231948.s023

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Northern Analytical Laboratory Services for allowing us to use their Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC System. We thank Mr. Noburo Kato for helping with parts of the Western blot experiments.

References

1. Smith A, Javed S, Barad A, Myhre V, Li WM, Reimer K, et al. Growth-inhibitory and immunomodulatory activities of wild mushrooms from north-central British Columbia (Canada). Int J Med Mushrooms. 2017;19: 485–497. pmid:29199559
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Deo G, Khatra J, Buttar S, Li WM, Tackaberry LE, Massicotte H.B, et al. Anti-proliferative, immuno-stimulatory and anti-inflammatory activities of extracts derived from mushrooms collected in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2019;21: 629–643. pmid:31679298
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Ginns J. The taxonomy and distribution of rare or uncommon species of Albatrellus in western North America. Can J Bot. 1997;75: 261–273.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Nukata M, Hashimoto T, Yamamoto I, Iwasaki N, Tanaka M, Asakawa Y. Neogrifolin derivatives possessing anti-oxidative activity from the mushroom Albatrellus ovinus. Phytochem. 2002;59: 731–737.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Liu L-Y, Li Z-H, Ding Z-H, Dong Z-J, Li G-T, Li Y, et al. Meroterpenoid pigments from the basidiomycete Albatrellus ovinus. J Nat Prod. 2013;76: 79–84. pmid:23305465
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Liu L-Y, Li Z-H, Wang G-Q, Wei K, Dong Z-J, Feng T, et al. Nine new farnesylphenols from the basidiomycete Albatrellus caeruleoporus. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2014;4: 119–128. pmid:24858140
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Hellwig V, Nopper R, Mauler F, Freitag J, Liu J-K, Ding Z-H, et al. Activities of prenylphenol derivatives from fruitbodies of Albatrellus spp. on the human and rat vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1) and characterization of the novel natural product. Arch Pharm Pharm Med Chem. 2003;2: 119–126.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Quang DN, Hashimoto T, Arakawa Y, Kohchi C, Nishizawa T, Soma G-I, et al. Grifolin derivatives from Albatrellus caeruleoporus, new inhibitors of nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14: 164–168. pmid:16169234
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kawagishi H, Tanaka A, Sugiyama K, Mori H, Sakamoto H, Ishiguro Y, et al. A pyradine-derivative from the mushroom Albratrellus confluens. Phytochem. 1996;42: 547–548.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Koch B, Steglich W. Meroterpenoid pigments from Albatrellus flettii (Basidiomycetes). Eur J Org Chem. 2007;2007: 1631–1635.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Liu X-T, Winkler AL, Schwan WR, Volk TJ, Rott MA, Monte A. Antibacterial compounds from mushrooms I: a lanostane-type triterpene and prenylphenol derivatives from Jahnoporus hirtus and Albatrellus flettii and their activities against Bacillus cereus and Enterococcus faecalis. Planta Med. 2010;76: 182–183. pmid:19644795
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Downward J. Targeting RAS signaling pathways in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;3: 11–22.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Ostrem JM, Shokat KM. Direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS: from structural insights to mechanism-based design. Nat Rev Drug Disc. 2016;15: 771–785.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. McCormick F. KRAS as a therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21: 1797–1801. pmid:25878360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Hocker HJ, Cho K-J, Chen CYK, Rambahal N, Sagineedu SR, Shaari K, et al. Andrographolide derivatives inhibit guanine nucleotide exchange and abrogate oncogenic Ras function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: 10201–10206. pmid:23737504
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Ostrem JM, Peters U, Sos ML, Wells JA, Shokat KM. K-Ras (G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 2013;503: 548–551. pmid:24256730
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Zeng M, Lu J, Li L, Feru F, Quan C, Ficarro SB, et al. Potent and selective covalent quinazoline inhibitors of KRAS G12C. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24: 1005–1016. pmid:28781124
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Yuan TL, Fellmann C, Lee CS, Ritchie CD, Thapar V, Lee LC, et al. Development of siRNA payloads to target KRAS-mutant cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4: 1182–1197. pmid:25100204
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Xue W, Dahlman JE, Tammela T, Khan OF, Sood S, Dave A, et al. Small RNA combination therapy for lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111: E3553–3561. pmid:25114235
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Zorde Khvalevsky E, Gabai R, Rachmut IH, Horwitz E, Brunschwig Z, Orbach A, et al. Mutant KRAS is a druggable target for pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: 20723–20728. pmid:24297898
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Ross SJ, Revenko AS, Hanson LL, Ellston R, Staniszewska A, Whalley N, et al. Targeting KRAS-dependent tumors with AZD4785, a high affinity therapeutic antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of KRAS. Sci Trans Med. 2017;9: eaal5253.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Barad A, Mackedenski S, Li WM, Li XJ, Lim BCC, Rashid F, et al. Anti-proliferative activity of a purified polysaccharide isolated from the basidiomycete fungus Paxillus involutus. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181: 923–930. pmid:29254055
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Barnes M, Rensburg GV, Li WM, Mehmood K, Mackedenski S, Chan C-M, et al. Molecular insights into the coding region determinant-binding protein-RNA interaction through site-directed mutagenesis in the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein-K-homology domains. J Biol Chem. 2015;290: 625–639. pmid:25389298
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Mackedenski S, Wang C, Li WM, Lee CH. Characterizing the interaction between insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1) and KRAS expression. Biochem J. 2018;475: 2749–2767. pmid:30104206
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Rensburg GV, Mackedenski S, Lee CH. Characterizing the coding region determinant-binding protein (CRD-BP)-microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) mRNA interaction. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0171196. pmid:28182633
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Mehmood K, Akhtar D, Mackedenski S, Wang C, Lee CH. Inhibition of GLI1 expression by targeting the CRD-BP-GLI1 mRNA interaction using specific oligonucleotide. Mol Pharmacol. 2016;89: 606–617.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Ye M, Liu J-K, Lu Z-X, Zhao Y, Liu S-F, Li L-L, et al. Grifolin, a potential antitumor natural product from the mushroom Albatrellus confluens, inhibits tumor cell growth by inducing apoptosis in vitro. FEBS Letts. 2005;579: 3437–3443.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Chen Y, Peng G-F, Han X-Z, Wang W, Zhang G-Q, Li X. Apoptosis prediction via inhibition of AKT signaling pathway by neogrifolin. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8: 1154–1164. pmid:25973001
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Yan H, Che X, Lv Q, Zhang L, Dongol S, Wang Y, et al. Grifolin induces apoptosis and promotes cell cycle arrest in the A2780 human ovarian cancer cell line via inactivation of the ERK1/2 and Akt pathways. Oncol Letts. 2017;13: 4806–4812.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Che X, Yan H, Sun H, Dongol S, Wang Y, Lv Q, et al. Grifolin induces autophagic cell death by inhibiting the Akt/mTOR/S6K pathway in human ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;36: 1041–1047. pmid:27277722
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Luo X-J, Li L-L, Deng Q-P, Yu X-F, Yang L-F, Luo F-J, et al. Grifolin, a potent antitumor natural product upregulates death-associated protein kinase 1 DAPK1 via p53 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47: 316–325. pmid:20943371
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Ye M, Luo X, Li L, Shi Y, Tan M, Weng X, et al. Grifolin, a potential antitumor natural product from the mushroom Albatrellus confluens, induces cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase via the ERK1/2 pathway. Cancer Letts. 2007;258: 199–207.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Yang S, Wang X, Zhong G. Grifolin, a potent antitumor natural product inhibits the growth and invasion of gastric cancer cells in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9: 12659–12668.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Wu Z, Li Y. Grifolin exhibits anti-cancer activity by inhibiting the development and invasion of gastric tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 21454–21460. pmid:28206955
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Bates SE. Targeting RAS: the elusive prize. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21: 1796. pmid:25878359
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Bryant KL, Mancias JD, Kimmelman AC, Der CJ. KRAS: feeding pancreatic cancer proliferation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;39: 91–100.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Leung ELH, Luo LX, Liu ZQ, Wong VKW, Lu LL, Xie Y, et al. Inhibition of KRAS-dependent lung cancer cell growth by deltarasin: blockage of autophagy increases its cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9: 216–231. pmid:29440631
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Mongroo PS, Noubissi FK, Cuatrecasas M, Kalabis J, King CE, Johnstone CN, et al. IMP-1 displays cross-talk with K-Ras and modulates colon cancer cell survival through the novel proapoptotic protein CYFIP2. Cancer Res. 2011;71: 2172–2182. pmid:21252116
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Hall MD, Yasgar A, Peryea T, Braisted JC, Jadhav A, Simeonov A, et al. Fluorescence polarization assays in high-throughput screening and drug discovery: a review. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2016;4: 022001. pmid:28809163
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. King DT, Barnes M, Thomsen D, Lee CH. Assessing specific oligonucleotides and small molecule antibiotics for the ability to inhibit the CRD-BP-CD44 RNA interaction. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e91585. pmid:24622399
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Bell JL, Wachter K, Muhleck B, Pazaitis N, Kohn N, Lederer M, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70: 2657–2675. pmid:23069990
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Nielsen J, Kristensen MA, Willemoes M, Nielsen FC, Christiansen J. Sequential dimerization of human zipcode-binding protein IMP1 on RNA: a cooperative mechanism providing RNP stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 4368–4376. pmid:15314207
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Dagil R, Ball NJ, Ogrodowicz RW, Hobor F, Purkiss AG, Kelly G, et al. IMP1 KH1 and KH2 domains create a structural platform with unique RNA recognition and re-modelling properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: 4334–4348. pmid:30864660
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Tor Y. Targeting RNA with small molecules. Chembiochem. 2003;4: 998–1007. pmid:14523917
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Xi H, Gray D, Kumar S, Arva DP. Molecular recognition of single-stranded RNA: neomycin binding to poly(A). FEBS Letts. 2009;583: 2269–2275.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Mahapatra L, Andruska N, Mao C, Le J, Shapiro DJ. A novel IMP1 inhibitor, BTYNB, targets c-Myc and inhibits melanoma and ovarian cancer cell proliferation. Trans Oncol. 2017;10: 818–827.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Smith A, Javed S, Barad A, Myhre V, Li WM, Reimer K, et al. Growth-inhibitory and immunomodulatory activities of wild mushrooms from north-central British Columbia (Canada). Int J Med Mushrooms. 2017;19: 485–497. pmid:29199559
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Deo G, Khatra J, Buttar S, Li WM, Tackaberry LE, Massicotte H.B, et al. Anti-proliferative, immuno-stimulatory and anti-inflammatory activities of extracts derived from mushrooms collected in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2019;21: 629–643. pmid:31679298
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Ginns J. The taxonomy and distribution of rare or uncommon species of Albatrellus in western North America. Can J Bot. 1997;75: 261–273.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Nukata M, Hashimoto T, Yamamoto I, Iwasaki N, Tanaka M, Asakawa Y. Neogrifolin derivatives possessing anti-oxidative activity from the mushroom Albatrellus ovinus. Phytochem. 2002;59: 731–737.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Liu L-Y, Li Z-H, Ding Z-H, Dong Z-J, Li G-T, Li Y, et al. Meroterpenoid pigments from the basidiomycete Albatrellus ovinus. J Nat Prod. 2013;76: 79–84. pmid:23305465
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] PubMed/NCBI

[18] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Liu L-Y, Li Z-H, Wang G-Q, Wei K, Dong Z-J, Feng T, et al. Nine new farnesylphenols from the basidiomycete Albatrellus caeruleoporus. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2014;4: 119–128. pmid:24858140
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] PubMed/NCBI

[22] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Hellwig V, Nopper R, Mauler F, Freitag J, Liu J-K, Ding Z-H, et al. Activities of prenylphenol derivatives from fruitbodies of Albatrellus spp. on the human and rat vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1) and characterization of the novel natural product. Arch Pharm Pharm Med Chem. 2003;2: 119–126.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Quang DN, Hashimoto T, Arakawa Y, Kohchi C, Nishizawa T, Soma G-I, et al. Grifolin derivatives from Albatrellus caeruleoporus, new inhibitors of nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2006;14: 164–168. pmid:16169234
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kawagishi H, Tanaka A, Sugiyama K, Mori H, Sakamoto H, Ishiguro Y, et al. A pyradine-derivative from the mushroom Albratrellus confluens. Phytochem. 1996;42: 547–548.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Koch B, Steglich W. Meroterpenoid pigments from Albatrellus flettii (Basidiomycetes). Eur J Org Chem. 2007;2007: 1631–1635.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Liu X-T, Winkler AL, Schwan WR, Volk TJ, Rott MA, Monte A. Antibacterial compounds from mushrooms I: a lanostane-type triterpene and prenylphenol derivatives from Jahnoporus hirtus and Albatrellus flettii and their activities against Bacillus cereus and Enterococcus faecalis. Planta Med. 2010;76: 182–183. pmid:19644795
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Downward J. Targeting RAS signaling pathways in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;3: 11–22.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Ostrem JM, Shokat KM. Direct small-molecule inhibitors of KRAS: from structural insights to mechanism-based design. Nat Rev Drug Disc. 2016;15: 771–785.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. McCormick F. KRAS as a therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21: 1797–1801. pmid:25878360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hocker HJ, Cho K-J, Chen CYK, Rambahal N, Sagineedu SR, Shaari K, et al. Andrographolide derivatives inhibit guanine nucleotide exchange and abrogate oncogenic Ras function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: 10201–10206. pmid:23737504
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Ostrem JM, Peters U, Sos ML, Wells JA, Shokat KM. K-Ras (G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 2013;503: 548–551. pmid:24256730
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Zeng M, Lu J, Li L, Feru F, Quan C, Ficarro SB, et al. Potent and selective covalent quinazoline inhibitors of KRAS G12C. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24: 1005–1016. pmid:28781124
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Yuan TL, Fellmann C, Lee CS, Ritchie CD, Thapar V, Lee LC, et al. Development of siRNA payloads to target KRAS-mutant cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4: 1182–1197. pmid:25100204
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Xue W, Dahlman JE, Tammela T, Khan OF, Sood S, Dave A, et al. Small RNA combination therapy for lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111: E3553–3561. pmid:25114235
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Zorde Khvalevsky E, Gabai R, Rachmut IH, Horwitz E, Brunschwig Z, Orbach A, et al. Mutant KRAS is a druggable target for pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: 20723–20728. pmid:24297898
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Ross SJ, Revenko AS, Hanson LL, Ellston R, Staniszewska A, Whalley N, et al. Targeting KRAS-dependent tumors with AZD4785, a high affinity therapeutic antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of KRAS. Sci Trans Med. 2017;9: eaal5253.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Barad A, Mackedenski S, Li WM, Li XJ, Lim BCC, Rashid F, et al. Anti-proliferative activity of a purified polysaccharide isolated from the basidiomycete fungus Paxillus involutus. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181: 923–930. pmid:29254055
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Barnes M, Rensburg GV, Li WM, Mehmood K, Mackedenski S, Chan C-M, et al. Molecular insights into the coding region determinant-binding protein-RNA interaction through site-directed mutagenesis in the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein-K-homology domains. J Biol Chem. 2015;290: 625–639. pmid:25389298
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Mackedenski S, Wang C, Li WM, Lee CH. Characterizing the interaction between insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IMP1) and KRAS expression. Biochem J. 2018;475: 2749–2767. pmid:30104206
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Rensburg GV, Mackedenski S, Lee CH. Characterizing the coding region determinant-binding protein (CRD-BP)-microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) mRNA interaction. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0171196. pmid:28182633
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Mehmood K, Akhtar D, Mackedenski S, Wang C, Lee CH. Inhibition of GLI1 expression by targeting the CRD-BP-GLI1 mRNA interaction using specific oligonucleotide. Mol Pharmacol. 2016;89: 606–617.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ye M, Liu J-K, Lu Z-X, Zhao Y, Liu S-F, Li L-L, et al. Grifolin, a potential antitumor natural product from the mushroom Albatrellus confluens, inhibits tumor cell growth by inducing apoptosis in vitro. FEBS Letts. 2005;579: 3437–3443.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Chen Y, Peng G-F, Han X-Z, Wang W, Zhang G-Q, Li X. Apoptosis prediction via inhibition of AKT signaling pathway by neogrifolin. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8: 1154–1164. pmid:25973001
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Yan H, Che X, Lv Q, Zhang L, Dongol S, Wang Y, et al. Grifolin induces apoptosis and promotes cell cycle arrest in the A2780 human ovarian cancer cell line via inactivation of the ERK1/2 and Akt pathways. Oncol Letts. 2017;13: 4806–4812.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Che X, Yan H, Sun H, Dongol S, Wang Y, Lv Q, et al. Grifolin induces autophagic cell death by inhibiting the Akt/mTOR/S6K pathway in human ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;36: 1041–1047. pmid:27277722
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Luo X-J, Li L-L, Deng Q-P, Yu X-F, Yang L-F, Luo F-J, et al. Grifolin, a potent antitumor natural product upregulates death-associated protein kinase 1 DAPK1 via p53 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47: 316–325. pmid:20943371
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Ye M, Luo X, Li L, Shi Y, Tan M, Weng X, et al. Grifolin, a potential antitumor natural product from the mushroom Albatrellus confluens, induces cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase via the ERK1/2 pathway. Cancer Letts. 2007;258: 199–207.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Yang S, Wang X, Zhong G. Grifolin, a potent antitumor natural product inhibits the growth and invasion of gastric cancer cells in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9: 12659–12668.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Wu Z, Li Y. Grifolin exhibits anti-cancer activity by inhibiting the development and invasion of gastric tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 21454–21460. pmid:28206955
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Bates SE. Targeting RAS: the elusive prize. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21: 1796. pmid:25878359
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Bryant KL, Mancias JD, Kimmelman AC, Der CJ. KRAS: feeding pancreatic cancer proliferation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;39: 91–100.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Leung ELH, Luo LX, Liu ZQ, Wong VKW, Lu LL, Xie Y, et al. Inhibition of KRAS-dependent lung cancer cell growth by deltarasin: blockage of autophagy increases its cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9: 216–231. pmid:29440631
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Mongroo PS, Noubissi FK, Cuatrecasas M, Kalabis J, King CE, Johnstone CN, et al. IMP-1 displays cross-talk with K-Ras and modulates colon cancer cell survival through the novel proapoptotic protein CYFIP2. Cancer Res. 2011;71: 2172–2182. pmid:21252116
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Hall MD, Yasgar A, Peryea T, Braisted JC, Jadhav A, Simeonov A, et al. Fluorescence polarization assays in high-throughput screening and drug discovery: a review. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2016;4: 022001. pmid:28809163
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. King DT, Barnes M, Thomsen D, Lee CH. Assessing specific oligonucleotides and small molecule antibiotics for the ability to inhibit the CRD-BP-CD44 RNA interaction. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e91585. pmid:24622399
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Bell JL, Wachter K, Muhleck B, Pazaitis N, Kohn N, Lederer M, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70: 2657–2675. pmid:23069990
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Nielsen J, Kristensen MA, Willemoes M, Nielsen FC, Christiansen J. Sequential dimerization of human zipcode-binding protein IMP1 on RNA: a cooperative mechanism providing RNP stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 4368–4376. pmid:15314207
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Dagil R, Ball NJ, Ogrodowicz RW, Hobor F, Purkiss AG, Kelly G, et al. IMP1 KH1 and KH2 domains create a structural platform with unique RNA recognition and re-modelling properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: 4334–4348. pmid:30864660
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Tor Y. Targeting RNA with small molecules. Chembiochem. 2003;4: 998–1007. pmid:14523917
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Xi H, Gray D, Kumar S, Arva DP. Molecular recognition of single-stranded RNA: neomycin binding to poly(A). FEBS Letts. 2009;583: 2269–2275.
View Article
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Mahapatra L, Andruska N, Mao C, Le J, Shapiro DJ. A novel IMP1 inhibitor, BTYNB, targets c-Myc and inhibits melanoma and ovarian cancer cell proliferation. Trans Oncol. 2017;10: 818–827.
View Article
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

General experimental procedures

Fungal collection and identification

Extraction and isolation

Cytotoxicity assay

Western blot analysis

Fluorescence polarization analysis

Flow cytometry apoptosis and cell cycle analyses

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

Statistical analysis

Results and discussion

Isolation and identification of grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin

Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin are cytotoxic to human colon cancer cells

Confluentin induces apoptosis and arrests cell cycle in human colon cancer cells

Grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin suppress KRAS expression

Establishing a fluorescence polarization method to study IMP1-RNA interactions

Confluentin inhibits IMP1-KRAS RNA interaction

Conclusions

Supporting information

S1 Fig. HPLC UV spectrum showing the relative abundance and retention times of the three major peaks at λmax 279 nm.

S2 Fig. HPLC-chromatogram (monitored at 279 nm), and MS-spectra of grifolin.

S3 Fig. 1H-NMR spectrum of grifolin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S4 Fig. 13C-NMR spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S5 Fig. COSY spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S6 Fig. HSQC spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S7 Fig. HPLC-chromatogram (monitored at 279 nm), and MS-spectra of neogrifolin.

S8 Fig. 1H-NMR spectrum of neogrifolin (2) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S9 Fig. 13C-NMR spectrum of neogrifolin (2) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S10 Fig. COSY spectrum of neogrifolin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S11 Fig. HSQC spectrum of neogrifolin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S12 Fig. HPLC-chromatogram (monitored at 279 nm), and MS-spectra of confluentin.

S13 Fig. 1H-NMR spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S14 Fig. 13C-NMR spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S15 Fig. COSY spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S16 Fig. HSQC spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S17 Fig. HSQC spectrum of confluentin (expanded: 4.8–7.0 ppm) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S18 Fig. HSQC spectrum of confluentin (expanded: 0–3.0 ppm) (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S19 Fig. Effect of grifolin, neogrifolin, and confluentin on KRAS expression in HT29 human colon cancer cells.

S20 Fig. Mapping the IMP1 binding site on KRAS RNA using electrophoretic mobility shift assay.

S1 Table. 13C-NMR spectral data of purified grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin compared to published data.

S2 Table. 1H-NMR spectral data of purified grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin compared to published data.

S1 Raw Images.

Acknowledgments

References

S1 Fig. HPLC UV spectrum showing the relative abundance and retention times of the three major peaks at λ_max 279 nm.

S3 Fig. ¹H-NMR spectrum of grifolin (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S4 Fig. ¹³C-NMR spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S5 Fig. COSY spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S6 Fig. HSQC spectrum of grifolin (1) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S8 Fig. ¹H-NMR spectrum of neogrifolin (2) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S9 Fig. ¹³C-NMR spectrum of neogrifolin (2) (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S10 Fig. COSY spectrum of neogrifolin (CDCl₃ with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S13 Fig. ¹H-NMR spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S14 Fig. ¹³C-NMR spectrum of confluentin (CDCl3 with 0.3% TMS, 300 MHz).

S1 Table. ¹³C-NMR spectral data of purified grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin compared to published data.

S2 Table. ¹H-NMR spectral data of purified grifolin, neogrifolin and confluentin compared to published data.