Figures
Abstract
Dysfunctions in the GABAergic system lead to various pathological conditions and impaired inhibitory function is one of the causes behind neuropathies characterized by neuronal hyper excitability. The Dlx homeobox genes are involved in the development of nervous system, neural crest, branchial arches and developing appendages. Dlx genes also take part in neuronal migration and differentiation during development, more precisely, in the migration and differentiation of GABAergic neurons. Functional analysis of dlx genes has mainly been carried out in developing zebrafish embryos and larvae, however information regarding the expression and roles of these genes in the adult zebrafish brain is still lacking. The extensive neurogenesis that takes place in the adult zebrafish brain, makes them a good model for the visualization of mechanisms involving dlx genes during adulthood in physiological conditions and during regeneration of the nervous system. We have identified the adult brain regions where transcripts of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a genes are normally found and have confirmed that within telencephalic domains, there is high overlapping expression of the four dlx paralogs with a marker for GABAergic neurons. Co-localization analyses carried with the Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/dlx6a:GFP) reporter line have also shown that in some areas of the diencephalon, cells expressing the dlx5a/6a bigene may have a neural stem cell identity. Furthermore, investigations in a response to stab wound lesions, have demonstrated a possible participation of the dlx5a/6a bigene, most likely of dlx5a, during regeneration of the adult zebrafish brain. These observations suggest a possible participation of dlx-expressing cells during brain regeneration in adult zebrafish and also provide information on the role of dlx genes under normal physiological conditions in adults.
Citation: Weinschutz Mendes H, Taktek M, Duret T, Ekker M (2020) Expression of dlx genes in the normal and regenerating brain of adult zebrafish. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0229549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229549
Editor: Carla Lucini, Università di Napoli Federico II, ITALY
Received: February 7, 2020; Accepted: May 16, 2020; Published: June 4, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Weinschutz Mendes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant # 121795) and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant # MOP-137082). We, the authors, declare no competing interests.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The transcription factors encoded by Dlx genes play key roles in the patterning of the vertebrate limb and the central nervous system (CNS) [1], more specifically, Dlx genes are required in the development of the mammalian brain [2]. These genes are required for correct migration and differentiation of progenitors that will later give rise to GABAergic interneurons [1,3]. Dlx1-/-/Dlx2-/- mutant mice show a loss of GABAergic interneuron differentiation in the ventral telencephalon, supporting the notion of this requirement for Dlx genes in the differentiation to GABAergic interneurons [4]. In the case of zebrafish, dlx genes are also expressed in the developing brain [5,6]. At 24–48 hours-post-fertilization (hpf), there is partial overlapping expression of dlx and gad1 genes in the zebrafish forebrain [7]. Nevertheless, information regarding the activity and functions of Dlx genes in the adult brain is still scarce and non-existent in the zebrafish.
The majority of vertebrates have six Dlx genes which are organized in convergently transcribed bigene pairs, namely Dlx1/Dlx2, Dlx3/Dlx4 and Dlx5/Dlx6 [8–10]. In zebrafish, the dlx1a/dlx2a and dlx5a/dlx6a (orthologs of mouse Dlx1/Dlx2 and Dlx5/Dlx6) are expressed in the developing brain. Previously described cis-regulatory regions are essential for driving the expression of these bigenes in the brain. The deletion of one of these regions in mice, I56ii, has been shown to impair the expression of Dlx genes and of potential targets including Gad2 and other striatal markers [11]. The identification of such regulatory elements was a starting point for the generation of the Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/dlx6a:GFP) reporter line that mimics the endogenous expression patterns of dlx5a/dlx6a genes in the forebrain [10,12].
Using the Cre/LoxP system for lineage tracing, Solek and collaborators have reported a detailed analysis of fate decisions for dlx1a/2a- and dlx5a/6a-expressing cells. In some instances, labeling larval dlx5a/6a-expressing cells, but not dlx1a/2a-expressing cells, have resulted in massively expanding, widespread clonal expansion throughout the adult brain [13]. These analyses provided some indications concerning the role of the progeny of dlx-expressing cells in the adult zebrafish brain, but further analyses are necessary for investigating these dlx-expressing cells in the adult brain.
Different investigations have implicated the dlx genes in a group of complex genetic regulatory networks responsible for proper establishment of neuronal diversity in the CNS during development. Interestingly, the establishment of new neurons also takes place in the adult zebrafish brain where multiple areas present constitutive proliferation [14,15]. In several mammals and bird species, constitutive active neurogenic domains are restricted to the forebrain, whereas in the zebrafish, new neurons are generated in most brain regions throughout adult life (reviewed [16,17]). High rates of adult neurogenesis are present in thirteen to sixteen distinct neural stem cell niches along the adult zebrafish brain. The adult zebrafish brain possesses regeneration capability, which makes this animal an ideal model to study the mechanisms involved in brain regeneration and the different genes participating in regeneration responses within the CNS [18] (reviewed in [19,20]). Therefore, a remarkable capacity to regenerate the CNS following mechanical or chemical insult is present in the zebrafish [16].
The important roles of dlx genes during the development and specification of GABAergic neurons and the potential for regenerative investigations of adult zebrafish led us to carry investigations on dlx paralogs in the adult zebrafish brain. In this work, we report expression of all four dlx paralogs in the adult zebrafish brain and show that the majority of cells expressing these genes are in fact GABAergic neurons. Using the previously described transgenic line Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/dlx6a:GFP) we carried co-localization analyses which revealed that dlx5a/6a-expressing cells present a neural stem cell identity in specific areas of the forebrain and midbrain of adult zebrafish. Furthermore, during a regeneration response following stab injury, we observed a down-regulation followed by up-regulation of the dlx5a paralog in different time points and up-regulation of the dlx5a/6a bigene.
Materials and methods
Animal care, husbandry and strains
All experiments were conducted using protocols approved by the University of Ottawa Animal Care Committee. Adult zebrafish were housed in circulating water at 28.5C and 14-h light cycle, following standard procedures previously described (Westerfield, 2000). Zebrafish embryos were obtained from the natural spawning of adult zebrafish. Facility-raised wild type and adult zebrafish of a reporter line, Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/dlx6a:GFP), were used. In this reporter line, the green fluorescent protein (GFP) is expressed under the control of cis-regulatory elements of the dlx5a/6a bigene, namely the I56i and I56ii intergenic region and a 3.5kb fragment of the dlx6a 5’-flanking region [8,10]. In this line the GFP reporter recapitulates the expression of dlx5a and/or dlx6a [8,21,22].
Brain lesions and collection of zebrafish brain tissue
Surgeries were performed on adult zebrafish raging from 3mpf to 1ypf as described by Schmidt (2014) [23]. Briefly, after being anesthetized with a 0.4% Tricaine solution, fish are injured by the insertion of sterile 30g needle directly and vertically trough the skull into the medial region of one telencephalic hemisphere under a dissecting microscope [23]. Control specimens are anesthetized, but no injury is provoked. After surgery, adult zebrafish were maintained under the same conditions as the rest of the colony. Lesion and control specimens were euthanized at 3 and 7 days post-lesion (dpl) for analyses.
Fish were euthanized by immersion in Tricaine MS-222 solution at 0.8% in system water, the upper skull was removed and the whole head was fixed in 4% PFA/PBS overnight at 4 °C. After whole brain was dissected, they were post fixed for additional 30 min. The tissue was then washed several times with PBS and equilibrated with 30% sucrose/PBS overnight at 4 °C. Whole brains were then incubated in a solution of 1:2 30% Sucrose:OCT Compound (Tissue-Tek, VWR Canada) for 30 min, placed in cryomolds and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cryosections of 14–16 μm were obtained with a CM3050S cryostat (Leica, Concord, ON) in duplicate, triplicate or quadruplicate slides.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and double IHC
Sections were first rehydrated in PBST (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20), and blocked in 10% fetal bovine serum in PBST for at least 2 hours at room temperature. The primary antibodies were used at different dilutions according to the manufacturer’s instructions and optimization of the protocol (Table 1). The primary antibody incubation was carried out overnight at 4°C in 1% fetal bovine serum in PBST. Sections were then washed 3 times /15 min with PBST and incubated with the secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature (Table 1). Sections were again washed with PBST and nuclei visualized with DAPI (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON). The Calbindin, Calretinin, PCNA and TH antibodies required an extra step of antigen retrieval. Sections were treated for 20 min at 85 °C in 0.01 M sodium citrate/0.05% Tween-20 solution and cooled down to RT for 15 minutes prior to blocking. Images were acquired with either a Nikon A1 Confocal microscope or a Zeiss AxioPhot Fluorescence Microscope and treated with NIS-Elements Advanced Research Software or ImageJ.
Riboprobes and In-situ hybridization (ISH)
Expression of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a, dlx6a and gad65 was determined using In situ hybridization assays with antisense mRNA probes on crysections as described (Dorsky et al., 1995). Antisense mRNA probes were labeled with digoxygenin-dNTP or dinitrophenol DNP-11-UTP and synthesized from cDNA clones, dlx1a [6], dlx2a and dlx5a [5], dlx6a [24] and gad65 [25]. Vectors containing the cDNA clones were linearized with BamHI, EcoRI or Xhol and the antisense riboprobes were synthesized using either the T7 or T3 polymerase as required.
Brain sections, stored at -20°C, were thawed at room temperature for 30 minutes before the experiment. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 70°C in a humidified chamber. Slides were washed twice with Solution A (50% Formamide, 5% 20x SSC in dH20) and twice with TBS. Blocking with 10% FBS TBST was carried for 2 hours in RT. Detection of hybridized probes was performed with anti-DIG antibodies AP fragments (Roche, Basel Switzerland; dilution 1:1000) overnight at 4°C. After four TBST washes, staining was developed with NBT/BCIP for 6–18h (Sigma, St-Louis, MO). Images were acquired with a Zeiss AxioPhot Fluorescence Microscope.
Double Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization (dblFISH)
Sections were treated with 2% H2O2 in PBS to inactivate endogenous peroxidase followed by incubation with anti-DIG antibodies POD fragments in combination with anti-DNP POD (Roche, Basel Switzerland; dilution 1:1000). Incubations with these antibodies were done separately at 4°C, overnight, for each of the antibodies. Staining with tyramide Cy3 solution or Fluorescein in PBS/Tween (1:100) was carried for 10 min each (Perkin-Elmer, Woodbridge, Ontario). Images were acquired with a Nikon A1 confocal microscope and/or Zeiss AxioPhot Fluorescence Microscope and treated with NIS-Elements Advanced Research Software or ImageJ.
Hematoxylin/Eosin staining
For histological observations of lesioned brain cryosections, Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining was carried as previously described [26]. Briefly, cryosections-containing slides were immersed in Gill’s Hematoxylin (Polysciences Inc., cat. #24243) for 5 minutes and rinsed in deionized water. Destaining was carried out with acid water, deionized water washes and Scott’s Tap Water. Slides were then immersed in Eosin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, cat. #14851) dye for 3 minutes, dried and sealed with coverslips.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR
Quantification of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a RNA transcripts within brain tissues, was performed on a BioRad CFX96 quantative Reverse Transcription PCR detection system using SsoFast EvaGreen (BioRad) fluorescent dye supermix and specific primers for each gene (S1 Table). Primers were designed in separate exon sequences using NCBI’s Primer-BLAST Program (Primer-Blast, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) ensuring products were free of primer dimers.
Total RNA was extracted from the dissected and isolated forebrain of each adult fish using homogenization with TriZol (Ambion) according to manufacturer protocol. Concentration of extracted RNA was obtained using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). Synthesis of cDNA was accomplished by reverse transcription of total RNA. From control and lesion specimens 500ng of total RNA were reverse transcribed using the QuantiTect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). Quality and purity of cDNAs was confirmed by Agarose gel Electrophoresis. In order to assay transcripts of genes of interests by qPCR, the following conditions were used: 95°C for 30s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5s and 59°C for 5s, then a melt curve progressing from 65°C to 95°C, at 5s per 0.5°C increase. Two reference genes were used for each qPCR run either ef1a, ywhaz or rpl13a. Data were analyzed using CFXManager (Bio-Rad) and compiled using GraphPad PRISM.
Statistical analyses
Statistical comparison of two groups (lesion and controls) for GFP cell counting values and qRT-PCR results was conducted using an unpaired t-test using GraphPad PRISM. An alpha-value of 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. For * p ≤ 0.05 and n.s. = not significant p > 0.05. Error bars represent standard error on the mean (SEM). Cell counts were performed on a minimum of two individuals in a blinded fashion to eliminate researcher bias.
Results
dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a are expressed in the adult zebrafish brain
Expression of dlx genes in the zebrafish brain has been reported during development [5,6,12,21] but information on the expression of such genes in adult zebrafish was still lacking. To determine if dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a are expressed in the adult zebrafish brain, we performed ISH assays in adults ranging from 3mpf to 18mpf.
Consistent with previous observations in embryos and larvae, the expression of all four dlx paralogs was abundant in ventral regions of the forebrain. Transcripts of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a were present especially in the dorsal, ventral and postcommissural nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vd, Vv and Vp) (Fig 1B–1B”’). For dlx2a and dlx5a, expression was also found within the central nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vc). The anterior part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus (PPa) was observed to be one of the regions with the most abundant expression of all four dlx genes in the adult zebrafish brain (Fig 1C–1C”’). In the midbrain, the caudal and dorsal zones of the periventricular hypothalamus (Hc and Hd) revealed abundant expression of all four dlx genes (Fig 1D–1D”’). The expression of dlx genes was consistent and similar among the four different paralogs as well as among different stages of the adult zebrafish, ranging from 3mpf to 18mpf (N = 8 for each gene), therefore not presenting an age-dependent variation during adulthood.
Schematic representation of sections depicted in the top right panel. In situ hybridization shows dlx expression in cryosections of the adult zebrafish brain. Sagittal section showing dlx5a expression in a 6 mpf fish (A). Transverse sections showing expression throughout areas of the forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain of dlx1a (B-D), dlx2a (B’-D’), dlx5a (B”-D”) and dlx6a (B”’-D”’) in 1 ypf zebrafish (N = 6 for each dlx gene). Hc.: caudal zone of the periventricular hypothalamus; Hd.: dorsal zone of the periventricular hypothalamus; PPa.: anterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus; V.: ventral telencephalic area; Vd.: dorsal nucleus of V.; Vp.: parvocellular nucleus of V.; Vv.: ventral nucleus of V. Scale bar (A): 1mm; (B-D”’): 400μm.
In situ hybridization also reveal that all four dlx paralogs are expressed in almost all niches which present constitutive proliferation in the adult zebrafish brain, providing the first suggestions that these genes may participate in constitutive proliferation (S1 Fig). Although the expression of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a was observed to be highly overlapping in the adult zebrafish brain, we cannot conclude from our results if the different dlx paralogs are co-expressed within the same individual cells.
GABAergic neurons identity for dlx-expressing cells in the adult zebrafish brain
To determine the identity of cells expressing dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a in the adult zebrafish brain, we performed co-localization analyses using double fluorescence in situ hybridization (ISH) and double immunohistochemistry assays. Based on the overlapping expression of dlx with gad1 markers and the regulatory roles for dlx genes in GABAergic neuron development, we first wanted to investigate if dlx-expressing cells could have a GABAergic interneuron identity in adulthood. Double fluorescence ISH assays were performed combining a mRNA probe recognizing one of the four dlx paralogs with gad65, a gene encoding an enzyme that catalyzes the decarboxylation of glutamate to GABA.
Widespread co-expression of dlx genes and gad65 was observed throughout the adult zebrafish forebrain. The majority of dlx2 and dlx5a-expressing cells co-expressed gad65 in the medial zone of the dorsal telencephalic area (Dm), dorsal nucleus of ventral telencephalic area (Vd), postcommissural nucleus of ventral telencephalic area (Vp), parvocellular preoptic nucleus, anterior part (PPa) and posterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus (PPp) (Fig 2I–2L) (N = 4 for dlx2a and dlx5a). In the midbrain, co-expression of gad65 and dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a was less prevalent compared to areas of the forebrain. In the ventral zone of the periventricular hypothalamus (Hv) and dorsal zone of the periventricular hypothalamus (Hd), only a small portion of dlx-expressing cells presented a GABAergic interneuron identity (S2 Fig).
Double fluorescence ISH of transverse sections of the forebrain showing expression of dlx2a (A-B) and dlx5a (C-D) in green and expression of gad65 in red (E-H). Anatomical parts indicated. Merged images showing co-localization of dlx and gad65 in yellow [I-L] (N = 4 for dlx2a and dlx5a). Double IHC with Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) and Calretinin or Calbindin shows co-localization, indicated by white arrows [N-P] (N = 6 for Calbindin and Calretinin). Merged images were created with ImageJ(32) software. Calret.: Calretinin and Calb.: Calbindin. Dm.: medial zone of dorsal telencephalic area; PGZ.: periventricular gray zone; PPa.: anterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus; PPp.: posterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus; V.: ventral telencephalic area; Vd.: dorsal nucleus of V.; Vp.: parvocellular nucleus of V.;Vs.: supracommissural nucleus of V.; Vv.: ventral nucleus of V. Scale bar: 400μm.
As there is absence of good antibodies that recognize the Dlx proteins in zebrafish, the Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) line allowed us to better investigate co-localization and quantifications of dlx5a/6a-expressing cells Even though all GABAergic neurons present inhibitory functions, these neurons can be morphologically, electrically and chemically heterogeneous, and there are several subtypes of GABAergic neurons in the CNS. Using Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) adult fish, we investigated if dlx5a/6a-expressing cells could be specifically labeled to some of the subtypes of GABAergic interneurons, namely: calbindin and calretinin. Similar to observations at developmental stages, our analyses indicate that, with a few exceptions, the majority of dlx5a/6a-expressing cells do not co-localize with these specific subtype markers (Fig 2M–2P). Co-labeling with calretinin has shown very little if any co-localization with GFP. Only a few dlx5a/6a-expressing cells appear to be calretinin neurons in the periventricular gray zone (PGZ) (Fig 2M and 2N). In fact, within the PGZ area, a few dlx5a/6a-expressing cells have also shown a calbindin identity.
Interestingly and in contrast to observations at developmental stages, in the adult zebrafish brain, we observed many dlx5a/6a-expressing cells co-localizing with calbindin within the supracommissural nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vs) and within the anterior and posterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus (PPa and PPp) in the diencephalon (Fig 2O and 2P). A few GFP positive cells also co-express calbindin within the dorsal and ventral nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vd and Vv). No co-localization was observed in areas of the hypothalamus.
Neural stem cells, but not proliferating or glial cells, express dlx5a/6a in areas of the adult zebrafish brain
As the dlx genes might be implicated in promoting neuronal proliferation [27] [28], we sought to investigate if neural stem cells (NSCs) could also express dlx genes. Our results indicate that cells expressing dlx5a/6a co-localized with the sex-determining 2 (Sox2) marker in some areas of the adult zebrafish brain, while cells expressing GFP and Sox2 were adjacent in others. The following areas of the forebrain presented a small percentage of co-localization of the two markers: the medial dorsal telencephalic area (Dm) in the dorsal and ventral nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vd and Vv). Within the supracommissural nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vs), we observed a higher percentage of co-localization than in the domains of the telencephalon as mentioned before (Fig 3).
Double IHC with Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) and Sox2 shows co-localization, indicated by white arrows, in merged images of GFP and Sox2 (C-F) (N = 8). Merged images were created with ImageJ(32) software. Hc.: caudal hypothalamus; Hd.: dorsal zone of periventricular hypothalamus; PPa.: anterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus; Sc.: suprachiasmatic nucleus; Vd.: dorsal nucleus of V. Scale bar: 400μm.
The anterior part of the parvocellular preoptic nucleus (PPa), within the diencephalon, was one of the areas with high co-localization of dlx5a/6a-expressing cells and Sox2 expression. The more rostral portions of the dorsal and ventral hypothalamus presented some co-localization of GFP and Sox2, and the most caudal portions of the hypothalamus also seemed to reveal a high percentage of GFP and Sox2 co-localization (Fig 3C, 3E and 3F).
These data suggest that, in some areas of the adult zebrafish brain, a number of dlx5a/6a-expressing cells present a neural stem cell identity, especially in the PPa and the hypothalamus, two areas where expression of all four dlx paralogs is very abundant. Giving the overlapping expression within these areas, these dlx5a/6a-expressing cells might have a role in promoting neural proliferation during adulthood in the zebrafish brain. The adjacent expression of dlx5a/6a to Sox2, clearly observed in Hd for example (Fig 3C), also suggest that many dlx-expressing cells have already reached a more differentiated state.
We also examined if Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP)-expressing cells could represent either glia populations or proliferating cells. We observed rare, if any, co-localization of GFP with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) or with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (Fig 4A–4H), giving indications that in the adult zebrafish brain, dlx5a/6a-expressing cells might not have a proliferating or glial cell identity.
Double IHC with Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) in combination with either PCNA, GFAP or TH. Labeling of GFP with PCNA (A-D) and GFAP (E-H), shows no co-localization of the two markers with GFP (N = 6). Labeling of GFP and TH (I-L) shows a few co-localizations of the two markers, indicated by white arrows. Merged images created with NIS-Elements Advanced Research Software. Scale bar: 200μm.
A few studies have suggested a possible role for dlx genes in dopaminergic subtype specification and regulation [29] [30]. Additionally, some evidence indicates co-expression of markers for GABAergic neurons and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), an enzyme that catalyzes the first reaction in dopamine biosynthesis[31]. We sought to investigate if, in the adult Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) zebrafish brain, there was co-localization of GFP and TH. Once again, results show rare instances of a few single cells co-expressing GFP and TH in the ventral telencephalic area and in the caudal zone of the hypothalamus (Hc) (Fig 4I–4L).
Taken together, these co-localization observations reveal that in the adult zebrafish brain, the majority of dlx-expressing cells seem to have a GABAergic neuronal identity. The results are summarized on Table 1.
dlx5a and dlx5a/6a are up-regulated during brain regeneration following stab wound lesion
The dlx genes are required during development for proper establishment of neuronal populations in the central nervous system. The zebrafish brain presents high levels of adult neurogenesis and regeneration, as previously mentioned. Therefore, we explored a possible participation of dlx paralogs in adult brain regeneration. In order to address this, we have used mechanical stab lesions in the telencephalon, an area with both high rates of constitutive proliferation and high expression of all four dlx genes.
We analyzed the expression of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a by in situ hybridization at 3 and 7 days-post-lesion(dpl) (3mpf to 1ypf). These two time points encompass important stages of the regeneration response, where cell death has taken place and regeneration starts being more pronounced at 3dpl and presents a peak of constitutive proliferation presumably at 7dpl [16]. Histological staining revealed disruption of brain tissue at 3dpl and repair at 7dpl. Presence of Sox2 expression also revealed differences within the contralateral hemispheres, validating the existence of an actual disruption (S3 Fig). With a few exceptions, the spatial distribution of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a transcripts remained similar during the regeneration response at the two time points observed, with expression concentrated in the dorsal (Vd) and ventral (Vv) nucleus of the ventral telencephalon in the sections analyzed (Fig 5C’–5F’ and 5G’–5J’).
Top left panel (A) shows the location of the mechanical lesion. Expression of the four dlx paralogs in controls (C-F and G-J) and lesioned brains at 3 dpl (C’-F’) and 7 dpl (G’-J’). Down-regulation of dlx5a is suggested at 3dpl (E’ indicated by gray arrow) and confirmed by RT-qPCR (B) (Student’s t-test, n = 5, p = 0.004). A slight up-regulation of dlx2a and dlx5a is seen at 7dpl compared to controls. For each gene, and for each time point, assays were carried out with at least 2 biological replicates in 3 different experimental repetitions (N = 6). RT-qPCR analyses at 7dpl (K) reveals no significant changes in expression levels of dlx1a, dlx2a and dlx6a (N = 7 for each gene each). A significant increase in dlx5a expression was observed at 7dpl (Student’s t-test, n = 7, p = 0.008). Scale bar: 400 μM.
A slight downregulation and subsequent up-regulation of dlx5a were observed at 3 and 7dpl, respectively. This was first suggested based on the intensity of ISH signal (Fig 5E’ and 5I’). At 3 dpl there seems to be a decreased and almost absence of dlx5a expression in the dorsal nucleus of ventral telencephalon (Vd) when compared to controls (Fig 5E’). At this time point, the overall distribution of dlx1a, dlx2a and dlx6a remained similar to unlesioned controls. The 7 dpl time point, revealed slight increases in the expression of dlx5a and a more widespread expression pattern within the dorsal telencephalic area as observed by in situ hybridization (Fig 5I’). These changes in dlx5a expression were also verified by experimental repetition and biologic replicates (minimum n = 6 for each dlx gene).
We did not observe apparent changes in the expression of dlx1a, dlx2a or dlx6a either 3 or 7dpl (Fig 5C’, 5D’, 5F’, 5G’, 5H’ and 5I’), nor in the expression patterns of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a or dlx6a at the site of injury where the needle was inserted in the ventricule of telencephalon at 7dpl or even in the lesioned hemisphere compared to the unlesioned one.
Possible changes in expression levels of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a were further quantified by qRT-PCR at 3 and 7dpl. Slight increases in dlx1a, dlx2a and dlx6a transcripts were seen but did not reach statistical significance at 7dpl (Fig 5K). However, a significant decrease in dlx5a expression at 3 dpl, was followed by a significant increase in dlx5a expression in the telencephalon of lesioned adult zebrafish at 7dpl (Fig 5B and 5K).
Changes in dlx expression during brain regeneration was further examined using the Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) reporter line and direct counting of GFP positive cells. The dorsal and ventral areas of the ventral telencephalon is where constitutive proliferation takes place and are also the regions were an increase seemed more visible, therefore this area was selected for quantification (Fig 6). Cell counting revealed an increase in the number of GFP-expressing cells in the ventral portions of the telencephalon of regenerating brains of adults (9mpf) at 3 dpl (average 266 [180–384] vs. 233 [99–396] in controls, N = 6) and 7pl (average 344 [244–408] vs. 247 [198–302] in controls, N = 6). At 3 dpl, this increase was not significant (Student’s t-test, p = 0.613 Fig 6F), while at 7dpl this number reached statistical significance (Student’s t-test, p = 0.008 Fig 6F).
Expression of GFP in Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) determined with a GFP antibody in controls (A and C) and regenerating brains at 3 dpl (B) and 7dpl (D). Schematic representation of the telencephalon where lesion is inflicted and areas used for cell counting of all GFP-positive cells (E) (area indicated by blue arrows bellow blue lines). Quantification of GFP+ cells in the regenerating brain at 3dpl and 7dpl (P = 0.008, N = 6) (F). Scale bar: 400 μm.
These observations suggest that, at 3 dpl, dlx5a expression specifically is downregulated, while 7 dpl, a time when the regeneration response is pronounced in the adult zebrafish brain, the dlx5a/6a bigene, possibly the dlx5a gene, may participate in and reflect an increased proliferation within the ventral area of the ventricule of the telencephalon.
Discussion
The observations presented here expand our current understanding of dlx function from the context of development to adulthood in zebrafish. Here, we report the expression of dlx genes in the adult zebrafish brain, characterize the GABAergic and NSCs identity of cells expressing dlx in adults, and the changes in expression of these genes, particularly of dlx5a and dlx5a/6a, during regeneration in a post-injury response.
The first observations of dlx1a, dlx2a and dlx5a expression in the zebrafish developing brain indicated the onset of expression at around 13h hours-post-fertilization [5,6]. The expression of the four paralogs dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a, is present throughout embryonic and larval stages as demonstrated by others [10] [21,32]. In adults, we observed that dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a are expressed similarly among the four different paralogs and independently of adult stages ranging from 3mpf to 18mpf.
In the forebrain, the domains of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a expression, namely the dorsal, ventral and parvocellular nucleus of ventral telencephalic area and diencephalon, remained consistent with observations made during embryonic development. Transcripts of dlx2a and dlx5a were also observed within the central nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vc). In fact, in many areas, dlx2a and dlx5a expression was seemingly more abundant than dlx1a and dlx6a. This was not unexpected as, in embryos, the intensity of the dlx5a ISH signal was comparatively more uniform and stronger than that of dlx6a [6]. However, we do not rule out the possibility of the results obtained here being due to less effective hybridization of mRNA probes utilized for dlx1a and dlx6a in ISH assays. In contrast to what was observed in the diencephalon of embryos, the anterior and posterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus were regions with abundant expression of all four dlx genes in the adult zebrafish brain. Yet, other domains of the diencephalon such as the hypothalamus, caudal and dorsal hypothalamus, presented abundant expression of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a genes. The spatiotemporal expression of dlx genes in the adult brain could be indicative of multiple roles, ranging from cell fate determination to neurogenesis. In fact, many of the adult zebrafish brain regions where dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a are expressed consist of neurogenic zones (S1 Fig) [20].
Given previous observations of the participation of dlx genes in GABAergic interneuron specification [7,33], we expected that in the adult zebrafish brain, many dlx-expressing cells would have a GABAergic neuronal identity. Indeed, our observations revealed that, in telencephalic regions, there is a high overlapping expression of dlx and gad65 transcripts, indicating that the great majority of dlx-expressing cells consist of GABAergic neurons in these areas. In the diencephalon, however, at the ventral and dorsal zone of the periventricular hypothalamus (Hd and Hv), only a small portion of dlx-expressing cells presented a GABAergic interneuron identity (S2 Fig). This might indicate that, in these areas, those cells are in the cell cycle and have not yet acquired the GABAergic phenotype, or that dlx-expressing cells will give rise to different identities.
The calcium binding proteins calretinin and calbindin are expressed in GABAergic and glutamatergic cortical neurons [34]. Dlx enhancers in mice have been shown to be highly active in some of the major subtypes of GABAergic interneurons [35]. Interestingly, during the early development of zebrafish, the comparison of GFP expression in Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) embryos with markers for GABAergic subtypes, revealed that a vast majority of GFP-positive cells within the telencephalon and diencephalon of 3 dpf embryos do not co-localize with any of these markers [21]. Similar to what was observed during development, our results indicate that the majority of dlx5a/6a-expressing cells do not co-localize with these specific subtypes in the adult zebrafish brain, with some exceptions. The anterior and posterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus as well as the supracommissural nucleus of ventral telencephalic area presented cluster of cells with high co-localization of GFP and Calbindin, suggesting that dlx5a/6a is highly active in Calbindin interneurons in these regions.
Apart from their known role in GABAergic neurons specification, the dlx genes can be considered pro-neural transcription factors known to promote neural proliferation [28]. Our results revealed that cells expressing dlx5a/6a genes do not seem to have a glial or proliferating cell identity in the adult brain as no co-localization was observed with GFAP or PCNA markers. Interestingly, in some areas of the forebrain and midbrain, particularly in the anterior part of parvocellular preoptic nucleus, the supracommissural nucleus of ventral telencephalic area and caudal hypothalamus we observed high overlapping co-localization of the neural stem cell marker Sox2 and GFP in the brain of Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) adults. These observations suggest a role for dlx genes in the maintenance of neural pluripotency or in promoting neural proliferation in the adult brain.
We frequently observed co-localizations in the telencephalon and diencephalon that differed from those observed within the hypothalamus domains of the adult zebrafish brain. The hypothalamus is involved in the regulation of body temperature and reproduction and can be considered a central interface in which neuronal, hormonal and vascular systems are connected [36]. Other transcription factors have been implicated in neuronal specification within the hypothalamus of the zebrafish [37]. Certain areas of the hypothalamus, especially the caudal and dorsal hypothalamus, presented very little co-localization of dlx transcripts and gad65 (S2 Fig). It was also within the Hc that the highest overlapping expression levels of dlx genes and Sox2 were observed, as well as a few occasions of co-localization of TH and GFP with Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) adult zebrafish. While co-localization of Sox2 and dlx5a/6a was abundant in the caudal hypothalamus, the expression of these genes was observed in adjacent patterns in the dorsal hypothalamus. This suggests that while in some areas of the hypothalamus these genes may be involved with the reprograming of cells to become mature neurons, in other areas of the hypothalamus, dlx transcripts may be present in recently formed mature neurons that do not have a GABAergic identity.
Due to the intense reactive proliferation in the brain during regeneration [15,16], we expected to see changes in the patterns of expression of dlx1a, dlx2a, dlx5a and dlx6a, as these genes take part in important developmental events and neuronal specification. It is presumed that at 3 dpl, cell death has taken place and the following days mark the time points with a pronounced regeneration response. At 3 dpl in situ hybridization first indicated a possible decrease in dlx5a expression, this was also confirmed by quantification of mRNA at this time point. No significant differences were observed for dlx1a, dlx2a or dlx6a at this time point by in situ hybridization nor qPCR. At 7 dpl, we observed a slightly stronger ISH staining expression of dlx2a and dlx5a in the telencephalon of regenerating brain. This time point is thought to represent a very important stage of the regeneration response and the peak of constitutive proliferation after mechanical lesion [23,38]. The expression of dlx5a appeared to be particularly stronger within the the dorsal and parvocellular nucleus of ventral telencephalic area, and this gene showed more widespread expression patterns within the dorsal telencephalic area. Although these increases were observed for dlx2a and dlx5a, in both cases, the presence of transcripts was not found adjacent or exactly at the location of injury at the ventricular zone.
Counting of GFP positive cells with the Tg(dlx6a-1.4kbdlx5a/6a:GFP) reporter line revealed a significant increase in dlx5a/6a-expressing cells in specific areas of the telencephalon at 7dpl. In this reporter line it is not fully known if the GFP reporter recapitulates the expression of dlx5a and dlx6a equally, additionally, there is an increased sensitivity of the GFP reporter and easier detection than mRNA transcripts with ISH [39]. RNA quantification analyses of the telencephalon of lesioned adult zebrafish corroborate the results observed by ISH. Slight increases in dlx1a, dlx2a and dlx6a transcript levels were observed at 7dpl and statistically significant increases were obtained for dlx5a while a decrease was observed at 3 dpl for this gene. It is important to note that the increases observed with cell counting at 3dpl, were localized to regions of the brain where the lesion was applied, more specifically, the telencephalon region encompassing the dorsal and ventral nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area, a region with high expression of dlx genes. Further exploration could determine if other regions of the brain might be contributing to the decreased expression of dlx5a observed by RNA quantification of the whole forebrain area. These results suggest that dlx genes may participate in post-injury response. Thus, increased expression of these genes may point to a participation in compensating for neuronal loss, specifically the loss of GABAergic neurons.
The events subsequent to a traumatic lesion in the CNS can lead to an increase in neurogenesis depending mainly on three aspects: the severity of the lesion, the site of the trauma, and the competency of the progenitor cells [20,40,41]. The adult mammalian brain harbors neural precursor cells (NSCs), which are a potential source of neurons for repairing injured brain tissue. Recent studies show that the telencephalic ventricular zone in the adult zebrafish brain, where the dorsal and ventral nucleus of ventral telencephalic area are located, contain NPCs that share characteristics with the NPCs in the mammalian SVZ [19,42–44]. The results obtained here reveal potential roles for the dlx genes in a regeneration response towards reappearing injured brain tissue.
Given the important roles already described for dlx genes in the CNS during development, the work presented here expands our knowledge of dlx genes function to the context of adulthood. Understanding the role of transcription factors in the adult CNS as well as the mechanisms involved in regeneration biology of the vertebrate CNS present great potentials for therapies, especially regarding human neurodegenerative disorders or acute neural injuries.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. dlx1a and dlx5a expression and comparison with neurogenic areas in the adult zebrafish brain.
Upper panel shows drawing of an adult brain sagittal section depicting neurogenic areas and zones with constitutive proliferation (adapted from Kizil C. et al., 2011). [A-B] shows expression of dlx1a and dlx5a verified with ISH. Arrows indicate the main areas where expression of dlx genes matches areas with constitutive proliferation. These areas are: olfactory bulb (OB), ventral nucleus of ventral telencephalic area (Vv), parvocellular preoptic nucleus, anterior part (PPa), posterial zone of dorsal telencephalic area (Dp), periventricular nucleus of posterior tuberculum (TPp) and caudal zone of periventricular hypothalamus (Hc) and dorsal zone of periventricular hypothalamus (Hd). Scale bar: 1mm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229549.s002
(PNG)
S2 Fig. Co-expression of dlx2a and dlx5a with gad65 in the adult zebrafish forebrain.
Double fluorescence in situ hybridization with transverse sections of the forebrain with (A-D) expression of dlx2a and dlx5a in green along with anatomical parts indicated and (E-H) expression of gad65 in red. (I-L) Co-localization of dlx and gad65 in yellow. Merged images were created with ImageJ(32) software. (N = 4 for dlx2a and dlx5a; N = 3 for dlx1a and dlx6a). Scale bar: 50μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229549.s003
(PNG)
S3 Fig. Stab lesion and tissue integrity in adult zebrafish telencephalon.
Schematic representation of lesion in the telencephalon area of adult zebrafish (A). Haematoxylin-Eosin staining and arrows indicate blood clot formation at 3 dpl (n = 3) (B) and apparent increase in cell number with higher intensity of staining at the lesioned hemisphere at 7dpl (n = 4) (C). Immunohistochemical labeling with Sox2 at 7 dpl indicates higher number of neural stem cells in the ventricular zone of the telencephalon (n = 3) (D). Magnification of image shown the contralateral hemisphere in E and regenerating hemisphere in F with increase in cells positive for Sox2 in the ventricular zone of the lesioned telencephalon. Scale bar (B-F): 200μM.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229549.s004
(PNG)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Yuchen Luo for contributions to experiments, Vishal Saxena and Gary Hatch for technical support and Dr. Marie-Andree Akimenko for discussions and suggestions.
References
- 1. Panganiban G, Rubenstein JLR. Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes. Development. 2002;129: 4371–86. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12223397 pmid:12223397
- 2. Pleasure SJ, Anderson S, Hevner R, Bagri A, Marin O, Lowenstein DH, et al. Cell migration from the ganglionic eminences is required for the development of hippocampal GABAergic interneurons. Neuron. 2000;28: 727–740. pmid:11163262
- 3. Anderson SA, Eisenstat DD, Shi L, Rubenstein JLR. Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: Dependence on Dlx genes. Science. 1997;278: 474–476. pmid:9334308
- 4. Anderson S a., Qiu M, Bulfone A, Eisenstat DD, Meneses J, Pedersen R, et al. Mutations of the homeobox genes Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 disrupt the striatal subventricular zone and differentiation of late born striatal neurons. Neuron. 1997;19: 27–37. pmid:9247261
- 5. Akimenko M a, Ekker M, Wegner J, Lin W, Westerfield M. Combinatorial expression of three zebrafish genes related to distal-less: part of a homeobox gene code for the head. J Neurosci. 1994;14: 3475–3486. pmid:7911517
- 6. Ellies DL, Stock DW, Hatch G, Giroux G, Weiss KM, Ekker M. Relationship between the genomic organization and the overlapping embryonic expression patterns of the zebrafish dlx genes. Genomics. 1997;45: 580–590. pmid:9367683
- 7. MacDonald RB, Pollack JN, Debiais-Thibaud M, Heude E, Talbot JC, Ekker M. The ascl1a and dlx genes have a regulatory role in the development of GABAergic interneurons in the zebrafish diencephalon. Dev Biol. 2013;381: 276–85. pmid:23747543
- 8. Zerucha T, Ekker M. Distal-less-related homeobox genes of vertebrates: Evolution, function, and regulation. Biochem Cell Biol. 2000;78: 593–601. pmid:11103950
- 9. Sumiyama K, Irvine SQ, Ruddle FH. The role of gene duplication in the evolution and function of the vertebrate Dlx/distal-less bigene clusters. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003;3: 151–159. pmid:12836694
- 10. Ghanem N, Jarinova O, Amores A, Long Q, Hatch G, Park BK, et al. Regulatory roles of conserved intergenic domains in vertebrate Dlx bigene clusters. Genome Res. 2003;13: 533–543. pmid:12670995
- 11. Fazel Darbandi S, Poitras L, Monis S, Lindtner S, Yu M, Hatch G, et al. Functional consequences of I56ii Dlx enhancer deletion in the developing mouse forebrain. Dev Biol. 2016;420: 32–42. pmid:27983964
- 12. Zerucha T, Stühmer T, Hatch G, Park BK, Long Q, Yu G, et al. A highly conserved enhancer in the Dlx5/Dlx6 intergenic region is the site of cross-regulatory interactions between Dlx genes in the embryonic forebrain. J Neurosci. 2000;20: 709–721. pmid:10632600
- 13. Solek CM, Feng S, Perin S, Weinschutz Mendes H, Ekker M. Lineage tracing of dlx1a/2a and dlx5a/6a expressing cells in the developing zebrafish brain. Dev Biol. 2017; pmid:28479339
- 14. Adolf B, Chapouton P, Lam CS, Topp S, Tannhäuser B, Strähle U, et al. Conserved and acquired features of adult neurogenesis in the zebrafish telencephalon. Dev Biol. 2006;295: 278–293. pmid:16828638
- 15. Becker CG, Becker T. Adult zebrafish as a model for successful central nervous system regeneration. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2008;26: 71–80. pmid:18820403
- 16. Kizil C, Kaslin J, Kroehne V, Brand M. Adult neurogenesis and brain regeneration in zebrafish. Dev Neurobiol. 2012;72: 429–461. pmid:21595047
- 17. Schmidt R, Strähle U, Scholpp S. Neurogenesis in zebrafish—from embryo to adult. Neural Dev. 2013;8: 3.
- 18. Zupanc GKH, Ott R. Cell proliferation after lesions in the cerebellum of adult teleost fish: Time course, origin, and type of new cells produced. Exp Neurol. 1999;160: 78–87. pmid:10630192
- 19. Grandel H, Kaslin J, Ganz J, Wenzel I, Brand M. Neural stem cells and neurogenesis in the adult zebrafish brain: Origin, proliferation dynamics, migration and cell fate. Dev Biol. 2006;295: 263–277. pmid:16682018
- 20. Kaslin J, Ganz J, Brand M. Proliferation, neurogenesis and regeneration in the non-mammalian vertebrate brain. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;363: 101–122. pmid:17282988
- 21. Yu M, Xi Y, Pollack J, Debiais-Thibaud M, MacDonald RB, Ekker M. Activity of dlx5a/dlx6a regulatory elements during zebrafish GABAergic neuron development. Int J Dev Neurosci. International Society for Developmental Neuroscience; 2011;29: 681–691. pmid:21723936
- 22. Eisenstat DD, Liu JK, Mione M, Zhong W, Yu G, Anderson SA, et al. DLX-1, DLX-2, and DLX-5 expression define distinct stages of basal forebrain differentiation. J Comp Neurol. 1999;414: 217–237. pmid:10516593
- 23. Schmidt R, Beil T, Strähle U, Rastegar S. Stab Wound Injury of the Zebrafish Adult Telencephalon: A Method to Investigate Vertebrate Brain Neurogenesis and Regeneration. J Vis Exp. 2014; e51753. pmid:25146302
- 24. Stock DW, Ellies DL, Zhao Z, Ekker M, Ruddle FH, Weiss KM. The evolution of the vertebrate Dlx gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93: 10858–10863. pmid:8855272
- 25. Martin SC, Heinrich G, Sandell JH. Sequence and expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase isoforms in the developing zebrafish. J Comp Neurol. 1998;396: 253–266. pmid:9634146
- 26. Sullivan-brown J, Bisher ME, Burdine RD. Embedding, Serial Sectioning and Staining of Zebrafish Embryos Using JB-4™ Resin. 2011;6: 46–55.
- 27. Petryniak M a., Potter GB, Rowitch DH, Rubenstein JLR. Dlx1 and Dlx2 Control Neuronal versus Oligodendroglial Cell Fate Acquisition in the Developing Forebrain. Neuron. 2007;55: 417–433. pmid:17678855
- 28. Castro DS, Martynoga B, Parras C, Ramesh V, Pacary E, Garcia LG, et al. A novel function of the proneural factor Ascl1 in progenitor proliferation identified by genome-wide characterization of its targets. 2011; 930–945.
- 29. Saino-Saito S, Berlin R, Baker H. Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 Expression in the Adult Mouse Brain: Relationship to Dopaminergic Phenotypic Regulation. J Comp Neurol. 2003;461: 18–30. pmid:12722102
- 30. Brill MS, Snapyan M, Wohlfrom H, Ninkovic J, Jawerka M, Mastick GS, et al. A Dlx2- and Pax6-Dependent Transcriptional Code for Periglomerular Neuron Specification in the Adult Olfactory Bulb. 2008;28: 6439–6452. pmid:18562615
- 31. Zhang X, Van Den Pol AN. Dopamine / Tyrosine Hydroxylase Neurons of the Hypothalamic Arcuate Nucleus Release GABA, Communicate with Dopaminergic and Other Arcuate Neurons, and Respond to Dynorphin, Met-Enkephalin, and Oxytocin. 2015;35: 14966–14982. pmid:26558770
- 32. MacDonald RB, Debiais-Thibaud M, Talbot JC, Ekker M. The relationship between dlx and gad1 expression indicates highly conserved genetic pathways in the zebrafish forebrain. Dev Dyn. 2010;239: 2298–2306. pmid:20658694
- 33. Anderson SA, Eisenstat DD, Shi L, Rubenstein JL. Interneuron Migration from Basal Forebrain to Neocortex: Dependence on Dlx Genes. Science (80-). 1997;278: 474–476. pmid:9334308
- 34. Defelipe J, López-cruz PL, Benavides-piccione R, Bielza C, Larrañaga P, Anderson S, et al. New insights into the classification and nomenclature of cortical GABAergic interneurons. 2014;14: 202–216.
- 35. Ghanem N, Yu M, Long J, Hatch G, Rubenstein JL, Ekker M. Distinct cis-regulatory elements from the Dlx1/Dlx2 locus mark different progenitor cell populations in the ganglionic eminences and different subtypes of adult cortical interneurons. J Neurosci. 2007;27: 5012–5022. pmid:17494687
- 36. Nagpal J, Herget U, Choi MK, Ryu S. Anatomy, development, and plasticity of the neurosecretory hypothalamus in zebrafish. Cell Tissue Res. Cell and Tissue Research; 2019;375: 5–22.
- 37. Machluf Y, Gutnick A, Levkowitz G. Development of the zebrafish hypothalamus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1220: 93–105. pmid:21388407
- 38. Kyritsis N, Kizil C, Zocher S, Kroehne V, Kaslin J, Freudenreich D, et al. Acute Inflammation Initiates the Regenerative Response in the Adult Zebrafish Brain. Science. 2012;338: 1353–1356. pmid:23138980
- 39. Long Q, Meng A, Wang M, Jessen JR, Farrell MJ, Lin S. GATA-1 expression pattern can be recapitulated in living transgenic zebrafish using GFP reporter gene. Development. 1997;124: 4105–4111. pmid:9374406
- 40. Endo T, Yoshino J, Kado K, Tochinai S. Brain regeneration in anuran amphibians. Dev Growth Differ. 2007;49: 121–129. pmid:17335433
- 41. Leker RR, Soldner F, Velasco I, Gavin DK, Androutsellis-Theotokis A, McKay RDG. Long-lasting regeneration after ischemia in the cerebral cortex. Stroke. 2007;38: 153–161. pmid:17122419
- 42. Viales RR, Diotel N, Ferg M, Armant O, Eich J, Alunni A, et al. The helix-loop-helix protein Id1 controls stem cell proliferation during regenerative neurogenesis in the adult zebrafish telencephalon. Stem Cells. 2015;33: 892–903. pmid:25376791
- 43. Lam CS, Ma M, Stra U. gfap and nestin Reporter Lines Reveal Adult Zebrafish Brain. 2009; 475–486.
- 44. Kishimoto N, Shimizu K, Sawamoto K. Neuronal regeneration in a zebrafish model of adult brain injury. Dis Model Mech. 2012;5: 200–209. pmid:22028327