Evolutionary conservation and post-translational control of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase in land plants

Sara Alegre; Jesús Pascual; Andrea Trotta; Martina Angeleri; Moona Rahikainen; Mikael Brosche; Barbara Moffatt; Saijaliisa Kangasjärvi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227466

Abstract

Trans-methylation reactions are intrinsic to cellular metabolism in all living organisms. In land plants, a range of substrate-specific methyltransferases catalyze the methylation of DNA, RNA, proteins, cell wall components and numerous species-specific metabolites, thereby providing means for growth and acclimation in various terrestrial habitats. Trans-methylation reactions consume vast amounts of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) as a methyl donor in several cellular compartments. The inhibitory reaction by-product, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH), is continuously removed by SAH hydrolase (SAHH), which essentially maintains trans-methylation reactions in all living cells. Here we report on the evolutionary conservation and post-translational control of SAHH in land plants. We provide evidence suggesting that SAHH forms oligomeric protein complexes in phylogenetically divergent land plants and that the predominant protein complex is composed by a tetramer of the enzyme. Analysis of light-stress-induced adjustments of SAHH in Arabidopsis thaliana and Physcomitrella patens further suggests that regulatory actions may take place on the levels of protein complex formation and phosphorylation of this metabolically central enzyme. Collectively, these data suggest that plant adaptation to terrestrial environments involved evolution of regulatory mechanisms that adjust the trans-methylation machinery in response to environmental cues.

Citation: Alegre S, Pascual J, Trotta A, Angeleri M, Rahikainen M, Brosche M, et al. (2020) Evolutionary conservation and post-translational control of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase in land plants. PLoS ONE 15(7): e0227466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466

Editor: Evangelia V. Avramidou, Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems of Athens, GREECE

Received: December 18, 2019; Accepted: June 30, 2020; Published: July 17, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Alegre et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was financially supported by Academy of Finland (www.aka.fi) project 307719 to SK, 325122 to the salary of JP, and the Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Primary Producers 2014-2019 (307335). SA and MR received salary from the University of Turku Doctoral Programme in Molecular Life Sciences (https://www.utu.fi/en/research/utugs/doctoral-programme-in-molecular-life-sciences). MR also received salary from the Turku University Foundation (https://www.yliopistosaatio.fi/en/) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation Varsinais-Suomi Regional Fund (https://skr.fi/en/regional-funds/varsinais-suomi-regional-fund). MB was funded by the University of Helsinki (www.helsinki.fi). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Land plants have evolved sophisticated biochemical machineries that support cell metabolism, growth and acclimation in various terrestrial habitats. One of the most common biochemical modifications occurring on biological molecules is methylation, which is typical for DNA, RNA, proteins, and a vast range of metabolites. Trans-methylation reactions are therefore important in a relevant number of metabolic and regulatory interactions, which determine physiological processes during the entire life cycle of plants. Trans-methylation reactions are carried out by methyl transferases (MTs), which can be classified into O-MTs, N-MTs, C-MTs and S-MTs based on the atom that hosts the methyl moiety [1,2]. All these enzymes require S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) as a methyl donor [3]. Among MTs, O-MTs form a large group of substrate-specific enzymes capable of methylating RNA, proteins, pectin, monolignols as well as various small molecules in different cellular compartments [2].

The availability of SAM is a prerequisite for methylation, while the methylation reaction by-product, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH), which competes for the same binding site on the MT, is a potent inhibitor of MT activity and must therefore be efficiently removed [4]. To ensure the maintenance of SAM-dependent trans-methylation capacity, SAH is rapidly hydrolysed by S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase (SAHH, EC 3.3.1.1) in a reaction that yields L-homocysteine (HCY) and adenosine (ADO) [5]. Subsequently, methionine is regenerated from HCY by cobalamin-independent methionine synthase (CIMS, EC 2.1.1.14) using methyltetrahydrofolate as a methyl donor. Finally, methionine is converted to SAM in an ATP-dependent reaction driven by SAM synthase, also known as methionine adenosyltransferase (SAMS/MAT, EC 2.5.1.6). This set of reactions are collectively termed as the Activated Methyl Cycle (AMC).

SAHH is the only known eukaryotic enzyme capable of hydrolysing SAH, and therefore a key player in the maintenance of cellular transmethylation potential. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome encodes two SAHH isoforms, SAHH1 (AT4G13940) and SAHH2 (AT3G23810) and particularly SAHH1 is indispensable for physiological functions at different developmental stages [6–8]. Null mutation of SAHH1 has been reported embryo lethal in A. thaliana and severe symptoms caused by SAHH deficiency have been reported in human [6,9,10] whereas there were no morphological abnormalities in homozygous A. thaliana sahh2 T-DNA insertion mutants [6]. Mutants suffering from impaired SAHH1 function, including the knock-down sahh1 and homology-induced gene silencing 1 (hog1), were viable but showed delayed germination, slow growth and short primary roots [6,11]. Evidently, SAHH is crucial in ensuring accurate metabolic and regulatory reactions in the cell. Even though a number of post-translational modifications (PTMs) has been detected on A. thaliana SAHH [2], the exact regulatory mechanisms remain poorly understood.

At the amino acid sequence level, SAHH is one of the most highly conserved enzymes across the kingdoms of life [12]. Crystallography and structural studies from phylogenetically distant species have reported SAHH to form dimers, tetramers and hexamers in plant, mammalian and bacterial species [13–16]. The high-resolution crystal structure of Lupinus luteus SAHH1 suggested that in higher plants the enzyme would form functional dimers with a calculated molecular mass of 110 kDa [14,15]. However, in A. thaliana leaves SAHH1 and SAHH2 were predominantly detected in an oligomeric protein complex called SAHH complex 4, which has an approximate molecular weight of 200 kDa [17]. The subunit composition of this abundant oligomeric SAHH complex has not been resolved and potential controversy behind these observations therefore remains unclear. It should be noted, however, that the pioneering work on the L. luteus SAHH1 was established by in vitro studies using gel filtration and crystallography approaches, and the structural studies were conducted with a recombinant, not post-translationally modified enzyme [14,15].

Here we report on the evolutionary conservation and biochemical characteristics of SAHH in land plants. We find that a predominant oligomeric SAHH complex with similar apparent molecular weight as A. thaliana SAHH complex 4 can be detected in phylogenetically divergent land plants, and provide evidence suggesting that in A. thaliana the protein complex is a tetrameric form of the enzyme. Regulatory adjustments observed on SAHH in high-light-exposed A. thaliana and Physcomitrella patens further suggest that both angiosperms and bryophytes respond to light-induced stress by regulatory adjustments in this metabolically central enzyme.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Arabidopsis thaliana wild type accession Columbia-0, a transgenic A. thaliana line stably expressing SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1 [18], Brassica oleracea convar. acephala varieties Half Tall and Black Magic (kales) and Lupinus luteus were grown in peat:vermiculite (2:1) and 50% relative humidity at 8-hour light period under 130 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 and 22°C. Samples were collected after 4 weeks of growth. Spinacia oleracea (spinach) and Brassica oleracea convar. italica (broccoli) were purchased from the local supermarket. Physcomitrella patens was grown for 13 days on agar plates in minimum media [19] in a 16-hour photoperiod under 45 μmol photons m^-2 sec^-1 at 24°C. For high light stress experiments, A. thaliana was grown for 16 days in a 12-hour light period under 130 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 and thereafter shifted to 800 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 at 26°C at a 12-hour light period for 2 days. P. patens was grown as described above and shifter to 500 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 in a 16-hour light period for 2 days.

Analysis of publicly available transcript profiles

O-methyltransferases were selected from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/) (September 2019) using the following search criteria: “O-methyltransferases” + “Arabidopsis thaliana” + “reviewed”. This list was supplemented with the Activated Methyl Cycle enzymes according to Rahikainen et al. [2]. Together, the selected O-MTs and AMC enzymes formed a total of 40 genes, which were used as the input in GENEVESTIGATOR [20]. This input was assigned to 39 genes since AT5G17920 and AT3G03780, encoding CIMS1 and CIMS2, respectively could not be distinguished because they share the same probe in Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 microarray. The database search was limited to “Only Columbia-0 Wild Type from Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 genome array”. The “perturbations” tool from GENEVESTIGATOR was used to determine in which experimental conditions the selected genes were differentially expressed. Experiments in which at least 60% (24 out of 39) of the input genes were differentially expressed (p-value <0.05) were selected for hierarchical clustering. The perturbations were hierarchically clustered with R package pheatmap (v1.0.12) [21] using Ward´s method and Euclidean distance.

Confocal microscopy

Fluorescence from EGFP was imaged with a confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM780 with either C-Apochromat 40x/1.20 W Korr M27 or Plan-Apochromat 20x/0.8 objective. EGFP was excited at 488 nm and detected at 493 to 598 nm wave length and chlorophyll fluorescence was excited at 633 nm and detected at 647 to 721 nm wave length. Hectian strands were visualized by plasmolysis with 1 M NaCl and imaged after 6 minutes incubation. Images were created with Zeiss Zen 2.1 software version 11.0.0.190.

Isolation of protein extracts and biochemical analysis of SAHH

Leaves of A. thaliana, B. oleracea convar. acephala (Half Tall and Black Magic), B. oleracea convar. italica, L. luteus and S. oleracea, and aerial parts of P. patens were ground in liquid nitrogen and mixed with extraction buffer [10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl₂, supplemented with protease (Pierce EDTA-free Minitablets; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and phosphatase (PhosSTOP; Roche) inhibitors]. The samples were centrifuged at 18,000 g for 15 minutes and the soluble fractions were taken for further analysis.

For biochemical analysis of A. thaliana SAHH complex 4, soluble protein fractions were treated with 0.25%, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; CAS Number 151-21-3) and/or 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT; CAS Number 3483-12-3) in a total volume of 20 μL for 60 minutes as indicated in the figure legends. To assess protein complex formation, soluble protein fractions corresponding to 5 μg of protein were separated on Clear Native (CN) PAGE with a 7.5–12% gradient of acrylamide as in [17]. 2D-CN PAGE of A. thaliana and spinach leaf soluble proteins was performed with 90 μg of protein as in [22]. Protein spots on the 2D map were recognized based on their shape, position and intensity when compared to the 2D protein maps of A. thaliana soluble protein extracts reported previously [17,23].

For mass spectrometry analysis of A. thaliana and spinach SAHH-containing spots, excised spots were reduced, alkylated and digested with trypsin as in Rahikainen at al., 2017 [17]. Digested samples were analyzed in a nanoflow HPLC system (EasyNanoLC1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a 20 x 0.1 mm i.d. pre-column combined with a 150 mm x 75 μm i.d. analytical column, both packed with 5 μm Reprosil C18-bonded silica (Dr Maisch GmbH) and injection to an electrospray ionization (ESI) source coupled to a Q-Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific) mass spectrometer. Peptides were separated in a three-step 20-minute gradient: from 3% to 43% solvent B in 10 minutes, followed by an increase to 100% in 5 minutes, and 5 minutes of 100% solvent B. Samples were analyzed in Data Dependent Acquisition (DDA) mode. The top 10 most intense precursors in each scan (m/z 300–2000) were selected for higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation using an exclusion window of 10 seconds. Protein identification was performed in Proteome Discoverer 2.2 using Mascot v. 2.4 and against the non-redundant A. thaliana proteome (TAIR10) appended with a collection of the most common contaminants in the case of A. thaliana and against “Viridiplantae” UniProtKB database in the case of spinach. Monoisotopic mass, a maximum of two missed cleavages, 10 ppm precursor mass tolerance, 0.02 Da fragment mass tolerance and charge ≥ 2 + were the settings used for the searches. Methionine oxidation, N-term acetylation and serine, threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation were allowed as dynamic modifications and cysteine carbamidomethylation as static. PhosphoRS filter and Decoy Database Search using 0.01% (strict) and 0.05% (relaxed) false discovery rate (FDR) confidence thresholds were used to validate the confidence of the identifications.

Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed as in [24]. Phos-tag gel electrophoresis (WAKO) with 7.5% (w/v) acrylamide in the separation gel was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (www.wako-chem.co.jp/english/labchem). SAHH was detected by immunoblotting with anti-SAHH antibody [18] or by using SYPRO as a protein stain as described in [22]. ADENOSINE KINASE (ADK) was detected by anti-ADK antibody as in [22]. The experiments were repeated at least three times and representative images are shown. Immunoblot intensities were acquired using the Fiji software [25]. T-test was applied to the numerical values in R Studio environment [26].

Amino acid alignment and construction of phylogeny tree

SAHH amino acid sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana (accession AT4G13940; The Arabidopsis Information Resource, www.arabidopsis.org), Lupinus luteus (accession Q9SP37; https://www.uniprot.org), Brassica oleracea convar. capitata, (accession Bol033424; https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html), Spinacia oleracea (accession A0A0K9RFV6; https://www.uniprot.org) and Physcomitrella patens (accession Pp3c19_13810V3.1; https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/) were aligned using ClustalW Multiple Alignment [27] in BioEdit Version 7.2.5. Brassica oleracea convar. acephala amino acid sequence was unavailable, thus Brassica oleracea convar. capitata was used as its closest sequence available. Identities and similarities were reckoned in BioEdit by pairwise comparison with BLOSUM62 matrix. Phylogenetic tree was built with the same amino acid sequences plus human SAHH1 (accession P23526; https://www.uniprot.org) using Neighbor-Joining method [28] in MEGA7.

Results

Dynamics of O-MT mRNA abundance in A. thaliana

The accuracy and biochemical specificity of trans-methylation reactions stem from a high number of substrate-specific MTs, whose expression patterns can be highly responsive to both endogenous and exogenous signals. Here we focused on AMC enzymes and the O-MTs, which are well known for their functions in the methylation of small metabolites that accumulate upon environmental perturbations. To illustrate the dynamism of O-MT transcript abundance in A. thaliana, we performed an exploratory analysis using the “Perturbations” tool in GENEVESTIGATOR. Reviewed O-MTs from A. thaliana gene list were obtained from UniProt (www.uniprot.org; September 2019) and this list was supplemented with enzymes of the AMC (S1 Table). Perturbations in which at least 60% (24 out of 39) of the genes for the AMC enzymes and selected MTs with a p-value <0.05 were considered as differentially expressed and were selected to build the cluster heatmap.

As shown in Fig 1, hierarchical clustering of the gene expression data suggested dynamic adjustments in O-MT transcript abundance in response to a number of perturbations, which formed seven clusters. Clusters 6 and 7, branched out from the rest of clusters and included processes related to hormonal signalling and seed germination, respectively, while clusters 1 to 5 were comprised of perturbation categories related to light conditions, biotic, abiotic and chemical stress, and other physiological processes. These findings supported the view that O-MTs are highly regulated at the level of mRNA abundance and contribute to a multitude of metabolic processes in different compartments of plant cells.

Download:

Fig 1. Hierarchically clustered heatmap depicting dynamic adjustments in the transcript abundance for genes encoding O-methyltransferases (O-MTs) and enzymes of the activated methyl cycle in A. thaliana.

The analysis was performed using the “Perturbations” tool in GENEVESTIGATOR. Experiments in which at least 60% of the input genes were differently expressed were selected to build the cluster heatmap. The input genes were retrieved from UniProt reviewed database by searching for “O-methyltransferase” and filtering for species (Arabidopsis thaliana), and this list was combined with genes encoding the AMC enzymes (S1 Table). *This gene represents both AT5G17920 and AT3G03780 as they were indistinguishable because they share the same probe in Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 microarray chip.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.g001

Sub-cellular localization of SAHH1 in A. thaliana leaves

Next we assessed the sub-cellular localization of A. thaliana SAHH1. Confocal microscopy imaging of leaves of four-week-old A. thaliana plants stably expressing an EGFP-SAHH1 fusion protein under the native SAHH1 promoter (SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1) [18], revealed that SAHH localized to multiple sub-cellular compartments (Fig 2). However, SAHH1 was not uniformly localized within the cells, but rather highly organized to various cellular structures. SAHH1 was found dynamically associated with cytoplasmic strands, along the plasma membrane, in punctate structures, and around chloroplasts (Fig 2, S1 Video). In line with a previous report [18], strong fluorescence arising from EGFP-SAHH1 was also detected in the nucleus (Fig 2E). The nucleolus, however, was completely devoid of SAHH1 (Fig 2E). Imaging of wild type leaves with the confocal microscopy settings used to detect EGFP did not reveal signals arising from potential autofluorescent compounds (S1 Fig, S2 Video, S2 Table). Immunoblot analysis of protein extracts separated on Clear Native (CN) gels revealed the presence of EGFP-SAHH1 in oligomeric protein complexes similar to those observed in wild type, and especially the abundant SAHH complex 4 (Fig 2G) [17]. Moreover, immunoblot analysis of SDS-gels confirmed the presence of EGFP-SAHH1 in the leaf extracts, whereas free EGFP could not be observed (S1 Fig).

Download:

Fig 2. Sub-cellular localization of SAHH1 in A. thaliana leaves.

A-F) Confocal microscopy images obtained from transgenic plants stably expressing SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1. EGFP-SAHH1 was localized to cytoplasmic strands with associated bodies (A), vesicular structures (B), reticulate constructions (C), stomatal guard cells (D), nuclei (E) and the plasma membrane (F). The red color corresponds to chlorophyll autofluorescence from chloroplasts. The scale bars correspond to10 μm. G) Immunoblot analysis depicting the presence of EGFP-SAHH1 in oligomeric protein complexes. Leaf extracts from A. thaliana Col-0 and a transgenic line expressing SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1 were isolated, separated on Clear Native gel electrophoresis and immunodetected with anti-SAHH antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.g002

Assessment of A. thaliana SAHH by 2D gel electrophoresis

Previously, we detected the presence of A. thaliana SAHH1 and SAHH2 in oligomeric compositions, including the SAHH complex 4 [17,22,23], suggesting that the SAHH isoforms are likely to form hetero-oligomeric complexes. We also found that the abundant A. thaliana SAHH complex 4 co-migrated with another abundant protein spot containing e.g. CARBONIC ANHYDRASE 1 (CA1; previously identified as the chloroplastic SALICYLIC ACID-BINDING PROTEIN 1 SABP3) [29, 30], whereas other abundant co-migrating protein spots were not detected on a 2D or 3D Clear Native gel systems [17,23]. The following proteomic approach was therefore designed to decipher whether CA1 forms a component in the SAHH complex 4 (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Biochemical analysis of A. thaliana SAHH.

A) A. thaliana leaf extracts were incubated in the presence and absence of 0.25% SDS and thereafter separated on Clear Native (CN) gels. SAHH was detected by immunoblotting using anti-SAHH antibody. B) A. thaliana leaf extracts were incubated in the presence and absence of 0.25% SDS and thereafter separated on Clear Native (CN) gels followed by 12% acrylamide SDS-PAGE in the second dimension, which was stained with a total protein stain (SYPRO). The SAHH-containing major spots originating from the SAHH complex 4, as well as CARBONIC ANHYDRASE 1 (CA1), FRUCTOSE BISPHOSPHATE ALDOLASE (FBA), GLYCINE DECARBOXYLASE P-PROTEIN 1 (GLDPC1), FERREDOXIN-DEPENDENT GLUTAMATE SYNTHASE 1 (FD GOGAT), CLPC HOMOLOGUE 1 (CLPC1), COBALAMIN-INDEPENDENT METHIONINE SYNTHASE (CIMS1), THIOGLUCOSIDE GLUCOHYDROLASE 1 (TGG1), and GLUTAMINE SYNTHASE 2 (GLN2) are marked. C) A. thaliana leaf extracts were separated on 2D-CN PAGE and SAHH and ADK were detected by immunoblotting using anti-SAHH and anti-ADK antibodies. SAHH complex 4, which does not co-migrate with ADK, is marked with an arrow. D) A. thaliana leaf extracts corresponding to 100 μg of protein were fractionated by isoelectric focusing in a pH range from 3 to 11 and subsequently separated by 12% acrylamide SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. E) A. thaliana leaf extracts corresponding to 25 μg of protein were fractionated on CN-PAGE and the protein complexes were thereafter separated on 7.5% acrylamide Phostag-PAGE or on a similar 7.5% acrylamide SDS-PAGE lacking the Phostag reagent. SAHH complex 4 in the horizontal lane of 1D CN-PAGE is indicated by an arrowhead. SAHH immunoblots of 1D Phostag and 1D SDS-PAGE are shown in parallel to the 2D gels to indicate the SAHH band patterns on the different gel systems. The presence of a slow-migrating SAHH species on the Phostag gel is indicated by arrows.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.g003

The stability of the SAHH-containing complexes was first assessed by using SDS as a detergent and DTT as a reducing agent. Upon treatment of soluble leaf extracts with 1% SDS, the SAHH complexes 1, 2 and 3 became dispersed and also the SAHH complexes 4 and 5 became less abundant when separated by CN-PAGE (S2 Fig). In contrast, treatment of soluble leaf extracts with 10 mM DTT did not affect the stability of SAHH complex 4 (S2 Fig).

Immunoblot analysis with anti-SAHH antibody suggested that pre-treatment of soluble leaf extracts with 0.25% SDS did not alter the migration of SAHH complex 4 on CN-PAGE (Fig 3A). In line with this finding, the SAHH-containing protein spot was observed on 2D CN-PAGE in both non-treated and SDS-treated samples (Fig 3B). In contrast, the GLUTAMINE SYNTHASE 2 (GLN2) homo-octamer, which was present in the non-treated control sample, disappeared upon pre-treatment with 0.25% SDS (Fig 3B). These findings suggested that the stability of protein complexes was differentially affected by the 0.25% SDS treatment. Indeed, when the protein complexes were separated on 2D CN-PAGE, the abundant CA1-containing protein spot, which co-migrated with SAHH in control samples, no longer co-migrated with SAHH in the SDS-treated samples (Fig 3B). This finding indicated that the CA1-containing spot did not contain stoichiometric components of SAHH complex 4. The altered localization of CA1 on the 2D SDS-PAGE was likely due to monomerization of the CA1 complex by the SDS-treatment. Another abundant protein spot that co-migrated with SAHH complex 4 was identified as chloroplastic Fructose Bisphosphate Aldolase (FBA) (Fig 3B) [17], which as a chloroplastic protein does not co-localize with SAHH in the cell (Fig 2A) and is therefore highly unlikely to interact with SAHH. Moreover, immunoblot analysis of 2D CN gels did not provide evidence for co-migration of SAHH complex 4 and ADENOSINE KINASE (ADK) (Fig 3C), even though SAHH and ADK are known to interact in planta [18]. Based on these findings, the co-migration of SAHH1 and SAHH2 in native gel electrophoresis [22,23], and the apparent 200 kDa MW of the complex, it can be deduced that the SAHH complex 4 may be composed by a hetero-oligomeric tetramer of the enzyme, although the relative proportion of the two SAHH isoforms within these complexes remains to be established.

Next we assessed the extent to which SAHH is present in different forms in A. thaliana leaf extracts. Isoelectric focusing and 2D SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis detected SAHH in multiple spots with different pIs and three different molecular masses (Fig 3D). Such variety of combinations may arise from various combinations of PTMs, which could allow enormous versatility in the regulation of SAHH function.

The final approach was designed to explore whether SAHH is differentially phosphorylated within the different oligomeric compositions. To this end, soluble leaf extracts were run on CN-PAGE, followed by separation of differentially phosphorylated proteins on Phostag gels in the second dimension (Fig 3E). In parallel, a control lane was separated on an SDS-PAGE which, similarly to the Phostag gel, was devoid of urea. Immunoblotting of the Phostag gels with anti-SAHH antibody revealed slow-migrating protein spots, indicative of SAHH phosphorylation in complexes 3, 4 and 5 (Fig 3E).

Evolutionary conservation of SAHH in land plants

To gain insights into evolutionary conservation of SAHH, we first compared the amino acid sequences of SAHH in divergent plant species, including A. thaliana, L. luteus, B. oleracea, S. oleracea and P. patens (Fig 4). A. thaliana and B. oleracea are closely related species and showed 99% SAHH amino acid sequence similarity (Fig 4A and 4B, Table 1). Even between the more distantly related species, pair-wise amino acid comparison between L. luteus and P. patens SAHH indicated 90% similarity (Fig 4A and 4B, Table 1). A. thaliana SAHH1 has been reported to undergo phosphorylation [17, 31–33], S-nitrosylation [34,35], acetylation [31] and ubiquitination [36] at multiple sites. Majority of the experimentally described PTMs sites were conserved in the plant species studied (Fig 4A), suggesting that post-translational regulation of SAHH could be a conserved feature among land plants (Fig 4A).

Download:

Fig 4. Evolutionary conservation of SAHH on protein level.

A) Amino acid sequence alignment of SAHH1 between A. thaliana, L. luteus, B. oleracea, S. oleracea and P. patens. Ac, Lysine Acetylation; P, phosphorylation; Nt, N-terminus Proteolysis; Sn, S-nitrosylation; Ub, ubiquitination. B) Phylogenetic tree based on SAHH1 amino acid sequence constructed using the neighbor-joining method. Numbers represent substitution per amino acid based on data from 500 trees. C) SAHH containing protein complexes in evolutionarily divergent plant species as detected by anti-SAHH antibody. Total soluble protein extracts of A. thaliana, B. oleracea convar italic (broccoli), B. oleracea convar acephala var. Half Tall (kale) and B. oleracea convar acephala Black Magic (kale), L. luteus, S. oleracea and P. patens were separated on CN-PAGE. A. thaliana protein complexes typically detected by anti-SAHH antibody are indicated by numbers. The abundant protein complex detected by anti-SAHH antibody is indicated by arrow.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.g004

Download:

Table 1. Pair-wise comparison of SAHH1 amino acid sequences from A. thaliana, L. luteus, B. oleracea, S. oleracea and P. patens. Identities and similarities are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.t001

Assessment of potential conservation of SAHH complex formation across evolutionarily distant plants by CN-PAGE and immunoblotting with the anti-SAHH antibody detected a predominant protein complex, which displayed similar apparent molecular weight as the A. thaliana SAHH complex 4 in all the plant species studied (Fig 4C).

To examine the abundant SAHH protein complex in spinach (S. oleracea) leaves, their soluble foliar proteins were separated on 2D CN-gels and the Sypro-stained map of protein spots was compared with those obtained from mass spectrometry analysis of A. thaliana leaves in this study (S3 Fig) and in previous reports [17,23]. Immunoblot analysis detected SAHH in a predominant protein spot that displayed similar localization in the 2D CN gel in both species (S3 Fig). The immunoblot was then overlaid on the Sypro-stained protein map, and the protein complexes that coincided with the SAHH immuno-response were excised from the 2D gels and subjected for analysis by mass spectrometry (S3 Fig). This approach identified SAHH1 and SAHH2 isoforms from the spot that originated from A. thaliana (S3 Fig, S3 Table). Distinct SAHH isoforms, annotated as Adenosylhomocysteinase, were also identified from the protein spot that originated from spinach (S3 Fig, S3 Table). These findings suggested that an approximately 200 kDa SAHH-containing protein complex is present also in spinach leaves (Fig 4, S3 Fig, S3 Table). Likewise, a co-migrating protein complex was also detected in 1D CN-PAGE of protein extracts isolated from L. luteus (Fig 4C), for which the resolved crystal structure suggested that SAHH would be active as a dimer [14,15]. Taken together, these results suggested that SAHH is a conserved enzyme, which may form similar oligomeric protein complexes in phylogenetically different land plants.

Light-induced adjustments of SAHH in A. thaliana and P. patens

To assess stress-induced adjustments in SAHH, we exposed the two well-established, phylogenetically different model plants, A. thaliana and P. patens, to high irradiance levels for two days. Immunoblot analysis of protein complexes separated on CN-PAGE suggested a subtle but statistically significant decrease in the abundance of SAHH complex 4 in high-light-exposed A. thaliana. P. patens in turn showed a slight accumulation of the complex that co-migrated with A. thaliana SAHH complex 4 (Fig 5A and 5B and S4 Fig). A detectable, however statistically insignificant, decrease was also observed in the abundance of a complex denoted SAHH complex 2 in high-light-exposed A. thaliana (Fig 5A and 5B and S4 Fig, [17]). P. patens, in contrast, responded by somewhat variable, statistically insignificant increases in the abundance of a protein complex, which immuno-reacted with the anti-SAHH antibody and co-migrated with the A. thaliana SAHH complex 2 in CN gels (Fig 5A and 5B, S4 Fig).

Download:

Fig 5. Light-stress-induced adjustments in SAHH.

A. thaliana was grown under 130 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 for 16 days and thereafter shifted 800 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 for 2 days. P. patens as a shade-adapted moss species was grown under 45 μmol photons m^-2 sec^-1 for 13 days and thereafter illuminated under 500 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 for two days. SAHH was separated by gel-based systems and immunodetected by using an anti-SAHH antibody. Coomassie-stained membranes are shown as loading controls for each experiment. A) Oligomeric protein complexes as detected by anti-SAHH antibody and clear native (CN)-PAGE in A. thaliana and P. patens in growth light (GL) and after 2-day illumination under high light (2dHL). Six oligomeric protein complexes detected by the anti-SAHH antibody in A. thaliana are indicated by numbers. The lower panel depicts an immunoblot with a shorter exposure time for visualization and quantification of the abundant SAHH complex 4. B) Quantification of protein complexes recognized by α-SAHH antibody in Arabidopsis thaliana and Physcomitrella patens in growth light and after two-day exposure to high light. C2 and C4 refer to Arabidopsis SAHH complexes 2 and 4, and complexes with similar apparent molecular weights in P. patens. Relative values are presented. The t-test p-values obtained were 0.053 for A. thaliana C2, 0,083 for P. patens complex that co-migrated with A. thaliana C2, 0.0008 for A. thaliana C4 and 0.001 for P. patens complex that co-migrated with A. thaliana C4. The asterisks indicate statistically significant difference at P<0.005; n = 3. C) SAHH protein phosphorylation as detected by anti-SAHH antibody and Phostag-PAGE in A. thaliana and P. patens in growth light (GL) and after 2-day illumination under high light (2dHL). D) SAHH protein abundance as detected by anti-SAHH antibody and SDS-PAGE in A. thaliana and P. patens in growth light (GL) and after 2-day illumination under high light (2dHL).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.g005

Analysis of SAHH phosphorylation by Phostag gel electrophoresis suggested light-dependent phosphoregulation, which was particularly evident in A. thaliana (Fig 5C, S4 Fig). In A. thaliana, a slow-migrating form of SAHH was detected in leaf extracts isolated from growth light conditions, while in high-light-exposed leaves such phosphorylated form of SAHH was barely detectable (Fig 5C, S4 Fig). P. patens also displayed slow-migrating forms that could be detected with the anti-SAHH antibody, but changes in the intensity of the phosphorylated SAHH species were less obvious as compared to those observed in A. thaliana (Fig 5C, S4 Fig). The total abundance of SAHH did not differ between the treatments (Fig 5D, S4 Fig). Hence, both A. thaliana and P. patens displayed potential regulatory adjustments in SAHH, but the responses differed between the angiosperm and bryophyte models.

Discussion

SAHH is required to maintain trans-methylation reactions in different cellular compartments

Trans-methylation reactions are intrinsic to cellular metabolism and a prerequisite for normal plant growth and development. Reflecting the enormous diversity of species-specific trans-methylation reactions that take place in metabolic and regulatory networks, adjustments in SAHH function can be expected to differ under different physiological states in different species. SAM-dependent trans-methylation reactions occur in a multitude of subcellular compartments where SAH must be efficiently metabolized to maintain MT activities [4]. Functional characterization of A. thaliana mutants has demonstrated that loss of SAHH function can result in global inhibition of MT activities because of accumulation of SAH [37]. Changes in the sub-cellular localization of SAHH could also significantly affect the efficiency of specific trans-methylation reactions [18,38,39]. Associated with this, SAHH can translocate from the cytoplasm into the nucleus [18] and is also dynamically distributed in other sub-cellular compartments, including vesicular structures, reticulate constructions and the plasma membrane, but not chloroplasts or mitochondria (Fig 2).

One of the key functions of SAHH is to maintain appropriate patterns of DNA and histone methylation in the nucleus [6,38]. The nuclear localization of SAHH was recently attributed to a 41-amino-acid segment (Gly150-Lys190), which is a prerequisite for nuclear targeting of A. thaliana SAHH1 [18]. Intriguingly, the surface-exposed segment does not act as an autonomous nuclear localization signal per se, but may rather serve as an interaction domain for associations with other proteins that can direct SAHH1 into the nucleus. In line with this idea, it was proposed that physical interactions between SAHH and MTs could provide a means for targeting SAHH to appropriate subcellular compartments in order to ensure uninterrupted trans-methylation [18].

While SAHH1 has not been localized into the chloroplast (Fig 2) [18], we detected SAHH1 as a ring in the immediate vicinity around the photosynthetic organelles (Fig 2), presumably to facilitate efficient removal of SAH upon export by SAM transporters that exchange SAH for SAM synthesized in the cytoplasm [40,41]. We also found that SAHH1 can dynamically move along cytosolic strands (S1 Video), but the possible mechanisms underlying such sub-cellular movements remain to be established. Besides protein interactions with MTs, physical contact with components of the cytoskeleton or enzymatic protein complexes may direct SAHH1 to appropriate sub-cellular localizations.

SAHH isoforms can form oligomeric complexes and undergo dynamic interactions with various endogenous and exogenous proteins [2,42,43]. SAHH has been shown to physically interact with various methyltransferases, including indole glucosinolate methyltransferases [17], mRNA cap methyl-transferase [18], and caffeoyl CoA methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) [39], presumably to ensure efficient trans-methylation reactions at accurate sub-cellular sites. These interactions are likely largely determined by the availability of MTs, which appear to be transcriptionally highly responsive to endogenous and exogenous cues (Fig 1). Yang et al. [39] proposed that in vivo interactions between A. thaliana CCoAOMT7, SAHH1/SAHH2, and SAMS form a complex for SAM synthesis to enhance the formation of ferulate in the cell wall. Interactions between SAHH isoforms and other proteins may also be affected by different combinations of post-translational modifications.

Based on crystallographic studies and studies on recombinant, non-post-translationally modified enzyme, plant SAHH was proposed to be active as a dimer [14,15]. However, our data provides evidence suggesting that in A. thaliana SAHH isoforms could be predominantly present in a tetramer. This was evidenced by treatment of leaf extracts with a low concentration of SDS, which did not affect the presence of SAHH complex 4 on CN gels (Fig 3A), but abolished co-migration of potential complex-forming proteins when assessed by 2D SDS-PAGE (Fig 3B). The subunit composition and physiological significance of the abundant protein complex detected by anti-SAHH antibody in various land plants, including the moss P. patens (Fig 4C), remains to be established. Likewise, the subunit composition of the other complexes detected by the anti-SAHH antibody remains to be uncovered. Moreover, besides formation of biochemically rather stable oligomeric complexes, SAHH is likely to undergo transient interactions that cannot be trapped by biochemical separation of protein complexes.

SAHH is an evolutionary conserved enzyme governed by multilevel post-translational control

The metabolic centrality of SAHH is reflected by its evolutionary conservation and the high number of PTMs, including phosphorylation, S-nitrosylation, acetylation and ubiquitination, which have been experimentally verified to occur on A. thaliana SAHH isoforms [17,31–36]. Conservation of the PTM sites between P. patens, a brypohyte, and angiosperms (Fig 4A) points to multilevel post-translational regulation that can facilitate delicate metabolic responses to environmental cues. The up-stream regulatory enzymes, such as the protein kinases and protein phosphatases, N-acetyl transferases and ubiquitin ligases, however, remain almost completely unidentified. Hints to phosphoregulation of SAHH were provided by Trotta et al. and Rahikainen et al. [17,22], who provided evidence that a protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit PP2A-B′γ controls SAHH complex formation and the associated trans-methylation capacity of leaf cells. Two of the phosphorylated residues on A. thaliana SAHH1, S203 and S236, reside on conserved amino acids in the active center of the enzyme [15], and phosphorylation at these sites could therefore affect the activation state of the enzyme. The phosphorylated residues S20 and T44 of SAHH1 in turn reside on the surface of the enzyme [15], and changes in phosphorylation of these sites could impact its protein interactions and/or sub-cellular localization.

Whether and how the different functional aspects of SAHH respond to environmental signals in different plant species is a key question to be resolved to understand metabolic regulation in plants. Here, we explored how the biochemical characteristics of SAHH become adjusted in response to light stress, which is an important environmental factor that poses a risk of metabolic imbalance and triggers protective responses to avoid photo-oxidative damage [44–49]. Light-stress-induced metabolic adjustments beyond photosynthetic carbon metabolism have so-far remained poorly understood. Recently, Zhao et al. [50] demonstrated that a conserved signaling mechanism, where a chloroplast retrograde signal interacts with hormonal signaling to drive stomatal closure, is operational in angiosperms, mosses and ferns. Our findings suggest that high-light-induced signals may be reflected by regulatory adjustments in SAHH at the level of complex formation and phosphorylation in P. patens and A. thaliana (Fig 5).

Taken together, cellular trans-methylation reactions are largely determined by the abundance of substrate-specific MTs that require the activated methyl cycle to retain their activity. Among AMC enzymes, the functionality of SAHH may be controlled at the level of sub-cellular localization, complex formation and post-translational modifications, which can modulate the activity and interactions between SAHH and other proteins. Jointly, these regulatory actions determine which MTs get to interact with SAHH, thereby maintaining their activity. Hence, SAHH can be considered a key determinant of trans-methylation reactions in living cells.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of reviewed Arabidopsis thaliana O-methyltransferases retrieved from UniProt and AMC enzymes used as input for GENESTIGATOR analysis.

Clusters according to the performed hierarchical cluster analysis, protein accession, entry and protein name are indicated. Activated methyl cycle enzymes (AMC) are marked in blue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Settings used in confocal microscopy analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Lists of proteins identified from the main SAHH-containing protein spot on 2D CN-PAGE of Arabidopsis thaliana and Spinacia oleracea leaf extracts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s003

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. Control experiments for sub-cellular localization of Arabidopsis thaliana SAHH1.

A) Confocal microscopy image obtained from A. thaliana wild type plant using microscopy settings for GFP imaging. The leaf was excited at 488 nm and fluorescence was detected at 493 to 598 nm wave length. Chlorophyll fluorescence was excited at 633 nm and detected at 647 to 721 nm wave length. The red color indicates chlorophyll autofluorescence. B) Immunoblots depicting EGFP-SAHH1 in A. thaliana wild type (WT) and a transgenic line stably expressing SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1. Proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE, and EGFP-SAHH1 was immunodetected with an anti-YFP antibody and SAHH was detected with an anti-SAHH antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s004

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Immunoblot depicting SAHH protein complexes after treatment of Arabidopsis thaliana foliar leaf extracts with SDS and/or DTT.

For combined treatments with SDS and DTT, the leaf extract was incubated in the presence of one chemical for 30 minutes, followed by addition of the other for 30 minutes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s005

(PDF)

S3 Fig. 2D-approach depicting SAHH protein complexes from Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (WT) and Spinacia oleracea.

Protein complexes were separated CN-PAGE followed by 12% SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. A) Predominant protein spots as detected by immunoblot analysis using α-SAHH antibody. B) Total protein detection by SYPRO. The spots indicated as “SAHH” in A. thaliana and S. oleracea samples were excised from the gel and the presence of SAHH was confirmed by mass spectrometry as indicated in S3 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s006

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Biological replicates for the study of light-stress-induced adjustments in SAHH presented in Fig 5.

A. thaliana was grown under 130 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 for 16 days and thereafter shifted 800 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 for 2 days. P. patens was grown under 45 μmol photons m^-2 sec^-1 for 13 days and thereafter illuminated under 500 μmol photons m^-2 s^-1 for two days. The gel lanes indicated by asterisks were used to construct Fig 5. A) Oligomeric protein complexes as detected by anti-SAHH antibody and clear native (CN)-PAGE from three independent experiments. The upper panels depict immunoblots with a shorter exposure time required for visualization and quantification of the abundant SAHH complex 4. B) SAHH protein phosphorylation as detected by anti-SAHH antibody and Phostag-PAGE in A. thaliana and P. patens in growth light (GL) and after 2-day illumination under high light (2dHL). C) SAHH protein abundance as detected by anti-SAHH antibody and SDS-PAGE in A. thaliana and P. patens in growth light (GL) and after 2-day illumination under high light (2dHL).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s007

(PDF)

S1 Video. Dynamic movements of SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1 in Arabidopsis thaliana cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s008

(AVI)

S2 Video. Control video composed by confocal microscopy imaging of Arabidopsis thaliana wild type plant using microscopy settings for GFP imaging.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s009

(AVI)

S1 Raw images.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227466.s010

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Marianna Alaviuhkola for excellent assistance in microscopy and Dr. Caterina Gerotto for providing Pyscomitrella patens material. The confocal imaging was performed with microscopes of the Cell Imaging and Cytometry Core at the Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University. Proteomic mass spectrometry analysis were carried out at the Turku Proteomics Facility, Turku Bioscience, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University. The facility is supported by Biocenter Finland.

References

1. Moffatt B, Weretilnyk E. Sustaining S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferase activity in plant cells. Physiol Plant. 2001;113(4):435–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Rahikainen M, Alegre S, Trotta A, Pascual J, Kangasjärvi S. Trans-methylation reactions in plants: focus on the activated methyl cycle. Physiol Plant. 2018;162(2):162–76. pmid:28815615
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Richards HH, Chiang PK, Cantoni GL. Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase: Crystalizationof the purified enzyme and its properties. J Biol Chem. 1978; 253:4476–4480. pmid:659427
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Poulton JE. Transmethylation and Demethylation Reactions in the Metabolism of Secondary Plant Products. In: Secondary Plant Products. Academic Press; 1981 p. 667–723.
5. Cantoni GL, Scarano E. The formation of s-adenosylhomocysteine in enzymatic transmethylation reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 1954;76(18):4744.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Rocha PSCF, Sheikh M, Melchiorre R, Fagard M, Boutet S, Loach R, et al. The arabidopsis HOMOLOGY-DEPENDENT GENE SILENCING1 gene codes for an S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase required for DNA methylation-dependent gene silencing. Plant Cell. 2005;17(2):404–17. pmid:15659630
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Pereira LAR, Todorova M, Cai X, Makaroff CA, Emery RJN, Moffatt BA. Methyl recycling activities are co-ordinately regulated during plant development. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(5):1083–98. pmid:17272833
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Li CH, Yu N, Jiang SM, Shangguan XX, Wang LJ, Chen XY. Down-regulation of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase reveals a role of cytokinin in promoting transmethylation reactions. Planta. 2008;228(1):125–36. pmid:18350315
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Barić I, Fumić K, Glenn B, Ćuk M, Schulze A, Finkelstein JD, et al. S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency in a human: A genetic disorder of methionine metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(12):4234–9. pmid:15024124
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Barić I, Ćuk M, Fumić K, Vugrek O, Allen RH, Glenn B, et al. S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency: A second patient, the younger brother of the index patient, and outcomes during therapy. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28(6):885–902. pmid:16435181
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Wu X, Li F, Kolenovsky A, Caplan A, Cui Y, Cutler A, et al. A mutant deficient in S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in Arabidopsis shows defects in roothair development. Botany. 2009;87(6):571–84.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Kusakabe Y, Ishihara M, Umeda T, Kuroda D, Nakanishi M, Kitade Y, et al. Structural insights into the reaction mechanism of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–16.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Turner MA, Yuan C, Borchardt RT, Hershfield MS, Smith GD, Howell PL. Structure determination of selenomethionyl S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase using data at a single wavelength. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5(5):369–76. pmid:9586999
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Brzezinski K, Bujacz G, Jaskolski M. Purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic studies of plant S -adenosyl- L -homocysteine hydrolase (Lupinus luteus). Acta Crystallogr. 2008;64:671–3.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Brzezinski K, Dauter Z, Jaskolski M. High-resolution structures of complexes of plant S -adenosyl- L -homocysteine hydrolase (Lupinus luteus). Acta Crystallogr. 2012;D68:218–31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Matuszewska B, Borchardt RT, Muto N, Tsujino M, Sudate Y, Hayashi M, et al. The Mechanism of Inhibition of Alcaligenes faecalis Hydrolase by Neplanocin A. 1987;256(1):50–5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Rahikainen M, Trotta A, Alegre S, Pascual J, Vuorinen K, Overmyer K, et al. PP2A-B’γ modulates foliar trans-methylation capacity and the formation of 4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl glucosinolate in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J. 2017;89(1):112–27. pmid:27598402
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Lee S, Doxey AC, Mcconkey BJ, Moffatt BA. Nuclear Targeting of Methyl-Recycling Enzymes in Arabidopsis thaliana Is Mediated by Specific Protein Interactions. Mol Plant. 2012;5(1):231–48. pmid:21976714
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Gerotto C, Trotta A, Bajwa AA, Mancini I, Morosinotto T, Aro EM. Thylakoid protein phosphorylation dynamics in a moss mutant lacking SERINE/THREONINE PROTEIN KINASE STN8. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(3):1582–97. pmid:31061101
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Hruz T, Laule O, Szabo G, Wessendorp F, Bleuler S, Oertle L, et al. Genevestigator V3: A Reference Expression Database for the Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomes. Adv Bioinformatics 2008;2008:1–5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0. 12. 2019.
22. Trotta A, Wrzaczek M, Scharte J, Tikkanen M, Konert G, Rahikainen M, et al. Regulatory subunit B’gamma of protein phosphatase 2A prevents unnecessary defense reactions under low light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(3):1464–80. pmid:21571669
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Li S, Mhamdi A, Trotta A, Kangasjärvi S, Noctor G. The protein phosphatase subunit PP2A-B’γ is required to suppress day length-dependent pathogenesis responses triggered by intracellular oxidative stress. New Phytol. 2014;202(1):145–60. pmid:24299221
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Lehtimäki N, Koskela MM, Dahlström KM, Pakula E, Lintala M, Scholz M, et al. Posttranslational modifications of FERREDOXIN-NADP+ OXIDOREDUCTASE in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(4):1764–76. pmid:25301888
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carrera I, Frise E, Verena K, Mark L, Tobias P, et al. Fiji—an Open platform for biological image analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;9(7).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. R Core T. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2018; https://www.R-project.org
27. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(22):4673–80. pmid:7984417
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25. pmid:3447015
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Slaymaker DH, Navarre DA, Clark D, Del Pozo O, Martin GB, Klessig DF. The tobacco salicylic acid-binding protein 3 (SABP3) is the chloroplast carbonic anhydrase, which exhibits antioxidant activity and plays a role in the hypersensitive defense response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(18):11640–5. pmid:12185253
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Medina-Puche L, Castelló MJ, Canet JV, Lamilla J, Colombo ML, Tornero P. β- carbonic anhydrases play a role in salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2017 12(7):e0181820. pmid:28753666
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Xu SL, Chalkley RJ, Maynard JC, Wang W, Ni W, Jiang X, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals O-GlcNAc modification on proteins with key regulatory functions in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(8):E1536–43. pmid:28154133
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Roitinger E, Hofer M, Ko T, Pichler P, Novatchkova M, Yang J, et al. Quantitative Phosphoproteomics of the Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated (ATM) and Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) Dependent DNA Damage Response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell proteomics. 2015;556–71. pmid:25561503
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Wang X, Bian Y, Cheng K, Gu L, Ye M, Zou H, et al. A large-scale protein phosphorylation analysis reveals novel phosphorylation motifs and phosphoregulatory networks in Arabidopsis. J Proteomics 2013;78:486–98. pmid:23111157
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Fares A, Rossignol M, Peltier J. Proteomics investigation of endogenous S -nitrosylation in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;416(3–4):331–6. pmid:22115780
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Puyaubert J, Fares A, Rézé N, Peltier J, Baudouin E. Identification of endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis plantlets : Effect of cold stress on cysteine nitrosylation level. Plant Sci. 2014;215–216:150–6. pmid:24388526
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Walton A, Stes E, Cybulski N, Bel M, Iñigo S, Durand AN, et al. It’s time for some “site”-seeing: Novel tools to monitor the ubiquitin landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2016;28(1):6–16. pmid:26744219
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Jordan ND, West JP, Bottley A, Sheikh M, Furner I. Transcript profiling of the hypomethylated hog1 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65(5):571–86. pmid:17786563
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Baubec T, Dinh HQ, Pecinka A, Rakic B, Rozhon W, Wohlrab B, et al. Cooperation of multiple chromatin modifications can generate unanticipated stability of epigenetic states in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22(1):34–47. pmid:20097869
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Yang SX, Wu TT, Ding CH, Zhou PC, Chen ZZ, Gou JY. SAHH and SAMS form a methyl donor complex with CCoAOMT7 for methylation of phenolic compounds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;520(1):122–7. pmid:31582217
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Ravanel S, Block MA, Rippert P, Jabrin S, Curien G, Rébeillé F, et al. Methionine metabolism in plants: Chloroplasts are autonomous for de novo methionine synthesis and can import S-adenosylmethionine from the cytosol. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(21):22548–57. pmid:15024005
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Bouvier F, Linka N, Isner JC, Mutterer J, Weber APM, Camara B. Arabidopsis SAMT1 defines a plastid transporter regulating plastid biogenesis and plant development. Plant Cell. 2006;18(11):3088–105. pmid:17098813
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Mäkinen K, De S. The significance of methionine cycle enzymes in plant virus infections. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019;50:67–75. pmid:30959442
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Ivanov KI, Eskelin K, Bašic M, De S, Lõhmus A, Varjosalo M, et al. Molecular insights into the function of the viral RNA silencing suppressor HCPro. Plant J. 2016 Jan 1;85(1):30–45. pmid:26611351
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Aro EM, Virgin I, Andersson B. Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. BBA—Bioenerg. 1993;1143(2):113–34.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Foyer CH. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative signaling and the regulation of photosynthesis. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;154:134–42. pmid:30283160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Pascual J, Rahikainen M, Kangasjärvi S. Plant Light Stress. eLS. 2017;1–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Alboresia A, Gerottob C, Giacomettib GM, Bassia R, Morosinotto T. Physcomitrella patens mutants affected on heat dissipation clarify the evolution of photoprotection mechanisms upon land colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(24):11128–33. pmid:20505121
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Kleine T, Leister D. Retrograde signaling: Organelles go networking. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenerg. 2016;1857(8):1313–25.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Chan KX, Phua SY, Crisp P, McQuinn R, Pogson BJ. Learning the Languages of the Chloroplast: Retrograde Signaling and Beyond. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016;67(1):25–53.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Zhao C, Wang Y, Chan KX, Marchant DB, Franks PJ, Randall D, et al. Evolution of chloroplast retrograde signaling facilitates green plant adaptation to land. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA 2019;116(11):5015–20. pmid:30804180
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Moffatt B, Weretilnyk E. Sustaining S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferase activity in plant cells. Physiol Plant. 2001;113(4):435–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Rahikainen M, Alegre S, Trotta A, Pascual J, Kangasjärvi S. Trans-methylation reactions in plants: focus on the activated methyl cycle. Physiol Plant. 2018;162(2):162–76. pmid:28815615
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Richards HH, Chiang PK, Cantoni GL. Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase: Crystalizationof the purified enzyme and its properties. J Biol Chem. 1978; 253:4476–4480. pmid:659427
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Poulton JE. Transmethylation and Demethylation Reactions in the Metabolism of Secondary Plant Products. In: Secondary Plant Products. Academic Press; 1981 p. 667–723.

[ref5] 5. Cantoni GL, Scarano E. The formation of s-adenosylhomocysteine in enzymatic transmethylation reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 1954;76(18):4744.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Rocha PSCF, Sheikh M, Melchiorre R, Fagard M, Boutet S, Loach R, et al. The arabidopsis HOMOLOGY-DEPENDENT GENE SILENCING1 gene codes for an S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase required for DNA methylation-dependent gene silencing. Plant Cell. 2005;17(2):404–17. pmid:15659630
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Pereira LAR, Todorova M, Cai X, Makaroff CA, Emery RJN, Moffatt BA. Methyl recycling activities are co-ordinately regulated during plant development. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(5):1083–98. pmid:17272833
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Li CH, Yu N, Jiang SM, Shangguan XX, Wang LJ, Chen XY. Down-regulation of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase reveals a role of cytokinin in promoting transmethylation reactions. Planta. 2008;228(1):125–36. pmid:18350315
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Barić I, Fumić K, Glenn B, Ćuk M, Schulze A, Finkelstein JD, et al. S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency in a human: A genetic disorder of methionine metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(12):4234–9. pmid:15024124
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Barić I, Ćuk M, Fumić K, Vugrek O, Allen RH, Glenn B, et al. S-Adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase deficiency: A second patient, the younger brother of the index patient, and outcomes during therapy. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28(6):885–902. pmid:16435181
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Wu X, Li F, Kolenovsky A, Caplan A, Cui Y, Cutler A, et al. A mutant deficient in S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in Arabidopsis shows defects in roothair development. Botany. 2009;87(6):571–84.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Kusakabe Y, Ishihara M, Umeda T, Kuroda D, Nakanishi M, Kitade Y, et al. Structural insights into the reaction mechanism of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–16.
View Article
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Turner MA, Yuan C, Borchardt RT, Hershfield MS, Smith GD, Howell PL. Structure determination of selenomethionyl S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase using data at a single wavelength. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5(5):369–76. pmid:9586999
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Brzezinski K, Bujacz G, Jaskolski M. Purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic studies of plant S -adenosyl- L -homocysteine hydrolase (Lupinus luteus). Acta Crystallogr. 2008;64:671–3.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Brzezinski K, Dauter Z, Jaskolski M. High-resolution structures of complexes of plant S -adenosyl- L -homocysteine hydrolase (Lupinus luteus). Acta Crystallogr. 2012;D68:218–31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Matuszewska B, Borchardt RT, Muto N, Tsujino M, Sudate Y, Hayashi M, et al. The Mechanism of Inhibition of Alcaligenes faecalis Hydrolase by Neplanocin A. 1987;256(1):50–5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Rahikainen M, Trotta A, Alegre S, Pascual J, Vuorinen K, Overmyer K, et al. PP2A-B’γ modulates foliar trans-methylation capacity and the formation of 4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl glucosinolate in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J. 2017;89(1):112–27. pmid:27598402
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Lee S, Doxey AC, Mcconkey BJ, Moffatt BA. Nuclear Targeting of Methyl-Recycling Enzymes in Arabidopsis thaliana Is Mediated by Specific Protein Interactions. Mol Plant. 2012;5(1):231–48. pmid:21976714
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Gerotto C, Trotta A, Bajwa AA, Mancini I, Morosinotto T, Aro EM. Thylakoid protein phosphorylation dynamics in a moss mutant lacking SERINE/THREONINE PROTEIN KINASE STN8. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(3):1582–97. pmid:31061101
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Hruz T, Laule O, Szabo G, Wessendorp F, Bleuler S, Oertle L, et al. Genevestigator V3: A Reference Expression Database for the Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomes. Adv Bioinformatics 2008;2008:1–5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0. 12. 2019.

[ref22] 22. Trotta A, Wrzaczek M, Scharte J, Tikkanen M, Konert G, Rahikainen M, et al. Regulatory subunit B’gamma of protein phosphatase 2A prevents unnecessary defense reactions under low light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(3):1464–80. pmid:21571669
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] PubMed/NCBI

[74] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Li S, Mhamdi A, Trotta A, Kangasjärvi S, Noctor G. The protein phosphatase subunit PP2A-B’γ is required to suppress day length-dependent pathogenesis responses triggered by intracellular oxidative stress. New Phytol. 2014;202(1):145–60. pmid:24299221
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lehtimäki N, Koskela MM, Dahlström KM, Pakula E, Lintala M, Scholz M, et al. Posttranslational modifications of FERREDOXIN-NADP+ OXIDOREDUCTASE in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(4):1764–76. pmid:25301888
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carrera I, Frise E, Verena K, Mark L, Tobias P, et al. Fiji—an Open platform for biological image analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;9(7).
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. R Core T. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2018; https://www.R-project.org

[ref27] 27. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(22):4673–80. pmid:7984417
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25. pmid:3447015
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Slaymaker DH, Navarre DA, Clark D, Del Pozo O, Martin GB, Klessig DF. The tobacco salicylic acid-binding protein 3 (SABP3) is the chloroplast carbonic anhydrase, which exhibits antioxidant activity and plays a role in the hypersensitive defense response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(18):11640–5. pmid:12185253
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Medina-Puche L, Castelló MJ, Canet JV, Lamilla J, Colombo ML, Tornero P. β- carbonic anhydrases play a role in salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2017 12(7):e0181820. pmid:28753666
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Xu SL, Chalkley RJ, Maynard JC, Wang W, Ni W, Jiang X, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals O-GlcNAc modification on proteins with key regulatory functions in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114(8):E1536–43. pmid:28154133
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Roitinger E, Hofer M, Ko T, Pichler P, Novatchkova M, Yang J, et al. Quantitative Phosphoproteomics of the Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated (ATM) and Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) Dependent DNA Damage Response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell proteomics. 2015;556–71. pmid:25561503
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Wang X, Bian Y, Cheng K, Gu L, Ye M, Zou H, et al. A large-scale protein phosphorylation analysis reveals novel phosphorylation motifs and phosphoregulatory networks in Arabidopsis. J Proteomics 2013;78:486–98. pmid:23111157
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Fares A, Rossignol M, Peltier J. Proteomics investigation of endogenous S -nitrosylation in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;416(3–4):331–6. pmid:22115780
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Puyaubert J, Fares A, Rézé N, Peltier J, Baudouin E. Identification of endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis plantlets : Effect of cold stress on cysteine nitrosylation level. Plant Sci. 2014;215–216:150–6. pmid:24388526
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Walton A, Stes E, Cybulski N, Bel M, Iñigo S, Durand AN, et al. It’s time for some “site”-seeing: Novel tools to monitor the ubiquitin landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2016;28(1):6–16. pmid:26744219
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Jordan ND, West JP, Bottley A, Sheikh M, Furner I. Transcript profiling of the hypomethylated hog1 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65(5):571–86. pmid:17786563
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Baubec T, Dinh HQ, Pecinka A, Rakic B, Rozhon W, Wohlrab B, et al. Cooperation of multiple chromatin modifications can generate unanticipated stability of epigenetic states in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22(1):34–47. pmid:20097869
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Yang SX, Wu TT, Ding CH, Zhou PC, Chen ZZ, Gou JY. SAHH and SAMS form a methyl donor complex with CCoAOMT7 for methylation of phenolic compounds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;520(1):122–7. pmid:31582217
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Ravanel S, Block MA, Rippert P, Jabrin S, Curien G, Rébeillé F, et al. Methionine metabolism in plants: Chloroplasts are autonomous for de novo methionine synthesis and can import S-adenosylmethionine from the cytosol. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(21):22548–57. pmid:15024005
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Bouvier F, Linka N, Isner JC, Mutterer J, Weber APM, Camara B. Arabidopsis SAMT1 defines a plastid transporter regulating plastid biogenesis and plant development. Plant Cell. 2006;18(11):3088–105. pmid:17098813
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Mäkinen K, De S. The significance of methionine cycle enzymes in plant virus infections. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019;50:67–75. pmid:30959442
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Ivanov KI, Eskelin K, Bašic M, De S, Lõhmus A, Varjosalo M, et al. Molecular insights into the function of the viral RNA silencing suppressor HCPro. Plant J. 2016 Jan 1;85(1):30–45. pmid:26611351
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Aro EM, Virgin I, Andersson B. Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. BBA—Bioenerg. 1993;1143(2):113–34.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Foyer CH. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative signaling and the regulation of photosynthesis. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;154:134–42. pmid:30283160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Pascual J, Rahikainen M, Kangasjärvi S. Plant Light Stress. eLS. 2017;1–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Alboresia A, Gerottob C, Giacomettib GM, Bassia R, Morosinotto T. Physcomitrella patens mutants affected on heat dissipation clarify the evolution of photoprotection mechanisms upon land colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(24):11128–33. pmid:20505121
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Kleine T, Leister D. Retrograde signaling: Organelles go networking. Biochim Biophys Acta—Bioenerg. 2016;1857(8):1313–25.
View Article
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Chan KX, Phua SY, Crisp P, McQuinn R, Pogson BJ. Learning the Languages of the Chloroplast: Retrograde Signaling and Beyond. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016;67(1):25–53.
View Article
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Zhao C, Wang Y, Chan KX, Marchant DB, Franks PJ, Randall D, et al. Evolution of chloroplast retrograde signaling facilitates green plant adaptation to land. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA 2019;116(11):5015–20. pmid:30804180
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Plant material

Analysis of publicly available transcript profiles

Confocal microscopy

Isolation of protein extracts and biochemical analysis of SAHH

Amino acid alignment and construction of phylogeny tree

Results

Dynamics of O-MT mRNA abundance in A. thaliana

Sub-cellular localization of SAHH1 in A. thaliana leaves

Assessment of A. thaliana SAHH by 2D gel electrophoresis

Evolutionary conservation of SAHH in land plants

Light-induced adjustments of SAHH in A. thaliana and P. patens

Discussion

SAHH is required to maintain trans-methylation reactions in different cellular compartments

SAHH is an evolutionary conserved enzyme governed by multilevel post-translational control

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of reviewed Arabidopsis thaliana O-methyltransferases retrieved from UniProt and AMC enzymes used as input for GENESTIGATOR analysis.

S2 Table. Settings used in confocal microscopy analysis.

S3 Table. Lists of proteins identified from the main SAHH-containing protein spot on 2D CN-PAGE of Arabidopsis thaliana and Spinacia oleracea leaf extracts.

S1 Fig. Control experiments for sub-cellular localization of Arabidopsis thaliana SAHH1.

S2 Fig. Immunoblot depicting SAHH protein complexes after treatment of Arabidopsis thaliana foliar leaf extracts with SDS and/or DTT.

S3 Fig. 2D-approach depicting SAHH protein complexes from Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (WT) and Spinacia oleracea.

S4 Fig. Biological replicates for the study of light-stress-induced adjustments in SAHH presented in Fig 5.

S1 Video. Dynamic movements of SAHH1p::EGFP-SAHH1 in Arabidopsis thaliana cells.

S2 Video. Control video composed by confocal microscopy imaging of Arabidopsis thaliana wild type plant using microscopy settings for GFP imaging.

S1 Raw images.

Acknowledgments

References