Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Decrypting the environmental sources of Mycobacterium canettii by high-throughput biochemical profiling

  • Ahmed Loukil ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Ahmed Loukil, Fériel Bouzid

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Aix-Marseille Univ., IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée-Infection, Marseille, France

  • Fériel Bouzid ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Ahmed Loukil, Fériel Bouzid

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Aix-Marseille Univ., IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée-Infection, Marseille, France, Université de Gafsa, Faculté des Sciences de Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia

  • Djaltou Aboubaker Osman,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Institut de Recherche Médicinale, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche de Djibouti (CERD), Djibouti, République de Djibouti

  • Michel Drancourt

    Roles Writing – original draft

    michel.drancourt@univ-amu.fr

    Affiliations Aix-Marseille Univ., IRD, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée-Infection, Marseille, France, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France

Abstract

Mycobacterium canettii is a smooth bacillus related to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. It causes lymph nodes and pulmonary tuberculosis in patients living in countries of the Horn of Africa, including Djibouti. The environmental reservoirs of M. canettii are still unknown. We aimed to further decrypt these potential reservoirs by using an original approach of High-Throughput Carbon and Azote Substrate Profiling. The Biolog Phenotype profiling was performed on six clinical strains of M. canettii and one M. tuberculosis strain was used as a positive control. The experiments were duplicated and authenticated by negative controls. While M. tuberculosis metabolized 22/190 (11%) carbon substrates and 3/95 (3%) nitrogen substrates, 17/190 (8.9%) carbon substrates and three nitrogen substrates were metabolized by the six M. canettii strains forming the so-called corebiologome. A total at 16 carbon substrates and three nitrogen substrates were metabolized in common by M. tuberculosis and the six M. canettii strains. Moreover, at least one M. canettii strain metabolized 36/190 (19%) carbon substrates and 3/95 (3%) nitrogen substrates for a total of 39/285 (13%) substrates. Classifying these carbon and nitrogen substrates into ten potential environmental sources (plants, fruits and vegetables, bacteria, algae, fungi, nematodes, mollusks, mammals, insects and inanimate environment) significantly associated carbon and nitrogen substrates metabolized by at least one M. canettii strain with plants (p = 0.006). These results suggest that some plants endemic in the Horn of Africa may serve as ecological niches for M. canettii. Further ethnobotanical studies will indicate plant usages by local populations, then guiding field microbiological investigations in order to prove the definite environmental reservoirs of this opportunistic tuberculous pathogen.

Introduction

Mycobacterium canettii is a smooth tubercle bacillus isolated by G. Canetti in 1969 and belonging to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex [1]. About one hundred cases only have been reported in the literature, and most of these patients have been infected in the Horn of Africa and particularly in Djibouti [2, 3]. Recently, we confirmed that M. canettii was still circulating in the Horn of Africa by isolating M. canettii strains from patients presenting with pulmonary tuberculosis in Djibouti [4]. Initial molecular analysis of a large collection of M. canettii isolates revealed a high genetic diversity with traces of intraspecies horizontal gene transfer [5]. Moreover, whole genome sequencing analysis of five representative isolates showed that M. canettii was the M. tuberculosis complex species most closely related to the last common progenitor of this complex [6].

M. canettii is acknowledged as a M. tuberculosis complex species with an environmental reservoir, and this hypothesis is mainly based on the observation of the absence of human-to-human transmission [7]. However, the putative environmental sources of infection and reservoirs remain completely elusive [3, 7]. A mouse model using an oral route for M. canettii inoculation has demonstrated the potential of ingested M. canettii bacilli to relocate to lungs and other organs [8]. This experimental data supported that people could get infected with environmental M. canettii by ingesting M. canettii-contaminated drinks or foodstuffs.

In a previous study, we used the Biolog Phenotype profiling (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA) to characterize the metabolic profile of another environmental, non-tuberculous mycobacterium, Mycobacterium ulcerans [9]. In that study, we defined M. ulcerans sole-carbon-source utilization profile and we found this approach particularly conclusive for the quest of environmental sources of M. ulcerans. Therefore, we embarked in using high-throughput carbon and nitrogen substrate profiling of M. canettii to help in the quest of its potential sources and reservoirs.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

M. canettii CIP 140010059T, M. canettii DJ480, M. canettii DJ734, M. canettii DJ514, M. canettii DJ517 and M. canettii DJ613 were isolated from clinical sources in Djibouti in 2016 [4] and M. tuberculosis Beijing family was used as a positive control [10]. They were grown at 37°C in Middlebrook 7H10 agar medium (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) (Becton Dickinson) and 0.5% glycerol in a biosafety level 3 laboratory.

Biolog phenotype profiling

The Biolog Phenotype profiling (Biolog Inc.) was performed using PM1, PM2A and PM3B biolog 96-well microplates giving 190 carbon sources and 95 nitrogen sources, as previously described [911]. All experiments were conducted in duplicate using two independent plates during the same day for each strain. For each mycobacterial strain, colonies were removed from the Middlebrook 7H10 agar plate using a sterile swab already dipped in 0.1% Tween 80 solution, then rubbed and grinded against the wall of a dry glass tube. Colonies were starved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 24 hours at 25°C in order to minimize the background in the control well without substrate sources and to prevent color development in wells with substrate sources. A suspension made in the inoculating fluid IF-0a GN/GP (Biolog Inc.) was vigorously vortexed in the presence of glass beads to declump mycobacterial cells to obtain a uniform suspension. The turbidity of the suspension was adjusted to 81% transmittance. The PM-additive solutions for each plate were made according to the manufacturer's instructions (Table 1). A mixture solution specific for each plate was prepared by mixing 1.76 mL of the mycobacterial suspension with 22.24 mL of specific inoculating fluid (Table 2) for PM1 and PM2A plates. Then, 3.52 mL of cell suspension was mixed with 44.48 mL of inoculating fluid for the PM3B plate (Table 2). Finally, the PM plates were inoculated with 100 μL of the specific mixture solution and incubated in the OmniLog (Biolog, Inc.) system at 37°C for seven days [10]. The principle of this system is based on a redox reaction from which mycobacteria reduce a tetrazolium dye to a purple color substrate. The variable level of purple color depends upon the conditions in each PM well and indicates the metabolically active state in some wells but not others. Using the OmniLog PM Software, the color change was read and recorded every 15 minutes giving a dye reduction value. The set of values obtained of each well provides kinetic information as Area Under the Curve (AUC). For each PM plate, non-inoculated wells containing only additive solutions were used as negative controls. Then, the reproducibility of the results was assessed using the OmniLog PM Software by superposing the AUCs obtained for the homologous wells of the duplicate. Then, the “mode average” calculated average AUC for the two homologous wells. The AUC of the negative controls were compared to values of positive and negative wells to set up a threshold. Wells were considered as having a moderately positive growth when the AUC of the well was equal to or lower than 1.25 times the AUC of the negative control and a highly positive growth when the AUC of the well was equal to or higher than 1.50 times the AUC value of the negative control [9].

thumbnail
Table 1. Composition and preparation of 12x PM additive solutions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222078.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Recipe for 1x PM inoculating fluids from stock solutions for two plates of PM1, PM2 or PM3 (100 μl / well).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222078.t002

Environmental sources of metabolized substrates

Based on our previously reported study [9], we sorted all the substrates present in the PM1, PM2 and PM3B plates into 10 categories of potential environmental sources including plants, fruits and vegetables, bacteria, algae, fungi, nematodes, mollusks, mammals, insects and inanimate environment. We compared the proportion of each category to substrates metabolized by at least one of the six M. canettii strains versus substrates not metabolized by any of the six M. canettii strains using Chi-square test (R-studio) (https://www.rstudio.com).

Results

Substrates metabolized by M. canettii strains

All the experiments for the six M. canettii strains and M. tuberculosis were duplicated. In addition, negative wells (containing cell-free reagents) presented very low background and flat lines in all the PMs plates consistent with the absence of metabolic activity. For the positive control M. tuberculosis, 22/190 (11%) carbon substrates and 3/95 (3%) nitrogen substrates were metabolized (Table 3). For M. canettii, 17 carbon substrates and three nitrogen substrates were metabolized by the six M. canettii strains under investigation, forming the so-called corebiologome (Table 3). In addition, 36/190 (19%) carbon substrates and 3/95 (3%) nitrogen substrates for a total of 39/285 (13%) substrates here investigated were metabolized by at least one of the six M. canettii strains.

thumbnail
Table 3. Carbone and nitrogen substrates metabolized by six M. canettii strains compared with one M. tuberculosis strain Beijing on Biolog PM1, PM2 and PM3B plates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222078.t003

Comparing M. canettii with M. tuberculosis, 16 carbon substrates and three nitrogen substrates were metabolized in common by M. tuberculosis and the six M.canettii strains (Table 3). Further, the sixteen carbon substrates metabolized by at least 1/6 M. canettii strains and not metabolized by M. tuberculosis included L-rhamnose, D-trehalose, D-mannose, D-fructose-6-phosphate, 2,3-butanediol, D-fucose, D-glucose-6-phosphate, D-serine, glycyl-L-aspartic acid, D-threonine, glycyl-l-glutamic acid, pyruvic acid, acetoacetic acid, mono methylsuccinate, L-pyroglutamic acid and sec-butylamine. No difference was observed for nitrogen substrates. Among these 16 substrates, 2,3-butanediol and L-rhamnose were metabolized by the six M. canettii strains and not by M. tuberculosis.

Environmental sources of metabolized substrates

All the 190 carbon substrates and 95 nitrogen substrates included in the PM1, PM2 and PM3B plates were classified into ten potential environmental sources. In a first step, comparison of these ten categories to carbon substrates metabolized by at least one of the six tested M. canettii strains versus non-metabolized carbon substrates yielded a significant association between M. canettii metabolized carbon sources and plants (p-value = 0.015). Further associations did not reach the 0.05 level of significance, i.e. algae (p = 0.062), mollusks (p = 0.072), insects (p = 0.096), inanimate environment (p = 0.328), fruits and vegetables (p = 0.399), bacteria (p = 0.577), fungi (p = 0.651), mammals (p = 0.7) and nematodes (p = 0.754). In a second step, comparing categories of potential sources to the carbon and nitrogen substrates metabolized or not by at least one M. canettii strain confirmed a significant association with plants (p = 0.006). While the associations with insects (p = 0.051) were marginally significant, the associations with algae (p = 0.072), fungi (p = 0.1525), mollusks (p = 0.355), inanimate environment (p = 0.4165), nematodes (p = 0.5072), fruits and vegetables (p = 0.5176), bacteria (p = 0.783) and mammals (p = 0.8668) were not statistically significant.

Discussion

We are reporting on the high throughput biochemical profiling of M. canettii using the OmniLog® system (Biolog Inc.). This approach has already been reported for some mycobacteria of medical interest, including M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis and M. bovis BCG [10], as well as for M. ulcerans and Mycobacterium marinum [9]. Also, the environmental Mycobacterium smegmatis has been investigated by using phenotypic PM1, PM3 and PM5 plates to test carbon and nitrogen sources and nutrient supplements [12]. In our study and previously reported studies, data were validated by the negativity of negative controls and the reproducibility of results over two wells per substrate. The protocol used in our study was adapted from the protocol used for studying M. smegmatis [12] whereas extensive modifications in preparing the inoculum for PM plates have been made over a previously reported protocol for studying M. tuberculosis [10]. In this report, the authors chose to investigate a M. tuberculosis Beijing clinical isolate instead of the M. tuberculosis H37Rv investigated by Biolog in a previously reported work [10]. Indeed, M. tuberculosis H37Rv is now cultured for 115 years [13] for approximately more than 50 passages in the authors’ laboratory; with a demonstrated genomic derive [14] that renders these plural M. tuberculosis H37Rv strains unrepresentative of the M. tuberculosis strains causing modern tuberculosis. Therefore, the results we obtained with M. tuberculosis used as a positive control must be tempered due to differences in methodology [10].

We observed that the M. canettii corebiologome (substrates metabolized by all the six M. canettii strains under investigation) was limited to only 17/190 (9%) carbon substrates and 3/95 (3%) nitrogen substrates. Searching for the potential sources common to these substrates highlighted plants as potential sources, but not fruits or vegetables. Our interpretation of these observations is that M. canettii may reside in close association with non-fruit bearing plants. This interpretation is reinforced by evidence for a potential relationship between M. canettii and cellulose, the major constituent of plant cell walls. Indeed, an unexpected conservation of cellulase-encoding genes has been found in the genome of M. canettii including the Cel6 gene, which encodes a fully active cellulase [15].

The unique geographical specificity of M. canettii strains, which, apart from the three initial (lost) strains reported by G. Canetti himself, have all been isolated from patients exposed to one of the regions of the Horn of Africa [3], led us to the hypothesis that M. canettii lives in close association with one or several plants specifically endemic to this part of the world (Table 4). Moreover, populations must be in close contact with these potential plant reservoirs, either by using these plants for tissue preparation, medicinal and recreational activities or feeding. The fact that M. canettii is temperature-sensitive and specifically provokes lymph node infection along the digestive tract of patients [3] furthermore narrows the possibility to alimentary contacts with uncooked or poorly cooked plants [16]. Moreover, in this study, no significant association was found between M. canettii and sources related to aquatic environment (algae and mollusks), confirming that the potential plant reservoirs of M. canettii should be located in the arid environment in the Horn of Africa.

thumbnail
Table 4. List of plants endemic in countries of the Horn of Africa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222078.t004

In this short list of plants, Catha edulis (known as khat) is fulfilling all these criteria as potential source for M. canettii. Khat, cultivated in Ethiopia and Eritrae, is then imported and circulating in Djibouti, Yemen and Somalia. Khat is specifically consumed as a stimulant or as a medicinal plant by local populations including children younger than 10 years in the Horn of Africa [17]. Interestingly, rhamnose, that we found to be one of the two substrates specifically metabolized by M. canettii but not by closely related M. tuberculosis, was detected in the leaves of khat [18].

Conclusions

The original approach combining experimental study with a keyword study has been efficiently used to detect some ecological niches of M. ulcerans, a nontuberculous environmental mycobacterium [9]. Applying the very same methodology to M. canettii was also efficient in the present study, pointing towards some plants as potential ecological niches for this environmental tuberculous mycobacterium. Capitalizing on this new knowledge, further ethnobotanical studies will indicate plant usages by local populations, guiding field microbiological investigations in order to disclose one or several sources of infection for populations. In particular, plants could be screened by using PCR-based methods for the detection of DNA sequences specific for M. canettii, selecting plants to be further cultured. If these investigations confirm any association between M. canettii and khat or other plants, infection with M. canettii should be included in the very short list of phytonoses which are human infections transmitted by plants [42].

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the technical contribution of Muriel Militello, the contribution of Olga Cusack for manuscript editing and Magdalen Lardière for English reviewing.

References

  1. 1. Van Soolingen D, Hoogenboezem T, De Haas PEW, Hermans PWM, Koedam MA, Teppema KS, et al. A Novel Pathogenic Taxon of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex, Canetti: Characterization of an Exceptional Isolate from Africa. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47: 1236–1245. pmid:9336935
  2. 2. Boyer-Cazajous G, Martinaud C, Déhan C, Hassan MO, Gaas Y, Chenilleau-Vidal M-C, et al. High prevalence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Djibouti: a retrospective study. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8. pmid:24518635
  3. 3. Aboubaker Osman D, Bouzid F, Canaan S, Drancourt M. Smooth Tubercle Bacilli: Neglected Opportunistic Tropical Pathogens. Front Public Health. 2016;3. pmid:26793699
  4. 4. Bouzid F, Astier H, Osman DA, Javelle E, Hassan MO, Simon F, et al. Extended spectrum of antibiotic susceptibility for tuberculosis, Djibouti. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51: 235–238. pmid:28711677
  5. 5. Fabre M, Koeck J-L, Le Fleche P, Simon F, Herve V, Vergnaud G, et al. High Genetic Diversity Revealed by Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Genotyping and Analysis of hsp65 Gene Polymorphism in a Large Collection of “Mycobacterium canettii” Strains Indicates that the M. tuberculosis Complex Is a Recently Emerged Clone of “M. canettii.” J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42: 3248–3255. pmid:15243089
  6. 6. Supply P, Marceau M, Mangenot S, Roche D, Rouanet C, Khanna V, et al. Genomic analysis of smooth tubercle bacilli provides insights into ancestry and pathoadaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45: 172–179. pmid:23291586
  7. 7. Koeck J-L, Fabre M, Simon F, Daffé M, Garnotel é., Matan AB, et al. Clinical characteristics of the smooth tubercle bacilli ‘Mycobacterium canettii’ infection suggest the existence of an environmental reservoir. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17: 1013–1019. pmid:20831613
  8. 8. Bouzid F, Brégeon F, Lepidi H, Donoghue HD, Minnikin DE, Drancourt M. Ready Experimental Translocation of Mycobacterium canettii Yields Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Ehrt S, editor. Infect Immun. 2017;85. pmid:28923895
  9. 9. Zingue D, Bouam A, Militello M, Drancourt M. High-Throughput Carbon Substrate Profiling of Mycobacterium ulcerans Suggests Potential Environmental Reservoirs. Small PLC, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005303. pmid:28095422
  10. 10. Khatri B, Fielder M, Jones G, Newell W, Abu-Oun M, Wheeler PR. High Throughput Phenotypic Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis Strains’ Metabolism Using Biolog Phenotype Microarrays. Manganelli R, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e52673. pmid:23326347
  11. 11. Bochner BR. Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33: 191–205. pmid:19054113
  12. 12. Baloni P, Padiadpu J, Singh A, Gupta KR, Chandra N. Identifying feasible metabolic routes in Mycobacterium smegmatis and possible alterations under diverse nutrient conditions. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14. pmid:24467879
  13. 13. Kubica GP, Kim TH, Dunbar FP. Designation of strain H37Rv as the neotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1972;22: 99–106.
  14. 14. Ioerger TR, Feng Y, Ganesula K, Chen X, Dobos KM, Fortune S, et al. Variation among Genome Sequences of H37Rv Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Multiple Laboratories. J Bacteriol. 2010;192: 3645–3653. pmid:20472797
  15. 15. Mba Medie F, Ben Salah I, Drancourt M, Henrissat B. Paradoxical conservation of a set of three cellulose-targeting genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms. Microbiology. 2010;156: 1468–1475. pmid:20150238
  16. 16. Aboubaker Osman D, Garnotel E, Drancourt M. Dry-heat inactivation of “Mycobacterium canettii.” BMC Res Notes. 2017;10.
  17. 17. Kandela P. SANA’A Women’s rights, a tourist boom, and the power of khat in Yemen. The Lancet. 2000;355: 1437.
  18. 18. Gellért M, Szendrei K, Reisch J. Dihydromyricetin 3-O-rhamnoside from leaves of Catha edulis. Phytochemistry. 1981;20: 1759–1760.
  19. 19. Gouvernement de Djibouti. Monographie nationale de la diversité biologique de Djibouti [Internet]. 2000 [cited 19 May 2019]. Available from: http://www.environnement.dj/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Monographie-Nationale-de-la-Diversit%C3%A9-Biologique.pdf
  20. 20. Roskov Y, Kunze T, Paglinawan L, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Culham A, et al. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2013 Annual Checklist [Internet]. Apr 2013 [cited 05 May 2019]. Available from: http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2013/
  21. 21. Audru J, César J, Lebrun J-P. Les plantes vasculaires de la République de Djibouti. Flore illustrée [Internet]. CIRAD-EMVT; 1994. Available from: http://agritrop.cirad.fr/312163/
  22. 22. Dowe JL. A Taxonomic Account of Livistona R.Br. (Arecaceae). 2009; 160.
  23. 23. Govaerts R, Dransfield J. World checklist of palms. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 2005.
  24. 24. Govaerts R. World checklist of selected plant families published update. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 2011.
  25. 25. Govaerts R, Frodin DG, Radcliffe-Smith A, Carter S. World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae (with Pandaceae) [Internet]. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2000. Available from: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300050879
  26. 26. Mccoy T. Aloe djiboutiensis and Aloe ericahenriettae two new species from Djibouti: And the mystery of Aloe eumassawana’s natural habitat solved. Cactus Succul J. 2007;79: 269–273.
  27. 27. Hassan-Abdallah A, Merito A, Hassan S, Aboubaker D, Djama M, Asfaw Z, et al. Medicinal plants and their uses by the people in the Region of Randa, Djibouti. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;148: 701–713. pmid:23707214
  28. 28. Govaerts R. World checklist of seed plants 3,2,a 3,2,a. Antwerp: MIM bvba; 1999.
  29. 29. Lock JM. Legumes of Africa: a check-list. Kew: Royal Bot. Gardens; 1989.
  30. 30. Roskov Y, Abucay L, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Bailly N, Kirk PM, et al. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life. 2017, Annual Checklist. Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2017. Species 2000: Naturalis, Leiden, the Netherlands. ISSN 2405-884X. 2018.
  31. 31. Musselman LJ. Flora of Somalia. Econ Bot. 2007;61: 200–200.
  32. 32. Hedberg I, editor. Apiaceae to Dipsacaceae. Addis Ababa: National Herbarium [u.a.]; 2003.
  33. 33. Edwards S, Tadesse M, Demissew S, Hedberg I. Magnoliaceae to flacourtiaceae. Flora Ethiop Eritrea. 2000;2: 532.
  34. 34. Hedberg I, Kelbessa E, Edwards S, Demissew S, Persson E. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea, Volume 5: Gentianaceae to Cyclocheilaceae. 2006.
  35. 35. Thulin M. Flora of Somalia: Volume 3. Royal Botanic Gardens; 2006.
  36. 36. Demissew S. The genus Hildebrandtia (Convolvulaceae) from mainland Africa and Arabia. Kew Bull. 1996; 525–541.
  37. 37. Demissew S, Nordal I. Aloes and other Lilies of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Shama books; 2010.
  38. 38. Hedberg I, Edwards S. Flora of Ethiopia, vol. 3. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: National Herbarium, Biology Dept., Science Faculty, Addis Ababa University; Uppsala, Sweden: Dept. of Systematic Botany, Uppsala University; 1989.
  39. 39. Thulin M, Lock JM, editors. Flora of Somalia. Vol. 2: Angiospermae (Tiliaceae—Apiaceae). Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1999.
  40. 40. Andersson M, Bergendorff O, Shan R, Zygmunt P, Sterner O. Minor Components with Smooth Muscle Relaxing Properties from Scented Myrrh (Commiphora guidotti). Planta Med. 1997;63: 251–254. pmid:9225607
  41. 41. Demissew S. A Description of Some Essential Oil Bearing Plants in Ethiopia and Their Indigenous Uses. J Essent Oil Res. 1993;5: 465–479.
  42. 42. Riet F de SJ van der. Diseases of plants transmissible between plants and man (Phytonoses) exist–follow-up paper. Med Hypotheses. 2000;54: 310–311. pmid:10790767