Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Ana Paula Carvalhal Moura,
  • Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza Ribeiro,
  • Wanderley Marques Bernardo,
  • Ricardo Simões,
  • Ulysses S. Torres,
  • Giuseppe D’Ippolito,
  • Marc Bazot,
  • Paulo Augusto Ayrosa Galvão Ribeiro

In the Results section of the Abstract, there is an error in the second sentence. The correct sentence is: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- values of MRI for RE were 88% (95% CI, 85–91%), 90% (95% CI, 88–92%), 17.26 (95% CI, 3.57–83.50), and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10–0.23); values of TVS were 90% [95% CI, 87–92%], 96% (95% CI, 94–97%), 20.66 (95% CI, 8.71–49.00) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08–0.20), respectively.

Reference

  1. 1. Moura APC, Ribeiro HSAA, Bernardo WM, Simões R, Torres US, D’Ippolito G, et al. (2019) Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0214842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214842 pmid:30964888

Citation: Moura APC, Ribeiro HSAA, Bernardo WM, Simões R, Torres US, D’Ippolito G, et al. (2019) Correction: Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221499

Published: August 16, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Moura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.