Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A phantom study to assess the reproducibility, robustness and accuracy of PET image segmentation methods against statistical fluctuations

Retraction

Following the publication of this article [1], concerns were raised regarding the authorship and ownership of the presented data. The University of Manchester investigated the authorship and data ownership concerns, and informed PLOS ONE that the data presented in this article were acquired at the University of Manchester by former colleagues of the author, and that the author used these data without authorization, presenting work of others as their own and excluding researchers who were involved in the data acquisition as co-authors.

In light of the institution’s findings, and in line with the institution’s recommendation, the COPE Retraction Guidelines [2], and the PLOS Plagiarism policy [3], the PLOS ONE Editors retract this article.

Since the author did not have authorization of the data owner(s) to publish the data and study information reported in this article, the retracted PLOS ONE article was removed from the PLOS ONE website at the time of retraction. The article’s Copyright and Data Availability statements were updated at the time of retraction and removal, and the removed contents are no longer offered under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

The author did not agree with the retraction.

1 Dec 2022: The PLOS ONE Editors (2022) Retraction: A phantom study to assess the reproducibility, robustness and accuracy of PET image segmentation methods against statistical fluctuations. PLOS ONE 17(12): e0277627. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277627 View retraction