Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of yellow leaf coloration in Populus deltoides Marsh

  • Shuzhen Zhang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Landscape Architecture of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Xiaolu Wu,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation College of Landscape Architecture of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Jie Cui,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation College of Landscape Architecture of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Fan Zhang ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    nolady@163.com

    Affiliation College of Landscape Architecture of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Xueqin Wan,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition

    Affiliation College of Forestry of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Qinglin Liu,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation College of Landscape Architecture of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Yu Zhong,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation College of Forestry of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Tiantian Lin

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation College of Forestry of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Abstract

Populus deltoides Marsh has high ornamental value because its leaves remain yellow during the non-dormant period. However, little is known about the regulatory mechanism of leaf coloration in P. deltoides Marsh. Thus, we analyzed the physiological and transcriptional differences of yellow leaves (mutant) and green leaves (wild-type) of P. deltoides Marsh. Physiological experiments showed that the contents of chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid were lower in mutant leaves, and the flavonoid content did not differ significantly between mutant and wild-type leaves. Transcriptomic sequencing was further used to identify 153 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Functional classifications based on Gene Ontology enrichment and Genome enrichment analysis indicated that the DEGs were involved in Chl biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways. Among these, geranylgeranyl diphosphate (CHLP) genes associated with Chl biosynthesis showed down-regulation, while chlorophyllase (CLH) genes associated with Chl degradation were up-regulated in yellow leaves. The expression levels of these genes were further confirmed using quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). Furthermore, the estimation of the main precursors of Chl confirmed that CHLP is a vital enzyme for the yellow leaf color phenotype. Consequently, the formation of yellow leaf color is due to the disruption of Chl synthesis or catabolism rather than flavonoid synthesis. These results contribute to our understanding of mechanisms and regulation of leaf color variation in poplar at the transcriptional level.

Introduction

Leaf color is an important feature of ornamental plants, and trees with colored leaves have been widely cultivated in landscape gardens. The main factors that determine foliage color are the pigment types and their relative concentrations. The formation of red leaves is the result of anthocyanin accumulation, which has been extensively studied [1]. In contrast, there are only a few studies focused on the mechanism of yellow leaves. Leaf yellowing is generally considered to be caused by decreased chlorophyll (Chl) content because Chl is the main pigment content of green leaves [2]. Therefore, studies of leaf yellowing have mostly focused on Chl biosynthesis and degradation. In addition, leaf yellowing may be due also to the accumulation of flavonoids, such as flavanol, flavonol, chalcone and aurone [3,4].

The Chl biosynthetic pathway consists of about 20 different enzymatic steps, starting from glutamyl-tRNA to Chl a and Chl b [5]. Mutations in any one of the genes of the pathway can affect the accumulation of Chl [6], decrease photosynthetic capacity [7] and affect the development of chloroplast [8]. The silence of CHLD and CHLI (magnesium chelatase subunit D and I) induced by viruses in peas resulted in yellow leaf phenotypes with rapid reduction of photosynthetic proteins, undeveloped thylakoid membranes, altered chloroplast nucleoid structure and malformed antenna complexes [9]. Moreover, in rice, PGL10 encoded protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B (PORB), pale-green leaf mutant pgl10 had decreased Chl (a and b), carotenoid contents, as well as grana lamellae of chloroplasts compared with the wild-type [10]. In addition, mutants with disrupted Chl degradation were used to characterize many steps in the Chl degradation pathway in leaves undergoing senescence [11]. In Arabidopsis mutants deficient in PPH (pheophytinase), Chl degradation is inhibited and the plants exhibit a type C stay-green phenotype during senescence [12]. Previous studies revealed that chlorophyllase (Chlase) is involved in Chl degradation in ethylene-treated citrus fruit and could regulate the balance between different plant defense pathways and enhance plant resistance to bacteria [1315]. Recently, mutants deficient in Chl biosynthesis and degradation have been identified in many yellow leafed plants, such as rice [1619], Arabidopsis thaliana [20] and pak-choi [21].

The genotype P. deltoides Marsh (mutant) is a bud mutation of green leaf P. deltoides Marsh (wild-type) (Fig 1). The mutant is a rare deciduous yellow leaf variety in poplar plants of the Salicaceae family. This species has extremely high ornamental value because its leaves remain golden in spring, summer and autumn. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the leaf color of the mutant has not yet been elucidated. Bud mutation is a type of somatic mutation resulting in visible differences from the remainder of the plant in size, shape, color of fruit, branch and flower. Bud mutation arises from genetic mutation of the bud meristem cell [22]. Many ornamental plant cultivars with fruit or flower color variation arose from the bud mutation. For instance, the color in grape skin changes from white to red due to bud mutation [23]. Flower color mutants of roses, carnations and chrysanthemums have also been reported [24]. In contrast, yellow leaf phenotype caused by bud mutations were hardly reported, but the studies related to yellow leaf color were mostly focused on leaf yellowing. For example, the tea cultivar ‘Anji Baicha’ produces yellow or white shoots at low temperatures and turns green when the environmental temperature increases [25]. Only a few studies have reported the yellow leaf phenotype, such as the cucumber Chl-deficient golden leaf mutation [26].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Wild-type (left) and mutant (right) leaves phenotype.

Bar = 5 cm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g001

In this study, the photosynthetic pigments, Chl precursors, and flavonoids were estimated and transcriptome level changes of the mutant-type and wild-type were analyzed. Based on a combination of physiological analysis and bioinformatics, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to Chl and flavonoid biosynthesis. Furthermore, the expression of DEGs involved in leaf coloration was validated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Our results clarified the physiological and transcriptomic aspects of golden leaf coloration in P. deltoides Marsh and will serve as a platform to advance the understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying the leaf color formation in poplar and other plant species.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The green leaf Populus cultivar (wild-type) and the yellow leaf Populus cultivar (mutant) were used in this study. The plants were three-years-old and grown in Hongxia Nursery, Mianzhu Town, Sichuan Province, China. Leaf tissues were collected in May, sampling three leaves per plant for five plants of each type. The leaves were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen after collection and stored at −80°C for subsequent experiments.

Pigment content estimates

Approximately 0.1 g wild-type and mutant leaves were selected for Chl and carotenoid estimations. The pigment (Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoid) contents were estimated using the method described by Lichtenthaler [27]. Uroporphyrinogen III (Urogen III) and coproporphyrinogen III (Coprogen III) were extracted and determined as described by Bogorad [28]. Leaves were ground into powder with liquid nitrogen and dissolved in nine volumes of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) in an ice bath and centrifuged (30 min at 8000 rpm) to estimate the contents of protoporphyrin IX (Proto IX), magnesium protoporphyrin IX (Mg-Proto IX), protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) and chlorophyllide (Chlide) a. The supernatant was used to determine pigments using ELISA kit (MEIMIAN, Jiangsu, China) with a Thermo Scientific Multiskan FC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Flavonoid contents were estimated using a UV1901 PCS Double beam UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (Shanghai Yoke Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the instructions of the Favonoid Plant kit (Suzhou Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China). Three biological replicates were evaluated for each sample. The data were analyzed with t-tests using version 17.0 of SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and means were compared at the significance levels 0.01 and 0.05. Wild-type was used as a control and calculated as 1 for the relative values of photosynthetic pigments and Chl precursors.

Extraction of RNA

Total RNA was isolated from the wild-type and mutant using the CTAB extraction method. RNA concentration and quality were checked with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). RNA purity was measured with a Nano Drop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Library preparation for transcriptome sequencing

Two RNA samples were treated with DNaseI to remove any remaining DNA, and then the oligo (dT) magnetic beads were used to collect the poly A mRNA fraction. After mixing the poly A mRNA fraction with fragmentation buffer, the resulting mRNA was broken into short RNA inserts of approximately 200 nt. The fragments were used to synthesize the first cDNA strand via random hexamer priming, and the second-strand cDNA was then synthesized using DNA polymerase I and RNase H. The cDNA fragments were purified using magnetic beads and subjected to end-repair before adding a terminal A at the 3' ends. Finally, sequencing adaptors were ligated to the short fragments, which were purified and amplified via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The two libraries were generated and then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeqTM 4000 platform by Chengdu Life Baseline Technology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China).

Quality control and mapping of reads

The raw reads were edited to remove adapter sequences, low-quality reads, and reads with >10% of Q < 20 bases, and then mapped using HISAT v2.0.0 software (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/hisat2/downloads/) to the Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray genome. All the clean reads are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Short Read Archive (SRA) Sequence Database (accession number SRA740964).

Gene expression analysis

For gene expression analysis, gene abundance was estimated by RSEM v1.2.30 (http://dewe/ylab.github.io/RSEM/) and then normalized with fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (FPKM) values [29]. The NOIseq v2.16.0 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/NOISeq.html) was used to identify genes that were differently expressed between wild-type and mutant in this experiment. Genes with probability>0.8 and |log2 fold change| ≥ 1 were considered as DEGs between samples.

For functional annotation, GO enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed in the GO database (http://www.geneontology.org/) to calculate gene numbers for every term. The hypergeometric test was conducted to find significantly enriched GO terms in the input list of DEGs. KEGG enrichment analysis was implemented using the database resource (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). The calculation method of KEGG analysis is the same as the GO analysis.

Real-time RT-PCR

For qPCR analysis, total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China). Approximately 1 μg RNA was reverse transcribed via a TransScript All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Eight genes were selected for validation using qRT-PCR. Primer sequences were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software as shown in S3 Table. qPCR DNA amplification and analysis were performed using the TransScript Top Green qPCR SuperMix kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol with an CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The thermal profile was as follows: pre-denaturation at 94°C for 30 s; 94°C for 5 s, 60°C for 30 s, for 40 cycles. The relative expression level of selected genes in wild-type and mutant was normalized to CDC2 and ACT expression. Three biological replicates for each of the reactions were performed. The relative expression levels of target genes were estimated using the 2–ΔΔCt method [30].

Results

Pigment content analysis

We analyzed changes in the pigment contents of wild-type and mutant leaves. The Urogen III content of the yellow leaves was significantly higher than that of the wild-type, whereas there were no significant differences in Coprogen III (Fig 2). Proto IX, Mg-Proto IX and Pchlide contents of the mutant were significantly decreased by about 52.53%-64.71% than green leaves. The content of Chlide a in yellow leaves was lower than that of green leaves. Compared with the green leaves, the Chl a content, Chl b content and carotenoids content of yellow leaves were significantly lower by 72.41%, 84.86% and 53.88%, respectively (Fig 2). The ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls in yellow leaves was 0.12, which was higher than that of green leaves (0.06). In addition, the difference between the total flavonoid contents of the green leaves and yellow leaves was not significant (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Pigment contents in wild-type and mutant leaves.

(A) Schematic view of the Chl biosynthetic pathway. Urogen III (in red) at the beginning of the pathway shows a significant increase in yellow leaves. CHLG/P illustrates the gene encoding protein catalyzing the reaction of the precursors. A green box represents each component that is significantly decreased or down-regulated in the yellow leaves. Coprogen III had no significant difference between green and yellow leaves. (B) Comparison of the relative content of Chl precursors and photosynthetic pigments between wild-type and mutant. (C) Comparison of the flavonoid contents between wild-type and mutant leaves. Asterisks indicate: (*) P ⩽ 0.05, (**) P ⩽ 0.01. Abbreviations are: Urogen III = uroporphyrinogen III; Coprogen III = coproporphyrinogen III; Proto IX = protoporphyrin IX; Mg-Proto IX = Mg-protoporphyrin IX; Pchlide = protochlorophyllide; Chlide a = chlorophyllide a; Chl a = chlorophyll a; Chl b = chlorophyll b; and Caro = carotenoid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g002

RNA-seq analysis

RNA-seq libraries were constructed from green and yellow leaf samples and sequenced using the Illumina HiseqTM 4000 platform for acquiring a comprehensive overview of leaf coloration. Approximately 45 million and 47 million raw reads were obtained from green and yellow leaves, respectively. After removal of adapter sequence and low-quality reads, the number of clean reads in the two libraries was 40,779,290 and 41,776,346. The Q20 and Q30 of the two samples were at least 97.28 and 93.20%, respectively, and the GC content of both exceeded 45%. Additionally, 73.79% of green leaves and 71.67% of yellow leaves reads of each sample were mapped to the Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray genome sequence and approximately 47% of the mapped reads were found to be unique (Table 1).

Gene expression analysis

In total, the number of expressed genes were 28,657 and 28,124 in green and yellow leaves, respectively, of which 1760 and 1227 genes were expressed specifically in the green and yellow leaves (Fig 3). In order to identify DEGs between green and yellow leaves, we set the expression of genes in green leaves as the control and identified genes that were up- or downregulated in yellow leaves. Accordingly, a total of 153 DEGs were found in yellow leaves, including 52 up-regulated genes and 101 down-regulated genes.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Number of specific and shared genes between wild-type and mutant leaves.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g003

Gene functional annotation

GO assignments were used to classify the functions of DEGs. A total of 12, 9, and 5 of the DEGs were divided into biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions, respectively, and some DEGs were annotated with more than one GO term (Fig 4). In the biological process category, many DEGs fell into the categories of ‘cellular process,’ ‘metabolic process,’ and ‘single-organism process’ (S1 Table). The most enriched terms of the cellular component were involved in ‘cell,’ ‘cell part,’ ‘membrane’ and ‘membrane part’ were also significantly enriched terms (S1 Table). Meanwhile, the dominant categories with respect to molecular function group were ‘binding’ and ‘catalytic activity’ (S1 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 4. The DEG function classification in wild-type and mutant leaves.

X-axis displays the number of genes. Y-axis is broken into three categories: biological process, cellular component and molecular function with enrichment details within each category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g004

KEGG pathway analysis was performed to categorize gene functions with an emphasis on biochemical pathways that were active in green and yellow leaves. A total of 52 genes were annotated and assigned to 31 KEGG pathways (S2 Table). The most significantly enriched pathway was ‘Metabolic pathways’ (Fig 5), with 15 associated DEGs (ranked by padj value), followed by ‘Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites’ and ‘Ribosome’ with 8 and 5 DEGs, respectively, which supported the results of GO assignments that ‘metabolic process’ was significantly enriched. Moreover, 3 DEGs were assigned to ‘Porphyrin and Chl metabolism’ and 2 DEGs were assigned to ‘Flavonoid biosynthesis.’ This cluster of results indicated that the differences in metabolic activities were the main difference between green and yellow leaves, and they may perform important roles in the regulating of leaf coloration.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs.

X-axis displays the Rich factor. Y-axis names the KEGG pathways. Dot size corresponds to the number of DEGs in the pathway with smaller dots having a lower gene number than larger dots. Dot color indicates P value with red having a high P value and blue having a low P value.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g005

Chl and flavonoid biosynthesis analysis

Based on the above annotations, we found that the P. deltoides Marsh transcriptome contains genes involved in Chl biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis (Table 2). Two genes annotated as CHLP (Potri.019G009000 and Potri.019G024600) were down-regulated in yellow leaves. In the last step of Chl a biosynthesis, the geranylgeranyl diphosphate (CHLP, EC:1.3.1.111) catalyzed the reduction of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate to phytyl pyrophosphate and yielded Chl (Fig 6). Furthermore, the gene encoding Chlase (CLH, EC:3.1.1.14) played roles in the transition of Chl a(b) to Chlide a(b), which was found to be up-regulated in yellow leaves. In flavonoid biosynthesis, two genes annotated as shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT, EC:2.3.1.133) were differentially expressed in green and yellow leaves. Of these, one gene (Potri.006G034100) was more highly expressed in green leaves while the other gene (Potri.005G028500) was more highly expressed in yellow leaves.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Chl biosynthetic pathways at the transcript level.

Red notates up-regulated genes and green marks down-regulated genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g006

thumbnail
Table 2. DEGs involved in Chl and flavonoid biosynthesis in mutant transcriptome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.t002

Validation of RNA sequencing data

To validate the accuracy of RNA-seq expression results, 8 DEGs with marked changes in plant hormone signal transduction, flavonoid biosynthesis and Chl biosynthesis were detected by qPCR (Fig 7). The results showed that except 3 genes (Potri.016G026200, Potri.005G028500, Potri.005G214100), the remaining 5 genes were all down-regulated in mutant plants. In general, qRT-PCR results concur with the RNA-seq data, indicating that the DEGs identified by RNA-seq were accurate.

thumbnail
Fig 7. RT-qPCR vs. RNA-seq analysis of 8 DEGs in mutant leaves.

X-axis is the Gene ID. Y-axis is the fold change in mutant leaves relative to that in wild-type leaves (Log2(FC)).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.g007

Discussion

P. deltoides Marsh developed yellow leaves during growth and throughout the lifespan by bud mutation. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms underlying the leaf color of P. deltoides Marsh is of significant importance. Changes in ratio of Chl, carotenoids and flavonoids in leaves will change the expression of leaf color. In this study, the compounds affecting the pigment of leaves were determined. The Chl content in the mutant P. deltoides Marshwas significantly lower than that of wild-type. Consistent with the physiological results, transcriptional analysis demonstrated that down-regulation of CHLP and up-regulation of CLH involved in porphyrin and Chl metabolism pathways were crucial genes that resulted in yellow leaves.

Carotenoids provide yellow, orange and red color to flowers and fruits, which play crucial roles in photosystem assembly, light-harvesting and photoprotection [31,32]. In this study, the carotenoid content decreased significantly in mutant compared with wild-type leaves. Significant reductions in the carotenoid content were also observed in previous studies in yellow-green winter wheat mutant Ygm and Pak-choi yellow leaf mutant pylm [33, 21]. However, in Ginkgo biloba L, the carotenoids content in the mutant leaves was higher than that of normal green leaves [2]. This carotenoid content may have been higher because the mutants of Ginkgo biloba were special golden–green striped leaves. The ratio of carotenoids to Chl drives yellow leaf coloration, and the photosynthetic pigment contents in the green leaves are similar to the yellow parts of mutant leaves. By contrast, the mutant in our study is normal, and the total photosynthetic pigment contents in green leaves are 4 times that of yellow leaves. In addition, increased ratio of carotenoids to Chl was observed in both pylm mutant and Ginkgo biloba mutant [21, 2]. Consistent with these research findings, the ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls in yellow leaves was two-fold higher than that in green leaves in our study, thus suggesting that the increase of ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls was related to yellow coloration in P. deltoides Marsh. Our transcriptional results demonstrated that no genes were annotated to the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway.

Chl biosynthetic genes differentially express in leaf color mutants

Leaf color formation is closely related to Chl biosynthesis and breakdown, and most leaf color mutations are Chl-deficiency mutations [34]. Chl is responsible for harvesting solar energy and electron transport, even turning plants green because it is Mg2+-containing tetrapyrrole pigment [35]. In this study, the novel Chl-deficient chlorina mutant of P. deltoides Marsh with yellow leaf phenotype was identified. Compared with wild-type, the content of photosynthetic pigments in the mutant were significantly lower. In particular, the Chl b content was six times higher in green leaves than yellow leaves. These results suggest that the yellow leaf phenotype is a result of a lack of Chls.

The Chl metabolic process can be subdivided into three parts: biosynthesis of Chl a, the Chl cycle between Chl a and b, and degradation of Chl a [3648]. Chl is composed of two moieties, Chlide and phytol, which are respectively formed from the precursor molecules 5-aminolevulinate and isopentenyl diphosphate [39]. CHLP encodes the enzyme geranylgeranyl reductase catalyzing terminal hydrogenation of geranylgeraniol to phytol for Chl synthesis [40,41]. Previous studies revealed that in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) expressing antisense CHLP RNA, transformants with gradually reduced CHLP expression displayed a uniform low pigmentation and a pale or variegated phenotype [42]. In cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, ΔchlP mutant exhibit decreased Chl and total carotenoids contents, and unstable photosystems I and II [43]. Two CHLP genes (Potri.019G009000 and Potri.019G024600) were identified in our database and both were down-regulated in the mutant. In the meantime, qPCR experiments further verified that expression levels of CHLP genes in mutant were highly reduced compared to those in wild-type, which suggests a later stage of Chl biosynthesis was inhibited. Parallel experiments also showed that the content of Chlide a was about 4.83% lower, while the content of Chl a was 72.41% lower in the yellow leaves compared to green leaves. The result suggests that the inhibition of enzyme activity of CHLP protein is likely to further suppress the biosynthesis of Chl in yellow leaves. In addition, our physiological results show that the content of Urogen Ⅲ in the yellow leaves is about 4 times than that of the green leaves, but the content of Coprogen III is not significantly different between green and yellow leaves. Therefore, there might be a suppression between Urogen Ⅲ and Coprogen III during Chl biosynthesis. However, the results need further verification.

Chl breakdown starts with the reduction of Chl b, which is then converted into Chl a via two steps of enzymatic reaction, and finishes by producing nonfluorescent chlorophyll catabolite or nonfluorescent dioxobilin-type chlorophyll catabolite [44]. Chlase, the Chl dephytilation enzyme, catalyzes the hydrolysis ester bond of Chl to yield Chlide and phytol [45]. Chlase activity is negatively correlated with Chl levels of color break in citrus fruits and Chlase participates in the Chl breakdown in citrus [15,46,47]. The citrus Chlase1 gene was overexpressed in squash and tobacco. Expression of Chlase without the N-terminal 21 amino acids (ChlaseΔN) resulted in chlorosis in plants, whereas expression of the fulllength Chlase resulted in moderate Chl breakdown [46]. Subsequently, citrus Chlase was demonstrated to be translated and processed to a mature form, which is subject to dual N- and C-terminal processing [15,47]. However, some evidence does not support that Chlase play a critical role in Chl degradation during leaf senescence [4851]. For example, overexpression of ATHCOR1, which has Chlase activity in Arabidopsis, led to an increased breakdown of Chl a, but the total Chl level was not affected [48]. Similarly, a short delay in yellowing was observed in the antisense BoCLH1-positive transformants [49]. Arabidopsis Chlases (AtCLH1 and AtCLH2) are not positively regulated with leaf senescence. CHL1 and CHL2 single and double knockout mutant plants do not display a significant delay in senescence [50]. A previous study suggested that Chlase was not involved in Chl breakdown in the absence of methyljasmonate and exhibited a defense response when plants were damaged [51]. Schelbert et al. also supported the opinions that Chlase was not to be essential for dephytylation after Chl is converted into pheophorbide [12]. In our study, the transcript expression patterns suggested that the expression of CLH was higher in wild-type than in mutant. Moreover, previous studies in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) showed that the gene encoding Chlase in the Chl biosynthesis pathway was also significantly up-regulated in the yellow leaf mutant [33]. Therefore, experiments related to cloning and functional verification of CLH in P. deltoides Marsh are needed to further verify the function of Chlase in Chl breakdown.

Flavonoid biosynthetic genes differentially express in leaf color mutants

Flavonoids, carotenoids, and Chls are the main pigments responsible for flower and leaf color. Previous studies have demonstrated that flavonoids are the main pigments, producing purple, blue, yellow, and red colors in plants [52]. Flavonoids have been known as UV-protecting pigments and antioxidants by scavenging molecular species of active oxygen [53,54]. In Ficus microcarpa L. f., the golden leaf mutant is the result of continuous high-light irradiation, and the flavonoid level of golden leaf was 5-fold higher than that of green leaf, the results suggest that the increase of flavonoids in the golden leaf may protect the leaves from high-light stress [55]. In this study, there are no significant differences in the content of flavonoid between wild-type and mutant. Therefore, we consider the yellow leaf phenotype to be caused by genetic factors, not environmental factors. Shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (E2.3.1.133, HCT) belongs to the large family of BAHD-like acyltransferases [56]. It is a key enzyme that determines whether 4-coumaroyl CoA is the direct precursor for flavonoid or H-lignin biosynthesis [57]. In Arabidopsis, silencing of the HCT gene resulted in severely reduced growth and absence of S lignin [58]. The down-regulation of HCT have a dramatic effect on lignin content and composition in alfalfa and poplar [59,60]. Up until now, most studies have focused on the effects of HCT on lignin synthesis [61, 62], while only a few studies related HCT to flower color or leaf color of plants. It is further proven that the blocked Chl synthesis pathway in mutant-type plants may be the consequence of yellowing of the leaves.

Conclusions

In this study, physiological and transcriptome sequence analysis showed that there were distinct differences in coloration between green and yellow mutant leaves of P. deltoides Marsh. Transcriptional sequence analysis identified 5 DEGs that participated in porphyrin and Chl metabolism and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways. Furthermore, RT-qPCR verified that those DEGs were expressed differentially in mutant and wild-type plants. Down-regulation of CHLP and up-regulation of CLH might cause the difference of leaves. These results provide an excellent platform for future studies to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying the yellowing phenotype in P. deltoides Marsh and other closely related species.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Significantly enriched gene ontologies among downregulated or upregulated genes in mutant compared to wild-type.

GO enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed in the GO database (http://www.geneontology.org/) to calculate gene numbers for every term. The hypergeometric test was conducted to find significantly enriched GO terms in the input list of DEGs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Wild-type vs. mutant pathway enrichment.

KEGG enrichment analysis was implemented using the database resource (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). The hypergeometric test was conducted to find significantly enriched KEGG terms in the input list of DEGs. The closer Pvalue is to zero, the more significant the enrichment is. some DEGs were annotated with more than one pathway.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216879.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hongxia Nursery, China for providing support in the present investigation.

References

  1. 1. Li Z, Wang J, Zhang X, Xu L. Comparative transcriptome analysis of anthurium “albama” and its anthocyanin-loss mutant. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0119027. pmid:25781998
  2. 2. Li WX, Yang SB, Lu ZG, He ZC, Ye YL, Zhao BB, et al. Cytological, physiological, and transcriptomic analyses of golden leaf coloration in Ginkgo biloba L. Hortic Res. 2018; 5. pmid:29507736
  3. 3. Tanaka Y, Sasaki N, Ohmiya A. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 2008; 54: 733–749. pmid:18476875
  4. 4. Tanaka Y, Brugliera F, Kalc G, Senior M, Dyson B, Nakamura N, et al. Flower color modification by engineering of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway: practical perspectives. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010; 74: 1760–1769. pmid:20834175
  5. 5. Nagata N, Tanaka R, Satoh S, Tanaka A. Identification of a vinyl reductase gene for chlorophyll synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana and implications for the evolution of Prochlorococcus species. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 233–240. pmid:15632054
  6. 6. Li W, Tang S, Zhang S, Shan J, Tang C, Chen Q, et al. Gene mapping and functional analysis of the novel leaf color gene SiYGL1 in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv]. Physiol Plant. 2015; 157: 24–37. pmid:26559175
  7. 7. Wu Z, Zhang X, He B, Diao L, Sheng S, Wang J, et al. A chlorophyll-deficient rice mutant with impaired chlorophyllide esterification in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145: 29–40. pmid:17535821
  8. 8. Zhu X, Guo S, Wang Z, Du Q, Xing Y, Zhang T, et al. Map-based cloning and functional analysis of YGL8, which controls leaf colour in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2016; 16: 134. pmid:27297403
  9. 9. Luo T, Luo S, Araujo WL, Schlicke H, Rothbart M, Yu J, et al. Virus-induced gene silencing of pea CHLI and CHLD affects tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, chloroplast development and the primary metabolic network. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013; 65: 17–26. pmid:23416492
  10. 10. Yang YL, Xu J, Rao YC, Zeng YJ, Liu HJ, Zheng TT, et al. Cloning and functional analysis of pale-green leaf (PGL10) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2016; 78: 69–77.
  11. 11. Hörtensteiner S. Update on the biochemistry of chlorophyll breakdown. Plant Mol Biol. 2013; 82: 505–17. pmid:22790503
  12. 12. Schelbert S, Aubry S, Burla B, Agne B, Kessler F, Krupinska K, et al. Pheophytin pheophorbide hydrolase (pheophytinase) is involved in chlorophyll breakdown during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009: 21: 767–85. pmid:19304936
  13. 13. Kariola T, Brader G, Li J, Palva ET. Chlorophyllase 1, a damage control enzyme, affects the balance between defense pathways in plants. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 282–294. pmid:15598807
  14. 14. Jacob-Wilk D, Holland D, Goldschmidt EE, Riov J, Eyal Y. Chlorophyll breakdown by chlorophyllase: Isolation and functional expression of the Chlase1 gene from ethylene-treated Citrus fruit and its regulation during development. Plant J. 1999; 20: 653–661. pmid:10652137
  15. 15. Azoulay Shemer T, Harpaz-Saad S, Belausov E, Lovat N, Krokhin O, Spicer V, et al. Citrus chlorophyllase dynamics at ethylene-induced fruit color-break: A study of chlorophyllase expression, posttranslational processing kinetics, and in situ intracellular localization. Plant Physiol. 2008; 148: 108–118. pmid:18633118
  16. 16. Jung KH, Hur J, Ryu CH, Choi Y, Chung YY, Miyao A, et al. Characterization of a Rice Chlorophyll-Deficient Mutant Using the T-DNA Gene-Trap System. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003; 44: 463–472. pmid:12773632
  17. 17. Wang P, Gao J, Wan C, Zhang F, Xu Z, Huang X, et al. Divinyl chlorophyll(ide) a can be converted to monovinyl chlorophyll(ide) a by a divinyl reductase in rice. Plant Physio. 2010; 153: 994–1003. pmid:20484022
  18. 18. Liu W, Fu Y, Hu G, Si H, Zhu L, Wu C, et al. Identification and fine mapping of a thermo-sensitive chlorophyll deficient mutant in rice (oryza sativa L.). Planta. 2007; 226: 785–795. pmid:17541632
  19. 19. Sakuraba Y, Rahman ML, Cho SH, Kim YS, Koh HJ, Yoo SC, et al. The rice faded green leaf locus encodes protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B and is essential for chlorophyll synthesis under high light conditions. Plant J. 2013; 74: 122–133. pmid:23289852
  20. 20. Sakuraba Y, Park SY, Kim YS, Wang SH, Yoo SC, Hrtensteiner S, et al. Arabidopsis stay-green2 is a negative regulator of chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence. Mol Plant. 2014; 7: 1288–1302. pmid:24719469
  21. 21. Zhang K, Liu Z, Shan X, Li C, Tang X, Chi M, et al. Physiological properties and chlorophyll biosynthesis in a pak-choi (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis) yellow leaf mutant, pylm. Acta Physiol Plant. 2017; 39: 22.
  22. 22. D’Amato F. Role of somatic mutations in the evolution of higher plants. Caryologia. 1997; 50: 1–15.
  23. 23. Akifumi A, Shozo K, Nami GY, Mikio S, Nobuhito M, Hiroshi Y, et al. Color recovery in berries of grape (vitis vinifera L.) ‘benitaka’, a bud sport of ‘italia’, is caused by a novel allele at the VvmybA1 locus. Plant Sci. 2009; 176: 470–478. pmid:26493136
  24. 24. Wasscher J. The importance of sports in some florist's flowers. Euphytica. 1956; 5: 163–170.
  25. 25. Li CF, Xu YX, Ma JQ, Jin JQ, Huang DJ, Yao MZ, et al. Biochemical and transcriptomic analyses reveal different metabolite biosynthesis profiles among three color and developmental stages in ‘Anji Baicha’ (camellia sinensis). BMC Plant Bio. 2016; 16: 195. pmid:27609021
  26. 26. Gao M, Hu L, Li Y, Weng Y. The chlorophyll-deficient golden leaf mutation in cucumber is due to a single nucleotide substitution in CsChlI for magnesium chelatase I subunit. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129: 1–13. pmid:26276148
  27. 27. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987; 148: 350–382.
  28. 28. Bogorad L. Porphyrin synthesis. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO, editors. Methods in Enzymology. New York: Academic Press; 1962. pp. 885–895.
  29. 29. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008; 5: 621–628. pmid:18516045
  30. 30. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3: 1101–1108. pmid:18546601
  31. 31. Li Z, Wakao S, Fischer BB, Niyogi KK. Sensing and responding to excess light. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009; 60: 239–260. pmid:19575582
  32. 32. Cazzonelli CI, Pogson BJ. Source to sink: regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2010; 15: 266–274. pmid:20303820
  33. 33. Wu H, Shi N, An X, Liu C, Fu H, Cao L, et al. Candidate genes for yellow leaf color in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and major related metabolic pathways according to transcriptome profiling. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 1594. pmid:29843474
  34. 34. Wang L, Yue C, Cao H, Zhou Y, Zeng J, Yang Y, et al. Biochemical and transcriptome analyses of a novel chlorophyll-deficient chlorina tea plant cultivar. BMC Plant Physiol. 2014; 14: 352. pmid:25491435
  35. 35. Tanaka A, Tanaka R. Chlorophyll metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9: 248–255. pmid:16603411
  36. 36. Eckhardt U, Grimm B, Hortensteiner S. Recent advances in chlorophyll biosynthesis and breakdown in higher plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2004; 56: 1–14. pmid:15604725
  37. 37. Tanaka A, Ito H, Tanaka R, Tanaka NK, Yoshida K, Okada K. Chlorophyll a oxygenase (CAO) is involved in chlorophyll b formation from chlorophyll a. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998; 95: 12719–12723. pmid:9770552
  38. 38. Masuda T, Fujita Y. Regulation and evolution of chlorophyll metabolism. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2008; 7: 1131–1149. pmid:18846277
  39. 39. von Wettstein D, Gough S, Kannangara CG. Chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995; 7: 1039–1057. pmid:12242396
  40. 40. Addlesee HA, Gibson LC, Jensen PE, Hunter CN. Cloning, sequencing and functional assignment of the chlorophyll biosynthesis gene, chlp, of Synechocystis sp. pcc 6803. FEBS Lett. 1996; 389: 126–130. pmid:8766814
  41. 41. Addlesee HA, Hunter CN. Physical mapping and functional assignment of the geranylgeranyl-bacteriochlorophyll reductase gene, bchP, of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1999; 181: 7248. pmid:10572128
  42. 42. Tanaka R, Oster U, Kruse E, Rudiger W, Grimm B. Reduced activity of geranylgeranyl reductase leads to loss of chlorophyll and tocopherol and to partially geranylgeranylated chlorophyll in transgenic tobacco plants expressing antisense RNA for geranylgeranyl reductase. Plant Physiol. 1999; 120: 695–704. pmid:10398704
  43. 43. Shpilyov AV, Zinchenko VV, Shestakov SV, Grimm B, Lokstein H. Inactivation of the geranylgeranyl reductase (ChlP) gene in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. pcc 6803. BBA—Bioenergetics. 2005; 1706: 195–203. pmid:15694347
  44. 44. Oda-Yamamizo C, Mitsuda N, Sakamoto S, Ogawa D, Ohme-Takagi M, Ohmiya A. The NAC transcription factor ANAC046 is a positive regulator of chlorophyll degradation and senescence in Arabidopsis leaves. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 23609. pmid:27021284
  45. 45. Tsuchiya T, Ohta H, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Shimada H, Masuda T, et al. Cloning of chlorophyllase, the key enzyme in chlorophyll degradation: finding of a lipase motif and the induction by methyl jasmonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96: 15362–15367. pmid:10611389
  46. 46. Harpaz-Saad S, Azoulay T, Arazi T, Ben-Yaakov E, Mett A, Shiboleth YM, et al. Chlorophyllase is a rate-limiting enzyme in chlorophyll catabolism and is posttranslationally regulated. Plant Cell. 2007; 19: 1007–1022. pmid:17369368
  47. 47. Azoulay-Shemer T, Harpaz-Saad S, Cohen-Peer R, Mett A, Spicer V, Lovat N, et al. Dual N- and C-terminal processing of citrus chlorophyllase precursor within the plastid membranes leads to the mature enzyme. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011; 52: 70–83. pmid:21071427
  48. 48. Benedetti CE, Arruda P. Altering the expression of the chlorophyllase gene ATHCOR1 in transgenic Arabidopsis caused changes in the chlorophyll-to-chlorophyllide ratio. Plant Physiol. 2002; 128: 1255–1263. pmid:11950974
  49. 49. Chen LFO, Lin CH, Kelkar SM, Chang YM, Shaw JF. Transgenic broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) with antisense chlorophyllase (BoCLH1) delays postharvest yellowing. Plant Sci. 2008; 174: 25–31.
  50. 50. Schenk N, Schelbert S, Kanwischer M, Goldschmidt EE, Dormann P, Hortensteiner S. The chlorophyllases AtCLH1 and AtCLH2 are not essential for senescence-related chlorophyll breakdown in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2007; 581: 5517–5525. pmid:17996203
  51. 51. Hu X, Makita S, Schelbert S, Sano S, Ochiai M, Tsuchiya T, et al. Reexamination of chlorophyllase function implies its involvement in defense against chewing herbivores. Plant Physiol. 2015; 167: 660–670. pmid:25583926
  52. 52. Sobel JM, Streisfeld MA. Flower color as a model system for studies of plant evo-devo. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4: 321. pmid:23970892
  53. 53. Schmelzer E, Jahnen W, Hahlbrock K. In situ localization of light-induced chalcone synthase mrna, chalcone synthase, and flavonoid end products in epidermal cells of parsley leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988; 85: 2989–2993. pmid:16578833
  54. 54. Hernández I, Alegre L, Van Breusegem F, Munné-Bosch S. How relevant are flavonoids as antioxidants in plants? Trends Plant Sci. 2009; 14: 125–132. pmid:19230744
  55. 55. Yamasaki H, Heshiki R, Ikehara N. Leaf-goldenning induced by high light in Ficus microcarpa L.f., a tropical fig. J Plant Res. 1995; 108: 171–180.
  56. 56. D'Auria JC. Acyltransferases in plants: a good time to be BAHD. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9: 331–340. pmid:16616872
  57. 57. Li X, Bonawitz ND, Weng JK, Chapple C. The growth reduction associated with repressed lignin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana is independent of flavonoids. Plant Cell. 2010; 22: 1620–1632. pmid:20511296
  58. 58. Hoffmann L, Besseau S, Geoffroy P, Ritzenthaler C, Meyer D, Lapierre C, et al. Silencing of hydroxycinnamoyl-coenzyme a shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase affects phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2004; 16: 1446–1465. pmid:15161961
  59. 59. Pu Y, Chen F, Ziebell A, Davison BH, Ragauskas AJ. NMR characterization of C3H and HCT down-regulated alfalfa lignin. BioEnergy Res. 2009; 2: 198.
  60. 60. Peng XP, Sun SL, Wen JL, Yin WL, Sun RC. Structural characterization of lignins from hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) down-regulated transgenic poplars. Fuel. 2014; 134: 485–492.
  61. 61. Cui K, Wang H, Liao S, Tang Q, Li L, Cui Y, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and analysis for culm elongation of the world’s largest bamboo (dendrocalamus sinicus). PLoS One 2016; 11: e0157362. pmid:27304219
  62. 62. Wu YF, Zhao Y, Liu XY, Gao S, Cheng AX, Lou HX. Isolation and functional characterization of hydroxycinnamoyltransferases from the liverworts plagiochasma appendiculatum, and marchantia paleacea. Plant Physiol Biochem. 129: 400–410. pmid:30691636