Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comprehensive RNA-Seq profiling of the lung transcriptome of Bashbay sheep in response to experimental Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection

  • Zhihui Du,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China

  • Yanming Sun ,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    sym@shzu.edu.cn

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China

  • Jixue Wang,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China

  • Haiyan Liu,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China

  • Yi Yang,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China

  • Ning Zhao

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China

Abstract

The Bashbay sheep (Ovis aries), an indigenous breed of Xinjiang, China, has many excellent characteristics. It is resistant to Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection, the causative agent of mycoplasma ovipneumonia, a chronic respiratory disease that is harmful to the sheep industry. To date, knowledge regarding the mechanisms responsible for M. ovipneumoniae pathogenesis in scant. Herein, we report the results of transcriptome profiling of lung tissues from Bashbay sheep experimentally infected with an M. ovipneumoniae strain at 4 and 14 days post-infection, in comparison to mock-infected animals (0 d). Transcriptome profiling was performed by deep RNA sequencing, using the Illumina platform. The analysis of differentially expressed genes was performed to determine concomitant gene-specific temporal patterns of mRNA expression in the lungs after M. ovipneumoniae infection. We found 1048 differentially expressed genes (575 up-regulated, 473 down-regulated) when comparing transcriptomic data at 4 and 0 days post-infection, and 2823 (1362 up-regulated, 1461 down-regulated) when comparing 14 versus 0 days post-infection. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes at 4 and 14 versus 0 days post-infection were enriched in 245 and 287 pathways, respectively, and the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway was considered most closely related to MO infection (p < 0.01). Two pathways (LAMP-TLR2/TLR6-MyD88-MKK6-AP1-IL1B and LAMP-TLR8MyD88-IRF5-RANTES) were identified based on the TLR signaling pathway from differentially expressed genes related M. ovipneumoniae infection. Gene Ontology analysis showed that differentially expressed genes in different groups were enriched for 1580 and 4561 terms, where those most closely related to M. ovipneumoniae infection are positive regulators of inflammatory responses (p < 0.01). These results could aid in understanding how M. ovipneumoniae infection progresses in the lungs and may provide useful information regarding key regulatory pathways.

Introduction

Mycoplasma ovipneumonia, also known as sheep contagious pleuropneumonia, is an infectious disease caused by Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae (MO) that not only affects sheep and goats worldwide, but also wild animals, such as bighorn sheep [14]. The disease is a highly contagious respiratory disease, characterized by coughing, gasping, progressive weight loss, and pulmonary interstitial hyperplasia inflammation [5]. MO has a higher infection and lethality rate in sheep which are 1–3 months old. Sheep show differing susceptibilities different types of MO infection, and sheep are more susceptible than goats. In some sheep farms, the incidence of MO infection is approximately 2–10%, and the mortality rate in infected sheep can be as high as 100%. Growth of sheep with mycoplasma pneumonia is slow because of severe damage to the lungs, and the feed-conversion ratio of such sheep is significantly higher. Sheep represent the most dangerous source of infection because MO can remain in the lungs for a considerable period of time, and MO can easily spread to the surrounding environment and infect other sheep. Moreover, infection with MO also makes sheep more vulnerable to other pathogens [6, 7].

Bashbay sheep (Ovis aries) is an indigenous breed of Yumin County (Xinjiang, China) and that many excellent characteristics, such as fast growth and development, high meat production, and disease resistance [8]. The survey conducted by Yan et al. regarding M. ovipneumoniae infection of sheep in Xinjiang showed that the incidence of mycoplasma ovipneumonia was very low in Bashbay sheep [9]. Bashbay sheep are known to have some susceptibility to MO infection, based on the findings of Du et al. that Bashbay lambs and Argali crossbred lambs could be successfully infected with MO [10]. However, while Argali crossbred lambs infected with MO presented serious clinical symptoms and typical pathological changes with a mortality rate of 33%, the clinical symptoms in Bashbay lambs were mild and the lambs showed fast recovery.

Although the host pathogenesis of MO infection has been a focus of previous research, the entire systematic mechanism of the interaction between MO and the host is unclear. In this study, we achieved our aims of performing the first transcriptomic analysis of sheep infected with MO, using high-throughput sequencing, and determining related immune-inflammatory responses in infected sheep. Therefore, in order to further understand the interaction mechanism between MO and host and to screen differentially expressed genes of Bashbay sheep anti-MO. In this study, RNASeq technology was used to study the transcriptomics of lung tissues of Bashbay sheep infected with MO.

Material and methods

MO inoculum and mycoplasma pneumonia disease model

The MO strain was provided by Prof. Yan Genqiang (Preventive Veterinary Laboratory, Animal Science and Technology Institute, Shihezi University, China). The nucleotide sequence of this strain showed 98% homology with the standard Y-98 strain. The experimental procedures were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine (approval number: A2014-079-03). The animals were housed in the stables at the Animal Hospital, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University and all procedures were carried out in accordance with the institutional ethics committee. The sheep were anaesthetized by Thiophene sodium via the intravenous injection and killed by bloodletting. Nine male Bashbay lambs were obtained from a sheep farm in Yumin County, Xinjiang, China. All the lambs were 2–3 months old, weighed 10–15 kg, and were confirmed to be sero-negative for MO using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (R&D Systems, USA).

The MO culture and experimental infection were performed according to the method of Jiang et al. [11]. The concentration of MO used for infection was approximately 106 (Color change unit, CCU)/mL, and each experimental sheep in the 4-day (4d) and 14-day (14d) groups was administered 2 mL of the culture through intratracheal injection. Each treatment group included three sheep. The three control sheep in the 0 d group were instead inoculated with normal saline equivalent to that used in the corresponding experimental sheep. The feed of sheep lacked any antibiotics, and standard clinical examinations, such as, monitoring of body temperature and clinical symptoms, were performed daily. The sheep were sacrificed before infection (0-d group), 4 d post-infection (4-DPI group), or 14 d post-infection (14-DPI group). The lung samples were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and transferred to –80°C. The sera of sheep in the 4-DPI group and 14-DPI group were collected and used for ELISA testing with an MO-specific antibody. Nasal swabs from sheep in the 4-DPI and 14-DPI groups were inoculated on MO-specific medium and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 5 days. MO growth caused the culture medium to change from red to yellow. Biochemical tests, including the glucose-fermentation test and Digitalis saponin test, were carried out to confirm the presence of MO [12].

RNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing

The MirVana mRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion-1561, USA) was used to isolate total RNA in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was purified with Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter). RNA purity was assessed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. The concentration and integrity of RNA were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies), respectively. Samples with an RNA-integrity number (RIN) ≥7 were used for subsequent analysis.

Four micrograms of RNA was used for synthesizing cDNA, which was used to construct libraries with the TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina sequencing platform (HiSeq 2500 NGS system), and 125 bp/150 bp paired-end reads were generated. The sequencing reads have been submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under the accession number E-MTAB-7408.

Mapping the sequence reads

Raw sequencing reads (raw reads) in fastq format were first processed using the NGS QC Toolkit [13]. Clean reads were obtained by removing reads containing poly-N, adapter sequences, and low-quality sequences from the raw data. All subsequent analyses were based on the high-quality reads. Reference genome and gene model annotation files were downloaded from an online website (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF_000298735.2_Oar_v4.0/GCF_000298735.2_Oar_v4.0_genomic.fna.gz). An index of the reference genome was built using Bowtie v2.2.3 [14] and paired-end clean reads were aligned to the reference genome sequence using TopHat v2.0.12 [15] (http://tophat.cbcb.umd.edu/).

Differential gene expression and functional analysis

To identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the number of clean reads mapped to each transcript was counted using HTSeq v0.6.1 [16]. The expression of each transcript was quantified by the parameter, fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM), using cufflinks [17]. Differential gene-expression analysis between two conditions/groups was performed using the DESeq R package (1.20.0), which includes estimateSizeFactors and nbinomTest functions. The data were normalized via the estimateSizeFactors function, and then p-values and fold-change values were calculated using the nbinomTest function [18]. DEGs were screened based on a fold-change in expression of >2 or <0.667, and p-values < 0.05 were considered to reflect differential expression. Subsequently, hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs was performed to explore the expression pattern of genes.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is a database resource for understanding the functions and utilities of biological systems, such as a cell, an organism, or an ecosystem based on molecular information, especially for large-scale molecular datasets generated by genome sequencing and other high-throughput experimental technologies (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). KEGG pathway-enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed using KOBAS2.0 software [19] (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/home.do). Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEGs was implemented using the GOseq R package [20].

Validation by reverse transcriptase-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)

To validate the RNA-Seq results, six DEGs (ACYP2, CXCR3, FAM195A, ISG20, RHOD, and BPIFA1) were chosen for confirmation of expression diversity by real-time PCR (StepOnePlus, ThermoFisher), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal reference gene for normalization. All quantitative measurements were taken in triplicate. The real-time PCR primers were designed using Beacon Designer 7 (Table 1). The expression levels of target genes were normalized to the reference gene, and relative expression changes were calculated using the comparative 2ΔΔCT method [21]. Statistical analysis (Mann–Whitney U test) of the RT-qPCR data was performed with GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, USA). A p-value <0.05 was considered to reflect a statistically significant difference.

thumbnail
Table 1. Details of the RT-qPCR assays used to validate the RNA-Seq results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.t001

Results

Establishment of the mycoplasma pneumonia disease model

The ELISA results showed that all the sheep without MO infection were seronegative and that the three sheep infected with MO were seropositive at 14 DPI. Cotton swabs that were dipped in the nasal cavity were inoculated into the MO medium. After 5–6 days, the color of the medium changed from red to yellow. A small portion of the medium was transferred to a slide and Giemsa staining was performed. Spherical and pleomorphic Mycoplasma could be observed under the microscope. The results of biochemical identification (Table 2) confirmed the identity of the observed bacteria as MO, indicating that the disease model of M. pneumoniae was successfully established. In addition, all three sheep in the 4-d group were seronegative, and no MO could be isolated. Moreover, clinical signs (coughing, wheezing, and increased temperature) were observed in sheep after MO infection. However, the body temperature increased transiently (40–41°C) and returned to normal after 2–3 days. Only one sheep showed a loss of appetite.

thumbnail
Table 2. Results of biochemical identification in the 14-DPI group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.t002

Illumina deep sequencing and read mapping

Nine RNA samples from lung tissues of Bashbay sheep were found suitable for sequencing (S1 Table). Over 4.7 × 107 raw sequence reads were obtained with each group (Table 3) and filtered to remove the low-quality data. After quality control, over 4.4 × 107 clean reads were generated.

The percent of valid bases was ≥94.53% for each sample. The Q30 values were between 90.02 and 97.56%, which met the requirement that the sequence Q30 must be over 90%. The results indicated that the error rates for the sequencing data were within the allowed range. The GC content was between 48.50% and 51.50%, showing that the sequence met the analytical requirements.

High-quality clean reads were mapped to the sheep (Ovis aries) genome, and were mainly distributed in the exon regions, followed by the intergenic regions, and intron regions. The range of the total reads that were mapped to the Ovis aries reference genome was between 83.35 and 91.93%, which fulfilled the requirement that the rate of all mapped reads should be more than 70% (S2 Table). In addition, 74.19% to 85.49% of the clean reads that were uniquely mapped to the Ovis aries reference genome met the requirement that the proportion of uniquely mapped reads should be more than 70%. Finally, the proportion of multiply mapped reads was between 6.43% and 9.16%, which met the criterion that the proportion of multiply mapped reads should be less than 10%. The above alignments of the analytical data indicated that these data were suitable for further analysis of DEGs.

Analysis of DEGs

To better understand the biological mechanisms associated with Bashbay sheep infection with MO, it is critical to identify DEGs at different stages. We identified 1048 DEGs at 4 DPI compared to the 0-d group (B-4/0d comparison), 575 of which were up-regulated and 473 were down-regulated, accounting for 54.87% and 45.13% of the DEGs, respectively (Fig 1A). In addition, 2823 DEGs were detected at 14 DPI compared the 0-d group (B-14/0d comparison), 1362 of which were up-regulated and 1461 were down-regulated, accounting for 48.25% and 51.75% of the DEGs, respectively. We identified 732 DEGs between the 14-DPI and 4-DPI groups (B-14/4d comparison), 232 of which were up-regulated and 500 were down-regulated, accounting for 31.69% and 68.31% of the DEGs, respectively. Furthermore, 14 DEGs were closely related with MO infection, encoding proteins that are directly or indirectly involved in host defenses against pathogens (Table 4).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Dynamics of gene expression in Bashbay sheep infected with MO.

(A) Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the host during the infection process. Up, up-regulated DEGs; Down, down-regulated DEGs; Total, total DEGs. (B) Venn diagram of the identified DEGs in the host during the infection process. (C) Hierarchical clustering of DEGs of Bashbay sheep infected with MO in the 4d group as compared to that in the 0d group. The expression levels were visualized using gradient color scheme; the scale from the least abundant to the highest is from -2.0 to 2.0. Green color indicates low expression, and red color indicates high expression of the detected genes. The left vertical axis represents the sample ID. The horizontal axis shows the clusters of samples and the above vertical axis shows the clusters of DEGs. (D) Hierarchical clustering of the DEGs of Bashbay sheep infected with MO in the 14d group as compared to that in the 0d group. (E) Hierarchical clustering of DEGs of Bashbay sheep infected with MO in the 14d group as compared to that in the 4d group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.g001

The DEGs among the different groups are shown in the Venn diagrams (Fig 1B). We found 197, 1548, and 203 unique DEGs by performing the B-4/0d, B-14/0d, and B-14/4d comparisons, respectively. In addition, 822 common DEGs were found between B-4/0d and B-14/0d, 500 common DEGs were found between B-14/0d and B-14/4d, and 76 common DEGs were found between B-4/0d and B-14/4d. Forty-seven DEGs were in common between these groups.

Heatmaps reflecting the expression patterns of host mRNAs were constructed based on the FPKM values. The heatmap representation of DEGs showed that the samples were clustered together at 0 d (badui1, badui2, and badui3), 4 DPI (4d_B1_F5, 4d_B2_F6, and 4d_B3_F1), and 14 DPI (B1_14d_F4, B2_14d_F3, and B3_14d_F2), as shown in Fig 1C–1E. Our data revealed that the samples had a similar transcriptome expression patterns at each stage. Our findings also showed that the physiological status of the selected sheep were similar and that the disease model of M. ovipneumonia was successfully established.

KEGG pathway analysis

To identify biological pathways operating in sheep infected with MO, the KEGG database was used to analyze the DEGs among the different groups. With the B-4/0d comparison, we identified 245 KEGG enrichment items, the top 20 of which showed that the DEGs of sheep infected with MO were related to “antigen processing and presentation,” “endocytosis,” and “oxidative phosphorylation” (Fig 2A). The B-14/0d comparison revealed 287 KEGG enrichment items, the top 20 of which showed that the significantly enriched pathways were related to “adherens junction,” “focal adhesion,” “Wnt signaling pathway,” “Rap1 signaling pathway,” “Ras signaling pathway,” “phagosome,” and “oxidative phosphorylation” (Fig 2B). Additionally, 236 KEGG enrichment items were found with the B-14/4d comparison, the top 20 of which showed that the significantly enriched pathways included “antigen processing and presentation,” “focal adhesion,” “Toll-like receptor signaling pathway,” “complement and coagulation cascades,” and “PPAR signaling pathway” (Fig 2C).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Top 20 KEGG enriched pathways during the infection process.

The x-axis shows the enrichment factor. The y-axis corresponds to the KEGG Pathway. The color of the dot represents the p-value and the size of the dot represents the number of DEGs mapped to the reference pathways. (A) Top 20 enriched pathways in B-4/0d. (B) Top 20 enriched pathways in B-14/0d. (C) Top 20 enriched pathways in B-14/4d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.g002

The “Toll-like receptor signaling pathway” (p = 2.39 E-17) was the top KEGG enrichment item that was mostly related with MO infection (Table 5). Two small pathways (first: LAMP-TLR2/TLR6-MyD88-MKK6-AP1-IL1B; second: LAMP-TLR8-MyD88-IRF5-RANTES) were identified using the KEGG database, indicating that DEGs related with MO infection were mapped to the TLR signaling pathway (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Toll receptor pathway diagram of Bashbay sheep induced by MO.

Red: Up-regulated expression genes; Black: Stable expression genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.g003

thumbnail
Table 5. The KEGG enrichment items most closely related to MO after Bashbay sheep infected with MO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.t005

GO enrichment analysis

GO enrichment analysis, which is an international standardized gene-function classification system, includes three major functional categories, namely biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. GO analysis was performed to detect significantly enriched GO terms for the DEGs. In our study, 1580 GO terms were found when performing the B-4/0d comparison, including 944 biological process terms (59.75%), 395 molecular function terms (25.00%), and 304 cellular component terms (15.25%). We found 4561 GO terms when performing the B-14/0d comparison, which included 3068 biological process terms (67.27%), 969 molecular function terms (21.25%), and 524 cellular component terms (11.48%). We found 833 GO terms were performing the B-14/4d comparison, which included 517 biological process terms (62.06%), 218 molecular function terms (26.17%), and 98 cellular component terms (11.77%). Moreover, the top 10 GO terms for biological processes included “oxidation–reduction process,” “innate immune response,” “inflammatory response,” and “cell surface receptor signaling pathway” with B-4/0d (Fig 4A). The top 10 GO terms for biological processes included “regulation of energy homeostasis,” “siRNA loading on RISC involved in RNA interference,” and “regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity” with B-14/0d (Fig 4B). The top 10 GO terms for biological processes included “positive regulation of monocyte chemotaxis,” “defense response to bacterium,” “positive regulation of inflammatory response,” and “cell growth” with B-14/4d (Fig 4C).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Top 10 enriched gene ontology (GO) biological processes in Bashbay sheep infected with MO.

These differentially expressed genes detected by RNA-Seq were investigated for significantly enriched biological processes (p < 0.01). The left vertical axis represents significance. The horizontal axis shows the GO terms. (A) Top 10 GO terms in B-4/0d. (B) Top 10 GO terms in B-14/0d. (C) Top 10 GO terms in B-14/4d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.g004

The main functional descriptions of GO terms significant enriched for DEGs associated with MO infection in Bashbay sheep were inflammatory responses (p = 9.15E-04), innate immune responses (p = 7.42E-06), and positive regulation of inflammatory response (p = 1.27E-07) (Table 6). The correlation with the innate immune response was higher than with inflammatory reaction at 4 DPI than at 0 DPI, while that of inflammatory reaction decreased at 14 DPI compared to 4 DPI. The most closely related GO term was positive regulation of inflammatory response.

thumbnail
Table 6. The most notable differentially expressed GO enrichment items closely related to MO infection in Bashbay sheep.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.t006

Confirmation of RNA-Seq data by RT-qPCR

To validate the sequencing results, six DEGs (ACYP2, CXCR3, FAM195A, ISG20, RHOD, and BPIFA1) and an internal reference gene (GAPDH) were selected for real-time qPCR analysis. The results of real-time PCR of all the selected genes were in good agreement with the RNA-Seq data, indicating the accuracy and reliability of the RNA-Seq data obtained in this study (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Validation of RNA-seq results by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

(A) Validation of RNA-Seq results by real-time PCR in B-4/0d. (B) Validation of RNA-Seq results by real-time PCR in B-14/0d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.g005

Discussion

In this study, Bashbay sheep were infected with MO, after which MO antibodies were detected in three sheep at 14 DPI and MO was isolated from nasal swabs. Furthermore, biochemical identification results confirmed the biochemical characteristics of MO. These results indicated that the experimental MO infection was successful. In addition, all three sheep in the 4-d group were seronegative, and MO was not isolated from nasal swabs. As reported by Yan et al., this outcome could be explained by the fact that the host did not produce antibodies until 2 weeks after MO infection and did not excrete the etiological agent until 6 DPI [9]. Clinical observations showed that cough and wheezing occurred, and the body temperature increased transiently (40–41°C) in sheep in the 4-DPI and 14-DPI groups. The sheep in the 4-DPI group showed signs of disease (temperature and coughing), but were not positive for MO antibodies and MO was not isolated.

The mechanism of mycoplasma pathogenesis in host is still insufficient. Currently, pathology is thought to mainly stem from damage to the host immune response, caused by mycoplasma infection [2224]. Some studies have shown that a series of inflammatory reactions are caused by mycoplasma infections, owing to their lipid-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs) [2527]. LAMPs may mediate mycoplasma adhesion to the host cell surface, thereby facilitating subsequent host cell entry, leading to the host cell damage and death [28]. Furthermore, most mycoplasma lipoproteins are exposed on its surface. Some lipoproteins and cytosolic proteins of gram-negative bacteria are virulent [29] or the target of antibodies [30]. Therefore, they can affect the host immune system by continuously interacting with cells in the host’s body [31].

It has been reported that LAMPs of M. fermentans (Mfe) or their derivative, macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2 (MALP-2), could interact with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) on the surface of monocytes/macrophages and affect the immune response of the host [32]. In addition, they elicit inflammatory reactions by activating nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1), mediated by myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and Fas-related death domains. Thus, they can induce a variety of proinflammatory cytokines and bioactive substances that are synthesized and secreted by mononuclear macrophages, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, reactive oxygen species, lysosomal enzymes, and nitric oxide [3337]. LAMPs are also capable of inducing apoptosis by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), and other signal-transduction pathways [38,39].

Previous data have shown that TLRs play a crucial role against M. ovipneumoniae infection [40]. It has been reported that mycoplasma are recognized by TLR2, TLR2/TLR4, TLR2/TLR6, and TLR2/TLR4/TLR6 [4144]. Some mycoplasma components, such as the 19-kDa mycobacterial lipoprotein and lipid-associated membrane proteins, are recognized by TLR2 on the surface of macrophages, which secrete cytokines to promote activation of the host immune response. Xiao et al. [45] found that TLR2 and TLR4 were up-regulated in pigs at 28 DPI with M. pneumoniae. Yoshihiro [46] infected porcine alveolar macrophages with M. hyopneumoniae in vitro and found that TLR2 and TLR6 were up-regulated at 48 h after infection. In the present study, TLR2 was up-regulated in B-14/0d (9.81-fold), TLR6 was up-regulated in B-4/0d (1.68-fold) and B-14/0d (1.75-fold), and TLR8 was up-regulated in B-4/0d (1.34-fold) and in B-14/0d (6.41-fold). These results were consistent with those of Liu Xiao and Yoshihiro. However, TLR2 and TLR4 were down-regulated in B-4/0d (0.87 and 0.71-fold, respectively) and TLR4 was down-regulated in B-14/0d (0.92-fold); these results were different from those of Xiao et al. [45]. This discrepancy could have been caused by different mycoplasma strains and host cells, the manner of stimulation, and the duration of infection.

KEGG analysis of Bashbay sheep infected with MO revealed that 14 DEGs were enriched in the TLR signaling pathway (Fig 2C), including IRF7, LOC101114535, CCL5, MAPK10, MAPK8, PIK3R1, FOS, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, MYD88, IRF5, and MAP2K6 (mkk6). MyD88 is one of the most important adaptors in innate immune response-signal pathways mediated by TLRs. The activation and inactivation of several downstream signals related to immunity depend on MyD88 activity [40,47,48]. Data from Lai et al. showed that macrophage accumulation and activation decreased in the lungs of MyD88(−/−) mice and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp) clearance was impaired, indicating that MyD88 is a key signaling protein in the anti-Mp response [49]. Most TLRs can mediate MyD88 activation and induce the activation of transforming growth factor-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MKK6), and subsequently activate the MAPK p38 signaling pathway, which leads to the secretion of IL-1β and other proinflammatory cytokines [50]. The DEG data obtained in the present study showed that MYD88 was down-regulated in B-4/0d (0.85-fold) and was up-regulated in B-14/0d (1.03-fold); MAP2K6 (MKK6) was up-regulated in B-4/0d (2.14-fold) and in B-14/0d (7.37-fold); IL-1β was up-regulated in B-4/0d (2.53-fold) and in B-14/0d (4.55-fold). These results indicate that MO infection should transduce signals and stimulate the host to produce the corresponding cytokines via the LAMP-TLR2/TLR6-MyD88-MKK6-AP1-IL1B pathway. TLRs are pattern-recognition receptors that play important role in early innate immune recognition and host inflammatory response to invasive microorganisms. Gally et al. previously showed that intact TLR2 signaling is critical for host defense-related cytokine production and Mp clearance [51]. Activation of this signal pathway indicates that MO lipoproteins can stimulate TLR2 production in Bashbay sheep, which can induce host production of the defensive cytokine IL-1 and promote MO clearance. This may explain why Bashbay sheep are resistant to MO infection. These results could be helpful in understanding how MO infection progresses in the lung and provide information on key pathways that regulate it.

Several interferon-regulatory factors (IRFs), such as IRF1, IRF3, IRF5, IRF7, and IRF8, are activated downstream of some signaling pathways. In particular, IRF5 regulates the MyD88-dependent TLRs signaling pathway in terms of inflammatory cytokines, which plays a crucial role in promoting inflammatory macrophage polarization and RANTES secretion [5256]. In the present study, IRF5 was up-regulated in B-4/0d (3.20-fold) and B-14/0d (6.33-fold), and IRF7 was up-regulated in B-4/0d (1.50-fold) and B-14/0d (3.09-fold). The term “phagocytosis” was also significantly enriched in the KEGG analysis (Fig 2B). Therefore, another signal-transduction (i.e., the LAMP-TLR8-MyD88-IRF5-RANTES pathway) is important for inducing host cell RANTES secretion, which initiates macrophage phagocytosis of MO.

The stimulation of human lung epithelial NCI-H292 cells with a TLR2 agonist has been reported to increase SPLUNC1 expression in NCI-H292 cells in dose- and time-dependent manners, and to enhance the promoter activity of SPLUNC1 [57]. Gally et al. used gene-knockout technology to produce SPLUNC1 gene-deficient mice [58]. The levels of Mp in SPLUNC1−/− mice increased by three times compared to the levels in wild-type control mice upon infection with Mp. In contrast, mice overexpressing hSPLUNC1 exclusively in airway epithelial cells had three times less Mp compared to that in the control group. These findings demonstrate that SPLUNC1 is essential and plays a vital role in vivo in host defense against mycoplasma infection. In the present study, SPLUNC1 was up-regulated in B-4/0d (1.86-fold) and in B-14/0d (19.72-fold). Moreover, SPLUNC1 expression increased further at later times post-infection.

In summary, we report the results of the comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of Bashbay sheep infected with MO. At 4 or 14 days post-MO infection, two main signal transduction pathways were induced, which stimulated the host to produce the corresponding cytokines (Fig 6). The first signaling pathway was the LAMP-TLR2/TLR6-MyD88-MKK6-AP1-IL1B pathway and the second pathway was the LAMP-TLR8-MyD88-IRF5-RANTES pathway. Our findings should provide a reference for better understanding host–pathogen-interaction mechanisms in general.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Two small pathways in toll receptor pathway induced by MO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.g006

Supporting information

S1 Table. RNA integrity numbers of the different samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Percent of reads uniquely mapped to reference genomes compared to total mapped.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214497.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank all people involved in the sheep-infection study, especially Genqiang Yan for providing us the MO strain. We also thank OE Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for providing technical support.

References

  1. 1. Zarnke RL, Rosendal S. Serologic survey for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in free-ranging dall sheep (Ovisdalli) in Alaska. J Wildl Dis, 1989, 25(4):612–613. pmid:2810563
  2. 2. Rong C, Zhao JM, Hou GY, Zhou HL. Seroprevalence and molecular detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in goats in tropical China. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2014, 46(8):1491–1495. pmid:25099398
  3. 3. Cheng C, Jun Q, Qingling M, Zhengxiang H, Yu M, Xuepeng C, et al. Serological and molecular survey of sheep infected with Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in Xinjiang, China. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2015, 47(8):1641–1647. pmid:26315151
  4. 4. Patel H, Mackintosh D, Ayling RD, Nicholas RA, Fielder MD. A novel medium devoid of ruminant peptone for high yield growth of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. Vet Microbiol 2008, 127(3–4):309–314. pmid:17980518
  5. 5. Xue D, Ma Y, Li M, Li Y, Luo H, Liu X, et al. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae induces inflammatory response in sheep airway epithelial cells via a MyD88-dependent TLR signaling pathway. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2015, 163(1–2):57–66. pmid:25440083
  6. 6. Al-Kaissi A, Alley MR. Electron microscopic studies of the interaction between ovine alveolar macrophages and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in vitro. Vet Microbiol, 1983, 8(6):571–584. pmid:6659313
  7. 7. Rifatbegovic M, Maksimovic Z, Hulaj B. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae associated with severe respiratory disease in goats. Vet Rec 2011, 168(21):565.
  8. 8. Aniwashi J K, Han Yedong, LI Qi, Yidula PNE, XIE Zhuang. The Polymorphic Analysis on Microsatellite Marker and Its Growth Index Association of Bashbay Sheep. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43 (16): 3425–3432.
  9. 9. Yan Wenliang, Fen Guangyun, Lin Chen, Li Yan, Wang Jingmei. Serosurvey of Mycoplasma ovipneumonia in some large scale sheep farms in Xinjiang. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2017,47(6):83–86
  10. 10. Du Zhihui, Shen Wen, Lu Haiyan, Wang Jixue, Yang Yi, Sun Yanming. Comparison on Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection between Bashbay Sheep and Their Hybrid. Progress In Veterinary Medicine, 2017,38(01):69–73.
  11. 11. Jiang Fangpei, Shen Wen, HaifuLu Wen Yang, Sun Yanming. Immunomodulatory Effects on ISG15 Protein in Argali crossed Sheep.Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2013,35(11):925–928.
  12. 12. Zhang H, Zhao Z S, Zhao F, YU P. The relationship between MBL genotype and lung histopathologic lesions of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae pneumonia in sheep.Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 34(4): 293–296.
  13. 13. Patel R.K. and Jain M.. NGS QC Toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One, 2012. 7(2): p. e30619. pmid:22312429
  14. 14. Langmead B. and Salzberg S.L., Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods, 2012. 9(4): 357–359 pmid:22388286
  15. 15. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol, 2013,14, R36. pmid:23618408
  16. 16. Anders S., Pyl PT. and Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31(2): 166–169. pmid:25260700
  17. 17. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature protocols, 2012,7, 562–578. pmid:22383036
  18. 18. Anders S. and Huber W. Differential expression of RNA-Seq data at the gene level–the DESeq package. Embl, 2013.
  19. 19. Mao XZ, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, Wei LP. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics, 2005,21: 3787–3793. pmid:15817693
  20. 20. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol, 2010,11: R14. pmid:20132535
  21. 21. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001; 25(4): 402–408. pmid:11846609
  22. 22. Baseman JB, Lange M, Criscimagna NL, Giron JA and Thomas CA. Interplay between mycoplasmas and host target cells. MicrobPathog, 1995,19(2):105–116.
  23. 23. Tully JG, Baseman JB. Mycoplasma.Lancet. 1991,337(8752):1296.
  24. 24. Rawadi G. Mycoplasma fermentans interaction with monocytes/ macrophages: molecular basis. Microbes Infect, 2000,2(8):955–964. pmid:10962279
  25. 25. Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol MolBiol Rev, 1998,62(4):1094–1156.
  26. 26. Zeng YH, Wu YM, Yu MJ. Lipid-associated membrane proteins of Mycoplasma penetrans induce production of proinflammatory cytokines in human monocytic cells. J Microbiol Immunol, 2006, 4(4): 294–299.
  27. 27. Deng ZL, Wu YM, Zeng YH, Chen LL, Yu MJ. Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase was regulated by activating nuclear factor kappaB in mouse macrophages stimulated with Ureaplasmaurealyticum lipid-associated membrane proteins. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2006;46(5):807–811. pmid:17172033
  28. 28. Fleury B, Bergonier D, Berthelot X, Peterhans E, Frey J, Vilei EM. Characterization of P40, a cytadhesin of Mycoplasma agalactiae. Infect Immun, 2002,70(10):5612–5621. pmid:12228289
  29. 29. Szczepanek SM, Frasca S Jr, Schumacher VL, Liao X, Padula M, Djordjevic SP, et al. Identification of lipoprotein MslA as a neoteric virulence factor of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Infect Immun, 2010,78(8):3475–3483. pmid:20515935
  30. 30. Washburn LR, Bird DW, Dybvig K. Restoration of cytoadherence to an adherence-deficient mutant of Mycoplasma arthritidis by genetic complementation. Infect Immun, 2003, 71(2): 671–675. pmid:12540544
  31. 31. Baseman JB, Reddy SP, Dallo SF. Interplay between mycoplasma surface proteins, airway cells, and the protean manifestations of mycoplasma-mediated human infections. Am J RespirCrit Care Med, 1996,154(4 Pt 2):S137–144.
  32. 32. Rawadi G. Mycoplasma fermentans interaction with monocytes/ macrophages: molecular basis. Microbes Infect, 2000,2(8):955–964. pmid:10962279
  33. 33. Rawadi G, Ramez V, Lemercier B, Roman-Roman S. Activation of mitogen- activated protein kinase pathways by Mycoplasma fermentans membrane lipoproteins in murine macrophages: involvement in cytokine synthesis. J Immunol,1998,160(3):1330–1339. pmid:9570551
  34. 34. Zeng YH, Wu YM, Zhang WB, Yu MJ, Zhu CM, Tan LZ. Activation of nuclear factor kappaB and induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase by lipid-associated membrane proteins isolated from Mycoplasma penetrans. Chin Med J (Engl), 2004, 117(7):997–1001.
  35. 35. Nakao Y, Funami K, Kikkawa S, Taniguchi M, Nishiguchi M, Fukumori Y, et al. Surface-expressed TLR6 participates in the recognition of diacylatedlipopeptide and peptidoglycan in human cells. J Immunol, 2005,174(3):1566–1573. pmid:15661917
  36. 36. Muhlradt PF, Kiess M, Meyer H, Submuth R, and Jung G. Isolation, structure elucidation, and synthesis of a macrophage stimulatory lipopeptide from Mycoplasma fermentans acting at picomolar concentration. J Exp Med, 1997,185(11):1951–1958. pmid:9166424
  37. 37. Deng ZL, Wu YM, Zeng YH, Chen LL, Yu MJ. Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase induced by lipid-associated membrane proteins of Ureaplasmaurealyticum is regulated by nuclear factor κB-mediated mechanism in murine macrophages. J Microbiol Immunol, 2005,3(4):260–265.
  38. 38. Into T, Shibata K. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1-mediated sustained p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation regulates mycoplasmal lipoprotein- and staphylococcal peptidoglycan-triggered Toll-like receptor 2 signalling pathways. Cell Microbiol,2005,7(9): 1305–1317. pmid:16098218
  39. 39. Into T, Kiura K, Yasuda M, Kataoka H, Inoue N, Hasebe A, et al. Stimulation of human Toll-like receptor(TLR)2 and TLR6 with membrane lipoproteins of Mycoplasma fermentans induces apoptotic cell death after NF-kappa B activation. Cell Microbiol, 2004,6(2):187–199. pmid:14706104
  40. 40. Zarnke RL, Rosendal S. Serologic survey for Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in free-ranging dall sheep (Ovisdalli) in Alaska. J Wildl Dis, 1989, 25(4):612–613. pmid:2810563
  41. 41. Sehenk M, Belisle JT, Modlin RL, et al.TLR2 looks at lipoproteins. Immunity, 2009, 31(6): 847–849. pmid:20064441
  42. 42. Tang Shen. TLR family and its function research progress. Progress in Microbiology and Immunology, 2004,(32)2:42–45.
  43. 43. Sun YL, Fu YQ, Ma HT, LIU CJ, XU F. Pathogens and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in children with congenial heart disease after surgery. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2015,17(11):1204–1209. pmid:26575879
  44. 44. Sussan TE, Gajghate S, Thimmulappa RK, Ma J, Kim JH, Sudini K, et al. Exposure to electronic cigarettes impairs pulmonary anti-bacterial and anti-viral defenses in a mouse model. PLoS One, 2015,10(2):e0116861 pmid:25651083
  45. 45. Xiao Liu, Xiaomin Fang, Xiaolong Zou, Fang Zhao, Gui Meng, Shouwen Ren. Alterrations of toll-like receptor TLR2 and TLR4 and gene expression of proinflammatory factors TNF-a and IL-1β in lungs of swine after Mycoplasma pneumonia infection. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2011,27(6):1305–1309.
  46. 46. Shimoji Yoshihiro, Yamamoto Ryuji, Hamashima Noriyuki, Yoshihara Kazuhiro, Shimoji Yoshihiro, Yamamoto Ryuji, et al. Porcine TLR2 and TLR6 Identification and Their Involvement in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Infection. Journal Interferon Cytokine Research, 2003,(23): 583–590.
  47. 47. Wu Q, Martin RJ, Lafasto S, Efaw BJ, Rino JG, Harbeck RJ, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 down-regulation in established mouse allergic lungs contributes to decreased mycoplasma clearance. Am J RespirCrit Care Med, 2008, 177(7):720–729.
  48. 48. Zuo LL, Wu YM, You XX. Mycoplasma lipoproteins and Toll-like receptors. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2009, 10(1):67–76. pmid:19198025
  49. 49. Lai JF, Zindl CL, Duffy LB, Atkinson TP, Jung YW, Rooijen NV, et al. Critical Role of Macrophages and Their Activation via MyD88-NFκB Signaling in Lung Innate Immunity to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. PLoS ONE, 2010, 5(12):e14417. pmid:21203444
  50. 50. Yin Y, Lu Q, Yan XL.Epidemiology of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae infections. Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, 2016, 54(2):91–93. pmid:26875456
  51. 51. Fabienne G, Maisha N. M, Sean K. S, Stephanie R.C, Hongwei C. Heat Shock Factor 1 protects against lung Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in mice. J Innate Immun, 2012, 4:59–68 pmid:22042134
  52. 52. Honda K, Taniguchi T. IRFs: master regulators of signalling by Toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat Rev Immunol, 2006,6(9):644–658 pmid:16932750
  53. 53. Takaoka A, Yanai H, Kondo S, Duncan G, Negishi H, Mizutani T, et al. Integral role of IRF-5 in the gene induction programme activated by Toll-like receptors. Nature, 2005,434(7030):243–249. pmid:15665823
  54. 54. Krausgruber T, Blazek K, Smallie T, Alzabih S, Lockstone H, Sahgal N, et al. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nat Immunol, 2011,12(3):231–238. pmid:21240265
  55. 55. Krausgruber T, Saliba D, Ryzhakov G, Lanfrancotti A, Blazek K, Udalova IA. IRF5 is required for late-phase TNF secretion by human dendritic cells. Blood, 2010,115(22):4421–4430. pmid:20237317
  56. 56. Saliba DG, Heger A, Eames HL, Oikonomopoulos S, Teixeira A, Blazek K, et al. IRF5:RelA interaction targets inflammatory genes in macrophages. Cell Rep, 2014;8(5):1308–1317. pmid:25159141
  57. 57. Thaikoottathil J, Chu HW. MAPK/AP-1 activation mediates TLR2 agonist-induced SPLUNC1 expression in human lung epithelial cells. Molecular immunology, 2011,49(3):415–422. pmid:21899893
  58. 58. Fabienne Gally Y. Peter Di, Sean K. Smith, Maisha N. Minor, Yang Liu, Donna L.Bratton, et al. SPLUNC1 promotes lung innate defense against Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in mice. Am J Pathol, 2011, 178(5):2159–2167. pmid:21514430