Figures
Abstract
This study aimed to reveal the specific mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore by moderately thermophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus caldus. The bioleaching performance of blank control (BC), planktonic cell deficient (PD), attached cell deficient (AD), and EPS deficient (ED) systems were compared, to investigate the specific functions of “non-contact” and “contact” (including direct contact and, EPS-mediated contact) mechanisms. The detailed mechanics of bioleaching were studied using μx of cell growth, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The μx of cell growth demonstrated that EPS favors planktonic and attached cell growth. SEM observation revealed that intensive micro-pores on slag benefitted from the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism. XRD identification indicated that additional chemical derivatives were produced via “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism, because of the active iron/sulfur metabolism. FTIR analysis revealed that the absorption peaks of C-O-S, sulfate, and S = O, which are closely associated with sulfur metabolism, have significant influences of EPS secretion. Taken together, the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism contributed to almost half of the “contact” mechanism efficiency and a quarter of the total bioleaching efficiency. The proposed specific mechanism of EPS can deepen our understanding of similar bioleaching processes.
Citation: Feng S, Li K, Huang Z, Tong Y, Yang H (2019) Specific mechanism of Acidithiobacillus caldus extracellular polymeric substances in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0213945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213945
Editor: Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Institute of Materials Science, GERMANY
Received: December 26, 2018; Accepted: March 4, 2019; Published: April 12, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Feng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21606110; 21878128; 21776113; 31530056), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20150133), the funding of Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education (KLIB-KF201504), the funding of Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biotechnology, Ministry of Education (KLCCB-KF201601), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. 111-2-06) and national first-class discipline program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering (LITE2018-23).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
With continuous decline in copper rich ore reserves, reprocessing of low-grade copper-bearing sulfide ores, accounting for >70% of the global copper reserves, has become inevitable [1–3]. However, metal extraction from these low-grade ores using traditional smelting techniques is uneconomical. Therefore, most low-grade ores have been discarded [4–6]. Recently, owing to advantages such as simple operation, low infrastructure investment, and reduction in environmental pollution, bioleaching has become a dominant technology for recycling metal resources from discarded ores, compared with conventional pyrometallurgy [7–12]. However, as a primary sulfide ore, copper-bearing sulfide ore is difficult to dissolve through bioleaching process, due to its complicated composition, passivation effect, and high lattice energy (tetrahedral crystal structure) [2, 5]. Thus, improving the efficiency of copper-bearing sulfide ore bioleaching processes has attracted increasing attention in recent years.
To improve the rate of copper dissolution during bioleaching, it is necessary to gain a greater understanding of bioleaching mechanisms. Several investigations of the processes involved in “contact” and “non-contact” bioleaching mechanisms have proposed models to explain various aspects of the bioleaching process, including adsorption behavior and dissolution kinetics during sulfide ore bioleaching [13–16]. The “contact” mechanism, derived from the adsorption behavior of attached cells and leachates, is a prerequisite for initiating adhesion and subsequent iron/sulfur metabolism [17–19]. The “noncontact” mechanism, on the other hand, operates via with the chemical action of acidic ferric sulfate solutions produced from the bacterial oxidation of ferrous iron, which is normally present in these environments [20]. Recent studies have recognized the important role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in bioleaching, especially at the mineral solution interface. It is well known that bacterial EPS are secreted into the cell envelope. These EPS contain polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids, which are beneficial for biofilm formation [21, 22]. It has been previously suggested that EPS of the iron-oxidizer Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans might combine with Fe3+ and form the complex EPS-Fe3+ compounds [23]. The synthesized and secreted EPS of the mesophilic A. thiooxidans favor a stronger hydrophobic interaction in cell adhesion during bio-oxidative/bioleaching processes [24]. EPS was recognized as the direct evidence of colonization and biofilm formation of the extremely acidophilic archaeon Ferroplasma acidiphilum BRGM4 biofilms during attachment to the cracks/defects of pyrite surfaces [25]. However, the “EPS-mediated” mechanism for coupling with the moderately thermophilic sulfur-oxidizer A. caldus, which is widely recognized as the dominant strain in most bioleaching processes, is sophisticated and has not been completely elucidated thus far.
In the authors’ previous study, A. thiooxidans ZJJN-3 secreted a thick capsule and EPS-like complex, which exhibited good potential for adsorption behavior [26]. The “contact” mechanism was strengthened by the adapted adsorption behavior in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore by A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans [27]. The effects of the “non-contact” mechanism on community structure during chalcopyrite bioleaching by Acidithiobacillus sp. have also been studied [28].
In this study, the typical moderately thermophilic strain-A. caldus was used to investigate the specific mechanisms underpinning the “EPS-mediated contact” in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore. First, the effects of EPS on sulfur/iron metabolism and the μx of cell growth were compared. The effects of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism on ore characteristics, such as slag morphologies, composition, and their complex composition and functional group differences were then investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), respectively. Finally, the contribution of “EPS-mediated” processes to the mechanisms of bioleaching was determined.
Materials and methods
Strain and growth conditions
The typical moderately thermophilic sulfur-oxidizer A. caldus CCTCC M2018054 (16S rRNA gene GenBank number: Z29975) was isolated from the leachate from the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide, in Fujian, China. A. caldus was cultured in modified media from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH. The basal salts of the modified media were listed as follows (in g/L): (NH4)2SO4: 3.0; KH2PO4: 3.0; K2HPO4 ·3H20: 0.5; MgSO4·7H2O: 0.5; KCl: 0.1; Ca(NO3)2: 0.01. The energy substrate consisted of12.5 g/L S0. Trace elements were listed as follows (in mg/L): Na2SO4: 50.0; FeCl3·6H2O: 11.0; H3BO3: 2.0; MnSO4·H2O: 2.0; ZnSO4·7H2O: 0.9; Na2MoO4·2H2O: 0.8; CoCl2·6H2O: 0.6; CuSO4: 0.5; Na2SeO4: 0.1. The above chemicals were purchased from the Sinopharm Group (Shanghai, China). The initial pH of the media was adjusted to 2.0. The strains were adapted by 2.0% w/v low-grade chalcopyrite at 45°C and 170 rpm and were incubated into fresh media once a month.
Ore sample composition and pretreatment
The low-grade copper-bearing sulfide ore was collected from Dongguashan copper mine, Tongling, Anhui, China. The detailed structure and composition of the ore sample were assayed by atomic absorption spectrometry, (Spectr AA-220, Varian, USA), and results are given in Table 1. The ore sample was crushed in a grinding mill (Raymond 3R1410, Jinghua, Weifang, China). The ground ore was sieved through a 300 mesh grid, with a < 48 μm controlling particle diameter. The sieved ore sample was gently washed in a solution of 2 M HCl, distilled water, and pure ethanol to remove surface dust. Finally, the ore sample was dried at room temperature and stored in a vacuum desiccator.
Experimental procedure
Procedure for PD, AD, and ED systems.
Four related bioleaching experiments were designed, as follows: an A. caldus blank control system (BC); an A. caldus planktonic cells-deficient system (PD); an A. caldus attached cells-deficient system (AD); and an A. caldus EPS /attached cells-deficient system (ED). For the PD system, the leachate was allowed to rest without agitation for 1 h and the ore sample was then harvested by centrifugation at 380 × g for 2 min. The planktonic cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 6000 × g for 2 min and discarded. The ore samples were then re-combined with the original bioleaching supernatant free from planktonic cells (PD). Following the above procedures, no cells were counted by microscopy after one additional centrifugation (6000 × g for 2 min), indicating that all free cells in the supernatant had been removed. For the AD experiment, the ore sample was harvested by centrifugation at 380 × g for 2 min. The collected ore was then sterilized by killing attached cells with ultraviolet light for 1 h. The sterilized ore sample without attached cells was then transferred to its original system. For the ED experiment, the leached ore sample was sterilized with ultraviolet light to completely kill the attached cells, in a similar manner to the AD experiment. The ore sample was then suspended in 50 mL of fresh media and 1.0 g of 0.2 mm glass beads was added and agitated with a vortex (lab-dancer, IKA, Germany) for 5 min. The above centrifugation and agitation procedures were repeated. Almost no dissociative DNA remained in the supernatant after these procedures according to previous reports on this method, implying that all EPS and attached cells are removed [29]. The ore sample was then returned to its original bioleaching supernatant. The EPS and attached cells on the ore surface were thus removed completely. The experimental set-up for the four bioleaching systems is presented in Fig 1. The procedure outlined above was performed every two days.
The experimental setup of the different bioleaching procedures designed for this study: A. caldus blank control system (BC); A. caldus planktonic cells-deficient system (PD); A. caldus attached cells-deficient system (AD); A. caldus EPS /attached cells-deficient system (ED).
Bioleaching experiment.
The bioleaching experiments were carried out in 500 mL shaker flasks with 100 mL basal salts media. 2.0 g of low-grade chalcopyrite were added to each flask above the modified growth medium (with 12.5 g/L S0 as additional energy substrate). The initial biomass in each system was controlled at 5.0 × 107 cells/mL after inoculation. The pH was maintained at 1.5 in order to maintain stable cell growth conditions, and was maintained at 1.5 through the use of 6 M HCl every two days. Considering that the excessive sulfate ions may participate in the formation of jarosite precipitate (which influences the later bioleaching and key parameter analysis), 6 M HCl was used to adjust the pH conditions. The bioleaching experiments were carried out at 45°C and 170 rpm. To compensate for daily evaporative loss from the leachate, 2.0 mL of sterile water were supplemented into each system once a day. The length of the whole bioleaching cycle was 30 days.
Analytical methods
Measurement of key chemical parameters.
The pH value was measured using a pH meter (FE28, Mettler, Switzerland). The Eh value was monitored by a Pt electrode (E-431Q, ASI, USA) with a calomel electrode (Hg/Hg2Cl2) as a reference. The concentration of sulfate ions was determined according to the chromic acid-barium colorimetric assay using a spectrophotometer (IV-1100D, Meipuda, China). The copper ion concentration was measured using a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Spectr AA-220, Varian, USA). The ore sample was dried in a vacuum desiccator at 25°C and was then placed on insulated rubber tape for SEM (Quanta-200, FEI, Netherlands) observation of the mineralogical morphology of the residue surface, with a scanning rate set from 300 ns to 30 ns. The leached ore residue was gently washed with deionized water, dried at room temperature, and the dried ore residue was placed in the central hollow of the detection plate. The ore sample was scanned from 3 to 90° with a rate of 4°/min using an XRD (D8, AXS, Germany). The detailed data were then analyzed by the software MDI Jade 6.0 (Materials Data Ltd., USA) with the PDF card library. Approximately 2 mg of dried ore sample and 200 mg of KBr were ground in an agate mortar. A small sample was collected and formed into a thin cylinder shape by a squeezer. The cylinder was measured using an FTIR spectrometer (NEXUS, Thermo, USA), with the wavelengths 400–4000 cm-1 and an accuracy of 0.01 cm-1. The concentration of sulfate ions (in mg/L) was calculated as = 201.6 × OD420 nm− 26.029 (r2 = 0.998). The concentrations of ferrous and ferric ions were measured according to the o-phenanthroline spectrophotometry assay using a spectrophotometer. The concentration of ferrous ions (in mg/L) was calculated as = 5.077 × OD508 nm− 0.0765 (r2 = 0.999), the concentration of ferric ions (in mg/L) was calculated as = 5.102 × OD508 nm− 0.143 (r2 = 0.998) and the concentration of copper ions (in mg/L) was calculated as = 6.852 × λ325 nm− 0.0301 (r2 = 0.999).
Quantification of planktonic, attached, and total biomass.
One milliliter of leachate from the bioleaching process was sampled and centrifuged at 380 × g for 2 min. The supernatant was collected, and the amount of planktonic biomass was measured using an optical microscope at 640 X magnification (Leica, Germany). Meanwhile, 5.0 mL of fresh basal media were added to re-suspend the bottom ore sample. 0.2 g of 0.2 mm glass beads were then added, and the mixture was agitated by a vortex for 5 min. The mixing and centrifugation processes were repeated once, to separate the attached cells from the ore surface. The cells in the supernatant were counted as attached biomass using a single span microscope and total biomass was calculated as the sum of the planktonic cells and the attached biomass.
Results and discussion
Effects of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism on sulfur/iron metabolism and cell growth (μx)
Sulfur/iron metabolisms.
The changes in chemical parameters due to iron/sulfur metabolism, such as the changes in sulfate, ferrous, and ferric ions, are shown in Fig 2. The main biochemical reactions in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore are summarized in Equations (Eq) (1)–(6). Following the adaptive phase, the accumulated granular sulfur on the ore surface began to be oxidized by growing attached cells, as shown in Eqs (4) and (5). The pH therefore decreased and the sulfate ion content gradually increased. In the BC system, sulfur metabolism was active with a better comprehensive bioleaching mechanism, and the value of pH was maintained at about 1.50 in the early phase. Meanwhile, the values in deficient systems greatly fluctuated owing to the release of alkaline substances from the ore and poor sulfur oxidation efficiency. The final values of pH in the different systems were 1.02 (BC), 1.22 (PD), 1.12 (AD) and 1.40 (ED). These results demonstrate the importance of EPS for sulfur oxidation. The highest value of sulfate ion concentration was determined in the ED system (16.40 g/L), compared to 28.60 g/L (BC), 19.46 g/L (PD) and 18.70 g/L (AD) in the other systems. Exopolysaccharides have been recognized as essential to the granular sulfur oxidation process by A. thiooxidans [30]. These EPS transitioned from passive or inactive phases (containing CuS and Sn2−) to active phases (containing increasing amounts of S0) on chalcopyrite surfaces. In the PD system, due to the lack of planktonic cells, the soluble intermediate sulfur (SxOny) could not be oxidized, which resulted in inactive sulfur metabolism. In the AD system, the granular sulfur on the ore surface could not be used by attached cells and therefore formed the S0 passivation layer, inhibiting subsequent sulfur oxidization. Additionally, the final values of Eh in deficient systems (485–501 mV) with an inactive iron/sulfur ion level were slightly lower than those in the BC system (523 mV). The bioleaching efficiency of chalcopyrite by thermophiles (Acidianus brierleyi, Sulfolobus metallicus and Metallosphaera sedula) is closely associated with the redox status fluctuation [31].
(A): pH; (B): Eh; (C): Sulfate ions; (D): Ferrous ions; (E): Ferric ions; (F) Planktonic and attached biomass; (G) μx of planktonic and attached cells. Note: the pH of leachate during bioleaching was measured before the pH-1.5 adjustment by 6 M HCl every two days.
The sulfur metabolism and iron metabolism interacted with each other, as shown in Eqs (1)–(4). The highest concentrations of ferrous ions in each system (in g/L) were 1.20 (BC), 0.35 (PD), 0.30 (AD) and 0.27 (ED). It has been reported that the adsorption behavior of attached cells in the early stage is beneficial to further concentrate ferric ions and attack sulfide ore, as shown in Eq (1) [20]. The concentration of ferrous ions showed the greatest reduction, reaching 77.5%, in the attached cells /EPS-deficient system. Similarly, the sulfur metabolism of another mesophilic sulfur-oxidizer, A. thiooxidans, was more significantly influenced by attached cells, compared to the iron/sulfur-oxidizer, A. ferrooxidans [27]. Ferric ions showed a similar trend to that of ferrous ions. The highest concentrations of ferric ions (in g/L) in each system reached 0.97 (BC), 0.70 (PD), 0.56 (AD) and 0.35 (ED). It has been noted that the additional ferric ions accelerate the EPS adhesion process owing to the stronger electrostatic interaction by the mesophilic A. ferrooxidans [32]. These results indicate that the “EPS-regulated mechanism” of adsorption behavior was favorable for enhancing iron metabolism. A detailed comparison of key biochemical parameters between the different systems is presented in Table 2.
Biomass and μx of cell growth.
A deficiency in planktonic cells, attached cells or EPS, significantly influences the planktonic and attached biomass (Fig 2D). Compared to 4.36 × 108 cells/mL of planktonic biomass measured in the BC system, the planktonic biomass in the AD and ED systems was greatly reduced to 3.48 × 108 and 2.02 × 108 cells/mL, respectively, indicating the strong microbial cooperation between the planktonic population and the attached population. The “contact” mechanism was inhibited and fewer energy substrates and nutrients, necessary for cell growth, were released. Sulfur granules were primarily oxidized to an intermediate form, such as , with the assistance of adsorption behavior [2,17]. The reduced and soluble sulfur were then completely used up via a “non-contact” mechanism. In contrast, the attached biomass measured in the PD system was 0.58 × 108 cells/mL, even higher than that of the BC system (0.51 × 108 cells/mL). The reason for this is thought to be that attached cells can directly obtain energy substrate and nutrients from the ore. Moreover, without the competition from planktonic cells, all released energy substrate or nutrients from the “contact” mechanism were available for growth of the attached cells. These data are consistent with the changes in chemical parameters, which also indicated a stronger requirement for EPS and attached cells by A. caldus.
The μx of attached and planktonic cells were significantly influenced by the absence of planktonic cells, attached cells and EPS (Fig 2D). The μmax of planktonic cells in the ED system was reduced from 0.52 d-1 to 0.37 d-1 (AD) and 0.32 d-1 (ED), while the μmax of attached cells was also reduced from 0.51 d-1 to 0.23 d-1 (PD). More attached cells adsorbed to the ore surface with a stronger adsorption performance due to the mediating role of EPS, resulting in abundant nutrients becoming available for cell growth. Moreover, timing of the peak μmax was clearly delayed in the absence of EPS. The μmax of planktonic cells was tested after 7.67 days in the BC system and 8.91 days in the ED system. The peak time for attached cells was 12.10 days in the BC system, which was similar to that for the PD system (11.87 d). The kinetics data were consistent with the above results for attached biomass, with all the results supporting the importance of the role of EPS in the improvement of planktonic and attached cell growth of A. caldus.
Effects of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism on ore morphology
To better understand the mineralogical effect of EPS, the morphologies of residues in the different bioleaching systems were observed by SEM (Fig 3). The morphological differences in the mineral residues between normal and deficient systems were found to be significant. In the BC system, intensive adsorption sites such as rills and micro-pores appeared on the ore surface, implying a stronger “contact” mechanism. Sulfur-oxidizers such as the mesophilic A. thiooxidans generally show a greater dependence on these for their adsorption behavior, as most of their main energy source (S0) is generated on the ore surface [28]. Interestingly, the size of the micro-pores was found to be similar to the cell size of A. caldus when observed using TEM (Transmitted Electron Microscopy) techniques (1.8–2.0 μm in length and 0.5–0.7 μm in width). In addition, TEM observation indicated that there was a clear EPS layer wrapped around the A. caldus cells, indicating a stronger effect of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism. It has been reported that the accumulation of slimy and soft EPS in Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans biofilms stimulated adsorption behavior onto pyrite surfaces [33]. Moreover, due to the active chemical ion status, additional unknown derivatives were also produced and spread over the ore surface. In the PD system, due to the absence of planktonic cells, the cell growth of A. caldus only depended on the adsorption behavior of attached cells. The granular sulfur, which could not be completely utilized without attached cells, gradually accumulated on the ore surface. This conclusion was supported by the examination of the XRD patterns of the residues. In the AD system, the mineral surface was smoother and jarosite precipitation was minor. Owing to the absence of attached cells, the “contact” mechanism was greatly inhibited and there was insufficient energy substrate (ferrous ions) released from the ore for cell growth. Jarosite precipitation has been recognized as a major bottleneck in the later stage of the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfides [23, 34]. The cleanest morphology was observed in the ED system, indicating from a different perspective, the importance of EPS for adsorption behavior.
Morphological surface differences of the ore samples between the different bioleaching systems: (A): BC; (B): PD; (C): AD; (D) ED. The slag was dried at room temperature in a vacuum desiccator and observed via scanning electron microscopy at 10× k magnification (bar, 5 μm, 10× k).
Effects of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism on ore components
XRD analyses were performed to investigate the composition of ore samples in the different bioleaching systems (Fig 4). According to the XRD patterns, the main components were CuFeS2, KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, S, Fe7S8, Fe3O4, FeS2, and CaSO4·2H2O. In the BC system, the CuFeS2 peaks were wide, indicating the likely deformation of the crystalline structure during bioleaching. The assistance of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism accelerated iron/sulfur metabolism and produced more crystal forms [1,23]. In conjunction, large quantities of granular sulfur were not apparent in the XRD patterns, indicating complete utilization by attached cells. Higher temperatures increased the mass transfer rate during bioleaching by the moderately thermophilic A. caldus, which supports the improved efficiency in oxidizing S0 membranes [1,12]. In the PD system, the CuFeS2 peak remained high, which could be interpreted as incomplete dissolution of the ore during this bioprocess. In the AD system, the FeS2 peak was significant, indicating a less active iron/sulfur metabolism owing to the deficiency of attached cells. In contrast, there were relatively large amounts of precipitates such as jarosite and S0 in the residues of the deficient systems. It has been reported that, to some extent, elemental sulfur is generally coupled with amorphous iron or other oxy-hydroxides [23]. Meanwhile, the CaSO4·2H2O peak was significant in the PD and AD systems. Additionally, the presence of other unknown minor peaks in the analyses of these precipitates were speculated to be due to previous washes with deionized water prior to XRD detection. It can be interpreted that the XRD patterns of the solid residues indicate that the abundant inorganic ions and microbial organic complexes in the bioleaching systems contributed to more complicated derivatives [27]. The XRD analysis of the residues was consistent with the biochemical and photomicrograph analyses described above.
C:CuFeS2; S:Sulfur; H: Fe2O3; I: Fe(OH)3; K: Fe3(SO4) 4; R: FeSO44; J: KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6; M: H: Fe3O4.
Effects of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism on functional groups
The functional groups of the ore in the infrared spectrum region were analyzed by FTIR analysis (Fig 5). The main absorption bands were 500, 680, 830, 1,000, 1,200, 1,600, 2,300, and 3,400 cm-1. In the BC system, the absorption band was complex owing to the presence of additional derivatives. It has been reported that the functional groups of A. caldus, such as S = O, -OH, -NH2, C = O, C-O, and -CONH2, are closely associated with the process of adsorption behavior [21]. The absorption peak at approximately 680 cm−1 was especially evident, while the single absorption peak around 1,000–1,100 cm−1 was split into two peaks. These absorption peaks are greatly influenced by variations in the performance of the sulfate ion or S = O. It has previously been reported that various intermediate metabolites, such as were produced during the oxidization process of the sulfur granules [6, 17]. In addition, a unique band was located at 830 cm-1, which was caused by C-O-S stretching vibrations. It has been reported that sulfate polysaccharide, another unique component of the bacterial biofilm EPS, is thought to be closely associated with the C-O-S stretching vibrations [33]. Additionally, the asymmetric stretching vibration of C-H and the band of the N-H group might also cause the peak shift around 1,600 and 3400 cm-1 [24]. In the ED system, the absorption peaks around 680 cm-1 and 1,000–1,100 cm-1 became smaller, owing to the inefficient sulfur oxidization caused by the absence of the “contact” mechanism. It has been suggested that several extracellular proteins with abundant thiol groups (Pr-SH) may be directly involved in sulfur activation in A. ferrooxidans by bonding to the elemental sulfur and forming Pr-Sn-SH complexes [32]. The missing absorption peak at 830 cm-1 in the ED system implies that the formation of sulfur-related derivatives such as sulfate polysaccharide (identified by the C-O-S stretching vibration) was greatly inhibited due to the EPS deficiency and inactive sulfur metabolism. In addition, the absorption peaks around 1600 cm-1 and 3400 cm-1, which are closely related to organic metabolism, were observed to have become less distinct owing to the lower organic content associated with poor cell growth.
Efficacy of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism for enhancing copper recovery.
The changes in copper ions in the different systems are shown in Fig 6A. Copper ions were gradually released into the leachate, concurrently with the oxidation of mineral iron and elemental sulfur during bioleaching. The final copper ion concentration in the deficient systems was greatly reduced because of the absence of the “non-contact” mechanism or “contact” mechanism (including the “direct contact” and “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism). The trend of the change was closely consistent with the biochemical parameters described above, which directly proves the function of EPS from the perspective of bioleaching efficiency. For the first time, the detailed contribution of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism to the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore using the moderately thermophilic A. caldus have been revealed, by systematically comparing the bioleaching performance differences between the BC, PD, AD and ED systems. We have shown that 23.91% of the bioleaching efficiency was contributed by EPS (“EPS-mediated contact” mechanism), while 29.64% and 33.79% of bioleaching efficiency were contributed by attached cells (through the “direct contact” mechanism) and planktonic cells (through the “non-contact” mechanism), respectively (Fig 6B). The “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism was responsible for 44.65% of the total efficiency of the “contact” mechanisms. Taken together, there was a close consistency of the copper ion extraction rates shown by the biochemical and mineralogical parameters, supporting the hypothesis that EPS played an important role in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore by the moderately thermophilic A. caldus.
(A): Copper ion; (B): Relative bioleaching efficiencies of different mechanisms.
Overall assessment of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism in copper-bearing sulfide bioleaching
The microenvironments involved in copper-bearing sulfide bioleaching may be divided into the solid-liquid interface and the liquid microenvironments, based on the biochemical reaction site. Attached cells and EPS complexes are apparently mainly active at the solid-liquid interface, while planktonic cells survive in the liquid microenvironment, which is greatly influenced by the former process. The “noncontact” “direct contact” and “EPS-mediated contact” mechanisms were derived from these three different microenvironments for the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore (Fig 7). The comparison of attached cells/EPS on the mineral surface between BC and ED system via confocal laser scanning microscope analysis (CLSM) was presented in Support Information.
The “noncontact” mechanism was performed by planktonic A. caldus cells. Planktonic cells oxidized in solution and released protons, as shown in Eq (5). The protons (H+) are essential for both the sulfur and iron metabolisms, as they attack the ore granules’ surface irregularities and release granular sulfur, as shown in Eq (2) [1, 6]. The protons also oxidize ferrous ions to ferric ions, as shown in Eq 3, and the ferric ions further attacked the ore, as shown in Eq (1). The dissolution of metal sulfides was therefore achieved through a combination of proton attack and ferric ion oxidation processes.
The “direct contact” mechanism was performed by the attached cells. During the sulfur oxidation process, sulfur colloids were oxidized to various intermediate compounds such as [9, 15]. In addition, redundant sulfur gathered as micro-particles (S8) and formed a barrier layer on the ore, blocking access to its surface. This reduced sulfur dissolved into the liquid microenvironment and was oxidized, as shown in Eq (5). The hydrogen ions then entered into the solid-liquid microenvironment and facilitated the “non-contact” mechanism. The reduced sulfur and hydrogen ions in the liquid microenvironment gradually initiated and enhanced the “non-contact t” mechanism [6, 35]. With the assistance of adsorption behavior, more hydrogen ions, ferrous ions, ferric ions, sulfur compounds, and planktonic biomass were generated in the bioleaching system. The biochemical activity of the bioleaching system was directly or indirectly affected by these oxidizing and reducing agents. Thus, to some extent, the adsorption behavior of attached cells acted as an initiator and accelerator of either the iron or sulfur metabolisms.
In the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism coupling with EPS was first assessed from different mineralogical aspects. This mechanism contributed almost half of the “contact” mechanism efficiency and a quarter of the total bioleaching efficiency, indicating its vital role in bioleaching. EPS, which consist of polysaccharides, proteins and nucleic acids, generally serves as the reaction sites on the interface [14, 16]. EPS can help to form biofilms with attached cells, and can also concentrate ferric ions and protons. The EPS thickness and structure regulate the process of the “contact” mechanism. In general, the copper dissolution process takes place at the interface between the EPS and the ore surface. The released ferrous ions dissolve and participate in the ion cycle again, and the jarosite or iron precipitates combine with the EPS layer and act as weak diffusion barriers, interfering with the ion diffusion performance of the EPS layer [34]. In our previous study, with another two species of Acidithiobacillus, A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans d as the model, the rate of EPS-mediated biofilm establishment was continuously enhanced during a directly adapted evolution process, and A. thiooxidans showed a higher dependence on the attached biofilm (contained EPS) mediated “contact mechanism” than that of A. ferrooxidans [27]. It was demonstrated that the adhesion force decreased in case the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) had been removed. L. ferrooxidans exhibits the strongest force of adhesion to chalcopyrite and the largest contact angle, compared to that of A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans [36]. It was also indicated that EPS from another bioleaching microorganism-Acidianus sp. DSM 29099 contains mainly protein and carbohydrate associated with planktonic cell surfaces or associated with biofilms on mineral surfaces, seems to mediate cell-cell and cell pyrite interactions during bioleaching [37]. The comparison between our study and other previous studies is given in Table 3.
Conclusions
The specific mechanism of “EPS-mediated contact” in the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ores by the moderately thermophilic A. caldus was systematically assessed. The “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism has been shown to play a vital role in bioleaching and was responsible for almost half of the “contact” mechanism efficiency and a quarter of the total bioleaching efficiency. SEM observation revealed micropores of a size similar to the cell size on the ore surface, which is considered to have encouraged a stronger “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism. XRD analysis implied that additional chemical derivatives were produced with the assistance of the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism. FTIR analysis indicated that the absorption peaks of the sulfate, C-O-S, and S = O, which are closely associated with sulfur metabolism, were significantly influenced by the presence of EPS. Taken together, our results support the hypothesis that the “EPS-mediated contact” mechanism provides essential support for the bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore by the moderately thermophilic A. caldus. The work reported here may provide the basis for an improved understanding of sulfide ore bioleaching and similar bioprocesses for future research.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. CLSM analysis of attached cells and EPS on the mineral surface under different systems.
BC blank control system; ED EPS deficient system. The leached ore samples were collected at different bioleaching periods. 20 μM SYTO 9 (L13152, Invitrogen, USA) was mixed with the sample (λex: 485 nm and λem: 498 nm) with 200 μg/mL Alexa Fluor 594 ConA (C11253, Invitrogen, USA) (λex: 590 nm and λem: 617 nm). After incubation in the dark for 30 min, the ore sample was collected by centrifugation, washed with 1 mL of PBS solution for 30 min. The treated ore sample was then incubated with PBS solution for 30 min and observed via CLSM (TSC SP8, Leica, Germany).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213945.s001
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Martinez P, Vera M, Bobadilla-Fazzini RA. Omics on bioleaching: current and future impacts. Appl Environ Microviol. 2015; 99(20):8337–8350
- 2. Bobadilla-Fazzini RA, Perez A, Gautier V, Jordan H, Parada P. Primary copper sulfides bioleaching vs. chloride leaching: Advantages and Drawbacks. Hydrometallurgy. 2017; 168:26–31
- 3.
Hernandez S. The World of Copper factbook. International copper study group. 2017; 1–58
- 4. Hallberg KB, González-Toril E, Johnson DB. Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans, sp. nov.; facultatively anaerobic, psychrotolerant iron-, and sulfur-oxidizing acidophiles isolated from metal mine-impacted environments. Extremophiles. 2010; 14:9–19 pmid:19787416
- 5. Ilyas S, Chi RA, Lee JC. Fungal bioleaching of metals from mine tailing. Miner Process Extr M. 2013; 34:185–194
- 6. Panda S, Akcil A, Pradhan N, Deveci H. Current scenario of chalcopyrite bioleaching: A review on the recent advances to its heap-leach technology. Bioresource Technol. 2015; 196:694–706
- 7. Newman DK. Feasting on Minerals. Science. 2010; 327(5967):793–794 pmid:20150475
- 8. Ilyas S, Lee JC, Shin DY, Kim BS. Bio-Hydrometallurgical processing of non-ferrous metals from copper smelting slag. Advanced Materials Research. 2013; 825:250–253
- 9. Mangold S, Harneit K, Rohwerder T, Claus G and Sand W. Novel combination of atomic force microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy for visualization of leaching bacteria on pyrite. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008; 74:410–415 pmid:18039818
- 10. Johnson DB. Biomining goes underground. Nat Geosci. 2015; 8(3):165–166
- 11. Li Q, Ding DX, Sun J, Wang QL, Hu EM, Shi WG, Ma LY, Guo X, Liu XD. Community dynamics and function variation of a defined mixed bioleaching acidophilic bacterial consortium in the presence of fluoride. Ann Microbiol. 2015; 65:121–128
- 12. Smith SL, Johnson DB. Growth of Leptospirillum ferriphilum in sulfur medium in co‑culture with Acidithiobacillus caldus. Extremophiles. 2018; 22:327–333 pmid:29330649
- 13. Crundwell FK. How do bacteria interact with minerals? Hydrometallurgy. 2003; 71(1–2):75–81
- 14. Vera M, Schippers A, Sand W. Progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation-part A. Appl Environ Microviol. 2013; 97(17):7529–7541
- 15. Ilyas S, Kim MS, Lee JC. Integration of microbial and chemical processing for a sustainable metallurgy. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2018; 93(2):320–332
- 16. Zhang S, Yan L, Xing WJ, Chen P, Zhang Y, Wang WD. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and its potential application. Extremophiles. 2018; pmid:29696439
- 17. Schippers A, Sand W. Bacterial leaching of metal sulfides proceeds by two indirect mechanisms via thiosulfate or via polysulfides and sulfur. Appl Environ Microviol. 1999; 65(1):319–321
- 18. Ghauri MA, Okibe N, Johnson DB. Attachment of acidophilic bacteria to solid surfaces: The significance of species and strain variations. Hydrometallurgy. 2007; 85(2–4):72–80
- 19. Ilyas S, Kim MS, Lee JC, Jabeen A, Bhatti HN. Bio-reclamation of strategic and energy critical metals from secondary resources. Metals-Basel. 2017; 7(6):207
- 20. Tan SN, Chen M. Early stage adsorption behaviour of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on minerals I: An experimental approach. Hydrometallurgy. 2012; 119:87–94
- 21. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8(9):623–633 pmid:20676145
- 22. Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14(9):563–575 pmid:27510863
- 23. Peng TJ, Zhou D, Liu XD, Yu RL, Jiang T, Gu GH, Chen M, Qiu GZ, Zeng WM. Enrichment of ferric iron on mineral surface during bioleaching of chalcopyrite. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2016; 26(2):544–550
- 24. Gonzalez DM, Lara RH, Alvarado KN, Valdez-Perez D, Navarro-Contreras HR, Cruz R, Garcia-Meza JV. Evolution of biofilms during the colonization process of pyrite by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Appl Environ Microviol. 2012; 93(2):763–775
- 25. Zhang RY, Bellenberg S, Castro L, Neu TR, Sand W, Vera M. Colonization and biofilm formation of the extremely acidophilic archaeon Ferroplasma acidiphilum. Hydrometallurgy. 2014; 150:245–252
- 26. Feng SS, Yang HL, Wang W. System-level understanding of the potential acid-tolerance components of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans ZJJN-3 under extreme acid stress. Extremophiles. 2015; 19(5):1029–1039 pmid:26264736
- 27. Feng SS, Yang HL, Wang W. Insights into the enhancement mechanism coupled with adapted adsorption behavior from mineralogical aspects in bioleaching of copper-bearing sulfide ore by Acidithiobacillus sp. RSC Adv. 2015; 5(119):98057–98066
- 28. Feng SS, Yang HL, Wang W. Insights to the effects of free cells on community structure of attached cells and chalcopyrite bioleaching during different stages. Bioresource Technol. 2016; 200:186–193
- 29. Gehrke T, Telegdi J, Thierry D, Sand W. Importance of extracellular polymeric substances from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for bioleaching. Appl Environ Microviol. 1998; 64(7):2743–2747
- 30. Lara RH, Garcia-Meza JV, Gonzalez I, Cruz R. Influence of the surface speciation on biofilm attachment to chalcopyrite by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Appl Environ Microviol. 2013; 97(6):2711–2724
- 31. Vilcáez J, Suto K, Inoue C. Bioleaching of chalcopyrite with thermophiles: temperature-pH-ORP dependence. Int J Min Process. 2008; 88:37–44
- 32. Zhang CG, Zhang RY, Xia JL, Zhang Q, Nie ZY. Sulfur activation-related extracellular proteins of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2008; 18(6):1398–1402
- 33. Li Q, Sand W. Mechanical and chemical studies on EPS from Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans: from planktonic to biofilm cells. Colloid Surface B. 2017; 153:34–40
- 34. Yu R., Liu J, Chen A, Zhong DL, Li Q, Qin WQ, Qiu GZ, Gu GH. Interaction mechanism of Cu2+, Fe3+ ions and extracellular polymeric substances during bioleaching chalcopyrite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC2370. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2013; 23(1):231–236
- 35. Africa CJ, van Hille RP, Harrison STL. Attachment of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum ferriphilum cultured under varying conditions to pyrite, chalcopyrite, low-grade ore and quartz in a packed column reactor. Appl Environ Microviol. 2013; 97(3):1317–1324
- 36. Harneit K, Goksel A, Kock D, Klock JH, Gehrke T, Sand W. Adhesion to metal sulfide surfaces by cells of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy. 2006; 83:245–254.
- 37. Zhang RY, Neuc TR, Blanchard V, Vera M, Sand W. Biofilm dynamics and EPS production of a thermoacidophilic bioleaching archaeon. New Biotechnol. 2019;51:21–30.
- 38. Devasia P, Natarajan KA. Adhesion of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to mineral surfaces. Int J Miner Process. 2010; 94:135–139.
- 39. Zeng WM, Qiu GZ, Zhou HB, Peng JH, Chen MA, Tan SN, Chao WL, Liu XD, Zhang YS. Community structure and dynamics of the free and attached microorganisms during moderately thermophilic bioleaching of chalcopyrite concentrate. Bioresource Technol. 2010; 101(18):7068–7075.
- 40. Zhu JY, Li Q, Jiao WF, Jiang H, Sand W, Xia JL, Liu XD, Qin WQ, Qiu GZ, Hu YH, Chai LY. Adhesion forces between cells of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans or Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and chalcopyrite. Colloid Surface B. 2012; 94:95–100.