Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Biogeography of the endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodiniaceae) community associated with the brooding coral Favia gravida in the Atlantic Ocean

  • Mariana M. Teschima ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mari_teschima@yahoo.com.br

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Amana Garrido,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Alexandra Paris,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Departamento de Biologia Marinha, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Flavia L. D. Nunes,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratoire d’Ecologie Benthique Côtière (LEBCO), DYNECO, Ifremer Centre Bretagne, Plouzané, France

  • Carla Zilberberg

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

    Affiliations Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, Instituto Coral Vivo, Parque Yayá, Santa Cruz Cabrália, Bahia, Brazil

Correction

4 Apr 2019: Teschima MM, Garrido A, Paris A, Nunes FLD, Zilberberg C (2019) Correction: Biogeography of the endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodiniaceae) community associated with the brooding coral Favia gravida in the Atlantic Ocean. PLOS ONE 14(4): e0215167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215167 View correction

Abstract

Zooxanthellate corals live in symbiosis with phototrophic dinoflagellates of the family Symbiodiniaceae, enabling the host coral to dwell in shallow, nutrient-poor marine waters. The South Atlantic Ocean is characterized by low coral diversity with high levels of endemism. However, little is known about coral–dinoflagellate associations in the region. This study examined the diversity of Symbiodiniaceae associated with the scleractinian coral Favia gravida across its distributional range using the ITS-2 marker. This brooding coral endemic to the South Atlantic can be found across a wide range of latitudes and longitudes, including the Mid-Atlantic islands. Even though it occurs primarily in shallower environments, F. gravida is among the few coral species that live in habitats with extreme environmental conditions (high irradiance, temperature, and turbidity) such as very shallow tide pools. In the present study, we show that F. gravida exhibits some degree of flexibility in its symbiotic association with zooxanthellae across its range. F. gravida associates predominantly with Cladocopium C3 (ITS2 type Symbiodinium C3) but also with Symbiodinium A3, Symbiodinium linucheae (ITS2 type A4), Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C130, and Fugacium F3. Symbiont diversity varied across biogeographic regions (Symbiodinium A3 and S. linucheae were found in the Tropical Eastern Atlantic, Cladocopium C1 in the Mid-Atlantic, and other subtypes in the Southwestern Atlantic) and was affected by local environmental conditions. In addition, Symbiodiniaceae diversity was highest in a southwestern Atlantic oceanic island (Rocas Atoll). Understanding the relationship between corals and their algal symbionts is critical in determining the factors that control the ecological niches of zooxanthellate corals and their symbionts, and identifying host-symbiont pairs that may be more resistant to environmental changes.

Introduction

The relationship between corals and their intracellular symbiont dinoflagellates (family Symbiodiniaceae) is essential for the survival of shallow water corals and, consequently, the entire coral reef system. Because of this symbiotic relationship, corals can thrive in low-nutrient tropical waters as the endosymbiontics community provides most of the coral host’s metabolic energy requirements, enhancing calcification rates and coral growth [1]. Symbiodiniaceae is a diverse family with different genera, species and strains having different physiologies, photosynthetic efficiencies, and habitat associations [24]. Previous phylogenetic studies based on a number of molecular markers have identified nine major ‘Symbiodinium’ clades assigned alphanumeric nomenclature (A–I) [5], followed by recent taxonomic revision which recognizes the clades as genera and has named them accordingly [6]. Endosymbiontics dinoflagellates are found across a wide range of hosts (e.g., tridacnids, cardiids, sponges, and soft corals [7]), with the genera Symbiodinium Hansen & Daugbjerg 2009, Breviolum Parkinson & LaJeunesse 2018, Cladocopium LaJeunesse & Jeong 2018, Durusdinium LaJeunesse 2018, Fugacium LaJeunesse 2018, and Gerakladium LaJeunesse 2018 (formerly Clades A, B, C, D F and G, respectively) found associating with corals [8]. Symbiodiniaceae have primarily been identified and described using molecular phylogenetics based on the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2 rDNA) [2,6,9]. Further sampling and advances in Symbiodiniaceae taxonomy has the potential to reveal additional species and new genera.

The association pattern between symbionts and their coral host depends on a variety of factors including, among others, coral species, light exposure, depth, irradiance, host transmission strategy, and symbiont availability in the water column [10]. Many generalist interactions can occur and it is possible for a single colony to harbor different symbiont types [11]. Conversely, specificity between coral host and its symbiont have also been described [12]. The physiological features of each host and symbionts, as well as their composition, are relevant in determining the presence and/or abundance of a specific partner combination [2,11,13]. The diversity of coral-zooxanthellae associations may play an important role in assisting corals to endure environmental changes. Because generation times are shorter for endosymbiotic dinoflagellates than corals, symbionts are likely to adapt more quickly and facilitate the adaptation of corals [4,14]. Moreover, some endosymbionts have been shown to help the host coral acclimate to rising seawater temperatures and survive bleaching events [1416]. Because temperature anomalies are predicted to occur more frequently and intensely, understanding the diversity of symbionts in various coral hosts is critical to predict the fate of corals under the threat of global climate change.

The diversity of Symbiodiniaceae-coral associations is well documented in the Indo-Pacific and the Caribbean regions. However, little is known about the diversity of host-symbiont associations in corals from the South Atlantic Ocean and how they may vary across environments. Favia gravida Verrill, 1868 is a brooding coral that can be found across the South Atlantic Ocean [17]. The species is commonly found in shallow water reefs and tide pools [17] and, together with Siderastrea stellata Verrill, 1868, is the most common species found in the shallows. The species is able to survive under extremely harsh conditions including intense solar radiation and high temperatures, although loss of symbionts has been observed during massive coral bleaching events [18]. The distribution of F. gravida encompasses three marine biogeographic regions: Tropical Southwestern Atlantic (SWA), St Helena and Ascension Islands in the Mid-Atlantic(MA), and the Gulf of Guinea in the Tropical Eastern Atlantic (TEA) [19]. The SWA has a high percentage of endemic coral species [20] and the MA islands, while low in coral richness, can play an important role as stepping stones to reef species crossing the Atlantic [21]. Additionally, the TEA corals do not form true coral reefs as the SWA ones do and their species diversity is low, primarily owing to upwelling events and cooler waters in combination with high volumes of fresh water entering from rivers and heavy rainfall [22]. The Gulf of Guinea is important for its coral fauna and accounts for most of the coral diversity in the TEA, but little is known of its host-symbiont associations [22].

To date, no studies have been published with respect to Symbiodiniaceae from the Gulf of Guinea. In the MA, symbiont diversity have been described associated with zoanthids in Ascension Island [23] and with a sea anemone in St Helena Island [24]. Along the SWA coast, some biogeographical barriers seem to exist for Symbiodiniaceae species and the diversity of three different genera is partitioned by environmental variables: Symbiodinium spp. correlates with high irradiance, Breviolum spp. with low temperatures, and Cladocopium spp. with high turbidity [25]. To our knowledge, only two other studies have examined Symbiodiniaceae–coral associations in the SWA, but they were each restricted to two sampling sites. Siderastrea sp. from northeast Brazil associated with different lineages, mostly from Cladocopium spp. (C1, C3, and C46) but also with Breviolum B5 [26], whereas Mussismilia spp. Ortman, 1890 associated with Symbiodinium linucheae (Trench & Thinh) LaJeunesse, 2001 (ITS2 type A4), Breviolum B19, and Cladocopium C3 [27]. Different host taxa including zoanthids and sea anemone from the SWA coast have also been found associated with Symbiodinium microadriaticum Freudenthal, 1962 (ITS2 type A1), S. linucheae, Breviolum B1 and B2, and Cladocopium C1 [24,28,29]. Even though the association between the sister species Favia fragum (Esper, 1795) and its algal symbionts has been examined in the Caribbean [10], no studies have investigated the endosymbionts diversity and distribution in F. gravida.

In this study, we characterized the diversity of the endosymbiotic dinoflagellates associated with the scleractinian coral F. gravida across its distributional range in the South Atlantic. We examined (i) whether any specificity was observed in the F. gravida-symbiont association; (ii) whether new endosymbionts lineages were identified in the South Atlantic; (iii) whether F. gravida harbored different Symbiodiniaceae communities across its range.

Materials and methods

Sampling sites and collection

Samples of Favia gravida (< 1 cm²) corals were collected between February 2004 and July 2017, despite the difference between collected years no anomalies (e.g. higher water temperature or coral bleaching) were recorded during sampling. Collection encompass 12 locations in the South Atlantic Ocean (S1 File), specifically in the SWA: Ceará (CE), Rocas Atoll (RA), Fernando de Noronha Island (FN), Rio Grande do Norte (RN), Paraíba (PB), Pernambuco (PE), Alagoas (AL), Porto Seguro (PS), Abrolhos (AB), Trindade Island (TR); in the MA: Ascension Island (ASC); and in the TEA: São Tomé Island (ST). Permission to collect coral samples was approved by IBAMA (permits 22387–2, 02001.005656/2005-57, 968–1, 29953–2, 29687–4), Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente de Porto Seguro (10/2015), and IDEMA (24/2016) in Brazil, Direcção das Pescas in São Tomé & Príncipe (CITES 139/DP/ME/05) and Conservation Department, Ascension Island Government (CITES 01/16). Small fragments of colonies were collected by scuba diving or snorkeling using a hammer and chisel. The number of colonies sampled per site ranged from 5 to 35 depending on the coral’s abundance at each site (Table 1). Samples were stored in CHAOS solution (4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.1% N-lauroylsarcosine sodium, 10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol) at 4°C until analyzed.

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of samples information: All sampled sites, number of samples per site, endosymbionts identified, depth, date, season of sampling, and GenBank code.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213519.t001

DNA extraction, 28S RFLP and ITS2 sequencing

DNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation as described by Fukami et al. [30] and resuspended in Milli-Q water with RNase A (10 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

To check for the absence of Symbiodiniaceae genera mixture, screening by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was performed by amplifying the large subunit ribosomal gene (28S rDNA), using the primers D1D2 Zoox F (5’–CCT CAG TAA TGG CGA ATG AAC A–3’) and D1D2 Zoox R (5’–CCT TGG TCC GTG TTT CAA GA–3’) [31], under the following conditions: 5 min at 94°C followed by a pre-cycle of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 56°C and 45 s at 72°C, and 29 cycles of 1 min at 92°C, 1 min at 56°C and 45 s at 72°C followed by 10 min at 72°C. Restriction digestions were performed by incubating 3 μL of the amplified product with 10 U of restriction enzyme Taq I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 65°C overnight. Digested fragments were separated by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel, visualized under UV light, and compared with digest patterns from monoclonal cultures of Symbiodinium sp., Breviolum sp., Cladocopium sp. and Durusdinium sp., kindly donated by Dr. Mark Warner (University of Delaware, DE, USA). If a single clade were found in a sample, the ribosomal internal transcript spacer 2 region (ITS2 rDNA) was amplified, using the ITSint-for2 (5’–GAA TTG CAG AAC TCC GTG–3’) [32] and ITS2-rev (5’–GGG ATC CAT ATG CTT AAG TTC AGC GGG T–3’) primers [33], and sequenced. PCR conditions followed those of LaJeunesse and Trench [32] with a touchdown amplification protocol, starting with: 5 min at 94°C, 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 62–52°C (starting at 62°C and decreasing one degree every two cycles until 52°C), and 30 s at 72°C. Next, the reaction continued for an additional 20 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 52°C, 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were visualized by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Sequencing was performed on successfully amplified and purified PCR products in the forward direction using an ABI 3500 genetic analyzer with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Samples with more than one clade on RFLP screening or with additional unidentified bands were cloned using the CloneJET PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with competent E. coli DH5α transformed using TransformAid Bacterial Transformation Kit (Thermo Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Each transformed sample was plated in two Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates and kept at 37°C overnight for the growth of bacterial colonies. At least 48 clones were isolated from the growth plates and stored at −80°C in a clone library arrayed on a 96-well plate with 200 μl of liquid LB medium with 30% glycerol. Amplification reactions and sequencing of at least 16 clones from each sample using the ITS2 rDNA primers were performed as described above to identify dominant Symbiodiniaceae lineages. Only dominant haplotypes identified by bacterial cloning were included in the downstream analyses to avoid an overestimation of biodiversity due to cloning artifacts and/or intragenomic ITS2 variation [34,35].

DNA sequencing and analysis

Sequence chromatographs were manually checked and edited using the Geneious R11 software (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). To ascertain that recovered sequences were from Symbiodiniaceae and to determine which genera they belonged to, BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) searches were performed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. When a Symbiodiniaceae genera or species was identified in our samples (BLAST parameters: query cover 99–100%, E value ≤ 0.01, identity ≥ 98%), sequences from that particular species/lineage were downloaded from the NCBI database and aligned with the ones from this study using ClustalW alignment in Mega 7 software [36] for the phylogenetic and phylogeographic analyses. Samples number decreased from collection to identification because of unsuccessful results during the process (PCR failure and unclear sequencing electropherograms).

For Cladocopium spp., ITS2 sequences were obtained from GenBank for C1, C3, and C130, which were found to be similar to our sequences run through BLAST. Cladocopium C81, which has been found in association with the sister host species F. fragum, was chosen as the outgroup. For Symbiodinium spp., sequences for Symbiodinium A3 and S. linucheae were obtained from GenBank and S. microadriaticum was used as the outgroup. Lastly, GenBank sequences of Fugacium F3 were used for phylogenetic analysis with F. kawaguttii Trench & Blank, 2000 (ITS2 type F1) as the outgroup. Bayesian and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were reconstructed separately for each clade using MrBayes 3.2.6 software [37] and PhyML platform [38], respectively. The best model of sequence evolution for the dataset was determined by the AIC criterion using jModelTest 2 [39]. The Bayesian analysis was run for two million generations and sampled every 1,000 generations with four chains, the minimum chain length required for the average standard deviation of split frequencies to reach a value of 0.01, and a burn-in of 0.25. The heuristic search option for the maximum-likelihood trees was subtree pruning and regrafting with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The phylogenetic tree for each Symbiodiniaceae genera was edited using FigTree 1.3.1 [40]. For the phylogeographic analysis, haplotype networks were constructed for each genera using the median-joining method in PopArt software [41,42]. Identical haplotypes were excluded from phylogenetic analyses but were kept for haplotype networks. Sequences from GenBank of the same ITS2 lineage found in this study were included in the haplotype network to compare their geographic distributions.

Results

Most RFLP analyses followed a pattern found for major Symbiodiniaceae genera by Baker and Rowan [43]. In addition, sequencing data supported the RFLP results, which indicate that RFLP was a good general predictor for dominant endosymbionts in this study. Only four sites (RA, FN, RN, and PS) had samples with unclear RFLP patterns for which cloning was required. Bacterial cloning of PCR products revealed that, in most cases, RFLP patterns that did not clearly match an expected single-clade pattern were caused by incomplete digestion by the restriction enzyme. Nearly all corals examined harbored a single symbiont type. Only coral samples from the RA had mixtures of different Symbiodiniaceae genera in the same colony (one colony each hosted S. linucheae/Fugacium F3 and S. linucheae/Cladocopium C1, respectively).

Cladocopium C3 was the most prevalent species (61.6%, N = 106) found in association with F. gravida (Fig 1). This endosymbiont was identified in coral samples collected from eight of 12 sampling sites, all in the SWA. Cladocopium C1 was identified in samples from the SWA and MA and was the second most common subtype, accounting for 20.3% (N = 35) of all samples. S. linucheae was identified in coral samples from the SWA and TEA and was the third most dominant subtype associated with F. gravida (13.4%, N = 23). The other endosymbionts identified in this study (Symbiodinium A3, Cladocopium C130, and Fugacium F3) combined accounted for less than 5% (N = 7) of all coral samples.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Sampling sites and geographic distribution of dominant endosymbiotic dinoflagellates associated with Favia gravida in the Southern Atlantic Ocean.

Numerals inside the circles indicate the number of colonies found associated with the respective endosymbiont lineages. Tropical Eastern Atlantic: ST = São Tomé; Mid-Atlantic: ASC = Ascension Island; Southwestern Atlantic: CE = Ceará, RA = Rocas Atoll, FN = Fernando de Noronha, RN = Rio Grande do Norte, PB = Paraíba, PE = Pernambuco, AL = Alagoas, PS = Porto Seguro (Bahia), AB = Abrolhos (Bahia), and TR = Trindade Island.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213519.g001

Coral samples from the MA region harbored exclusively lineage Cladocopium C1, whereas colonies collected from the TEA only hosted Symbiodinium A3 and S. linucheae. Symbiodiniaceae diversity was highest in the SWA: five lineages (S. linucheae, Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, Cladocopium C130, and Fugacium F3) were found either alone in one coral colony or two lineages combined (Figs 1 and 2). Even though the SWA covers a larger latitudinal range, encompassing most of the distributional range of F. gravida on this side of the Atlantic, one-half of the sampling sites had only one dominant Symbiodiniaceae lineages. Multiple dominant endosymbionts were found in two of seven coastal sites and all three oceanic islands in Brazil. In addition, Cladocopium C3 was not identified in corals from only two coastal sites in the SWA (PB and AL). As mentioned above, corals harboring mixed endosymbionts lineages were only found in the RA. Symbiodiniaceae diversity was highest in the RA where Cladocopium C3 and S. linucheae were dominant, accounting for 75% (N = 9) of samples, whereas Fugacium F3 was the least abundant, found only in one sample co-occurring with S. linucheae.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Proportion of each Symbiodiniaceae lineages per depth at sampling sites with more than one subtype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213519.g002

The lineages Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, and S. linucheae were the most abundant in the six sampling sites where more than one endosymbiont lineage was identified (Fig 2). Six different endosymbionts lineages were found in reefs from 0–2 m habitats while only three were found in reefs from 4–13 m sites. Cladocopium C3 was the only subtype identified in samples from CE, AB, RN, and PS, despite larger sample sizes in AB (N = 22) and PS (N = 31) (Fig 1). Additionally, either Cladocopium C1 and/or Cladocopium C3 were identified in corals collected from all sites except ST and AL. AL was undersampled and more data would be needed to confirm this pattern. Cladocopium C130 was only identified from corals collected from PB.

The phylogenetic trees of Symbiodinium spp. and Cladocopium spp. (Fig 3A and 3B) support the identification of Symbiodinium A3, S. linucheae, Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, and Cladocopium C130. The KP134444 sequence from a Symbiodinium sp. hosted by zoanthids in Brazil previously identified as belonging to Symbiodinium A3 by Rabelo et al. [29] clustered with S. linucheae sequences in our analysis (Fig 3A). Even though Symbiodinium A3 sequences grouped with S. tridacnidorum Lee, Jeong, Kang & LaJeunesse, 2015 (ITS2 type A3 from the Pacific) we decided to keep it as Symbiodinium A3 because there is a discussion about Symbiodinium A3 from the Atlantic being a different species [6]. Similarly, all Cladocopium C1 sequences included in our analyses clustered with C. goreaui (Trench & Blank, 2000) and Cladocopium C3 sequences clustered with C. thermophilum, (Hume, D’Angelo, Smith, Stevens, Burt & Wiedenmann, 2015) the only Cladocopium species described for now. However Cladocopium is the most diverse genus in Symbiodiniaceae and distinct species may yet be described within the group (ITS2 types) [44]. Given current taxonomic uncertainty within the group, we maintain a conservative assignment at the genus level. Symbionts from the South Atlantic identified as Fugacium grouped with Fugacium F3 from GenBank. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis of published sequences and data from this study show more than one well supported clades within Fugacium F3 found across all hosts (Fig 3C).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on Symbiodiniaceae ITS2 sequences of Cladocopium spp.

(a), Symbiodinium spp. (b), and Fugacium spp. (c). Posterior probability distributions and bootstrap values of 1,000 replicates from maximum-likelihood analysis are shown for branch support. GenBank accession numbers are indicated on the tree. Sampling site abbreviations from this study are explained in Fig 1. Colors represent biogeographic regions: dark green = Northwestern Atlantic, light green = Caribbean, black = Southwestern Atlantic, pink = Mid-Atlantic, yellow = Tropical Eastern Atlantic, blue = Red Sea, red = Pacific Ocean, and orange = Indian Ocean.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213519.g003

The Symbiodinium spp. haplotype network showed that F. gravida samples collected in our study from the TEA and SWA shared the same S. linucheae haplotype, which has also been identified in samples from the Northwestern Atlantic and the Caribbean (Fig 4A). As mentioned before, Symbiodinium A3, within our dataset, was only identified in samples from ST. For this lineage one haplotype is exclusive to our ST samples and another is in common to the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean (Fig 4B). Cladocopium C1 and C3 haplotypes differ by a single nucleotide (Fig 4B). The most common Cladocopium C1 haplotype found in this study (SWA and MA) has been previously identified in samples collected from the Pacific Ocean but it differed from the ones found in zoanthids in the TEA. Additionally, SWA had an exclusive Cladocopium C1 haplotype and the Cladocopium C130 haplotype is common to the SWA and the Indian Ocean. In the case of the Cladocopium C3 (SWA) identified in this study the most common haplotype is identical to samples retrieved from GenBank from the Caribbean, the Oman and Persian Gulfs, and the Pacific Ocean, with the exception of a few haplotypes variants from the oceanic islands of the SWA (FN, RA and TR), which differed from the most common haplotype by one or two bp mutation. Although, Fugacium F3 sequences were more similar to each other than to another Fugacium group, all haplotypes, including ours from the SWA and GenBank sequences from the Pacific were different from one another (Fig 4C).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Median-joining haplotype network of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates Symbiodinium spp.

(a), Cladocopium spp. (b) and Fugacium spp. (c) with sequences from this study and from the GenBank. Black dashes correspond to mutational events.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213519.g004

Discussion

General patterns in the association between Symbiodiniaceae and Favia gravida

In this study, we demonstrate that the scleractinian coral Favia gravida is a generalist host that may harbor Symbiodiniaceae lineages from three different genera and six lineages (Symbiodinium A3 and S. linucheae, Cladocopium C1, C3 and C130, and Fugacium F3). While no new lineages of Symbiodiniaceae were identified, we report on the first occurrence of Cladocopium C130 and Fugacium F3 in the South Atlantic. F. gravida had a stronger association with Cladocopium C3, which was found in nearly 70% of sampling sites, some over 2,200 km apart. Cladocopium C3 is a widely distributed generalist symbiont that has been found in association with a variety of coral species [12,44]. It has been suggested that Cladocopium C1 and Cladocopium C3 may be ancestral stock species within Cladocopium from which other types have been derived [44], which could explain their wide geographical range and association with a wide variety of hosts.

Symbiodiniaceae associations with F. gravida have a discernable biogeographical pattern. The TEA host populations harbor only Symbiodinium and the MA populations harbor only Cladocopium. The SWA corals harbor the highest endosymbionts diversity (Symbiodinium, Cladocopium and Fugacium), with Cladocopium C3 being the most common association. Interestingly, while the sister species F. fragum from the Caribbean associates mostly with Breviolum spp.[10], this symbiont genus was not found in the current study despite intensive sampling. A large amount of Breviolum spp. can be found in the Caribbean as a result of an ecoevolutionary expansion of this genus during Pliocene-Pleistocene [45] probably the physical-environment conditions that propitiated these endosymbionts radiation was not the same in the South Western Atlantic where Breviolum spp. occur but do not seem to stand out.

Symbiodiniaceae diversity by biogeographic region

To our knowledge, this is the first study of coral symbiont algal diversity in the Gulf of Guinea, TEA. At the ITS2 lineage level, the TEA had a higher diversity of Symbiodinium spp. (Symbiodinium A3 and S. linucheae) compared to the SWA (S. linucheae). These two lineages have previously been identified in coral samples collected from the Atlantic, where Symbiodinium spp. seems to be more common relative to the Pacific Ocean [46]. Studies in the Northeastern Atlantic (Madeira Island, Canary Islands, and Cape Verde) with different host groups (corals, sea anemone, and zoanthids) revealed a greater diversity of Symbionidiaceae (Symbiodinium sp., Breviolum sp., Cladocopium sp. and Durusdinium sp.) [47] than the current study, and more specifically the lineages Breviolum B1 [24], Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, Cladocopium C21 [48], and Cladocopium C46 [26]. Even though F. gravida is a generalist host, it was only found associated with the genus Symbiodinium in the Gulf of Guinea. Additional studies with other reef-building corals and host taxa in the TEA, particularly in São Tomé, are needed to further characterize the Symbiodiniaceae diversity of this region.

Endosymbionts diversity was the lowest in the MA, where only Cladocopium C1 was identified compared to three lineages of Cladocopium found in the SWA (Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, and Cladocopium C130). Two studies from the MA showed a low diversity of symbionts, namely one Cladocopium C1 and Breviolum B1 each associated with zoanthids [23] and a sea anemone [24], respectively. In our study, F. gravida samples from the MA were collected in semi-enclosed tide pools infrequently connected to the sea and possibly exposed to air at low tide [17]. Thus, salinity, temperature, and other environmental parameters in those sites must be more extreme than subtidally, and Cladocopium C1 may be able to tolerate a wide range of conditions perhaps by the presence of protective compounds such as UV-blockers [49], even though we expected to find members of Symbiodinium in ASC as observed in other shallow sites. Juveniles of the common Indo–Pacific coral Acropora tenuis (Dana, 1846) were found to have much greater thermal tolerance when associated with Cladocopium C1 [50]. Moreover, in Australia Cladocopium C1 occurs in shallower, high-irradiance habitats and was found to be substantially more heat tolerant than Cladocopium C3 [44]. Alternatively, because ASC is a remote oceanic island, symbiont diversity may be intrinsically low. In fact, a report on the Zoantharia fauna of ASC found that two zoantharian species, Palythoa caribaeorum (Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1860) and Palythoa aff. clavata (Duchassaing, 1850), were in association exclusively with only one symbiont species, Cladocopium C1 [23]. Again, the MA is a poorly sampled area and additional studies at a broader scale with a larger number of taxa are needed to characterize the existing Symbiodiniaceae diversity of the MA islands.

In the SWA, a variety of endosymbionts lineages have been identified associated with corals, zoanthids, and sea anemone (e.g., Symbiodinium A3, S. linucheae, Breviolum B1, Breviolum B5, Breviolum B19, Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, Cladocopium C46; [24,2629]). In the current study, F. gravida colonies collected from the SWA were found associated with subtypes S. linucheae, Cladocopium C1, and Cladocopium C3, in addition to two new occurrences, Cladocopium C130 and Fugacium F3. Also, we believe that the Symbiodinium previously identified as Symbiodinium A3 by Rabelo et al. [29] was misidentified. The phylogenetic analysis presented in Rabelo et al. [29] only included Symbiodinium A3. However, when sequences from other Symbiodinium lineages are included, as presented here, phylogenetic analysis of all SWA sequences formed a single cluster with S. linucheae (including the sequence from Rabelo et al. [29]). Thus, current available data and analyses do not support the presence of Symbiodinium A3 in the SWA.

Higher symbiont diversity found in the SWA compared to the TEA and MA could be in part explained by the higher sampling effort on the SWA. Nevertheless, greater symbiont diversity is observed in the oceanic islands of SWA compared to the TEA and MA, supporting the interpretation of greater symbiont diversity in the SWA. In fact, coral populations from RA harbored the highest symbiont diversity in our study, represented by three Symbiodiniaceae genera and four lineages. Similar results were reported for genus Siderastrea Blainville, 1830 symbionts sampled in eastern compared to western Atlantic [26]: Siderastrea spp. from Cape Verde (TEA) harbored only one endosymbiont lineages, whereas up to five lineages were found in Northwestern Atlantic (NWA) corals. Coral species in the genus Oculina Lamarck, 1816 from the NWA also harbored greater symbiont diversity in a study that surveyed Symbiodiniaceae communities from the Caribbean and the Mediterranean [51]. Thus, the Western Atlantic appears to possess a higher diversity of symbionts compared to the TEA and MA, and possibly the Mediterranean as well. The greater symbiont diversity of the Western Atlantic may be explained by the previous connectivity between the Atlantic and Pacific prior to the closure of the Isthmus of Panama, the shifts in climate conditions that favored the diversification of Symbiodiniaceae following this event during the Pliocene, and its greater diversity and availability of habitats [44,45].

Biogeography of marine organisms in the South Atlantic shows a general trend of greater diversity in the SWA. However, patterns of species diversity in the TEA and the MA varies according to taxonomic group, such that for some groups of organisms, there is greater similarity between MA and SWA (e.g. reef fishes [52] and zoantharians [23]) and for others, that MA is more similar to the TEA (e.g reef fishes [21] and marine invertebrates [53]). According to our observations for Symbiodiniaceae, MA shares one symbiont lineage with SWA and none with TEA. In this case, MA is more similar to SWA than TEA. Conversely, a global study of the sea anemone Exaiptasia pallida (Agassiz in Verrill, 1864) [24] showed that it harbored Breviolum B1 in Brazil, Canary, Madeira and St Helena islands, indicating that the endosymbiotic dinoflagellates are able to disperse across the Atlantic. Thus, specific local conditions may impact the host-symbiont association but not the dispersal ability of Symbiodiniaceae in the Atlantic.

Symbiodiniaceae distribution in the Southwestern Atlantic (SWA)

Corals often show preference for a particular symbiont type but new combinations can be formed in response to changes in local physical environmental conditions [54,55]. In the SWA, Cladocopium C3 (the most prevalent in the region) and S. linucheae were found concomitantly in most sites comprised by a variety of habitats. However, S. linucheae was more prevalent in tide pools or shallow reefs than deeper reefs. Symbiodinium spp. is known to synthesize mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), which naturally absorb UVA radiation [56] thereby protecting the holobiont symbionts in high-irradiance habitats. Additionally, Symbiodinium spp. can assimilate more inorganic nitrogen than members of Cladocopium spp. and increase the metabolic activity of their hosts [57]. An alternative explanation for the higher prevalence of S. linucheae in shallow waters is that members of Symbiodinium spp. are opportunistic or parasitic symbionts [8]. High temperatures can be harmful to corals [14], tide pool corals exposed to acute thermal stress may become more susceptible to bleaching or disease, resulting in the proliferation of opportunistic symbionts in health-compromised corals.

Three Symbiodiniaceae genera have been identified in association with the endemic reef-building coral Mussismilia hispida (Verrill, 1901) along the SWA coast [25], interestingly, the endosymbiont distributional pattern was very different from that of F. gravida, even for samples collected at the same site. Even though the two species can co-occur, they usually occupy different habitats in the reef: F. gravida corals are found preferentially in very shallow waters up to 5 m, especially in tide pools, whereas M. hispida is often found below 3‒5 m. Additionally, the endosymbionts associated with M. hispida were found to clearly exhibit a latitudinal gradient that correlates with temperature and turbidity and closely follows the distribution of reef corals in the SWA, but a similar pattern was not found for the endosymbionts in F. gravida. While only members of Symbiodinium were found associated with M. hispida in the northeast coast of Brazil [26], five lineages from three different genera (Symbiodinium, Cladocopium, and Fugacium) were identified in F. gravida samples in our study. Similarly, symbiont diversity in Siderastrea spp. from PB on the northeast coast of Brazil was higher than in most sites in the Caribbean [26]. In the current study, PB exhibited high symbiont diversity and one lineage (Cladocopium C130) was found exclusively at this site. In fact, this coastal site was among the richest in terms of endosymbionts diversity associated with F. gravida (this study) and Siderastrea spp. [26] with three and four lineages being observed, respectively. Host-symbiont associations in the northeast coast of Brazil may be influenced by environmental conditions, host specificity, ecological parameters, and a combination of these factors and further studies are needed to address their relationships.

To date, only Cladocopium spp. (F. gravida, Cladocopium C3; Siderastrea spp., Cladocopium C1 and Cladocopium C46; M. hispida, Cladocopium sp.) have been observed in Bahia, northeast Brazil (PS and AB in this study). The coast of Bahia receives large amounts of terrigenous sediments (40‒80%) and the Abrolhos Bank, in particular, is described as having sedimentation rates up to 10 mg cm² day1, which is the maximum estimated limit for corals which are not subject to stresses from human activities [58]. This factor could explain the predominance of Cladocopium genus in Bahia, since the presence of Cladocopium C3 symbionts is often observed in environments with lower irradiance level [44] and correlated with turbidity in the SWA [25]. Although S. linucheae was previously recorded in the region in association with Mussismilia braziliensis (Verrill, 1868) [27], the coral sample was collected in the outer reefs of Abrolhos, three times further from the coast than PS, and where waters are likely to be less turbid. In Rio Grande do Norte (RN), where corals are also highly affected by terrestrial sediments [20], Cladocopium C3 was the only endosymbiont found in samples of F. gravida. Another possible explanation for the predominance of Cladocopium C3 in the northeast coast of Brazil is the development of a host-specialist Cladocopium C3 lineage for F. gravida as it occurred in other Caribbean corals hosts species [44]. A phylogenetic study using a highly variable marker (e.g., psbA) is needed to verify the existence of other lineages of Cladocopium genus.

Finally, special attention should be given to the SWA oceanic islands because, unlikely ASC and ST, they showed higher symbiont diversity. One possible explanation for finding more than one lineage of endosymbionts at SWA islands is that these islands served as refuge during low sea-level periods and later became sources for coastal recolonization; this scenario has been proposed to explain the genetic connectivity of M. hispida populations along the SWA coast [59] and may also apply to algal symbionts. Moreover, environmental characteristics particular to each island may help explain their higher symbiont diversity comparing to coastal locations. In our study, endosymbionts diversity in F. gravida was highest in coral samples from the RA. This oceanic island, the only atoll in the South Atlantic, is subject to daily tidal influence (0–3.8 m), whereby some pools become shallower at low tide with corals exposed to air, high temperatures and irradiance. Additionally, the atoll is comprised by two main pool habitats: open pools, which are permanently connected to the open ocean and more exposed to wave action; and closed pools, which remain isolated at low tide [60]. In the RA, higher diversity of endosymbionts was found in closed pools (S. linucheae, Cladocopium C1, Cladocopium C3, and Fugacium F3), whereas only Cladocopium C1 and Cladocopium C3 were found in open pools, suggesting that differences in physical environmental conditions (e.g., temperature and turbidity) help shape the association between F. gravida and their algal symbionts. Moreover, this is the first report on the occurrence of Fugacium sp. in the South Atlantic, which is not usually found in association with scleractinian corals. This endosymbiont genus is commonly found in foraminiferans hosts [61], although it is predominantly found in association with the scleractinian coral Alveopora japonica Eguchi, 1968 in temperate environments of the northwestern Pacific Ocean [62]. The physiological and ecological importance of Fugacium F3 for F. gravida remains unclear as it was found in only one colony mixed with S. linucheae. Besides, the large amount of differences between haplotypes of Fugacium F3 from this study and from the Pacific suggested that the lineage found in the SWA may be distinct than the others found in the Pacific. The other colony with mixed algal populations (S. linucheae/ Cladocopium C1) was also collected from the RA. The environmental variability described above may have contributed to this finding. Coral samples from the other SWA oceanic islands (FN and TR) harbored at least two different symbionts lineages, but S. linucheae was rare (< 10% of samples). Environmental factors may be the major determinants of symbiont diversity in FN and TR: both islands have a variety of habitats ranging from tide pools to 30 m deep reefs and FN is subjected to different wind and wave conditions depending on the period of the year and windward vs leeward sides of the island [63].

In conclusion, Symbiodiniaceae diversity associated with F. gravida was higher in the SWA compared to the TEA and MA. This coral host is generalist, which could be advantageous in case of a bleaching event, since different symbionts could assist the coral recovery. Additionally, distinct symbiotic algae (S. linucheae, Cladocopium C1 and Cladocopium C3) found in association with F. gravida are exposed to high temperatures and irradiance (tide pools) showing several endosymbionts resistant to harsh environmental conditions. Finally, the first occurrence of Cladocopium C130 and Fugacium F3 for the South Atlantic highlights the need for further studies in the region.

Supporting information

S1 File. Detailed description of the 12 collection sites of Favia gravida in the South Atlantic.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213519.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Projeto Coral Vivo, Sisbiota-Mar, MS Barbeitos, R Cordeiro, AS Freire, N Le Dantec, GO Longo, K Nickols and C Perez for their help collecting coral samples. We also would like to thank M Klautau, C. Lazoski, M. Menezes, and P. Salomon for reading earlier drafts. This manuscript is part of the Doctorate Degree requirements of Mariana M. Teschima at the Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPGBBE/UFRJ).

References

  1. 1. Muller-Parker G, D’Elia CF, Cook CB. Interaction between corals and their symbiotic algae. In: Birkeland C, editor. Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Springer; 2015. pp. 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7249-5
  2. 2. LaJeunesse TC. Investigating the biodiversity, ecology, and phylogeny of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium using the ITS region: in search of a “species” level marker. J Phycol. 2001;37: 866–880.
  3. 3. Stat M, Loh WKW, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Carter DA. Symbiont acquisition strategy drives host-symbiont associations in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs. 2008;27: 763–772.
  4. 4. Blackall LL, Wilson B, van Oppen MJH. Coral—the world’ s most diverse symbiotic ecosystem. Mol Ecol. 2015;24: 5330–5347. pmid:26414414
  5. 5. Pochon X, Gates RD. A new Symbiodinium clade (Dinophyceae) from soritid foraminifera in Hawai’i. Mol Phylogenet Evol. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;56: 492–497. pmid:20371383
  6. 6. LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, et al. Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol. Elsevier Ltd.; 2018;28: 1–11.
  7. 7. Carlos AA, Baillie BK, Kawachi M, Maruyama T. Phylogenetic position of Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) isolates from tridacnids (Bivalvia), cardiids (Bivalvia), a sponge (Porifera), a soft coral (Anthozoa), and a free-living strain. J Phycol. 1999;35: 1054–1062.
  8. 8. Stat M, Morris E, Gates RD. Functional diversity in coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105: 9256–9261. pmid:18591663
  9. 9. Trench R. Validation of some currently used invalid names of dinoflagellates. J Phycol. 2000;36: 972.
  10. 10. Finney JC, Pettay DT, Sampayo EM, Warner ME, Oxenford HA, LaJeunesse TC. The relative significance of host–habitat, depth, and geography on the ecology, endemism, and speciation of coral endosymbionts in the genus Symbiodinium. Microb Ecol. 2010; 250–263. pmid:20502891
  11. 11. Rowan R, Knowlton N, Baker AC, Jara J, Mensing S. Landscape ecology of algal symbionts creates variation in episodes of coral bleaching. Nature. 1997;388: 265–269. pmid:9230434
  12. 12. LaJeunesse TC, Bhagooli R, Hidaka M, Done T, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK. Closely related Symbiodinium spp. differ in relative dominance in coral reef host communities across environmental, latitudinal and biogeographic gradients. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;284: 147–161.
  13. 13. Knowlton N, Rohwer F. Multispecies microbial mutualisms on coral reefs: the host as a habitat. Am Nat. 2003;162.
  14. 14. Hume BCC, Voolstra CR, Arif C, D’Angelo C, Burt JA, Eyal G, et al. Ancestral genetic diversity associated with the rapid spread of stress-tolerant coral symbionts in response to Holocene climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113: 4416–4421. pmid:27044109
  15. 15. Jones AM, Berkelmans R, Van Oppen MJH, Mieog JC, Sinclair W. A community change in the algal endosymbionts of a scleractinian coral following a natural bleaching event: field evidence of acclimatization. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;275: 1359–1365. pmid:18348962
  16. 16. Grégoire V, Schmacka F, Coffroth MA, Karsten U. Photophysiological and thermal tolerance of various genotypes of the coral endosymbiont Symbiodinium sp. (Dinophyceae). J Appl Phycol. 2017;29: 1893–1905.
  17. 17. Hoeksema BW. Extreme morphological plasticity enables a free mode of life in Favia gravida at Ascension Island (South Atlantic). Mar Biodivers. 2012;42: 289–295.
  18. 18. Soares M de O, Rabelo EF. Primeiro registro de branqueamento de corais no litoral do Ceará (NE, Brasil): Indicador das mudanças climáticas? Geociências. 2014;33: 1–10.
  19. 19. Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Davidson N, Ferdaña ZA, Finlayson M, et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience. 2007;57: 573–583.
  20. 20. Leão ZMAN, Kikuchi RKP, Ferreira BP, Neves EG, Hilda H, Maida M, et al. Brazilian coral reefs in a period of global change: A synthesis. 2016;64: 97–116.
  21. 21. Floeter SR, Rocha LA, Robertson DR, Joyeux JC, Smith-Vaniz WF, Wirtz P, et al. Atlantic reef fish biogeography and evolution. J Biogeogr. 2008;35: 22–47.
  22. 22. Polidoro BA, Ralph GM, Strongin K, Harvey M, Carpenter KE, Arnold R, et al. The status of marine biodiversity in the Eastern Central Atlantic (West and Central Africa). Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2017;27: 1021–1034.
  23. 23. Reimer JD, Lorion J, Irei Y, Hoeksema BW, Wirtz P. Ascension Island shallow-water Zoantharia (Hexacorallia: Cnidaria) and their zooxanthellae (Symbiodinium). J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2014;97: 695–703.
  24. 24. Grajales A, Rodríguez E, Thornhill DJ. Patterns of Symbiodinium spp. associations within the family Aiptasiidae, a monophyletic lineage of symbiotic of sea anemones (Cnidaria, Actiniaria). Coral Reefs. 2016;35: 345–355.
  25. 25. Picciani N, Seiblitz IG de L e, Paiva PC de, e Castro CB, Zilberberg C. Geographic patterns of Symbiodinium diversity associated with the coral Mussismilia hispida (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) correlate with major reef regions in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016;163: 236.
  26. 26. Monteiro JG, Costa CF, Gorlach-Lira K, Fitt WK, Stefanni SS, Sassi R, et al. Ecological and biogeographic implications of Siderastrea symbiotic relationship with Symbiodinium sp. C46 in Sal Island (Cape Verde, East Atlantic Ocean). Mar Biodivers. 2013;43: 261–272.
  27. 27. Silva-Lima AW, Walter JM, Garcia GD, Ramires N, Ank G, Meirelles PM, et al. Multiple Symbiodinium strains are hosted by the Brazilian endemic corals Mussismilia spp. Microb Ecol. 2015;70: 301–310. pmid:25666537
  28. 28. Costa CFC, Sassi R, Lira KG, LaJeunesse TC, Fitt WK. Seasonal changes in zooxanthellae harbored by zoanthids (Cnidaria, Zoanthidea) from coastal reefs in northeastern Brazil. Panamjas. 2013;8: 253–264.
  29. 29. Rabelo EF, Rocha LL, Colares GB, Bomfim TA, Nogueira VLR, Katzenberger M, et al. Symbiodinium diversity associated with zoanthids (Cnidaria: Hexacorallia) in Northeastern Brazil. Symbiosis. 2014;64: 105–113.
  30. 30. Fukami H, Budd AF, Levitan DR, Jara J, Kersanach R, Knowlton N. Geographic differences in species boundaries among members of the Montastraea annularis complex based on molecular and morphological markers. Evolution (N Y). 2004;58: 324–337.
  31. 31. Zardoya R, Costas E, López-Rodas V, Garrido-Pertierra A, Bautista JM. Revised dinoflagellate phylogeny inferred from molecular analysis of large-subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. J Mol Evol. 1995;41: 637–645. pmid:7490778
  32. 32. LaJeunesse TC, Trench RK. Biogeography of two species of Symbiodinium (Freudenthal) inhabiting the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). Biol Bull. 2000;199: 126–134. pmid:11081711
  33. 33. Coleman AW, Suarez A, Goff LJ. Molecular delineation of species and syngens in volvocacean green algae (Chlorophyta). J Phycol. 1994;30: 80–90.
  34. 34. LaJeunesse TC, Pinzón JH. Screening intragenomic rDNA for dominant variants can provide a consistent retrieval of evolutionarily persistent ITS (rDNA) sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;45: 417–422. pmid:17719244
  35. 35. Thornhill DJ, Lajeunesse TC, Santos SR. Measuring rDNA diversity in eukaryotic microbial systems: How intragenomic variation, pseudogenes, and PCR artifacts confound biodiversity estimates. Mol Ecol. 2007;16: 5326–5340. pmid:17995924
  36. 36. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33: 1870–1874. pmid:27004904
  37. 37. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61: 539–542. pmid:22357727
  38. 38. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and mehtods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 2.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59: 307–321. pmid:20525638
  39. 39. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. JModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 772. pmid:22847109
  40. 40. Rambaut A. FigTree v.1.3.1. [computer program]. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. 2009; 2009.
  41. 41. Leigh JW, Bryant D. POPART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6: 1110–1116.
  42. 42. Bandelt H-J, Peter Forster and AR. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecic phylogenies. Mol Biol. 1999;16: 37–48. pmid:10331250
  43. 43. Baker A, Rowan R. Diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates (zooxantehllae) in scleractinian corals of the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific. Proc 8th Int Corall Reef Symp. 1997;2: 1301–1306.
  44. 44. Thornhill DJ, Lewis AM, Wham DC, Lajeunesse TC. Host-specialist lineages dominate the adaptive radiation of reef coral endosymbionts. Evolution (N Y). 2014;68: 352–367. pmid:24134732
  45. 45. LaJeunesse TC. “Species” radiations of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific since the Miocene-Pliocene transition. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22: 570–581. pmid:15537807
  46. 46. LaJeunesse TC, Loh WKW, Woesik R Van, Hoegh-guldberg O, Gregory W, Fitt WK, et al. Low symbiont diversity in Southern Great Barrier Reef Corals, relative to those of the Caribbean. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48: 2046–2054.
  47. 47. Reimer JD, Hirose M, Wirtz P. Zoanthids of the Cape Verde Islands and their symbionts: previously unexamined diversity in the Northeastern Atlantic. Contrib to Zool. 2010;79: 147–163.
  48. 48. Sweet MJ. Symbiodinium diversity within Acropora muricata and the surrounding environment. Mar Ecol. 2014;35: 343–353.
  49. 49. Liu H, Stephens TG, González-Pech RA, Beltran VH, Lapeyre B, Bongaerts P, et al. Symbiodinium genomes reveal adaptive evolution of functions related to coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Commun Biol. Springer US; 2018;1: 1–11.
  50. 50. Abrego D, Ulstrup KE, Willis BL, van Oppen MJ. Species-specific interactions between algal endosymbionts and coral hosts define their bleaching response to heat and light stress. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2008;275: 2273–2282. pmid:18577506
  51. 51. Leydet KP, Hellberg ME. Discordant coral–symbiont structuring: factors shaping geographical variation of Symbiodinium communities in a facultative zooxanthellate coral genus, Oculina. Coral Reefs. 2016;35: 583–595.
  52. 52. Kulbicki M, Parravicini V, Bellwood DR, Arias-Gonzàlez E, Chabanet P, Floeter SR, et al. Global biogeography of reef fishes: A hierarchical quantitative delineation of regions. PLoS One. 2013;8: e81847. pmid:24386083
  53. 53. Brown J, Downes K, Mrowicki RJ, Nolan EL, Richardson AJ, Swinnen F, et al. New records of marine invertebrates from Ascension Island (central Atlantic). Arquipélago Life Mar Sci. 2016;33: 71–79.
  54. 54. Boulotte NM, Dalton SJ, Carroll AG, Harrison PL, Putnam HM, Peplow LM, et al. Exploring the Symbiodinium rare biosphere provides evidence for symbiont switching in reef-building corals. ISME J. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;10: 2693–2701. pmid:27093048
  55. 55. Quigley KM, Willis BL, Bay LK. Heritability of the Symbiodinium community in vertically-and horizontally-transmitting broadcast spawning corals. Sci Rep. Springer US; 2017;7: 1–14.
  56. 56. Banaszak AT, LaJeunesse TC, Trench RK. The synthesis of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) by cultured, symbiotic dinoflagellates. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2000;249: 219–233. pmid:10841936
  57. 57. Ezzat L, Fine M, Maguer J-F, Grover R, Ferrier-Pagès C. Carbon and nitrogen acquisition in shallow and deep holobionts of the scleractinian coral S. pistillata. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4: 1–12.
  58. 58. Segal B, Castro CB. Coral community structure and sedimentation at different distances. Ecologia. 2011;59: 119–129.
  59. 59. Peluso L, Tascheri V, Nunes FLD, Castro CB, Pires DO, Zilberberg C. Contemporary and historical oceanographic processes explain genetic connectivity in a Southwestern Atlantic coral. Sci Rep. Springer US; 2018;8: 1–12.
  60. 60. Longo GO, Morais RA, Martins CDL, Mendes TC, Aued AW, Cândido DV., et al. Between-habitat variation of benthic cover, reef fish assemblage and feeding pressure on the benthos at the only atoll in South Atlantic: Rocas atoll, NE Brazil. PLoS One. 2015;10: 1–29. pmid:26061735
  61. 61. Baker AC. Flexibility and specificity in coral-algal symbiosis: Diversity, ecology, and biogeography of Symbiodinium. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34: 661–689.
  62. 62. Chang S-J, Rodriguez-lanetty M, Yanagi K, Nojima S, Song J-I. Two anthozoans, Entacmaea quadricolor (order Actiniaria) and Alveopora japonica (order Scleractinia), host consistent genotypes of Symbiodinium spp. across geographic ranges in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. Animal Cells Syst (Seoul). 2011;15: 315–324.
  63. 63. Krajewski JP, Floeter SR. Reef fish community structure of the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago (Equatorial Western Atlantic): The influence of exposure and benthic composition. Environ Biol Fishes. 2011;92: 25–40.