Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Ginsenosides, including protopanaxdiol (PPD) and protopanaxtriol (PPT) type ginsenosides, have been identified as natural insecticidess. This study aimed to investigate the antifeedant and ovicidal activities of total ginsenosides, protopanaxdiol saponins (PDS) and protopanaxtriol saponins (PTS) against Asian corn borer, O. furnacalis (Guenee).
Methods and results
O. furnacalis egg masses (> 40 eggs) at 0-, 1- and 2-day-old were dipped into ginsenosides and egg hatchability was significantly inhibited by total ginsenosides, PDS, and PTS in dose and egg-age dependent manners. 100 mg/ml PDS had the strongest ovicidal activity against 0- (80.58 ± 0.95%), 1- (71.48 ± 5.70%), and 2-day-old eggs (64.31 ± 3.20%). In no-choice and choice feeding tests, we observed that the 3rd instar larvae consumed decreased area of leaves treated with ginsenosides, and the antifeedant activities of total ginsenosides, PDS, and PTS against the 3rd instar larvae were time and dose-dependent, with higher activities at 48 h. 100 mg/ml PDS had relative higher antifeedant activity (88.39 ± 3.43% in no-choice and 80.9±4.36% in choice) than total ginsenosides and PTS at all time intervals, except at 48 h in no-choice test. In further experiments, we found PPD ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) had relative higher time and dose dependent antifeedant activities than PPT ginsenosides (Re and Rg1).
Citation: Liu S, Wang X, Xu Y, Zhang R, Xiao S, Wang Y, et al. (2019) Antifeedant and ovicidal activities of ginsenosides against Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenee). PLoS ONE 14(2): e0211905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211905
Editor: Hua Zhou, Macau University of Science and Technology, MACAO
Received: August 30, 2018; Accepted: January 22, 2019; Published: February 15, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by Natural Science Fund Project of Jilin Province Science and Technology Department (20190201263JC) and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303111). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Ginseng contains about 60 species of triterpene saponins [1]. Saponins of ginseng, or ginsenosides, are secondary metabolites mainly synthetized in Panax ginseng (P. ginseng) [2]. Ginsenosides own various pharmacological properties including neuroprotective [3], anti-inflammatory [4, 5], anti-fatigue [6], antiaging [7], antiallergic [6, 8] and antitumor effects [9–12]. In addition, ginsenosides have been reported to be efficient against pest infestation by by preventing oviposition, feeding behavior and egg hatchability [1, 2, 13, 14].
Ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re and Rg1 are common compounds in P. ginseng ginsenosides, accounting for over 80 percentage of total ginsenosides [15]. Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Rh2 and Rg3 are protopanaxdiol (PPD) type ginsenosides, and Re, Rg1 and Rg2 are protopanaxtriol (PPT) type ginsenosides (Fig 1) [15, 16]. The two type ginsenosides share a common dammarane triterpenoid structure [15]. PPD ginsenosides own two sugar moieties which attach to the β-OH hydroxyl at the C-3 and C-20 positions of PPD. PPT ginsenosides own two sugar moieties which link to the α-OH hydroxyl at C-6 position or β-OH hydroxyl at C-20 position [15, 17]. Previous reports had shown that both panaxadiol saponins (PDS) and panaxatriols saponins (PTS) had low activity [17]. In comparison with PTS (Rg1, Rg2, Re and Rf), PDS (Rg3, Rd, Rc, Rb1, Rb2 and Rh2) shows similar but relative more active roles in anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anti-tumor, and anti-fatigue effect [15, 18–20]. However, some studies showed that PTS had more powerful effect on inhibiting cancer cell invasion than PDS [12]. The effects of different monomers are affected by various conditions, such as temperature or structure [18].
Glc, β-D-glucopyranosyl; Rha, α-L-rhamnopyranosyl; Ara(f), Arabinose (furanose form); Ara(p), arabinose (pyranose form).
Our previous study showed that total ginsenosides from the stems and leaves (GSLS) of P. ginseng showed significant antifeedant activity against Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) [21]. We observed that the administration of GSLS extracted from P. ginseng significantly reducted the activity of acetylcholine esterase (AChE), carboxylesterase (CarE) and glutathione S-transferase (GST), while increased mixed-functional oxidase (MFO) activity in P. xylostella, suggesting the decreasing detoxication capacity in P. xylostella. Other studies also showed the obvious efficient of ginsenosides against pest infestation by influencing feeding behavior of Mythimna separata (M. separata Walker) Larvae [22]and Acyrthosiphon pisum (A. pisum pea aphid)[14], as well as digestive enzymes in M. separata larvae [23] and A. pisum [14]. However, there is less information on the activity of pest ginsenosides against infestation from Ostrinia furnacalis (O. furnacalis).
O. furnacalis is a widely distributed insect serviously threatening the production of maize in Asia [24, 25]. The control of O. furnacalis is very difficult work for agricultural management in Aisa. This study was designed to investigate the antifeedant and ovicidal activities of ginsenosides against O. furnacalis. The influence of series concentrations of ginsenosides were tested on egg hatchability and feeding behavior (in no-choice and choice situations). The antifeedant and ovicidal activities of total ginsenosides from the leaf and stem of P. ginseng, PDS, and PTS against O. furnacalis eggs or the 3rd instar larvae were investigated. This study would provide us with new insights into the insecticidal action of different ginsenosides against O. furnacalis.
Materials and methods
Preparation of total ginsenosides extraction
P. ginseng was grown at ginseng planting base at Fusong, Jilin, China for four years. Prior to the harvest of ginseng, withered leaves and stems were collected, naturally dried, ground into powder, and stored at ambient temperature. Total ginsenosides fromginseng stems and leaves (GSLS) were extracted from the P. ginseng leaf and stem powder using water-refluxing method [26]. About 1.0 kg powder was dissolved into 1 L distilled water and refluxed for 2 hours. Rplicated for 3 times with 500 ml water for each time, merged the extract and then concentrated to a total volume of 280 g. The water extract was then diluted with water (100 g/L) and chromatographed on D101 macroporous resin using water and 75% ethanol. The 75% ethanoleluents were dried and total ginsenosides with purity > 90% (UV) were obtained. For extraction of PDS, total ginsenosides were dissolved in 10% NaOH and re-extrated using butyl ethanol. PDS was extracted from NaOH fraction using ethanol sedimentation, and PTS was extracted from the butyl ethanol fraction with 2% NaOH solution and ethanol sedimentation, respectively. PDS (including Rb1, Rb2, Rb3, Rc, Rd, Rg3 and Rh2) and PTS (including Re, Rf, Rg1 and Rg2) were obtained by passing through ion-exchange resin/silica gel column using n-butanol-ethyl acetate-water solution (4:1:2) and chloroform-methanol-ethyl acetate-water eluention (2:2:4:1), respectively. Standards of ginsenosides, including Rg1 (cat#201511), Re (cat#201523), Rf (cat#201537), Rb1 (cat#201501), Rg2 (cat#201545), Rc (cat#201536), 20(R)Rh1 (cat#201515), Rb2 (cat#201551), Rb3 (cat#201518), F1 (cat#201549), Rd (cat#201579), Rk3 (cat#201562), F2 (cat#201521), Rh4 (cat#201571), Rg3 (cat#201506), PPT, C-K (cat#201520), Rg5 (cat#201524), Rh2 (cat#201543), PPD (cat#201512), PDS (cat#201519), and PTS (cat#201513) were obtained from National ginseng engineering center of Jilin Agricultural University, Jilin, China. The purity (> 95%) of all agents was identified an Agilent series 1260 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Agents were diluted into distilled water to the series concentrations of PDS, PTS (5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 mg/ml) and ginsenosides (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/ml) before experiments.
Insects
The O. furnacalis eggs were obtained from the Institute of Biocontrol, Jilin Agricultural University, China, and maintained in an intelligent artificial climate chamber (PRS-20, Ningbo Saifu Laboratory Instrument Factory, Ningbo, China) at 27 ± 1°C with a relative humidity of 70 ± 5% and a light cycle of 14 h day: 10 h night. Insects were fed with artificial diets for 5 generations with undisturbed mating behavior. The indoor populations of O. furnacalis and their eggs were then subjected to treatments with ginsenosides.
Ovicidal activity bioassay
For ovicidal bioassay, 10 egg masses (≥ 40 eggs in each egg mass) at each age (0-, 1-, and 2-day-old) of the indoor populations of O. furnacalis were immersed into solutions with different concentrations of ginsenosides (0, 5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/ml) for 10 s. After eggs masses were air dried, 10 eggs were placed per 9cm petri dish each containing a moistened filter paper, with 10 replications per treatment. Dishes were incubated in a chamber as described above. The unhatched eggs (unbroken eggs) were counted daily using a Leica binocular microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) until hatching ceased. Control experiments were conducted by dipping egg masses into distilled water for 10 s. Each experiment was repeated for 10 times. The egg hatchability (eggH) was calculated as: eggH(%) = (hatched eggs)×100/total eggs. The ovicidal activity of ginsenoside was repressed by the adjusted inhibition rate of egg hatchability, which was calculated as: Adjusted inhibition rate of egg hatchability(%) = (eggHcontrol—eggHtest)×100/eggHcontrol.
Feeding bioassay
Leaf disc choice and no-choice methods were used to study the larvicidal activity. Fresh maize leaves were collected from ‘Xianyu 335’ at jointing stage. Leaves were imidiately stored at 4°C before experiments. Leaf discs (15 mm in diameter) were dipped into solutions with different concentrations of ginsenosides (0, 5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/ml) for 10 s. Leaf discs dipped into distilled water were used as negative control. The leaf discs were placed on filter papers and air dried. In choice bioassay, 3 test discs and 3 negative control discs dipped into the same solutions were put into one petri dish (9 cm in diameter) with interval [21]. In no choice bioassay, 6 test discs were put into one dish, and dishes with 6 control discs were set as negative controls [21]. Each experiment was replicated for 10 times. The 3rd instar larvae were fasted for 4 h and then evenly placed onto the empty positions of dishes (n = 6 in each dish) with leaf discs. All dishes were maintained in a chamber as described above for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. The remaining area (ReA) of individual leaf disc was determined using a leaf area meter (LI-3000; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Then, the antifeedant activity of ginsenoside against O. furnacalis larvae for choice bioassay was computed as: antifeedant activity(%) = (ReAcontrol—ReAtest)×100/(ReAcontrol + ReAtest), and that for no-choice assay was computed as: antifeedant activity(%) = (ReAcontrol—ReAtest)×100/(ReAcontrol).
It has been reported that Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Re and Rg1 are major compositions (80%) of total ginsenosides [15]. As we described above, Re, Rd, Rg1, Rb3 and Rb1 are major compositions (~ 45%) of GSLS from P. ginseng; PDS was mainly composted of PPD type ginsenosides including Rd, Rc, Rb2, Rb1 and Rb3 [15, 17]; and PTS was essentially consisted of Re, Rg1, and Rg2 (accounting for ~ 55%) [17]. To investigate the reasons causing the difference in antifeedant activity among GSLS, PDS, and PTS, we fed the 3rd instar larvae with leaf discs treated with different active ginsenoside monomers, including PPD ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd) and PPT type ginsenosides (Re and Rg1). Experiments were performed as aforementioned for 10 replications in each condition.
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± SD from 10 replications. Statistical analyses were performed using SPASS 22.0 software. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnet’s test for comparion. Median lethal concentration (LC50) and antifeedant concentration (AFC50) of ginsenosides were calculated using regression analysis. P < 0.05 was set as significant different.
Results and discussion
HPLC analysis of ginsenosides composition
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of GSLS, PDS, and PTS is shown in Fig 2 and Table 1. GSLS from the leaf and stem of P. ginseng is characterized by the presence of 14 compositions, including Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rg2, Rc, Rb2, Rb3, F1, Rd, F2, Rh4, Rg3, C-K, and PPD (Fig 2A and 2B). PDS is characterized by the presence of Rb1, Rb2, Rb3, Rc, Rd, Rg3 and Rh2 (Fig 2C and Table 1), and PTS is characterized by Rg1, Re, and Rg2 (Fig 2D and Table 1), respectively. The major compositions of GSLS from the leaf and stem of P. ginseng are Re (15.59 ± 0.95%), Rd (12.73 ± 0.21%), Rg1 (5.80 ± 0.82%), Rb3 (5.68 ± 0.18%) and Rb1 (5.18 ± 0.07%, Table 1). The major compositions of PDS are Rd (27.8 ± 0.21%), Rb2 (15.81 ± 0.16%) and Rc (9.67 ± 0.29%). PTS is mainly characterized by Re (33.87 ± 0.17%), Rg1 (14.15 ± 0.29%), and Rg2 (7.57 ± 0.16%, Table 1).
a, chromatogram of the 20 standard ginsenosides by HPLC analysis. Number 1–20 indicates composition of Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rg2, Rc, Rb2, Rb3, F1, Rd, F2, Rh4, Rg3, protopanaxatriol (PPT), compound K (CK), Rh1, Rf, and protopanaxadiol (PPD), respectively. Chromatogram of total ginsenosides from stem and leaf of Panax ginseng (b, GSLS), panaxadiols saponins (c, PDS) and panaxatriol saponins (d, PTS).
Our analysis results suggested that there were differences in compositions of GSLS, PDS and PTS, which might suggest the different activities of GSLS, PDS and PTS against O. furnacalis.
Ovicidal activity of GSLS, PDS and PTS against the corn borer eggs
We firstly analyzed the inhibitory effect of GSLS, PDS and PTS against the hatchability of O. furnacalis eggs. Fig 3 shows that all ginsenosides significantly inhibited egg hatchability in a dose-dependent manner. The detail data were listed in S1 Table. After being treated with GSLS (5 ~ 100 mg/ml), the hatchability of eggs at 0-, 1- and 2-day-old was in a range of 71.70% ~ 25.98%, 78.67% ~ 32.69% and 38.61% ~ 82.86%, respectively, which was lower than 96.86% ~ 98.38% of control (Fig 3A–3C and S1 Table). The hatchability of 0-day-old eggs treated by PDS was significantly lower than eggs treated by GSLS and PTS at the same concentration, while that of the 1- and 2-day-old eggs treated by PDS was insignificantly lower than GSLS and PTS (Fig 3A–3C).
a-c, hatchability of O. furnacalis eggs treated with ginsenosides. d-f, ovicidal activity of GSLS, PDS, and PTS against O. furnacaliseggs at 0-day-old, 1-day-old and 2-day-old, respectively. * and ** notes p < 0.05 and 0.01 vs. total ginsenosides (GSLS) in each concentration, respectively. ## indicates p < 0.01 vs. control in Fig 3A–3C. Original data is listed in S1 Table. GSLS, total ginsenosides from of ginseng stems and leaves; PDS, panaxadiols saponins; PTS, panaxatriol saponins.
On contrast, the ovicidal activity of ginsenosides was gradually increased with ginsenoside concentrations (S1 Table and Fig 3D–3F). The ovicidal activity of 100 mg/ml PDS was the highest (80.58±0.95%, 71.48±5.70% and 64.31±3.20%) against O. furnacalis eggs (at 0-, 1- and 2-day-old). We found the ovicidal activity of PDS for 0-, 1-, and 2-day-old eggs was higher than that of GSLS and PTS in each concentration (Fig 3D–3F). These results were consistent with our previous report showing the activity of GSLS against oviposition of Pieris rapae [2]. Our results confirmed the ovicidal activity of GSLS, PDS and PTS against the hatch of O. furnacalis eggs, suggesting that GSLS, PDS and PTS were potential inhibitors of O. furnacalis egg hatch.
Regression analysis showed that PDS exhibited the LC50 values of 23.01 mg/ml, 41.20 mg/ml, and 59.75 mg/ml for ovicidal activity against eggs at 0-, 1-, and 2-day-old, respectively, which was lower than LC50 of GSLS (48.08 mg/ml, 58.78 mg/ml and 71.63 mg/ml) and LC50 of PTS (65.56 mg/ml, 67.29 mg/ml, and 73.99 mg/ml; Table 2) based on confidence intervals. These results suggested that GSLS, PDS and PTS all inhibited the O. furnacalis egg hatchability in dose-dependent manners, and egg age affected the ovicidal activity of ginsenosides. PDS had relative higher ovicidal activity against O. furnacalis eggs at all ages (0 ~ 2-day-old) compared with PTS and GSLS from the leaf and stem of P. ginseng, based on LC50 values and non-overlapping confidence intervals.
Antifeedant activity of GSLS, PDS and PTS against the 3rd instar corn borer larvae
Fig 4 shows the no-choice and choice antifeedant activities of GSLS, PDS and PTS against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis were time and dose-dependent. The consumed leaf area (mm2) was gradually decreased with increased ginsenoside concentrations (S2 and S3 Tables). Larvae that fed on the leaf discs treated with highest ginsenoside concentrations (100 mg/ml) consumed the minimum leaf area, suggesting the highest antifeedant activity of 100 mg/ml ginsenosides against the 3rd instar larvae (Fig 4 and S2 and S3 Tables). In addition, PDS showed higher antifeedant activity than others in the same concentration (S2 and S3 Tables).
a-c, no-choice antifeedant activity of ginsenosides against O. furnacalis larvae for 24 h, 48, and 72 h, respectively. d-f, choice antifeedant activity of ginsenosides against O. furnacalis larvae for 24 h, 48, and 72 h, respectively. * and ** notes p <0.05 and 0.01 vs. GSLS (total ginsenosides from of ginseng stems and leaves) in each concentration, respectively. PDS, panaxadiols saponins; PTS, panaxatriol saponins. Original data of no-choice and choice antifeedant activity analysis are available from S2 and S3 Tables, respectively.
In no-choice assay, GSLS, PDS and PTS showed relative higher antifeedant activity against instar larvae at 48 h than those at 24 h and 72 h. At 48 h, 100 mg/ml GSLS, PDS and PTS exhibited 86.37 ± 2.38%, 88.39 ± 3.43%, and 63.76 ± 3.56% antifeedant activity against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis, respectively. In addition, we found PDS exhibited the highest antifeedant activity against the 3rd instar larvae at all concentrations after 24 h and 72 h, while GSLS showed higher antifeedant activity at 48h than PDS and PTS in all concentration (Fig 4A–4C and S2 Table).
Choice bioassay revealed PDS had the highest antifeedant activity against the 3rd instar larvae in all experiments (Fig 4D–4F). 100 mg/ml PDS showed the highest antifeedant activity of 70.88 ± 2.34%, 80.9 ± 4.36%, and 47.88 ± 4.71% at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, respectively, and those were significantly higher than GSLS and PTS (p <0.05, S3 Table). In no-choice and choice assays, antifeedant activities of ginsenosides were relative lower at 72 h than those at 24 h and 48 h. These results of no-choice and choice bioassays agreed with our previous studies showing the inhibitory activity of GSLS against insect feeding behavior [1, 2, 21]. Previous studies had determined the antifeedant activity of GSLS against the 3rd instar larvae of Pieris rapae [2], the 4th instar larvae of M. separata [1] and Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) [21].
We calculated the choice and no-choice AFC50 of GSLS, PDS and PTS at all time intervals. Regression analysis of no-choice bioassay showed PDS exhibited the lowest AFC50 value of 30.86 mg/ml, 7.06 mg/ml, and 23.61 mg/ml at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, respectively (Table 3). AFC50 values of PTS in choice and no-choice tests were higher than those of GSLS and PDS based on LC50 values.
Taken together, these results revealed that GSLS, PDS and PTS all showed antifeedant activities against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis, and PDS had the highest antifeedant activity. Fresh maize leaf treated with higher ginsenoside concentrations exhibited higher antifeedant activity against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis, suggesting the potential strategies of using ginsenosides for O. furnacalis management.
Antifeedant activity of different ginsenoside monomers against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis
Fig 5 shows the no-choice antifeedant activities of different ginsenoside monomers against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis were gradually increased with the concentrations. The changes of gradually increased antifeedant activities of different ginsenoside monomers were basically similar with small differences and in a dose and time dependent way (S4 Table). All ginsenoside monomers showed relative higher antifeedant activity against O. furnacalis larvae at 48 h, followed by 72 h and then 24 h (Fig 5 and S4 Table). In comparison among monomers, we found Re and Rg1 monomers in the same concentrations showed relative lower antifeedant activities than Rb1, Rb2, Rc and Rd, and the antifeedant activities of Rb1, Rb2, Rc and Rd were at the same level (Fig 5 and S4 Table). Regression analysis showed the AFC50 value of Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re and Rg1 was 0.32 mg/ml, 0.33 mg/ml, 0.45 mg/ml, 0.37 mg/ml, 0.81 mg/ml and 0.64 mg/ml at 48 h, respectively (Fig 6).
a-c, antifeedant activity of different ginsenoside monomers against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. * and ** notes p <0.05 and 0.01 vs. Rb1 in each concentration, respectively. Original data are available from S4 Table.
* and ** notes p < 0.05 and 0.01 vs. Rb1, respectively.
Previous reports had shown that compound K and Rg3 (PPD type) have various pharmacological activities, including anti-tumorigenesis, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective and anti-aging [6, 27–29]. Ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Re and Rd could be converted into pharmacologically active components PPD type ginsenosides compound K and Rg3 during biotransformation [28, 29]. Oh et al reported that PPT and PPD showed comparable anxiolytic effect on rats and the latter showed stronger anti-inflammatory effect than the former [20]. These studies suggested that the diversity biological in activities of ginsenoside are dependent on the structures and biotransformation pathways. These might explain the differences in the ovicidal and antifeedant activities among GSLS, PDS and PTS ginsenosides against O. furnacalis.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our present study determined the insecticidal action of GSLS, PDS and PTS against O. furnacalis in laboratory conditions. We confirmed that the ovicidal activities of ginsenosides GSLS, PDS and PTS against O. furnacalis eggs were dose and egg-age dependent. PDS showed the highest ovicidal activity among the three types (GSLS, PDS, and PTS) against O. furnacalis eggs at 0 ~ 2-day-old. No-choice and choice antifeeding tests showed the time- and dose-dependent antifeedant activities of GSLS, PDS and PTS against the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis. Moreover, PDS exhibited relative stronger activity against feeding behavior of the 3rd instar larvae than PTS and GSLS. The minor but interesting differences in antifeedant activities among ginsenoside monomers (PPD type ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd; and PPT type ginsenosides Re and Rg1) showed the ginsenoside structures might be associated with the insecticidal activities of ginsenosides. Accordingly, we confirmed the potential of using ginsenosides, especially PDS, as the treatment strategies for controlling O. furnacalis. The potential should be validated in field experiments. Moreover, the uncovering of molecular mechanism in insects in response to different ginsenosides might be helpful for understanding the insecticidal action of GSLS, PDS and PTS against O. furnacalis.
Supporting information
S1 Table. The inhibitory rate of total ginsenosides on hatchability of O. furnacalis eggs at different ages.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211905.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. No-choice antifeedant activity of ginsenosides against the 3rd-instar larvae of O. furnacalis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211905.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Choice antifeedant activity of ginsenosides against 3rd-instar larvae.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211905.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. No-choice antifeedant activity of different ginsenoside monomers against the 3rd-instar larvae of O. furnacalis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211905.s004
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Natural Science Fund Project of Jilin Province Science and Technology Department (20190201263JC) and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303111)
References
- 1. Zhang AH, Tan SQ, Zhao Y, Lei FJ, Zhang LX. Effects of Total Ginsenosides on the Feeding Behavior and Two Enzymes Activities of Mythimna separata (Walker) Larvae. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM. 2015; 2015(10): 451828.
- 2. Zhang A, Liu Z, Lei F, Fu J, Zhang X, Ma W, et al. Antifeedant and oviposition-deterring activity of total ginsenosides against Pieris rapae. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2017; 24(8): 1751–1753. pmid:29551916
- 3. Bak D, Kim HD, Kim YO, Park CG, Han S, Kim J. Neuroprotective effects of 20(S)-protopanaxadiol against glutamate-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in PC12 cells. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2016; 37(2): 378–386. pmid:26709399
- 4. Sang YH, Kim J, Kim E, Su HK, Seo DB, Kim JH, et al. AKT-targeted anti-inflammatory activity of Panax ginseng calyx ethanolic extract. Journal of Ginseng Research. 2017; 42(4): 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2017.1006.1003. pmid:30337810
- 5. Lee IS, Uh IJ, Kim KS, Kim KH, Park J, Kim Y, et al. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Ginsenoside Rg3 via NF-κB Pathway in A549 Cells and Human Asthmatic Lung Tissue. Journal of Immunology Research. 2016; 2016(4): 1–11.
- 6. Yang XD, Yang YY, Ouyang DS, Yang GP. A review of biotransformation and pharmacology of ginsenoside compound K. Fitoterapia. 2015; 100: 208–220. pmid:25449425
- 7. Peng B. Anti-aging effects of Ginsenoside Rg1 and it's mechanisms on brain aging rats induced by D-galactose. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2011; 36(4): 419–422.
- 8. Park EK, Choo MK, Han MJ, Kim DH. Ginsenoside Rh1 possesses antiallergic and anti-inflammatory activities. International Archives of Allergy & Immunology. 2004; 133(2): 113–120.
- 9. Bin LI, Chen D, Wanyi LI, Xiao D. 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol saponins inhibit SKOV3 cell migration. Oncology Letters. 2016; 11(3): 1693–1698. pmid:26998063
- 10. Wanderi C, Kim E, Chang S, Choi C, Choi K. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol Suppresses Viability of Human Glioblastoma Cells via Down-regulation of Cell Adhesion Proteins and Cell-cycle Arrest. Anticancer Research. 2016; 36(3): 925–932. pmid:26976980
- 11. Chen XJ, Zhang XJ, Shui YM, Wan JB, Gao JL. Anticancer Activities of Protopanaxadiol- and Protopanaxatriol-Type Ginsenosides and Their Metabolites. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM. 2016; 4: 1–19.
- 12. Xu FY, Shang WQ, Yu JJ, Sun Q, Li MQ, Sun JS. The antitumor activity study of ginsenosides and metabolites in lung cancer cell. American Journal of Translational Research. 2016; 8(4): 1708. pmid:27186294
- 13. Augustin JM, Kuzina V, Andersen SB, Bak S. Molecular activities, biosynthesis and evolution of triterpenoid saponins. Phytochemistry. 2011; 42(28): 435–457.
- 14. Goławska S, Łukasik I, Goławski A, Kapusta I, Janda B. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) apigenin glycosides and their effect on the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2010; 19(5): 913–919.
- 15. Yu S, Zhou X, Fan L, Xu C, Fei Z, Jing L, et al. Microbial transformation of ginsenoside Rb1, Re and Rg1 and its contribution to the improved anti-inflammatory activity of ginseng. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7(1): 138. pmid:28273939
- 16. Sun J, Hu S, Song X. Adjuvant effects of protopanaxadiol and protopanaxatriol saponins from ginseng roots on the immune responses to ovalbumin in mice. Vaccine. 2007; 25(6): 1114–1120. pmid:17069940
- 17. Liu C, Jin Y, Yu H, Sun C, Gao P, Xiao Y, et al. Biotransformation pathway and kinetics of the hydrolysis of the 3- O—and 20- O -multi-glucosides of PPD-type ginsenosides by ginsenosidase type I. Process Biochemistry. 2014; 49(5): 813–820.
- 18. Wang C, Han HA, Zhang B, Sun S, Xiaoli LI, Hui HE, et al. Chemopreventive Effects of Heat-processed Panax quinquefolius Root on Human Breast Cancer Cells. Anticancer Research. 2008; 28(5A): 2545–2551. pmid:19035277
- 19. Zhang B, Zhou WJ, Gu CJ, Wu K, Yang HL, Mei J, et al. The ginsenoside PPD exerts anti-endometriosis effects by suppressing estrogen receptor-mediated inhibition of endometrial stromal cell autophagy and NK cell cytotoxicity. Cell Death & Disease. 2018; 9(5): 574.
- 20. Oh HA, Kim DE, Choi HJ, Kim NJ, Kim DH. Anti-stress Effects of 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol and 20(S)-Protopanaxatriol in Immobilized Mice. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2015; 38(2): 331–335.
- 21. Yang H, Piao X, Zhang L, Song S, Xu y. Ginsenosides from the stems and leaves of Panax ginseng show antifeedant activity against Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus). Industrial Crops and Products. 2018; 124: 412–417.
- 22. Ai-Hua Z, Shi-Qiang T, Yan Z, Feng-Jie L, Lian-Xue Z. Effects of Total Ginsenosides on the Feeding Behavior and Two Enzymes Activities of Mythimna separata (Walker) Larvae. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014; 10: 451828.
- 23. Tan SQ, Zhang AH, Yong-Hua XU, Zhang LX. Effect of total ginsenoside on content of protein and activity of digestive enzyme of Mythimna separata larvae. Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica. 2013; 38(11): 1692–1696. pmid:24010279
- 24. Wataru K, Takeshi F, Momoko S, Mitsuo M, Yukio I. Physiological adaptation of the Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis to chemical defenses of its host plant, maize. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2010; 56(9): 1349–1355. pmid:20435041
- 25. Guo J, Qi J, He K, Wu J, Bai S, Zhang T, et al. The Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis feeding increases the direct and indirect defense of mid-whorl stage commercial maize in the field. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2018: 1–15. pmid:29754404
- 26. Liu H, Liu Y, Zheng W. The extraction, purification and pharmacological analysis of the total ginsenosides from the stems and leaves. Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology. 2014; 31(5): 4–8. (In Chinese).
- 27. Ling L, Lee SJ, Qiu PY, Wan TI, Sun CK, Han NS. Production of bioactive ginsenoside Rg3(S) and compound K using recombinant Lactococcus lactis. Journal of Ginseng Research. 2017; 42(4): 412–418. pmid:30337801
- 28. Law KM, Kwok HH, Poon PY, Lau CC, Jiang ZH, Tai CS, et al. Ginsenoside compound K induces apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via activation of apoptosis-inducing factor. Chinese Medicine. 2014; 9(1): 11. pmid:24690317
- 29. Murthy HN, Dandin VS, Joseph KS, Park SY, Paek KY. Plant Cell and Organ Culture as an Alternative for the Production of Anticancer Compounds. Anticancer Plants: Natural Products and Biotechnological Implements. 2018; Springer, Singapore: 429–464.