Thermotolerant isolates of Beauveria bassiana as potential control agent of insect pest in subtropical climates

Sumer Alali; Valeria Mereghetti; Franco Faoro; Stefano Bocchi; Fawaz Al Azmeh; Matteo Montagna

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211457

Abstract

The use of Beauveria bassiana in biological control of agricultural pests is mainly hampered by environmental factors, such as elevated temperatures and low humidity. These limitations, further amplified in a global warming scenario, could nullify biological control strategies based on this fungus. The identification of thermotolerant B. bassiana isolates represents a possible strategy to overcome this problem. In this study, in order to maximize the probability in the isolation of thermotolerant B. bassiana, soil samples and infected insects were collected in warm areas of Syria. The obtained fungal isolates were tested for different biological parameters (i.e., growth rate, sporulation and spore germination) at growing temperatures ranging from 20°C to 35°C. Among these isolates (eight from insects and 11 from soil samples), the five with the highest growth rate, spore production and germination at 30°C were tested for their entomopathogenicity through in vivo assays on Ephestia kuehniella larvae. Insect mortality induced by the five isolates ranged from 31% to 100%. Two isolates, one from Phyllognathus excavatus and one from soil, caused 50% of the larval mortality in less than four days, reaching values exceeding 92% in ten days. These two isolates were molecularly identified as B. bassiana sensu stricto by using three markers (i.e., ITS, Bloc and EF1-α). Considering these promising results, further studies are ongoing, testing their efficiency in field conditions as control agents for agricultural insect pests in Mediterranean and Subtropical regions.

Citation: Alali S, Mereghetti V, Faoro F, Bocchi S, Al Azmeh F, Montagna M (2019) Thermotolerant isolates of Beauveria bassiana as potential control agent of insect pest in subtropical climates. PLoS ONE 14(2): e0211457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457

Editor: Yulin Gao, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Plant Protection, CHINA

Received: May 24, 2018; Accepted: January 15, 2019; Published: February 1, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Alali et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The consensus sequences were deposited in ENA archive (accession numbers: LT903665, LT903666, LT903693-LT903696).

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this study.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Global climate change poses new challenges to agricultural production [1], increasing crops’ vulnerability to plant diseases and pests mainly as a consequence of physiological stresses [2], and the expansion of insects and diseases into higher latitudes [3]. The introduction of new pests, aside from endangering food security, requires the adoption of new strategies for their control. This phenomenon particularly affects temperate countries, where the expansion of species range due to climate change has been well documented [4]. In particular, it has been estimated that insects and diseases are expanding towards the poles at 7 km per year [5]. In agriculture, adaptive strategies have already been used to improve the capability of plants to face increasing abiotic stresses and to optimize growth and phenology in relation to new seasonal variations [6–7]. In pest control, the keystone adaptive strategy relies on integrated pest management (IPM), which depends upon different integrated practices starting from an accurate estimation of the pest abundance based on monitoring and working towards the adoption of biological control strategies to reduce of conventional pesticide application [8]. Mycoinsecticides, mainly consisting of the fungal pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokın and Beauveria bassiana Balsam are a fundamental component of these biological control strategies [9,10]. Even though these fungi have already been successfully adopted in large-scale applications (e.g., for the control of the Sahelian grasshopper Oedaleus senegalensis Krauss, 1877 [11] and the Masson’s pine caterpillar Dendrolimus punctatus Walker, 1855 [12]) and their use is increasing yearly (20–44%) in Europe and North America [13], they suffer major limitations. In fact, different abiotic factors, such as UV radiation, low humidity and high temperature, hamper fungal biological activity and, in turn, their effectiveness as biocontrol agents [14–15]. For example, the optimal growth temperature of B. bassiana is between 25°C and 28°C [16], though it has been demonstrated that some isolates are able to grow at a higher temperature (~30°C) with highly reduced activity and may not survive at 34°C [17,18]. To overcome this limitation, a possible strategy has been developed, which relies on genetic improvement of the fungus in terms of its tolerance to oxidative stress was developed [19,20]; however, this approach suffers regulatory and societal limitations related to the use of genetically modified organisms [21]. A possible alternative strategy consists of mass screening of fungal isolates for the target phenotype, a successful strategy in the case of UV tolerance [22].

In this study, in order to overcome temperature limitations in the use of B. bassiana as a biocontrol agent, ad hoc selective scheme (Fig 1) was adopted with the aim of finding out effective thermotolerant B. bassiana isolates, starting with infected insects and soil samples collected in different areas of Syria, subjected to a high environmental temperature.

Download:

Fig 1. Selective process adopted to isolate thermotolerant Beauveria bassiana.

(A) Collection of infected insects and soil samples from hot areas. (B) Isolation and morphological identification of the obtained isolates. (C) Biological traits tested at different temperatures (20°C, 25°C, 30°C and 35°C). (D) Selection of the best isolates in performance and entomopathogenicity evaluation at 30°C. (E) Molecular identification of the most aggressive isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.g001

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The study was carried out on private lands with the permission of the owners; none of the collected species are listed in national or regional law as protected or endangered.

Fungal isolates

Fungi were isolated from insect specimens showing superficial hyphal growth and from soil samples, both collected directly from fields in different hot Syria regions (S1 Table; Fig 2). Isolation from soil samples (five replicates each) was performed by the insect trap method [23], modified by using 4-5^th instar larvae of Ephestia kuehniella (obtained from insectary at the Biological Control Studies and Research Centre, Damascus University-Faculty of Agriculture). E. kuehniella larvae were observed every week up to three weeks and those with evident fungal growth were selected. Infected insects (i.e., insect collected from the field and E. kuehniella larvae experimentally infected), were surface sterilized and incubated in a moist chamber up to the appearance of an actively growing mycelium [24]. This mycelium was transferred to SDYA [25]. After two weeks, fungal isolates were subcultured using a selective medium (40 g glucose, 10 g proteose peptone, 15 g agar, 0.01 g crystal violet, 0.25 g cyclohexamide, 0.5 g chloramphenicol, 1L distilled water) [26]. Isolates were subcultured several times to ensure purity and monosporic cultures from all isolates were obtained, then morphologically identified as B. bassiana s.l. by a microscope Olympus BX51 (Olympus, Japan) at 400x magnifications and the morphological key [27]. The selected isolates are stored in the microorganisms repository of the Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano—Italy.

Download:

Fig 2. Geographical location of the area where the samples were collected.

The inset shows the sampling sites distribution within the Syrian borders, the origin of the sample (soil or infected insects) and the code of the isolates. Maps were plotted by using the function map in the R package “maps” [28].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.g002

Spores preparation for further assays

The obtained isolates were cultured on SDYA medium plates at 24±1°C for 14 days. Fresh conidia were harvested from the plates by adding 10 ml of 0.05% Tween 80, and then transferred to a sterile plastic tube (50 ml), vortexed for 3 min and filtered through one layer of sterilized filter paper (Watmann n. 01). Conidial concentration was calculated by using a hemocytometer and adjusted to 10⁶ spores × ml^-1 by dilution to be used in the following assay [29].

Biological traits of Beauveria bassiana isolates

Biological traits of isolates, growth rate, sporulation and spores’ germination were estimated on SDYA medium plates at four different constant temperatures: 20±0.1°C, 25±0.1°C, 30±0.1°C and 35±0.1°C. The growth rate and spore production were estimated according to the method described by Mustafa and Kaur [30]. Five replicates of each isolate were prepared. The growth rate of the colony was obtained measuring its diameter after 14 days. At the same time, five pieces of the grown mycelium (1 cm²) were randomly taken from the colony; samples were placed in 5 ml of 0.05% Tween 80 solution and vortexed. Spore yield was determined using a haemocytometer.

Spore’s germination was determined by the agar slide technique [30]. Media coated slides were inoculated with 100 μl of spores’ suspension (10⁶ spores × ml^-1) from each isolate. The inoculated slides (5 for each isolate) were placed in Petri dishes and incubated at the selected temperatures (i.e., 20±0.1°C, 25±0.1°C, 30±0.1°C and 35±0.1°C). Slides were observed by a light microscope (400×) after 24 hours. A conidium was considered germinated when a distinct germ tube of length twice its diameter was observed. In order to obtain reliable estimates of germination percentage [31], 300 conidia were scored for each replicate. Isolates with the best performance at high temperature were selected to perform the entomopathogenicity assays.

Fungal growth rate (mm/day), conidial production (conidia/ml) and spore germination ratio (number of germinated spores/300 spores), expressed as percentage, were analysed as completely randomized design using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey test for post-Hoc analysis by using (SPSS.18). In addition, the percentage of the difference in performance due to the increase of temperature from 25°C to 30°C were calculated for each biological trait [32], and its correlation with the hot season’s average temperature of the sites of sampling [33], were tested by Pearson coefficient by using (SPSS.18).

Evaluation of entomopathogenicity

The evaluation of isolates entomopathogenicity was tested in laboratory on E. kuehniella 3^rd instar larvae after surface sterilization as in Goettel and Inglis [15]. For each isolate, five concentrations of conidia were tested (from 1×10^{2 to} 1×10⁶, spores/ml). Larvae were dipped singly into the suspension at the tested concentration for 1s, and then moved to a sterile filter paper to dry. Three replicates of each isolate for the tested concentration were incubated in a humid chamber at 30±1°C; each replicate consists of ten treated larvae. The control was prepared by dipping larvae into 0.05% Tween 80 solution. Every two days, over a period of ten, larvae were observed in order to record the mortality and the symptoms used to estimate the Fungal Development Index (FDI [34]) (S2 Table). In addition, the corrected mortality [35], LC₅₀ and LT₅₀ were calculated by using Probit analysis in SPSS 18.

As it is well known that B. bassiana entomopathogenicity is correlated with the production of an array of cuticle-degrading extracellular enzymes, chitinase plate assays were performed [30]. The enzymatic activity index was calculated using the formula of St. Leger et al [36].

Molecular characterization

In order to confirm the previous morphological identification, isolates with the highest entomopathogenic activity at high temperature were molecularly characterized. DNA was extracted from mycelium grown in SDY broth [37]. DNA was extracted from 200 μg of dried mycelium using the CTAB method described by Möller [38] with the modifications of Safavi [39]. Three nuclear markers were used to perform the molecular characterization of the selected isolates according to previous studies [40,41]. The selected markers were: i) the internal transcriber spacers I, II and the ribosomal 5.8S rRNA (here after ITS); ii) the B locus intergenic region (Bloc), and iii) the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1-α). The used primers and PCR amplification conditions are reported in S3 Table.

Successful amplifications were determined by gel electrophoresis and PCR products were bidirectionally sequenced by ABI technology (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The obtained electropherograms were manually edited and assembled into a consensus sequence using Geneious Pro 5.3 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand); the consensus sequences were deposited in ENA archive (accession numbers: LT903665, LT903666, LT903693-LT903696). Sequences were identified by using BlastN [42]. In order to perform the phylogenetic analyses of the selected isolated of B. bassiana, orthologous sequences of the selected markers were collected from GenBank (S4 Table). Orthologous sequences of Beauveria sp. and Beauveria brongniartii were included in the dataset as outgroups (S4 Table). The obtained dataset, one for each locus, were aligned using MAFFT [43], with G-INS-i as the search strategy [44]. The nucleotide substitution models were estimated for the three data sets using jModelTest 2 [45] and selected according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The analyses selected the GTR [46] with proportion of invariable sites (I) as the best model for the EF1-α dataset; the HKY [47] with I and site-heterogeneity in evolutionary rates (Γ-distribution parameter) as the best for Bloc and ITS dataset. Phylogenetic inference was performed, using both Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference approaches, on single-marker and on the dataset obtained after their concatenation. Maximum likelihood analyses were performed using PhyML version 3.0 [48] with the best of NNI and SPR as tree searching operation and node support estimated using 100 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian analyses were performed using MrBayes 3.2 [49] in two independent runs, with one cold and five heated Markov chains (λ = 0.1) each, for 2 × 10⁶ generations, that were sampled every 100 generations. The convergence of each run was visually inspected using TRACER [50] and an appropriate number of trees discarded as burn-in.

Results

Identification of fungal isolates

A total of 19 isolates were morphologically identified as B. bassiana. Isolates were retrieved from both insects (eight isolates) and soil samples (11 isolates) (S1 Table; Fig 3a). The insect hosts were adults of Phyllognathus excavates (Fig 3b), Capnodis spp., Cerambyx dux and Eurygaster integriceps, and the larvae of B. mori (Fig 3c) and Paropta paradoxa (Fig 3d).

Download:

Fig 3. The collected insects infested by Beauveria bassiana, with the degrees of FDI on Ephestia kuehienella larvae.

(a) infected larva of Ephestia kuehniella in soil trap method; (b) Phyllognathus excavatus adult (♀) infected with Beauveria bassiana; (c) Bombyx mori larva infected with B. bassiana; (d) Paropta paradoxa larva infected with B. bassiana; (e) Germination of B. bassiana spores; (f) Healthy larvae of E. kuehienella (3^rd instar); (g) larva of E. kuehienella with milanic spots (FDI = 0.5); (h) dead larva of E. kuehienella covered with mycelium growth (FDI = 2); (i) larva of E. kuehienella covered with B. bassiana growth in full sporulation (FDI = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.g003

Biological traits of Beauveria bassiana isolates

Isolates were significantly different in their responses to temperature in terms of biological traits. In general, all isolates showed their highest biological performances at 25°C. Isolates obtained from areas with lower temperatures were superior in growth rate (e.g., bbca5 with 2.24±0.12 mm × day^-1), whilst those collected from the hottest areas had the lowest values (e.g., isolate bbbm12 with 1.71±0.08 mm×day^-1) (S5 Table). At 25°C, the highest spore germination was recorded for bbL4 (3.46±0.05 spores × ml^-1), whilst the lowest value was recorded for isolate bbSw23 (1.19±0.03 spores × ml^-1); spore germination ≥ 96% occurred for all isolates except bbDR1 (92.7±0.24%) (S5 Table; Fig 3e).

With a growth temperature of 30°C, isolates obtained from samples collected in the hottest areas showed the highest values of measured biological traits (i.e., growth rate, spore production and spore germination). However, at this temperature the obtained values were lower than those achieved at 25°C. For all the tested traits, five out of the 19 isolates were superior (S5 Table), since they suffered a limited decrease in performance due to the increase of temperature from 25°C to 30°C (S6 Table). In addition, significant negative correlations were found between the reduction of tested biological parameters (growth at 25°C and 30°C, see Material and methods) and the average temperature of the hot season at the isolates’ collecting sites (Pearson coefficient (r) = -0.56, -0.45 and -0.54 for growth rate, spore production and spore germination reduction (%), respectively; P-value < 0.001) (S6 Table). At a growth temperature of 20°C, all the biological trait values were reduced in respect of those obtained at 25°C and 30°C (S5 Table), whilst no growth was recorded at 35°C. At this extreme temperature, only 2% of the isolates were able to germinate, but the germination tube soon aborted.

In view of the above results, isolates bbph2, bbph13, bbL4, bbbm14 and bbpp1 were selected for the bioassays for their pathogenicity on larvae of E. kuehniella.

Entomopathogenic activity assessment.

The pathogenicity of the five selected B. bassiana isolates (i.e., bbpp1, bbph2, bbL4, bbph13 and bbbm14; S5 Table) was evaluated on the insect model E. kuehniella at 30°C. At a spores’ concentration of 10² and 10³, no mortality was recorded after ten days for all the selected isolates (Fig 3f). The FDI was 0 in the case of the first spore concentration, but when 10³ spores were inoculated, small melanic spots appeared on some larvae (0.5 ≥ FDI > 0; Table 1; Fig 3g). At a spore concentration of 10⁴, the mortality arose up to 26% in the case of the bioassays with bbL4 and bbph2 isolates; however, no mortality was recorded with bbph13 and bbbm14 isolates. The increased mortality was accompanied by a significant difference in FDI values between the isolates; the highest values were recorded for bbL4 and bbph2 (FDI_bbL4 = 0.9, FDI_bbph2 = 0.83), indicating the presence of large melanic spots on most of the larvae (Fig 3g). At a spore concentration of 10⁵, the mortality reached 100% in the case of isolate bbph2, followed by isolate bbL4 (93%). The two isolates bbpp1 and bbbm14 caused mortality lower than 50% of the E. kuehniella larvae. At the highest tested spore concentration (i.e., 10⁶), isolates bbph13, bbph2 and bbL4 caused a larvae mortality of 100% vs. less than 70% in the case of bbpp1 and bbbm14, with an FDI of 1.57 and of 1.53, respectively (Fig 3h and 3i).

Download:

Table 1. Mortality of the larvae and fungal development index at the 10^th day of treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.t001

Estimation of the LC₅₀ showed that isolates bbph2 and bbL4 had the lowest values, with 1.65×10⁴ spores/ml and 2.01×10⁴ spores/ml, respectively (Table 2, S1 and S2 Figs). For these two isolates, the LT₅₀ values, at a spore concentration of 10⁵, were estimated to be 3.85 and 3.66 days, indicating their higher level of aggressiveness (Table 2).

Download:

Table 2. Aggressivity assessment of selected isolates of Beauveria bassiana.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.t002

All five selected isolates showed chitinase activity. However, a difference between the isolates was recorded. Isolates bbph2 and bbL4, with a 1.35 and 1.31 chitinase activity index, showed the highest values (Table 2).

Molecular characterization

In order to perform the molecular characterization of bbph2 and bbL4 isolates (with the highest biological characterization scores and the highest virulence), three nuclear markers were amplified through PCRs. All three markers (i.e., ITS, Bloc and EF1-α) led to positive amplifications and sequencing for both isolates. The obtained consensus sequences were subjected to BLAST analyses: ITS and Bloc sequences (~550 bp and ~1440 bp, respectively) of both isolates possessed 100% of sequence identity with the orthologous sequences of B. bassiana (ITS: isolate ArgB10, accession number KT378227; strain MTCC_6286, accession number JQ266208; Bloc: strain RCEF5438, accession number JQ867110; strain ARSEF 1040, accession number HQ880689). Instead, EF1-α amplicons (~950 bp) possessed 99% of identity with B. bassiana isolate KVL 03_90 and strain ARSEF 1554 (accession numbers EF193191 and AY883693, respectively).

Phylogenetic reconstructions, with both maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference approaches, were performed for each single-gene dataset as well as for the dataset obtained concatenating the three gene sequence alignments (Fig 4; S3, S4 and S5 Figs). All the obtained topologies are in agreement and confirm, with a high node support (Bayesian posterior probability = 1 and bootstrap = 100), the phylogenetic position of bbph2 and bbL4 isolates in the B. bassiana clade (Fig 4). In details, bbL4 isolates resulted sister of B. bassiana ARSEF 1811 [41], isolated from the weevil Sitona discoideus, collected in Morocco. Isolate bbph2 clustered within a clade composed of B. bassiana ARSEF 344 and ARSEF 3097, respectively, isolated from the leaf beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata and from the weevil Anthonomus grandis, collected in the USA [41].

Download:

Fig 4. Bayesian consensus tree inferred on ITS, Bloc and EF1-α gene sequences.

Support values expressed as Bayesian posterior probability are reported above the nodes, while below each nodes the approximate likelihood ratio test (as obtained in the Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic inference analysis performed on the same dataset) are recorded. Outgroups: Beauveria sp. and Beauveria brongniartii. The scale bar at the bottom indicates the distance expressed in substitutions per site. Isolates obtained in this study are surrounded by black lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.g004

Discussion

In this study, all B. bassiana isolates germinated and grew at 20°C, 25°C and 30°C, but not at 35°C, as expected. Five B. bassiana isolates, namely bbpp1, bbph2, bbL4, bbph13 and bbbm14, performed well in the tested biological traits, also growing at 30°C (S5 Table). It is worth noting that four out of the five isolates were collected in the hottest areas. The only exception is represented by isolate bbL4, obtained from a site with a lower temperature (27°C). The results of this study support the existence of a relationship between the termotholerance ability of the isolates and their geographical origin, even if this is still under debate [32,51]. In terms of pathogenicity, the five selected isolates induced a differential mortality on the model insect (i.e., E. kuehniella), with values ranging from 31% to 100% (Table 1). Isolates bbph2, bbL4 and bbph13 achieved more than 75% mortality, whereas isolates bbph2 and bbL4 showed the highest values of FDI within the same time period (2.73±0.27, 2.87±0.03, respectively), which highlights the difference in pathogenicity levels between the isolates [52]. The achieved values of pathogenicity further support adaptation of the isolates to growth at a relatively high temperature. In addition, the isolates bbph2 and bbL4 possessed a low value of LC₅₀ (1.65 × 10⁴ and 2.01 × 10⁴, respectively), which are in a range of values considered effective on lepidopteran larvae as E. kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella [53,54]. The values of LT₅₀ obtained for these two isolates (less than four days) confirm their aggressivity, according with the findings of Sosa-Gomez [55]. In addition, the two isolates possessed significantly higher values of chitinase activity among those tested (Table 2), a feature correlated with their entomopathogenicity [30]. Multilocus-based molecular identification of isolates bbph2 and bbL4 confirmed the morphology-based identification as B. bassiana s.s. Phylogenetic analyses, performed on each single marker and on the concatenated dataset, attributed the bbph2 (isolated from the beetle P. excavatus) and bbL4 (isolated from a soil sample) isolates to two separate B. bassiana clades: the first, with B. bassiana isolated from beetles collected in the USA (L. decemlineata and A. grandis); the second, sister of B. bassiana isolated from a weevil collected in Morocco. Even considering the limited sample size, the achieved results apparently indicate the absence of a correlation in terms of geographical origin of the isolates and host taxonomy. For example, isolates obtained from the same geographical area (Morocco) and from the same host (Sitona discoideus) were grouped into two separate and well-supported clades (Fig 4, S4 Table).

On the basis of the achieved results, the isolates of B. bassiana, obtained from a soil sample collected in Lattakia and from the insect P. excavatus collected in Damascus, could be considered as promising thermotolerant isolates to be used as biocontrol agents, especially against pests inhabiting Mediterranean and Subtropical areas, such as R. ferrugineus and Tuta absoluta. However, further studies are required to evaluate the efficiency of mass production of those isolates and their effect on non-target organisms.

In accordance with the idea that isolates’ capability to survive and grow at high temperatures is related to the specific growth habitat on regional or micro scales [17,32], the strategy adopted in this study could be considered a useful protocol for selecting thermotolerant B. bassiana isolates from high-temperature natural or semi-natural areas.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Probit analysis for calculating the lethal concentration of B. bassiana isolates (LC₅₀).

Corrected mortality percentage of 3^rd instar larvae of E. kuehinella treated with different concentrations (log₁₀) of B. bassiana isolates at the 10th day of observation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Probit analysis for calculating the lethal time of B. bassiana isolates (LT₅₀).

Corrected mortality percentage of 3^rd instar larvae of E. kuehinella at different observation days (log₁₀), after treatment with B. bassiana isolates (10^{^5} spores/ml).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from an allignment of the ITS sequences.

Branch ends with the accession number of the sequences. The scale bar at the bottom indicates the distance expressed in substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from an allignment of the Bloc sequences.

Branch ends with the accession number of the sequences. The scale bar at the bottom indicates the distance expressed in substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from an allignment of the EF1-α sequences.

Branch ends with the accession number of the sequences. The scale bar at the bottom indicates the distance expressed in substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s005

(TIF)

S1 Table. Isolates and sampling sites characteristics.

Beauveria bassiana isolates and their sites of collection and source (insect host or soil sample).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s006

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Isolates agressivity evaluation using the Fungal Development Index (FDI).

A scale based on the observed symptoms of Beauveria bassiana spores infection and development on the surface of Ephestia kuehienella larvae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s007

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Molecular markers used for B. bassiana characterization.

The primers, PCR amplification conditions and the references.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s008

(DOCX)

S4 Table. A list of characterized Beauveria isolates with their host and origin.

Beauveria isolates used in this study as comparatives and ITS, Bloc and EFα-1 GenBank accession numbers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s009

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Biological characteristics of the obtained Beauveria bassiana isolates.

The measured biological parameters of the obtained B. bassiana isolates at different tested temperatures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s010

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Changes in the biological parameters of the obtained Beauveria bassiana isolates.

Reduction percentages in the biological parameters due to the increase of tested temperatures (25°C to 30°C), and their correlation with the average temperature of the collection area.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211457.s011

(DOCX)

References

1. Enete AA, Amusa TA. Challenges of agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nigeria: a synthesis from the literature. Field Actions Sci Rep. [Online] 2010;4. URL: http://factsreports.revues.org/678.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Biber-Freudenberger L, Ziemacki J, Tonnang HEZ, Borgemeister C. Future risks of pest species under changing climatic conditions. PloS ONE. 2016;11:e0153237. pmid:27054718
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Sutherst RW. Impact of climate change on pests and diseases in Australasia. Search. 1990;21:230–232.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Cilas C, Goebel FR, Babin R, Avelino J. Tropical crop pests and diseases in a climate change setting—A few examples. 2016. In: Climate change and agriculture worldwide. Torquebiau Emmanuel (ed.), Manley David (trad.), Cowan Paul (trad.). Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 73–82. ISBN 978-94-017-7460-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_6
5. Barford E. Crop pests advancing with global warming. Nature. 2013.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Ergon Å, Seddaiu G, Korhonen P, Virkajärvi P, Bellocchi G, Jørgensen M, et al. How can forage production in Nordic and Mediterranean Europe adapt to the challenges and opportunities arising from climate change? Eur J Agron. 2018;92:97–106.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Iglesias A, Garrote L. Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe. Agric Water Manag. 2015;155:113–124,
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Abrol DP, Shankar U. Integrated pest management, in breeding oilseed crops for sustainable production, edited by gupta surinder kumar, Academic Press, San Diego. 2016; 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801309-0.00020-3
9. Kumar S, Kaur J. Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis as ecosafe alternatives to chemical insecticides against sunflower capitulum borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5:185–188.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Faria MR, Wraight SP. Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol Control. 2007;43:237–256.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Kooyman C, Bateman RP, Langewald J, Lomer CJ, Ouambama Z, Thomas MB. Operational-scale application of entomopathogenic fungi for control of Sahelian grasshoppers. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 1997;264:541–546.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Huang B, Li CR, Li ZZ, Fan MZ, Li ZZ. Molecular identification of the teleomorph of Beauveria bassiana. Mycotaxon. 2002;81:229–236.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Quiroz RD, Roussos S, Hernández D, Rodríguez R, Castillo F, Aguilar CN. Challenges and opportunities of the bio-pesticides production by solid-state fermentation: filamentous fungi as a model, Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;35:326–333. pmid:24494699
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Vidal C, Fargues J. Climatic constraints for fungal biopesticides, in use of entomopathogenic fungi in biological pest management, Ekesi S. and Maniana N.K., Eds., Kerala: Res. Signpost. 2007;39–55.
15. Goettel MS, Inglis GD, Wraight SP, Fungi: in field manual of techniques in invertebrate pathology. Lacey L. A. and Kaya H. K., Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. 2000;255–282.
16. Parker BL, Skinner ML, Costa SD, Gouli S, Reid W, El Bouhssini M. Entomopathogenic fungi of Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae): collection and characterization for development. Biol Control. 2003;27:260–272.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Abdulhai M, El-Bouhssini M, Jamal M, Tnssi AN, Sayyadi Z, Skinner M, Parker BL. Beauveria bassiana characterization and efficacy vs. Sunn Pest, Eurygaster integriceps puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). Pak J Biological Sci. 2010;13:1052–1056.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Hiromori H, Yaginuma D, Kajino K, Hatsukade M. The effects of temperature on the insecticidal activity of Beauveria amorpha to Heptophylla picea. Appl Entomol Zool. 2004;39:389–392.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Ortiz-Urquiza A, Luo Z, Keyhani N. Improving mycoinsecticides for insect biological control. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:1057–1068. pmid:25503318
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Xie XQ, Wang J, Huang BF, Ying SH, Feng MG. A new manganese superoxide dismutase identified from Beauveria bassiana enhances virulence and stress tolerance when overexpressed in the fungal pathogen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(5):1543–1553. pmid:20094711
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Koenraadt CJM, Takken W. Viability of GM fungi crucial to malaria control. Science. 2011;332:175. pmid:21474739
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Fernandes ÉKK, Rangel DEN, Braga GUL, Roberts DW. Tolerance of entomopathogenic fungi to ultraviolet radiation: a review on screening of strains and their formulation. Curr Genet. 2015;61:427–440. pmid:25986971
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Meyling NV. Methods for isolation of entomopathogenic fungi from the soil environment. Man Isol Soil borne Entomopathog Fungi. 2007;1–18.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Lacey LA, Brooks WM. Initial handling and diagnosis of diseased insects. In: manual of techniques in insect pathology. Lacey La (Ed.). Academic press, New York. 1979:1–15.
25. Odds FC. Sabouraud ('s) agar. J. Med Vet Mycol. 1992;29:355–359.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Doberski JW, Tribe HT. Isolation of entomogenous fungi from elm bark and soil with reference to ecology of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Trans. Br Mycol Soc. 1980;74:95–100.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Humber RA. Entomopathogenic Fungal Identification USDA-ARS Plant Protection Research Unit 32. 2005. Originally prepared for a workshop jointly sponsored by the American phytopathological society and entomological society of America, Las Vegas, Nevada. November 1998.
28. Becker AB, Wilks AR. Maps in S code. 1993; R version by Ray Brownrigg. Enhancements by Thomas P Minka and Alex Deckmyn.
29. Ferron P. Biological control of insect pests by entomogenous fungi. Ann Rev Entomol. 1978;23:409–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Mustafa U, Kaur G. Studies on extracellular enzyme production in Beauveria bassiana isolates. Int J Biotechnology. 2010;6:701–713.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Milner RJ, Huppatz RJ, Swaris SC. A new method for assessment of germination of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia, J Invertbr Pathol. 1991;121–123.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Kryukov VY, Yaroslavtseva ON, Elisaphenko EA, Mitkovets PV, Lednev GR, uisembekov BA, et al. Change in the temperature preferences of Beauveria bassiana sensu lato isolates in the latitude gradient of Siberia and Kazakhstan. Microbiology. 2012;81:453–459.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Diebel J, Norda J. Weatherspark, Cedar lake ventures Inc. 2013.
34. Horňák p. Monitoring přirozeného výskytu entomopatogenních hub v půdních ekosystémech. Disertační práce, jihočeská univerzita v českých budějovicích, zemědělská fakulta. 2004; In Šimková J. Influence of different storage conditions on vitality and virulence of Beauveria bassiana spores. J Agrobiol. 2009;26:75–81.
35. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–267.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. St. Leger RJ, Joshi L, Roberts DW. Adaptation of proteases and carbohydrases of saprophytic, phytopathogenic and entomopathogenic fungi to the requirements of their ecological niches. Microbiology. 1997;143:1983–1992. pmid:9202474
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Goettel MS, Inglis GD. Fungi: hyphomycetes. In manual of techniques in insect pathology. Lacey L.A. (Ed.). San Diego, academic press. 1997;211–249.
38. Möller EM, Bahnweg G, Sandermann H, Geiger HH. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:6115–6116. pmid:1461751
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Safavi S. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity assessment of a new isolate of entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana in Iran J Plant Prot Res. 2010;50:158–163.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M., Gelfand D., Shinsky J., White T. (Eds.), PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego. 1990;315–322.
41. Rehner SA, Buckley EP. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97:84–98. pmid:16389960
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. pmid:9254694
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Katoh K, Kuma KI, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:511–518, pmid:15661851
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Katoh K, Toh H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform. 2008;94:286–298, pmid:18372315
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772–772.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol. 1984;20:86–93. pmid:6429346
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22:160–174. pmid:3934395
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Gouy M, Guindon GM, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:221–224. pmid:19854763
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–542. pmid:22357727
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969–1973. pmid:22367748
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Yeo H, Pell JK, Alderson PJ, Clark SJ, Pye BJ. Laboratory evaluation of temperature effects on the germination and growth of entomopathogenic fungi and on their pathogenicity to two aphid species. Pest Manag Sci. 2003;59:156–165. pmid:12587869
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Castellanos-Moguel J, Mier T, Reyes-Montes MdR, Navarro Barranco H, Zepeda Rodríguez A, Pérez-Torres A, et al. Fungal growth development index and ultrastructural study of whiteflies infected by three Isaria fumosorosea isolates of different pathogenicity. Rev Mex Micol. 2013;38:23–33.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Faraji S, Mehrvar A, Shadmehri AD. Studies on the virulence of different isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metcsn.) Sorokin against Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Afr J Agric Res. 2013;8:4157–4161.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Arooni-Hesari M, Talaei-Hassanloui R, Sabahi Q. Simultaneous use of entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and diatomaceous earth against the larvae of Indian Meal Moth, Plodia interpunctella. Adv Biosci Biotechnol. 2015;6:501–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.68052.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Sosa-Gomez DR, Alves SB, Milani MT. Characterization and phenetic analysis of geographical isolates of Beauveria spp. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 1994;29: 401–409.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Enete AA, Amusa TA. Challenges of agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nigeria: a synthesis from the literature. Field Actions Sci Rep. [Online] 2010;4. URL: http://factsreports.revues.org/678.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Biber-Freudenberger L, Ziemacki J, Tonnang HEZ, Borgemeister C. Future risks of pest species under changing climatic conditions. PloS ONE. 2016;11:e0153237. pmid:27054718
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Sutherst RW. Impact of climate change on pests and diseases in Australasia. Search. 1990;21:230–232.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Cilas C, Goebel FR, Babin R, Avelino J. Tropical crop pests and diseases in a climate change setting—A few examples. 2016. In: Climate change and agriculture worldwide. Torquebiau Emmanuel (ed.), Manley David (trad.), Cowan Paul (trad.). Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 73–82. ISBN 978-94-017-7460-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7462-8_6

[ref5] 5. Barford E. Crop pests advancing with global warming. Nature. 2013.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Ergon Å, Seddaiu G, Korhonen P, Virkajärvi P, Bellocchi G, Jørgensen M, et al. How can forage production in Nordic and Mediterranean Europe adapt to the challenges and opportunities arising from climate change? Eur J Agron. 2018;92:97–106.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Iglesias A, Garrote L. Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe. Agric Water Manag. 2015;155:113–124,
View Article
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Abrol DP, Shankar U. Integrated pest management, in breeding oilseed crops for sustainable production, edited by gupta surinder kumar, Academic Press, San Diego. 2016; 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801309-0.00020-3

[ref9] 9. Kumar S, Kaur J. Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis as ecosafe alternatives to chemical insecticides against sunflower capitulum borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5:185–188.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Faria MR, Wraight SP. Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol Control. 2007;43:237–256.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Kooyman C, Bateman RP, Langewald J, Lomer CJ, Ouambama Z, Thomas MB. Operational-scale application of entomopathogenic fungi for control of Sahelian grasshoppers. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci. 1997;264:541–546.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Huang B, Li CR, Li ZZ, Fan MZ, Li ZZ. Molecular identification of the teleomorph of Beauveria bassiana. Mycotaxon. 2002;81:229–236.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Quiroz RD, Roussos S, Hernández D, Rodríguez R, Castillo F, Aguilar CN. Challenges and opportunities of the bio-pesticides production by solid-state fermentation: filamentous fungi as a model, Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;35:326–333. pmid:24494699
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Vidal C, Fargues J. Climatic constraints for fungal biopesticides, in use of entomopathogenic fungi in biological pest management, Ekesi S. and Maniana N.K., Eds., Kerala: Res. Signpost. 2007;39–55.

[ref15] 15. Goettel MS, Inglis GD, Wraight SP, Fungi: in field manual of techniques in invertebrate pathology. Lacey L. A. and Kaya H. K., Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. 2000;255–282.

[ref16] 16. Parker BL, Skinner ML, Costa SD, Gouli S, Reid W, El Bouhssini M. Entomopathogenic fungi of Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae): collection and characterization for development. Biol Control. 2003;27:260–272.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Abdulhai M, El-Bouhssini M, Jamal M, Tnssi AN, Sayyadi Z, Skinner M, Parker BL. Beauveria bassiana characterization and efficacy vs. Sunn Pest, Eurygaster integriceps puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). Pak J Biological Sci. 2010;13:1052–1056.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Hiromori H, Yaginuma D, Kajino K, Hatsukade M. The effects of temperature on the insecticidal activity of Beauveria amorpha to Heptophylla picea. Appl Entomol Zool. 2004;39:389–392.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Ortiz-Urquiza A, Luo Z, Keyhani N. Improving mycoinsecticides for insect biological control. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:1057–1068. pmid:25503318
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Xie XQ, Wang J, Huang BF, Ying SH, Feng MG. A new manganese superoxide dismutase identified from Beauveria bassiana enhances virulence and stress tolerance when overexpressed in the fungal pathogen. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(5):1543–1553. pmid:20094711
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Koenraadt CJM, Takken W. Viability of GM fungi crucial to malaria control. Science. 2011;332:175. pmid:21474739
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Fernandes ÉKK, Rangel DEN, Braga GUL, Roberts DW. Tolerance of entomopathogenic fungi to ultraviolet radiation: a review on screening of strains and their formulation. Curr Genet. 2015;61:427–440. pmid:25986971
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Meyling NV. Methods for isolation of entomopathogenic fungi from the soil environment. Man Isol Soil borne Entomopathog Fungi. 2007;1–18.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lacey LA, Brooks WM. Initial handling and diagnosis of diseased insects. In: manual of techniques in insect pathology. Lacey La (Ed.). Academic press, New York. 1979:1–15.

[ref25] 25. Odds FC. Sabouraud ('s) agar. J. Med Vet Mycol. 1992;29:355–359.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Doberski JW, Tribe HT. Isolation of entomogenous fungi from elm bark and soil with reference to ecology of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Trans. Br Mycol Soc. 1980;74:95–100.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Humber RA. Entomopathogenic Fungal Identification USDA-ARS Plant Protection Research Unit 32. 2005. Originally prepared for a workshop jointly sponsored by the American phytopathological society and entomological society of America, Las Vegas, Nevada. November 1998.

[ref28] 28. Becker AB, Wilks AR. Maps in S code. 1993; R version by Ray Brownrigg. Enhancements by Thomas P Minka and Alex Deckmyn.

[ref29] 29. Ferron P. Biological control of insect pests by entomogenous fungi. Ann Rev Entomol. 1978;23:409–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Mustafa U, Kaur G. Studies on extracellular enzyme production in Beauveria bassiana isolates. Int J Biotechnology. 2010;6:701–713.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Milner RJ, Huppatz RJ, Swaris SC. A new method for assessment of germination of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia, J Invertbr Pathol. 1991;121–123.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Kryukov VY, Yaroslavtseva ON, Elisaphenko EA, Mitkovets PV, Lednev GR, uisembekov BA, et al. Change in the temperature preferences of Beauveria bassiana sensu lato isolates in the latitude gradient of Siberia and Kazakhstan. Microbiology. 2012;81:453–459.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Diebel J, Norda J. Weatherspark, Cedar lake ventures Inc. 2013.

[ref34] 34. Horňák p. Monitoring přirozeného výskytu entomopatogenních hub v půdních ekosystémech. Disertační práce, jihočeská univerzita v českých budějovicích, zemědělská fakulta. 2004; In Šimková J. Influence of different storage conditions on vitality and virulence of Beauveria bassiana spores. J Agrobiol. 2009;26:75–81.

[ref35] 35. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–267.
View Article
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. St. Leger RJ, Joshi L, Roberts DW. Adaptation of proteases and carbohydrases of saprophytic, phytopathogenic and entomopathogenic fungi to the requirements of their ecological niches. Microbiology. 1997;143:1983–1992. pmid:9202474
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Goettel MS, Inglis GD. Fungi: hyphomycetes. In manual of techniques in insect pathology. Lacey L.A. (Ed.). San Diego, academic press. 1997;211–249.

[ref38] 38. Möller EM, Bahnweg G, Sandermann H, Geiger HH. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:6115–6116. pmid:1461751
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Safavi S. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity assessment of a new isolate of entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana in Iran J Plant Prot Res. 2010;50:158–163.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M., Gelfand D., Shinsky J., White T. (Eds.), PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego. 1990;315–322.

[ref41] 41. Rehner SA, Buckley EP. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97:84–98. pmid:16389960
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. pmid:9254694
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Katoh K, Kuma KI, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:511–518, pmid:15661851
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Katoh K, Toh H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform. 2008;94:286–298, pmid:18372315
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772–772.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol. 1984;20:86–93. pmid:6429346
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22:160–174. pmid:3934395
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Gouy M, Guindon GM, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:221–224. pmid:19854763
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–542. pmid:22357727
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969–1973. pmid:22367748
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Yeo H, Pell JK, Alderson PJ, Clark SJ, Pye BJ. Laboratory evaluation of temperature effects on the germination and growth of entomopathogenic fungi and on their pathogenicity to two aphid species. Pest Manag Sci. 2003;59:156–165. pmid:12587869
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Castellanos-Moguel J, Mier T, Reyes-Montes MdR, Navarro Barranco H, Zepeda Rodríguez A, Pérez-Torres A, et al. Fungal growth development index and ultrastructural study of whiteflies infected by three Isaria fumosorosea isolates of different pathogenicity. Rev Mex Micol. 2013;38:23–33.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Faraji S, Mehrvar A, Shadmehri AD. Studies on the virulence of different isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metcsn.) Sorokin against Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Afr J Agric Res. 2013;8:4157–4161.
View Article
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Arooni-Hesari M, Talaei-Hassanloui R, Sabahi Q. Simultaneous use of entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and diatomaceous earth against the larvae of Indian Meal Moth, Plodia interpunctella. Adv Biosci Biotechnol. 2015;6:501–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.68052.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Sosa-Gomez DR, Alves SB, Milani MT. Characterization and phenetic analysis of geographical isolates of Beauveria spp. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 1994;29: 401–409.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Fungal isolates

Spores preparation for further assays

Biological traits of Beauveria bassiana isolates

Evaluation of entomopathogenicity

Molecular characterization

Results

Identification of fungal isolates

Biological traits of Beauveria bassiana isolates

Entomopathogenic activity assessment.

Molecular characterization

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Probit analysis for calculating the lethal concentration of B. bassiana isolates (LC50).

S2 Fig. Probit analysis for calculating the lethal time of B. bassiana isolates (LT50).

S3 Fig. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from an allignment of the ITS sequences.

S4 Fig. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from an allignment of the Bloc sequences.

S5 Fig. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from an allignment of the EF1-α sequences.

S1 Table. Isolates and sampling sites characteristics.

S2 Table. Isolates agressivity evaluation using the Fungal Development Index (FDI).

S3 Table. Molecular markers used for B. bassiana characterization.

S4 Table. A list of characterized Beauveria isolates with their host and origin.

S5 Table. Biological characteristics of the obtained Beauveria bassiana isolates.

S6 Table. Changes in the biological parameters of the obtained Beauveria bassiana isolates.

References

S1 Fig. Probit analysis for calculating the lethal concentration of B. bassiana isolates (LC₅₀).

S2 Fig. Probit analysis for calculating the lethal time of B. bassiana isolates (LT₅₀).