Figures
The incorrect image appears as Fig 1. Please see the correct Fig 1 here.
(A–F): The views and estimated levels of a micro-CT scanned maxillary premolar. (A): maxillary premolar; (B): a sagittal view; (C): a frontal view; (D): a STL format model was developed.; (E): a–b: line connecting the buccal and lingual CEJ, c–d: line connecting the mesial and distal CEJ, e: midpoint of a–b, f: midpoint of c–d, g: midpoint of e–f and represented the CEJ from 2–D viewpoint, and g–h: represented the 2–D root length; (F): The root surface areas were calculated from 1st mm to 10th mm. (G–L): The views and evaluated levels of a micro-CT scanned mandibular premolar. (G): mandibular premolar; (H): a sagittal view; (I): a frontal view; (J): a STL format model was developed; (K): a–b: line connecting the buccal and lingual CEJ, c–d: line connecting the mesial and distal CEJ, e: midpoint of a–b, f: midpoint of c–d, g: midpoint of e–f and represented the CEJ from 2–D viewpoint, and g–h: represented the 2–D root length; (L): The root surface areas were calculated from 1st mm to 10th mm corono-apically.
Reference
- 1. Hong H-H, Hong A, Huang Y-F, Liu H-L (2018) Incompatible amount of 3-D and 2-D periodontal attachments on micro-CT scanned premolars. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0193894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193894 pmid:29518113
Citation: Hong H-H, Hong A, Huang Y-F, Liu H-L (2018) Correction: Incompatible amount of 3-D and 2-D periodontal attachments on micro-CT scanned premolars. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0209206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209206
Published: December 10, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Hong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.