Metabolomic investigations in cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson's disease

Desiree Willkommen; Marianna Lucio; Franco Moritz; Sara Forcisi; Basem Kanawati; Kirill S. Smirnov; Michael Schroeter; Ali Sigaroudi; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin; Bernhard Michalke

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208752

Abstract

The underlying mechanisms of Parkinson´s disease are not completely revealed. Especially, early diagnostic biomarkers are lacking. To characterize early pathophysiological events, research is focusing on metabolomics. In this case-control study we investigated the metabolic profile of 31 Parkinson´s disease-patients in comparison to 95 neurologically healthy controls. The investigation of metabolites in CSF was performed by a 12 Tesla SolariX Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance-mass spectrometer (FT-ICR-MS). Multivariate statistical analysis sorted the most important biomarkers in relation to their ability to differentiate Parkinson versus control. The affected metabolites, their connection and their conversion pathways are described by means of network analysis. The metabolic profiling by FT-ICR-MS in CSF yielded in a good group separation, giving insights into the disease mechanisms. A total number of 243 metabolites showed an affected intensity in Parkinson´s disease, whereas 15 of these metabolites seem to be the main biological contributors. The network analysis showed a connection to the tricarboxylic cycle (TCA cycle) and therefore to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress within mitochondria. The metabolomic analysis of CSF in Parkinson´s disease showed an association to pathways which are involved in lipid/ fatty acid metabolism, energy metabolism, glutathione metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Citation: Willkommen D, Lucio M, Moritz F, Forcisi S, Kanawati B, Smirnov KS, et al. (2018) Metabolomic investigations in cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson's disease. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0208752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752

Editor: Anna Halama, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, QATAR

Received: August 2, 2018; Accepted: November 21, 2018; Published: December 10, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Willkommen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: Michael Schroeter got personal compensation for talks and advisory boards by Biogen, Sanofi/Genzyme, Grifols, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Roche. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations: ARA, arachidonic acid; DG, diacylglycerol; DGLA, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid; ESI, electrospray ionization; ETC, electron transport chain; FT-ICR-MS, Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance-mass spectrometry; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; MDA, malondialdehyde; MDB, mass difference building block; MDEA, mass difference enrichment analysis; MDiN, mass difference network; m/z, mass-to-charge-ratio; OPLS-DA, Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structure-Discriminant Analysis; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PD, Parkinson´s disease; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, prostaglandin; PPE, protein precipitation extraction; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; ROS, reactive oxygen species; sPLS-DA, sparse Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid

Introduction

Parkinson´s disease (PD) is a severe neurodegenerative disease with a prevalence of 0.6% in 65 to 69 years old population that increases up to 3.5% in the population between 85 and 89 years old [1]. The clinical diagnosis relies on the typical cardinal symptoms: resting tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. Hallmark of pathophysiological events is the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons, but symptoms appear when at least 60–80% of dopaminergic neurons are lost [2]. Up to date, early diagnostic biomarkers are lacking [3], therefore emerging interest is moving towards metabolic changes due to disease. Consequently, recent research is focusing on metabolomics to uncover early metabolic events in PD by the use of different analytical technologies.

LeWitt et al. applied ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metabolome of 49 PD affected patients [4]. They identified prognostic plasma-biomarkers. Burté et al. identified, by MS-based techniques, 20 metabolites in human serum associated with PD and mild cognitive impairment [5]. The identified metabolites were mainly linked to the fatty acid oxidation pathway. A metabolic profiling approach was implemented for CSF by the use of NMR resulting in 15 metabolites, predominantly amino acids, which distinguished between PD and control [6]. The mouse brain metabolome of the disease manganism–a Mn-related Parkinsonian disease—was investigated by Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance-mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS) [7, 8], a MS-based technique that offers ultra-high resolution and mass accuracy. This technique allows for the concurrent detection of thousands of metabolites in a complex matrix [9] as well as the assignment of putative molecular formulas [10, 11] to each experimentally detected feature. Changes in amino acid, fatty acid, glutathione, glucose and purine/pyrimidine metabolisms were detected, showing an increase in oxidative stress and in inflammation markers [7, 8]. A recent review summarizes the results of metabolic profiling studies in Parkinson´s disease [12].

Generally, the metabolomics’ investigations can be targeted or non-targeted. A targeted investigation is restricted to a specific compound or a class of compounds whereas non-targeted analysis provides a comprehensive chemical characterization of a complex bio/chemical system [13]. The analysis by FT-ICR-MS is semi-quantitative and considers the intensity of each detected feature as a measure of their concentration. Therefore, this technique is suitable for the profile screening in a discovery oriented way. For the first time, to our knowledge, a non-targeted FT-ICR-MS was applied to get a not restricted deeper knowledge about the biochemical pathways involved in PD. A suitable liquid to reflect metabolomic changes in neurodegenerative diseases is CSF, which is in close contact to the brain [14, 15].

A machine learning approach sorted the most important compounds in relation to their ability to differentiate PD and control. An additional network analysis revealed mass differences of the selected, most important compounds for supplemental information about ongoing processes. Notably, the network analysis showed a connection to the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, to mitochondrial dysfunction, and increased oxidative stress within mitochondria. With this unique combination of metabolic profiling and network analysis, the investigations provided deeper insights into ongoing disease mechanisms and the major effectors of the disease. Especially oxidative stress (e.g. lipid peroxidation and changes in antioxidant compounds like glutathione) and neuroinflammation (e.g. arachidonic acid) are known to be involved in PD [16] and hence are the main focus of our investigation. Alterations may be due to primary disease processes as well as due to compensatory or reactive (e.g. inflammatory) mechanisms and epiphenomena.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

The purchased chemicals are: MeOH from CHROMASOLV LC-MS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and L-Arginine from Sigma Aldrich (>98% purity, St. Louis, USA).

Study participants

A total of 126 CSF-samples were taken by standardized lumbar puncture at the Cologne University Hospital and were originally not intended for scientific use, but stored in the biobank of the hospital. The procedure of lumbar puncture was performed without problems and patients recovered quickly. Thirty-one of the CSF-samples were taken from patients diagnosed with PD and 95 samples derived from neurologically healthy controls (Table 1). The control patients underwent lumbar puncture after neurological symptoms (e.g. headache, dizziness) to exclude diseases of the central nervous system. Regarding the medication of the PD-patients, the patients are divided into 18 patients without any PD-specific medication, 11 patients with PD-specific medication (one or more of the following drugs: L-dopa, Madopar, Clarium, Sifrol/Pramipexol, Azilect, amantadine, and Artane), and two patients had electrodes for deep brain stimulation.

Download:

Table 1. Characteristics of PD and controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.t001

After lumbar puncture the samples remained at room temperature up to 6 hours for routine diagnostics. Subsequently, the samples were stored at -20±1°C temporary and later at -80±1°C until measurement. The count of erythrocytes was determined in a semi-quantitative manner in a counting chamber (negative = no erythrocytes, isolated < 5 erythrocytes/μL, + < 90 erythrocytes/μL, ++ > 90 erythrocytes/μL, +++ > 350 erythrocytes/μL, plentiful = overlying erythrocyte layers). Only samples with negative or isolated erythrocytes were involved in the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Cologne (09.12.2014, no. 14–364). All patients consented to scientific use of their CSF-samples.

Sample preparation

Prior to FT-ICR-MS analyses a protein precipitation extraction (PPE) was performed. The protocol was adapted from Forcisi et al. [9]. The frozen CSF-samples were thawed on ice and vortex-mixed for 30 seconds prior to treatment. Ice-cold MeOH (320μl) was added to an 80 μL aliquot of each CSF sample. The samples were vortex-mixed for 30 s at room temperature and centrifuged at 18,900 g for 10 min at 4°C. The recovered supernatant was diluted (dil. factor: 1/70) in MeOH prior to FT-ICR-MS analysis.

FT-ICR-MS measurement

Ultrahigh resolution mass spectra were acquired by means of FT-ICR-MS (Solarix, Bruker, Bremen, Germany), equipped with a 12 Tesla superconducting magnet (Magnex Scientific, Varian Inc., Oxford, UK) and an electrospray ionization (ESI) source (Apollo II, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). An external calibration was performed by analysis of a 3 mg/L arginine solution in MeOH with calibration errors below 0.1 ppm. All measurements were performed in negative ionization mode and ion accumulation time of 300 ms for higher sensitivity. The injection flow rate was 2 uL/min for electrospray. Operating temperature was 180°C for rapid solvent evaporation inside the electrospray. The ESI nebulizer gas flow rate was 2 L/min and the dry gas flow rate 4 L/min. The spectra were recorded in a mass-to-charge-ratio (m/z) range of 123–1000. For the generation of each mass spectrum 300 scans were acquired. A time-domain transient of 4 MW size was produced for each acquisition, which yielded ultra-high resolution for all signals, which are of metabolomic interest.

Data pre-treatment and statistics

The spectra were calibrated with an in-house calibration tool developed in Matlab (Release 2016a, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, US). The main principle is based on estimating the most probable calibration curve given the density map describing the behavior of a mass accuracy along the considered mass range. The extracted peaks were aligned within a 1 ppm tolerance window and stored in a data matrix [17]. The masses with a frequency below 10% were not considered during further data mining, the intensities of absent masses were set to zero in the related samples. We applied the in-house developed software Netcalc to remove potential spectral noise and isotope peaks. This software assigns molecular formulas to the aligned m/z-peaks based on a mass difference between the detected features [18]. Moreover, additional annotation was performed using the web server MassTRIX [19, 20] with Homo sapiens as reference organism. All annotations were stored in the original data matrix. The assignment of a molecular formula to each m/z values was performed by molecular formula propagation through mass difference networks (MDiN). Here, m/z features (nodes) were connected by mass differences (edges) with corresponding molecular formula labels (e.g. Δm/z = 14.01565 → ΔCH₂) and random walks starting from known peaks updated the molecular formulas of yet unassigned m/z peaks. The network was optimized to correct conflicting relationships and to closely follow the intrinsic m/z-error distribution of a spectrum for which reason this so-called Netcalc-algorithm is considered as an unsupervised filter that reduces the data size and reveals an underlying biochemical network structure inside the data set [21]. In order to improve the efficiency of the classification (Parkinson versus controls) and reduce possible overfitting and noise, we preprocessed the entire dataset applying the ReliefF algorithm [22]. The algorithm identified a subset of variables (in total 243 masses) that was able to maximize the classification accuracy of the subsequent classification models. The features’ selection was based on the highest rank value attributed to each variable by the software. For each masses (stored in the S2 Table) we reported, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV). A sparse Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (sPLS-DA) was built in order to assign the respective metabolites for each class from the list of 243 masses. sPLS-DA imposes sparseness within the latent components to improve variables selection while performing simultaneous dimension reduction. A 7-fold cross-validation together with the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was chosen to evaluate the classification performance. For this model, the Balanced Error Rate (BER) has been calculated to evaluate the performances. BER is appropriate in case of an unbalanced number of samples per class as it calculates the average proportion of wrongly classified samples in each class [23]. For the classification model we used the MixOmics package and for the values presented in S2 Table (sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) we have used reportROC package (RStudio Version 1.0.136 – 2009–2016 RStudio, Inc.) Moreover, an Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) model was applied to have another classification model and to describe the orthogonal variance. The performance of the fit and the prediction were evaluated with the R² and Q² values. Moreover, we provide the p-value for Analysis of Variance of Cross-Validation Estimators. Those elaborations were done in SIMCA 13.0.3.0 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden).

For the most important metabolites we did an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) testing the significance for the interactions of the factor (Parkinson vs. control) with age and also with gender. Then we calculated all the p-values (adjusted by Dunnett test) of the differences between Parkinson vs. control (being an unbalanced experimental design we chose to compare the least squares means) controlled by gender (listed in Table 2). The elaboration was done using the general linear model (GLM) analysis in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Download:

Table 2. Most important neutral masses to distinguish between PD and controls with respective molecular formula, possible compounds assignment and mean intensity ± standard deviation (SD).

The p-values are the result of the general linear model (GLM) adjusted with DUNNET.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.t002

Additionally, a mass difference enrichment analysis (MDEA) was performed following Moritz et al. [24]. The list of mass difference building blocks (Δm), investigated for enrichment with PD-markers, was obtained from the supporting material of the same publication [24]. The network was reconstructed on the full set of features with molecular formula assignment, including the 243 differentially regulated features (features selected with the ReliefF algorithm). The complete detected metabolome is assumed to provide the substrates for the (bio-) synthesis of these 243 disease markers. MDEA tests which Δm’s (biochemical reactions) connect markers to the remaining metabolome and therewith highlights probable reactions of biomarker synthesis [24, 25]. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate enrichment, resulting in Z-Scores and p-values. The Z-scores of Z ≈ 2 and Z ≈ 2.5 relate to p ≈ 0.05 and p ≈ 0.01, respectively. This way, MDEA addresses the differential usage patterns of molecular building blocks in the biosynthesis of PD- and Control-markers.

Results

The metabolic profiles of 31 Parkinson-patients and 95 controls were analyzed by FT-ICR-MS. A features selection was performed after the annotation of elemental formulas of the respective m/z-values in the generated data matrix. The feature selection excluded a part of the data noise and the information not related to the study design (Parkinson vs. control). The subset of variables calculated with such algorithm was reduced to 243 m/z values. Consecutively, we wanted to test if the list of 243 m/z was capable to separate the two groups under investigation. We built a sPLS-DA analysis (Fig 1A) and an OPLS-DA (Fig 1B). Both were able to separate controls from diseased individuals [26]. This separation was even clearer with the OPLS-DA analysis, showing good values for the fitting and prediction (R²Y(cum) = 0.98 and Q²(cum) = 0.53. The cross validation Anova gave a p-value < 0.0001). The OPLS-DA explained 32% of variance with the first two components (the sPLS-DA explained with the three main components 16% of variance). The values of the Balanced Error Rate (BER) for the sPLS-DA model are in the supplementary S5 Table. Moreover, we have observed that in both plots (1A and 1B) the youngest patients do not cluster all together. In the clustering, we didn’t find any trends for the age, meaning that the factor that drives the separation is related with the health status of the person. Among the 243 masses, we found 81 metabolites with decreasing and 162 metabolites with increasing signal intensities for PD samples relative to controls (Fig 1C), according with both models (S2 Table). The highest loadings values were chosen as the most explicative variables in the class separation. Fig 1D represents the ROC curve calculated from the first component of the sPLS-DA analysis. The ROC curve, calculated on the 243 subset of masses confirmed that this list could be optimal for the discrimination of the two groups. Moreover, Fig 1E represents the performance plot. It is based on t-tests for significant difference in the mean error rate between components. The error rate after the second components seems to be stabilized. Therefore, two components are sufficient to achieve a good performance.

Download:

Fig 1. The implemented statistical analysis models.

A) sPLS-DA and B) OPLS-DA both validated with 7 fold cross-validation, C) compounds, which significantly distinguished PD from controls, D) and E) represented the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the classification error rates by which the number of components was tuned (7 cross-validation), F) compared intensities of selected lipids. expl. var., explorative variance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.g001

From the subset of metabolites we investigated only the possible assigned with the KEGG database (in total are 32). Among those 32 candidates, we presented in Table 2 the most relevant from a biological point of view (all possible assignments for these most relevant metabolites are listed in S3 Table). Most of the affected compounds derived from the compound class of lipids (decanoic acid, 10-hydroxydecanoic acid, arachidonic acid, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, diacylglycerol (DG), phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)). Additionally, sugar derivatives and carboxylic acids were affected.

Moreover, an ANCOVA analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of age and gender on the results. The analysis did not reveal any significant interactions between age and the main factor (Parkinson vs. control) for each of the metabolites presented in Table 2. The only significant interaction was found for gender for the Arachidonic acid (p = 0.003).

Based on the feature selection and the classification models results, the entire dataset (S1 Table) was analyzed by a network approach. The network was build up by connecting exact m/z-features (nodes) using mass differences (Δm) that were derived from biochemical reactions as demonstrated in Fig 2A for the conversion of 2-Ketosuccinate to 2-Ketoglutarate. The Δm’s are characterized by Z-scores, which represent the increase or decrease of a Δm’s occurrence with significantly regulated metabolic features (all the z-scores are listed in S4 Table). Fig 2B illustrates the over-represented Δm s in PD. Different compounds, involved in the cellular respiration processes namely the TCA cycle, were observed increased in PD. These compounds, which are part of the TCA cycle like α-ketoglutarate and pyruvate, were increased, but also substrates for the synthesis of compounds of the TCA cycle like amino acids and break-down products of several TCA-compounds were found over-represented in PD. Additionally, the compounds lipoic acid and vitamin B3 are over-represented MDBs, which are important for the function of pyruvate dehydrogenase.

Download:

Fig 2.

A) theory behind the network analysis shown for a specific example, B), over-represented Δm for PD as characterized by respective Z-scores.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.g002

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the metabolic profile of CSF-samples from PD patients and controls. Our approach used CSF-samples to investigate the changes due to disease. CSF is a suitable biofluids to investigate changes in neurodegenerative diseases, because it is in close contact to the brain. This biofluids is in direct contact to the extracellular space of brain parenchyma [14] and therefore metabolic changes within brain are likely to be reflected in CSF [15]. In contrast to more common targeted analysis like LC-MS, this non-targeted FT-ICR-MS analysis can be used to create new hypotheses, to evaluate as much compounds as possible, and to compare results with other metabolomic investigations already done in PD. The main aim of non-targeted determination by FT-ICR-MS is the spectral profile comparison of healthy and diseased state. Targeted approaches need a prior hypothesis, e.g. a specific compound class to determine, since only a part of the metabolome can be quantified. This application has major advantages when selected compounds have to be measured and can be used as a follow up to non-targeted methods. It has to be clear, that none of the existing techniques can cover all metabolites [27]. Therefore, to get a complete and comprehensive metabolite overview it is necessary to use several techniques and methods to cover as much metabolites as possible.

As hypothesized, we revealed several altered metabolites in PD as compared to controls. Specifically, metabolites belonging to the lipid/ fatty acid, glutathione, and energy metabolism showed a strong shift. Especially the increased level of the fatty acid arachidonic acid is associated with increased oxidative stress and neuroinflammation [28–30].

Age and gender are important factors in metabolic balance [31–33]. The patient groups investigated within this study are not matched for age and gender. Therefore, an ANCOVA was performed to evaluate the influence of both factors on the differentiation of PD and control-patients. For the parameter age we couldn´t find any influence on the most significant metabolites detected in the CSF samples. In contrast to age, the differentiation between PD and control for arachidonic acid is also related to the gender. The interaction between the gender and the variable (PD vs. control) is significant (p = 0.003). A gender influence on arachidonic acid concentration was also ascertained by a meta-analysis of 51 publications. This gender influence was not true for other investigated fatty acids [34]. Moreover, 11 PD-patients received PD-specific medication, 2 patients had electrodes and 18 patients didn´t have a medication at the time point of sample taking. Since medication of patients is too diverse this covariate was not taken into consideration.

Statistical models were applied to the achieved mass spectra for calibration. All the models gave an overall agreement, isolating a common list of important masses altered in the two different groups. The statistical analysis models sPLS-DA and OPLS-DA confirmed the good group separation according to principal components 1 and 2. Moreover, the area under the curve (ROC) showed also a high performance of the classification model, since it was calculated based on the predicted scores [23]. Additionally, the statistical analysis provided an insight into the biological characterization of PD, and the consequent confirmation of some biomarkers in the literature which are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Glutathione metabolism

5-Oxoproline is an oxidation product and therefore elevated levels are a sign of increased oxidation. It is also associated with oxidative stress [35]. 5-Oxoproline is a part of the γ-glutamyl-cycle and thus it is implicated in glutathione (GSH) -metabolism. GSH is a protective compound against oxidative stress by oxidizing to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) with simultaneous reduction of H₂O₂ [36]. A higher rate of GSH-biosynthesis is associated with decreased oxidative stress but also with higher need to remove reactive oxygen species (ROS). GSH is depleted with increasing age [37] and in neurodegeneration, especially decreased values were found in substantia nigra [38–40] and CSF [41] of PD-patients. In contrast to this, increased levels of GSH have been found in an early stage of disease, possibly for protection against further oxidative stress [37, 42]. Increased concentrations of 5-oxoproline were found in plasma of PD-patients [43]. Additionally, Wu et al. [44] found an increased urinary excretion of 5-oxoproline to be associated with a reduced availability of cysteine and glycine and hence reduced GSH-biosynthesis in vivo. A reduced GSH-biosynthesis is followed by accumulation of ROS after a short time and causes neurodegeneration. Although we did not measure GSH itself, the increased 5-oxoproline content we have found in PD seems to be associated to protection against oxidative stress in an early disease progress (duration of disease: 0.87 years).

Energy metabolism

Metabolites belonging to the energy metabolism were found within our study. We discovered increased intensities of D-glucose-6-sulfate and α-mannosylglycerate and decreased intensity of sedoheptulose in CSF of PD-patients. The metabolite α-mannosylglycerate is part of the fructose and mannose metabolism, two compounds which were also found to be increased in CSF of PD-patients [45]. These metabolites are also linked to glycolysis [46], which is increased in conditions of oxidative stress to suppress oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria [47]. In concordance with these increased concentrations of metabolites of the fructose and mannose pathways, Ahmed et al. found another metabolite linked with this pathway. Increased concentrations of sorbitol were found in plasma of PD-patients. Additionally, Michell et al. identified increased intensity of several monosaccharides in serum [48]. The used method was not able to further differentiate in specific monosaccharides. Moreover, a study investigating especially the changes of energy metabolism in dopaminergic cells after exposure to environmental/ mitochondrial toxins (model for PD) was performed [49]. They found increased concentrations of sedoheptulose and the hexoses glucose and myoinositol. Although the direction of some shifted metabolites is inconclusive comparing the studies, a clear hint to changes in the energy metabolism due to PD is given and needs further investigation.

Fatty acids and lipid metabolism

Our investigations showed several fatty acids to be altered in PD. Quinic acid, decanoic acid, 10-hydroxydecanoic acid, valerenic acid, arachidonic acid, and dihomo-γ-linolenic acid were found with increased intensities in PD. The lipid metabolism compounds DG, PC, and PE had decreased intensities in PD. Medium and long chain fatty acids (5-dodecanoate, 3-hydroxydecanoate, docosadienoate, and docosatrienoate) were also found increased in biofluids (plasma, CSF) of PD-patients by use of non-targeted metabolomic approaches [4]. Other studies also found alterations in fatty acid composition, although with decreasing intensity in PD. Trupp et al. found decreasing C16 and C18 fatty acids in plasma of PD patients [43] and Michell et al. decreased amount of octenoic acid in serum [48] indicating a possible inverse behavior of fatty acids in CSF and serum/plasma.

Especially DGLA and arachidonic acid (ARA) were investigated several times in various body fluids. Both compounds are polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) present in human brain. PUFAs are vulnerable to oxidative stress due to lipid peroxidation [28, 50]. DGLA can form either anti-inflammatory compounds or pro-inflammatory ARA. Additionally, ARA is bound to membranes in brain; it is released enzymatically upon inflammation [51]. We found an increased content of DGLA and ARA in CSF of PD, which implies an elevation in pro-inflammatory characteristics. The enzymatic oxidation of ARA forms multiple pro-inflammatory metabolites [51]. A study investigated the development of the prostaglandins (PG) PGE₁ and PGE₂ (anti-inflammatory/ pro-inflammatory) after dietary DGLA intake in rat plasma [52]. The PGE₁-level and the PGE₂-level increased after DGLA-administration, but PGE₁ increase was much higher. This finding is linked to increased anti-inflammatory capacity, at least at the beginning of disease. The ARA metabolism is strictly regulated in normal brain, but any misbalance due to neuroinflammation or oxidative stress can increase ARA metabolism in the brain and can finally cause neurodegeneration [53]. Julien et al. [54] investigated the fatty acid profile in postmortem brain of PD and in parkinsonian monkeys by gas chromatography. They focused on fatty acids in the cortex of the brain and found a significant elevation of ARA in humans and in monkeys after administration of the drug levodopa. ARA signaling was also found to be increased in a rat model with PD [30]. Thereby, an up-regulation of the cytosolic phospholipase A₂ was found in cortex and putamen in affected rats, which is associated with elevated neuroinflammation in the brains of diseased subjects. A disease-orientated investigation studied the metabolic changes in rat brain after an intravenous Mn-injection. K. Neth et al. [7] found decreased DGLA-levels and nine other fatty acids and an increase in the lipid mediators PGB₁, 15-(S)-HETE and Resolvin D2, which are associated with inflammation. Our investigation showed also a significant increase of DGLA and ARA in PD (Fig 1F), which can be associated with neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Although our results showed no marked increase in the pro-inflammatory lipid mediators, arachidonic acid seems to have a higher release from membranes due to inflammatory processes.

Additional information about reactions was provided by MDEA. The MDEA analysis showed reactions with malondialdehyde (MDA)-production over-represented in PD. A direct detection of MDA by FT-ICR-MS is impossible because of too small molecular weight and the labile character of the compound. MDA is a marker for oxidative stress and a break-down product of PUFAs. Therefore, MDA is also involved in lipid peroxidation. Several studies identified MDA as marker of PD [55]. They found increased MDA levels in plasma in an early and late disease stages. Significantly increased MDA levels in PD compared to controls were also found in erythrocytes [56] and in plasma [57]. A recent review gives an overview of the MDA-metabolism [28].

Mitochondrial dysfunction

Mitochondrial dysfunction is known to be involved in PD [58, 59]. Mitochondria produce the majority of cellular energy by oxidative phosphorylation. The 243 masses which differentiated controls and PD patients were further analyzed by MDEA to get an insight into processes involved in the disease. MDEA connected the masses within a network with specific mass differences explaining biochemical reactions and compared the abundance of each biochemical reaction in controls and PD. Our results showed over-represented metabolites associated with the TCA-cycle, as illustrated in Fig 3. We found compounds of the TCA-cycle over-represented (colored orange in Fig 3), compounds which are mandatory to synthesize compounds of the TCA-cycle (colored red in Fig 3) and also break-down products of several TCA-cycle compounds (colored purple in Fig 3). Mitochondrial dysfunction is primarily caused by ROS generated within mitochondria, but also metabolic dysregulation [60, 61]. Various metabolomic studies found altered metabolites of the TCA cycle within analysis. An increased concentration of malate in plasma of PD-patients was found by [43] and an increased concentration of citrate in CSF by [6]. In contrast to these observations, Ahmed et al. found decreased levels of several TCA metabolites (citrate, malate, succinate, and isocitrate) in plasma [62]. The inconsistent results may be due to differing sample matrix, sampling, storage and methods used and need further clarification. Apart from the compounds within the TCA cycle, different proteins, metals and other metabolites are needed for the synthesis and function of mitochondrial enzymes. Key nutrients are iron, manganese, copper, zinc, vitamin B3 and lipoic acid [63]. The metals are important central atoms in proteins, lipoic acid and vitamin B3 are important for the function of pyruvate dehydrogenase; the enzyme catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate. An analysis of CSF with capillary zone electrophoresis hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry shows the compounds fumarate, malate, oxaloacetate, α-ketoglutarate, citrate and NAD, which a part of the TCA-cycle, to be associated with manganese [64]. A change of associated transition metal to the metabolites could be an amplifying factor for increased oxidative stress in PD and also for mitochondrial dysfunction. A dysregulation of the metals iron, copper, manganese, and zinc was already found within these sample-set [65]. Thereby a dysregulation of specific ratios between different mass fractions of these metals were found to be significantly different in PD and controls. A correlation of shifted metal concentrations and metal ratios with TCA cycle compound could be beneficial to get further information regarding the relationship between metals and metabolites.

Download:

Fig 3. Over-represented metabolites within the TCA cycle.

Metabolites directly found with network analysis are colored orange. Metabolites indirectly found either by substrates for synthesis of the respective compound (colored red) or by break-down products of the respective compound (colored purple).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.g003

Conclusion

In conclusion, the pipeline we used gave us an understanding of the unknown space investigated. We found several metabolites in CSF of PD and controls by using the untargeted metabolomics technique FT-ICR-MS. Due to the use of multivariate statistical analysis a differentiation between PD and controls was possible. Especially metabolites of the lipid metabolism showed up to be affected due to disease. Moreover, indices of mitochondrial dysfunction and alterations of the energy metabolism were found in PD. More research effort should be directed to targeted approaches to unravel the lipid metabolism pathways affected in PD. Additionally, correlation of metal-analysis with TCA cycle products may enable further insights into disease mechanisms.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Raw data of non-targeted metabolomic investigation in CSF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.s001

(XLS)

S2 Table. Important masses detected with the ReliefF features selection algorithm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.s002

(XLS)

S3 Table. Most important neutral masses to distinguish between Parkinson´s disease and controls with all possible assignments to respective masses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.s003

(DOC)

S4 Table. Summary of network analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.s004

(XLS)

S5 Table. Balanced Error Rate (BER).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208752.s005

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the principal investigator of this study Prof. Uwe Fuhr.

References

1. de Rijk MC, Tzourio C, Breteler MM, Dartigues JF, Amaducci L, Lopez-Pousa S, et al. Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson's disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study. European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1997;62(1):10–5. Epub 1997/01/01. pmid:9010393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC486688.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Miller DB, O'Callaghan JP. Biomarkers of Parkinson's disease: present and future. Metabolism. 2015;64(3 Suppl 1):S40–6. pmid:25510818; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4721253.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Andersen AD, Binzer M, Stenager E, Gramsbergen JB. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Parkinson's disease–a systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(1):34–56. pmid:26991855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. LeWitt PA, Li J, Lu M, Guo L, Auinger P. Metabolomic biomarkers as strong correlates of Parkinson disease progression. Neurology. 2017;88(9):862–9. pmid:28179471
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Burté F, Houghton D, Lowes H, Pyle A, Nesbitt S, Yarnall A, et al. metabolic profiling of Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Mov Disord. 2017;32(6):927–32. pmid:28394042
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Wu J, Wuolikainen A, Trupp M, Jonsson P, Marklund SL, Andersen PM, et al. NMR analysis of the CSF and plasma metabolome of rigorously matched amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and control subjects. Metabolomics. 2016;12(6):101. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Neth K, Lucio M, Walker A, Zorn J, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Michalke B. Changes in Brain Metallome/Metabolome Pattern due to a Single i.v. Injection of Manganese in Rats. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138270. pmid:26383269; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4575095.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Neth K, Lucio M, Walker A, Kanawati B, Zorn J, Schmitt-Kopplin P, et al. Diverse Serum Manganese Species Affect Brain Metabolites Depending on Exposure Conditions. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28(7):1434–42. pmid:26024413.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Forcisi S, Moritz F, Lucio M, Lehmann R, Stefan N, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Solutions for low and high accuracy mass spectrometric data matching: a data-driven annotation strategy in nontargeted metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2015;87(17):8917–24. pmid:26197019.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Breitling R, Pitt AR, Barrett MP. Precision mapping of the metabolome. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24(12):543–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.006. pmid:17064801
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Breitling R, Ritchie S, Goodenowe D, Stewart ML, Barrett MP. Ab initio prediction of metabolic networks using Fourier transform mass spectrometry data. Metabolomics. 2006;2(3):155–64. pmid:24489532
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Havelund J, Heegaard N, Færgeman N, Gramsbergen J. Biomarker Research in Parkinson’s Disease Using Metabolite Profiling. Metabolites. 2017;7(3):42. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Smirnov KS, Maier TV, Walker A, Heinzmann SS, Forcisi S, Martinez I, et al. Challenges of metabolomics in human gut microbiota research. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016;306(5):266–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.03.006. pmid:27012595
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, Zetterberg H. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(3):131–44. pmid:20157306.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Michalke B, Berthele A. Contribution to selenium speciation in cerebrospinal fluid samples. J Anal At Spectrom. 2011;26(1):165–70. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Alonso-Navarro H, Garcia-Martin E, Agundez JA. Cerebrospinal fluid biochemical studies in patients with Parkinson's disease: toward a potential search for biomarkers for this disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:369. pmid:25426023; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4227512.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Lucio M, Fekete A, Frommberger M, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Metabolomics: High-Resolution Tools Offer to Follow Bacterial Growth on a Molecular Level. Handbook of Molecular Microbial Ecology I: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. p. 683–95.
18. Tziotis D, Hertkorn N, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Kendrick-analogous network visualisation of ion cyclotron resonance Fourier transform mass spectra: improved options for the assignment of elemental compositions and the classification of organic molecular complexity. Eur J Mass Spectrom. 2011;17(4):415–21. Epub 2011/10/19. pmid:22006638.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Suhre K, Schmitt-Kopplin P. MassTRIX: mass translator into pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(suppl_2):W481–W4. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Wagele B, Witting M, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Suhre K. MassTRIX reloaded: combined analysis and visualization of transcriptome and metabolome data. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39860. pmid:22815716; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3391204.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Liu Y, Smirnov K, Lucio M, Gougeon RD, Alexandre H, Schmitt-Kopplin P. MetICA: independent component analysis for high-resolution mass-spectrometry based non-targeted metabolomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17(1):114. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA, Pal C. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Fourth Edition. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. xxxii, 621 pages p.
23. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao K-A. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLOS Computational Biology. 2017;13(11):e1005752. pmid:29099853
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Moritz F, Kaling M, Schnitzler JP, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Characterization of poplar metabotypes via mass difference enrichment analysis. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(7):1057–73. Epub 2016/12/13. pmid:27943315.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Kaling M, Schmidt A, Moritz F, Rosenkranz M, Witting M, Kasper K, et al. Mycorrhiza-Triggered Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Networks Impinge on Herbivore Fitness. Plant Physiology. 2018;176(4):2639–56. pmid:29439210
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Lê Cao K-A, Boitard S, Besse P. Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problems. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:253-. PubMed PMID: PMC3133555. pmid:21693065
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Wishart DS, Lewis MJ, Morrissey JA, Flegel MD, Jeroncic K, Xiong Y, et al. The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome. Journal of Chromatography B. 2008;871(2):164–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.05.001.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Ayala A, Munoz MF, Arguelles S. Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:360438. pmid:24999379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4066722.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Rapoport SI. Arachidonic Acid and the Brain. J Nutr. 2008;138(12):2515–20. pmid:19022981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3415870.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Lee HJ, Bazinet RP, Rapoport SI, Bhattacharjee AK. Brain arachidonic acid cascade enzymes are upregulated in a rat model of unilateral Parkinson disease. Neurochem Res. 2010;35(4):613–9. pmid:19997776; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2836388.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Yoshii F, Barker WW, Chang JY, Loewenstein D, Apicella A, Smith D, et al. Sensitivity of Cerebral Glucose Metabolism to Age, Gender, Brain Volume, Brain Atrophy, and Cerebrovascular Risk Factors. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 1988;8(5):654–61. pmid:3417794.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Molnar D, Schutz Y. The effect of obesity, age, puberty and gender on resting metabolic rate in children and adolescents. European journal of pediatrics. 1997;156(5):376–81. Epub 1997/05/01. pmid:9177980.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Lazzer S, Bedogni G, Lafortuna CL, Marazzi N, Busti C, Galli R, et al. Relationship Between Basal Metabolic Rate, Gender, Age, and Body Composition in 8,780 White Obese Subjects. Obesity. 2010;18(1):71–8. pmid:19478787
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Lohner S, Fekete K, Marosvolgyi T, Decsi T. Gender differences in the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status: systematic review of 51 publications. Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2013;62(2):98–112. Epub 2013/01/19. pmid:23327902.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Cassol E, Misra V, Dutta A, Morgello S, Gabuzda D. Cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics reveals altered waste clearance and accelerated aging in HIV patients with neurocognitive impairment. AIDS. 2014;28(11):1579–91. pmid:24752083; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4086755.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Aoyama K, Nakaki T. Impaired glutathione synthesis in neurodegeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(10):21021–44. pmid:24145751; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3821656.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Maher P. The effects of stress and aging on glutathione metabolism. Ageing Res Rev. 2005;4(2):288–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2005.02.005. pmid:15936251
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, Daniel S, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Glutathione-related enzymes in brain in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(3):356–61. pmid:8080243.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, Daniel S, Agid Y, Javoy-Agid F, et al. Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(3):348–55. pmid:8080242.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Pearce RKB, Owen A, Daniel S, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Alterations in the distribution of glutathione in the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. Journal of neural transmission. 1997;104(6):661–77. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. LeWitt PA, Li J, Lu M, Beach TG, Adler CH, Guo L, et al. 3-hydroxykynurenine and other Parkinson's disease biomarkers discovered by metabolomic analysis. Mov Disord. 2013;28(12):1653–60. pmid:23873789.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Rae CD. A Guide to the Metabolic Pathways and Function of Metabolites Observed in Human Brain 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectra. Neurochem Res. 2014;39(1):1–36. pmid:24258018
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Trupp M, Jonsson P, Ohrfelt A, Zetterberg H, Obudulu O, Malm L, et al. Metabolite and peptide levels in plasma and CSF differentiating healthy controls from patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(3):549–60. pmid:24927756.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Wu G, Fang Y-Z, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND. Glutathione Metabolism and Its Implications for Health. J Nutr. 2004;134(3):489–92. pmid:14988435
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Trezzi JP, Galozzi S, Jaeger C, Barkovits K, Brockmann K, Maetzler W, et al. Distinct metabolomic signature in cerebrospinal fluid in early parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2017;32(10):1401–8. pmid:28843022.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Izumi Y, Zorumski CF. Glial–neuronal interactions underlying fructose utilization in rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience. 2009;161(3):847–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.008. pmid:19362122
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Mazzio E, Soliman KFA. The Role of Glycolysis and Gluconeogenesis in the Cytoprotection of Neuroblastoma Cells against 1-Methyl 4-Phenylpyridinium Ion Toxicity. NeuroToxicology. 2003;24(1):137–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-813X(02)00110-9. pmid:12564389
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Michell AW, Mosedale D, Grainger DJ, Barker RA. Metabolomic analysis of urine and serum in Parkinson’s disease. Metabolomics. 2008;4(3):191. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Lei S, Zavala-Flores L, Garcia-Garcia A, Nandakumar R, Huang Y, Madayiputhiya N, et al. Alterations in Energy/Redox Metabolism Induced by Mitochondrial and Environmental Toxins: A Specific Role for Glucose-6-Phosphate-Dehydrogenase and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway in Paraquat Toxicity. ACS Chemical Biology. 2014;9(9):2032–48. pmid:24937102
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Liu X, Yamada N, Maruyama W, Osawa T. Formation of dopamine adducts derived from brain polyunsaturated fatty acids: mechanism for Parkinson disease. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(50):34887–95. pmid:18922792; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3259879.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Bazinet RP, Laye S. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites in brain function and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(12):771–85. pmid:25387473.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Umeda-Sawada R, Fujiwara Y, Ushiyama I, Sagawa S, Morimitsu Y, Kawashima H, et al. Distribution and metabolism of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA, 20:3n-6) by oral supplementation in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70(9):2121–30. pmid:16960355.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Bosetti F. Arachidonic Acid Metabolism in Brain Physiology and Pathology: Lessons from Genetically Altered Mouse Models. J Neurochem. 2007;102(3):577–86. PubMed PMID: PMC2084377. pmid:17403135
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Julien C, Berthiaume L, Hadj-Tahar A, Rajput AH, Bedard PJ, Di Paolo T, et al. Postmortem brain fatty acid profile of levodopa-treated Parkinson disease patients and parkinsonian monkeys. Neurochem Int. 2006;48(5):404–14. pmid:16442670.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. de Farias CC, Maes M, Bonifácio KL, Bortolasci CC, de Souza Nogueira A, Brinholi FF, et al. Highly specific changes in antioxidant levels and lipid peroxidation in Parkinson’s disease and its progression: Disease and staging biomarkers and new drug targets. Neurosci Lett. 2016;617(Supplement C):66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.011.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Sunday O, Adekunle M, Temitope O, Richard A, Samuel A, Olufunminyi A, et al. Alteration in antioxidants level and lipid peroxidation of patients with neurodegenerative diseases {Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson disease}. Int J Nutr Pharm Neurol Dis. 2014;4(3):146–52. .
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Sanyal J, Bandyopadhyay SK, Banerjee TK, Mukherjee SC, Chakraborty DP, Ray BC, et al. Plasma levels of lipid peroxides in patients with Parkinson's disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009;13(2):129–32. Epub 2009/06/09. pmid:19499848.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Anandhan A, Jacome MS, Lei S, Hernandez-Franco P, Pappa A, Panayiotidis MI, et al. Metabolic Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease: Bioenergetics, Redox Homeostasis and Central Carbon Metabolism. Brain Res Bull. 2017;133:12–30. pmid:28341600; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5555796.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Schapira AHV, Cooper JM, Dexter D, Clark JB, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Mitochondrial Complex I Deficiency in Parkinson's Disease. J Neurochem. 1990;54(3):823–7. pmid:2154550
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Pieczenik SR, Neustadt J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and molecular pathways of disease. Exp Mol Pathol. 2007;83(1):84–92. PubMed PMID: WOS:000247716800013. pmid:17239370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Moon HE, Paek SH. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease. Exp Neurobiol. 2015;24(2):103–16. PubMed PMID: PMC4479806. pmid:26113789
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Ahmed SS, Santosh W, Kumar S, Christlet HT. Metabolic profiling of Parkinson's disease: evidence of biomarker from gene expression analysis and rapid neural network detection. Journal of biomedical science. 2009;16:63. Epub 2009/07/15. pmid:19594911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2720938.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Ames BN, Atamna H, Killilea DW. Mineral and vitamin deficiencies can accelerate the mitochondrial decay of aging. Mol Aspects Med. 2005;26(4–5):363–78. Epub 2005/08/17. pmid:16102804.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Michalke B, Berthele A, Mistriotis P, Ochsenkühn-Petropoulou M, Halbach S. Manganese speciation in human cerebrospinal fluid using CZE coupled to inductively coupled plasma MS. Electrophoresis. 2007;28(9):1380–6. pmid:17377947
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Willkommen D, Lucio M, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Gazzaz M, Schroeter M, Sigaroudi A, et al. Species fractionation in a case-control study concerning Parkinson’s disease: Cu-amino acids discriminate CSF of PD from controls. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.01.005.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. de Rijk MC, Tzourio C, Breteler MM, Dartigues JF, Amaducci L, Lopez-Pousa S, et al. Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson's disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study. European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1997;62(1):10–5. Epub 1997/01/01. pmid:9010393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC486688.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Miller DB, O'Callaghan JP. Biomarkers of Parkinson's disease: present and future. Metabolism. 2015;64(3 Suppl 1):S40–6. pmid:25510818; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4721253.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Andersen AD, Binzer M, Stenager E, Gramsbergen JB. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Parkinson's disease–a systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(1):34–56. pmid:26991855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. LeWitt PA, Li J, Lu M, Guo L, Auinger P. Metabolomic biomarkers as strong correlates of Parkinson disease progression. Neurology. 2017;88(9):862–9. pmid:28179471
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Burté F, Houghton D, Lowes H, Pyle A, Nesbitt S, Yarnall A, et al. metabolic profiling of Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Mov Disord. 2017;32(6):927–32. pmid:28394042
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Wu J, Wuolikainen A, Trupp M, Jonsson P, Marklund SL, Andersen PM, et al. NMR analysis of the CSF and plasma metabolome of rigorously matched amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and control subjects. Metabolomics. 2016;12(6):101. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Neth K, Lucio M, Walker A, Zorn J, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Michalke B. Changes in Brain Metallome/Metabolome Pattern due to a Single i.v. Injection of Manganese in Rats. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138270. pmid:26383269; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4575095.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Neth K, Lucio M, Walker A, Kanawati B, Zorn J, Schmitt-Kopplin P, et al. Diverse Serum Manganese Species Affect Brain Metabolites Depending on Exposure Conditions. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28(7):1434–42. pmid:26024413.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Forcisi S, Moritz F, Lucio M, Lehmann R, Stefan N, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Solutions for low and high accuracy mass spectrometric data matching: a data-driven annotation strategy in nontargeted metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2015;87(17):8917–24. pmid:26197019.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Breitling R, Pitt AR, Barrett MP. Precision mapping of the metabolome. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24(12):543–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.006. pmid:17064801
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Breitling R, Ritchie S, Goodenowe D, Stewart ML, Barrett MP. Ab initio prediction of metabolic networks using Fourier transform mass spectrometry data. Metabolomics. 2006;2(3):155–64. pmid:24489532
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Havelund J, Heegaard N, Færgeman N, Gramsbergen J. Biomarker Research in Parkinson’s Disease Using Metabolite Profiling. Metabolites. 2017;7(3):42. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Smirnov KS, Maier TV, Walker A, Heinzmann SS, Forcisi S, Martinez I, et al. Challenges of metabolomics in human gut microbiota research. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016;306(5):266–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.03.006. pmid:27012595
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Blennow K, Hampel H, Weiner M, Zetterberg H. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(3):131–44. pmid:20157306.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Michalke B, Berthele A. Contribution to selenium speciation in cerebrospinal fluid samples. J Anal At Spectrom. 2011;26(1):165–70. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Alonso-Navarro H, Garcia-Martin E, Agundez JA. Cerebrospinal fluid biochemical studies in patients with Parkinson's disease: toward a potential search for biomarkers for this disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:369. pmid:25426023; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4227512.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lucio M, Fekete A, Frommberger M, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Metabolomics: High-Resolution Tools Offer to Follow Bacterial Growth on a Molecular Level. Handbook of Molecular Microbial Ecology I: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. p. 683–95.

[ref18] 18. Tziotis D, Hertkorn N, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Kendrick-analogous network visualisation of ion cyclotron resonance Fourier transform mass spectra: improved options for the assignment of elemental compositions and the classification of organic molecular complexity. Eur J Mass Spectrom. 2011;17(4):415–21. Epub 2011/10/19. pmid:22006638.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Suhre K, Schmitt-Kopplin P. MassTRIX: mass translator into pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(suppl_2):W481–W4. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Wagele B, Witting M, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Suhre K. MassTRIX reloaded: combined analysis and visualization of transcriptome and metabolome data. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39860. pmid:22815716; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3391204.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Liu Y, Smirnov K, Lucio M, Gougeon RD, Alexandre H, Schmitt-Kopplin P. MetICA: independent component analysis for high-resolution mass-spectrometry based non-targeted metabolomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17(1):114. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA, Pal C. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Fourth Edition. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. xxxii, 621 pages p.

[ref23] 23. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao K-A. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLOS Computational Biology. 2017;13(11):e1005752. pmid:29099853
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Moritz F, Kaling M, Schnitzler JP, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Characterization of poplar metabotypes via mass difference enrichment analysis. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(7):1057–73. Epub 2016/12/13. pmid:27943315.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Kaling M, Schmidt A, Moritz F, Rosenkranz M, Witting M, Kasper K, et al. Mycorrhiza-Triggered Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Networks Impinge on Herbivore Fitness. Plant Physiology. 2018;176(4):2639–56. pmid:29439210
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Lê Cao K-A, Boitard S, Besse P. Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problems. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:253-. PubMed PMID: PMC3133555. pmid:21693065
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Wishart DS, Lewis MJ, Morrissey JA, Flegel MD, Jeroncic K, Xiong Y, et al. The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome. Journal of Chromatography B. 2008;871(2):164–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.05.001.
View Article
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Ayala A, Munoz MF, Arguelles S. Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:360438. pmid:24999379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4066722.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Rapoport SI. Arachidonic Acid and the Brain. J Nutr. 2008;138(12):2515–20. pmid:19022981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3415870.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Lee HJ, Bazinet RP, Rapoport SI, Bhattacharjee AK. Brain arachidonic acid cascade enzymes are upregulated in a rat model of unilateral Parkinson disease. Neurochem Res. 2010;35(4):613–9. pmid:19997776; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2836388.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Yoshii F, Barker WW, Chang JY, Loewenstein D, Apicella A, Smith D, et al. Sensitivity of Cerebral Glucose Metabolism to Age, Gender, Brain Volume, Brain Atrophy, and Cerebrovascular Risk Factors. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 1988;8(5):654–61. pmid:3417794.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Molnar D, Schutz Y. The effect of obesity, age, puberty and gender on resting metabolic rate in children and adolescents. European journal of pediatrics. 1997;156(5):376–81. Epub 1997/05/01. pmid:9177980.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Lazzer S, Bedogni G, Lafortuna CL, Marazzi N, Busti C, Galli R, et al. Relationship Between Basal Metabolic Rate, Gender, Age, and Body Composition in 8,780 White Obese Subjects. Obesity. 2010;18(1):71–8. pmid:19478787
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Lohner S, Fekete K, Marosvolgyi T, Decsi T. Gender differences in the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status: systematic review of 51 publications. Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2013;62(2):98–112. Epub 2013/01/19. pmid:23327902.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Cassol E, Misra V, Dutta A, Morgello S, Gabuzda D. Cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics reveals altered waste clearance and accelerated aging in HIV patients with neurocognitive impairment. AIDS. 2014;28(11):1579–91. pmid:24752083; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4086755.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Aoyama K, Nakaki T. Impaired glutathione synthesis in neurodegeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(10):21021–44. pmid:24145751; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3821656.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Maher P. The effects of stress and aging on glutathione metabolism. Ageing Res Rev. 2005;4(2):288–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2005.02.005. pmid:15936251
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, Daniel S, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Glutathione-related enzymes in brain in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(3):356–61. pmid:8080243.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, Daniel S, Agid Y, Javoy-Agid F, et al. Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(3):348–55. pmid:8080242.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Pearce RKB, Owen A, Daniel S, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Alterations in the distribution of glutathione in the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. Journal of neural transmission. 1997;104(6):661–77. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. LeWitt PA, Li J, Lu M, Beach TG, Adler CH, Guo L, et al. 3-hydroxykynurenine and other Parkinson's disease biomarkers discovered by metabolomic analysis. Mov Disord. 2013;28(12):1653–60. pmid:23873789.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Rae CD. A Guide to the Metabolic Pathways and Function of Metabolites Observed in Human Brain 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectra. Neurochem Res. 2014;39(1):1–36. pmid:24258018
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Trupp M, Jonsson P, Ohrfelt A, Zetterberg H, Obudulu O, Malm L, et al. Metabolite and peptide levels in plasma and CSF differentiating healthy controls from patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(3):549–60. pmid:24927756.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Wu G, Fang Y-Z, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND. Glutathione Metabolism and Its Implications for Health. J Nutr. 2004;134(3):489–92. pmid:14988435
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Trezzi JP, Galozzi S, Jaeger C, Barkovits K, Brockmann K, Maetzler W, et al. Distinct metabolomic signature in cerebrospinal fluid in early parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2017;32(10):1401–8. pmid:28843022.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Izumi Y, Zorumski CF. Glial–neuronal interactions underlying fructose utilization in rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience. 2009;161(3):847–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.008. pmid:19362122
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] PubMed/NCBI

[171] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Mazzio E, Soliman KFA. The Role of Glycolysis and Gluconeogenesis in the Cytoprotection of Neuroblastoma Cells against 1-Methyl 4-Phenylpyridinium Ion Toxicity. NeuroToxicology. 2003;24(1):137–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-813X(02)00110-9. pmid:12564389
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[173] View Article

[174] PubMed/NCBI

[175] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Michell AW, Mosedale D, Grainger DJ, Barker RA. Metabolomic analysis of urine and serum in Parkinson’s disease. Metabolomics. 2008;4(3):191. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Lei S, Zavala-Flores L, Garcia-Garcia A, Nandakumar R, Huang Y, Madayiputhiya N, et al. Alterations in Energy/Redox Metabolism Induced by Mitochondrial and Environmental Toxins: A Specific Role for Glucose-6-Phosphate-Dehydrogenase and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway in Paraquat Toxicity. ACS Chemical Biology. 2014;9(9):2032–48. pmid:24937102
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Liu X, Yamada N, Maruyama W, Osawa T. Formation of dopamine adducts derived from brain polyunsaturated fatty acids: mechanism for Parkinson disease. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(50):34887–95. pmid:18922792; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3259879.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Bazinet RP, Laye S. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites in brain function and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(12):771–85. pmid:25387473.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Umeda-Sawada R, Fujiwara Y, Ushiyama I, Sagawa S, Morimitsu Y, Kawashima H, et al. Distribution and metabolism of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA, 20:3n-6) by oral supplementation in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70(9):2121–30. pmid:16960355.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Bosetti F. Arachidonic Acid Metabolism in Brain Physiology and Pathology: Lessons from Genetically Altered Mouse Models. J Neurochem. 2007;102(3):577–86. PubMed PMID: PMC2084377. pmid:17403135
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Julien C, Berthiaume L, Hadj-Tahar A, Rajput AH, Bedard PJ, Di Paolo T, et al. Postmortem brain fatty acid profile of levodopa-treated Parkinson disease patients and parkinsonian monkeys. Neurochem Int. 2006;48(5):404–14. pmid:16442670.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. de Farias CC, Maes M, Bonifácio KL, Bortolasci CC, de Souza Nogueira A, Brinholi FF, et al. Highly specific changes in antioxidant levels and lipid peroxidation in Parkinson’s disease and its progression: Disease and staging biomarkers and new drug targets. Neurosci Lett. 2016;617(Supplement C):66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.011.
View Article
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Sunday O, Adekunle M, Temitope O, Richard A, Samuel A, Olufunminyi A, et al. Alteration in antioxidants level and lipid peroxidation of patients with neurodegenerative diseases {Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson disease}. Int J Nutr Pharm Neurol Dis. 2014;4(3):146–52. .
View Article
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Sanyal J, Bandyopadhyay SK, Banerjee TK, Mukherjee SC, Chakraborty DP, Ray BC, et al. Plasma levels of lipid peroxides in patients with Parkinson's disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2009;13(2):129–32. Epub 2009/06/09. pmid:19499848.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] PubMed/NCBI

[212] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Anandhan A, Jacome MS, Lei S, Hernandez-Franco P, Pappa A, Panayiotidis MI, et al. Metabolic Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease: Bioenergetics, Redox Homeostasis and Central Carbon Metabolism. Brain Res Bull. 2017;133:12–30. pmid:28341600; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5555796.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[214] View Article

[215] PubMed/NCBI

[216] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Schapira AHV, Cooper JM, Dexter D, Clark JB, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Mitochondrial Complex I Deficiency in Parkinson's Disease. J Neurochem. 1990;54(3):823–7. pmid:2154550
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[218] View Article

[219] PubMed/NCBI

[220] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Pieczenik SR, Neustadt J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and molecular pathways of disease. Exp Mol Pathol. 2007;83(1):84–92. PubMed PMID: WOS:000247716800013. pmid:17239370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] PubMed/NCBI

[224] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Moon HE, Paek SH. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease. Exp Neurobiol. 2015;24(2):103–16. PubMed PMID: PMC4479806. pmid:26113789
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] PubMed/NCBI

[228] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Ahmed SS, Santosh W, Kumar S, Christlet HT. Metabolic profiling of Parkinson's disease: evidence of biomarker from gene expression analysis and rapid neural network detection. Journal of biomedical science. 2009;16:63. Epub 2009/07/15. pmid:19594911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2720938.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[230] View Article

[231] PubMed/NCBI

[232] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Ames BN, Atamna H, Killilea DW. Mineral and vitamin deficiencies can accelerate the mitochondrial decay of aging. Mol Aspects Med. 2005;26(4–5):363–78. Epub 2005/08/17. pmid:16102804.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[234] View Article

[235] PubMed/NCBI

[236] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Michalke B, Berthele A, Mistriotis P, Ochsenkühn-Petropoulou M, Halbach S. Manganese speciation in human cerebrospinal fluid using CZE coupled to inductively coupled plasma MS. Electrophoresis. 2007;28(9):1380–6. pmid:17377947
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] PubMed/NCBI

[240] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Willkommen D, Lucio M, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Gazzaz M, Schroeter M, Sigaroudi A, et al. Species fractionation in a case-control study concerning Parkinson’s disease: Cu-amino acids discriminate CSF of PD from controls. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.01.005.
View Article
Google Scholar

[242] View Article

[243] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Study participants

Sample preparation

FT-ICR-MS measurement

Data pre-treatment and statistics

Results

Discussion

Glutathione metabolism

Energy metabolism

Fatty acids and lipid metabolism

Mitochondrial dysfunction

Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Raw data of non-targeted metabolomic investigation in CSF.

S2 Table. Important masses detected with the ReliefF features selection algorithm.

S3 Table. Most important neutral masses to distinguish between Parkinson´s disease and controls with all possible assignments to respective masses.

S4 Table. Summary of network analysis.

S5 Table. Balanced Error Rate (BER).

Acknowledgments

References