http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9956-2385
Figures
Abstract
Background
A group of Russian scientists has developed Diaskintest, which comprises Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific recombinant proteins CFP10-ESAT6, for skin testing (0.2 μg/0.1 ml).
Study purpose
To evaluate the comparative sensitivity of TST with 2 TU PPD-L and a skin test with tuberculous recombinant allergen (Diaskintest) containing the ESAT6-CFP10 protein in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed active tuberculosis during mass screening in the primary medical service in Moscow.
Materials and methods
The trial was a comprehensive retrospective group study of children and adolescents diagnosed in Moscow with active tuberculosis in 2013–2016, aged 0 to 17 years inclusive.
Results
From 441 patients selected for analysis 408 patients had both tests (TST with 2 TU PPD-L and Diaskintest) performed, in 193 patients both tests were given simultaneously, of them 162 patients were BCG-vaccinated. Comparative results of both tests in 408 patients with tuberculosis: at cut-off ≥ 5 mm, both tests has similar sensitivity: Diaskintest 98.3% (95% CI 97.0–99.6%), TST 98.0% (95% CI 96.7–99.4%), at cut-off ≥10 mm, the sensitivity decreases for both tests: Diaskintest 90.0% (95% CI 87.0–93.0%), TST 88.7% (95% CI 85.6–91.9%), but at cut-off ≥ 15 mm, the decrease in sensitivity is statistically significant: for Diaskintest 61.5% (95% CI 56.7–66.3%), and for TST 46.3% (95% CI 41.4–51.3%), p <0.0001.
The results of simultaneous setting of tests on different hands in 193 people (including 162 BCG-vaccinated), do not differ from the results for 408 people.
The correlation between the results of Diaskintest and TST was significant in all groups.
Conclusion
In children and adolescents with active tuberculosis, Diaskintest of 0.2 μg/ml and the Mantoux test with 2 TU PPD-L have high sensitivity (98%) at a cut-off of 5 mm; however, at cut-off ≥ 15 mm sensitivity is significantly reduced, and the decrease is more pronounced in the Mantoux test. The advantage of Diaskintest is that, unlike the Mantoux test, it has high specificity under the conditions of mass BCG vaccination. The test is simple to carry out, and can be used in mass screening.
Citation: Slogotskaya L, Bogorodskaya E, Ivanova D, Sevostyanova T (2018) Comparative sensitivity of the test with tuberculosis recombinant allergen, containing ESAT6-CFP10 protein, and Mantoux test with 2 TU PPD-L in newly diagnosed tuberculosis children and adolescents in Moscow. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0208705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208705
Editor: Pere-Joan Cardona, Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, SPAIN
Received: March 29, 2018; Accepted: November 21, 2018; Published: December 21, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Slogotskaya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is one of the strategies recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to combat tuberculosis (TB) worldwide and is part of the WHO strategy for tuberculosis control [1–4]. Due to the low specificity of the Mantoux test, the high frequency of false positives due to cross-sensitization with the BCG vaccine strain (Mycobacterium bovis BCG)–difficulties arise in interpreting it. [5–6].
An important stage in improving the methods of diagnosis of tuberculosis was the possibility of studying and deciphering the genome of tuberculosis mycobacteria, which allowed to identify the differences between M. bovis BCG vaccine strain and Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulent strains. In particular, in M. tuberculosis genome, a region of difference (RDI) was discovered, which contains genes that code for the secretion of CFP10 and ESAT6 proteins [7–9]. The discovery of antigens specific for M. tuberculosis led to the development of in vitro tests based on the production of gamma-interferon (IFN-γ) in response to stimulation with these antigens (IGRA-Interferon-Gamma Release Assays) [10–11]. The tests showed almost 100% specificity, but a lower sensitivity–about 70–75% [12–15].
The results of IGRA tests in the children's population are mixed, because the confirmation or exclusion of disease of tuberculosis in children is a difficult task [16–20].
The Russia vaccination policy for TB is all children are to be vaccinated with BCG after birth and revaccinated at the age of 7 provided that they have a negative Mantoux test with 2 TU PPD-L.
IGRA tests, having high specificity, still have a number of serious disadvantages: high material costs, the need for an equipped laboratory, intravenous manipulation and the precautionary requirements for maintaining the viability of lymphocytes producing INF-γ, which does not allow this method to be used for mass diagnostics.
The solution of the problem for Russia was the introduction of a skin test with CFP10 and ESAT6 proteins. In Russia, the medicinal product Diaskintest (manufactured by Generium according to the GMP standard) was developed, which is a complex of CFP10/ESAT6 recombinant proteins, produced by Escherichia coli, BL21 (DE3) / pCFP-ESAT, intended for setting an intradermal test [21]. The test has been widely used in Russia since 2009 according to the order of the Ministry of Health of Russia.
Study purpose: study of the comparative sensitivity of Mantoux test with 2 TU PPD-L and a skin test with tuberculous recombinant allergen (Diaskintest) containing the ESAT6–CFP10 protein in newly diagnosed tuberculosis in children and adolescents registered in 2013–2016 in Moscow in a mass application of tests in the primary medical service.
Materials and methods
Study designs
The design of the study–a full-design retrospective group study of children and adolescents diagnosed in Moscow with active tuberculosis in 2013–2016. Inclusion criteria included age at enrolment under of 17 years and the inclusion of active TB disease. There was no formal sample size. The study was conducted as a full-design study in routine practice. The full study schedule is shown in Fig 1.
TST—tuberculin skin test.
Every year in Moscow all children and adolescents are screened with the tuberculin skin test with 2TU PPD-L (Saint Petersburg RDE of Vaccines and Serums FMBA of Russia) Children and adolescents with a positive TST (cut-off ≥ 5 mm) should be examined by Diaskintest (CJSC GENERIUM, Russia). Sometimes, at the request of parents, children are given two tests simultaneously on different hands.
Persons with a positive reaction to Diaskintest are subject to a thorough examination to identify active tuberculosis (pulmonary and extrapulmonary). This is a computed tomography of chest organs, ultrasound of other organs, and in the presence of changes in the lungs–a sputum examination on MBT culture and molecular genetic methods. In the presence of local changes in the chest, including the intrathoracic lymph nodes and the pleura, children are subject to a commission assessment of changes in order to establish a diagnosis of tuberculosis or the presence of post-tuberculosis changes. The commission consists of the most qualified phthisiatricians and radiologists. If a diagnosis of tuberculosis is established, the children are hospitalized in a 24–hour in-patient facility and given anti-tuberculosis therapy, depending on the severity of the process, the availability of drug resistance, but at least 6 months. All anti-tuberculosis activities are free, regardless of whether they are permanent Moscow residents or migrants. Children with positive reactions without local changes are subject to preventive therapy for at least 3 months on an outpatient basis or in a sanatorium and are observed during the year.
Tuberculin skin testing (TST)
TST was performed by the Mantoux method. Two tuberculin units allergen tuberculosis purified (PPD-L, Saint Petersburg RDE of Vaccines and Serums FMBA of Russia) was applied intradermally and transverse induration measured 72 hours later. Positivity was defined as an induration of $5mm and most (cut-off ≥ 5 mm) in accordance with Russian guidelines (stratified threshold).
Tuberculosis recombinant allergen (Diaskintest)
Tuberculosis recombinant allergen (Diaskintest) (CJSC GENERIUM, Russia) was applied intradermally in a dose of 0.2 μg/0.1 ml according to the Mantoux test technique and transverse induration measured 72 hours later. When evaluating the response to the introduction of the tuberculosis recombinant allergen, the test was regarded as negative in the absence of infiltration or hyperemia, doubtful in the presence of only hyperemia of any size, positive in the presence of an infiltrate of any size.
Main approaches to the statistical analyses
Descriptive statistics.
The results contains the descriptive statistics of the subjects included to this study. For quantitative variables (age, the numeric results of the diagnostic tests, etc.) the following statistics presented: number of valid values (N); minimum (Min); maximum (Max); arithmetic mean (M); standard deviation (SD); 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean; median (Me); interquartile range (IQR). Categorical data (such as gender, a group of the subject, etc.) presented with frequency in a format n/N and percentage (%).
Analyses of the test results.
Data on sensitivity of the immunological tests presented as frequencies in a format n/N, where n is the number of subjects with true positive test results and N is number of subjects included to the analysis, as well as respective percentage (%).
McNemar test was applied to compare the results on sensitivity and concordance/disconcordance of the two tests and to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for a true positive result under different cut-off levels applied. To reveal chance-corrected agreement between the two tests, the kappa coefficients were calculated. The data presented with all the count a-b-c-d for two-by-two tables under different combinations of the test results.
Quantitative results of the two tests (size of indurations in mm) were analyzed with Pearson correlation and paired t-test. The point estimate for the mean differences in induration sizes along with 95% CI are shown.
Ethical approvals.
The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Scientific and Clinical Antituberculosis Center of Moscow Government Health Department, Moscow (number 3, 17.11.2016) conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, 1964 and subsequent amendments.
All parents give written informed consent for carrying out skin tests and any manner of examination and treatment. The patients' parents gave their consent to the processing of the study data provided that no personal information is published. Access to medical documents for the conduct of this study was granted on November 17, 2016.
Software.
All the statistical analyses were performed using Stata ver. 14 (StataCorp LP, www.stata.com. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station T:SL, 2).
Results and discussion
Results
Analyses of baseline characteristics of the subjects.
The following age category of subjects was included in the study: children and adolescents aged 0 to 17 years inclusive–total 441. Out of 441 patients, the results of the Diaskintest are known in 421 people, TST- in 414 people (the reasons of no TST results were: parents refusal to perform TST having only Diaskintest done; no data for patients who are not residents, although they were in the territory of Moscow, entered the official statistics of morbidity, received treatment in federal healthcare institutions and left for home, without submitting documents to the Moscow TB Service). The mean age of the patients is 8.8 ± 5.8 years. Data on the average age of subjects in each of these subgroups are summarized below (Table 1). 234 patients (55.6%) were female and 187 (44.4%) were male (S1 Table).
Out of 421 patients, 408 patients had the results of both tests, 193 patients were simultaneously given 2 tests: TST with 2 TU PPD-L and Diaskintest, 162 of whom were BCG-vaccinated, 10 were not vaccinated, no data were reported for 21, due they were migrants.
The diagnosis of tuberculosis is confirmed by the discovery of the pathogen in a small number of cases (13/421–3.1%). The main diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical and radiological data (S3 Table).
Analyses of the sensitivity of the two tests.
Of 421 patients having results of Diaskintest, the negative reaction was found within 8/421 (1.9%) subjects, while 9/421 (2.1%) had induration size of less than 5 mm. Thus, the sensitivity of Diaskintest at cut-off > 0 mm was 98.1% (95% CI 96.2%-99.2%), at cut-off ≥ 5 mm 97.9% (95% CI 96.0%-99.0%, at cut-off ≥ 10 mm– 89.8% (95% CI 86.5%-92.5%, and at cut-off ≥ 15 mm 61,1% (95% CI 56.2%-65.7%) (Table 2).
TST results were available for 414 patients (the parents of the rest have refused to perform TST having done only the Diaskintest). Absence of induration has been revealed for 5/414 (1.2%) subjects, while 8/414 (1.9%) had induration of less than 5 mm. Thus, the sensitivity of TST was 98.8% (95% CI 97.2%-99.6%), 98.1% (95% CI 96.2%-99.2%), 88.9% (95% CI 85.5%-91.7%), and 46.1% (95% CI 41.3%-51.1%), respectively (Table 2). Sensitivity at cut-off ≥ 15 mm was statistically significant lower compared to that of Diaskintest (р<0.0001).
408 of 421 subjects had the results of both the tests (Table 3). It was found that at cut-off ≥ 5 mm the sensitivity of both the tests was similar: Diaskintest 98.3% (95% CI 97.0–99.6%) and TST 98.0% (95% CI 96.7–99.4%), while at cut-off ≥ 10 mm the sensitivity somewhat decrease to 90.0% (95% CI 87.0–93.0%) for Diaskintest and to 88.7% (95% CI 85.6–91.9%) for TST. However, at cut-off ≥15 mm the drop in sensitivity was both statistically and clinically significant (р< 0.0001): to 61.5% (95% CI 56.7–66.3%) for Diaskintest and even worse for TST–to 46.3% (95% CI 41.4–51.3%) (Fig 2).
Sensitivity of the two diagnostics tests (a point estimation along with 95% CI): A—the patients with the both results present (n = 408), B—patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 193), C—vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 162), D—non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 10).
The simultaneous diagnostics with both the tests was performed for 193 subjects (Table 4, Fig 2).
Among patients with the simultaneous using of the two different skin tests, 162 persons (94.2%) were known to be BCG vaccinated (Table 5, Fig 2). Sensitivity of both the tests was similar to that of the sample collected 193 patients, as almost all of them were vaccinated.
As BCG vaccination is mandatory in the newborn and revaccination–in children at the age of 7 years (with negative Mantoux reactions with 2 TU PPD-L), the number of non-vaccinated patients was only 10 subjects, which explains the extremely wide confidence intervals observed.
The comparison of the results between TST and Diaskintest on the sample of patients with the both diagnostic tests present was performed using McNemar test at different cut-off levels (Table 6). Given the high concordance of the test results, the kappa coefficient, adjusted for the probability of random coincidence of the results was not so high (kappa <0.4), while no statistically significant difference between the two test results was revealed when an equal cut-off level (either ≥ 5 mm or ≥ 10 mm) was applied for both the tests (p > 0.05). It is also interesting to note, that at cut-off ≥ 15 mm Diaskintest was 2.7 times more likely (p < 0.0001) to show a true positive result (OR = 0.37 with 95% CI 0.25–0.55).
Similar results were obtained for the test of patients with simultaneous diagnostic tests performed (Table 7). No statistically significant difference between the two test results was revealed when an equal cut-off level (either ≥ 5 mm or ≥ 10 mm) was applied for both the tests (p > 0.05). It is also interesting to note, that at cut-off ≥ 15 mm Diaskintest was 2.9 times more likely (p = 0.0004) to show a positive results (OR = 0.34 with 95% CI 0.17–0.64). In subjects with simultaneous tests with TST cut-off ≥ 10 mm and Diaskintest cut-off ≥ 0 mm, the chances of obtaining a positive result of Diaskintest were at least 2.17 times higher (OR = 0.11 with 95% CI 0.01–0.46).
The results obtained for the BCG vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (Table 8) were also similar. While no statistically significant difference between the two test results was revealed when an equal cut-off level (either ≥ 5 mm or ≥ 10 mm) was applied for both the tests (p > 0.05). It is also interesting to note, that at cut-off ≥ 15 mm Diaskintest was 2.8 times more likely (p = 0.0009) to show a true positive result (OR = 13/37 = 0.35 with 95% CI 0.17–0.68).
The results for non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous tests were not statistically significant due to a small sample size (n = 10) (S2 Table).
Analyses of the size of indurations
Most of the patients had the size of induration ≥10 mm for both the diagnostic tests. At the same time, the percent of patients having induration ≥15 mm on Diaskintest test was higher compared to TST (Fig 3): 61.5% vs 46.3% (for all the patients with the both results present, n = 408), 60.1% vs 46.1% (for the patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = 193), 61.7% vs 46.9% (for the vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = 162), and 30.0% vs 50.0% (for the non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, n = 10).
Induration size for the two diagnostics tests: A—the patients with the both results present (n = 408), B—patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 193), C—vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 162), D—non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 10).
Generally, the patients in all the samples have shown a higher induration size for Diaskintest compared with TST. The analysis performed with a paired t-test has shown statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) except for the non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed, where only a small sample size was available (Fig 4, S4 Table). The difference was on average 1.9 mm (with 95% CI 1.4–2.4 mm) for all the patients with both the test results present. Similar effect size was found for the patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed: on average 1.4 mm (with 95% CI 0.8–2.1 mm). Despite for the non-vaccinated patients the difference has not reached a level of statistical significance, the point estimate was also 2.0 mm (13.6 ± 7.8 mm for Diaskintest versus 11.6 ± 3.2 mm for TST).
Boxplot for the induration sizes of the two diagnostics tests: A—the patients with the both results present (n = 408), B—patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 193), C—vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 162), D—non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 10).
The Pearson correlation between induration sizes of the two tests was of clinical and statistical significance (above 0.4, p < 0.001) in all the samples with maximum of 0.878 observed for the non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (Fig 5).
Scatter-plot for the induration sizes of the two diagnostics tests: A—the patients with the both results present (n = 408), B—patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 193), C—vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 162), D—non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 10).
The comparative study of the sensitivity of TST and Diaskintest in the same of 408 children with newly diagnosed tuberculosis of respiratory organs in different cut-offs demonstrated the highest sensitivity of TST and Diaskintest for cut-off ≥ 5 mm: Diaskintest 98.3% (95% CI 97.0–99.6%), TST 98.0% (95% CI 96.7–99.4%), with cut-off ≥10 mm, the sensitivity of tests decreases to Diaskintest insignificantly to TST to a greater extent: 90.0% (95% CI 87.0–93.0%), and 88.7% (95% CI 85.6–91.9%), respectively; but with cut-off ≥ 15 mm, the decrease in sensitivity is statistically significant: 61.5% (95% CI 56.7–66.3%) to Diaskintest, and to TST 46.3% (95% CI 41.4–51.3%), p <0.0001.
Discordant results with negative Diaskintest were observed: in 2013, in 2 children aged 2 and 3 months who were born by women with tuberculosis. Children were examined as contacts–both tests were negative. Another child suffered from chronic adrenal insufficiency (TST (+), Diaskintest (-)), he was examined as contact with a tuberculous father and had disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis; another child with disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis and one with focal pulmonary tuberculosis (Mantoux test (+), Diaskintest (-)). In 2014, one teenager with pleurisy (Mantoux test (+), Diaskintest (-)), in 2015, 4 children with HIV infection and disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis (Mantoux test (-), Diaskintest (-)); 2 teenagers with infiltrative pulmonary tuberculosis (Mantoux test (+), Diaskintest (-)), 1 child with hilar tuberculosis in the calcification phase (Mantoux test (+), Diaskintest (-)), in 2016, 1 child, 6 months old, not vaccinated with BCG, with disseminated tuberculosis had a negative reaction (Mantoux test (+), Diaskintest (-)).
Discussion
The comparative study of the sensitivity of TST and Diaskintest in the same of 408 children with newly diagnosed tuberculosis of respiratory organs in different cut-offs demonstrated the highest sensitivity of TST and Diaskintest for cut-off ≥ 5 mm: 98%, with cut-off ≥10 mm, the sensitivity of tests decreases to Diaskintest insignificantly to TST to a greater extent: 90.0% and 88.7% respectively; but with cut-off ≥ 15 mm, the decrease in sensitivity is statistically significant: 61.5% to Diaskintest, and to TST 46.3%, p <0.0001(Table 3, Fig 2).
Given the high concordance of the test results, the kappa coefficient, was not so high (kappa <0.4), while no statistically significant difference between the two test results was revealed when an equal cut-off level (either ≥ 5 mm or ≥ 10 mm) was applied for both the tests (p > 0.05). It is also interesting to note, that at cut-off ≥ 15 mm Diaskintest was 2.7 times more likely (p < 0.0001) to show a true positive result (OR = 0.37 with 95% CI 0.25–0.55). (Table 6).
Similar results were obtained for the test of 193 patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (Tables 4, Fig 2). The results obtained for the BCG vaccinated 162 patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed were also similar (Tables 5, Fig 2).
Most of the patients had the size of induration ≥10 mm for both the diagnostic tests. At the same time, the percent of patients having induration ≥15 mm on Diaskintest test was higher compared to TST (Figs 3 and 4): 61.5% vs 46.3% (for all the patients with the both results present, n = 408).
Recent reviews of WHO strategy END TB specify the priority tasks: development of biomarkers for the detection and diagnosis of tuberculosis in children including systematic screening (active search for TB cases); detection of latent tuberculosis infection–to reduce the pool of individuals with LTBI. A biomarker shall have low cost–for TB diagnostics at the primary healthcare level [22,23]. The review of National policies on the management of latent tuberculosis infection of 98 countries identified that tuberculin skin testing was the most frequently recommended diagnostic tool. The test is comparably cheaper than interferon-gamma release assay. Several countries specified additional diagnostic algorithms, such as different tuberculin skin test cut-off points among specific risk groups, sequential use of the two tests, or use of interferon assay for BCG-vaccinated individuals [24]. The diversity of policies across countries calls for more research in how to use interferon-gamma release assay and tuberculin skin testing together among different risk groups based on the underlying tuberculosis epidemiology [24–26]
The major advantage of skin test with ESAT6 CFP10 in endemic countries would be substantially low cost (will be competitive with TST) [15].
Since there is no diagnostic standard for LTBI, active tuberculosis is used as a comparable substitute, although tuberculosis is known to be immunosuppressive.
In Russia, BCG vaccination of newborns and revaccination at 7 years (with negative TST with 2 TU PPD-L) is mandatory. Mantoux tuberculin test with 2 TU PPD-L was also mandatory so far. It is clear that under such conditions the specificity of the sample is extremely low. The situation is aggravated by the fact that in Russia there is one limit of positive results– 5 mm for all–vaccinated and unvaccinated. At the same time, positive reactions to the Mantoux test in children and adolescents are registered in 75%, and the increase in the reaction is observed annually only in 0.9% of the tuberculin-positive ones. Annually, the rate of primarily infected children among the tuberculin-positive is 0.67%, and 0.06% in adolescents [27]. In such conditions, there was a need for a specific test capable of distinguishing post-vaccination allergy. Such a test was a skin test with a tubercular recombinant allergen (Diaskintest) containing ESAT-6–CFP-10 protein. [21]. Since 2009, at the order of the Ministry of Health of Russia, the Diaskintest has been used for differential diagnosis of postvaccinal and infectious allergies. All children with a positive reaction to Diaskintest should be examined to identify local forms of tuberculosis and, in the absence of such, to receive preventive treatment for LTBI. Detection of tuberculosis among people with positive reactions to Diaskintest is ten times higher than among tuberculin-positive [28].
There is no international agreement on cut-off values for the definition of a positive tuberculin reaction [29–32]. The choice among commonly used cut-off values (e.g. a diameter of induration of ≥ 5mm, ≥ 10mm or ≥ 15mm) depends on an individual’s risk factor profile for TB. Usually, a lower cut-off value of ≥ 5mm is used for individuals at higher risk of TB and a higher cut-off value of ≥ 10mm is applied for individuals at lower risk of TB [30–32].
Similar to the Russian test, the Danish skin test with C-Tb was developed, which is produced by Statens Serum Institut (Copenhagen, Denmark)–the difference is that it is a mixture of two recombinant proteins ESAT-6 and CFP-10 in the ratio of 1:1. Both proteins are produced by Lactococcus lactis, the dose of the drug for intradermal application is 0.1 μg/0.1 ml [14,15,33,34,35].
In phase III clinical studies of C-tb Danish skin test, three tests were compared: QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, tuberculin skin test (TST), and C-tb skin test. The results showed that sensitivity of C-Tb was 69% in TB, which is 14% lower than that of QFT [14].
We compared the sensitivity results obtained with Diaskintest and the results of the skin test with C-tb [14] and let us assume the reasons for the lower sensitivity of the latter: firstly, adults with lower sensitivity compared to children were examined, and secondly, those who completed the treatment a long time ago were enrolled to the group of those surveyed, and they probably had a negative reaction, as was observed in our studies with Diaskintest [36]; the possibility of insufficient sensitivity in the difference in dosage in C-tb 0.1 μg (Diaskintest– 0.2 μg) is not excluded.
The high sensitivity of Diaskintest in children can be explained by the optimal diagnosis of the disease, which is facilitated by the fact that children from 1 year of age are subject to annual tuberculin diagnostics, the moment of primary infection is fixed and they are subject to examination at the phthisiatrician. Our comparative studies of the sensitivity of Diaskintest and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube tests showed high sensitivity of not only Diaskintest, but also QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (more than 90%) [37], which can be explained by the adequate diagnosis of tuberculosis in children, which is a difficult task in the absence of clinical manifestations and bacterial excretion. After the introduction of Diaskintest to wide practice in 2010 and the prescription of preventive therapy to children with a positive reaction, the incidence of tuberculosis in Moscow in 2016 decreased from 10.6 to 5.5. The incidence in adolescents showed a decrease from 28.7 to 11.6, with the incidence of the resident population almost 2 times lower in both children and adolescents [38]. An important role is played by the fact that the detection, diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis and LTBI in children is fully funded, regardless of the social belonging of children, their citizenship and their permanent place of residence. All undergo the vaccination, annual tuberculin diagnostics, Diaskintest (with positive reactions to TST), computed tomography with positive Diaskintest reaction, bacteriological and molecular genetic examination, long-term controlled therapy in a hospital with tuberculosis, and outpatient or in a sanatorium with LTBI (at the request of parents). Data on the high sensitivity of the skin test with the drug containing the specific ESAT6–CFP10 protein, corresponds to the data of S. Sollai [39] that in high-income countries the sensitivity of IGRA tests is higher than in low-income countries.
Diaskintest test is simple to perform, it is currently used in primary health care, it is cheap (the cost is similar to the Mantoux test) and is now implemented by the order of the Ministry of Health into the practice of Russia as a screening method instead of Mantoux test in children over 7 years old.
Conclusion
In children and adolescents with tuberculosis, Diaskintest at a dose of 0.2 μg/ml and the Mantoux test with 2 TU PPD-L have a high sensitivity (98%) with a cut-off of 5 mm; however, at cut-off ≥ 15 mm sensitivity is significantly reduced, and the decrease is more pronounced in the Mantoux test. At cut-off ≥ 15 mm Diaskintest was 2.7 times more likely (p < 0.0001) to show a true positive result (OR = 0.37 with 95% CI 0.25–0.55). The advantage of Diaskintest is that, unlike the Mantoux test, it has high specificity under the conditions of mass BCG vaccination. The test is simple to carry out, and can be used in mass screening.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Gender distribution of the patients, n = 421.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208705.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Comparison of the results between TST and Diaskintest at different cut-off levels on the sample of non-vaccinated patients with simultaneous diagnostics performed (n = 10).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208705.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Distribution of the patients of the type of tuberculosis, n = 421.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208705.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Descriptive statistics of the induration size (mm) of the Diaskintest (n = 421) and TST, n = 414.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208705.s004
(DOCX)
References
- 1.
World Health Organization. The End TB Strategy. Global Strategy and Targets for Tuberculosis Prevention, Care and Control after 2015. Date last updated: November 2015.
- 2.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis infection. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.01. Geneva, WHO, 2014.
- 3. Getahun H, Matteelli A, Abubakar I, Aziz M, Baddeley A, Barreira D, et al. Management of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries. Eur Respir J. 2015;46: 1563–1576. pmid:26405286
- 4. World Health Organization. Latent tuberculosis infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management. Geneva; 2018.
- 5. Orme M. The latent tuberculosis bacillus (I'll let you know if I ever meet one). Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5(7): 589–593. pmid:11469255
- 6. Greveson K. Can ELISpot replace the tuberculin skin test for latent tuberculosis? Br. J. Nurs. 2009;18(20): 1248–1254. pmid:20081663
- 7. Mahairas G, Sabo P, Hickey M, Singh D, Stover C. Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. Bovis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(5): 1274–82. pmid:8631702
- 8. Lein A, von Reyn C, Ravn P, Horsburgh C, Alexander L, Andersen P. Cellular immune responses to ESAT-6 discriminate between patients with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex and those with pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6(4): 606–9. pmid:10391871
- 9. Ewer K, Deeks J, Alvarez L, Bryant G, Waller S, Andersen P, et al.Comparison of T-cell-based assay with tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a school tuberculosis outbreak. Lancet. 2003;361(9364): 1168–73. pmid:12686038
- 10. Andersen P, Doherty T, Pai M, Weldingh K. The prognosis of latent tuberculosis: can disease be predicted? Trends Mol Med. 2007; 13(5): 175–182. pmid:17418641
- 11. Arend S, Thijsen S, Leyten E, Bouwman J, Franken W, Koster B, et al. Comparison of two interferon-gamma assays and tuberculin skin test for tracing tuberculosis contacts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(6): 618–27. pmid:17170386
- 12. Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008;149 (3): 177–184.
- 13. Mack U, Migliori G, Sester M, Rieder H, Ehlers S, Goletti D, et al. LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection or lasting immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis? A TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(5): 956–73. pmid:19407047
- 14. Ruhwald M, Aggerbeck H, Vázquez Gallardo R. Hoff S, Villate J, Borregaard B, et al. Safety and efficacy of the C-Tb skin test to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, compared with an interferon γ release assay and the tuberculin skin test: a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5: 259–68. pmid:28159608
- 15. Aggerbeck H, Ruhwald M, Hoff S, Borregaard B, Hellstrom E, Malahleha M, et al. C-Tb skin test to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children and HIV-infected adults: A phase 3 trial. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9): e0204554. pmid:30248152
- 16. Connell T, Curtis N, Ranganathan S, Buttery J. Performance of a whole blood interferon gamma assay for detecting latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children. Thorax. 2006; 1: 616–620.
- 17. Ferrara G, Losi M, D’Amico R., Roversi P, Piro R, Meacci M, et al. Use in routine clinical practice of two commercial blood tests for diagnosis of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a prospective study Lancet. 2006;367(9519): 1328–34.
- 18. Kampmann B, Whittaker E, Williams A, Walters S, Gordon A, Martinez-Alier N, et al. Interferon- γ release assays do not identify more children with active tuberculosis than the tuberculin skin test. Eur Respir J. 2009;14: 1374–382.
- 19. Dosanjh D, Hinks T, Innes J, Deeks J, Pasvol G, Hackforth S, et al. Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 4;148(5): 325–36. pmid:18316751
- 20. Goletti D, Stefania C, Butera O, Amicosante M, Ernst M, Sauzullo I, et al. Accuracy of immunodiagnostic tests for active tuberculosis using single and combined results: a multicenter TBNET-Study. PLoS One. 2008;3(10): e3417. pmid:18923709
- 21. Kiselev V, Baranovskii P, Rudykh I, Shuster A., Martyanov V, Mednikov B. et al. The Clinical trials of the new skin test Diaskintest for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Problemy tuberkuleza i boleznei legkikh. 2009;2: 11–16.
- 22. Pai M. Innovations in Tuberculosis Diagnostics: Progress and Translational Challenges. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(3): 182–183. pmid:26137556
- 23.
Consensus meeting report: development of a Target Product Profile (TPP) and a framework for evaluation for a test for predicting progression from tuberculosis infection to active disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (WHO/HTM/TB/2017.18). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA3.0 IGO.
- 24. Jagger A, Reiter-karam S, Hamada Y, and Getahun H. National policies on the management of latent tuberculosis infection: review of 98 countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(3): 173–184. pmid:29531416
- 25. Mastrolia M, Sollai S, Totaro C, Putignano P, de Martino M, Galli L, et.al. Utility of tuberculin skin test and IGRA for tuberculosis screening in internationally adopted children: Retrospective analysis from a single center in Florence, Italy. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease; 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.07.009.
- 26. Napoli C, Ferretti F, Di Ninno F, Orioli R, Marani A, Sarlo M, et al. Screening for Tuberculosis in Health Care Workers: Experience in an Italian Teaching Hospital. BioMed Research International Volume; 2017, Article ID 7538037, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7538037.
- 27. Slogotskaya L, Bogorodskaya E, Senchikhina O, Nikitina G. Formation of risk groups for tuberculosis disease in various immunological methods of the examination of children population. Rossiyskiy Pediatricheskiy Zhurnal (RussianPediatric Journal). 2017;20(4): 206–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/1560-9561-2017-20-4-206-213.
- 28. Slogotskaya L, Senchikhina O, Nikitina G, Bogorodskaya E. Efficacy of a skin test with an allergen tuberculosis recombinant in the detection of tuberculosis in children and adolescents of Moscow in 2013. Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya. 2015;12 (1): 99–103.
- 29. Al-Orainey IO. Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis: can we do better? Ann Thorac Med. 2009;4: 5–9. pmid:19561914
- 30. Hauck F, Neese B, Panchal A, El-Amin W. Identification and management of latent tuberculosis infection. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79: 879–86. pmid:19496388
- 31.
National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, Centre for Clinical Practice at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Tuberculosis: Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis, and Measures for its Prevention and Control. CG33. London: NICE; 2006. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG033.
- 32.
National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, Centre for Clinical Practice at the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Tuberculosis: Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculosis, and Measures for its Prevention and Control. CG117. London: NICE; 2011.
- 33. Bergstedt W, Tingskov P, Thierry-Carstensen B, Hoff S, Aggerbeck H, Thomsen V, et al.First-in-man open clinical trial of a combined rdESAT-6 and rCFP-10 tuberculosis specific skin test reagent. PLoS One. 2010;5: e11277. pmid:20593018
- 34. Aggerbeck H, Giemza R, Joshi P, Tingskov P., Hoff S, Boyle J, et al. Randomised clinical trial investigating the specificity of a novel skin test (C-Tb) for diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection. PLoS One. 2013;8: e64215. pmid:23691171
- 35. Hoff S, Peter J, Theron G, Pascoe M, Tingskov P, Aggerbeck H, et al. Sensitivity of C-Tb: a novel RD-1-specific skin test for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(3): 919–28. pmid:26677940
- 36. Slogotskaya L, Kochetkov Ya, Senchikhina O, Sel’tsovskiy P, Litvinov V. Dynamics of skin test (diaskin-test) in children when assessing the activity of tuberculosis infection. Tuberkulez i bolezni legkikh. 2011;2: 59–63.
- 37. Slogotskaya L, Ivanova D, Kochetkov Ya, Kulikovskaya N, Vaneeva T, Filippov A. Results of the skin test containing recombinant CFP-10—ESAT-6 protein versus the laboratory test QuantiFERON–GIT. Tuberkulez i bolezni legkikh. 2012;89(10): 27–32.
- 38. Bogorodskaya E, Sevostyanova T, Shamuratova L, Slogotskaya L. Tuberculosis in children and adolescents. In: Anti-TB work in the city of Moscow. Analytical review of statistical indicators for tuberculosis in 2016–2017. pp. 104–128.
- 39. Sollai S, Galli L, de Martino M, Chiappini E. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the utility of Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: a 2013 update. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(1): 6.