Foot typology, body weight distribution, and postural stability of adolescent elite soccer players: A 3-year longitudinal study

Jitka Marencakova; Tomas Maly; Dai Sugimoto; Tomas Gryc; Frantisek Zahalka

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204578

Abstract

Objective

The unique foot morphology and distinctive functions facilitate complex tasks and strategies such as standing, walking, and running. In those weight-bearing activities, postural stability (PS) plays an important role. Correlations among foot type, PS, and other musculoskeletal problems that increase sport injury risk are known. However, long-term associations among the foot type, the PS, and body weight (BW) distribution are lacking. Thus, the purpose of this study was to longitudinally identify changes in foot morphology, PS, and symmetry in BW distribution during adolescence among elite male soccer players.

Methods

Thirty-five Czech elite male soccer players (age, 15.49 ± 0.61 years; BW, 64.11 ± 6.16 kg; body height, 174.62 ± 5.71 cm) underwent foot type, PS, and BW distribution measurements during 3 consecutive years (T1, T2, T3). The Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI), BW distribution, and centre of pressure (COP) displacement (total traveled way [TTW]) of each player for the preferred (PL) and non-preferred leg (NL) were acquired. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA), Bonferroni´s post hoc tests, and partial eta-squared (η_p²) coefficient were used for investigating the effect of time on selected variables and effect size evaluation.

Results

Statistically significant effect of time on CSI values (PL: F_2,68 = 5.08, p < 0.01, η_p² = 0.13 and NL: F_2,68 = 10.87, p < 0.01, η_p² = 0.24) and COP displacement values (PL: F_2,68 = 5.07, p <0.01, η_p² = 0.13; NL: F_2,68 = 3.53, p <0.05, η_p² = 0.09) for both legs over 3-years period was identified. Furthermore, the Bonferroni´s post hoc analysis revealed a significant improvement of PS values in the PL (TTW_T1 = 1617.11 ± 520.22 mm vs. TTW_T2 = 1405.29 ± 462.76, p < 0.05; and between TTW_T1 = 1617.11 ± 520.22 mm vs. TTW_T3 = 1370.46 ± 373.94, p < 0.05). Only BW distribution parameter showed no significant differences, although slightly improved over time.

Conclusions

We observed changes in foot typology, PS, and BW distribution in young elite male soccer players during 3 consecutive years. Results demonstrated that changes in PS and body weight distribution under the high-load sport conditions during adolescence may improve with aging, except for foot morphology. Therefore, foot morphology should be carefully monitored to minimize sport injury risk in professional young soccer players during adolescence. Further research is necessary to determine more clear associations between these parameters, soccer-related injuries, and sport performances.

Citation: Marencakova J, Maly T, Sugimoto D, Gryc T, Zahalka F (2018) Foot typology, body weight distribution, and postural stability of adolescent elite soccer players: A 3-year longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0204578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578

Editor: Yih-Kuen Jan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, UNITED STATES

Received: February 14, 2018; Accepted: September 11, 2018; Published: September 28, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Marencakova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by GACR 16-21791 S and UNCE/HUM/032: 1) GACR 16-21791 S was supported by Czech Science Foundation (Applicant Tomas Maly, Ph.D.); 2) UNCE/HUM/032 was supported by Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Applicant Prof. Frantisek Zahalka, Ph.D.).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The foot is a unique anatomic, neurophysiologic, and functional structure, which facilitate complex tasks and strategies such as standing, walking, and running in human movements [1]. The foot also plays a vital role for maintaining the postural stability (PS) during these movements [2]. Controlling PS requires enough flexibility to absorb shock and adapt to an uneven terrain and, at a different movement phase, conversely sufficient rigidity to create an impulse to move forward [3]. Thus, a certain structural and functional alignment simply described as a foot type (FT) influences foot and lower limb functions, and kinematic gait parameters [4–8], and leads to PS difficulties and musculoskeletal disorders [9]. Current evidence shows that flexible flatfoot type and its poor function are risk factors of sport injuries [10–12].

Soccer players are exposed to high risks of musculoskeletal injuries. In professional soccer, the incidence of injury is 8 cases per 1000 hours [13]. Previous studies reported that the most frequent injury in soccer is caused by contact with an opponent [14], whereas current research showed an increase for non-contact mechanisms of injuries, such as ball taking, jumping, running, change of direction speed, shooting and landing [15]. These tasks require having a good PS control. Lower balance ability has been reported to be significantly associated with an increased risk for ankle injuries in male adult soccer players [16]. Furthermore, another study indicated a direct correlation between flatfoot type and postural control. This study identified that the worse the flatfoot arch is, the worse the postural control is [17] in a meaning of a poor foot alignment. Some studies mentioned that asymmetry of body weight (BW) distribution between the feet leads to overuse of one leg [18]; and according to a review study that focused on soccer injuries reported, up to 24% of all soccer injuries are classified under overuse type [19]. Soccer players usually use one leg frequently for kicking, passing, shooting, and leading the ball. Long-term participation in these single leg activities may lead to overload of one side of the body (legs); thus, muscle imbalances or asymmetries may appear unless they are adequately compensated [20]. Bilateral comparison of the muscle strength in the lower limbs (bilateral ratio; preferred vs. non-preferred leg) or comparison between agonist and antagonist strengths (ipsilateral ratio; e.g., knee flexor vs. knee extensor) may indicate potential weaknesses of the muscle system that are predisposed to muscle injury and can negatively influence sport performance [21–24]. In addition to the asymmetry, growth/maturation factors may play an important role. For example, several investigations reported that adolescents have either the same or more frequent injury occurrence than adult football players [25]. This may potentially stem from growth spurt factor during adolescence. Additionally, a repetitive long-term high load acting during this critical part of aging may have an influence on the performance. Moreover, this may further negatively impact one’s health status in their adulthood. Recently, a few studies were conducted using a longitudinal study design in youth soccer players, especially the injury incidence [26], a relationship of peak high velocity and performance [27], and, also psychological factors in adolescent soccer players [28]. However, no study had investigated the long-term progression of such specific factors as foot morphology, BW distribution, and PS in young professional soccer players.

Hence, the aim of our longitudinal study was to register longitudinal changes in foot typology, PS, and symmetry in BW distribution among adolescent elite soccer players during aging to adulthood within 3 consecutive years.

Materials and methods

Study design

A prospective, longitudinal study design was used to attain the purpose this study. The research was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sports at Charles University in Prague prior to commencement of this project. Each participant or his legal guardian was fully informed about the study design and signed an informed consent form.

Subjects

Seventy-five elite male soccer players from the national teams of Czech Republic initially agreed to voluntary participate in the study. However, in the first year, we lost 13 players (N = 62). In the second year, we further lost 13 players (N = 49), and during the third year, additional 14 players did not participate in this study (N = 35). Thus, at the end only 35 players completed the 3-year longitudinal study (35 men; age, 15.49 ± 0.61 years; BW, 64.11 ± 6.16 kg; and body height, 174.62 ± 5.71 cm) and each lower limb of participant was investigated separately. The reason of dropout was mostly because of the exclusion criteria including lower limb, pelvic, or spinal injury within 6 months before the study started or at any time during the study period, and any acute musculoskeletal pain. Also, several players changed their soccer team affiliations during the study period or relocated to another geographic region. All data were collected one time per a year for 3 consecutive years. The timing of data collection was always during a pre-season in each year. Thus, each player followed measurements three times in total (T1, T2, T3). Measurements were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and sport and exercise science research [29].

Measurements and procedure

The laboratory protocol for the methodology for postural stability, body weight distribution, and foot typology assessment is described in full at http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.QP8DVRW

Assessment of postural stability and body weight distribution.

This prospective, a longitudinal study of foot morphology, symmetry of BW distribution, and PS characteristics of elite soccer players was performed using the RS Footscan Balance 7.6 second-generation tensometric plate (RSscan International, Belgium). The PS and BW distribution between the lower limbs during quiet standing were tested using the Footscan plate with a dimension of 50 x 40 cm and 4 100 sensors with a precision of 0.1 N.cm⁻², a sampling rate of 10 Hz. The measuring plate was placed 2 m from the wall, where a visible point was placed exactly in the perpendicular vertical axis of the body of each player standing barefoot on the plate and at the level of the height of the eyes.

For analysis of PS, we chose the centre of pressure (COP) displacement parameter expressed as total traveled way (TTW) in millimetres. We used the standard procedure described in previous studies [30]. Firstly, the calm narrow standing (NS) test was performed, and then in two single-leg tests, PS was measured during preferred leg (PL) and non-preferred leg (NL) standing. Players’ PL was identified as their preferred leg when performing soccer tasks, such as kicking, passing, tackling, and dribbling.

The NS test lasted for 30 s, and the one-leg stance tests took 60 s, with a 60-s rest between tests. In a standard protocol, a researcher informed the player when each test started and finished. In the beginning of NS test, the player stood in the middle of the measuring plate, with his feet as close as possible, but not touching each other, and arms alongside the body while he was instructed watching the point directly and being motionless during the testing. Then, the researcher started the 30s data collection. After finishing the test and 60s resting, the one-leg stance test was conducted for each leg. Before the test had started, the researcher instructed the player to watch the point and be motionless during the one-leg test. Then, the player could choose the leg he wanted to start with, and he stood on that leg. After that, he bended the non-stance leg knee up to 90° of flexion with a concurrent neutral position in the hip joint and held arms alongside the body. When the preparation was completed, the 60s one-leg stance test was conducted. After the first test, a 60s rest and a new process of the preparation followed for the second test. The player changed his legs and repeated the equal one-leg stance test with the same instructions but for the second leg.

From the NS test, we found the percentage values of BW distribution between the legs (BWD_Δ) and set the normative value of asymmetry for the 5% difference [31]. The TTW parameter of one-leg standing was detected for each leg. The players followed 3 trials for each standing test with open eyes, and the mean values were calculated.

Assessment of foot typology.

For measurements and calculation of the Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI), which is a validated index for foot typology description [32], we used one-leg standing footprints to evaluate the foot type of each lower limb separately. CSI is a ratio of the minimum width of the midfoot to the maximum width of the forefoot [33], with good intra- and inter-rater reliability [32]. The classification scale of the CSI describes 5 categories of medial longitudinal foot arch as follows: height arch (< 0%); normal arch (N; 0.1–29.9%); intermediate foot arch (I; 30.0–39.9%); and lowered foot arch (L; 40.0–44.9%) and flatfoot (F; > 45.0%) [34]. According to other authors, we can further divide flatfoot type by the degree of its severity as follows: mild (45.1–50.0%), moderate (50.1–60.0%), and severe (6.1–100%) [35].

Statistical analysis

For statistical processing of the data, we used descriptive and inductive statistics. Measurements were expressed using the arithmetic mean, and the measure of variability was expressed using standard deviation. Data normality was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To assess the significance of the independent variables (time of observation) based on the dependent variables a repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM ANOVA) was used. To evaluate sphericity, an assumption of RM ANOVA, the Mauchly test was performed. Multiple comparisons of the means of the monitored variables were performed using the Bonferroni´s post hoc test. Moreover, the effect size coefficient was assessed using partial eta squared (η_p²). The foot type differences over three observed years were analysed by non-parametric χ² (chi square test) and Cramer’s V. For all the analyses, the statistical significance level was set as a p value of 0.05 to reject the null hypotheses. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v21 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Inc., Chicago, IL, 2012).

Results

Physical characteristics and body weight distribution

Thirty-five elite football players completed the study. The basic characteristics of the participants and their BW distribution in 3 consecutive years are shown in Table 1. The mean BW distribution was more concentrated in the NL than PL throughout the 3-year period. According to narrow standing test the mean BW distribution asymmetry ranged from 12.2% to 15.2% and had a slightly, but not significant declining trend on time progression.

Download:

Table 1. Characteristics of participants and body weight distribution in 3 consecutive years (T1, T2, T3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578.t001

Postural stability

The COP displacement values of the group at time T1, T2, and T3 are depicted in Table 2. COP displacement expressed as TTW in millimetres had a significant decreasing tendency over 3 years for both legs (PL: F_2,68 = 5.07, p < 0.01, η_p² = 0.13; NL: F_2,68 = 3.54, p = 0.04, η_p² = 0.09). The Bonferroni post hoc analysis revealed a significantly higher level of PS in favour of the observed time in PL (TTW_T1 = 1617.11 ± 520.22 mm vs. TTW_T2 = 1405.29 ± 462.76, p = 0.02 and TTW_T1 = 1617.11 ± 520.22 mm vs. TTW_T3 = 1370.46 ± 373.94, p < 0.05).

Download:

Table 2. Centre of reassure displacement time dependence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578.t002

Foot typology

Repeated measurement ANOVA revealed a significant effect of the main factor (Time) on the CSI values for both legs (PL: F_2,68 = 5.08, p < 0.01, η_p² = 0.13 and NL: F_2,68 = 10.87, p < 0.01, η_p² = 0.24) (Table 3). The participants presented slightly higher CSI values of the PL (CSI_PL) during the whole period in comparison with the NL (CSI_NL). Significant differences were found between the CSI_PL values in years T2 (38.99 ± 9.10%) and T3 (42.06 ± 8.75%; p < 0.05) and CSI_NL values between years T1 (38.01 ± 7.85%) and T3 (41.91 ± 8.98%; p < 0.01), and between T2 (37.04 ± 9.36%) and T3 (41.91 ± 8.98%; p < 0.01).

Download:

Table 3. Chippaux-Smirak index time dependence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578.t003

Foot types distribution and time progression are shown in Figs 1 and 2. The foot types differences over three observed years were significant (χ = 12.94, p < 0.05, Cramer’s V = 0.04). According to CSI, the most frequent FT at T1 was intermediate foot arch (I_T1 = 43%), followed by the lowered (L_T1 = 29%) and flatfoot (F_T1 = 17%) types. Only 11% of the participants had a normal arch foot type. Intermediate and normal FTs had slightly increasing level of distribution at T2 but showed a prominent decreasing tendency at T3 in the sample representation. On the other hand, the lowered FT initially showed a decreasing trend in the distribution but, at T3, increased back to the same value as at T1. Only the flatfoot type had a purely increasing tendency in the sample representation throughout the whole 3-year period (F_T2 = 20%; F_T3 = 36%).

Download:

Fig 1. Foot type distribution according to CSI in time T1 (n = 70).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578.g001

Download:

Fig 2. Time dependent progression of foot type distribution (n = 70).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578.g002

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to observe progression in foot morphology, BW distribution symmetry, and PS changes during the adolescence period of elite male soccer players. In our research sample, we found that the BW distribution asymmetry in between legs became higher than the previously reported value of 5% [31]. Concretely, it ranged from 12.2% to 15.2%. However, no statistically significant changes were found during the period; only a slightly decreasing tendency with aging was depicted. In previous studies, this topic was mostly connected with neurological diseases such as hemiplegic stroke, in which patients show more severe BW distribution asymmetry, and it was identified as a significant risk factor of falling. One study showed that stroke patients had a mean value of BW distribution asymmetry of approximately 49%, which declined to approximately 38%, with declining incidents of falls, after a special training [36]. Unlike studies that dealt with stroke patients, in a field of sports medicine and exercise science, there has not been a report of BW distribution analysis based on asymmetry, as we know recently; thus, this study is novel. The only one study that is linked with the current result, we found, was a study performed by Junge and Dvorak [19]. According to their review, the BW asymmetry had a considerable impact on overuse injury. The asymmetry observed in this study was probably caused by lateral dominance of the lower limbs, which may stem from unilateral sports such as soccer. In the past, most studies reported the asymmetry of strength [24, 37], but this could be connected and influenced by BW distribution, too. Maly et al. [24] reported that more than 73% of soccer players had significant strength asymmetries between legs in both knee flexors and extensors muscle groups. Strength asymmetry is known to decrease with increasing age at professional sport training [37]. However, in our sample, the exact player´s age at professional sport training was not investigated. This could be the reason why we found only nonsignificant changes in BW distribution.

Despite the maturation of the medial longitudinal foot arch during childhood period (4–10 years) [34], some changes in foot morphology may occur during whole lifetime and depend on the physical activity, BW [33], and health conditions of the individual; furthermore, acquired flatfoot type may also develop anytime during one’s lifetime [38]. This is apparent in our longitudinal observation of the FT of elite male soccer players. We observed significant changes in medial longitudinal foot arch morphology during 3 consecutive years in this group of young soccer players, which was represented by the changing distribution of FTs. This could be caused by a combination of many internal and external factors. Players are exposed to a major sporting performance; in that manner, their soft tissues and ligaments could be overused by the long-term term high level performance with not optimal foot morphology and function. Over the course of this study the flatfoot type showed increasing distribution in the sample. One of the considerable reasons could be a summation of the soccer-specific factors. For example, rigid shoes with restricted place for toes, which do not allow a proper stimulation of the interossei muscles to do quality midfoot rocker and relay the impulse to the knee extensors to absorb gravity and ground reaction forces. In that case, the impulse is neither absorbed nor turned to elastic kinetic energy optimally. This may cause the lowering of energy efficiency during walking and running. And with further increasing load of soft tissues and ligaments, the whole process may even get worse resulting in a poor joint alignment with instability [39]. The flatfoot type was found in 17% of the feet: accounting for 11% of the mild form, 3% of the moderate form, and 3% of the severe form, in the first measurement (T1). In the second measurement (T2), the prevalence of the flatfoot type increased to 20%: accounting for 9% of the mild form, 3% of the moderate form, and 2% of the severe form. Finally, in the last year measurement (T3), the total number of flatfoot type was 36%: representing 15% of the mild form, 9% of the moderate form, and 1% of the severe form. While a decrease in the prevalence of the severe form and increase in the prevalence of the mild form of flatfoot type are obvious in our research sample during the entire period, the whole flat foot type group distribution increased simultaneously. On the one hand, this could be explained by the process of maturation when the severe form of flatfoot type could improve during adolescence. On the other hand, the increasing distribution of mild form of flatfoot and finally of whole flatfoot group in our study supports the previously mentioned evidence that the flatfoot type may occur anytime during a lifetime [38] and summation of long-term and repetitive high loading may play important roles. In this regard, we depicted the significant one-leg stance PS changes between measurements T1 and T2. In the NL, we observed worse TTW values than PL values. The lower limbs TTW difference significantly differed only between the first (T1) and third (T3) year of measurement, with constant decreasing of mean value. This improvement of the PS asymmetry could be explained by the improving of lower limbs strength asymmetry with the total age at a professional sport training [37]. It has also been reported that senior professional male players had significantly better PS performance than junior (21 years old) and youth (16 years old) players [40]. This evidence was also supported by the study that compared PS based on different competition levels. This study showed that nationally ranked soccer players had lower PS parameters than regionally ranked players [41]. Hence, the higher the age at professional sport training and the competition level are, the greater the improvement of PS and strength asymmetry is. Interestingly, an excellent correlation was found between the flatfoot type and the PS in young healthy people [17]. As the degree of the flatfoot type increases (the CSI value, respectively) the degree of the PS decreases (the TTW increases, respectively). However, our results showed opposite tendency expressed by the increasing PS degree (decreasing of TTW, respectively) with the decreasing of flatfoot degree during the 3-years of the observation. This supports our hypothesis about the negative impact of longitudinal high loading sport activity on the foot morphology and function. This is in accordance with study of Haendlmayer and Harris [38], in which soccer was indicated to cause prolonged stress and defective biomechanisms on the foot morphology and function possible leading to acquired adult flatfoot type. Regarding to our results, trainers and sport health care providers should check and consider carefully the foot type in adolescence elite soccer players to minimize a risk of musculoskeletal dysfunctions and injury occurrence.

However, the future research is necessary to identify these factors influencing the sport performance and injury risks in adolescent soccer players more deeply with reflection to lower limbs laterality, age at professional sport training, strength asymmetry, and possible correlations between these parameters.

Limitations

Several limitations need to be stated. This study did not take in account the age at professional sport training of the players and the playing position on the pitch. Additionally, generalizability is another limitation. The study participants consist of elite male soccer players. Thus, the current study results may not be applicable to non-elite and female soccer players.

Conclusions

We observed changes in foot typology, BW distribution, and PS in young elite male soccer players during 3 consecutive years. We found that lower limbs difference in BW distribution tended to improve during the adolescence; however, statistically significant differences were not detected. We found significant changes in foot typology. There was an evidence of constant increasing in flatfoot type distribution during the study period. In addition, the PS parameter, TTW of COP, showed a significant improvement by the decreasing value in both one-leg stance tests and in the TTW difference between the legs. These results indicated that selected PS parameters and BW distribution could improve with aging. However, a caution needs to be made for an interpretation. Foot morphology and function should be carefully monitored to avoid further problems related with overuse injury in professional young soccer players during maturation. Further research is needed to determine more clear association between these parameters, soccer-related injuries, and sport performances.

Supporting information

S1 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204578.s001

(XLSX)

References

1. Tiberio D. Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities. Physical Therapy. 1988; 68: 1840–1849. pmid:3194451
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Wright WG, Ivanenko YP, Gurfinkel VS. Foot anatomy specialization for postural sensation and control. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107: 1513–1521. pmid:22157121
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture. 2007; 26: 68–75. pmid:16945538
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Marencakova J, Svoboda Z, Vareka I, Zahalka F. Functional clinical typology of the foot and kinematic gait parameters. Acta Gymnica. 2016; 46: 74–81.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Desilva JM, Bonne-Annee R, Swanson Z, Gill CM, Sobel M, Uy J, et al. Midtarsal break variation in modern humans: Functional causes, skeletal correlates, and paleontological implications. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2015; 156(4): 543–552. pmid:25594359
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Desilva JM, Gill S V. Brief communication: A midtarsal (midfoot) break in the human foot. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013; 151(3): 495–499. pmid:23686391
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Gill S V., Keimig S, Kelty-Stephen D, Hung YC, DeSilva JM. The relationship between foot arch measurements and walking parameters in children. BMC Pediatr. 2016; 16(1): 2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0554-5
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Gill S V, Lewis CL, DeSilva JM. Arch Height Mediation of Obesity-Related Walking in Adults: Contributors to Physical Activity Limitations. Physiol J [Internet]. 2014; 2014: 1–8. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/physiology/2014/821482/
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Billis E, Katsakiori E, Kapodistrias C, Kapreli E. Assessment of foot posture: Correlation between different clinical techniques. Foot. 2007; 17: 65–72.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Beynnon BD, Murphy DF, Alosa DM. Predictive factors for lateral ankle sprains: a literature review. J Athl Train. 2002; 37: 376–380. pmid:12937558
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 585–593. pmid:10496574
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Queen RM, Mall NA, Nunley JA, Chuckpaiwong B. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 582–586. pmid:19157878
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Ekstrand J, Hagglund M, Walden M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 553–558. pmid:19553225
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 15: 267–270.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Wong P, Hong Y. Soccer injury in the lower extremities. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39: 473–482. pmid:16046325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Tropp H, Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Stabilometry in functional instability of the ankle and its value in predicting injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984; 16: 64–66. pmid:6708781
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Harrison P-L, Littlewood C. Relationship between pes planus foot type and postural stability. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2010; 4: 21–24.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Dvorak J, Junge A. F–MARC/Manuál fotbalové medicíny. Praha: Olympia; 2008.
19. Junge A, Dvorak J. Soccer injuries: a review on incidence and prevention. Sports Med. 2004; 34: 929–938. pmid:15487905
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Maly T, Zahalka F, Mala L, Cech P. The bilateral strength and power asymmetries in untrained boys. Open Med. 2015; 10: 224–232.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Knapik JJ, Bauman CL, Jones BH, Harris JM, Vaughan L. Preseason strength and flexibility imbalances associated with athletic injuries in female collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 76–81. pmid:2008935
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Lin YC, Thompson A, Kung JT, Chieh LW, Chou SW, Lin JC. Functional isokinetic strength ratios in baseball players with injured elbows. J Sport Rehabil. 2010; 19: 21–29. pmid:20231742
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Maly T, Sugimoto D, Izovska J, Zahalka F, Mala L. Effect of muscular strength, asymmetries and fatigue on kicking performance in soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2018; 39: 297–303. pmid:29506307
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Maly T, Zahalka F, Mala L. Unilateral and ipsilateral strength asymmetries in elite youth soccer players with respect to muscle group and limb dominance. Int J Morphol. 2016; 34: 1339–1344.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Inklaar H, Bol E, Schmikli SL, Mosterd W. Injuries in male soccer players: team risk analysis. Int J Sports Med. 1996; 17: 229–234. pmid:8739579
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Le Gall F, Carling C, Reilly T, Vandewalle H, Church J, Rochcongar P. Incidence of injuries in elite French youth soccer players: a 10-season study. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 928–938. pmid:16436535
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Philippaerts RM, Vaeyens R, Janssens M, Van Renterghem B, Matthys D, Craen R, et al. The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24: 221–230. pmid:16368632
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Smith EP, Hill AP, Hall HK. Perfectionism, Burnout and Depressive Symptoms in Youth Soccer Players: A Longitudinal Study. J Clin Sport Psychol. 2018: 1–34.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Harriss D, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med. 2015; 36: 1121–1124. pmid:26671845
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Kapteyn TS, Bles W, Njiokiktjien CJ, Kodde L, Massen CH, Mol JMF. Standardization in platform stabilometry being a part of posturography. Agressologie. 1983; 24: 321–326. pmid:6638321
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Dvorak R, Krainova Z, Janura M, Elfmark M. Standardizace metodiky klinického vyšetření stoje na dvou vahách. Rehab Fyz Lek. 2000; 3: 102–105.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Queen RM, Mall NA, Hardaker WM, Nunley JA. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 456–462. pmid:17475140
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Villarroya MA, Esquivel JM, Tomás C, Moreno LA, Buenafé A, Bueno G. Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168: 559–567. pmid:18751725
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Onodera AN, Sacco ICN, Morioka EH, Souza PS, de Sá MR, Amadio AC. What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot. 2008; 18: 142–149.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Klementa J. Somatometrie nohy. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství; 1987.
36. Cheng PT, Wu SH, Liaw MY, Wong AM, Tang FT. Symmetrical body-weight distribution training in stroke patients and its effect on fall prevention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1650–1654. pmid:11733877
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Fousekis K, Tsepis E, Vagenas G. Lower limb strength in professional soccer players: profile, asymmetry, and training age. J Sports Sci Med. 2010; 9: 364–373. pmid:24149628
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Haendlmayer KT, Harris NJ. Flatfoot deformity: an overview. Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23: 395–403.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Earls J. Born to walk: Myofascial efficiency and the body in movement. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books; 2014.
40. Mala L, Maly T, Zahalka F. Postural performance in the bipedal and unipedal stance of elite soccer players in different age categories. Acta Kinesiol. 2017; 11: 101–105.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Paillard T, Noe F, Riviere T, Marion V, Montoya R, Dupui P. Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition. J Athl Train. 2006; 41: 172–176. pmid:16791302
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Tiberio D. Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities. Physical Therapy. 1988; 68: 1840–1849. pmid:3194451
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Wright WG, Ivanenko YP, Gurfinkel VS. Foot anatomy specialization for postural sensation and control. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107: 1513–1521. pmid:22157121
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture. 2007; 26: 68–75. pmid:16945538
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Marencakova J, Svoboda Z, Vareka I, Zahalka F. Functional clinical typology of the foot and kinematic gait parameters. Acta Gymnica. 2016; 46: 74–81.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Desilva JM, Bonne-Annee R, Swanson Z, Gill CM, Sobel M, Uy J, et al. Midtarsal break variation in modern humans: Functional causes, skeletal correlates, and paleontological implications. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2015; 156(4): 543–552. pmid:25594359
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Desilva JM, Gill S V. Brief communication: A midtarsal (midfoot) break in the human foot. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013; 151(3): 495–499. pmid:23686391
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Gill S V., Keimig S, Kelty-Stephen D, Hung YC, DeSilva JM. The relationship between foot arch measurements and walking parameters in children. BMC Pediatr. 2016; 16(1): 2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0554-5
View Article
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Gill S V, Lewis CL, DeSilva JM. Arch Height Mediation of Obesity-Related Walking in Adults: Contributors to Physical Activity Limitations. Physiol J [Internet]. 2014; 2014: 1–8. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/physiology/2014/821482/
View Article
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Billis E, Katsakiori E, Kapodistrias C, Kapreli E. Assessment of foot posture: Correlation between different clinical techniques. Foot. 2007; 17: 65–72.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Beynnon BD, Murphy DF, Alosa DM. Predictive factors for lateral ankle sprains: a literature review. J Athl Train. 2002; 37: 376–380. pmid:12937558
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 585–593. pmid:10496574
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Queen RM, Mall NA, Nunley JA, Chuckpaiwong B. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 582–586. pmid:19157878
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Ekstrand J, Hagglund M, Walden M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 553–558. pmid:19553225
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 15: 267–270.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Wong P, Hong Y. Soccer injury in the lower extremities. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39: 473–482. pmid:16046325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Tropp H, Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Stabilometry in functional instability of the ankle and its value in predicting injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984; 16: 64–66. pmid:6708781
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Harrison P-L, Littlewood C. Relationship between pes planus foot type and postural stability. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2010; 4: 21–24.
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Dvorak J, Junge A. F–MARC/Manuál fotbalové medicíny. Praha: Olympia; 2008.

[ref19] 19. Junge A, Dvorak J. Soccer injuries: a review on incidence and prevention. Sports Med. 2004; 34: 929–938. pmid:15487905
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Maly T, Zahalka F, Mala L, Cech P. The bilateral strength and power asymmetries in untrained boys. Open Med. 2015; 10: 224–232.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Knapik JJ, Bauman CL, Jones BH, Harris JM, Vaughan L. Preseason strength and flexibility imbalances associated with athletic injuries in female collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 76–81. pmid:2008935
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] PubMed/NCBI

[74] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Lin YC, Thompson A, Kung JT, Chieh LW, Chou SW, Lin JC. Functional isokinetic strength ratios in baseball players with injured elbows. J Sport Rehabil. 2010; 19: 21–29. pmid:20231742
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Maly T, Sugimoto D, Izovska J, Zahalka F, Mala L. Effect of muscular strength, asymmetries and fatigue on kicking performance in soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2018; 39: 297–303. pmid:29506307
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Maly T, Zahalka F, Mala L. Unilateral and ipsilateral strength asymmetries in elite youth soccer players with respect to muscle group and limb dominance. Int J Morphol. 2016; 34: 1339–1344.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Inklaar H, Bol E, Schmikli SL, Mosterd W. Injuries in male soccer players: team risk analysis. Int J Sports Med. 1996; 17: 229–234. pmid:8739579
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Le Gall F, Carling C, Reilly T, Vandewalle H, Church J, Rochcongar P. Incidence of injuries in elite French youth soccer players: a 10-season study. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 928–938. pmid:16436535
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Philippaerts RM, Vaeyens R, Janssens M, Van Renterghem B, Matthys D, Craen R, et al. The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24: 221–230. pmid:16368632
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Smith EP, Hill AP, Hall HK. Perfectionism, Burnout and Depressive Symptoms in Youth Soccer Players: A Longitudinal Study. J Clin Sport Psychol. 2018: 1–34.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Harriss D, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med. 2015; 36: 1121–1124. pmid:26671845
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Kapteyn TS, Bles W, Njiokiktjien CJ, Kodde L, Massen CH, Mol JMF. Standardization in platform stabilometry being a part of posturography. Agressologie. 1983; 24: 321–326. pmid:6638321
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Dvorak R, Krainova Z, Janura M, Elfmark M. Standardizace metodiky klinického vyšetření stoje na dvou vahách. Rehab Fyz Lek. 2000; 3: 102–105.
View Article
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Queen RM, Mall NA, Hardaker WM, Nunley JA. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28: 456–462. pmid:17475140
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Villarroya MA, Esquivel JM, Tomás C, Moreno LA, Buenafé A, Bueno G. Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168: 559–567. pmid:18751725
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Onodera AN, Sacco ICN, Morioka EH, Souza PS, de Sá MR, Amadio AC. What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot. 2008; 18: 142–149.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Klementa J. Somatometrie nohy. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství; 1987.

[ref36] 36. Cheng PT, Wu SH, Liaw MY, Wong AM, Tang FT. Symmetrical body-weight distribution training in stroke patients and its effect on fall prevention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1650–1654. pmid:11733877
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Fousekis K, Tsepis E, Vagenas G. Lower limb strength in professional soccer players: profile, asymmetry, and training age. J Sports Sci Med. 2010; 9: 364–373. pmid:24149628
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Haendlmayer KT, Harris NJ. Flatfoot deformity: an overview. Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23: 395–403.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Earls J. Born to walk: Myofascial efficiency and the body in movement. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books; 2014.

[ref40] 40. Mala L, Maly T, Zahalka F. Postural performance in the bipedal and unipedal stance of elite soccer players in different age categories. Acta Kinesiol. 2017; 11: 101–105.
View Article
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Paillard T, Noe F, Riviere T, Marion V, Montoya R, Dupui P. Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition. J Athl Train. 2006; 41: 172–176. pmid:16791302
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study design

Subjects

Measurements and procedure

Assessment of postural stability and body weight distribution.

Assessment of foot typology.

Statistical analysis

Results

Physical characteristics and body weight distribution

Postural stability

Foot typology

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusions

Supporting information

S1 Table.

References