http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7519-6544
Figures
Abstract
Phosphorus (P), an essential macronutrient, is a prerequisite for various plant-growth mechanisms including root establishment/development, early/late vegetative stage development and reproductive stage development. Rice (Oryza sativa) is very sensitive to P starvation. Most cultivated genotypes have poor tolerance levels to P deficiency and consequently the grain yield is severely affected by P starvation. Since P deficiency of soils is a major concern of rice production areas, it is necessary to develop new cultivars with enhanced P tolerance. This is also an expectation of farmers and the Agriculture ministry of southern states of India where rice cultivation is intensive. Our objective was to introgress the phosphorus starvation tolerance (OsPSTOL1) gene through marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) in to two intermediate genetic stocks of popular local-varieties namely, ASD 16 and ADT 43 which harbour bacterial blight and blast resistance (R) genes. To delve into the P starvation phenotypic effect, we have generated a set of four backcross inbred lines (BILs) with enhanced P starvation tolerance. The developed BILs showed altered root architecture pattern and greater root surface area with increased P uptake, confirming their adaptability to P deficient soil conditions. Further, a correlation between root traits and low/high P conditions indicates the function of introgressed OsPSTOL1 in BILs. The enhanced root characteristics, therefore, enabled the plants to access and effectively absorb available nutrients from soil. In summary, the unique features of the OsPSTOL1 BILs with bacterial blight and blast resistance can aid varietal development suitable for cultivation in P deficient soils.
Citation: Chithrameenal K, Alagarasan G, Raveendran M, Robin S, Meena S, Ramanathan A, et al. (2018) Genetic enhancement of phosphorus starvation tolerance through marker assisted introgression of OsPSTOL1 gene in rice genotypes harbouring bacterial blight and blast resistance. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0204144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144
Editor: Manoj Prasad, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, INDIA
Received: March 22, 2018; Accepted: September 3, 2018; Published: September 27, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Chithrameenal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was funded by Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (GoI) through DST Women Scientist WOS-A program (No. SR/WOS-A/LS-146/2014) to KC and Biotechnology Information System (BTIS), DBT – GoI. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Rice (Oryza sativa L.), as one of the major staple crops of the world, feeds billions of people. Increases in the global population demand an equitable rise in grain production. However, a recent report indicates that the current trends in crop yield increases will not meet the future demands. The reasons for low rice productivity are 1) decline in natural resources, including nutrients and water, 2) climate change, 3) poor harvest indices of existing crop varieties, 4) prevalence of pest and diseases, and 5) physical soil deterioration. Thus, sustaining the crop yields under changing climatic conditions has become the focus of major rice breeding programs. One of the most effective strategies is to pyramid multiple stress tolerances (both abiotic and biotic) and resource use efficiencies into elite genetic backgrounds through repeated backcrossing and molecular marker-assisted selection.
Among the abiotic and biotic stresses, bacterial blight and blast disease and P deficiency are of primary importance in southern India. One of the key nutrient sources for crop growth is phosphorus which is vital for root growth and for various key metabolic processes including synthesis of membranes and nucleic acids [1,2]. Low P availability is a major constraint for the production of rice in Asia, Africa, and South America [3]. Soil P deficiency is normally scattered, identifiable by sick patches across field plots.
Phosphorus as phosphate form, often binds to organic matter or chemicals in soils, which renders soil and fertilizer P unavailable to plants; it also reduces fertilizer use efficiency unless hydrolysis takes place to release this bound inorganic phosphate [4]. Increased fertilizer costs and gradual depletion of phosphate rock (source of P fertilizer), set a need to develop plant types with enhanced P uptake efficiencyto address P starvation [5].
The efficiency of soil P use in rice plant relates to the trait “phosphorus uptake 1” (Pup1), a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 12 [6]. Pup1 was identified in a traditional “aus” rice genotype, Kasalath. Mapping studies have identified a protein kinase gene OsPSTOL1 which promotes extensive root growth, enabling enhanced uptake of P from the soil [7–11]. Metabolic promotion of root system by a serine-threonine kinase OsPSTOL1 in Indica rice genotype Sahbhagi Dhan has been reported [12]. The Pi starvation-induced (PSI) genes, OsPSTOL1 and purple acid phosphatase (PAPs) genes induce overexpression of a transcription factor, OsPHR2, under low P conditions [13]. Most of the modern rice cultivars lack Pup1 loci and thereby are highly susceptible to P starvation. Hence, introgression of OsPSTOL1 into elite rice cultivars is one strategy towards developing high-yielding genotypes suitable for low P soils.
A further limitation to rice growth is the blast, a devastating rice disease caused by the fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Blast disease can lead to yield losses of up to 80% [14]. So growing blast resistant rice varieties would be the most cost-effective method for sustaining rice productivity in areas where blast is an endemic disease. So far, over 100 blast resistance genes have been mapped, and several major resistance genes (R-genes), including Pib, Pita, Pid2, Pi9, Piz-t, Pi36, and Pi37, have been cloned [15,16,17]. However, only a few genes exhibit broad-spectrum blast resistance [18]. Introduction of a major broad-spectrum R-gene, Pi-khinto a blast-susceptible japonica cultivar, Taipei 309, enhanced its tolerance against blast by deposition of callose in the host cells[18].
Another most serious disease in rice cultivation is bacterial blight (BB) [19], caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae [20,21]. BB infection develops at the maximum tillering stage and leads to blighting of the leaves and a consequent yield loss of up to 80% [22]. Chemical control is ineffective; so, once again, the development and introduction of resistant cultivars is the most economical, effective, and safest method of controlling this disease [23,24]. Over 40 bacterial blight resistance genes have been identified with Mendelian inheritance [25,26]. However, transferring a single resistance gene is not effective due to significant shifts in the virulence pattern of the pathogen population which led to breakdown of resistance. The most sustainable strategy is to pyramid multiple BB resistant genes into a single rice variety to prevent or delay the breakdown of resistance [23].
Two short-duration rice varieties, ADT43 and ASD16, developed by the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Unversity are very popular among farmers and consumers of southern India (www.agritech.tnau.ac.in/expert_system/paddy), but both are susceptible to both bacterial blight [27] and blast [28] and also P starvation intolerant. In addition, the soils of over 60% of the rice-growing areas in south India are P limited [29] which neccessitates an external application of high quantities of phosphorus to support the growth of phosphorus starvation intolerant varieties. This situation necessitates a combined approach for genetic enhancement of rice genotypes for tolerance to low soil P or enhanced P uptake/utilization efficiency and resistance to multiple diseases. Our previous attempts have led to the development of a near-isogenic line (NIL) of ADT43 (CB14002) introgressed with three BB resistance genes (xa5, xa13 and Xa21) and a NIL of ASD16 (CB14004) pyramided with a blast resistance gene Pi54 and 3 major BB resistance genes (xa5, xa13 and Xa21) [27].
In the present study, our objective was to introgress and pyramid the major P starvation tolerance gene OsPSTOL1 into these NILs, ADT43 (CB14002) and ASD16 (CB14004) which already harbor major disease resistance genes for blast and BB. However, this would involve the pyramiding of several loci/genes. So phenotypic selection might not be ideal or accurate to track multiple-loci. We,therefore, utilized marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) using gene-specific markers for foreground selection and polymorphic SSRs for background selection. Our purpose was to develop superior backcrossed rice progenies and to subject the identified progenies to comprehensive phenotyping to test traits related to P uptake efficiency and disease resistance.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
We used two NILs, ASD16 and ADT43 with bacterial blight and blast resistance and IR74-Pup1 with OsPSTOL1 as parent materials to develop multiple diseases resistant P starvation-tolerant rice genotypes. The standard marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) strategy [30–32] was employed to pyramid the genes. To characterize the root architectural adaptations to low P availability, plants were grown in three different environments including pot culture, hydroponics and gelrite medium.
The crosses involved two near-isogenic lines namely CB 14002 and CB 14004 which were used as recurrent parents. CB 14002 isan advanced backcross (BC3F7) progeny of ADT43 (95.38% recovery of recurrent parent genome) having three BB resistance genes xa5, xa13 and Xa21.CB14004 is an advanced backcross (BC3F7) progeny of ASD16 (96.71% recovery of ASD16 genome) with a blast resistance gene Pi54 and threeBB resistance genes viz., xa5, xa13 and Xa21[33–37]. CB14002 and CB14004 exhibited a high level of stable resistance to BB and blast under field conditions [38]. Donor parent comprises a set of NILs in the genetic background of IR64 and IR74 harboring OsPSTOL1 loci from Kasalath (developed at IRRI, Philippines). Phenotypic evaluation of donor lines was carried out in the University field location(Paddy Breeding Station—TNAU, India, latitude: 11.003; longitude: 76.923; elevation: 419m). The results of the evaluation showed that IR74-Pup1 displaying good agronomic traits, compared toother lines in terms of early maturity, semi-dwarf, high tillering and compact panicles without awns (data not shown). The scheme of hybridization programme is shown in Fig 1.
Initially, the bacterial blight and blast resistance genes were pyramided independently in ASD16/ADT 43 vareities and named as CB14002/CB14004. The stabilized population harbouring bacterial blight and blast resistance genes were used as recurrent parent to introgress OsPSTOL1 gene.
DNA extraction and foreground selection
Genomic DNA fromyoung leaf sampleswas isolated by modified CTAB method [39]. For polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the isolated DNA wasdiluted with nuclease free water to a concentration of 40 ng/μl and stored at -20°C for further use. Gene specific markers were used to confirm target gene(s) in each backcross generation (Table 1). PCR amplification conditions maintained are as follows: OsPSTOL1 (94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 58°C for 45 s, 30°C for 90 s and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min); Pi54 (94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min and a final extension of 72°C for 7 min); xa13 (94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 59°C for 1 min, 72°C for 90 s and a final extension of 72°C for 7 min); Xa 21 (94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 65°C for 1 min, 72°C for 90 s and 72°C for 7 min) and xa5 (94°C for 5 min, 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, 72°C for 90 s and 72°C for 7 min).To figure the xa5 allelic pattern, 8 μl of PCR product was used for restriction digestion using BSRI enzyme at 65°C for 4h and separated on 1.5% agarose gel.
Background selection
Five hundred and twenty-three SSR markers, covering the entire length of all the 12 rice chromosomes were subjected to polymorphism survey of parental lines viz., CB14002, CB14004, and IR74-Pup1. We employed polymorphic marker-assisted background selection in BC1F1, BC2F1, and BC2F2 progenies to assess the recovery of the recurrent parent genome [40]. Additionally, we picturized RPG recovery using graphical genotypes (GGT) version 2.0 software [41].
Phenotyping of phosphorus starvation tolerance under pot culture conditions
Test genotypes CB14002 IL16, CB14002 IL69, CB14004 IL4 and CB14004 IL52 and parents were raised under greenhouse conditions. The experiment was set with a series of pots containing prescribed dosage of nutrient fertilizers (150 N: 50 P: 50K kg /ha) and another series of pots with low P soil(nutrient mixture except Pto mimic low P condition). P was given as a single basal dose, while the N and K in 3 split doses [42,43]. Two replications were retained for each treatment under completely randomized design. Observations on P-related traits viz., root length (cm), root weight (g), root P content (mg/g dry weight of root), shoot P content (mg/g dry weight of shoot) and total P contents (mg/g dry weight of plant) were notedfrom five plants in each replication, at harvesting stage. P content was measured colorimetrically by vanadomolybdate yellow color method [44].
Also, we have evaluated the agronomical performance of improved and parental lines under Pdef and Psuf at another location i.e. Agricultural college and research institute–Madurai, Tamil Nadu (9.925 Latitude and 78.119 Longitude) during summer’2018 (Mar’2018 to June’2018). The experiment was carried out in a 10 x 10m low P plot [less than 11 kg/ha of P; Pdef) and 10 x 10m normal soil [more than 11 kg/ha of P; Psuf]. Crops were cultivated by adopting normal cultivation practices as mentioned in http://agritech.tnau.ac.in/sri.html.
Evaluation for phosphorus starvation tolerance under hydroponic conditions
Yoshida nutrient solution [45] with 100% P and 50% P of phosphorus grade was formulated. Seeds of test genotypes (CB14002 IL16, CB14002 IL69, CB14004 IL4 and CB14004 IL52) along with parental controls were sprouted in moist paper towels and allowed to grow for ten days and later transferred to trays containing hydroponic solution. Two replications were maintained for each treatment under completely randomized design. The pH was maintained at 5.0, and the solution wasreplenished every two weeks. After 50 days of transplanting, full plants were collected individually and observations on root length (cm) and root biomass (g) were recorded. The plant roots and shoots were sampled to measure P content [44].
Evaluation of root system architecture in the parents and backcrossed lines
Seeds were incubated at 37°C for 3 days to break the dormancy and sprouted in half strength MS media [46] with 0.3% gelrite containing two P levels (100% P and 50% P). Tubes were later placed inside a tissue-culture chamber for 14 days (4000 Lux, 25°C, and 16 h day/8h dark), and root zone wascaptured at a uniform angle, and magnification using a high-resolution digital camcorder. The parameters viz., average root width (cm), network depth (cm), maximum number of roots, network area (cm2) and network length (cm) were measured adopting the “GiA Roots” program[47].
Evaluation of parents and backcrossed lines against blast and BB diseases
A uniform blast nursery (UBN) method was adopted for the artificial screening of parental lines and backcrossed lines for their responses to blast disease. Each entry was grown in a row of 70 cm long and 10 cm apart. A local susceptible variety CO39 was raised in between every five lines of BILs and parents. The entire nursery was bordered by a row of the susceptible variety CO39 and excessive nitrogen (100–120 kg N/ha) was given (½N as basal and ½ at 15 days after sowing) to all the entries. Blast pathogen isolates that were available at the Department of Plant Pathology, TNAU, Coimbatore, India were utilized for inoculation. Nursery beds were smeared with a mixture of blast spore suspension 1 x 105 conidia/ml & 2% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMS) and plants were covered with polythene sheets during the night time. Scoring of test entries was performed through SES scale and readings on leaf blast severity in test entries were collected at 10-day intervals from 25 to 30 DAS [48,49].
For screening against BB pathogen, each test entry was raised with a spacing of 20 x 15 cm in two rows of 70 cm length. The nursery was encircled by 3 to 4 border rows of local susceptible variety ADT38. The resistant check variety IRBB60 was raised in between every five lines of BILs and parents. Adequate level of nitrogen (150 kg N/ha) was applied. Peptone sucrose agar was used to sub-culture the pathogen and 48-hour old pure slant culture was used to prepare cell suspension (10 ml sterile water per slant to get 108 to 109CFU/ml). Plants were inoculated atthe maximum tillering and booting stages [50]. Inoculations were done using scissors rinsedin bacterial suspension to cut the top 2 to 3 cm of leaves. Disease severity scoring was done after 15 days of inoculation visually by measuring the lesion size by following SES scale. Test entries with lesion length of < 5 cm were recorded as resistant and those with > 5 cm were scored as susceptible [51,52]. The homozygous BC2F3 lines, recipient parental lines (ADT43, ASD16) and local susceptible check ADT38 were evaluated along with the resistant control, IRBB60.
Evaluation of agronomic performance and grain quality
In the BC2F4 generation, pyramided lines along with the parents were assessed for agronomic performance in a randomized complete block design with two replications with 20 x 15 cm plant spacing. The experiment was carried out at the Paddy breeding station of the TNAU, India;latitude: 11.003; longitude: 76.923; elevation: 419m). The data of five plants in each replication were recorded for various agronomic characters viz., days to 50% flowering (DFF), plant height (PH), number of productive tillers per plant (NPT), flag leaf length (FL), flag leaf breadth (FB), panicle length (PL), panicle breadth (PB), shoot biomass per plant (SB), number of filled grains per panicle (NFG), spikelet fertility (SF), 1000 grain weight (GW) and single plant yield (SPY) using the standard evaluation system of rice (IRRI 2002) [49]. The grain quality traits including hulling percentage, milling percentage, head rice recovery (HRR), kernel length before cooking (KLBC), kernel breadth before cooking (KBBC), length to breadth ratio (L/B), kernel length after cooking (KLAC), kernel breadth after cooking (KBAC), linear elongation ratio (LER), breadthwise expansion ratio (BER), volume expansion ratio (VER) and alkali spreading value (ASV) were determined [53].
Statistical analysis
Breeding program.
Dendrograms were built based on sequential agglomerative hierarchical nesting (SAHN) based unweight pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) using numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system (NTSYS-PC) computer package [54], to ascertain genetic relationships and phylogeny. For assessment of agronomic performance and grain quality, data were subjected to ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD to compare the genotypic means. In addition, a phylogenetic tree was drawn based on agronomic data using the DARwin package (http://darwin.cirad.fr/).
Results
Development of gene pyramided BILs of ADT43 and ASD16
Among the three OsPSTOL1-specific markers (K 29–1, K 29–2, and K 29–3), K 29–3 showed clear scorable polymorphism between the parents with unambiguous banding pattern when compared to K 29–1 and K 29–2 (S1 Fig). Thus, K 29–3 was used as foreground marker. Additionally, OsPSTOL1 is verified through K46-1 marker analysis, to avoid recombination residues in OsPSTOL1 region (S2 Fig). For background selection, polymorphism survey amongthe rice lines (IR74-Pup1, CB14002 and CB14004) was conducted using 523 genome-wide SSR markers. This studyidentified 81 polymorphic markers for CB14002/IR74-Pup1cross and 109 polymorphic markers for CB14004/IR74-Pup1 cross (S1 Table and S2 Table). Homozygous lines for OsPSTOL1, blast and blight resistance genes with high recurrent parent genome contribution were found in BC2F2 generation (S3 Fig & S4 Fig). Homozygous plants for OsPSTOL1 loci were later verified for blast (Pi54) and three (xa13, Xa21, and xa5) bacterial blight resistance genes using sequence tagged site (STS) markers (S5 Fig). A step-by-step procedure for BIL development and results obtained in each generation have been explained in the S1 Text.
Evaluation of parents and backcrossed lines for phosphorus-starvation tolerance
Parental lines and progenies of four BC2F3 lines (two in CB14002 genetic background and two in CB14004 background) were tested at two P levels (0 and 100%). BC lines showed higher root length when compared to recurrent parents under low P conditions (Fig 2). In case of total P uptake, all the improved lines except CB 14004-IL4 had shown increased P uptake compared to their respective recurrent parents. But the root P uptake by all the four BILs was higher than the recipients, CB 14002 (0.06 mg/g) and CB 14004 (0.011 mg/g) under ‘0’ P applied condition (Fig 3).
(a) Plants were grown under P deficient soil condition. The roots of improved and unimproved genotypes were shown in the image (b) Evaluation ofroot system architecture in BC2F3progenies under in-vitro conditions using MS+ gelrite medium. CB14002 genome background: i-iii = control; iv-vi = treatment; (i) CB14002(ii) CB14002 x IR74-Pup1 (iii) IR74-Pup1(iv) CB14002 (v) CB14002 x IR74-Pup1 (vi) IR74-Pup1. CB14004 genome background: i-iii = control; iv-vi = treatment;(i) CB14004 (ii) CB14004 x IR74-Pup1 (iii) IR74-Pup1 (iv) CB14004 (v) CB14004 x IR74-Pup1 (vi) IR74-Pup1.Statisticalvalues were provided in Fig 4.
Shaded -improved lines; unshaded -unimproved. Mean of two replicates and standard deviations are shown. No significant statistical difference observed. Equality of variances and normality of variables were validated by F-test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, respectively).
Parental lines and OsPSTOL1 introgressed lines were tested for their responses under two different levels of P (100% P and 50% P) in hydroponic conditions. CB14002IL69 showed higher root weight compared to its recurrent parent at moderate P stress (50% P). In case of total Puptake, CB14002IL69 outperformed the parents under low P condition (Fig 3).
The feild evaluation of improved lines having OsPSTOL1 under low P revealed that grain yield of improved lines was significantly higher than recurrent parental lines (S1 Appendix). Recurrent parents showed nearly 12.5% reduction in yield under P-deficient conditions, whereas only a 2.5% yield reduction was noticed in ILs and donor lines under low P conditions.
Effect of OsPSTOL1 on root system architecture under normal and low P conditions
Two BC progenies viz., CB14002 IL16 and CB14004 IL52 with acceptable agronomic and physiological performance in pot culture experiment were chosen and investigated for root architecture along with the donor and recipient parents through digital imaging. BC2F3 homozygous lines showed the maximum root number (132 to 144) compared to their respective recipient lines (118 to 119) under low P conditions (50% P). CB14004 IL52 showed higher network depth of 0.997 cm than the recipient parent (0.901 cm). Homozygous lines CB14002 IL16 (54.17 cm) and CB14004 IL52 (49.02 cm) showed increased network length when compared to their respective recipient parents under low phosphorus supply (Fig 4). Many of the P-related traits were at better correlation showing concurrent development in root system root system architecture (RSA)(Table 2).
Mean values were Log transformed; SE- shown as bars.
Evaluation of BILs for blast and bacterial blight resistance
CB14004 IL4 and CB14004 IL52,retaining the broad-spectrum blast resistant gene Pi54 showed high resistance to blast with a score of 1 (Fig 5). All the pyramided lines CB14002 IL16, CB14002 IL69, CB14004 IL4 and CB14004 IL52 harboring xa13, xa5 and Xa21 exhibited a high level of resistance to BB (lesion length of less than 3.5cm)(Fig 6).
Scoring of test entries was made through SES scale and readings on leaf blast severity in test entries at 10 days intervals from 25 to 30 DAS.
Mean lesion length seen on 10 DAI. The graph shows mean value with calculated SD.
Cluster analysis
Two dendrograms (one for CB14002 genetic background and the other for CB14004 background) were generated based on the SSR data gathered in the background selection. Based on the dendrogram generated for CB14002 background, 5 genotypes, including the recurrent parent were grouped into two major clusters. Cluster I comprised CB14002 IL16 and CB14002 IL7 and cluster II comprised recurrent parent CB14002 and other pyramids CB14002 IL38, CB14002 IL69. In cluster II, CB14002 and CB14002 IL69 were adjacent to each othermaking a single line. In case of CB14004 background, there were two major clusters, cluster I and cluster II. Cluster I had CB14004 IL23 and cluster II posses CB14004 IL4, CB14004 IL52, and CB14004, in which CB14004 and CB14004 IL52 formed a single line (S1 Fig).
Agronomic performance and grain quality characters of BILs
The agronomic performance of the advanced backcross-derived lines in BC2F4 generation was on par with the respective recurrent parent for most of the traits examined (Table 3). Two promising improved five-gene pyramids in CB14002 and two four-gene pyramids in CB14004 lines at BC2F4 generation, along with the donor and recipient parents were evaluated during the wet season of 2017 at TNAU, Coimbatore, India. The recipient parents, CB14002 and CB14004 recorded mean grain yield of 35.00 g/plant and 33.10 g/plant respectively, while the donor parent (IR74 Pup1) recorded 26.65 g/plant. The test entries viz., CB 14002 IL6 & 69 and CB14004 IL4 & 52 had higher grain yields than their respective recurrent parent. The improved lines showed nosignificant variation as compared to recurrent parent in terms of days for flowering, number of productive tillers, shoot biomass, and particularly for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) characters. The genetic distance coefficient on twelve agro-morphologic traits of two pyramids and two parental lines revealed that all the pyramided lines were identical to the recipient parent. CB14002 and CB14004 were clubbed in a single cluster while in another cluster, only a solitary line, the donor parent IR74 Pup1 was accommodated (S6 Fig). Most of the selections showed nearly similar performance to the recipient parents (CB 14002 and CB 14004) for grain quality traits. The line CB 14004 IL4 derived from CB 14004 showed increased kernel length than the recipient. In case of HRR (Head Rice Recovery), the improved lines performed more or less similar to their respective recipient parents. The two lines CB 14004 IL4 (8.5 mm) and CB 14004 IL52 (8.6 mm) reached higher KLAC values than the recipient CB 14004 (8.1 mm). CB 14002 derived lines showed higher ASV value (ASV 3) than the recipient CB 14002 (ASV 6) (Table 4).
Discussion
Gene pyramiding and fixation
Among various factors that limit rice productivity, bacterial and fungal diseases, and nutrient stress factors rank next to the environmental stresses. Severe disease prevalence and limitation of natural resources, including water, nutrients, etc., are posing the serious threat to rice productivity and hence genetic improvement of rice lines for disease resistance and resource use efficiency is one of the immediate long-term objectives in rice breeding. The gene OsPSTOL1 showed to promote enhanced P uptake in rice [7–10]. In this study, a phosphorus starvation tolerance gene OsPSTOL1, a broad-spectrum blast resistance gene Pi54 and 3 different BB resistance genes xa5, xa13 and Xa21 were introgressed and pyramided by following a carefully planned breeding programme. Marker-assisted backcrossing was followed up to BC2F1 and selfed to produce BC2F3. Selected back-cross progenies showed 86 to 89% of recurrent parent genome at BC2F3 generation. Graphical genotyping followed by construction of dendrogram using the genotyping data demonstrated that the selected backcross progenies are closer to their respective recurrent parents CB14002 and CB14004. High-level phosphorus uptake efficiency disease resistance to blast and BB were proved in the homozygous lines of BC2F3 through phenotypic screening. Similar investigations were published for marker-assisted gene pyramiding in different rice varieties for various stress conditions [40,51,52,55–60]. Stringent phenotypic selection was made in the BC2F4 generation for agronomic performance and for grain and cooking quality traits. All the selected improved lines tolerated low P condition by showing better performance than recipients and also with acceptable grain quality and yield traits.
Phosphorus starvation tolerance
Phosphorus plays a vital part in the architecture and growth of the plant [61]. Higher grain yields under phosphorus deficiency can be accomplished by enhancing the P uptake from soil and intensifying the effective internal use of phosphorus in dry matter and the grain production. But very limited success have been reported so far [62]. The commercial, modern and new varieties show higher yields owing to the high harvest index. It was earlier hypothesised that greater increases in grain yield under phosphorus deficiency can occur by increasing the phosphorus uptake [63]. Hence, we planned to raise the phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) in crop plants to keep higher yield at low P soil [64]. Vegetative stage PUE should be improved in order to increase P uptake through any breeding approach. In soil-based screening experiments, P uptake varied between the genotypes, but the same results might not be echoed when genotypic diversity in PUE was examined [7,65]. This may be due to the difference in internal phosphorus use efficiency among the genotypes. Therefore, the current investigation was undertaken to increase the P uptake efficiency of few promising varieties of south India.
Evaluation of BC2F3 progenies, introgressed with OsPSTOL1 gene under low P conditions demonstrated the significant differences between the parents and improved lines in terms of PUE. It is clear from the measure of root P content that all the four BILs exhibited enhanced P uptake efficiency on par with the donor under low P conditions when compared to the respective recipients. Eventhough the BIL CB14004-IL4 showed reduced total P uptake compared to the recipient CB 14004, the root P content was higher in the BILs. This proves the role of OsPSTOL1 in enhancing the root morphology. Root system architecture and morphology can improve the P uptake under P deficient condition [66]. BC2F3 progenies introgressed with OsPSTOL1 showed desirable root system architecture in gelrite media thus ensuring the lines’ ability to forage more water and nutrients from the soil under low P condition. BC progenies were found to have increased root network length and higher root number than the recipients under P starved condition. This observation was supported by the previous research finding by Wissuwa [7] in which it was stated that OsPSTOL1 had positively influenced root morphology and root hair density which would strongly influence nutrient acquisition by plants.
In two identical screening experiments, and in field evaluation the improved lines showed better yield performance than recurrent cultivars. Field evaluation showed that an approximate of 10% yield is retained in improved lines under low P conditions. In our studies, improved lines performed physically better in low P conditions which demonstrates the field performance of the gene. A clear picture may be generated through further screening with higher sample size in developed rice lines. Although the high-throughput root phenotyping methods have the potential to explore the functions of an OsPSTOL1 allele, selection of desired cultivars requires cross-validation with root parameters under field conditions.
Disease resistance
Blast ranks first among the rice diseases affecting rice productivity in Asia because of its wide distribution and high incidence levels during growth seasons once conditions are favorable. It has been already demonstrated that pyramiding multiple blast resistant genes exhibiting resistance to multiple races/pathotypes is a powerful strategy to build broad and durable resistance in new cultivars [67]. The blast resistant gene Pi-kh (Pi54) confers a broad spectrum resistance for several races or isolates of M. oryzae [18]. In our bioassays, artificial screening of BC2F3 progenies revealed that all the BC progenies that were screened showed a high level of resistance which proved the efficacy of Pi54 as reported earlier [40,68]. Bacterial blight is the second most devastating disease affecting rice cultivation in major rice-growing areas of Asia [22]. Several BB resistant genes have been mapped and a combination of three genes (xa5, xa13,and Xa21) is reported to be effective against bacterial blight isolates in major growing regions of the world [31,40,69]. Results of this study also endorsed the effectiveness of the combination of the above three genes against the Xoo isolates. In combination, these R genes are highly effective for atleast majority of races, if not all.
This study demonstrated the efficiency of marker-assisted backcross breeding combined with phenotyping in developing rice genotypes with improved disease resistance and enhanced level of tolerance to P starvation. These improved versions have to undergo a rigorous evaluation under field conditions for yield, disease resistance and tolerance for low P to assess its performance over locations in the subsequent years. Upon successful evaluation, these lines are expected toassist the farmers for cultivation in P limited soils.
Conclusions
Strategies to develop cultivars with good nutrient use efficiency and durable resistance to pests and diseases are relying on the introgression of multiple genes into susceptible cultivars. Results of this study demonstrated accelerated development of rice genotypes upgraded for disease resistance and nutrient use/uptake efficiency through MABB. The fullest success of this work will provide a roadmap to rice breeders to undertake molecular breeding as a tool for developing resilient rice cultivars possessing disease resistance and P use efficiency. In the future, these lines will be forwarded to yield trials over multiple locations to study the stability in performance for the target traits. Furthermore, these backcrossed lines can be used as donor parents in breeding programmes, andcan also serve as a potential base material for studying host-pathogen interactions combined with P tolerance.
Supporting information
S1 Appendix. Total grain yield (kg/ha) of improved and parental lines under Pdef and Psuf conditions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Text. Brief note on the development of BILs pyramided with OsPSTOL1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s002
(DOCX)
S1 Fig.
Agarose gel electrophoresis pattern of gene based markers viz., (a) K 29–1, (b) K 29–2, (c) K 29–3 located within OsPSTOL1 between the parents.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s003
(TIF)
S2 Fig. K46-1 marker-based confirmation of OsPSTOL1 gene in developed backcross progenies.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s004
(TIF)
S3 Fig.
(A)Graphical view of recovery of recurrent parent genome in BC2F2 lines of (i) CB 14002 X IR 74-Pup1 (Plant # 16, #69, #38 and #7) and (ii) CB 14004 X IR 74-Pup1 cross (Plant #52, #4 and #23). A, proportion of recurrent parent genome and H, proportion of heterozygous loci. (B) Genetic relatedness analysis of (i) CB14002 and, (ii) CB14004 derived lines through construction of dendrogram using SSR genotyping data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s005
(TIF)
S4 Fig. Graphical view of recovery of recurrent parent genome in BC2F2 single plant with high RPGR.
(A) CB 14002 X IR 74-Pup1 (B) CB 14004 X IR 74-Pup1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s006
(TIF)
S5 Fig.
Foreground selection ofBC2F2 progenies using markers specific to (a) OsPSTOL1 (K 29-3F, 3R); (b) Pi54 (Pi 54 MAS); (c) xa13 (using xa13F and xa13R); (d) Xa21 (using Xa21F and Xa21R and (e) xa5 (using xa5_1F and xa5_1R). A, homozygous recurrent parent allele; H, heterozygous and B, homozygous donor allele respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s007
(TIF)
S6 Fig. Neighbour-joining tree based on agro-morphological data.
Numerical values were used to draw the tree in DARwin. (A high bootstrap value of 30k was made to get better results. Since the tree had a agronomically distant IR74 Pup1 lines, we didnot includ outgroup in the analysis).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s008
(TIF)
S1 Table. List of polymorphic SSR markers used for background selection in CB 14002 X IR 74-Pup1 cross.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s009
(PDF)
S2 Table. List of polymorphic SSR markers used for background selection in the CB 14004 X IR 74-Pup1 cross.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204144.s010
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (GoI) for supporting the research through DST Women Scientist WOS-A program (No. SR/WOS-A/LS-146/2014) and Biotechnology Information System (BTIS), DBT–GoI for financial assistance. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This study was part of the Ph.D. research work of the first author, K.C.We acknowledge Mr. Jothi Basu for assistance in root system architecture studies.
References
- 1. Mukherjee A., Sarkar S., Chakraborty A.S., Yelne R., Kavishetty V., Biswas T., et al.Phosphate acquisition efficiency and phosphate starvation tolerance locus (PSTOL1) in rice. Journal of genetics. 2014. 93(3), pp.683–688. pmid:25572226
- 2. Raghothama K. G., and Karthikeyan A. S. Phosphate acquisition. Plant and Soil.2005. 274, 37–49.
- 3. Neelam K., Thakur S., Neha I.S.Y., Kumar K., Dhaliwal S.S. and Singh K., Novel alleles of Phosphorus-Starvation Tolerance 1 gene (PSTOL1) from Oryza rufipogon confers high phosphorus uptake efficiency. Frontiers in plant science. 2017. 8. pmid:28443109
- 4. Kaushik P., and Garg V. K., Dynamics of biological and chemical parameters during vermicomposting of solid textile mill sludge mixed with cow dung and agricultural residues. Bioresource Technol.2004. 94, 203–209.
- 5. Heuer S., Gaxiola R., Schilling R., Herrera‐Estrella L., López‐Arredondo D., Wissuwa M. et al., Improving phosphorus use efficiency: a complex trait with emerging opportunities. The Plant Journal. 2017. 90, pp.868–885. pmid:27859875
- 6. Wissuwa M., Yano M., and Ae N. Mapping of QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.). Theor Appl Genet.1998. 97, 777–783.
- 7. Wissuwa M., and Ae N. Further characterization of two QTLs that increase phosphorus uptake of rice (Oryza sativaL.) under phosphorus deficiency. Plant and Soil. 2001. 237, 275–286.
- 8. Wissuwa M., Wegner J., Ae N., and Yano M. Substitution mapping of Pup1: a major QTL increasing phosphorus uptake of rice from a phosphorus-deficient soil. Theor Appl Genet.2002. 105, 890–897. pmid:12582914
- 9. Chin J. H., Lu X., Stephan M., Gamuyao H. R., Ismail A., Wissuwa M., et al. Development and application of gene based markers for the major rice QTL Phosphorus uptake 1. Theor. Appl. Genet.2010. 120, 1073–1086. pmid:20035315
- 10. Gamuyao H. R., Chin J. H., Pariasca-Tanaka J., Pesaresi P., Catausan S., Dalid C., et al. The protein kinase PSTOL1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature. 2012.488, 535–539. pmid:22914168
- 11. Yumnam J.S., Rai M. and Tyagi W. Allele mining across two low-P tolerant genes PSTOL1 and PupK20-2 reveals novel haplotypes in rice genotypes adapted to acidic soils. Plant Genetic Resources. 2017. 15(3), pp.221–229.
- 12. Tyagi W. and Rai M. Root transcriptomes of two acidic soil adapted Indica rice genotypes suggest diverse and complex mechanism of low phosphorus tolerance. Protoplasma. 2017. 254(2), pp.725–736. pmid:27228993
- 13. Wu P., Shou H., Xu G., and Lian X. Improvement of phosphorus efficiency in rice on the basis of understanding phosphate signalling and homeostasis. Current Opinion in Plant Biol.2013. 16, 205–212.
- 14.
Ou S.H. Rice Disease, 2nd edn. CMI, Kew, England, 1985. 61–96.
- 15. Qu S., Liu G., Zhou B., Bellizzi M., Zeng L., Dai L., et al. The Broad-Spectrum Blast Resistance Gene Pi9 Encodes a Nucleotide-Binding Site–Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein and Is a Member of a Multigene Family in Rice. Genetics. 2006.172, 1901–1914. pmid:16387888
- 16. Lin F., Chen S., Que Z., Wang L., Liu X., and Pan Q. The Blast Resistance Gene Pi37 Encodes a Nucleotide Binding Site–Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein and Is a Member of a Resistance Gene Cluster on Rice Chromosome 1. Genetics.2007.177, 1871–1880. pmid:17947408
- 17.
Mc Couch S. R., Nelson R. J., Thome J., and Zeigler R. S. “Mapping of blast-resistance genes in rice” in Zeigler RS, Leong SA, Teng PS. Rice blast disease, CAB International, Wallingford, 1994. 167–187.
- 18. Rai A. K., and Kumar S. P. Functional complementation of rice blast resistance gene Pi-k h (Pi54) conferring resistance to diverse strains of Magnaporthe oryzae.J.Plant Biochem. Biotechnol.2011. 20(1), 55–65.
- 19. Mew T.W. Current status and future prospects of research on bacterial blight of rice. Ann. Rev. of Phytol.1987. 25,359–382.
- 20. Wang G.L. and Valent B. Durable resistance to rice blast. Science. 2017. 355(6328), pp.906–907. pmid:28254898
- 21. Sakulkoo W., Osés-Ruiz M., Garcia E.O., Soanes D.M., Littlejohn G.R., Hacker , et al. A single fungal MAP kinase controls plant cell-to-cell invasion by the rice blast fungus. Science. 2018. 359(6382), pp.1399–1403. pmid:29567712
- 22. Mew T.W., Alvarez A. M., Leach J. E., and Swings J. Focus on bacterial blight of rice. Plant Dis.1993. 77, 5–12.
- 23.
Khush G.S., MacKill D.J., and Sidhu G.S. “Breeding rice for resistance to bacterial blight” in Bacterial blight of rice, Proc. Int. Workshop Bact. Blight Rice. IRRI, Manila, the Philippines.1989. 207–217.
- 24. Ogawa T. Methods and strategy for monitoring race distribution and identification of resistance genes to bacterial leaf blight (Xanthomonas campestris pv oryzae) in rice. JARQ. 1993. 27, 71–80.
- 25. Chen S., Liu X., Zeng L., Ouyang D., Yang J., and Zhu X. Genetic analysis and molecular mapping of a novel recessive gene xa34(t) for resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.Theor. Appl. Genet.2011. 122, 1331–1338. pmid:21274511
- 26. Kim S. M., Pil J., Yang S., Tae Q., Noh H., Reinke R. F., et al. Identification and fine - mapping of a new resistance gene, Xa40, conferring resistance to bacterial blight races in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015. 128, 1933–1943. pmid:26081948
- 27. Perumalsamy S., Bharani M., Sudha M., Nagarajan P., Arul L., Saraswathi R., et al. Functional marker-assisted selection for bacterial leaf blight resistance genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Breed.2010. 129, 400–406
- 28. Shanmugam T.R., Sendhil R., and Thirumavalavan V. Quantification and prioritizing of constraints causing yield loss in rice (Oryza sativa) in India. Agricultura Tropicae Subtropica. 2006. 39, 194–205.
- 29. Hasan R. Phosphorus Status of Soils in India. Better Crops Intl. 1996. 10(2), 4–5.
- 30. Singh V. K., Singh A., Singh S. P., Ellur R. K., Choudhary V., Sarkel S., et al. Incorporation of blast resistance into “PRR78”, an elite Basmati rice restorer line, through marker assisted backcross breeding. Field Crops Res.2012. 128, 8–16.
- 31. Joseph M., Gopalakrishnan S., Sharma R. K., Singh V. P., Singh A. K., Singh N, K., et al. Combining bacterial blight resistance and Basmati quality characteristics by phenotypic and molecular marker assisted selection in rice. Mol. Breed.2004. 13, 377–387.
- 32. Ellur R.K., Khanna A., Yadav A., Pathania S., Rajashekara H., Singh V.K., Krishnan S.G., Bhowmick P.K., Nagarajan M., Vinod K.K. and Prakash G. Improvement of Basmati rice varieties for resistance to blast and bacterial blight diseases using marker assisted backcross breeding. Plant Science. 2016. 242, pp.330–341. pmid:26566849
- 33.
Perumalsamy, S. Marker assisted selection for bacterial leaf blight resistant genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). [master’s thesis]. [Coimbatore (TN)]: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. 2008.
- 34.
Amudhan, R. Marker assisted selection for bacterial leaf blight resistant genes in advanced generation of rice (Oryza sativa L.). [master’s thesis]. [Coimbatore (TN)]: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. 2009.
- 35.
Ganpatrao, W.S. Introgression of blast resistance genes into bacterial blight pyramided genotype of rice through molecular marker assisted selection [master’s thesis]. [Coimbatore (TN)]: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. 2011.
- 36.
Gupta, R.K. Marker assisted introgression of blast resistance genes into bacterial blight pyramided genotype in rice. [master’s thesis]. [Coimbatore (TN)]: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. 2012.
- 37.
Chaithra, L.T. Introgression of multiple disease resistance in rice through marker assisted breeding. [master’s thesis]. [Coimbatore (TN)]: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. 2017.
- 38. Sakthivel K., Gautam R.K., Manigundan K., Singh R., Ramalingam J., Laha G.S., Kumar A. and Velazhahan R. The host background of rice influences the resistance expression of a three genes pyramid (xa5+ xa13+ Xa21) to bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) pathotypes of Indian mainland and Bay islands. Plant Breeding. 2017. 136(3), pp.357–364.
- 39. Dellaporta S.L., Wood J., and Hicks J.B. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter. 1983. 1(4), 19–21.
- 40. Sundaram R. M., Vishnupriya M. R., Biradar S. K., Laha G. S., Reddy G.A., Rani N.S., et al. Marker assisted introgression of bacterial blight resistance in Samba Mahsuri, an elite indica variety. Euphytica. 2008160, 411–422.
- 41. Van Berloo R. GGT: software for display of graphical genotypes. J. Hered. 1999. 90, 328–329.
- 42. Haefele S. M., and Wopereis M. C. S. Spatial variability of indigenous supplies for N, P and K and its impact on fertilizer strategies for irrigated rice in West Africa. Plant and Soil. 2005. 270, 57–72.
- 43. Hossain M. F., White S. K., Elahi S. F., Sultana N., Choudhury M.H.K., Alam Q.K., et al.The efficiency of nitrogen fertiliser for rice in Bangladeshi farmers’ fields. Field Crops Res.2005. 93, 94–107.
- 44.
Piper C. S. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans publisher, Bombay. 1966.
- 45.
Yoshida S. and Parog F.T. “Climatic influence on yield and yield components of low land rice in tropics” in Climate and Rice. IRRI, P.O. Box.933, Manila. 1976. 471–494.
- 46. Murashige T., and Skoog F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum.1962. 15(3), 473–497.
- 47. Galkovskyi T., Mileyko Y., Bucksch A., Moore B., Symonova O., Price C.A., et al. GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture. BMC plant biology. 2012. 12(1), p.116.
- 48. Roumen E., Levy M., and Notteghem J. L. Characterisation of the European pathogen population of Magnaporthe grisea by DNA fingerprinting and pathotype analysis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1997. 103, 363–371.
- 49.
IRRI. Standard Evaluation System for Rice (SES). 4th Edn Los Banos; Philippines: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). 2002. 15–16.
- 50. Kauffman H. E., Reddy A. P. K., Hsien S. P. Y., and Merca S. D. An improved technique for evaluating resistance of rice varieties to Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. 1973. 57, 537–541.
- 51. Dokku P., Das K. M., and Rao G. J. N. Pyramiding of four resistance genes of bacterial blight in Tapaswini, an elite rice cultivar, through marker assisted selection. Euphytica. 2013a. 192, 87–96.
- 52. Dokku P., Das K. M., and Rao G. J. N. Genetic enhancement of host-plant resistance of the Lalat cultivar of rice against bacterial blight employing marker assisted selection. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013b. 35, 1339–1348.
- 53. Gopalakrishnan S., Sharma R, K., Rajkumar K, A., Joseph M., Singh V, P., Singh A. K., et al. Integrating marker assisted background analysis with foreground selection for identification of bacterial blight resistant recombinants in Basmati rice. Plant Breed.2008. 127, 131–139.
- 54.
Rohlf F. J. NTSYS-PC Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 1.60. New York, NY: Applied Biostatistics. 1990.
- 55. Huyen L. T. N., Cuc L. M., Ismail A. M., and Ham L. H. Introgression of the salinity tolerance QTLs Saltol into AS996, the elite rice variety of Vietnam. Am. J. Plant Sci.2012. 3, 981–987.
- 56. Suh J. P., Jeung J. U., Noh T. H., Cho Y. C., Park S. H., Park H. S., et al. Development of breeding lines with three pyramided resistance genes that confer broad-spectrum bacterial blight resistance and their molecular analysis in rice. Rice.2013.6:5. pmid:24280417
- 57. Kumar A., Dixit S., Ram T., Yadaw R. B., Mishra K. K., and Madal N. P. Breeding high yielding drought-tolerant rice: genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 2014.65, 6265–6278. pmid:25205576
- 58. Divya B., Robin S., Rabindran R., Senthil S., Raveendran M., and Joel A. J. Marker assisted backcross breeding approach to improve blast resistance in Indian rice (Oryza sativa) variety ADT 43. Euphytica.2014. 200, 61–77.
- 59. Guo L., and Ye G. Use of major quantitative trait loci to improve grain yield of rice. Rice Sci. 2014. 21, 65–82.
- 60. Pradhan S. K., Nayak D. K., Mohanty S., Behera L., Barik S. R., Pandit E., et al. Pyramiding of three bacterial blight resistance genesfor broad spectrum resistance in deep water rice variety, Jalmagna. Rice.2015.8:19.
- 61. Zhang Y., Anis G.B., Wang R., Wu W., Yu N., Shen X., et al. Genetic dissection of QTL against phosphate deficiency in the hybrid rice ‘Xieyou9308’. Plant Growth Regulation.2017. pp.1–11.
- 62. Wissuwa M., Mazzola M., and Picard C. Novel approaches in plant breeding for rhizosphere-related traits. Plant and Soil.2009. 321, 409–430.
- 63.
Jones B. J., and Case V. W. “Sampling, handling and analyzing plant samples” in Weatherman R. L. (Ed.); Soil testing and plant analysis.III EDs. Soil Sci. Soc. America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 1990.
- 64. Yugandhar P., Basava R.K., Desiraju S., Voleti S.R., Sharma R.P. and Neelamraju S. Identifying markers associated with yield traits in Nagina22 rice mutants grown in low phosphorus field or in alternate wet/dry conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2017. 11(5), p.548.
- 65. Rose T. J., Liu L., and Wissuwa M. Improving phosphorus efficiency in cereal crops: is breeding for reduced grain phosphorus concentration part of the solution? Fron. Plant Sci.2013. 4, 444. pmid:24204376
- 66. Magalhaes J.V., de Sousa S.M., Guimaraes C.T. and Kochian L.V. The role of root morphology and architecture in phosphorus acquisition: physiological, genetic, and molecular basis. In Plant Macronutrient Use Efficiency. 2018.pp. 123–147.
- 67. Hittalmani S.A., Parco T.V., Mew T. W., Zeigler R.S., and Huang N. Fine mapping and DNA marker-assisted pyramiding of the three major genes for blast resistance in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet.2000.100, 1121–1128.
- 68. Balachiranjeevi C. H., Bhaskar N. S., Abhilash V., Akanksha S., Viraktamath B. C., Madhav M. S., et al. Marker assisted introgression of bacterial blight and blast resistance genes into DRR17B, an elite fine–grain type maintainer line of rice. Mol. Breed.2015. 35, 151.
- 69. Sundaram R. M., Vishnupriya M. R., Laha G. S., Rani S. N., Rao S. P., Balachandaran S. M., et al. Introduction of bacterial blight resistance into Triguna, a high yielding, mid-earlyduration rice variety. Biotechnol. J.2009. 4, 400–407. pmid:19253322