Bioimaging of alloantigen-stimulated regulatory T cells in rat vascularized composite allotransplantation

Hui-Yun Cheng; Sheri K. L. Tay; Chih-Jen Wen; Chih-Fan Lin; Aline Yen-Ling Wang; Ling-Yi Shih; Shiao-Chin Liu; Eiji Kobayashi; Cheng-Hung Lin; Fu-Chan Wei

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203624

Abstract

Background

Tipping the balance toward regulatory T cells (Tregs) through adoptive cell therapy has shown promise to induce transplantation tolerance. Although such strategy has been explored in many mice organ transplantation studies, less knowledge was available in rat systems. Furthermore, the behaviors of the transferred cells have not been well studied in real-time fashion.

Methods

Tregs from naïve LEW rats were purified in two steps with the autoMACS system. Immunosuppression potential of these cells was examined with mixed lymphocyte reaction. Following stimulation by the alloantigen in vitro, the purified Tregs were infused into the recipients of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). Secondary allogeneic skin grafting challenge was performed on the recipients with long-term survived VCA. Live optical imaging was performed to track luciferase-expressing Tregs following infusion to the VCA recipients. Expression of relevant molecules was studied by flow cytometry or quantitative RT-PCR.

Results

Rat Tregs were enriched following two-step cell sorting and showed immunosuppressive capacity. Upon infusion into the VCA recipients that have been treated with antilymphocyte serum and short-term Cyclosporin A, the antigen-stimulated Tregs significantly prolonged VCA survival and induced donor-specific tolerance. Tracking of the infused bioluminescent Tregs showed their specific homing to lymph nodes, and then to the VCAs. Following secondary skin grafting, Tregs specifically gathered at the donor-derived skin that was not rejected by the recipient. The in vivo migratory pattern coincided with the altered expression of cell surface molecules of CD62L, CD103, CD134, and CD278, following donor-antigen stimulation. Elevated expression of CCR4 and CCL22 in allograft may also participate in recruiting Tregs for maintenance of VCA survival and promoting donor-specific tolerance.

Conclusion

Sorted Tregs induced donor-specific tolerance to VCA in rats. Live cell tracking demonstrated that activated CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ Tregs targeted primarily to the lymph nodes and VCA. The Tregs migrated to the secondary grafted donor skin and contributed to the maintenance of donor-specific tolerance. These behaviors were associated with phenotypic changes induced by donor antigen stimulation. Increased expression of CCR4 and CCL22 in VCA skin may also be relevant.

Citation: Cheng H-Y, Tay SKL, Wen C-J, Lin C-F, Wang AY-L, Shih L-Y, et al. (2018) Bioimaging of alloantigen-stimulated regulatory T cells in rat vascularized composite allotransplantation. PLoS ONE 13(9): e0203624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624

Editor: Stanislaw Stepkowski, University of Toledo, UNITED STATES

Received: May 21, 2018; Accepted: August 23, 2018; Published: September 7, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work was supported by Chang Gung Medical Foundation: CMRPG3E1511, CMRPG3F2171 and National Science Council: NSC 102-2314-B-182-015, NSC 99-2314-B-182-016-MY2. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) refers to the reconstruction of a recipient’s anatomical unit containing multiple tissue types, such as hand/forearm or face, by a corresponding part procured from a deceased donor [1, 2]. Since 1998, over one hundred patients have benefited from various kinds of VCA with impressive functional and aesthetic outcomes in most cases. However, wider application of VCA has been hindered by the requirement for lifelong non-specific immunosuppressants and the accompanying toxicities [3, 4]. Pursuing a donor-specific tolerance that allows complete withdrawal of immunosuppressants without harming allograft survival has therefore been the ultimate pursuit of transplant immunology [5, 6].

Donor-specific tolerance to VCAs has been accomplished by various approaches, such as bone marrow or adipocyte-derived stem cell therapy [7–9]. Although the mechanisms are yet to be fully characterized, current knowledge from organ transplantation and VCA has demonstrated the importance of CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs) for the induction and maintenance of tolerance to allotransplants. Elevated level of Tregs was observed in peripheral blood and VCAs in the recipients who had developed tolerance [7, 9]. Tregs were also detected in long-term tolerized islet, skin, renal, and cardiac allografts, and have been suggested to participate in maintaining tolerance (review in [10]). The presence of Tregs in the allograft has been associated with stable allograft function [11] whilst the depletion of Tregs inhibited donor-specific hyporesponsiveness [12].

Considerable efforts have been targeted towards developing Tregs as a cellular therapeutic agent. Adoptive transfer of Tregs to transplantation recipients may increase the ratio of Tregs to effector T cells, and provide a regulatory environment to promote tolerance. This strategy has been proven successful in prolonging allograft survival in animal models of organ transplantation as well as VCA [13–15]. Clinical trials on Treg-based therapy have demonstrated safety and potential to induce tolerance [16–18], although detailed mechanistic knowledge remains to be revealed.

In the current study, we demonstrated that adoptive transfer of antigen-stimulated CD4⁺CD25⁺ Tregs can prolong survival as well as induce donor-specific tolerance of rat VCA. Real-time tracking of infused luciferase-expressing Tregs showed these cells migrated to lymph nodes followed by VCA after infusion, and stayed in draining lymph nodes and VCA for the long-term. Furthermore, secondary skin grafting induced the migration of Tregs toward allograft skin, suggesting active recruitment of Tregs by the alloantigen is critical for maintenance of donor-specific tolerance. These behaviors were associated with phenotypic changes induced by donor antigen stimulation. CCR4 and CCL22 may participate in maintenance of Treg population in allografts and tolerance.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male 8–12 weeks old donor Brown-Norway (BN, RT1n) and recipient Lewis rats (LEW, RT1l), representing a full MHC mismatch, were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center, Taiwan. Luciferase transgenic LEW rats were provided by Professor Eiji Kobayashi at Keio University in Japan and bred in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. All animals were housed in the animal facility of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, under pyrogen-free conditions, with temperature and lighting cycles controlled, and water and commercial rat chow freely available. When applicable, the animals were anaesthetized with isoflurane, and euthanasia with carbon dioxide. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and following the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols authorized by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, with the authorized protocol numbers of 2009121113, 2012121809, 2015032501, and 2016092601.

Rat model of vascularized composite allotransplantation

A previously described heterotopic hindlimb osteomyocutaneous VCA model was used [7]. Briefly, VCA harvest in the isoflurane-anaesthetized donor rat began with a longitudinal medial hindlimb incision from ankle to groin; this was extended to delineate the skin paddle (4 cm x 3 cm). Proximal to the ankle the tendons were cut, tibial vessels cauterized and the tibia osteotomized. The superficial epigastric vessels were ligated, thigh muscles sectioned and femur osteotomized. The flap was isolated on the femoral vessels below the inguinal ligament. The flap, including medullary cavities, was flushed with 10 ml heparinized saline, wrapped in saline gauze and placed on iced saline. The donor rat was euthanized with CO₂. In recipient rats, 3 cm inguinal and gluteal skin incisions were performed to prepare the recipient femoral vessels and delineate the recipient defect, respectively. The VCA was then inset and its circulation restored by 10/0 nylon microanastomoses. The inguinal incision was closed and the animal recovered. VCAs were then evaluated daily with an established semi-quantitative rejection grading system that ranges in severity from grade 0 to 4 as follows: grade 0, no rejection; grade 1, pink or slightly erythematous; grade 2, frank erythema; grade 3, erythema or purplish discoloration with blister formation or partial hair loss; and grade 4, dark purplish discoloration with blister formation and major hair loss. Rejection was defined when 80% of the VCA reached grade 4. Histological changes and lymphocyte infiltration were evaluated by microscopy after hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.

VCA study groups

A total of 29 heterotopic hindlimb osteomyocutaneous flaps were transplanted in 8–12 week-old male rats and divided into 4 groups. The recipient LEW rats received syngeneic transplants (group 1) or allogeneic transplants (groups 2–4) from BN rats on day 0. Groups 1 and 2 did not receive additional treatment. Groups 3 and 4 were treated with 0.5 ml ALS intraperitoneally on day -1 and +2, and daily subcutaneous CsA (16 mg/kg) from day 0 to 7. On POD 10, group 4 recipients were infused intravenously with LEW Tregs, which had been co-cultured with irradiated BN splenocytes for 72 hours.

Skin grafting

When the VCA survived for 120 days, secondary skin grafting was performed as described in detail previously [7]. Briefly, dorsal cutaneous defects were created in recipients with long-term surviving VCA for insetting BN, and SD-origin full-thickness tail skin grafts (2 cm x 1 cm). These were fixed with tie-overs for 7 days and successful grafts evaluated daily for rejection for another 60 days. Rejection was evidenced by erythema, edema, scaling of the skin, hair loss, epidermolysis, and desquamation; destruction of more than 80% of the graft defined rejection.

Isolation of CD4⁺CD25⁺ Treg cells

The spleen from a naïve LEW rat was harvested through a 1 cm left subcostal incision. It was then gently mashed in serum-free RPMI 1640 and filtered through a nylon mesh. Following lysis of erythrocytes with ACK buffer, cells were re-suspended in HBSS and counted. Sorting was performed using autoMACS Pro system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, splenocytes were re-suspended in MACS solution to a concentration of 10⁸ cells/ml and stained with antibodies for CD90.1, CD8a, CD11b/c, CD45RA and NKR-P1A (all were purchased from BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) for 15 minutes at 4 °C, washed and followed by incubation with anti-IgG microbeads for 15 min at 4 °C. The CD4⁺ lymphocytes were collected through negative selection with the autoMACS Pro running program Possel. The CD4⁺-enriched fraction was then incubated with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD25 (BD Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). The cells were then mixed well with MultiSort stop reagent and incubated with 20ul Anti-PE MicroBeads per 10⁷ cells for 15min at 4 °C. Following washing, CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells were collected with the autoMACS Pro by positive selection using program Possel. Isolated CD4⁺CD25⁺ Tregs were incubated with BN antigen-presenting cells at 1:1 ratio for 3 days at 37 °C in the presence of rat IL-2 (Peprotech, Rehovot, Israel). The cells were collected, washed and re-suspended in PBS before infusion. Due to the variation derived from sorting efficiency and cell culture, the total cell numbers for infusion were hard to be fixed, and were between 7x10⁵-2x10⁶.

Flow cytometric analysis of sorted Treg cells

Expression of CD62L, CD103, CD134 and CD278 of sorted cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Briefly, CD4⁺CD25⁺-enriched cells right after sorting or after donor antigen stimulation for 3 days were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-CD62L (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK), APC-conjugated anti-CD103 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), FITC-conjugated anti-CD134 (AbD Serotec), or PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD278 (Biolegend) in addition to anti-CD4 (APC or PE-Cy7 conjugated) (BD Pharmigen). Followed by treatment with permeabilization kit (eBioscience) at 4 °C for 18 hr and staining with PerCP-conjugated anti-FoxP3 (eBioscience), the cells were analyzed by FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For analysis, live cells excluding debris and dead cells were gated first followed by gating on the FoxP3-expressing cell. Expression level of CD62L, CD103, CD134 and CD278 was analyzed on FoxP3-expressing cells specifically.

Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR)

Rat spleens were harvested in sterile conditions. After erythrocyte lysis, splenocytes were isolated and re-suspended in complete RPMI-1640 media. In one-way MLR, LEW splenocytes (1x10⁵ cells/well) were co-cultured with either 2 μg/ml Concanavalin A (Con A, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA) or allogeneic BN stimulator splenocytes that had been irradiated (2000 cGy; Gammacell^® 1000 Elite Nordion International, Ottawa, ON, Canada). Tregs were added in 1:1, 1:0.5, 1:0.2, 1:0.1 ratios to responder cells according to experimental design as described. Cells were cultured in quadruplicate in 96-well U-shaped plates for 4 days then pulsed with 1 μCi/well ³H-thymidine (³H-TdR, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for 16 h and harvested over glass fiber filters. Thymidine uptake was quantified on a microplate scintillation and luminescence counter (Packard NXT, Meriden, CT, USA). Thymidine incorporation into spontaneously proliferating responders (in media alone) was the control and set as 1. Ratios of thymidine incorporation under all other conditions with respect to the control were acquired, providing stimulation indices (SI).

In vivo dynamic cell tracking with IVIS Spectrum

CD4⁺CD25⁺ Tregs were isolated from luciferase transgenic LEW rats as described earlier. Following infusion to VCA recipients, luciferase-expressing Tregs were tracked in vivo with IVIS Spectrum (Xenogen, Alemeda, CA, USA) at pre-designated intervals till sacrifice.

RNA preparation and quantitative RT-PCR

Skin tissue was preserved in RNAlater (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and minced under liquid nitrogen followed by dounce homogenization in TRIZOL^® Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of the collected DNA is measured by OD₂₆₀. Only the RNA with a OD₂₆₀/ OD₂₈₀ ratio higher than 1.8 proceeded to be studied further. Each RT-PCR is derived from 10 ng of total RNA isolated. For reverse transcription, 10 ng of total RNA was incubated with dNTP mix, primer and Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) under 16°C for 30 min, followed by 42°C for 30 min and 85°C for 5 min in a total volume of 15 ul. The PCR reaction was done in a total reaction volume of 20 μl, containing 100 ng cDNA, 10 pmol each of the forward and reverse primers, 10 μl SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The mixture was preheated at 95 °C for 10 minutes and then cycled for 40 times at 95 °C for 1 minute for denaturation and 60 °C for 1 minute for annealing and elongation in a ABI StepOne system (Applied Biosystems). The progress of the fluorescence generation by chelation of SYBR Green to the double-strand PCR product was continuously monitored. The threshold cycle (Ct) for each reaction was acquired for quantitation with GAPDH serving as the internal control.

Statistics

Data were expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Results of MLR were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-HSD for post hoc pairwise comparison. Results of flow cytometry were analyzed by Student’s t test. Median VCA survivals with standard errors were acquired by the product limit method of Kaplan-Meier and presented by survival curves. A probability value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS software.

Results and discussion

Immunosuppressive Tregs can be isolated with MACS system

We isolated Rat Tregs from the spleens of LEW rats in two steps with magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) technology. The first step was negative selection to deplete CD90.1⁺, CD8⁺, CD11b/c⁺, CD45RA⁺ and NKR-P1A⁺ cells and enrich CD4-expressing cells. Following positive selection of CD4⁺ cells with CD25 expression, the purity of CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells increased from 4.68% to 79.2% on average. The percentage of FoxP3-expressing cells increased from 5.05% to 69.2% (Fig 1). We also tried to isolate CD4-expressing cells through positive selection at the first step. However, the yield of CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells was very low (data not shown). It could be possibly due to the interference of CD25 antibody binding by the CD4 antibody-bead complex bound to the cells at the first sorting step.

Download:

Fig 1. Sorting with autoMACS Pro enhanced the purity of CD4⁺CD25⁺FoxP3⁺ Tregs.

A. Representative flow cytometric diagrams from splenocytes before (left column) and after (right column) sorting. The percentages of cells expressing FoxP3 (upper panel) and CD4⁺CD25⁺ in lymphocytes are shown. B. Group data on the purity of CD4⁺CD25⁺ and FoxP3⁺ cells in lymphocytes before and after sorting.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g001

The immunosuppressive functions of these CD4⁺CD25⁺-enriched cells were evaluated by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), in which LEW splenocytes served as responders and irradiated BN splenocytes as allogeneic stimulators. Compared to spontaneous proliferation where LEW splenocytes were cultured in media alone, a significant increase in LEW splenocyte proliferation was observed when they were co-cultured with stimulators or mitogenic Con A. Adding sorted CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells suppressed proliferation of the responder in a dose-related manner against BN antigen stimulation. When added at an equivalent cell ratio (ie. LEW: Treg ratio of 1:1), BN antigen-induced proliferation of responder cells was almost completely suppressed to the level of spontaneous proliferation. Less suppression in responder proliferation was detected when fewer Tregs were added (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Sorted Tregs suppressed BN splenocyte-induced proliferation of LEW splenocytes in one-way MLR.

Each reaction contained 1x10⁵ LEW splenocytes. Mitogen Con A, BN splenocytes or sorted LEW Tregs were added in reaction as indicated. Cellular proliferations were expressed as mean stimulation indices (SIs) with respect to spontaneous proliferation of four experimental repeats with standard deviation. The asterisk denotes statistical significance acquired with ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s test with the probability less than 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g002

Adoptive transfer of donor antigen-stimulated Tregs prolonged survival of vascularized composite allotransplants

Tregs were known to exert a suppressive function through secretion of inhibitory cytokines, cytolysis and metabolic interruption of effector cells, as well as modulation of dendritic cells [19]. The adoptive transfer of Tregs has been shown to prolong allograft survival in several different systems. Furthermore, Tregs with donor-specificity were shown to have better suppressive function against donor antigen-elicited alloresponse both in vitro and in vivo [20]. Therefore, we stimulated the isolated Tregs with donor antigens, followed by adoptive transfer to the VCA recipients, and then evaluated the VCA survival.

All syngeneic transplants survived the whole observation period of 150 days without signs of rejection (n = 6), whereas group 2 (rejection control, n = 5) animals rejected VCAs between days 7 and 10. Groups 3 (n = 7) and 4 (n = 11) showed significant prolongation of VCA survival compared to group 2. Sole treatment with immunosuppressants (ALS and CsA) moderately prolonged graft survival to around POD 30. Infused Tregs significantly increased the ratio of VCA recipients that had long-term VCA survival (to POD 150) to 45%, with group median survival time of 87 days (Fig 3).

Download:

Fig 3. Infusion of BN antigen-stimulated Tregs significantly prolonged VCA survival.

A. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for control and experimental groups. B. Outlook of VCA after long-term survival at POD 154.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g003

In vivo cell tracking demonstrated that adoptive transferred Tregs migrated to and homed towards lymph nodes and allograft and persisted at these sites long term

The behaviors of the infused cells in vivo were tracked by bioluminescence imaging with Tregs isolated from LEW rats with luciferase transgene expression [21] in the presence of luciferin. This approach also allowed us to specifically monitor the behaviors of the infused cells. As shown in Fig 4, infused Tregs migrated to the inguinal lymph node at as early as 4 days after infusion (PID 4, equals to POD 14), and the axillary lymph nodes at PID 6 in the allograft recipients. The signal remained for long term, although that of the axillary lymph nodes lessened after long-term tracking. Furthermore, intense bioluminescence was observed at the VCA from PID 17 and this level was stable and persisted for as long as the allograft survived (Fig 4, upper panel). The bioluminescence signals were confirmed to be coming from lymph nodes and allograft following dissection (Fig 4, lower panel). On the other hand, no clear migration pattern was observed in the recipient of syngeneic graft infused with the same number of luciferase-expressing Tregs. The luciferase signal faded away after two weeks (Fig 4, middle panel). It suggests that the allogeneic environment was critical for maintaining the infused Treg population, similar to the finding reported in a mice graft versus host disease model [22].

Download:

Fig 4. Bioluminescent imaging of luciferase-expressing Tregs following infusion.

The upper and middle panels show the traces of infused Tregs in recipients of allograft (upper) and syngeneic graft (middle). The bottom panel demonstrates the ex vivo validation following dissection of the allogeneic recipient at PID 294. Photo frames of the tissues and the dissection sites were color-matched. A. ventral view. B. transplanted graft. In the recipient of allogeneic graft, infused Tregs migrated to and stayed at the lymph node(s) from PID 4, whereas they appeared at the allograft from PID 6 (shown with red arrow) and intensified by PID 20. The signal was maintained throughout the whole observation period. In comparison, no clear trace of infused Tregs was observed in syngeneic recipients after two weeks. PID: post Treg-infusion day. PID 1 = POD 11. (C). Rejected and tolerant VCAs were stained with FoxP3 antibody followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. FoxP3-expressing cells were characterized by brown staining, whereas blue staining were derived from cell nuclei. Scale bar represents 100μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g004

Recipients with long-term survived VCAs were challenged with secondary skin grafting derived from the original donor strain BN or a third-party strain SD. The SD skin was rejected and a scar following secondary healing was observed. In comparison, the BN skin survived well, suggesting the donor-specific tolerance was established. Interestingly, the luciferase-expressing Tregs infused early after VCA were found to migrate and concentrate specifically to the BN skin, whilst there was no bioluminescence detected in the third-party graft (Fig 5). Consistent with the finding, immunohistochemical study of FoxP3 also showed that Tregs were concentrated in the tolerant VCA and were absent in the rejected skin (Fig 4C).

Download:

Fig 5. Bioluminescent imaging of luciferase-expressing Tregs following secondary skin grafting.

Blank (without luciferin) and bioluminescence images (with luciferin) of the skin grafts derived from the donor strain (BN) or the third-party strain (SD) were taken at 60 days after skin grafting.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g005

However, Zhang et al previously demonstrated in a mouse islet allotransplantation model that infused Tregs first migrated to the allograft, become activated, and subsequently migrated to draining lymph nodes [23]. Later studies identified that T-bet and lymphotoxin beta receptors participate in afferent lymphatic migration in this system [24, 25]. The authors suggested such migration pattern was critical for optimal suppression of alloimmune response [23]. Nevertheless, this study was performed in a cross-sectional fashion with microscopic observation on samples collected at designated time points and then the sequence of events was reconstructed. In contrast, real-time in vivo imaging was performed in our study, and the behavior of Tregs was observed longitudinally in live animals. Our observation showed a different migration pattern with the Tregs homing first to the lymph nodes before migrating to the allograft. One factor that may explain the observed discrepancy is the timing of the Treg infusion. Zhang et al transferred Tregs at the time of transplantation, whereas we conditioned the recipients with ALS and short-term cyclosporine for one week till three days prior to Treg infusion. At the time when Tregs enter the recipient system, donor antigens may have already been processed to prime recipient T cells at the lymph nodes. Thus the infused Tregs preferentially migrated to the lymph nodes to prevent T cell priming and expansion of Teffs which specifically reacted to donor antigens. Our finding is consistent with the observation by Nguyen et al with in vivo cell tracking that infused Tregs migrated to LNs and proliferated prior to moving to peripheral tissues. Their imaging study also demonstrated that proliferation of conventional CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells was suppressed in the presence of Tregs [22].

Donor antigen stimulation induced phenotypic changes on isolated Tregs

Since the donor antigen stimulated Tregs significantly prolonged VCA survival and induced donor-specific tolerance, how donor antigen stimulation affected the cell surface expression of CD62L, CD103, CD134, and CD278 on sorted Tregs were studied in vitro by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig 6, expression of the surface molecules CD62L, CD103, and CD134 on FoxP3⁺-expressing Tregs were significantly increased. By contrast, slightly lower levels of CD278 were observed on alloantigen-stimulated Tregs with statistical significance.

Download:

Fig 6. In vitro stimulation with donor (BN) antigens induced phenotypic changes of sorted Tregs.

BN antigen stimulation induced significantly higher expression of CD62L, CD103, and CD134 on sorted Tregs. By contrast, lower expression of CD278 was observed. The asterisk denotes statistical significance acquired with Student’s t test with the probability less than 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g006

Tregs have been demonstrated to be versatile and consistently respond to the immune environment with subtle modifications in phenotype and function in the periphery [26]. In line with this, we found that donor antigen stimulation increased the surface expressions of CD62L and CD103. CD62L, also known as L-selectin, has been well studied as a homing signal for lymph nodes [27]. Furthermore, CD62L⁺ T cells were more responsive to alloantigen stimulation compared to the CD62L^- counterparts [28]. Our data of enhanced expression of the LN-homing CD62L on Tregs by donor antigen stimulation, further supported the preferential LN-targeting behavior of the infused Tregs that we observed (Fig 4). CD103, encoding the α_E chain of α_Eβ₇ integrin, was shown to participate in the retention of Tregs at infection sites [29], as well as regulation of the suppressive function of Tregs [30]. In a murine GVHD model, CD103⁺ Tregs were shown to induce apoptosis of Teff and B cells at the target site [31].

CD134 (OX40), and CD278 (ICOS) are both co-stimulatory molecules for T cells [32, 33]. Consistent with our findings, Miura reported that alloantigen stimulation significantly upregulated expression of CD134 and FoxP3 on CD4 lymphocytes [34]. CD134 was shown to regulate Treg function since administration of CD134 antibody abrogated suppression mediated by Tregs in a GvHD model, in addition to its participation in development and homeostasis of Tregs [35]. Expression of CD278 was shown to define subsets of Tregs with differences in cytokine production [36], as well as viability and suppressive capability [37]. In the current study, donor antigen stimulation induced a small but significant decrease in CD278 expression on Tregs, suggesting a less homogeneous Treg population was generated with antigen stimulation. Our data suggest the alloantigen-specific Tregs may induce donor-specific tolerance through regulation of surface molecule expression. These Tregs participate in maintaining VCA survival through specific migration to lymph nodes then to the allografts, potentially inducing apoptosis of Teff, interfering with T cell infiltration, or preventing the generation of alloreactive memory CD8⁺ T cells locally [38, 39].

Specific chemokines helped to recruit Tregs to the allografts

Recruitment of Tregs may be regulated by the interaction between chemokine and chemokine receptors as well [40]. Since the infused Tregs migrated to and then stayed at the tolerant VCA for extended period of time, gene expression of various chemokine receptors that may participate in lymphocyte recruitment in VCA was evaluated. We performed quantitative RT-PCR and compared the expression levels of CCR1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and CXCR3, 4, 5 on naïve (BN skins collected before surgery), tolerant and rejection VCA skins (Fig 7A). All chemokine receptors were upregulated in both tolerant and rejection skins. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons between tolerant and rejected VCA skins showed that CCR4 expressed significantly higher level in tolerant skins, whereas CCR1, 2, and 7 showed opposite expression pattern. The potential CCR4 ligands, CCL17 and CCL22, were then examined, and the data showed that CCL22 was upregulated significantly in tolerant VCA skins although CCL17 was not differentially expressed between the tolerant versus rejection skins (Fig 7B). It is thus reasonable to hypothesize that CCR4-CCL22 axis participates in recruiting/maintaining Tregs at the VCA skins to suppress alloimmune response locally. Our data along with that reported by Lee et al showing the requirement of CCR4 and CCL22 expression for recruitment of Tregs to the allogeneic cardiac transplant [41], support the significance of CCR4-CCL22 and Tregs in maintenance of allograft survival at both solid organ and composite tissue allotransplantation.

Download:

Fig 7. Higher expression levels of CCR4 and CCL22 in tolerant VCA skin than the rejected ones.

A. group data showed relative expression levels of CCR1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and CXCR3, 4, 5 on naïve, tolerant, and rejection VCA skins. Only CCR4 expressed significantly higher level in tolerant versus rejected VCA skin. B. group data showed the CCR4 ligand CCL22 expressed significantly higher level in tolerant versus rejected VCA skin. Transcripts were RT-PCR amplified with gene-specific primers incorporating SyBr Green. The Ct (threshold cycle) was acquired and normalized to that of GAPDH. The average level of the naïve group was set as 1. The average with standard deviation of each group is shown. Asterisk denotes statistical significance between tolerant and rejection groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203624.g007

Since all other chemokine receptors were upregulated in tolerant skin compared to the naïve ones, their roles in recruiting Tregs for tolerance induction are not clear. Further analysis of the evolution of chemokine receptor panel on Tregs following donor antigen stimulation, or during retention at lymph nodes, may help to further delineate the fine molecular cues regulating Treg migratory behaviors.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that rat CD4⁺CD25⁺ Tregs could be enriched with a two-step MACS protocol. Following stimulation by donor antigen, the sorted Tregs went through phenotypic changes in vitro and promoted allograft survival in vivo. Bioluminesence tracking of the infused Tregs in the wild type VCA recipient showed that these cells displayed a specific homing to lymph nodes and to the VCA. The signal sustained for long term in the recipient that developed donor-specific tolerance. The infused Tregs specifically migrated to donor rather than the third-party skin following a secondary antigen challenge by skin grafting, suggestive of an active and protective role of Tregs in long-term maintenance of VCA survival.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging and Translation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, for the IVIS Spectrum.

References

1. Murphy BD, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Vascularized composite allotransplantation: an update on medical and surgical progress and remaining challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(11): 1449–1455. pmid:23867239
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Siemionow M, Gharb BB, Rampazzo A. Successes and lessons learned after more than a decade of upper extremity and face transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013;18(6): 633–639. pmid:24126806
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Schneeberger S, Landin L, Jableki J, Butler P, Hoehnke C, Brandacher G, et al. Achievements and challenges in composite tissue allotransplantation. Transpl Int. 2011;24(8): 760–769. pmid:21554424
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Siemionow M. Impact of reconstructive transplantation on the future of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39(4): 425–434. pmid:23036293
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Page EK, Dar WA, Knechtle SJ. Tolerogenic therapies in transplantation. Front Immunol. 2012;3: 198. pmid:22826708
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Leonard DA, Kurtz JM, Cetrulo CL, Jr. Achieving immune tolerance in hand and face transplantation: a realistic prospect? Immunotherapy. 2014;6(5): 499–502. pmid:24896618
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Cheng HY, Ghetu N, Huang WC, Wang YL, Wallace CG, Wen CJ, et al. Syngeneic adipose-derived stem cells with short-term immunosuppression induce vascularized composite allotransplantation tolerance in rats. Cytotherapy. 2014;16(3): 369–380. pmid:24119648
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Kuo YR, Chen CC, Goto S, Lee IT, Huang CW, Tsai CC, et al. Modulation of immune response and T-cell regulation by donor adipose-derived stem cells in a rodent hind-limb allotransplant model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6): 661e–672e. pmid:22094768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kuo YR, Chen CC, Shih HS, Goto S, Huang CW, Wang CT, et al. Prolongation of composite tissue allotransplant survival by treatment with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells is correlated with T-cell regulation in a swine hind-limb model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2): 569–579. pmid:21285761
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Burrell BE, Nakayama Y, Xu J, Brinkman CC, Bromberg JS. Regulatory T cell induction, migration, and function in transplantation. Journal of Immunology. 2012;189(10): 4705–4711.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Alvarez CM, Opelz G, Garcia LF, Susal C. Expression of regulatory T-cell-related molecule genes and clinical outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2009;87(6): 857–863. pmid:19300189
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Bestard O, Cruzado JM, Mestre M, Caldes A, Bas J, Carrera M, et al. Achieving donor-specific hyporesponsiveness is associated with FOXP3+ regulatory T cell recruitment in human renal allograft infiltrates. J Immunol. 2007;179(7): 4901–4909. pmid:17878390
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Lin JY, Tsai FC, Wallace CG, Huang WC, Wei FC, Liao SK. Combined treatment with regulatory T cells and vascularized bone marrow transplantation creates mixed chimerism and induces donor-specific tolerance to vascularized composite allografts without cytoreductive conditioning. J Surg Res. 2012;178(2): 974–981. pmid:22819314
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Pu LY, Wang XH, Zhang F, Li XC, Yao AH, Yu Y, et al. Adoptive transfusion of ex vivo donor alloantigen-stimulated CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells ameliorates rejection of DA-to-Lewis rat liver transplantation. Surgery. 2007;142(1): 67–73.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Xia G, He J, Leventhal JR. Ex vivo-expanded natural CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells synergize with host T-cell depletion to promote long-term survival of allografts. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(2): 298–306. pmid:18190656
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Edozie FC, Nova-Lamperti EA, Povoleri GA, Scotta C, John S, Lombardi G, et al. Regulatory T-Cell Therapy in the Induction of Transplant Tolerance: The Issue of Subpopulations. Transplantation. 2014;98(4): 370–379. pmid:24933458
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Todo S, Yamashita K, Goto R, Zaitsu M, Nagatsu A, Oura T, et al. A Pilot Study of Operational Tolerance with a Regulatory T Cell-Based Cell Therapy in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Hepatology. 2016; 64(2):632–43. pmid:26773713
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Bluestone JA, Buckner JH, Fitch M, Gitelman SE, Gupta S, Hellerstein MK, et al. Type 1 diabetes immunotherapy using polyclonal regulatory T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(315): 315ra189.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Vignali DA, Collison LW, Workman CJ. How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(7): 523–532. pmid:18566595
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Sanchez-Fueyo A, Sandner S, Habicht A, Mariat C, Kenny J, Degauque N, et al. Specificity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell function in alloimmunity. J Immunol. 2006;176(1): 329–334. pmid:16365425
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Hakamata Y, Murakami T, Kobayashi E. "Firefly rats" as an organ/cellular source for long-term in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Transplantation. 2006;81(8): 1179–1184.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Nguyen VH, Zeiser R, Dasilva DL, Chang DS, Beilhack A, Contag CH, et al. In vivo dynamics of regulatory T-cell trafficking and survival predict effective strategies to control graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplantation. Blood. 2007;109(6): 2649–2656. pmid:17095616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Zhang N, Schroppel B, Lal G, Jakubzick C, Mao X, Chen D, et al. Regulatory T cells sequentially migrate from inflamed tissues to draining lymph nodes to suppress the alloimmune response. Immunity. 2009;30(3): 458–469. pmid:19303390
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Brinkman CC, Iwami D, Hritzo MK, Xiong Y, Ahmad S, Simon T, et al. Treg engage lymphotoxin beta receptor for afferent lymphatic transendothelial migration. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 12021. pmid:27323847
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Xiong Y, Ahmad S, Iwami D, Brinkman CC, Bromberg JS. T-bet Regulates Natural Regulatory T Cell Afferent Lymphatic Migration and Suppressive Function. J Immunol. 2016;196(6): 2526–2540. pmid:26880765
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Campbell DJ, Koch MA. Phenotypical and functional specialization of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(2): 119–130. pmid:21267013
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Ermann J, Hoffmann P, Edinger M, Dutt S, Blankenberg FG, Higgins JP, et al. Only the CD62L+ subpopulation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells protects from lethal acute GVHD. Blood. 2005;105(5): 2220–2226. pmid:15546950
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Foster AE, Marangolo M, Sartor MM, Alexander SI, Hu M, Bradstock KF, et al. Human CD62L- memory T cells are less responsive to alloantigen stimulation than CD62L+ naive T cells: potential for adoptive immunotherapy and allodepletion. Blood. 2004;104(8): 2403–2409. pmid:15231569
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Suffia I, Reckling SK, Salay G, Belkaid Y. A role for CD103 in the retention of CD4+CD25+ Treg and control of Leishmania major infection. J Immunol. 2005;174(9): 5444–5455. pmid:15845457
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Braun A, Dewert N, Brunnert F, Schnabel V, Hardenberg JH, Richter B, et al. Integrin alphaE(CD103) Is Involved in Regulatory T-Cell Function in Allergic Contact Hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(12): 2982–2991. pmid:26203637
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Zhao D, Zhang C, Yi T, Lin CL, Todorov I, Kandeel F, et al. In vivo-activated CD103+CD4+ regulatory T cells ameliorate ongoing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2008;112(5): 2129–2138. pmid:18550852
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Hutloff A, Dittrich AM, Beier KC, Eljaschewitsch B, Kraft R, Anagnostopoulos I, et al. ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature. 1999;397(6716): 263–266. pmid:9930702
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Roos A, Schilder-Tol EJ, Weening JJ, Aten J. Strong expression of CD134 (OX40), a member of the TNF receptor family, in a T helper 2-type cytokine environment. J Leukoc Biol. 1998;64(4): 503–510. pmid:9766631
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Miura Y, Thoburn CJ, Bright EC, Arai S, Hess AD. Regulation of OX40 gene expression in graft-versus-host disease. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(1): 57–61. pmid:15808546
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Qu Y, Zhao Y. Regulatory CD4(+)CD25(+) T-cells are controlled by multiple pathways at multiple levels. Int Rev Immunol. 2007;26(3–4): 145–160.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Ito T, Hanabuchi S, Wang YH, Park WR, Arima K, Bover L, et al. Two functional subsets of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in human thymus and periphery. Immunity. 2008;28(6): 870–880. pmid:18513999
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Chen Y, Shen S, Gorentla BK, Gao J, Zhong XP. Murine regulatory T cells contain hyperproliferative and death-prone subsets with differential ICOS expression. J Immunol. 2012;188(4): 1698–1707. pmid:22231701
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Carvalho-Gaspar M, Jones ND, Luo S, Martin L, Brook MO, Wood KJ. Location and time-dependent control of rejection by regulatory T cells culminates in a failure to generate memory T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180(10): 6640–6648. pmid:18453583
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Chauhan SK, Saban DR, Dohlman TH, Dana R. CCL-21 conditioned regulatory T cells induce allotolerance through enhanced homing to lymphoid tissue. J Immunol. 2014;192(2): 817–823. pmid:24337379
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Ding Y, Xu J, Bromberg JS. Regulatory T cell migration during an immune response. Trends Immunol. 2012;33(4): 174–180. pmid:22305714
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Lee I, Wang L, Wells AD, Dorf ME, Ozkaynak E, Hancock WW. Recruitment of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells mediating allograft tolerance depends on the CCR4 chemokine receptor. J Exp Med. 2005;201(7): 1037–1044. pmid:15809349
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Murphy BD, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Vascularized composite allotransplantation: an update on medical and surgical progress and remaining challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(11): 1449–1455. pmid:23867239
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Siemionow M, Gharb BB, Rampazzo A. Successes and lessons learned after more than a decade of upper extremity and face transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013;18(6): 633–639. pmid:24126806
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Schneeberger S, Landin L, Jableki J, Butler P, Hoehnke C, Brandacher G, et al. Achievements and challenges in composite tissue allotransplantation. Transpl Int. 2011;24(8): 760–769. pmid:21554424
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Siemionow M. Impact of reconstructive transplantation on the future of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39(4): 425–434. pmid:23036293
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Page EK, Dar WA, Knechtle SJ. Tolerogenic therapies in transplantation. Front Immunol. 2012;3: 198. pmid:22826708
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Leonard DA, Kurtz JM, Cetrulo CL, Jr. Achieving immune tolerance in hand and face transplantation: a realistic prospect? Immunotherapy. 2014;6(5): 499–502. pmid:24896618
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Cheng HY, Ghetu N, Huang WC, Wang YL, Wallace CG, Wen CJ, et al. Syngeneic adipose-derived stem cells with short-term immunosuppression induce vascularized composite allotransplantation tolerance in rats. Cytotherapy. 2014;16(3): 369–380. pmid:24119648
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Kuo YR, Chen CC, Goto S, Lee IT, Huang CW, Tsai CC, et al. Modulation of immune response and T-cell regulation by donor adipose-derived stem cells in a rodent hind-limb allotransplant model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6): 661e–672e. pmid:22094768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kuo YR, Chen CC, Shih HS, Goto S, Huang CW, Wang CT, et al. Prolongation of composite tissue allotransplant survival by treatment with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells is correlated with T-cell regulation in a swine hind-limb model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2): 569–579. pmid:21285761
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Burrell BE, Nakayama Y, Xu J, Brinkman CC, Bromberg JS. Regulatory T cell induction, migration, and function in transplantation. Journal of Immunology. 2012;189(10): 4705–4711.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Alvarez CM, Opelz G, Garcia LF, Susal C. Expression of regulatory T-cell-related molecule genes and clinical outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2009;87(6): 857–863. pmid:19300189
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Bestard O, Cruzado JM, Mestre M, Caldes A, Bas J, Carrera M, et al. Achieving donor-specific hyporesponsiveness is associated with FOXP3+ regulatory T cell recruitment in human renal allograft infiltrates. J Immunol. 2007;179(7): 4901–4909. pmid:17878390
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Lin JY, Tsai FC, Wallace CG, Huang WC, Wei FC, Liao SK. Combined treatment with regulatory T cells and vascularized bone marrow transplantation creates mixed chimerism and induces donor-specific tolerance to vascularized composite allografts without cytoreductive conditioning. J Surg Res. 2012;178(2): 974–981. pmid:22819314
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Pu LY, Wang XH, Zhang F, Li XC, Yao AH, Yu Y, et al. Adoptive transfusion of ex vivo donor alloantigen-stimulated CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells ameliorates rejection of DA-to-Lewis rat liver transplantation. Surgery. 2007;142(1): 67–73.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Xia G, He J, Leventhal JR. Ex vivo-expanded natural CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells synergize with host T-cell depletion to promote long-term survival of allografts. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(2): 298–306. pmid:18190656
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Edozie FC, Nova-Lamperti EA, Povoleri GA, Scotta C, John S, Lombardi G, et al. Regulatory T-Cell Therapy in the Induction of Transplant Tolerance: The Issue of Subpopulations. Transplantation. 2014;98(4): 370–379. pmid:24933458
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Todo S, Yamashita K, Goto R, Zaitsu M, Nagatsu A, Oura T, et al. A Pilot Study of Operational Tolerance with a Regulatory T Cell-Based Cell Therapy in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Hepatology. 2016; 64(2):632–43. pmid:26773713
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Bluestone JA, Buckner JH, Fitch M, Gitelman SE, Gupta S, Hellerstein MK, et al. Type 1 diabetes immunotherapy using polyclonal regulatory T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(315): 315ra189.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Vignali DA, Collison LW, Workman CJ. How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(7): 523–532. pmid:18566595
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Sanchez-Fueyo A, Sandner S, Habicht A, Mariat C, Kenny J, Degauque N, et al. Specificity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell function in alloimmunity. J Immunol. 2006;176(1): 329–334. pmid:16365425
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Hakamata Y, Murakami T, Kobayashi E. "Firefly rats" as an organ/cellular source for long-term in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Transplantation. 2006;81(8): 1179–1184.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Nguyen VH, Zeiser R, Dasilva DL, Chang DS, Beilhack A, Contag CH, et al. In vivo dynamics of regulatory T-cell trafficking and survival predict effective strategies to control graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplantation. Blood. 2007;109(6): 2649–2656. pmid:17095616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Zhang N, Schroppel B, Lal G, Jakubzick C, Mao X, Chen D, et al. Regulatory T cells sequentially migrate from inflamed tissues to draining lymph nodes to suppress the alloimmune response. Immunity. 2009;30(3): 458–469. pmid:19303390
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Brinkman CC, Iwami D, Hritzo MK, Xiong Y, Ahmad S, Simon T, et al. Treg engage lymphotoxin beta receptor for afferent lymphatic transendothelial migration. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 12021. pmid:27323847
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Xiong Y, Ahmad S, Iwami D, Brinkman CC, Bromberg JS. T-bet Regulates Natural Regulatory T Cell Afferent Lymphatic Migration and Suppressive Function. J Immunol. 2016;196(6): 2526–2540. pmid:26880765
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Campbell DJ, Koch MA. Phenotypical and functional specialization of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(2): 119–130. pmid:21267013
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ermann J, Hoffmann P, Edinger M, Dutt S, Blankenberg FG, Higgins JP, et al. Only the CD62L+ subpopulation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells protects from lethal acute GVHD. Blood. 2005;105(5): 2220–2226. pmid:15546950
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Foster AE, Marangolo M, Sartor MM, Alexander SI, Hu M, Bradstock KF, et al. Human CD62L- memory T cells are less responsive to alloantigen stimulation than CD62L+ naive T cells: potential for adoptive immunotherapy and allodepletion. Blood. 2004;104(8): 2403–2409. pmid:15231569
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Suffia I, Reckling SK, Salay G, Belkaid Y. A role for CD103 in the retention of CD4+CD25+ Treg and control of Leishmania major infection. J Immunol. 2005;174(9): 5444–5455. pmid:15845457
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Braun A, Dewert N, Brunnert F, Schnabel V, Hardenberg JH, Richter B, et al. Integrin alphaE(CD103) Is Involved in Regulatory T-Cell Function in Allergic Contact Hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(12): 2982–2991. pmid:26203637
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Zhao D, Zhang C, Yi T, Lin CL, Todorov I, Kandeel F, et al. In vivo-activated CD103+CD4+ regulatory T cells ameliorate ongoing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2008;112(5): 2129–2138. pmid:18550852
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hutloff A, Dittrich AM, Beier KC, Eljaschewitsch B, Kraft R, Anagnostopoulos I, et al. ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature. 1999;397(6716): 263–266. pmid:9930702
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Roos A, Schilder-Tol EJ, Weening JJ, Aten J. Strong expression of CD134 (OX40), a member of the TNF receptor family, in a T helper 2-type cytokine environment. J Leukoc Biol. 1998;64(4): 503–510. pmid:9766631
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Miura Y, Thoburn CJ, Bright EC, Arai S, Hess AD. Regulation of OX40 gene expression in graft-versus-host disease. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(1): 57–61. pmid:15808546
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Qu Y, Zhao Y. Regulatory CD4(+)CD25(+) T-cells are controlled by multiple pathways at multiple levels. Int Rev Immunol. 2007;26(3–4): 145–160.
View Article
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Ito T, Hanabuchi S, Wang YH, Park WR, Arima K, Bover L, et al. Two functional subsets of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in human thymus and periphery. Immunity. 2008;28(6): 870–880. pmid:18513999
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Chen Y, Shen S, Gorentla BK, Gao J, Zhong XP. Murine regulatory T cells contain hyperproliferative and death-prone subsets with differential ICOS expression. J Immunol. 2012;188(4): 1698–1707. pmid:22231701
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Carvalho-Gaspar M, Jones ND, Luo S, Martin L, Brook MO, Wood KJ. Location and time-dependent control of rejection by regulatory T cells culminates in a failure to generate memory T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180(10): 6640–6648. pmid:18453583
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Chauhan SK, Saban DR, Dohlman TH, Dana R. CCL-21 conditioned regulatory T cells induce allotolerance through enhanced homing to lymphoid tissue. J Immunol. 2014;192(2): 817–823. pmid:24337379
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Ding Y, Xu J, Bromberg JS. Regulatory T cell migration during an immune response. Trends Immunol. 2012;33(4): 174–180. pmid:22305714
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Lee I, Wang L, Wells AD, Dorf ME, Ozkaynak E, Hancock WW. Recruitment of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells mediating allograft tolerance depends on the CCR4 chemokine receptor. J Exp Med. 2005;201(7): 1037–1044. pmid:15809349
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and methods

Animals

Rat model of vascularized composite allotransplantation

VCA study groups

Skin grafting

Isolation of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells

Flow cytometric analysis of sorted Treg cells

Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR)

In vivo dynamic cell tracking with IVIS Spectrum

RNA preparation and quantitative RT-PCR

Statistics

Results and discussion

Immunosuppressive Tregs can be isolated with MACS system

Adoptive transfer of donor antigen-stimulated Tregs prolonged survival of vascularized composite allotransplants

In vivo cell tracking demonstrated that adoptive transferred Tregs migrated to and homed towards lymph nodes and allograft and persisted at these sites long term

Donor antigen stimulation induced phenotypic changes on isolated Tregs

Specific chemokines helped to recruit Tregs to the allografts

Conclusion

Acknowledgments

References

Isolation of CD4⁺CD25⁺ Treg cells