Production of santalenes and bergamotene in Nicotiana tabacum plants

Jun-Lin Yin; Woon-Seng Wong

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203249

Abstract

Terpenes play an important role in plant–insect relationships, and these relationships can potentially be modified by altering the profile of terpenes emitted from plants using metabolic engineering methods. Transgenic plants generated by employing such methods offer the prospect of low-cost sustainable pest management; in this regard, we used chloroplast targeting and cytosolic mevalonic acid pathway enhancement in this study to investigate the interaction of santalenes and bergamotene with insects. The santalene- and bergamotene-emitting transgenic tobacco plants thus generated were utilized to study host preference in the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae (Sulzer)). The results showed that co-expression of either 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR) or truncated HMGR with santalene synthase led to the production of higher amounts of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic tobacco plants, and that these santalene- and bergamotene-emitting plants were attractive to green peach aphids. We accordingly propose that such transgenic plants may have potential application in pest management as a trap crop to prevent green peach aphid infestation of wild-type tobacco plants.

Citation: Yin J-L, Wong W-S (2019) Production of santalenes and bergamotene in Nicotiana tabacum plants. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0203249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249

Editor: Björn Hamberger, Michigan State University, UNITED STATES

Received: August 16, 2018; Accepted: December 20, 2018; Published: January 4, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Yin, Wong. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was financially supported by a grant from the Singapore National Research Foundation (Competitive Research Programme Award No. NRF-CRP8-2011-02), Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21768005) and the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations: ADS, amorpha-4,11-diene synthase; DMAPP, dimethyla llyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; FPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; GC–MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; HMGR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; LTP, linalool synthase transit peptide; MVA, mevalonic-acid; RTP, RbcS secretion signal; SaSSy, santalene synthase; tHMGR, truncated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; WT, wild-type

Introduction

Volatile terpenoids play important roles in plant defense, as they normally act as deterrents or repellents against herbivorous insect, or can function as attractants to attract carnivorous insect [1–6]. Although the application of insecticides is a common and effective method of pest management, these chemicals can have undesirable side effects on the environment, promote rapid evolution of resistance in pests, and can reduce predator populations [7]. Previous studies have demonstrated that transgenic plants in which emitted volatiles had been modified by metabolic engineering can be used to deter feeding by hornworms [8], decrease aphid colonization [9–11], or attract mite predators of infesting arthropods [12]. Modification of plant volatile terpenoids through metabolic engineering thus has considerable potential to lower the cost of pest management and facilitate more sustainable agricultural practices by reducing reliance on chemical pesticide usage [13].

Volatile terpenes, including monoterpenes (C₁₀), sesquiterpenes (C₁₅), and diterpenes (C₂₀), play an important role in a wide range of plants. Plants interact with insects, surrounding plants, and pathogens by releasing volatile molecules. Monoterpenes (C₁₀) and diterpenes (C₂₀) are mainly biosynthesized via the plastidial methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway, while sesquiterpenes (C₁₅) are mainly biosynthesized from isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) via the cytosolic mevalonic-acid (MVA) pathway.[14]. In recent years, Nicotiana tabacum has served as a platform for the production of several sesquiterpenes, as this plant can be sustainably cultivated at low cost [15]. Several specific metabolic engineering methods have been developed to enhance the production of sesquiterpenes in tobacco. For instance, the reaction catalyzed by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR) is believed to be an important rate-limiting step in the tobacco MVA pathway; tobacco plants over-expressing HMGR have been shown to accumulate three to six times more sterol than wild-type plants [16]. In addition to enhancing HMGR expression, transgenic tobacco plants in which both sesquiterpene synthase and farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPS) had been targeted into chloroplasts produced 1000-fold more patchoulol or amorpha-4,11-diene compared with transgenic lines in which the responsible sesquiterpene synthase gene was expressed only in the cytosol [8,17]. Co-expression of the mitochondrial amorpha-4,11-diene synthase (ADS) gene and a truncated HMGR (tHMGR) gene has been found to increase the production of amorpha-4,11-diene in transgenic tobacco [18,19], whereas transgenic tobacco co-expressing tHMGR and FPS with a valencene synthase gene showed increased production of (+)-valencene [20]. Furthermore, squalene biosynthesis was influenced by engineering genes of FPS and squalene synthase (SQS) via the N. tabacum chloroplast genomes [21]. Therefore, co-expression of HMGR, subcellular localization of sesquiterpene synthase, and chloroplast genome transformation are considered to be three important factors that determine the production of sesquiterpenes in transgenic tobacco plants.

Sandalwood oil is an essential oil that is extracted from the heartwood of sandalwood plants (Santalum album) and is used as a popular fragrance and insect repellent [22]. However, given that sandalwood is a rare resource, the utilization of sandalwood oil is somewhat limited. Santalols and bergamotol are the major constituents of this essential oil, and are generated from santalene/bergamotene by santalene/bergamotene oxidases. In S. album plants, santalenes and bergamotene can be generated from farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) in the MVA pathway via the activity of santalene synthase (SaSSy) [23,24]. Green peach aphid (Myzus persicae (Sulzer)), an important pest affecting tobacco production, has a broad spectrum of hosts worldwide [25,26]. To date, however, metabolic engineering of santalenes and bergamotene in tobacco plants, and their interaction with green peach aphid have not been intensively studied. In the present study, we employed chloroplast targeting methodology and co-expression of FPS, HMGR or tHMGR to enhance the production of santalenes and bergamotene in N. benthamiana and N. tabacum plants. The results showed that co-expression of either HMGR or tHMGR with SaSSy enhanced the production of santalenes and bergamotene in tobacco plants; transgenic tobacco plants emitting santalenes and bergamotene showed increased attraction to the green peach aphid M. persicae (Sulzer), indicating that these transgenic tobacco plants have considerable potential as a trap crop to protect wild-type tobacco from M. persicae feeding damage.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The seeds of tobacco plants (N. benthamiana and N. tabacum SR1) provided by Prof. Nam-Hai Chua (The Rockefeller University), were grown in a glasshouse under natural light conditions. Final binary vectors were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL1 by electro-transformation, and the transformed A. tumefaciens were then infiltrated into the leaves of tobacco plants using a standard protocol [16].

Vector construction

All the vectors used in this study are shown in S1 Fig Proof HF MasterMix (Bio-Rad, USA) and Rapid DNA ligation kit (ROCHE, Swiss) were used to perform PCR and ligation, respectively.

Sequences of the RbcS secretion signal (RTP) (GenBank: NM_202369.2) and a linalool synthase transit peptide (LTP) (GenBank: JN408286.1) were amplified from Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA and Solanum lycopersicum cDNA, respectively. These sequences were then ligated into pGEM-T Easy vectors (Promega) and named pGEM-RTP and pGEM-LTP, respectively. SaSSy and FPS (GenBank: HQ343276.1 and U80605.1) were amplified and ligated into the pGEM-RTP and pGEM-LTP vectors to form pGEM-RTPFPS, pGEM-RTPSaSSy, pGEM-LTPFPS, and pGEM-LTPSaSSy constructs. The RTPSaSSy, RTPFPS, LTPSaSSy, and LTPFPS fragments were subsequently inserted into pCAMBIA1300-GFP vectors, yielding 1300-35S-RTPSaSSy-GFP, 1300-35S-RTPFPS-GFP, 1300-35S-LTPSaSSy-GFP, and 1300-35S-LTPFPS-GFP constructs, respectively. Furthermore, SaSSy or FPS was amplified and ligated into pCAMBIA1300-GFP vectors to generate 1300-35S-SaSSy-GFP and 1300-35S-FPS-GFP, respectively. The 35S promoter of the 1300-35S-RTPSaSSy-GFP and 1300-35S-SaSSy-GFP vectors was subsequently replaced with the A. thaliana RbcS promoter (GenBank: X13611.1) to yield the vectors 1300-RbcSP-RTPSaSSy-GFP and 1300-RbcSP-SaSSy-GFP, respectively.

tHMGR and HMGR (GenBank: AY488113.1) were amplified from A. thaliana cDNA and cloned into pSAT1A vectors. The OCS promoter of the pSAT1A vectors was replaced with the ubiquitin 10 promoter [27]. UBQP-tHMGR-OCST and UBQP-HMGR-OCST fragments were ligated into the 1300-RbcSP-SaSSy-GFP vector, to generate 1300-tHMGR-SaSSy and 1300-HMGR-SaSSy vectors, respectively.

RTPFPS, FPS, and SaCYPF39v1 (GenBank: KC533716.1, synthesized by Genscript) were cloned into pBA002 vectors to generate pBA-RTPFPS, pBA-FPS, and pBA-SaCYPF39v, respectively. tHMGR and HMGR were also cloned into pB7WG2D vectors to generate pB7WG2D-tHMGR and pB7WG2D-HMGR, respectively, via Gateway cloning (Invitrogen, USA). All primers, genes, and vectors used in these procedures are shown in S1 and S2 Tables, and S1 Fig

Infiltration of N. benthamlana leaves

A. tumefaciens cells were cultured in LB medium containing kanamycin (25 mg/L), spectinomycin (50 mg/L), or refampicillin (50 mg/L) and incubated at 28 °C at 250 rpm for 2 d. Thereafter, the cells were centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 g and 4 °C, resuspended with 10 mM MES buffer (containing 10 mM MgCl₂ and 100 μM acetosyringone) to a final OD₆₀₀ of 1.0, and then incubated at room temperature for 2 h. An A. tumefaciens strain encoding the TBSV P19 protein was added to suppress gene silencing[28]. Using a 1-mL syringe, A. tumefaciens cells were infiltrated into 3-week-old N. benthamiana plants grown in a glasshouse under natural light conditions. Three days after infiltration, the terpene products of the treated plants were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS).

Protein location

The A. tumefaciens strain AGL1, carrying 1300-RTPSaSSy-GFP, 1300-RTPFPS-GFP, 1300-LTPSaSSy-GFP, or 1300-LTPFPS-GFP plasmids, were injected into N. benthamiana leaves. The A. tumefaciens strain encoding the TBSV P19 protein was added to suppress gene silencing. After 2–4 days, protein localization was observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Plant transformation.

Agrobacterium-mediated leaf disc co-cultivation method was used for tobacco transformation[16]. Tobacco seeds were firstly treated with 70% ethanol for 5 min, followed by sterilization with 20% bleach (2% NaOCl) for 10 min and washed three times with sterile distilled water. Sterilized seeds were germinated on MS medium. After one month, the mature leaves were cut into 0.5 ~ 1 cm² and transformed via A. tumefaciens AGL1 containing different vectors. The transformed plants were selected on MS medium containing 50 mg/L of hygromycin or 10 mg/L of Basta as plant selection antibiotics[29]. PCR using specific primers was performed to screen transgenic tobacco lines for transgenic integration.

Analyses of extracts and headspace volatiles

Two hundred milligrams of infiltrated leaves was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted with 0.5 mL ethyl acetate at room temperature. One microliter of camphor–methanol solution (10 mg/mL), which was used as an internal standard, was added to the extracts. The extracts were prepared by shaking for 1 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the extracts were centrifuged for 5 min at 4000 g, and the upper organic layer was transferred to a new tube and dehydrated using anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄). GC–MS was used to analyze the extracts. Volatiles were collected from 10 g of detached transgenic tobacco leaves using a Push–pull headspace collection system [30] under standard growth chamber conditions (25 °C, 16-h light:8-h dark photoperiod). Two microliters of camphor–methanol solution (10 mg/mL), which was used as an internal standard, was added to the leaf surfaces. A Porapak Q trap (80 ~ 100 mesh size; Sigma, USA) was used to trap volatiles during a 24-h period. Volatiles were eluted two times with 200 μL of dichloromethane and analyzed using an Agilent GC 7890A system incorporating a 5975C inert mass-selective detector and an HP-5 MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness). Samples (2 μL) were injected at an initial oven temperature of 50 °C, which was held for 1 min and then subsequently increased to 300 °C at a rate of 8 °C/min and then held for 5 min. Compounds were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those in the NIST MS 2014 library.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from transgenic tobacco using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, German), following the manufacturer’s instructions, and cDNA was synthesized using iScript RT SuperMix (Bio-Rad, USA). Gene-specific primers (shown in S3 Table) were designed using Primer3Plus. Quantitative PCR was performed using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Life Technology, USA) in an ABI 7900 RT-PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The transcript levels of all genes were analyzed relative to a reference gene, elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1a; GenBank: D63396.1), using the ΔΔCt method [31]. For each experiment, three replicates were performed with at least three independent biological samples.

Aphids

Green peach aphids (M. persicae (Sulzer)) were provided by Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory and reared in a 52 × 52 × 50 cm cage containing eight A. thaliana plants and maintained in a growth chamber (25 °C, 16-h light:8-h dark photoperiod).

Short- and long-term insect choice experiments using transgenic tobacco

A short-term choice experiment using green peach aphids was modified from that described previously [32]. Two plants of similar size and leaf number (one wild-type (WT) and one transgenic tobacco plant) were placed in a cage (30 × 30 × 30 cm), into which 30 adult green peach aphids were released. Twenty-four hours after release, the number of aphids on each plant was recorded.

To investigate the long-term choice preferences of these aphids, two plants of similar size and leaf number (one WT and one transgenic tobacco plant) were grown in a cage (30 × 30 × 30 cm) (25 °C, 16-h light:8-h dark photoperiod), into which 30 adult green peach aphids were released. Four weeks after release, the number of aphids on each plant was recorded.

Aphid two-choice experiments using hexane solutions of santalenes and bergamotene

Two leaves from 3-week-old N. tabacum plants were placed on the surface of agar medium in plates, one leaf was treated with 20 μL of hexane solutions of santalenes and bergamotene (1 g/L), and the other leaf was treated with 20 μL of hexane as a control. After evaporation of the solvent, 10 green peach aphids were released in each plate, and 15 min after release, the number of aphids on or above the leaf was recorded.

Statistical analysis

Values are indicated as ‘mean ± SD’ for three to six biological replicates. Statistical comparison was analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test or unequal variance t′-test, and indicated by asterisks. * indicates P < 0.05; ** indicates P < 0.01.

Results

Targeting of FPS and SaSSy into chloroplasts using chloroplast transit peptides

Most chloroplast proteins are encoded by the nuclear genome and synthesized as precursors containing N-terminal targeting transit peptides. A chloroplast target peptide is a short peptide chain that directly transports a protein to a chloroplast, after which most of the transit peptide is cleaved from the protein [33]. Targeting efficiency is affected by the structure and sequence motifs of the transit peptide [34]. Sesquiterpenes are naturally synthesized from IPP and DMAPP via the cytosolic MVA pathway [14]. In order to synthesize sesquiterpenes in chloroplasts, we used a S. lycopersicum linalool synthase chloroplast transit peptide (LTP) and an A. thaliana ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit chloroplast transit peptide (RTP) to target both A. thaliana FPS and SaSSy proteins into chloroplasts.

FPS, SaSSy, LTP, and RTP sequences were inserted into pCambia1300-GFP vectors to generate 1300-35SP-LTP-FPS-GFP, 1300-35SP-LTP-SaSSy-GFP, 1300-35SP-RTP-FPS-GFP, and 1300-35SP-RTP-SaSSy-GFP vectors, respectively (S1 Fig). Three days after N. benthamiana agro-infiltration, the subcellular locations of FPS and SaSSy proteins were examined using confocal microscopy (Fig 1). The presence of a green fluorescent protein signal (GFP) showed that native FPS and SaSSy proteins are both typically located in the cytoplasm of WT plants (Fig 1A and 1B), whereas after fusion with LTP, the GFP signal of LTP-SaSSy was observed in chloroplasts. In contrast, the LTP-FPS protein appeared in both cytoplasm and chloroplasts (Fig 1C and 1D). Compared with the localization of LTP-SaSSy and LTP-FPS proteins, the GFP signals of RTP-FPS and RTP-SaSSy were exclusively visible in the chloroplasts (Fig 1E and 1F). These observations indicated that the targeting efficiency of RTP is higher than that of the LTP, as it completely conveyed both FPS and SaSSy proteins into the chloroplasts. To further study the effects of co-expression of RTP-FPS and RTP-SaSSy on the production of santalenes and bergamotene, these genes were over-expressed in both N. benthamiana and N. tabacum.

Download:

Fig 1. Localization of TP-FPS-GFP, TP-SaSSy-GFP, FPS-GFP, and SaSSy-GFP proteins in the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana.

(A) FPS-GFP located in the cytoplasm, scale bar = 20 μm; (B) SaSSy-GFP located in the cytoplasm, scale bar = 50 μm; (C) LTP-FPS-GFP located in both cytoplasm and chloroplasts, scale bar = 20 μm; (D) LTP-SaSSy-GFP located in the chloroplasts, scale bar = 10 μm; (E) RTP-FPS-GFP located in the chloroplasts, scale bar = 20 μm; (F) RTP-SaSSy-GFP located in the chloroplasts, scale bar = 20 μm. Solid arrow, GFP signal in cytoplasm; Dotted arrow, GFP signal in chloroplast; LTP, Solanum lycopersicum linalool synthase transit peptide; RTP, Arabidopsis thaliana ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit transit peptide; SaSSy, Santalum album santalene synthase; FPS, A. thaliana farnesyl diphosphate synthase; GFP, green fluorescent protein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.g001

Effects of different metabolic engineering methods on the production of santalenes and bergamotene in N. benthamiana

To assess the effects of chloroplast targeting and MVA enhancement strategies using A. thaliana FPS, HMGR or tHMGR on the production of santalenes and bergamotene, we transiently co-expressed the two genes together in N. benthamiana (RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy, FPS + SaSSy, HMGR + SaSSy, or tHMGR + SaSSy). To avoid gene silencing mediated by promoter homology [35], the SaSSy or RTP-SaSSy genes were placed under the control of the RbcS promoter of A. thaliana, whereas each of the RTP-FPS, FPS, tHMGR, and HMGR sequences was expressed under the control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter.

Three days after N. benthamiana agro-infiltration, 200 mg of treated leaves from each plant was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted using ethyl acetate, and the resulting extracts were analyzed by GC–MS. Although no santalenes or bergamotene were observed in the wild-type N. benthamiana plant and N. benthamiana leaves transiently expressing a single gene (SaSSy) (Fig 2A), trace amounts of santalenes and bergamotene were found in lines transiently co-expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy or FPS + SaSSy (Fig 2A), which indicated that the chloroplast targeting and FPS enhancement strategies slightly increased the production of santalenes and bergamotene. When tHMGR was transiently co-expressed with SaSSy, the tobacco plants accumulated 1025.8 ng·g^-1 fresh weight (FW) of α-santalene, 354.8 ng·g^-1 FW of α-bergamotene, 68.8 ng·g^-1 FW of Epi-β-santalene, and 885.1 ng·g^-1 FW of β-santalene, the values of which were approximately 50 times higher than the amounts produced using the chloroplast targeting and FPS enhancement strategies (Table 1 and Fig 2B). In addition, co-expression with HMGR also yielded high amounts of santalenes and bergamotene: 984.8 ng·g^-1 FW of α-santalene, 324.1 ng·g^-1 FW of α-bergamotene, 40.5 ng·g^-1 FW of Epi-β-santalene, and 830.0 ng·g^-1 FW of β-santalene (Table 1 and Fig 2B). Therefore, the HMGR or tHMGR MVA enhancement strategy is suggested to be a more suitable method for enhancing the yields of santalenes and bergamotene in N. benthamiana. To further evaluate the effects of the different metabolic engineering methods on the production of santalenes and bergamotene, we transformed N. tabacum plants with RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy, FPS + SaSSy, tHMGR + SaSSy, or HMGR + SaSSy.

Download:

Fig 2. Chloroplast targeting and MVA enhancement strategies enhance the production of santalenes and bergamotene in Nicotiana benthamiana agro-infiltrated leaves.

(A) The production of santalenes and bergamotene in N. benthamiana transiently expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy or FPS + SaSSy; (B) The production of santalenes and bergamotene in N. benthamiana transiently expressing tHMGR + SaSSy or HMGR + SaSSy. RTP, Arabidopsis thaliana ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit transit peptide; SaSSy, Santalum album santalene synthase; FPS, A. thaliana farnesyl diphosphate synthase; HMGR, A. thaliana 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; tHMGR, A. thaliana truncated HMGR; WT, wild type; S, lines expressing SaSSy; FS, lines transiently expressing FPS + SaSSy; RTPFS, lines transiently expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy; tHS, lines transiently expressing tHMGR + SaSSy; HS, lines transiently expressing HMGR + SaSSy. The mean ± SD values of three biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences of total santalenes and bergamotene from S based on Student’s unequal variance t′-test (* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.g002

Download:

Table 1. Yields of santalenes and bergamotene in Nicotiana benthamiana using agro-infiltration (ng·g^-1 fresh weight).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.t001

HMGR and tHMGR enhance the production of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic N. tabacum

The GC–MS results of N. benthamiana agro-infiltration experiments indicated that chloroplast targeting and co-expression of FPS, HMGR or tHMGR improved the production of santalenes and bergamotene to different levels. To further investigate the effects of these metabolic engineering methods on the production of santalenes and bergamotene in stable transgenic N. tabacum plants, different gene combinations (SaSSy, RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy, FPS + SaSSy, tHMGR + SaSSy, or HMGR + SaSSy) were used to transform N. tabacum. For each transformation event, three independent lines with similar relative expression levels of SaSSy were selected from at least 10 lines of transgenic plants and GC–MS was performed to analyze the volatiles produced by each of the selected transgenic plants.

No santalenes or bergamotene were observed in the wild-type N. tabacum plant (Table 2, Fig 3B and 3D). Three transgenic lines (S3, S4, and S16) expressing a single SaSSy, which had comparable relative transcript level of SaSSy (S2 Fig and Fig 3A), produced 162.6−241.8 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-santalene, 17.1−25.5 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-bergamotene, 11.5−18.3 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of epi-β-santalene, and 73.9−166.6 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of β-santalene (Table 2 and Fig 3B). Additionally, three transgenic lines (RTPFS8, 10, and 15) expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy (S2 Fig and Fig 3A), each of which had relative expression levels of SaSSy similar to those of S3, 4, and 16, produced 85.1−112.2 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-santalene, 11.6−19.1 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-bergamotene, 14.1−45.7 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of epi-β-santalene, and 58.7−82.2 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of β-santalene (Table 2 and Fig 3B). These results showed that the average production of santalenes and bergamotene in RTPFS8, 10, and 15 was slightly lower than that of S3, S4, and S16.

Download:

Table 2. Yields of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum (ng·g^-1·fresh weight 24 h^-1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.t002

Download:

Fig 3. The HMGR and tHMGR MVA enhancement strategy enhances the production of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum.

(A) Relative transcript level analysis of transgenic N. tabacum expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy or FPS + SaSSy; (B) Production of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic N. tabacum expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy or FPS + SaSSy; (C) Relative transcript level analysis of transgenic N. tabacum expressing tHMGR + SaSSy or HMGR + SaSSy; (D) The production of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic N. tabacum expressing tHMGR + SaSSy or HMGR + SaSSy. (E) GC–MS chromatograms of transgenic N. tabacum headspace volatiles. RTP, Arabidopsis thaliana ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit transit peptide; SaSSy, Santalum album santalene synthase; FPS, A. thaliana farnesyl diphosphate synthase; HMGR, A. thaliana 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; tHMGR, A. thaliana truncated HMGR. SaCYP76F39v1, Santalum album santalene/bergamotene oxidase(CYP76F39v1). EF1A-1 was used as a control gene. WT, wild type; S, lines expressing SaSSy; FS, lines expressing FPS + SaSSy; RTPFS, lines expressing RTP-FPS + RTP-SaSSy; tHS, lines expressing tHMGR + SaSSy; HS, lines expressing HMGR + SaSSy; HSP, the transgenic lines expressing HMGR + SaSSy + SaCYP76F39v1. The peak 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 correspond to camphor (Internal Standard), α-santalene, α-bergamotene, epi-β-santalene, β-santalene, respectively. The mean ± SD values of three biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences of total santalenes and bergamotene from S4 based on Student’s unequal variance t′-test (* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.g003

Using the same method, FS1, 10, and 15 (expressing FPS + SaSSy); tHS10, 11, and 13 (expressing tHMGR + SaSSy); and HS4, 5, and 6 (expressing HMGR + SaSSy) lines were selected from corresponding transgenic plants (S2 Fig and Fig 3C). The FS1, 10, and 15 lines produced approximately 98.7−315.3 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-santalene, 19.1−54.1 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-bergamotene, 6.4−23.2 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of epi-β-santalene, and 21.9−169.7 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of β-santalene (Table 2 and Fig 3B). The average production of santalenes and bergamotene in FS1, 10 and 15 was similar to that of S3, S4, and S16 plants. Furthermore, tHS10, 11, and 13 lines produced 557.2−1125.1 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-santalene, 21.3−114.3 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-bergamotene, 3.1−207.7 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of epi-β-santalene, and 314.3−1275.7 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of β-santalene, whereas the HS4, 5, and 6 lines produced 495.7−2946.1 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-santalene, 52.2−268.6 ng·g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of α-bergamotene, 31.7−294.2 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of epi-β-santalene, and 207.7−1732.3 ng g^-1 FW·24 h^-1 of β-santalene (Table 2 and Fig 3D). These results revealed that co-expression of SaSSy with either HMGR or tHMGR produced 500 to 1000 times more santalenes and bergamotene than the S3, S4, and S16 lines, indicating that HMGR or tHMGR could substantially enhance the carbon flux within the MVA pathway in N. tabacum plants, which was thereby available for santalene and bergamotene biosynthesis. The GC–MS chromatography and MS data for transgenic tobacco headspace samples are shown in S3 Fig.

Production of santalols and bergamotol in transgenic tobacco

Santalols and bergamotol, which are major components of sandalwood essential oil, are generated from santalenes and bergamotene by S. album santalene/bergamotene CYP76F cytochrome P450 [23]. The results of the present study indicated that co-expression of HMGR in transgenic tobacco could enhance the production of santalenes and bergamotene. We subsequently employed HMGR, SaSSy, and S. album santalene/bergamotene oxidase SaCYP76F39v1 [23] to produce santalols and bergamotol in tobacco. To avoid gene silencing caused by promoter homology [35], three strong constitutive promoters, Arabidopsis ubiquitin 10 [27], RbcS, and 35S promoters were used to control these three genes respectively. Unfortunately, only santalenes and bergamotene were detected in both agro-infiltrated N. benthamiana plants and transgenic N. tabacum plants co-expressing HMGR, SaSSy, and SaCYP76F39v1) (Fig 3E and S3 Fig), the relative gene expression levels of which were analyzed by qRT-PCR (S2 Fig).

To detect the presence of glycosylated santalols and bergamotol in transgenic tobacco plants, homogenized HSP1 leaves were treated with either a saturated CaCl₂ solution or a glycosidase [36]. In the present study, we were unable to detect any santalols or bergamotol in either untreated or treated leaves of HSP1 line plants (S4 Fig). These results indicate that santalols and bergamotol were not stored as nonvolatile santalols/bergamotol–glycoside forms in leaf tissues or cells of transgenic tobacco plants.

Interaction of aphids with transgenic N. tabacum emitting santalenes and bergamotene

Green peach aphids are major pests of many commercial crops, not only causing feeding damage but also transmitting various viruses that can result in substantial losses [37]. To investigate the interaction of aphids with transgenic N. tabacum plants emitting santalenes and bergamotene, two-choice experiments were performed to examine green peach aphid preference between WT and transgenic tobacco plants [38]. Initially, we conducted short-term two-choice experiments using plants placed in a cage (Fig 4A), which revealed that 59.8% to 63.6% of aphids showed a preference for the transgenic tobacco plants (S3, 4, and 16), indicating that the transgenic plants emitting santalenes and bergamotene tended to attract aphids to a greater extent than the WT plants. Subsequently, to examine the long-term preference of insects for either WT or transgenic tobacco plants. Four weeks after releasing aphids, we observed that 67.1% to 67.3% of aphids showed preference for transgenic tobacco (S3, 4, and 16; Fig 4B and 4D, S5 Fig). These results indicated that the transgenic plants emitting santalenes and bergamotene were more attractive to aphids over the long-term. To further confirm the aphid-attractant properties of santalenes and bergamotene, solutions of these terpenes were also utilized in two-choice tests using agar medium plates. Consistent with the transgenic tobacco choice tests, the leaves of wild-type N. tabacum plants treated with santalene and bergamotene solutions also proved to be more attractive to green peach aphids (Fig 4C and S6 Fig).

Download:

Fig 4. Green peach aphid choice experiments.

(A) Transgenic tobacco lines emitting santalenes and bergamotene attracted aphids over the short-term in two-choice experiments (n = 8); (B) Long-term choice experiments for aphids using the transgenic lines and WT tobacco in a growth chamber (n = 8); (C) Green peach aphid two-choice experiments using agar medium plates treated with santalene and bergamotene solutions and hexane (n = 8); (D) Aphids on the leaves of transgenic line and WT tobacco in the long-term choice experiment, scale bar = 1 cm. WT, wild type; S, lines expressing SaSSy; Mock, wild-type Nicotiana tabacum leaves treated with hexane; S/B, wild-type N. tabacum leaves treated with santalene and bergamotene solution. The mean ± SD values for eight biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the WT based on Student’s t-test (* P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.g004

Discussion

Insects can locate their host plants by detecting specific olfactory signals. Plant volatiles play an important role in this host-location process, and herbivorous insects can distinguish certain host plants from the ratio-specific blends of specific volatiles produced by these plants [39]. In the short-term two-choice experiment conducted in the present study, we found that when given the choice between transgenic and WT tobacco plants, green peach aphids show a preference for the former. Similar results were obtained in long-term choice experiments, with most green peach aphids showing a preference for transgenic tobacco (Fig 4B and 4C).

trans-α-Bergamotene has been identified as an active compound in the sex attractant recognized by male Melittobia digitata [40], and may play a similar important role in the interaction with green peach aphids. However, given that purified standards of α-santalene, trans-α-bergamotene, epi-β-santalene, and β-santalene are currently commercially unavailable, this somewhat limits our scope for further investigating the interaction of each of these compounds with aphids.

The use of trap crops is one of the most effective pesticide-free pest management strategies, in which phytophagous pests are typically attracted away from the main crop [41]. Green peach aphids are very common and a source of considerable damage to agricultural plants. To combat these pests, employment of trap crops is one of the several major control methods [42]. Our short- and long-term choice experiments demonstrate that transgenic tobacco can potentially be deployed to serve as a trap crop for green peach aphid management.

In conclusion, we utilized an optimized HMGR or tHMGR MVA pathway strategy to generate higher amounts of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic tobacco plants. However, the santalenes and bergamotene thus produced could not be further hydroxylated to santalols and bergamotol by S. album santalene/bergamotene oxidase. In both short- and long-term choice experiments, green peach aphids were strongly attracted to transgenic tobacco lines emitting santalenes/bergamotene, indicating that such lines could be employed as a trap crop to prevent green peach aphid infestation in wild-type tobacco. In the future, we plan to conduct field trials to assess the potential utility of these transgenic lines in pest management.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in vector construction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s001

(PPTX)

S2 Table. Gene names and GenBank reference numbers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s002

(PPTX)

S3 Table. Primers used in qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s003

(PPTX)

S1 Fig. Vector construction for santalol biosynthesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s004

(PPTX)

S2 Fig. Relative transcript level analysis of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s005

(PPTX)

S3 Fig. GC–MS chromatograms of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum headspace volatiles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s006

(PPTX)

S4 Fig. GC–MS analysis of glycosylated santalols/bergamotol in transgenic tobacco (HSP1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s007

(PPTX)

S5 Fig. Green peach aphid long-term choice experiments using santalene- and bergamotene-emitting transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s008

(PPTX)

S6 Fig. Green peach aphids two-choice experiments on agar medium plates using santalene and bergamotene solutions: Scale bar = 1 cm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203249.s009

(PPTX)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Professor Ji Lianghui for provision of santalene and bergamotene solutions.

References

1. Dudareva N, Pichersky E. Metabolic engineering of plant volatiles. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008; 19 (2): 181–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.011 pmid:18394878.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Nagegowda DA. Plant volatile terpenoid metabolism: biosynthetic genes, transcriptional regulation and subcellular compartmentation. FEBS Lett. 2010; 584 (14): 2965–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.045 pmid:20553718.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Dudareva N, DellaPenna D. Plant metabolic engineering: future prospects and challenges. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013; 24 (2): 226–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.002 pmid:23434180.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Dudareva N, Klempien A, Muhlemann JK, Kaplan I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013; 198 (1): 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12145 pmid:23383981.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Bruce TJ, Aradottir GI, Smart LE, Martin JL, Caulfield JC, Doherty A, et al. The first crop plant genetically engineered to release an insect pheromone for defence. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 11183. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11183 pmid:26108150.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Schuman MC, Allmann S, Baldwin IT. Plant defense phenotypes determine the consequences of volatile emission for individuals and neighbors. Elife. 2015; 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04490 pmid:25873033.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Dedryver CA, Le Ralec A, Fabre F. The conflicting relationships between aphids and men: a review of aphid damage and control strategies. C R Biol. 2010; 333 (6–7): 539–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.03.009 pmid:20541165.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Wu S, Schalk M, Clark A, Miles RB, Coates R, Chappell J. Redirection of cytosolic or plastidic isoprenoid precursors elevates terpene production in plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2006; 24 (11): 1441–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1251 pmid:17057703.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Aharoni A, Giri AP, Deuerlein S, Griepink F, de Kogel WJ, Verstappen FW, et al. Terpenoid metabolism in wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell. 2003; 15 (12): 2866–84. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.016253 pmid:14630967.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Beale MH, Birkett MA, Bruce TJ, Chamberlain K, Field LM, Huttly AK, et al. Aphid alarm pheromone produced by transgenic plants affects aphid and parasitoid behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103 (27): 10509–13. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603998103 pmid:16798877.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Yu XD, Pickett J, Ma YZ, Bruce T, Napier J, Jones HD, et al. Metabolic engineering of plant-derived (E)-beta-farnesene synthase genes for a novel type of aphid-resistant genetically modified crop plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012; 54 (5): 282–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01107.x pmid:22348813.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Kappers IF, Aharoni A, van Herpen TW, Luckerhoff LL, Dicke M, Bouwmeester HJ. Genetic engineering of terpenoid metabolism attracts bodyguards to Arabidopsis. Science. 2005; 309 (5743): 2070–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116232 pmid:16179482.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Lange BM, Ahkami A. Metabolic engineering of plant monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and diterpenes—current status and future opportunities. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11 (2): 169–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12022 pmid:23171352.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Tholl D, Lee S. Terpene Specialized Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arabidopsis Book. 2011; 9: e0143. https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0143 pmid:22303268.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Tremblay R, Wang D, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. Tobacco, a highly efficient green bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28 (2): 214–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.008 pmid:19961918.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Chappell J, Wolf F, Proulx J, Cuellar R, Saunders C. Is the Reaction Catalyzed by 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase a Rate-Limiting Step for Isoprenoid Biosynthesis in Plants? Plant Physiol. 1995; 109 (4): 1337–43. pmid:12228673.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Zhang Y, Nowak G, Reed DW, Covello PS. The production of artemisinin precursors in tobacco. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011; 9 (4): 445–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00556.x pmid:20723135.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. van Herpen TW, Cankar K, Nogueira M, Bosch D, Bouwmeester HJ, Beekwilder J. Nicotiana benthamiana as a production platform for artemisinin precursors. PLoS One. 2010; 5 (12): e14222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014222 pmid:21151979.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Farhi M, Marhevka E, Ben-Ari J, Algamas-Dimantov A, Liang Z, Zeevi V, et al. Generation of the potent anti-malarial drug artemisinin in tobacco. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29 (12): 1072–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2054 pmid:22158354.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Cankar K, Jongedijk E, Klompmaker M, Majdic T, Mumm R, Bouwmeester H, et al. (+)-Valencene production in Nicotiana benthamiana is increased by down-regulation of competing pathways. Biotechnol J. 2015; 10 (1): 180–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400288 pmid:25159317.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Pasoreck EK, Su J, Silverman IM, Gosai SJ, Gregory BD, Yuan JS, et al. Terpene metabolic engineering via nuclear or chloroplast genomes profoundly and globally impacts off-target pathways through metabolite signalling. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016; 14 (9): 1862–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12548 pmid:27507797.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Ritchie SA, Williams CR, Montgomery BL. Field evaluation of New Mountain Sandalwood Mosquito Sticks and New Mountain Sandalwood Botanical Repellent against mosquitoes in North Queensland, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006; 22 (1): 158–60. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22[158:feonms]2.0.co;2 pmid:16646344.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Diaz-Chavez ML, Moniodis J, Madilao LL, Jancsik S, Keeling CI, Barbour EL, et al. Biosynthesis of Sandalwood Oil: Santalum album CYP76F cytochromes P450 produce santalols and bergamotol. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (9): e75053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075053 pmid:24324844.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Jones CG, Moniodis J, Zulak KG, Scaffidi A, Plummer JA, Ghisalberti EL, et al. Sandalwood fragrance biosynthesis involves sesquiterpene synthases of both the terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies, including santalene synthases. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286 (20): 17445–54. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.231787 pmid:21454632.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Zhao C, Yang XM, Tang SH, Xu PJ, Bian WJ, Wang XF, et al. Population genetic structure of Myzus persicae nicotianae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in China by microsatellite analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14 (4): 17159–69. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.December.16.16 pmid:26681063.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Li R, Islam SU, Wu Z, Ye X. Bensulfuron-Methyl Treatment of Soil Affects the Infestation of Whitefly, Aphid, and Tobacco Mosaic Virus on Nicotiana tabacum. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1970. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01970 pmid:28083007.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Grefen C, Donald N, Hashimoto K, Kudla J, Schumacher K, Blatt MR. A ubiquitin-10 promoter-based vector set for fluorescent protein tagging facilitates temporal stability and native protein distribution in transient and stable expression studies. Plant J. 2010; 64 (2): 355–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04322.x pmid:20735773.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Garabagi F, Gilbert E, Loos A, McLean MD, Hall JC. Utility of the P19 suppressor of gene-silencing protein for production of therapeutic antibodies in Nicotiana expression hosts. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012; 10 (9): 1118–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00742.x pmid:22984968.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985; 227 (4691): 1229–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.227.4691.1229 pmid:17757866.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Tholl D, Boland W, Hansel A, Loreto F, Röse USR, Schnitzler J-P. Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis. Plant J. 2006; 45 (4): 540–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02612.x pmid:16441348
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Liu D, Shi L, Han C, Yu J, Li D, Zhang Y. Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in virus-infected Nicotiana benthamiana using quantitative real-time PCR. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (9): e46451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046451 pmid:23029521.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Kamphuis LG, Lichtenzveig J, Peng K, Guo SM, Klingler JP, Siddique KH, et al. Characterization and genetic dissection of resistance to spotted alfalfa aphid (Therioaphis trifolii) in Medicago truncatula. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64 (16): 5157–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert305 pmid:24058162.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Li HM, Chiu CC. Protein transport into chloroplasts. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61: 157–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112222 pmid:20192748.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Lee DW, Lee S, Lee GJ, Lee KH, Kim S, Cheong GW, et al. Functional characterization of sequence motifs in the transit peptide of Arabidopsis small subunit of rubisco. Plant Physiol. 2006; 140 (2): 466–83. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.074575 pmid:16384899.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Park YD, Papp I, Moscone EA, Iglesias VA, Vaucheret H, Matzke AJ, et al. Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J. 1996; 9 (2): 183–94. pmid:8820605.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Yin JL, Wong WS, Jang IC, Chua NH. Co-expression of peppermint geranyl diphosphate synthase small subunit enhances monoterpene production in transgenic tobacco plants. New Phytol. 2017; 213 (3): 1133–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14280 pmid:28079933.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Navas-Castillo J, Fiallo-Olive E, Sanchez-Campos S. Emerging virus diseases transmitted by whiteflies. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011; 49: 219–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095235 pmid:21568700.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Herbert JJ, Mizell RF 3rd, McAuslane HJ. Host preference of the crapemyrtle aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and host suitability of crapemyrtle cultivars. Environ Entomol. 2009; 38 (4): 1155–60. pmid:19689894.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Bruce TJ, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10 (6): 269–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.003 pmid:15949760.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Cjnsoli FL, Williams HJ, Vinson SB, Matthews RW, Cooperband MF. Trans-bergamotenes-male pheromone of the ectoparasitoid Melittobia digitata. J Chem Ecol. 2002; 28 (8): 1675–89. pmid:12371819.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Shelton AM, Badenes-Perez FR. Concepts and applications of trap cropping in pest management. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006; 51: 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.150959 pmid:16332213.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Goolsby JA, DeBarro PJ, Kirk AA, Sutherst RW, Canas L, Ciomperlik MA, et al. Post-release evaluation of biological control of Bemisia tabaci biotype “B” in the USA and the development of predictive tools to guide introductions for other countries. Biological Control. 2005; 32 (1): 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.07.012
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Dudareva N, Pichersky E. Metabolic engineering of plant volatiles. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008; 19 (2): 181–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.011 pmid:18394878.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Nagegowda DA. Plant volatile terpenoid metabolism: biosynthetic genes, transcriptional regulation and subcellular compartmentation. FEBS Lett. 2010; 584 (14): 2965–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.045 pmid:20553718.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Dudareva N, DellaPenna D. Plant metabolic engineering: future prospects and challenges. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013; 24 (2): 226–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.002 pmid:23434180.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Dudareva N, Klempien A, Muhlemann JK, Kaplan I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013; 198 (1): 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12145 pmid:23383981.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Bruce TJ, Aradottir GI, Smart LE, Martin JL, Caulfield JC, Doherty A, et al. The first crop plant genetically engineered to release an insect pheromone for defence. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 11183. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11183 pmid:26108150.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Schuman MC, Allmann S, Baldwin IT. Plant defense phenotypes determine the consequences of volatile emission for individuals and neighbors. Elife. 2015; 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04490 pmid:25873033.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Dedryver CA, Le Ralec A, Fabre F. The conflicting relationships between aphids and men: a review of aphid damage and control strategies. C R Biol. 2010; 333 (6–7): 539–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.03.009 pmid:20541165.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Wu S, Schalk M, Clark A, Miles RB, Coates R, Chappell J. Redirection of cytosolic or plastidic isoprenoid precursors elevates terpene production in plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2006; 24 (11): 1441–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1251 pmid:17057703.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Aharoni A, Giri AP, Deuerlein S, Griepink F, de Kogel WJ, Verstappen FW, et al. Terpenoid metabolism in wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell. 2003; 15 (12): 2866–84. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.016253 pmid:14630967.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Beale MH, Birkett MA, Bruce TJ, Chamberlain K, Field LM, Huttly AK, et al. Aphid alarm pheromone produced by transgenic plants affects aphid and parasitoid behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103 (27): 10509–13. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603998103 pmid:16798877.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Yu XD, Pickett J, Ma YZ, Bruce T, Napier J, Jones HD, et al. Metabolic engineering of plant-derived (E)-beta-farnesene synthase genes for a novel type of aphid-resistant genetically modified crop plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012; 54 (5): 282–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01107.x pmid:22348813.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Kappers IF, Aharoni A, van Herpen TW, Luckerhoff LL, Dicke M, Bouwmeester HJ. Genetic engineering of terpenoid metabolism attracts bodyguards to Arabidopsis. Science. 2005; 309 (5743): 2070–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116232 pmid:16179482.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Lange BM, Ahkami A. Metabolic engineering of plant monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and diterpenes—current status and future opportunities. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11 (2): 169–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12022 pmid:23171352.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Tholl D, Lee S. Terpene Specialized Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arabidopsis Book. 2011; 9: e0143. https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0143 pmid:22303268.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Tremblay R, Wang D, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. Tobacco, a highly efficient green bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28 (2): 214–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.008 pmid:19961918.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Chappell J, Wolf F, Proulx J, Cuellar R, Saunders C. Is the Reaction Catalyzed by 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase a Rate-Limiting Step for Isoprenoid Biosynthesis in Plants? Plant Physiol. 1995; 109 (4): 1337–43. pmid:12228673.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Zhang Y, Nowak G, Reed DW, Covello PS. The production of artemisinin precursors in tobacco. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011; 9 (4): 445–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00556.x pmid:20723135.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. van Herpen TW, Cankar K, Nogueira M, Bosch D, Bouwmeester HJ, Beekwilder J. Nicotiana benthamiana as a production platform for artemisinin precursors. PLoS One. 2010; 5 (12): e14222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014222 pmid:21151979.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Farhi M, Marhevka E, Ben-Ari J, Algamas-Dimantov A, Liang Z, Zeevi V, et al. Generation of the potent anti-malarial drug artemisinin in tobacco. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29 (12): 1072–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2054 pmid:22158354.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Cankar K, Jongedijk E, Klompmaker M, Majdic T, Mumm R, Bouwmeester H, et al. (+)-Valencene production in Nicotiana benthamiana is increased by down-regulation of competing pathways. Biotechnol J. 2015; 10 (1): 180–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400288 pmid:25159317.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Pasoreck EK, Su J, Silverman IM, Gosai SJ, Gregory BD, Yuan JS, et al. Terpene metabolic engineering via nuclear or chloroplast genomes profoundly and globally impacts off-target pathways through metabolite signalling. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016; 14 (9): 1862–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12548 pmid:27507797.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Ritchie SA, Williams CR, Montgomery BL. Field evaluation of New Mountain Sandalwood Mosquito Sticks and New Mountain Sandalwood Botanical Repellent against mosquitoes in North Queensland, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006; 22 (1): 158–60. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22[158:feonms]2.0.co;2 pmid:16646344.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Diaz-Chavez ML, Moniodis J, Madilao LL, Jancsik S, Keeling CI, Barbour EL, et al. Biosynthesis of Sandalwood Oil: Santalum album CYP76F cytochromes P450 produce santalols and bergamotol. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (9): e75053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075053 pmid:24324844.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Jones CG, Moniodis J, Zulak KG, Scaffidi A, Plummer JA, Ghisalberti EL, et al. Sandalwood fragrance biosynthesis involves sesquiterpene synthases of both the terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies, including santalene synthases. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286 (20): 17445–54. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.231787 pmid:21454632.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Zhao C, Yang XM, Tang SH, Xu PJ, Bian WJ, Wang XF, et al. Population genetic structure of Myzus persicae nicotianae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in China by microsatellite analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14 (4): 17159–69. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.December.16.16 pmid:26681063.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Li R, Islam SU, Wu Z, Ye X. Bensulfuron-Methyl Treatment of Soil Affects the Infestation of Whitefly, Aphid, and Tobacco Mosaic Virus on Nicotiana tabacum. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1970. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01970 pmid:28083007.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Grefen C, Donald N, Hashimoto K, Kudla J, Schumacher K, Blatt MR. A ubiquitin-10 promoter-based vector set for fluorescent protein tagging facilitates temporal stability and native protein distribution in transient and stable expression studies. Plant J. 2010; 64 (2): 355–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04322.x pmid:20735773.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Garabagi F, Gilbert E, Loos A, McLean MD, Hall JC. Utility of the P19 suppressor of gene-silencing protein for production of therapeutic antibodies in Nicotiana expression hosts. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012; 10 (9): 1118–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00742.x pmid:22984968.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985; 227 (4691): 1229–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.227.4691.1229 pmid:17757866.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Tholl D, Boland W, Hansel A, Loreto F, Röse USR, Schnitzler J-P. Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis. Plant J. 2006; 45 (4): 540–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02612.x pmid:16441348
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Liu D, Shi L, Han C, Yu J, Li D, Zhang Y. Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in virus-infected Nicotiana benthamiana using quantitative real-time PCR. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (9): e46451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046451 pmid:23029521.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Kamphuis LG, Lichtenzveig J, Peng K, Guo SM, Klingler JP, Siddique KH, et al. Characterization and genetic dissection of resistance to spotted alfalfa aphid (Therioaphis trifolii) in Medicago truncatula. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64 (16): 5157–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert305 pmid:24058162.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Li HM, Chiu CC. Protein transport into chloroplasts. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61: 157–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112222 pmid:20192748.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Lee DW, Lee S, Lee GJ, Lee KH, Kim S, Cheong GW, et al. Functional characterization of sequence motifs in the transit peptide of Arabidopsis small subunit of rubisco. Plant Physiol. 2006; 140 (2): 466–83. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.074575 pmid:16384899.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Park YD, Papp I, Moscone EA, Iglesias VA, Vaucheret H, Matzke AJ, et al. Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J. 1996; 9 (2): 183–94. pmid:8820605.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Yin JL, Wong WS, Jang IC, Chua NH. Co-expression of peppermint geranyl diphosphate synthase small subunit enhances monoterpene production in transgenic tobacco plants. New Phytol. 2017; 213 (3): 1133–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14280 pmid:28079933.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Navas-Castillo J, Fiallo-Olive E, Sanchez-Campos S. Emerging virus diseases transmitted by whiteflies. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011; 49: 219–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095235 pmid:21568700.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Herbert JJ, Mizell RF 3rd, McAuslane HJ. Host preference of the crapemyrtle aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and host suitability of crapemyrtle cultivars. Environ Entomol. 2009; 38 (4): 1155–60. pmid:19689894.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Bruce TJ, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10 (6): 269–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.003 pmid:15949760.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Cjnsoli FL, Williams HJ, Vinson SB, Matthews RW, Cooperband MF. Trans-bergamotenes-male pheromone of the ectoparasitoid Melittobia digitata. J Chem Ecol. 2002; 28 (8): 1675–89. pmid:12371819.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Shelton AM, Badenes-Perez FR. Concepts and applications of trap cropping in pest management. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006; 51: 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.150959 pmid:16332213.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Goolsby JA, DeBarro PJ, Kirk AA, Sutherst RW, Canas L, Ciomperlik MA, et al. Post-release evaluation of biological control of Bemisia tabaci biotype “B” in the USA and the development of predictive tools to guide introductions for other countries. Biological Control. 2005; 32 (1): 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.07.012
View Article
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Vector construction

Infiltration of N. benthamlana leaves

Protein location

Plant transformation.

Analyses of extracts and headspace volatiles

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR

Aphids

Short- and long-term insect choice experiments using transgenic tobacco

Aphid two-choice experiments using hexane solutions of santalenes and bergamotene

Statistical analysis

Results

Targeting of FPS and SaSSy into chloroplasts using chloroplast transit peptides

Effects of different metabolic engineering methods on the production of santalenes and bergamotene in N. benthamiana

HMGR and tHMGR enhance the production of santalenes and bergamotene in transgenic N. tabacum

Production of santalols and bergamotol in transgenic tobacco

Interaction of aphids with transgenic N. tabacum emitting santalenes and bergamotene

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in vector construction.

S2 Table. Gene names and GenBank reference numbers.

S3 Table. Primers used in qPCR.

S1 Fig. Vector construction for santalol biosynthesis.

S2 Fig. Relative transcript level analysis of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum.

S3 Fig. GC–MS chromatograms of transgenic Nicotiana tabacum headspace volatiles.

S4 Fig. GC–MS analysis of glycosylated santalols/bergamotol in transgenic tobacco (HSP1).

S5 Fig. Green peach aphid long-term choice experiments using santalene- and bergamotene-emitting transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants.

S6 Fig. Green peach aphids two-choice experiments on agar medium plates using santalene and bergamotene solutions: Scale bar = 1 cm.

Acknowledgments

References