Figures
Fig 2 is incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.
Results obtained for the indicators selected under a fractional-reserve system–without government intervention (red dotted line) and with government intervention when the total natural resource stock is at 25% (yellow short-dash) and 50% (green solid line)–and under a full-reserve system (purple long-dash line). Black coloured curves (i.e. dotted, solid, short and long-dashed) show the mean values, whereas coloured bands represent the standard error bars including all the runs computed for each indicator under every scenario.
Reference
- 1. Gonzalez-Redin J, Polhill JG, Dawson TP, Hill R, Gordon IJ (2018) It's not the 'what', but the 'how': Exploring the role of debt in natural resource (un)sustainability. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0201141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201141 pmid:30028881
Citation: Gonzalez-Redin J, Polhill JG, Dawson TP, Hill R, Gordon IJ (2018) Correction: It's not the 'what', but the 'how': Exploring the role of debt in natural resource (un)sustainability. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0202509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202509
Published: August 13, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Gonzalez-Redin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.