Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Self-reported sexual orientation among undergraduates of 10 universities in Guangzhou, China

  • Yuan Yan,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Mental Health Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China, Psycho-education and Counseling Center, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

  • Shuiyuan Xiao ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    xiaosy@csu.edu.cn (SYX); liuhaihong9@csu.edu.cn (HHL)

    Affiliations Mental Health Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China, Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China

  • Haihong Liu ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    xiaosy@csu.edu.cn (SYX); liuhaihong9@csu.edu.cn (HHL)

    Affiliation Mental Health Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China

  • Pierre Chue

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the distribution of sexual orientation among Chinese university students and identified the socio-demographic factors associated with sexual orientation. For the present study, we administered a paper-based, 5-point, self-report, sexual orientation scale to a stratified, random sample of 9071 undergraduates across all 10 universities in Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, China. Multivariable ordinal regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between demographic factors and sexual orientation. A total of 8320 respondents completed the survey. Of 8182 valid respondents, 80.6% self-reported as exclusively heterosexual, 12.6% self-reported as mostly heterosexual, 5.4% self-reported as bisexual, 0.7% self-reported as mostly homosexual, and 0.8% self-reported as exclusively homosexual. About one fifth of male students and one fourth of female students reported some degree of divergence from exclusive heterosexuality. This indicates that in China there are a large number of university students who are potentially involved in same-sex sexual attraction.

Introduction

Sexual orientation largely emerges in adolescence and stabilizes in early adulthood [1] and represents a subjective internal experience which plays a crucial role in the construction of an individual’s self-concept [2]. Sexual orientation, together with culture, plays a role in moderating sex differences in personality traits and occupational preferences [35]. Burgeoning research indicates that, compared with exclusively heterosexual undergraduates, students who report other sexual orientation are at higher risk of mental disorders and unhealthy behaviors and experience discrimination, victimization, stigmatization and prejudice [6]. The sexual orientation of youth has attracted interest in many countries, such as the United States of America (USA) and China. In the USA, sexual orientation questions have been added to statewide public health surveillance [7]. In China, sexual orientation of the youth has been described in mass media and in fictional literature but has been largely ignored by the scientific literature. The only study we found was published by Guo et al [8], which evaluated a sample of 22,288 youth aged from 15 to 24 years. The participants were rural and urban residents including university students [8]. In the study by Guo et al., sexual orientation was defined as sexual identity and assessed by three discrete categories: heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual [8]. The present study is the first to identify the sexual orientation of China’s 37 million undergraduates and is the first to use a measure that reflects the perspective that sexuality lies on a continuum [2, 9].

This paper presented reports on sexual orientation in a large sample of undergraduates across all 10 universities in the Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center (HEMC). Demographic characteristics are purported to be associated with sexual orientation attitudes [10], so the socio-demographic factors and their association with sexual orientation were also analyzed.

Methods

A stratified random sampling design was used in this study. Firstly, we obtained the number of undergraduates of each university and the percentage of 121,181 undergraduates of the all 10 universities. Secondly, the target sample size was set as 10,000, and the percentages were used to calculate each university's sample size. Thirdly, randomized sampling was performed at class-level (about 30 students in a class) for each university. Fourthly, the final sample of 9071 university students was obtained. A self-administered questionnaire was given to 9,071 (7.5%) of 121,181 undergraduates across all 10 universities in HEMC in the fall semester of 2015 in Guangzhou, China. The 10 universities are Sun Yat-sen University, South China University of Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou University, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts and Xinghai Conservatory of Music. Students of these 10 universities are from all over the country. A total of 8,320 (91.7% of 9,071) students filled in the questionnaires and 8,182 of them responded to the question on sexual orientation, yielding a response rate of 90.2% and a refusal rate of 9.8%. The laboratory protocol was deposited in protocols.io with a digital object identifier link (http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.pcrdiv6).

Informed consent was given verbally by participants at the beginning of the survey outside of school hours. The consent document was read out and any questions on the survey's purpose, content, confidentiality, participant's rights, benefit and risk were answered immediately and discussed. There were no incentives to join the survey and participants were able quit at any time without any risk. Participation was completely voluntary and all personal information was kept strictly confidential for the purpose of the study. The consent procedure and the study were approved by the Ethics Committee, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University.

Self-reported sexual orientation was measured using a single item on a 5-point scale with the instruction, "Please circle a number on the line scale which best describes your sexual orientation, 1 indicates exclusively heterosexual, 5 indicates exclusively homosexual” [S1 Supporting Information].

Statistical analysis was firstly used to describe the demographic characteristics of the total sample by self-reported sexual orientation among undergraduate students in Guangzhou, China. Secondly, Chi-square tests were used to determine the association between the demographics and sexual orientation. Thirdly, after the assumption of proportional odds was tested by using Test of Parallel Lines (p>0.05), multivariable ordinal regression analysis was used for examining the association between demographic variables and self-reported sexual orientation. The results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Of the 8,182 valid questionnaires, 3,894 (47.6%) were male, 4,147 (51.0%) were female, and 141 (1.4%) did not report their gender. The average age of participants was 19.8 (SD = 1.38) years, with a range of 15 to 29 years. The proportions of freshman, sophomore, junior and senior was 32.4%, 30.1%, 25.8% and 11.7%, respectively. 52.8% of the sample were majoring in Humanities and Social Sciences, 47.2% were majoring in Natural Sciences (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographics of the total sample by self-reported sexual orientation among undergraduate students in Guangzhou, China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201817.t001

A total of 80.6% respondents self-reported as exclusively heterosexual, 12.6% self-reported as mostly heterosexual, 5.4% self-reported as bisexual, 0.7% self-reported as mostly homosexual, and 0.8% self-reported as exclusively homosexual. The reported sexual orientation of males and females was significantly different. Compared with females, males reported higher rate of exclusively heterosexual (88.8% vs. 73.1%) and exclusively homosexual (1.0% vs. 0.6%) orientation. Students who did not report their gender reported the lowest rate of exclusively heterosexual (72.8%) and highest rate of exclusively homosexual (1.8%) orientation (Table 1).

Multivariable ordinal regression revealed that the students without siblings (OR = 1.44, 95% CI, 1.09–1.92 for male; OR = 1.36, 95% CI, 1.14–1.62 for female) or who were not living with parents prior to university (OR = 0.79, 95% CI for male, 0.63–0.99; OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75–0.99 for female) showed a positive association with same-sex sexual attraction. Female students of lower age groups and from a metropolis, and male students majoring Humanities and Social Sciences (OR = 1.50, 95% CI, 1.19–1.90) were positively associated with same-sex sexual attraction (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Multivariable ordinal regression analysis examining the association between socio-demographic variables and sexual orientation among undergraduate students in Guangzhou, China.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201817.t002

Discussion

This study indicates that self-reported sexual orientation of university students in China is distributed along a continuum. About one fifth of male students and one fourth of female students self-reported some degree of divergence from exclusive heterosexuality. The proportion of students self-reported as non-exclusively heterosexual was 5 times higher than that of the 2013 US National Health Interview Survey, which involved a sample of 34,557 adults aged 18 and over [11]. Among the non-exclusively heterosexual, the prevalence of exclusively homosexual orientation was similar to a national survey in China for a target age group of 15–24, which was 0.79% [8], but much lower than that of a similar US sample, which was 3.7%; the average age of this sample was 19.8 years [12]. The results imply that in China there are a large number of university students who self-report as non-exclusively heterosexual, which may influence their attitude on same-sex sexual behaviors.

In recent years, same-sex related sexual activities have been increasingly reported as a risk factor of HIV infection in China. A report released by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China indicates that among young students who are infected with HIV, the proportion attributed to men who have sex with men (MSM) had increased from 58.5% in 2008 to 81.6% in 2014 [13]. Furthermore, in a study of a sample of 1824, 33.8% of male university students who reported having had sex with a man at least once, also had female partners [14]. In these studies, the men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) might be subsumed under the MSM category, and they had distinct sexual risk behaviors from men who have sex with men only (MSMO) [15, 16]. In contrast to Friedman et al’s finding of little evidence to support substantial viral bridging behavior [15], data from National HIV Behavioral Surveillance and 20 US cities showed MSMW may play a potential role in bridging the transmission of HIV to heterosexual women [1719].

Homosexual orientation, either exclusively or not exclusively, may result in high psychosocial stress to students. There are a few studies that have reported excessive suicidal behavior, depressive and anxiety disorders, and substance use among homosexual students, which may be the result of socio-cultural pressures and intrapersonal conflicts related to their sexual orientation [2022]. When homosexual students choose to disclose their sexual identity, they have to cope with the socio-cultural stress of homophobic prejudice, social rejection, discrimination, and harassment [23]. Conversely, when they choose not to reveal their sexual identity, their relationships may be based on fear of discovery and duplicity, which can cause insecurity, social withdrawal, and demoralization [23].

This study indicates that being an only child, not living with parents prior to going to university, being female, being younger, being from a metropolis, and majoring in Humanities and Social Sciences (if male) are factors positively related to non-exclusive heterosexuality, i.e. somewhat attracted to the same sex. Previous studies showed that acceptable and/or normal view of homosexuality was associated with living in urban area, higher economic status, higher education level, student status, greater sexual and reproductive health knowledge, preference for Western movies/videos, open attitudes regarding family values, gender roles and premarital sex, and having had same-sex sexual contact [10, 2426]. It suggests that young students with one or more of these characteristics may have greater likelihood of regarding homosexuality as normal and/or acceptable, and this may influence their attitude towards and disclosure of sexual orientation. However, it is still unclear how sexual orientation, particularly homosexual orientation develops among adolescents and young adults not only in China, but in other countries.

Limitations

Participants of this study was recruited from the 10 universities of HEMC of Guangzhou. Although the students come from all over the country, there is limited generalizability to Chinese university students as a whole. In addition, there was a refusal rate of 9.8% to the question of sexual orientation, and the lowest rate of exclusively heterosexual (72.8%) and highest rate of exclusively homosexual (1.8%) orientation in the students who did not report their gender. It may suggest a bias on self-reporting, and sexual minorities may be more likely to omit/avoid responses to the question of sexual orientation.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that of 8182 valid respondents, 80.6% self-reported as exclusively heterosexual, 12.6% self-reported as mostly heterosexual, 5.4% self-reported as bisexual, 0.7% self-reported as mostly homosexual, and 0.8% self-reported as exclusive homosexual. About one fifth of male students and one fourth of female students reported some degree of divergence from exclusive heterosexuality. This indicates that in China there are a large number of university students who are potentially involved in same-sex sexual attraction.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the students of the ten universities in Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center who participated in the study. The authors also thank the teachers and instructors who allowed us access.

References

  1. 1. Moser C. Defining sexual orientation. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45:505–508. pmid:26408011
  2. 2. Talley AE, Stevens JE. Sexual orientation self-concept ambiguity: Scale adaptation and validation. Assessment. 2017;24:632–645. pmid:26643117
  3. 3. Lippa RA. Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(3):619–636. pmid:18712468
  4. 4. Zheng L, Lippa RA, Zheng Y. Sex and sexual orientation differences in personality in China. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(3):533–541. pmid:21080048
  5. 5. Bogaert AF, Ashton MC, Lee K. Personality and sexual orientation: Extension to asexuality and the HEXACO Model. J Sex Res. 2017:1–11. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:28276935
  6. 6. Saewyc EM. Research on adolescent sexual orientation: Development, health disparities, stigma and resilience. J Res Adolesc.2011;21:256–272. pmid:27099454
  7. 7. VanKim NA, Padilla JL, Lee JG, Goldstein AO. Adding sexual orientation questions to statewide public health surveillance: New Mexico’s experience. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2392–2396. pmid:20966370
  8. 8. Guo C, Pang L, Zhang L, Chen G, Wang Z, Zheng X. Disparities of sexual orientations by sex and urban or rural residence among youth in China. Sex Health. Advance online publication: 2016. pmid:27537775
  9. 9. Savin-Williams RC. Sexual Orientation: Categories or Continuum? Commentary on Bailey et al. (2016). Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016;17(2):37–44. pmid:27113561
  10. 10. Feng Y, Lou C, Gao E, Tu X, Cheng Y, Emerson MR, et al. Adolescents' and young adults' perception of homosexuality and related factors in three Asian cities. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50:S52–S60. pmid:22340857
  11. 11. Ward BW, Dahlhamer JM, Galinsky AM, Joestl SS. Sexual orientation and health among U.S. adults: National Health Interview survey, 2013. Natl Health Stat Report. 2014;77:1–10.
  12. 12. Talley AE, Sher KJ, Steinley D, Wood PK, Littlefield AK. Patterns of alcohol use and consequences among empirically derived sexual minority subgroups. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73:290–302. pmid:22333337
  13. 13. National Health and Family Planning Commission Press Conference. [posted 2015 April 10; cited 2017 Jul 15]. http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/xcs/s3574/201504/bee348723e1343d9b6822366ac16bb25.shtml
  14. 14. Cong L, Ono-Kihara M, Xu G, Ma Q, Pan X, Zhang D, et al. The characterization of sexual behavior in Chinese male university students who have sex with other men: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:250. pmid:18647381
  15. 15. Friedman MR, Stall R, Plankey M, Shoptaw S, Herrick AL, Surkan PJ, et al. Stability of bisexual behavior and extent of viral bridging behavior among men who have sex with men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(4):903–912. pmid:27873033
  16. 16. Fernando D. Men who have sex with men and women (MSMW), biphobia and the CDC: A bridge ignored?! Prev Med. 2017;105:368–369. pmid:29056317
  17. 17. Joseph HA, Pan Y, Mendoza M, Harawa NT, Lauby J, Hosek SG, et al. HIV Acquisition and transmission potential among African American men who have sex with men and women in three U.S. cities. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(1):183–194. pmid:29124541
  18. 18. Shadaker S, Magee M, Paz-Bailey G, Hoots BE, NHBS Study Group. Characteristics and risk behaviors of men who have sex with men and women compared with men who have sex with men-20 US Cities, 2011 and 2014. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75 Suppl 3:S281–S287.
  19. 19. Raymond HF, Al-Tayyib A, Neaigus A, Reilly KH, Braunstein S, Brady KA, et al. HIV among men and heterosexual women in the United States: An ecologic analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75 Suppl 3:S276–S280.
  20. 20. Lourie MA, Needham BL. Sexual orientation discordance and young adult mental health. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46:943–954. pmid:27480273
  21. 21. Rutter TM, Flentje A, Dilley JW, Barakat S, Liu NH, Gross MS, et al. Sexual orientation and treatment seeking for depression in a multilingual worldwide sample. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:87–93. pmid:27466746
  22. 22. Lhomond B, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Michaels S. A multidimensional measure of sexual orientation, use of psychoactive substances, and depression: Results of a national survey on sexual behavior in France. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:607–619. pmid:23743831
  23. 23. Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:674–697. pmid:12956539
  24. 24. Svallfors S. Class and conformism: A comparison of four western countries. Eur Societies. 2005;7:255–286.
  25. 25. Eliason MJ, Hughes T. Treatment counselor's attitudes about lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered clients: Urban vs. rural settings. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39:625–644. pmid:15115216
  26. 26. Lambert EG, Ventura LA, Hall DE, Cluse-Tolar T. College students’ views on gay and lesbian issues: Does education make a difference. J Homosex. 2006;50:1–30.