Figures
Abstract
We previously used whole-genome sequencing and Tn5 transposon mutagenesis to identify 16 critical genes involved in the halotolerance of Halomonas beimenensis, a species in the phylum Proteobacteria. In this present study, we sought to determine if orthologous genes in another phylum are also critical for halotolerance. Virgibacillus spp. are halotolerant species that can survive in high-saline environments. Some Virgibacillus species are used in different aspects of food processing, compatible solute synthesis, proteinase production, and wastewater treatment. However, genomic information on Virgibacillus chiguensis is incomplete. We assembled a draft V. chiguensis strain NTU-102 genome based on high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) and used transcriptomic profiling to examine the high-saline response in V. chiguensis. The V. chiguensis draft genome is approximately 4.09 Mbp long and contains 4,166 genes. The expression profiles of bacteria grown in 5% and 20% NaCl conditions and the corresponding Gene Ontology (GO) and clusters of orthologous groups (COG) categories were also analyzed in this study. We compared the expression levels of these 16 orthologs of halotolerance-related genes in V. chiguensis and H. beimenensis. Interestingly, the expression of 7 of the 16 genes, including trkA2, smpB, nadA, mtnN2, rfbP, lon, and atpC, was consistent with that in H. beimenensis, suggesting that these genes have conserved functions in different phyla. The omics data were helpful in exploring the mechanism of saline adaptation in V. chiguensis, and our results indicate that these 7 orthologs may serve as biomarkers for future screening of halotolerant species in the future.
Citation: Chen Y-H, Shyu Y-T, Lin S-S (2018) Characterization of candidate genes involved in halotolerance using high-throughput omics in the halotolerant bacterium Virgibacillus chiguensis. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201346
Editor: Marie-Joelle Virolle, Universite Paris-Sud, FRANCE
Received: January 4, 2018; Accepted: July 13, 2018; Published: August 9, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The raw genome reads of V. chiguensis are available in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRR6371040. The transcriptome reads are available in the NCBI SRA under accession number SRR6371042 (5% NaCl) and SRR6371043 (20% NaCl).
Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract number (MOST-106-2321-B-002-008-).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The genus Virgibacillus belongs to the Bacillaceae family within the Firmicutes phylum [1]. The members of Virgibacillus have mostly been isolated from saline environments [1]. Thirty-nine species in the Virgibacillus genus have been validated and published in the NCBI database (NCBI database, 2017), whereas 381 other strains have non-validated species names. Virgibacillus alimentarius has been used for extracellular lipolytic enzyme purification [2], and Virgibacillus pantothenticus produces an extracellular thermostable serine alkaline protease [3].
Members of Virgibacillus can be found in different food products, such as fermented jeotgal, Dongcai, and fish sauce [4]. Like many halophilic and halotolerant bacteria, members of the Virgibacillus genus synthesize various types of compatible solutes. For instance, Virgibacillus salexigens, V. marismortui, V. halodenitrificans, and V. pantothenticus have been shown to produce ectoine, proline, glycine betaine, or glutamic acid in response to high salinity [5–9].
Currently, complete genomic sequences are available for 6 Virgibacillus species (NCBI database, 2017). For instance, the complete genome of Virgibacillus halodenitrificans PDB-F2, which is used for phenol degradation in wastewater treatment, has been analyzed [9]. Compatible solute synthesis and transport were further investigated by whole-genome sequencing [9]. Moreover, the production of an NaCl-activated extracellular proteinase was studied in Virgibacillus sp. SK37, which is popularly used in fish sauce production, and novel enzymes that can function in high-salt conditions were identified [10–12]. In addition, incomplete genomic contigs of Virgibacillus chiguensis strain CGMCC 1.6496 (FQXD01000000.1) were published on NCBI by the Joint Genome Institute. There are 63 contigs and 45 scaffolds for the CGMCC 1.6496 strain. The size of the CGMCC 1.6496 strain is 4.13 Mb with 3,858 annotated genes.
The genomic sequence of another halotolerant bacterium, Halomonas beimenensis NTU-111, which belongs to the phylum Proteobacteria, was obtained in our previous study and used to analyze its saline adaptation mechanism [13]. The H. beimenensis genome was sequenced using short and long reads of genomic sequence that were generated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to assemble a complete genome [13]. Based on the transcriptomic profiles and Tn5 transposon mutagenesis, sixteen halotolerance-related genes were identified, and the possible molecular mechanisms of saline adaptation were examined [13]. Orthologs of nqrA, trkA2, nadA, and gdhB have significant biological functions in sodium efflux, potassium uptake, hydrogen ion transport for energy conversion, and compatible solute synthesis, respectively [13]. Other genes, such as spoT, prkA, mtnN2, rsbV, lon, smpB, rfbC, rfbP, tatB, acrR1, and lacA, function in cellular signaling, quorum sensing, transcription/translation, and cell motility, which have also been shown to be critical for promoting halotolerance [13]. Therefore, we examined whether orthologs of these 16 genes in a different phylum also play a role in halotolerance.
In this study, we isolated Virgibacillus chiguensis strain NTU-102 (hereafter referred to as V. chiguensis), which was collected from the Chigu saltern of Taiwan, and its entire genome was sequenced using NGS. Furthermore, V. chiguensis gene expression profiles under various salt conditions were analyzed by transcriptome analysis. Seven of the 16 orthologs in V. chiguensis, including trkA2, smpB, nadA, mtnN2, rfbP, lon, and atpC, exhibited expression profiles identical to those in H. beimenensis, suggesting that these 7 orthologous genes have identical functions in different phyla. Based on these high-throughput data, several halotolerance-related V. chiguensis genes were highlighted.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strain and growth conditions
V. chiguensis was incubated in growth medium [5 g/L yeast extract (Bacto, BD), 5 g/L casamino acids (Bacto, BD) and 5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O (Wako), pH 7.5] at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm. For the halotolerant evaluation, the bacteria were incubated with various NaCl concentrations (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%) in the growth medium. To monitor the V. chiguensis concentration, a spectrophotometer (Libra S4, Biochrom) was used to measure three replicates per condition at OD600 every 6 h until 48 h.
Genomic DNA and total RNA extraction and whole-transcriptome sequencing
For genomic DNA extraction, the bacteria were growth in 5% NaCl with growth medium for 24 h (OD600 = 1.0), and the Qiagen Gentra Puregene Kit (Qiagen) was used for DNA preparation. For transcriptome analysis, total RNA was extracted from bacterial cultures grown in 5% NaCl and 20% NaCl by a Total RNA Purification Kit (Geneaid). Genomic DNA and transcriptome sequencing were performed using Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300) paired-end sequencing by Genomics, BioSci & Tech Co.
Genomic DNA assembly, gene prediction, annotation, gene comparison, and phylogenetic tree analysis
The draft genome sequence of V. chiguensis was de novo assembled by the Velvet Assembler v1.2.09 with default parameters [14]. For gene prediction, Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST; version 2.0) on the PARTIC platform (www.patricbrc.org/portal/portal/patric/Home) was used to annotate gene name and function [15, 16]. In addition, the genome GC content was predicted by PARTIC. tRNAscan [17] and RNAmmer [18] were used for transfer RNA (tRNAs) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) prediction. BLAST2GO (version 3.3.5) with default settings was used for Gene Ontology (GO) analysis [19], and NCBI’s COG database (version 2014) (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) [20] was used for clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) analysis. Four Virgibacillus spp., including V. halodenitrificans, V. necropolis, Virgibacillus sp. SK37, and Virgibacillus sp. LM2416, were used for ortholog group clustering by OrthoMCL (orthomcl.org/orthomcl/) [21] to assess the gain and loss of genes in V. chiguensis. Furthermore, the ortholog groups from various phyla, such as Bacillus subtilis (CP021889), H. beimenensis (CP021435), Escherichia coli (NC_000913), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NC_002516), were compared with V. chiguensis to understand their similarities.
16S rRNA was used for phylogenetic tree analysis. The genus of Virgibacillus was compared by the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstraps via MEGA v7 (Kumar et al., 2016). Virgibacillus spp. include V. alimentarius (GU202420.1), V. campisalis (GU586225.1), V. halotolerans (HE577174.1), V. natechei (JX435821.1), V. byunsanensis (FJ357159.1), V. zhanjiangensis (FJ425904.1), V. carmonensis (AJ316302.1), V. necropolis (AJ315056.1), V. siamensis (AB365482.1), V. litoralis (FJ425909.1), V. salinus (FM205010.1), V. subterraneus (FJ746573.1), V. halophilus (AB243851.1), V. soli (EU213011.1), V. sediminis (AY121430.1), V. xinjiangensis (DQ664543.1), V. kekensis (AY121439.1), V. marismortui (AJ009793.1), V. salarius (AB197851.2), V. olivae (DQ139839.3), V. proomii (AJ012667.1), V. pantothenticus (D16275.1), V. dokdonensis (AY822043.1), V. chiguensis strain NTU-101 (NR044086.1), V. halodenitrificans (AY543169.1), V. albus (JQ680032.1), and V. koreensis (AY616012.1). Bacillus subtilis (AJ276351.1) was selected as the outgroup in this phylogenetic tree.
Transcriptome data processing and differential gene expression analysis
The transcriptome reads of the 5% and 20% NaCl samples were mapped to the genome draft sequence of V. chiguensis by Bowtie2 (version 2.2.5) [22] for gene expression analysis. The eXpress software (version 1.5) was used to calculate expression, which was presented as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) values [23]. We set the absolute value of the log2 fold-change (log2FC) in FPKM as greater than 2 for differential expression. The transcriptome database of V. chiguensis was constructed in the ContigViews system (www.contigviews.bioagri.ntu.edu.tw).
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
qRT-PCR was performed to confirm the gene expressions of the transcriptome patterns of V. chiguensis in 5% and 20% NaCl. The primers that were used in this study were designed using the GenScript Real-time PCR Primer Design system (www.genscript.com/tools/real-time-pcr-tagman-primer-design-tool). The sequences of the primer sets are listed in S1 Table.
Results and discussion
Growth conditions and phylogenetic position of V. chiguensis
V. chiguensis could survive in concentrations of NaCl between 0% and 20% (Fig 1A). We found that V. chiguensis had a higher growth rate in 5% NaCl (0.11) than at the other NaCl concentrations between 9 h and 19 h, whereas no detectable growth was observed in 25% NaCl (Fig 1B). In addition, a lag phase of V. chiguensis in 0%, 5%, and 10% was observed at 9.4 h, whereas the phase in 15% and 20% conditions was later then 13.4 and 43.2 h, respectively (Fig 1C). V. chiguensis exhibited a fast growth rate in 5% NaCl, whereas the bacteria were inhibited at > 20% NaCl (Fig 1A and 1D). Moreover, there were no significant differences in maximal biomass under 5%, 10%, and 15% conditions at 48 h (Fig 1D). Thus, V. chiguensis can be classified as a moderately halophilic bacterium because it exhibits halotolerance at 10 to 20% NaCl and its optimal growth condition is 5% NaCl.
(A) Growth curves of V. chiguensis in 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% (w/v) NaCl medium. (B) The slope of the growth curve of V. chiguensis between 9 and 19 h in the various NaCl concentrations. (C) The length of the lag phase for V. chiguensis growth under different NaCl conditions. (D) The OD600 concentration of V. chiguensis under various NaCl conditions at 48 h.
The phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA showed that V. chiguensis was closely related to V. chiguensis strain NTU-101 and V. dokdonensis, with 99.5% identity (Fig 2). Notably, NTU-102 and NTU-101 were isolated from the same location.
The 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree for Virgibacillus spp. was generated by the neighbor-joining method with Juke-Cantor correction. Bootstrap = 1,000. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Genomic features of V. chiguensis
The draft genomic contigs of V. chiguensis were de novo assembled by Velvet Assembler V1.2.09 with 3,719,926 reads. In total, we obtained 536 contigs of genomic DNA, with 103 contigs longer than 10,000 bp (Fig 3A). Sixty-five contigs were 1,000 to 10,000 bp, whereas the lengths of 37 contigs were 500 to 1,000 bp (Fig 3A). In addition, 101 contigs were 100 to 500 bp, and 230 contigs were smaller than 100 bp (Fig 3A). In general, 96% of genes were found on contigs longer than 1 kb (Fig 3B). In addition, 84 contigs were 10 kb– 50 kb in length, containing 2,181 genes (Fig 3A and 3B). We removed contigs shorter than 1,000 bp and used the remaining contig sequences (> 1 kb) to generate the draft genome of V. chiguensis (Fig 3A and 3B; S1 Dataset). The draft genome of V. chiguensis was 4,094,375 bp in length, and the largest contig was 272,869 bp. The N50-value was 42,585 bp. Furthermore, a total of 4,166 coding sequences (CDSs) were spread across the positive strand (2,136 CDSs) and negative strand (2,031 CDSs), and the genome was predicted to contain 3 rRNAs and 51 tRNAs. The average GC content was 36.58%. For comparison, the genomes size of the CGMCC 1.6496 strain is 4.13 Mb, with 3,787 CDS, similar to the values for V. chiguensis strain NTU-102, suggesting that our sequencing results are credible.
(A) The contig length distribution of Virgibacillus chiguensis. The x-axis represents the number of contigs. The y-axis represents the contig length range. Bp, base pair. (B) The gene number distribution of Virgibacillus chiguensis. The x-axis represents the number of genes. The y-axis represents the contig length range. Bp, base pair.
A total of 484 orthologous genes were detected in Virgibacillus spp., including orthologs of genes from V. halodenitrificans, V. necropolis, Virgibacillus sp. SK37, and Virgibacillus sp. LM2416 (Fig 4A). V. chiguensis contains 598 unique genes and lacks 644 genes that are present in the 4 other Virgibacillus spp. (Fig 4A). A total of 1,643 genes are shared between V. chiguensis and either H. beimenensis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, or B. subtilis. By contrast, there are 574 unique genes in V. chiguensis (Fig 4B).
(A) Venn diagram showing the gain and loss of genes between V. chiguensis and four Virgibacillus spp.: V. halodenitrificans, V. necropolis, Virgibacillus sp. SK37, and Virgibacillus sp. LM2416. (B) Venn diagram showing the gain and loss of genes between V. chiguensis and four other species, including Halomonas beimenensis (CP021435), Escherichia coli (NC_000913), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NC_002516), and Bacillus subtilis (CP021889). The distributions of the 9 orthologous halotolerant-related genes in V. chiguensis and H. beimenensis are indicated on the Venn diagrams.
GO and COG analysis
Based on the gene annotation, 3,037 genes with 10,567 hits in the NCBI nr database (each gene may be assigned more than one GO term) were assigned to three GO categories (Fig 5A). In the “cellular components” category, there were 103 sub-categories with 2,123 hits (Fig 5A); in the “molecular function” category, there were 829 sub-categories with 3,939 hits (Fig 5A); and in the “biological process” category, there were 685 sub-categories with 4,504 hits (Fig 5A). The genes in the cellular components category were assigned to sub-categories that included “integral component of membrane” (873 genes), “cytoplasm” (272 genes), and “plasma membrane” (195 genes) (Fig 5A). The genes in the molecular functions category were assigned to sub-categories that included “ATP binding” (358 genes), “DNA binding” (288 genes), and “metal ion binding” (128 genes) (Fig 5A). Moreover, the genes in the biological processes category were assigned to sub-categories that included “regulation of transcription, DNA-templated” (299 genes), “oxidation-reduction process” (251 genes), and “transport” (112 genes) (Fig 5A). The details of the GO sub-categories and gene information are listed in S2 Dataset.
(A) The top 5 GO sub-categories for DEGs of V. chiguensis. The pink bars represent up-regulated DEGs (log2FC of FPKM > 2); the blue bars represent down-regulated DEGs (log2FC of FPKM < −2); the gray bars represent DEGs that did not significantly change. (B) The top 5 clusters of COG categories for the DEGs of V. chiguensis.
Based on the sequence homology, a total of 4,043 genes were mapped to 22 different COG categories (Fig 5B). The top three mapped COG categories were “Amino acid transport and metabolism” (365 genes), “Transcription” (320 genes), and “Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis” (292 genes). Overall, these 3 categories accounted for 24.17% (977 of 4,043 genes) of the annotated COG functional dataset (Fig 5B). The details of the COG sub-categories and gene information are listed in S2 Dataset.
Transcriptome profiles of V. chiguensis
The transcriptome profiles of V. chiguensis grown in 5% and 20% NaCl were used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The transcriptome reads obtained from bacteria grown in 5% (7,493,634 reads) and 20% (7,507,500 reads) NaCl were compared to the genomic sequence to determine the mapping rate and to perform FPKM calculations. Our data indicated that approximately 95.49% (5% NaCl) and 96.94% (20% NaCl) of the transcriptome reads were mapped to the draft genomic sequence. The transcriptome data are available on the ContigViews system [24].
We identified 783 DEGs (457 up-regulated genes and 326 down-regulated genes) showing a log2FC in FPKM > 2 between the 5% and 20% NaCl conditions (Fig 6). The top GO and COG categories, with the corresponding number of DEGs, are highlighted in Fig 5.
The up-regulated DEGs are represented by pink columns showing log2FC of FPKM was > 2; the down-regulated DEGs are represented by blue columns showing log2FC of FPKM was < -2; the not significantly changed genes are represented by gray columns showing log2FC of FPKM did not exceed 2. The numbers indicate the number of genes.
The top three GO cellular component sub-categories of the genes up-regulated in 20% NaCl were “integral component of membrane” (128 genes), “cytoplasm” (34 genes), and “plasma membrane” (31 genes), whereas the top three sub-categories of the genes down-regulated in 20% NaCl were “integral component of membrane” (48 genes), “cytoplasm” (16 genes), and “plasma membrane” (10 genes) (Fig 5A). The top three GO molecular function sub-categories of the genes up-regulated in 20% NaCl were “ATP binding” (46 genes), “DNA binding” (21 genes), and “ATPase activity” (14 genes), whereas the top three sub-categories of the genes down-regulated in 20% NaCl were “ATP binding” (22 genes), “protein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-sugar phosphotransferase activity” (16 genes), and “metal ion binding” (14 genes) (Fig 5A). Moreover, the top three GO biological process sub-categories of the genes up-regulated in 20% NaCl were “DNA-templated regulation of transcription” (23 genes), “transport” (22 genes), and “oxidation-reduction process” (20 genes), whereas the top three sub-categories of the genes down-regulated in 20% NaCl were “oxidation-reduction process” (43 genes), “phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system phosphotransferase activity” (26 genes), and “DNA-templated regulation of transcription” (20 genes) (Fig 5B). The details of the GO sub-categories and gene information are listed in S2 Dataset.
The up-regulated genes were classified into 19 COG functional categories (S2 Dataset), the top five of which were “amino acid transport and metabolism” (44 genes), “inorganic ion transport and metabolism” (37 genes), “cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis” (34 genes), “cell motility” (31 genes), and “transcription” (30 genes) (Fig 5B). In addition, the genes that were down-regulated in 20% NaCl were classified into 18 COG functional categories (S2 Dataset). The top five were “carbohydrate transport and metabolism” (53 genes), “energy production and conversion” (38 genes), “amino acid transport and metabolism” (34 genes), “lipid transport and metabolism” (25 genes), and “transcription” (23 genes) (Fig 5B). The details of the COG sub-categories and gene information are listed in S2 Dataset.
Expression profiles of halotolerant-related genes in V. chiguensis
Our previous study of H. beimenensis identified 16 genes involved in halotolerance [13]. Here, we searched for orthologous V. chiguensis genes and identified 9 orthologs, including the potassium transporter gene trkA2, tmRNA-binding protein smpB, quinolinate synthetase gene nadA, 5'-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase gene mtnN2, undecaprenyl-phosphate galactose phosphotransferase gene rfbP, (p)ppGpp synthetase/guanosine-3',5'-bis(diphosphate) 3'-diphosphatase gene spoT, ATP-dependent protease gene lon, PrkA family serine protein kinase gene prkA, and ATP synthase gene atpC (S1 File).
Orthologs of genes such as trkA2, atpC, and nadA have significant biological functions in halotolerance, controlling potassium uptake, hydrogen ion transport for energy conversion, and compatible solute synthesis [13]. Other genes such as spoT, prkA, mtnN2, lon, smpB, and rfbP also have critical functions in promoting halotolerance, including cellular signaling, quorum sensing, translation, and cell motility.
The orthologous genes, such as lon, mtnN2, rfbP, and spoT, were blasted in all five Virgibacillus species (Fig 4A). Genes including prkA, nadA, smpB, and atpC were blasted in V. chiguensis, V. necropolis, and Virgibacillus sp. LM2416 (Fig 4A). The ortholog trkA2 was only blasted in V. chiguensis and Virgibacillus sp. LM2416 (Fig 4A). Moreover, in different phyla, the ortholog prkA was blasted in V. chiguensis, B. subtilis, H. beimenensis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa (Fig 4B). Seven orthologous genes, i.e., lon, rfbP, nadA, smpB, atpC, spoT, and trkA2, were blasted in V. chiguensis, H. beimenensis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa (Fig 4B). However, the ortholog mtnN2 was blasted in V. chiguensis, H. beimenensis, and E. coli (Fig 4B). These results indicate that some of halotolerant-related genes are conserved in different species and even in different phyla. Notably, the cutoff value for blasting against OrthoMCL proteins is e-5 and 50% match. If the best OrthoMCL protein is below the threshold, the protein will not be assigned to any ortholog group from the database.
The transcriptome profile showed that 7 of these 9 V. chiguensis genes were up-regulated in 20% NaCl (Fig 7). Compared to the expression profiles in H. beimenensis, the gene expression profiles in V. chiguensis were quite similar, except for those of prkA and spoT (Fig 7). Notably, the gene expression of spoT in V.chiguensis did not differ significantly between the two conditions (Fig 7). In V. chiguensis, the expression of prkA was up-regulated, whereas it was down-regulated in H. beimenensis (Fig 7). These data strongly suggest that 7 of the 9 identified orthologous genes, including trkA2, smpB, nadA, mtnN2, rfbP, lon, and atpC, are involved in halotolerance in a different phylum. The gene expression of these 9 genes was validated by qRT-PCR, and the results were agreed with the NGS transcriptome patterns (Fig 7).
Genes related to halotolerance included the potassium transporter gene (trkA2), tmRNA-binding protein (smpB), quinolinate synthetase gene (nadA), 5'-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase gene (mtnN2), undecaprenyl-phosphate galactosephosphotransferase gene (rfbP), (p)ppGpp synthetase/guanosine-3',5'-bis(diphosphate) 3'-diphosphatase gene (spoT), ATP-dependent protease gene (lon), PrkA family serine protein kinase gene (prkA), and ATP synthase gene (atpC).
In H. beimenensis, rfbP and mtnN2 mutants affect swarming ability [13]. rfbP encodes an undecaprenyl-phosphate galactose phosphotransferase [13], whereas mtnN of V. cholera encodes a 5'-methythioadenosine nucleosidase for the quorum-sensing pathway [13]. The atpC and trkA2 genes encode subunit epsilon of ATP synthase and are involves in potassium uptake, respectively, which are related to energy production [13]. SmpB forms a tmRNP complex to monitor trans-translation [13]. NadA is involved in compatible solute biosynthesis [13], whereas Lon plays roles in homeostasis for halotolerance [13]. These genes are critical for the halotolerance of H. beimenensis [13]. Therefore, these 7 genes may also be used as marker genes or indicators for screening halotolerant species.
Conclusion
Our draft genome and transcriptome profiles results demonstrated that omics data are helpful in exploring saline adaptation mechanisms and could be used to identify potential halotolerance-related enzymes in V. chiguensis in the future. Moreover, the data indicated that the profiles of the 7 halotolerant genes under high-saline conditions might be similar in V. chiguensis and H. beimenensis. Therefore, we propose that the 7 halotolerant marker genes identified in H. beimenensis could be used to screen new halotolerant species.
Supporting information
S1 Dataset. The sequences of the Virgibacillus chiguensis contigs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201346.s001
(TXT)
S2 Dataset. Gene annotation of Virgibacillus chiguensis and gene expression profiles under different NaCl concentrations.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201346.s002
(XLSX)
S1 File. Nine figures of the alignment results of 9 identified orthologous genes that are involved in halotolerance in V. chiguensis and H. beimenensis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201346.s003
(PDF)
S1 Table. Primer sets of Virgibacillus chiguensis for qRT-PCR.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201346.s004
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The National Center for High-Performance Computing, National Applied Research Laboratories provided computing power for this project.
References
- 1.
Sánchez-Porro C, de la Haba RR, Ventosa A. The genus Virgibacillus. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, editors. The Prokaryotes: Firmicutes and Tenericutes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. p. 455–65.
- 2. Dueramae S, Bovornreungroj P, Enomoto T, Kantachote D. Purification and characterization of an extracellular lipolytic enzyme from the fermented fish-originated halotolerant bacterium, Virgibacillus alimentarius LBU20907. Chemical Papers. 2017;71(10):1975–84.
- 3. Gupta A, Joseph B, Mani A, Thomas G. Biosynthesis and properties of an extracellular thermostable serine alkaline protease from Virgibacillus pantothenticus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24(2):237–43.
- 4. Guan L, Cho KH, Lee JH. Analysis of the cultivable bacterial community in jeotgal, a Korean salted and fermented seafood, and identification of its dominant bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2011;28(1):101–13. pmid:21056781
- 5. He J, Wang T, Sun JQ, Gu LF, Li SP. Isolation and characteristic of a moderately halophilic bacterium accumulated ectoine as main compatible solute. Acta Microbiol Sin. 2005;45(6):900–4.
- 6. Kuhlmann AU, Bursy J, Gimpel S, Hoffmann T, Bremer E. Synthesis of the compatible solute ectoine in Virgibacillus pantothenticus is triggered by high salinity and low growth temperature. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(14):4560–3. pmid:18487398
- 7. Kuhlmann AU, Hoffmann T, Bursy J, Jebbar M, Bremer E. Ectoine and hydroxyectoine as protectants against osmotic and cold stress: uptake through the SigB-controlled betaine-choline- carnitine transporter-type carrier EctT from Virgibacillus pantothenticus. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(18):4699–708. pmid:21764932
- 8. Reuter K, Pittelkow M, Bursy J, Heine A, Craan T, Bremer E. Synthesis of 5-hydroxyectoine from ectoine: crystal structure of the non-heme iron(II) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase EctD. PloS one. 2010;5(5):e10647. pmid:20498719
- 9. Zhou Y, Sun ZY, Li H, Qian CJ, Wu X, Tang HZ, et al. Investigation of compatible solutes synthesis and transport of Virgibacillus halodenitrificans PDB-F2 with complete genome analysis. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2017;122(Supplement C):165–72.
- 10. Phrommao E, Rodtong S, Yongsawatdigul J. Identification of novel halotolerant bacillopeptidase F-like proteinases from a moderately halophilic bacterium, Virgibacillus sp. SK37. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110(1):191–201. pmid:20955191
- 11. Sinsuwan S, Rodtong S, Yongsawatdigul J. NaCl-activated extracellular proteinase from Virgibacillus sp. SK37 isolated from fish sauce fermentation. J Food Sci. 2007;72(5):C264–9. pmid:17995713
- 12. Sinsuwan S, Rodtong S, Yongsawatdigul J. Characterization of Ca2+-activated cell-bound proteinase from Virgibacillus sp. SK37 isolated from fish sauce fermentation. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2008;41(10):2166–74.
- 13. Chen YH, Lu CW, Shyu YT, Lin SS. Revealing the saline adaptation strategies of the halophilic bacterium Halomonas beimenensis through high-throughput omics and transposon mutagenesis approaches. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13037. pmid:29026163
- 14. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455–77. pmid:22506599
- 15. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC genomics. 2008;9:75. pmid:18261238
- 16. Snyder EE, Kampanya N, Lu J, Nordberg EK, Karur HR, Shukla M, et al. PATRIC: the VBI PathoSystems Resource Integration Center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Database issue):D401–6. pmid:17142235
- 17. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(5):955–64. pmid:9023104
- 18. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100–8. pmid:17452365
- 19. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2005;21(18):3674–6. pmid:16081474
- 20. Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D261–9. pmid:25428365
- 21. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert JCJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL-DB: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(suppl_1):D363–D8. pmid:16381887
- 22. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. pmid:22388286
- 23. Roberts A, Pachter L. Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments. Nat Methods. 2013;10(1):71–3. pmid:23160280
- 24. Liu LY, Tseng HI, Lin CP, Lin YY, Huang YH, Huang CK, et al. High-throughput transcriptome analysis of the leafy flower transition of Catharanthus roseus induced by peanut witches'-broom phytoplasma infection. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55(5):942–57. pmid:24492256