Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Infant CPAP for low-income countries: An experimental comparison of standard bubble CPAP and the Pumani system

  • Markus Falk,
  • Snorri Donaldsson,
  • Thomas Drevhammar

Fig 2 is incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Design and dimensions of the revised Pumani.

Fresh gas flow is supplied to the breathing circuit at the bifurcation. The patient is connected to the prongs and gas can leave the system through leakage at the patient, the two bleed ports and at the bubble bottle (right side). Internal diameters (ID) were estimated by the authors. Blue circle 1–6 indicate cutpoints used to determine tube resistance. A simplified illustration of the revised Pumani components is provided in Fig 1 (bottom).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201083.g001

Reference

  1. 1. Falk M, Donaldsson S, Drevhammar T (2018) Infant CPAP for low-income countries: An experimental comparison of standard bubble CPAP and the Pumani system. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0196683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196683

Citation: Falk M, Donaldsson S, Drevhammar T (2018) Correction: Infant CPAP for low-income countries: An experimental comparison of standard bubble CPAP and the Pumani system. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0201083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201083

Published: July 17, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Falk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.