Figures
The images in Fig 1 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as A should be labeled as B, and the image that appears as B should be labeled as A. The authors have provided a corrected version below.
Calling activity of (A) Boana bischoffi and (B) B. leptolineata.
There is an error in the caption for Fig 4, “Effects of traffic noise on call parameters of the two hylids.” Where it is written “(±SD)”, it should read “(±SE)”. Please see the corrected Fig 4 caption here.
Graphs show call parameter means (±SE) at the four periods of time inside a playback, P1 (pre–stimuli, silence), N1 (noise1), N2 (noise2), P2 (post–stimuli, silence). Dashed line represents the playback order N1 (75dB) followed by N2 (65dB) and solid line the other way around N1 (65dB) and N2 (75dB). During road noise treatments, Boana bischoffi decreased call rate (A). Peak frequency was significantly different for B. bischoffi, decreasing from period P1 to P2 (C). Call duration showed changes in B. leptolineata depending on the order of the treatment (E). Letters “a” and “–b” indicate statistically different values due to treatments (intensity) or playback periods, and “*” indicate differences due to playback type/order (65 or 75dB first).
Reference
- 1. Caorsi VZ, Both C, Cechin S, Antunes R, Borges-Martins M (2017) Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical hylid frogs. PLoS ONE 12(8): e0183342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183342 pmid:28854253
Citation: Caorsi VZ, Both C, Cechin S, Antunes R, Borges-Martins M (2018) Correction: Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical hylid frogs. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0197632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197632
Published: May 17, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Caorsi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.