Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

The longitudinal association between changes in lung function and changes in abdominal visceral obesity in Korean non-smokers

  • Eun Kyung Choe,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Hae Yeon Kang ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    joybell77@hanmail.net

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Young Lee,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Veterans Medical Research Institute, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Seung Ho Choi,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Hee Joung Kim,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯
  • Joo Sung Kim

    Roles Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Internal Medicine, Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    ⨯

Abstract

Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, might be related to decreased lung function. We aimed to investigate whether obesity indices are associated with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in asymptomatic non-smokers through a longitudinal cohort study. The clinical records of 1,145 subjects (428 males, mean age 52.3 years) who underwent a comprehensive health evaluation, including spirometry and abdominal fat computed tomography, at least twice between 2007 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and analysed. The mean follow-up period was 1,105 days (over 3.0 years). The baseline total adipose tissue (TAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were inversely associated with both FEV1 and FVC (P < 0.05). The longitudinal study found that increasing TAT and VAT were significantly related to decreasing FEV1 and FVC, whereas decreasing TAT and VAT were related to increasing FEV1 and FVC in both males and females (P < 0.05). The strength and consistency of these associations were clearer in males than in females. However, no significant relationship was found between changes in subcutaneous adipose tissue and changes in lung function. In Korean non-smokers, longitudinal changes in abdominal visceral fat were found to be inversely related to changes in lung function over a mean period of three years. These results suggest that decreasing abdominal visceral obesity could increase lung function despite ageing.

Citation: Choe EK, Kang HY, Lee Y, Choi SH, Kim HJ, Kim JS (2018) The longitudinal association between changes in lung function and changes in abdominal visceral obesity in Korean non-smokers. PLoS ONE 13(2): e0193516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193516

Editor: Fernando Wehrmeister, Federal University of Pelotas, BRAZIL

Received: June 2, 2017; Accepted: February 4, 2018; Published: February 23, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Choe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; CT, computed tomography; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; IL, interleukin; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; TAT, total adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue

Introduction

Obesity is associated with many health-related problems, including respiratory diseases [1,2]. Several studies have suggested that obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, is related to decreased pulmonary function [3–7]. However, previous studies have used body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and abdominal height as surrogate markers for abdominal adiposity because it is difficult to directly measure the abdominal fat distribution [4,5,8].

Fat tissue has been measured precisely through magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy radiography absorptiometry, and computed tomography (CT). Abdominal adiposity consists of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Compared with SAT, VAT is known to secrete cytokines and growth factors that stimulate the development of obesity-related pathological conditions [9,10]. The fat tissue compartment that is more strongly associated with pulmonary function remains unclear due to limited data. In a previous cross-sectional study in Korea, the amount of adipose tissue, TAT, SAT, or VAT, was inversely related to lung function among non-smokers [3]. In one study, visceral fat was negatively correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in non-diabetic men [6]. However, previous studies included only a small number of subjects or had cross-sectional designs. Consequently, the results are inconsistent regarding the association between abdominal obesity and pulmonary function [3,6,7].

Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between abdominal obesity indices and pulmonary function with baseline data and to determine whether changes in abdominal obesity are associated with changes in pulmonary function in asymptomatic non-smokers through a longitudinal cohort study.

Methods

Study population

We performed a retrospective cohort study. The clinical records of 3,181 consecutive subjects who received a comprehensive health evaluation, including spirometry and abdominal fat CT, at least twice between January 2007 and December 2014 at the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center were reviewed. The subjects who visited our centre were self-recruited through routine health check-ups. In most cases, the examinations and tests were performed on the same day. We excluded 2,036 subjects who were current or former smokers or had a history of lung cancer, tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or abnormal liver or kidney function. Finally, 1,145 subjects were enrolled in the study and subjected to further analysis. The study data included information provided by a questionnaire, anthropometric assessment results, laboratory data, and abdominal adipose tissue areas measured by CT. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB No. H-1505-043-670). The board waived informed participant consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Measurements

The laboratory evaluation included total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fasting glucose and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Venous blood samples were collected before 10 AM after a 12-hour overnight fast. Height (cm) and body weight (kg) were measured using a digital scale. The BMI (kg/m2) was calculated as the weight divided by the height squared, and the WC was measured at the midpoint between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest by a well-trained nurse [11]. According to the International Obesity Task Force recommendation (WHO Western Pacific Region, 2000), the BMI categories were modified as follows: below-normal (< 23 kg/m2), overweight (between 23 and 25 kg/m2), and obese (> 25 kg/m2) [12,13]. Never-smokers were selected based on a self-administered medical questionnaire.

The subjects were examined in the supine position with a 16-detector row CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 16; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). The adipose tissue area was measured using a CT software programme (Rapidia 2.8; INFINITT, Seoul, Korea) that electronically determines the adipose tissue area in cm2 by setting the attenuation values for a region of interest within a range of -250 to -50 Hounsfield units, as previously described [14]. In summary, the TAT area was calculated using the region of interest drawn around the outer margin of the dermis. The VAT area was defined as intraabdominal fat bound to the parietal peritoneum or transverse fascia using a manual tracking method with cursors. The SAT area was defined as superficial fat in the abdominal and back muscles [14]. Spirometric tests were performed according to the American Thoracic Society recommendations by experienced technicians [15]. A dry rolling seal spirometer was used (Model 2130, Viasys Respiratory Care, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC were measured and are expressed as both absolute values (L) and predicted values (%) calculated from the formula based on the Korean population [3,16].

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation in Table 1. We used linear regression and linear mixed models to predict the FVC and FEV1 from abdominal adiposity. Because no standard values exist to define a normal quantity of abdominal adipose tissue, we divided the baseline abdominal adiposity into four groups according to the tissue area (cut-off values in quartiles (cm2); male TAT 209.6, 264.5, 317.9; male SAT 105.9, 127.7, 160.8; male VAT 93.9, 129.9, 163.8; female TAT 198.3, 256.1, 321.5; female SAT 133.1, 171.8, 213.1; female VAT 53.9, 81.0, 112.5) to evaluate the relationship between abdominal obesity and pulmonary function, as shown in Table 2. All statistical analyses were performed separately according to gender because obesity values, pulmonary function values and other independent variables are significantly different between males and females. A multivariate analysis was used to control for the influence of age and other possible factors that may influence lung function.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Baseline and follow-up characteristics of the subjects according to gender.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193516.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Associations between baseline obesity indices and baseline lung function.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193516.t002

The longitudinal association between abdominal obesity and lung function was evaluated with the use of linear mixed models, as shown in Table 3. Model 1 was adjusted for baseline age, height, weight, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, glucose, TG, HDL-cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and follow-up period. For model 2, significant variables were selected from model 1 using the likelihood ratio test based on the maximum likelihood method. In Fig 1, VAT changes were stratified into five groups according to their longitudinal changes (cut-off values in quintiles of VAT change (cm2): males, -24.0, -6.6, 4.7, 17.2; females, -14.1, -3.2, 4.8, 15.0) to determine whether changes in abdominal fat were associated with changes in pulmonary function. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and R statistical software, version 3.2.2. (R development Core Team; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Statistical significance was established for two-sided P-values < 0.05.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Changes in lung function according to changes in visceral adiposity.

Longitudinal changes in FEV1 and FVC in quintiles of VAT change in males (circles) and females (diamonds). The middle quintile was used as a reference. Quintiles 1–2 include subjects with VAT loss, whereas quintiles 4–5 include individuals with VAT gain. The analysis was adjusted for baseline age, height, weight, WC, systolic BP, and fasting glucose, TG, HDL cholesterol, CRP level, and the follow-up period. Cut-off values in the quintiles of VAT change (cm2): males, -24.0, -6.6, 4.7, 17.2; females, -14.1, -3.2, 4.8, 15.0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193516.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Longitudinal associations between abdominal obesity and lung function using a linear mixed model.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193516.t003

Results

Baseline and follow-up characteristics of the study population

The baseline and follow-up characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. A total of 1,145 subjects (428 males, baseline mean age 52.3 ± 8.6 years) were analysed in this study. The mean follow-up period was 1,105 days (over 3.0 years, 217–2,199 days). The baseline median BMI and WC values among males and females were 24.2 kg/m2 and 87.0 cm and 22.2 kg/m2 and 80.9 cm, respectively. The proportions of male subjects characterised as below-normal, overweight, and obese were 28.6%, 34.4%, and 37.0%, respectively. Additionally, the proportions of female subjects defined as below-normal, overweight, and obese were 63.1%, 22.6%, and 14.3%, respectively. During the follow-up period, the BMI and WC decreased in 53.0% and 54.1% of the subjects, respectively, compared with the baseline values. Although the TAT of the abdomen in males (266.4 cm2) was similar to that in females (261.7 cm2), the VAT/SAT ratio differed: specifically, the ratios were 0.99 in males and 0.49 in females. The baseline FVC and FEV1 values were 4.23 ± 0.63 L and 3.42 ± 0.55 L in males and 3.03 ± 0.45 L and 2.48 ± 0.40 L in females, respectively. The baseline FEV1/FVC in males and females was 80.8 ± 6.1% and 81.9 ± 6.1%, respectively.

Association between baseline obesity indices and baseline lung function

The relationships between baseline obesity indices and baseline lung function are displayed in Table 2. In males and females, the baseline TAT and VAT values were inversely associated with both the FEV1 and FVC. However, baseline SAT was not related to lung function. In females, the BMI was directly associated with the FVC. The baseline obesity indices were not associated with the FEV1/FVC ratio.

Association between changes in abdominal obesity and changes in lung function

A study to investigate the association between changes in abdominal obesity and changes in lung function was performed (Table 3). With an approximately three-year follow-up, changes in lung function were inversely related to changes in adiposity. In model 1, after adjusting for the follow-up period, baseline age, height, weight, WC, systolic blood pressure (BP), and fasting glucose, TG, HDL cholesterol, and CRP levels, an association was found between changes in visceral adiposity and changes in lung function in the multivariate analysis. In models 1 and 2, longitudinal changes in TAT and VAT were inversely associated with changes in FEV1 and FVC in both males and females. However, SAT was not associated with FVC or FEV1 in either model 1 or 2.

Fig 1 illustrates the relationship between changes in visceral adiposity and changes in lung function. VAT changes were stratified into five groups according to their longitudinal changes to determine whether changes in abdominal fat were associated with changes in pulmonary function. In subjects with increased VAT, lung function was deteriorated, whereas lung function was improved in those with reduced VAT. This pattern was observed in both genders, but the strength and consistency of these associations were more obvious in males than in females.

Discussion

In this study, lung function was significantly associated with abdominal obesity, particularly visceral fat, in asymptomatic non-smokers after adjusting for variables. Over a three-year period, increased visceral adiposity was associated with decreased lung function, whereas decreased visceral adiposity was associated with improved lung function in both males and females. There were no statistically significant relationships between changes in SAT and changes in lung function. In this retrospective cohort study, the mean follow-up results, such as the mean BMI, WC, and cholesterol, triglyceride, and HbA1c levels, were improved compared with the baseline metabolic values, particularly in males. This phenomenon was due to annual health check-ups and management despite ageing, but it is unclear why this trend was not observed in females, although one possible explanation could be the complex effects of menopause [17].

Several mechanisms have been suggested for how obesity affects lung function. Respiratory function is influenced by the interaction between the lungs, chest wall, and respiratory muscles. Abdominal obesity is known to reduce chest wall compliance, respiratory muscle function, and peripheral airway size [5,18–20]. Obesity is also known to have a greater effect on the FVC, which represents the lung volume, and a lesser effect on the FEV1, which represents expiration flow rates. A previous study showed that higher WC and BMI values are associated with significantly lower FVC values, but these values are only slightly associated with FEV1 values [5]. The mechanical effects of the intraabdominal pressure on the diaphragm have been suggested as an important reason for the relationship between central obesity and lung function. However, our data showed no significant association between the baseline BMI or WC and lung function, except the BMI in females. In the present study, a lower baseline BMI was associated with a significantly lower FVC in females. This finding might be due to the larger proportion of thin females in our study, and poorer lung function in thin body types might be due to a lower muscle mass [21]. In fact, this result confirms the limitations of the BMI and WC as measures of obesity. The BMI does not distinguish between muscle and fat and inaccurately predicts the percentage of body fat [22]. In addition, WC is predominantly an index of subcutaneous abdominal fat and not visceral fat [23]. Higher baseline TAT and VAT values, but not SAT values, were found to be associated with significantly lower FVC and FEV1 values in our study, which is consistent with previously reported data [6]. Therefore, our data showed that central obesity, particularly visceral obesity, has a greater effect on lung function than general obesity. This result was confirmed through a longitudinal study, which showed that changes in lung function were inversely associated with changes in TAT and VAT.

Another possible explanation for the relationship between lung function and obesity is the systemic inflammation triggered by adipose tissue. VAT is well known to be more metabolically active than SAT. VAT secretes or synthesises inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin (IL)-6 [9,24,25]. In some studies, VAT and IL-6 were found to be related to CRP levels [26–28]. Elevated CRP or IL-6 levels are known to be associated with chronic inflammatory airway disease [3,29,30]. Furthermore, activated macrophages in adipose tissue are known to cause low-grade chronic inflammation [31–33]. A previous observational study showed that systemic inflammation was related to reduced lung function in non-smoking males [34]. Considering these data, our results showing the relationship between visceral adiposity and lung function could be accepted in terms of systemic inflammation.

A previous study showed that decreased adiposity is associated with increased lung function to a greater degree in males than females [35]. This pattern was observed in the present study, and the strength and consistency of these associations were more obvious in males than in females. These results can be explained by mechanical aspects: males have more abdominal fat than females, with a similar degree of obesity [35–37]. A greater deposit of fat in the abdominal region generates greater resistance to diaphragmatic contraction, disturbing ventilation mechanics [38]. In addition, several other possible explanations have been suggested, including differences in sex hormone levels, thresholds for the harmful effects of pulmonary irritants, or differences in the airway calibre between males and females [39,40]. In the present study, lung function was found to be influenced by VAT, and the gap between males and females was presumed to be due to the high VAT/SAT ratio in males.

The present study has several strengths. First, this was a longitudinal cohort study, unlike most of the previous cross-sectional studies of lung function and obesity. Second, this study included a relatively large number of participants in whom abdominal adipose tissue was directly measured with CT scans, unlike previous studies that used the BMI or WC as surrogate markers for abdominal adiposity. Third, our subjects were relatively healthy homogeneous participants. In addition, we included only non-smokers to eliminate any influences of previous or current smoking.

However, our study has several limitations. First, the subjects of this study were self-recruited for routine health check-ups, and this study was conducted in one centre. Therefore, our findings might not represent the general population. Second, although significant associations were found, the approximately three-year follow-up period was not sufficiently long to identify the long-term relationships between changes in obesity indices and lung function. Whether these changes are maintained long-term requires further investigation. Third, this study included relatively few obese people, particularly obese females. Thus, the relationship between lung function and abdominal obesity might be different for very obese persons. The implication of this study is that even in those who are not significantly overweight, decreasing abdominal fat may be effective in increasing pulmonary function. Further research is required for people who are very obese.

Conclusions

In conclusion, increased abdominal visceral obesity is associated with decreased lung function (FVC and FEV1), whereas decreased abdominal visceral obesity is related to increased lung function in Korean non-smokers. This could be important information for planning lung function screenings and health check-up follow-ups for subjects with abdominal obesity. In addition, abdominal visceral obesity must be prevented and improved in asymptomatic subjects to also improve pulmonary function and metabolic disease. However, a long-term prospective cohort study simultaneously measuring cytokines and proinflammatory mediators produced by adipocytes might be helpful for identifying certain causal or temporal relationships between lung function and abdominal obesity.

References

  1. 1. Chen Y, Breithaupt K, Muhajarine N. Occurrence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among Canadians and sex-related risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53: 755–761. pmid:10941954
  2. 2. Chen Y, Dales R, Tang M, Krewski D. Obesity may increase the incidence of asthma in women but not in men: longitudinal observations from the Canadian National Population Health Surveys. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155: 191–197. pmid:11821241
  3. 3. Park YS, Kwon HT, Hwang SS, Choi SH, Cho YM, Lee J, et al. Impact of visceral adiposity measured by abdominal computed tomography on pulmonary function. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26: 771–777. pmid:21655063
  4. 4. Ochs-Balcom HM, Grant BJ, Muti P, Sempos CT, Freudenheim JL, Trevisan M, et al. Pulmonary function and abdominal adiposity in the general population. Chest. 2006;129: 853–862. pmid:16608930
  5. 5. Chen Y, Rennie D, Cormier YF, Dosman J. Waist circumference is associated with pulmonary function in normal-weight, overweight, and obese subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85: 35–39. pmid:17209174
  6. 6. Thijs W, Alizadeh Dehnavi R, Hiemstra PS, de Roos A, Melissant CF, Janssen K, et al. Association of lung function measurements and visceral fat in men with metabolic syndrome. Respir Med. 2014;108: 351–357. pmid:24239315
  7. 7. Sutherland TJ, Goulding A, Grant AM, Cowan JO, Williamson A, Williams SM, et al. The effect of adiposity measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on lung function. Eur Respir J. 2008;32: 85–91. pmid:18353855
  8. 8. Leone N, Courbon D, Thomas F, Bean K, Jego B, Leynaert B, et al. Lung function impairment and metabolic syndrome: the critical role of abdominal obesity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179: 509–516. pmid:19136371
  9. 9. Samaras K, Botelho NK, Chisholm DJ, Lord RV. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue gene expression of serum adipokines that predict type 2 diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18: 884–889.
  10. 10. Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2000;21: 697–738. pmid:11133069
  11. 11. Choi SH, Kang HY, Choi SY, Kim MN, Yang JI, Chung SJ, et al. Colorectal adenoma is associated with coronary artery calcification in a Korean population. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242: 515–520. pmid:26298744
  12. 12. Kang HT, Lee HR, Lee YJ, Linton JA, Shim JY. Relationship between employment status and obesity in a Korean elderly population, based on the 2007–2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;57: 54–59. pmid:23478160
  13. 13. Park SK, Ryoo JH, Oh CM, Choi JM, Kang JG, Lee JH, et al. Effect of overweight and obesity (defined by Asian-specific cutoff criteria) on left ventricular diastolic function and structure in a general Korean population. Circulation Journal. 2016;80: 2489–2495. pmid:27773890
  14. 14. Chung SJ, Kim D, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC, et al. Metabolic syndrome and visceral obesity as risk factors for reflux oesophagitis: a cross-sectional case-control study of 7078 Koreans undergoing health check-ups. Gut. 2008;57: 1360–1365. pmid:18441006
  15. 15. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26: 948–968. pmid:16264058
  16. 16. Choi JK, Paek D, Lee JO. Normal predictive values of spirometry in Korean population. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2005;58: 230.
  17. 17. Gurka MJ, Vishnu A, Santen RJ, DeBoer MD. Progression of metabolic syndrome severity during the menopausal transition. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5: e003609. pmid:27487829
  18. 18. Ray CS, Sue DY, Bray G, Hansen JE, Wasserman K. Effects of obesity on respiratory function. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;128: 501–506. pmid:6614644
  19. 19. Suratt PM, Wilhoit SC, Hsiao HS, Atkinson RL, Rochester DF. Compliance of chest wall in obese subjects. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984;57: 403–407. pmid:6469810
  20. 20. Rubinstein I, Zamel N, DuBarry L, Hoffstein V. Airflow limitation in morbidly obese, nonsmoking men. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112: 828–832. pmid:2378649
  21. 21. Jeon YK, Shin MJ, Kim MH, Mok JH, Kim SS, Kim BH, et al. Low pulmonary function is related with a high risk of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008–2011. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26: 2423–2429. pmid:25956284
  22. 22. Frankenfield DC, Rowe WA, Cooney RN, Smith JS, Becker D. Limits of body mass index to detect obesity and predict body composition. Nutrition. 2001;17: 26–30. pmid:11165884
  23. 23. Bosy-Westphal A, Booke CA, Blocker T, Kossel E, Goele K, Later W, et al. Measurement site for waist circumference affects its accuracy as an index of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous fat in a Caucasian population. J Nutr. 2010;140: 954–961. pmid:20335625
  24. 24. John BJ, Irukulla S, Abulafi AM, Kumar D, Mendall MA. Systematic review: adipose tissue, obesity and gastrointestinal diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23: 1511–1523. pmid:16696799
  25. 25. Lafontan M, Girard J. Impact of visceral adipose tissue on liver metabolism. Part I: heterogeneity of adipose tissue and functional properties of visceral adipose tissue. Diabetes Metab. 2008;34: 317–327. pmid:18550411
  26. 26. Cartier A, Cote M, Lemieux I, Perusse L, Tremblay A, Bouchard C, et al. Sex differences in inflammatory markers: what is the contribution of visceral adiposity? Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89: 1307–1314. pmid:19297456
  27. 27. Faber DR, van der Graaf Y, Westerink J, Visseren FLJ. Increased visceral adipose tissue mass is associated with increased C-reactive protein in patients with manifest vascular diseases. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212: 274–280. pmid:20494358
  28. 28. Fontana L, Eagon JC, Trujillo ME, Scherer PE, Klein S. Visceral fat adipokine secretion is associated with systemic inflammation in obese humans. Diabetes. 2007;56: 1010–1013. pmid:17287468
  29. 29. Kuhn C 3rd, Homer RJ, Zhu Z, Ward N, Flavell RA, Geba GP, et al. Airway hyperresponsiveness and airway obstruction in transgenic mice. Morphologic correlates in mice overexpressing interleukin (IL)-11 and IL-6 in the lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000;22: 289–295. pmid:10696065
  30. 30. Neveu WA, Allard JL, Raymond DM, Bourassa LM, Burns SM, Bunn JY, et al. Elevation of IL-6 in the allergic asthmatic airway is independent of inflammation but associates with loss of central airway function. Respir Res. 2010;11: 28. pmid:20205953
  31. 31. Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW. Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2003;112: 1796–1808. pmid:14679176
  32. 32. Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, et al. Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2003;112: 1821–1830. pmid:14679177
  33. 33. Suganami T, Ogawa Y. Adipose tissue macrophages: their role in adipose tissue remodeling. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88: 33–39. pmid:20360405
  34. 34. Lim SY, Rhee EJ, Sung KC. Metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and systemic inflammation as risk factors for reduced lung function in Korean nonsmoking males. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25: 1480–1486. pmid:20890430
  35. 35. Fenger RV, Gonzalez-Quintela A, Vidal C, Husemoen LL, Skaaby T, Thuesen BH, et al. The longitudinal relationship of changes of adiposity to changes in pulmonary function and risk of asthma in a general adult population. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14: 208. pmid:25532602
  36. 36. Bjorntorp P. Adipose tissue distribution and function. Int J Obes. 1991;15 Suppl 2: 67–81.
  37. 37. Enzi G, Gasparo M, Biondetti PR, Fiore D, Semisa M, Zurlo F. Subcutaneous and visceral fat distribution according to sex, age, and overweight, evaluated by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986;44: 739–746. pmid:3788827
  38. 38. Melo LC, Silva MA, Calles AC. Obesity and lung function: a systematic review. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2014;12: 120–125.
  39. 39. Rossi A, Fantin F, Di Francesco V, Guariento S, Giuliano K, Fontana G, et al. Body composition and pulmonary function in the elderly: a 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32: 1423–1430.
  40. 40. Chen Y, Rennie DC, Pahwa P, Dosman JA. Pulmonary function in adults with recent and former asthma and the role of sex and atopy. BMC Pulm Med. 2012;12: 32. pmid:22748064