Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Spreading dynamic of acute and carrier hepatitis B with nonlinear incidence

  • Tahir Khan,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir (Lower), Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan

  • Gul Zaman ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    gzaman@uom.edu.pk

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir (Lower), Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan

  • Ali Saleh Alshomrani

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Hepatitis B infection caused by the hepatitis B virus. It is one of the serious viral infection and a global health problem. In the transmission of hepatitis B infection different phases, i.e., acute and chronic carrier stages play an important role. The chronic carries individuals do not exhibit any symptoms and are able to transmit the infection. Here we assessed the transmissibility associated with different infection stages of hepatitis B and generated an epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate. In order to do this, first we formulate the model by splitting the infectious class into two subclasses, namely acutely infected and chronic carries with both horizontal and vertical transmission. The basic properties of the proposed model are presented. The basic reproductive number is obtained by using the next generation matrix approach. Biological sense of the threshold condition is investigated and discussed in detail. We also find the conditions to investigate all possible equilibria of the model in terms of the basic reproduction number. Finally, we perform numerical simulations to support our analytical work.

Introduction

Hepatitis B has different phases, such as acute and chronic carrier hepatitis. Acute hepatitis B refers to the first six months after exposed some one to hepatitis B virus. In this stage the immune system is usually able to clear the virus from the body and some one of the individual may be recovered within few months complectly. However, the remaining infection grows and leads to more serious stage called chronic stage or life long illness. Chronic carrier hepatitis B virus stays for long time inside the body and develop serious health problem. Individuals with carrier hepatitis often have no history of acute illness, but it can cause liver scarring which becomes the cause of liver failure [1].

Hepatitis B is a globally health problem and a leading cause of death in the world. Million of people are infected with hepatitis B virus infection among them about 2 millions individuals live chronically. So from these infected individuals including both chronic or acute every year approximately 780, 000 people dies [2]. Medical researchers also investigated that hepatitis B virus infection is responsible for about 80 percent of the primary liver cancer.

The virus can be transmitted in the community from one individual to another in different ways including sharing syringes, blood transfusion and unprotected sexual contacts etc. It is also transmitted to a new born baby from her infected mother at the time of birth known is vertical transmission. Most infected adults carry the capacity to overcome hepatitis B virus, however some adults and children are extremely vulnerable to this virus and develop acute infections. Although there is a vaccine and new techniques available in the market to prevent the transmission of hepatitis B virus, but recently still new cases are reported.

Several biologists and mathematicians have been developed different epidemic models for the transmission dynamic of infectious diseases in the population [315]. Currently different mathematical models have been developed to understand the transmission dynamics of hepatitis B in the community [1, 16, 17]. The incidence rate is one of the key concept and plays an important role in the study of mathematical modeling. The nonlinear incidence rate is more reasonable then bilinear incidence rate, especially in case of sexually transmittible diseases like hepatitis B and HIV etc. Bilinear incidence rate βSI frequently used in many epidemic models [18, 19], where β represents the contact rate, S represents susceptible individuals and I represents the infectious individuals. Nonlinear incidence rate used in [20], where β is the contact rate, S, I are susceptible, infected respectively and N represents the total population.

In this article, we develop a hepatitis B virus transmission model by incorporating the acute and chronic carrier infected subclasses with nonlinear incidence rate in the host population. In order to consider the acute infected and chronic carrier individuals with nonlinear incidence rate in the host population, the total population is divided into six epidemiological classes and retrieve a new mathematical model. First, we show the basic properties like positivity, boundedness and biological feasibility. Then, the reproduction number is investigated and discuss its sensitivity analysis. We also discuss the stability analysis at both disease free and endemic equilibrium by using linearzation, Lyapunov function theory and geometrical approach. Finally, results of numerical simulations are presented.

The paper is organized as follows: First section is devoted to introduction. In the second section, we formulated the proposed hepatitis B model. In the third section, we discussed the existence of positive solution and biologically feasibility of the proposed model. In fourth section, we obtained the basic reproductive number and discussed its sensitivity analysis. The fifth section is concerned to the stability analysis of the model. Finally in the sixth and seventh sections, numerical simulation and conclusion are presented, respectively.

Formulation of the hepatitis B model

In this section, we develop a hepatitis B virus transmission model with nonlinear incidence rate. According to the biological characteristic of hepatitis B virus, the total population N(t), is divided into six epidemiological subclasses, namely susceptible S(t), latent L(t), acutely infected A(t), chronic carrier infectious C(t), recovered with permanent immunity R(t) and vaccinated V(t). Keeping the characteristic of hepatitis B, we place the following assumptions on the model:

  1. Y1. The initial populations S(0), L(0), A(0), C(0), R(0) and V(0) are all known and non-negative.
  2. Y2. The inflow of new born with parentally infection goes to carrier compartment.
  3. Y3. The inflow of new born without parentally infection goes to susceptible compartment.
  4. Y4. The population with successful vaccination goes to the vaccinated compartment.
  5. Y5. Recovered individuals has a permanent immunity.
  6. Y6. The inflow of new born with successful vaccination goes to vaccination compartment.

The assumptions Y1Y6 lead to a mathematical model represented by the following system of seven differential equations: (1) with initial conditions

(2)

In the model (1), b represents the birth rate, ξ represents the birth rate without successful vaccination, η represents the proportion of prenatally infected individuals, ϕ shows the rate of waning vaccine induced immunity, β shows the transmission rate from susceptible to infected, γ represents the reduced transmission rate. d0 represents the death rate, which occur naturally. γ3 represents the vaccination rate. σ represents the moving rate from latent class to acute class. γ1 represents the moving rate from acute to chronic carrier. γ2 represents the moving rate of chronic carrier to immune. d1 represents the death rate, which occur from the hepatitis B and p represents the average probability of those individuals, who fail to recover in acute stage and goes to chronic carrier.

Basic mathematical properties

Proposition 1. For all t > 1 and the initial data S(0) > 0, L(0) ≥ 0, A(0) ≥ 0, C(0) ≥ 0, R(0) ≥ 0 and V(0) > 0, the solution (S, L, A, C, R, V) of model (1) are positive, whenever they exist.

Proof: Let φ1 = 1 − ηC(t), and I ⊂ [0, + ∞), then the first equation of system (1) can be written as

(3)

The assumption that the solution of the system (1) exists in the interval I, for all tI, the solution of Eq (3) look likes

(4)

Obviously the right hand side of Eq (4) is positive. Consequently S(t) > 0 for all tI.

The solution of the second equation of model (1) yields (5) which showing that L(t) ≥ 0. In a similar fashion, it can be shown that A(t) ≥ 0, C(t) ≥ 0, R(t) ≥ 0 and V(t) > 0. Hence the solution (S, L, A, C, R, V) of model (1) are positive for all t > 0, tI.

Proposition 2. The system (1) is a dynamical system in the biological feasible region given by

(6)

Proof: The differentiability of the right hand side of the system (1) implies that the existence of the unique maximal solution for any associated cauchy problem. Thus the initial value problem (1) is well posed and biologically feasible, because all the state variables are non-negative. So for the required result, it is sufficient to study the dynamics of the flow generated by the system (1). Furthermore, since the solutions of the system (1) are positive and bounded, it remains to show that the vector field defined by this system is transversal to the boundary of Ω on all its faces. The face corresponding to has direction (1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) and the inner product with the vector field is bξφ1 + ϕV(t) − βφ2S(t) − (d0 + γ3)S(t) ≤ bξφ1 − (d0 + γ3)S(t). Similarly, we can check for the faces L, A, C, R, V. At last, the face corresponding to has a direction (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) and the inner product with the vector field is bNd0N(t) − d1C(t) ≤ bNdN(t). Thus the vector field on these faces point toward the region Ω.

Basic reproduction number analysis

Computation of R0

In epidemiological models the role of basic reproduction number is a key concept and play a very important role. It represents the expected average number of new infections produced directly and indirectly by a single infective, when introduced into a completely susceptible population. To find the basic reproductive number for our proposed model (1), we follow Driessche and Watmough [21, 22]. Let us assume that, χ = (xi/i = 1…6)t, where x1 = L, x2 = A, x3 = C, x4 = S, x5 = R, x6 = V with each xi ≥ 0. We also define χ0 to be the set of all disease free states, such that X0 = {χ ≥ 0/xi = 0, im}. In order to find R0, then by the use of and the proposed model (1), yields that (7) where, (8) (9) (10) In Eqs (8)(10), Fi(χ), and represents the rate of appearance of new infections, the rate of transfer of individuals and the rate of transfer of individuals out of compartments, respectively. Since the hepatitis B virus transmission model (1) consist of non-negative initial conditions, thus we have the following conditions:

  1. A1. if χ ≥ 0, then Fi, , for i = 1…6.
  2. A2. if xi = 0, then . In particular, if xχ0, then for i = 1…m.
  3. A3. The incidence of infection for noninfected compartments is zero, i.e., Fi = 0, if i > m.
  4. A4. if xχ0, then Fi(χ) = 0 and for i = 1…m.
  5. A5. if Fi(χ) is set to zero, then all eigenvalues of have negative real parts.

Since the infected compartments are L, A and C, giving m = 3. An equilibrium solution with L = A = C = 0 has the form F0 = (S0, 0, 0, 0, 0, V0). Using q2 = d0 + σ, q3 = d0 + γ1, q4 = d0 + d1 + γ2bξηN, then without loss of generality, we obtain (11) gives

(12)

The basic reproduction number, R0, is the spectral radius, ρ, of next generation matrix , i.e., R0 = ρ(FV−1) = max{|λ1|,…, |λ3|}. Thus the basic reproduction number, R0, for our proposed model (1) takes the form i.e., R0 = γ01+ γ02, where γ01 and γ02 is defined by the following equation:

(13)

Sensitivity analysis of R0

Sensitivity analysis is recycled to define the relative significance of epidemic parameters to disease transmission and its dominance. It determines the robustness of model prediction to parameter values. Usually uncertainties in data collection and estimated values significantly affect the basic reproduction number.

Definition 1. The normalized sensitivity index of the basic reproduction number R0 that depends differentiability on a parameter Φ is defined as:

(14)

We perform the analysis by calculating the sensitivity indices of the basic reproduction number to the parameters in the model. These indices allow us to measure the relative change in basic reproduction number with the change in a parameter. Using these indices, we find the parameters that highly affect the basic reproduction number and necessity to be targeted by control strategies.

Table 1 shows that the parameters β, σ, ξ, η and ϕ have a positive influence in the rate of basic reproduction number. This describes that the growth or decay of these parameters say by 10 percent, then the basic reproduction number will increase or decrease by 10 percent, 9.0 percent, 5.46 percent, 5.46 percent and 8.13 percent, respectively as shown in Figs 16. But the index for parameters γ1 and γ3 illustrate, that increasing their values by 10 percent will decrease the values of basic reproduction number R0 by 8.24 percent, 7.38 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively shown in Figs 712.

thumbnail
Table 1. Sensitivity indices of R0 with respect to some chosen parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.t001

thumbnail
Fig 1. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses β and γ3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ1 and σ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ2 and σ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ3 and σ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses η and γ1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses η and γ3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ1 and ξ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ2 and ξ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g008

thumbnail
Fig 9. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ3 and ξ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g009

thumbnail
Fig 10. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ1 and ϕ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g010

thumbnail
Fig 11. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ2 and ϕ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g011

thumbnail
Fig 12. The sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number R0 verses γ1 and γ2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g012

In order to control the infection of hepatitis B, we focus to control the transmission of hepatitis B infection β, which has got highest sensitivity index 1. This means that decrease in transmission rate by 10 percent would decrease basic reproduction by 10 percent. The second highest sensitivity index is −0.8247 is that of recovery rate γ1. That is increasing γ1 by 10 percent will decrease basic reproduction number by 8.24 percent. The parameters σ, η, ξ and ϕ collectively have got the sensitivity index 2.8152. So decreasing these parameters by 10 percent causes collectively decreases basic reproduction number by 28.152 percent. Similarly the parameters γ1 and γ2, have got the sensitivity index 1.5623. So increasing the treatment of hepatitis B infected individuals (acutely and chronically) will decrease the basic reproduction number by 15.632 percent. Therefore, it is easy to develop a control strategy.

Steady state analysis

In order to study the dynamic of the model (1), we can reduce the proposed model by eliminating R(t); because R(t) appears only in the fifth equation of the proposed model, therefore we can discuss the following reduced system:

(15)

The reduced model (15) has a disease free equilibrium, which is denoted by F0 and define as F0 = (S0, 0, 0, 0, 0, V0), where

(16)

Similarly, the unique positive disease endemic state of the model (15) is denoted by F* and define as F* = (S*, L*, A*, C*, R*, V*), which exist only if R0 > 1. Using the values of qi for i = 1, 2, 3…5 are as q1 = d0 + γ3, q2 = d0 + σ, q3 = d0 + γ1, q4 = d0 + d1 + γ2bξηN and q5 = d0 + ϕ, the components of the disease endemic equilibrium F* takes the following form

(17)

Thus, we conclude that there is no disease endemic equilibrium, whenever R0 < 1 and a unique positive (or endemic) equilibrium, otherwise.

Stability analysis of DFE

To investigate the stability analysis of the disease free equilibrium point F0, we make use of the following results.

Theorem 1. If R0 < 1, then the disease free equilibrium point F0 = (S0, 0, 0, 0, 0, V0) is locally asymptotically stable and if R0 > 1 then it is unstable.

Proof: The Jacobian matrix of the model (15) at disease free equilibrium point F0 becomes

(18)

Using bi for i = 1, 2, 3, such that b0 = q2q3q4(1 − R0), b1 = q4(2d0 + σ + γ1) + q2q3(1 − γ01) and b2 = 2d0 + σ + q4. The characteristic equation of the Jacobian matrix (18) has the form

(19)

The fundamental theorem of algebra reveals that there are five roots of Eq (19). Hence, the Jacobian matrix J(F0) (18) has five eigenvalues. Clearly for R0 < 1, two eigenvalues of them are λ1 = −d0 and λ2 = −d0γ3ϕ among them has negative real parts. The remaining three eigenvalues are obtained by solving

(20)

Roots of Eq (20) have negative real parts, if the Routh-Hurwitz criterion (H1): b1 > 0, b0 > 0 and b1b2 > b0 holds, which implies that

(21)

Thus, it can be noted that (H1) holds if and only if R0 < 1. Therefore, by the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, all the eigenvalues have negative real parts, so F0 is locally asymptotically stable.

Theorem 2. If R0 < 1, the disease free equilibrium point F0 is globally asymptotically stable and unstable, if R0 > 1.

Proof: Let us construct the Lyapunov function (22) where ki for i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 are positive constants to be determined. Differentiating Eq (22) with respect to t and using the system (1), we obtain

(23)

By choosing the positive constants ki = (d0 + σ)(d0 + d1 + γ2bξηN) for i = 1, 2, 3, 5 and k4 = σβγS0, then Eq (23) reduce to the following equation

(24)

Eq (24) showing that, if R0 < 1, we have 0 < γ02 < 1, therefore is negative. Also if S = S0, L = L0, A = A0, C = C0, R = R0 and V = V0, thus the largest compact invariant set in Ω is the singleton set {F0}, so LaSalle’s invariant principle implies that, the disease free equilibrium point F0 is globally asymptotically stable.

Stability analysis of EE

To investigate the stability analysis of the endemic equilibrium point F*, we prove the following results.

Theorem 3. If R0 > 1, then the endemic equilibrium point F* = (S*, L*, A*, C*, R*, V*) is locally asymptotically stable and if R0 < 1 then it is unstable.

Proof: Using the elementary row transformation for the Jacobian matrix of the model (15) around F*, we obtain the following matrix (25) where

(26)

The eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix around the disease endemic equilibrium F* are

(27)

Clearly two eigenvalues of matrix (25) have negative real parts, i.e. λ1 < 0 and λ2 < 0, while λ3, λ4 and λ5 have negative real parts if and only if (28) which holds as F* exist. Therefore, all eigenvalues contains negative real parts, and we have the conclusion, that the endemic (disease) equilibrium point F* is locally asymptotically stable.

Theorem 4. If R0 > 1, then the endemic equilibrium point F* = (S*, L*, A*, C*, R*, V*) is globally asymptotically stable and unstable otherwise.

Proof: Let J and J∣2∣ be the Jacobian matrices and second additive compound matrix of the system containing only the first three equation of the model (1), which becomes

Let us consider the function which implies that then taking the time derivative, that is Pf(χ), we get

(29)

Now and . Thus we take , which can be written as (30) where

Let (b1, b2, b3) be a vector in R3 and its norm ‖.‖ defined by

(31)

Now we take the Lozinski measure (B) with respect to the above norm described by Martin et. al. in 1974 [23], that is (B) ≤ sup{g1, g2} = sup{(B11) + ‖B12)‖, (B22) + ‖B21‖}, where gi = (Bii) + ‖Bij)‖ for i = 1, 2 and ij, which implies that (32) where , , and ‖B21)‖ = max{σ, 0} = σ. Therefore g1 and g2 becomes, such that, and , which implies that Hence . Now integrating the Lozinski measure (B) with respect to t in the interval [0, t] and taking limt→∞, we obtain

(33)

So finally, we can write

Thus the system containing the first three equations of the model (1) is globally asymptotically stable around its interior equilibrium (S*, L*, A*). Further more the solution of the limiting system of the remanning subsystem gives that C(t) → C* and V(t) → V*. Hence F* = (S*, L*, A*, C*, R*, V*) is globally asymptotically stable.

Numerical simulation

In this section, the numerical simulations of the proposed model (1) are presented for the verification of analytical results. The numerical results are obtained by using the Runge-Kutta method of order four. The parameters value used in the simulation are given in Table 2, which are biologically feasible.

Moreover the time interval is taken 0–200 units, while the different initial population size for the compartmental population susceptible S(t), latent L(t), acutely infected A(t), chronic carries C(t), recovered R(t) and vaccinated individuals V(t) are presented in Table 2. By using the parameters value, non-negative initial population sizes and the time interval 0–200, we obtain the simulation Figs (13) to (18), which represents that there are always susceptible S(t) and vaccinated V(t) population, while the remaining individuals i.e., acutely infected A(t), chronic carrier C(t) and recovered R(t) vanishes. The trajectories of susceptible population S(t), latent population L(t), acutely infected population A(t), chronic carrier population C(t), recovered population R(t) and vaccinated population V(t) converges to the equilibrium points. Which ensure the stability of the proposed model. It is also be noted that our proposed model shows that the susceptible and acutely infected individuals are decreasing sharply, while the latent, chronic carrier, recovered and vaccinated individuals are increasing at the beginning and then decreasing after some time as shown in Figs (13) to (18).

thumbnail
Fig 13. The plot represents the time dynamics of the susceptible population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g013

thumbnail
Fig 14. The plot represents the time dynamics of the latent population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g014

thumbnail
Fig 15. The plot represents the time dynamics of the acutely infected population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g015

thumbnail
Fig 16. The plot represents the time dynamics of the chronic carrier population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g016

thumbnail
Fig 17. The plot represents the time dynamics of the recovered population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g017

thumbnail
Fig 18. The plot represents the time dynamics of the vaccinated population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191914.g018

Conclusion and discussion

In this article, we have established a model for the transmission dynamic of hepatitis B with nonlinear incidence by taking into account the classification of different phases of hepatitis B (acutely and chronically) septic individuals. We presented different mathematical analysis including positivity, boundedness and biological feasibility of the proposed model. We obtained the basic reproduction number by using the next generation matrix approach and then discussed its sensitivity analysis by normalized sensitivity index. Moreover, we discussed the stability analysis and showed that the proposed model is both locally as well as globally asymptotically stable for the disease free as well as for endemic equilibriums. For the local stability, linearization and Routh-Herwitz criteria have been used, while the global stability is retrieved by using Lyapunov function theory and geometrical approach. Finally, the numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis are presented to show the feasibility of the proposed work.

In future, we will consider the proposed model with spatial effect. We will also design the optimal control strategy on the basis of normalized sensitivity index of basic reproduction number to minimize the number of infected hepatitis B individuals and to maximize the number of noninfected individuals. Work on such issues are in progress and will be reported in a near future publication.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan under the project No. 20–1983/R and D/HEC/11 and the Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

References

  1. 1. Mann J, Roberts M. Modelling the epidemiology of hepatitis B in New Zealand. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2011; 21(269):266–272.
  2. 2. WHO, Hepatitis B. Fact sheet No. 204. Updated June 2014(http://www.who.int/meadiacenter/factsheet/fs204/en/index.html)(revised Agust 2014).
  3. 3. Zou L, Ruan S, Zhang W. On the sexual transmission dynamics of hepatitis B virus in China. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2015; 21(369):1–12.
  4. 4. Pang L, Ruan S, Liu S, Zhao Z, Zhang X. Transmission dynamics and optimal control of measles epidemics. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2015; 1(256):131–147.
  5. 5. Zaman G, Kang YH, Jung IH. Stability analysis and optimal vaccination of an SIR epidemic model. BioSystems. 2008; 30(93):240–249.
  6. 6. Zeb A, Zaman G, Momani S. Square-root dynamics of a giving up smoking model. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2013; 1(37):5326–5334.
  7. 7. Zaman G, Kang YH, Jung IH. Optimal treatment of an SIR epidemic model with time delay. BioSystems. 2009; 31(98):43–50.
  8. 8. Khan T, Zaman G. Classification of different Hepatitis B infected individuals with saturated incidence rate. SpringerPlus. 2016; 15(5):1082.
  9. 9. Khan T, Zaman G, Chohan MI. The transmission dynamic and optimal control of acute and chronic hepatitis B. Journal of Biological Dynamics. 2017; 1(11):172–189.
  10. 10. Mukherjee A, Mukherjee V. Solution of optimal power flow using chaotic krill herd algorithm. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 2015; 30(78):10–21.
  11. 11. Sun GQ, Zhang ZK. Global stability for a sheep brucellosis model with immigration. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2014; 1(246):336–345.
  12. 12. Li L. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete physiological control system. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2015; 1(252):397–404.
  13. 13. Sun GQ, Xie JH, Huang SH, Jin Z, Li MT, Liu L. Transmission dynamics of cholera: Mathematical modeling and control strategies. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2017; 30(45):235–244.
  14. 14. Li MT, Jin Z, Sun GQ, Zhang J. Modeling direct and indirect disease transmission using multi-group model. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 2017; 15(446):1292–1309.
  15. 15. Li L. Monthly periodic outbreak of Hemorrhagic Fever with renal syndrome in China. Journal of Biological Systems. 2016; 24(04):519–533.
  16. 16. Thornley S, Bullen C, Roberts M. Hepatitis B in a high prevalence New Zealand population: a mathematical model applied to infection control policy. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2008;7(254):599–603.
  17. 17. Zou L, Zhang W, Ruan S. Modeling the transmission dynamics and control of hepatitis B virus in China. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2010; 21(262):330–338.
  18. 18. Fan M, Li MY, Wang K. Global stability of an SEIS epidemic model with recruitment and a varying total population size. Mathematical Biosciences. 2001; 30(170):199–208.
  19. 19. Li J, Ma Z. Qualitative analyses of SIS epidemic model with vaccination and varying total population size. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2002; 1(35):1235–1243.
  20. 20. Lashari AA, Hattaf K, Zaman G, Li XZ. Backward bifurcation and optimal control of a vector borne disease. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences. 2013; 1(7):301–309.
  21. 21. Van den Driessche P, Watmough J. Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Mathematical Biosciences. 2002; 31(180):29–48.
  22. 22. Allen LJ, Brauer F, Van den Driessche P, Wu J. Mathematical epidemiology. Berlin: Springer; 2008.
  23. 23. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL. Dynamic optimization: the calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management. Courier Corporation; 2012.