Figures
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is an important pathogen which is often the cause of major morbidity and mortality in both hospital and community settings. For this reason, we investigated the host cell early immune resoponse to S. aureus infection using genome-wide analysis. To do this, we infected Mus musculus RAW264.7 cells with S. aureus alone or in the presence of free peptidoglycan (PG), which appears in the S. aureus cell wall. Post infection, we performed a genome-wide analysis of RAW246.7 cells to identify significant changes in the gene expression profile. Further, we analyzed the infected RAW246.7 cells with transmission electron microscopy looking for the presence of bacterial cells inside the host cell. We also used flow cytometry to determine whether cells had induced apoptosis. The results showed that S. aureus induced apoptosis in the RAW246.7 cells but did not effectively clear away intracellular bacteria cells. However, S. aureus + PG treatment inhibited the apoptosis and activated the host cell inflammation response, possibly involving NF-κB and JAK-STAT pathways, as identified by genome-wide analysis, in RAW246.7 cells. Our study demonstrated for the first time that an independent application of free PG was capable of activating immune responses the host cells.
Citation: Wang Z, Zhu F (2018) The expression profiles of immune genes in Mus musculus macrophages during Staphylococcus aureus infection. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190490
Editor: Johnson Rajasingh, University of Kansas Medical Center, UNITED STATES
Received: April 18, 2017; Accepted: December 17, 2017; Published: January 5, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Wang, Zhu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.
Funding: This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370050) to FZ.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: Bcl, B-cell lymphoma; Csf, colony stimulating factor; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HEPES, (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; Il, interleukin; Jak, Janus family kinases; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; Nfkb, nuclear transcription factor kappa-B; NLRP, NOD-like receptor protein; PG, peptidoglycan; STAT, Signal transducers and activators of transcription; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; TIRAP, Toll-interleukin 1 receptor adapter protein; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TLR, Toll-like receptors; TRADD, Tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1-associated DEATH domain
Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is an important nosocomial and community-acquired pathogen leading to human infections worldwide. Macrophages, part of the innate immune system, generally play a key role in host defense by recognizing, engulfing, and killing microorganisms [1]. However, S. aureus has developed an ability to escape the immune response of the host cells by inhibiting complement activation, blocking and destroying phagocytic cells and modifing host B cell and T cell responses [2]. A few studies have reported that S. aureus usually invade the host cells and persist intracellularly for varying periods of time in cell culture models [3–5]. Another study has reported that S. aureus can even survive in human epithelial cells for prolonged periods of time [6]. As a result, the survival of S. aureus within polymorphonuclear leukocytes might lead to prevention of macrophage efferocytosis and induce programmed necrosis [7]. Moreover, the intracellular persistence also provides S. aureus with an ideal strategy to escape professional phagocytes and promote recrudescent infection [4]. While interleukin-1 (IL-1) produced by phagocytes is an important cytokine orchestrating host defense against S. aureus [8], IL-1β is an important pro-inflammatory cytokine that activates monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils [9, 10]. Peptidoglycan (PG), a major component of the cell walls of gram-positive bacteria, can activate macrophages to phagocytose gram-positive bacteria through Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), which is recruited to phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens [11]. For phagocytosing S. aureus, PG must be particulated and internalized via phagocytosis [12]. However, this progress always be blocked by the components of S. aureus, so we used the free peptidoglycan to understand the early immune response against S. aureus. The peptidoglycan internalized via phagocytosis subsequently activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β secretion [12]. We also found that nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation is required for phagocytosis of staphylococcus aureus by RAW264.7 cells [13]. As phagocytosis is a rapid and very important antimicrobial mechanism for host defense, it is vital to uncover the early interaction partners between pathogenic bacteria and phagocyte cells. This remains an active area of study as many of the details about the early interactions between S. aureus and macrophages are still not fully understood. To investigate the early immune response against S. aureus in macrophages, we applied free peptidoglycan (PG) in an effort to activate cytokine secretion in RAW 246.7 cells, a murine macrophage cell line, and performed a genome-wide analysis study. We compared host cell immune responses between S. aureus infection and PG treatment. We confirmed that S. aureus + PG treatment inhibited S. aureus mediated apoptosis and activated the host cell inflammatory response, involving the NF-κB and JAK-STAT pathways.
Materials and methods
Strain and cell culture
The S. aureus strain ATCC25923, widely used for medical assays, was obtained from Honghui Hospital (Hangzhou, China) and grown overnight in Columbia medium (Oxoid, the UK) with 2% NaCl at 37°C. All Mus musculus RAW264.7 cells (Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China) were cultured in RPMI 1640 media (Hyclone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA), 10 mM HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) (Invitrogen, USA), 0.11 mg/mL sodium pyruvate (Sigma, USA), 0.002 M L-glutamine (Sigma, USA) and pen/strep (1 mg/mL, 100 U/mL) (Invitrogen). To activate the phagocytic activity of RAW264.7 cells, PG (Sigma) was sonicated for 1 h and then added to each well at a concentration of 1 μg/mL, and then pre-incubated for 5 h before being used for the further investigation. RAW264.7 cells were infected with S. aureus alone or in combination with PG.
Transmission electron microscopy
RAW264.7 cells were treated as described previously [14]. Sections of 100 nm thickness were cut in a Reichert Ultracut OMU3 microtome (Leica, Germany). This was followed by staining with uranyl acetate/70% methanol. Images were obtained using a Hitachi 7650 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) operating at 70 kV.
Microarray analysis
Total RNAs were extracted from either RAW264.7 cells (1×106) as such (control), treated with S. aureus alone or treated with S. aureus in the presence of PG, using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNAs were then subjected to the Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array GeneChip (CapitalBio Corp., CA, USA) for gene expression analysis. The raw microarray data obtained were subsequently analyzed using Bio MAS (molecule annotation system) 3.0 software (Capital Bio Corp.). Differentially expressed genes were screened and clustered at a fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 and p-value of ≤5%. Based on the DNA microarray data, the differently expressed genes were subsequently subjected to biological pathway analysis.
Induction and measurement of apoptosis
To examine apoptosis, RAW264.7 cells were either incubated with S. aureus alone or S. aureus +PG for 12 h. Following these treatments, the cells were labeled with Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated Annexin V and propidium iodide using an apoptosis kit (Invitrogen). Briefly, the cells were washed after harvesting and then suspended in a 900 μL cold Annexin-binding buffer containing 5 μL of Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated Annexin V and 10 μL of propidium iodide solution (250 μg/ml). The cells were then incubated in this solution for 15 min at room temperature. Later the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and fluorescent emissions were measured at 530 nm (FL-1) and >575 nm (FL-3) in triplicate.
Quantitative real-time RT–PCR
Total RNAs were extracted from RAW264.7 cells (1×106) with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Then the total RNAs were reverse transcribed to synthesize cDNAs using reverse transcriptase M-MLV (Takara, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using gene-specific primers and TaqMan probes (S1 Table). Relative gene expression levels were calculated according to a method described previously [14], using GAPDH as an internal control. Real-time PCR amplification reactions were carried out in a final volume of 20 μL, which contained 10 μL Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa), 1 μL diluted cDNA template, 7.2 μL dH2O, 0.3 μL of each TaqMan probe and 0.4 μL of each primer. PCR conditions were as follows, 95°C for 30 s, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s.
Statistical analysis
The data from three independent experiments were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance to calculate the mean and standard deviation of the triplicate assay. The significant differences between the treatments were determined using the Student’s t-test. Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Results
PG induced protection against S. aureus
The protective effect of PG against S. aureus infection to the RAW264.7 cells was first analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It was observed that the S. aureus treatment of RAW264.7 cells alone for 24 h resulted in their destruction and we observed large number of bacterial cells in the cytoplasm of RAW264.7 cells as indicated by the black arrow in Fig 1. Interestingly, 1 h incubation of RAW264.7 cells with S. aureus did not show any significant effect but we were still able to observe a few bacteria cells in their cytoplasm. In contrast, when S. aureus, bacterial cells were co-cultured with RAW264.7 cells, in the presence of PG, we observed a normal growth of RAW264.7 cells and there were only a few bacterial cells inside the cytoplasm even after an incubation period of 24 h. This data suggested that PG treatment induced an effective immune response against S. aureus infection in RAW264.7 cells.
The RAW264.7 cells were either not infected or infected with S. aureus alone or in combination with PG for two different time points. The upper panel shows the pictures by TEM after 1 h of S. aureus infection, while lower panel depicts the same after 24 h. Bar = 2 μm. Black arrow indicated the internalized S. aureus.
PG triggers immune response in RAW264.7 cells
Genome-wide analysis is a new approach that can be used to identify the host genes required for antibacterial immunity after specific treatment has been administered. In the current study, the genome-wide analysis of the Mus RAW264.7 cells in response to S. aureus infection was conducted using oligonucleotide microarray. The expression profiles of genes in the early response to S. aureus challenge showed that PG treatment altered the transcriptional response when compared with S. aureus alone and when compared with a no infection (control) as shown in Fig 2. Further detailed analysis revealed that S. aureus infection resulted in up-regulation of the expression levels of 6652 genes and down-regulation of 4257 genes (P<0.01), while S. aureus along with PG treatment significantly up-regulated 6588 genes and down-regulated 3796 genes (P<0.01). Following closer analysis of the data, it was observed that S. aureus and PG treatment together triggered many genes representing the host cell immune response and some other molecular pathways.
The gene expression profile analysis was performed using mouse DNA microarray chip using RNA isolated from RAW264.7 cells either treated with S. aureus or S. aureus + PG. Non-treated RAW264.7 cells were used as a control. Red signal indicates up-regulation of gene expression, while green signal depicts down-regulation.
Specifically, among the genes from the Toll pathway, the combination of S. aureus and PG pre-stimulation, resulted in the significant (P<0.05) upregulation of many genes like TLR1, TLR5, TLR9, Tollip, TIRAP and Pik3r5, as compared to S. aureus infection alone. In contrast, the expression levels of TLR3, TLR4 and Pik3r1 were significantly down-regulated (P<0.05) as shown in Table 1. Moreover, the expression levels of other important immune response related genes, including Il1a, Il1b, Bcl3, Il6, Il10, Il15, Nlrp3, Nfkb1, Nfkbiz, Nfkbie, Csf2, Csf3, Jak2, Stat3, Stat5a, Pik3r5, Cish and Socs3 were also significantly up-regulated in S. aureus +PG treatment at 1 h post incubation compared with S. aureus only (P<0.05, Table 2). Quantitative real-time RT–PCR analysis confirmed the same expression profile of these genes (Fig 3). Since, many of the up-regulated genes belong to the NF-κB and Jak-Stat pathways, it can be deduced that PG treatment might be playing an important role in activating these two pathways.
At 1 h after challenge with heat-inactivated S. aureus and heat-inactivated S. aureus + PG, the expression profiles of Jak2, Stat3, Stat5a, Csf1, Cish, IL-1a, IL-1b, Nfkb1, TNF-α and Bcl2 genes in RAW264.7 cells were characterized by quantitative real-time PCR. The GAPDH gene was used as a control. Statistically significant differences between treatments were indicated with asterisks (**, P<0.01).
Furthermore, we also looked at genes related to the apoptotic pathway and observed that S. aureus + PG treatment significantly up-regulated Bcl2, Bcl2l1, Bcl3, Casp4, TNF and Tnfrsf1b (P<0.05) expression, while significantly down-regulating the expression of Casp3, Casp7, Casp8, Casp9 and TRADD genes (P<0.05, Table 3).
PG antagonized S. aureus-induced apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells
In addition, we also analyzed the effect of PG on apoptosis induction by S. aureus through flow cytometric analysis. The data revealed that S. aureus induced apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells after 12 ho of treatment compared with the control cells. Interestingly, PG treatment resulted in the reversal of the S. aureus mediated apoptotic induction as shown in Fig 4A–4C. The percentage of apoptotic cells in S. aureus treatment were significantly higher than that in control cells (no infection and treatment), whereas S. aureus + PG treatment was able to significantly (P<0.01) inhibit the percentage of cells undergoing S. aureus induced apoptosis (Fig 4D). Moreover, the observation of significant (P<0.05) up regulation of the pro-apoptotic gene Casp3, and significant (P<0.05) down regulation of Bcl2, an anti-apoptotic gene, simultaneously in S. aureus treatment compared with S. aureus + PG as revealed by genome wide analysis, further suggested that S. aureus infection induced the apoptosis and the PG treatment, in turn antagonized this process.
Panel, A represents the apoptosis signal in the control cells. Panel, B represents the S. aureus induced apoptosis; and Panel, C depicts the S. aureus +PG induced apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells. Panel, D represents the mean percentage of apoptotic cells measured from three independent experiments. Double asterisks indicate a significant difference (P<0.01) between the samples.
Discussion
The pathogenesis of S. aureus infection has continued to evolve and S. aureus has acquired the ability to anticipate and circumvent the host defense response [15]. It has been shown that S. aureus can escape the phagosomes of professional phagocytes and instead induce apoptosis and pyronecrosis in these cells [16]. The intracellular S. aureus also escaped the endosome and resulted in induction of apoptosis in epithelial cells [17]. In another study, it has been suggested that S. aureus suppressed the phosphorylation of nuclear factor-κB and thereby accelerated targeted cell death [18]. However, in this study, we have shown that PG stimulation promoted the expression of Nfkb1, Nfkbie, Nfkbiz, and other NF-κB pathway genes and that would eventually result in enhancement of S. aureus phagocytosis.
S. aureus biofilms have been shown to induce apoptosis in cells and tissues [19, 20]. Bcl-2, an integral membrane protein located mainly on the outer membrane of the mitochondria, is an important regulator of the programmed cell death pathways and can suppress apoptosis [21, 22]. Bcl3 can also promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis [23, 24]. So, Bcl2, Bcl2l1 and Bcl3 are all anti-apoptotic proteins [25]. And TNF-alpha is able to activate the cell-death pathway [26, 27, 28]. In this context, our microarray expression analysis showed that PG stimulation up-regulated the expression of Bcl2, Bcl2l1, Bcl3, and TNF genes and this might explain the inhibition of S. aureus-induced apoptosis in the presence of PG which we observed.
PG treatment perhaps might have also provoked the inflammation response during the S. aureus challenge as inflammation related genes, IL-1α, IL-1β, Csf2, Csf3, Nfkb1 and TLR1, were all significantly up-regulated. The interleukin family has been closely linked to the innate immune response and the control of inflammation [29], and IL-1β is an important pro-inflammatory cytokine that has the potential to activate monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils [30]. IL-1β production by phagocytes is important for protection against the mucosal pathogen S. aureus. In order to activate its secretion, PG must be internalized via phagocytosis and subsequently activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β secretion [12]. In our study, NLRP3 and IL-1β were also found to be very significantly up-regulated (P<0.01) by PG stimulation along with S. aureus infection compared with S. aureus infection alone. This indicated that the inflammation response was indeed activated by S. aureus + PG treatment, and it did play an important role in the immune response to S. aureus challenge.
In addition, S. aureus-induced corneal inflammation has been suggested to be mediated by TLR2 and myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) in resident epithelial cells and infiltrating neutrophils [31]. TLR2 mRNA expression in the liver, kidney, and lungs from postburn septic animals were rapidly up-regulated after S. aureus challenge [32]. Consistent with this observation, our results show upregulation of TLR2 by both S. aureus treatment alone or in combination with PG. However, S. aureus + PG treatment significantly upregulated MyD88 expression in comparison to S. aureus treatment alone. Also, S. aureus biofilms could circumvent TLR2 or TLR9-induced bacterial recognition pathways and significantly reduced IL-1β and TNF-α expression [33]. However, in the current study, it was observed that the presence of PG along with S. aureus resulted in upregulation of TLR1, TLR2, TLR9, MyD88, IL-1β and TNF-α expression, while S. aureus treatment alone could only up-regulate the expression of TLR2, IL-1β, and TNF-α at significantly lower levels. This difference in upregulation of certain genes in the presence of PG suggests that PG stimulation can effectively activate the inflammation and related immune response to S. aureus in Raw264.7 cells, while S. aureus alone circumvented TLR2-induced bacterial recognition pathways similar to S. aureus biofilms.
The Janus kinases (JAKs) play critical roles in several important intracellular signaling pathways, including the eponymous JAK/STAT pathway [34], central to the mediation of cytokine signaling [35, 36]. Almost 40 cytokine receptors signal through combinations of 4 JAK and 7 STAT family members, suggesting commonality across the JAK-STAT signaling system [37]. Similarly, the Janus family kinases (Jaks), Jak1, Jak2, and Jak3 have been shown to be involved not only in cell growth, survival, development, and differentiation of a variety of cells but are also critically important for immune cell function [38]. The JAK/STAT pathway played a critical role in the pro-inflammatory and apoptotic response in RAW264.7 cells [39]. Surprisingly, in our study we also observed that more than 18 key genes, including Jak2, Stat3, Stat5a, Pik3r5 and Cish, of JAK-STAT pathway were significantly up-regulated by S. aureus + PG infection, thus indicating that S. aureus + PG treatment might also activate JAK-STAT signaling.
Furthermore, PG from S. aureus has been shown to have an anti-apoptotic effect on keratinocytes and its effect seemed to be mediated by the production of the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-2 [40]. This led to the escape of S. aureus from the endosomes/phagosomes and helped it proliferate within the cytoplasm, and eventually result in the death of host cells [41–44]. However, S. aureus may cover up the PG from it and prevent the immune response induced by PG. As PG plays an important role in S. aureus infection, we choose free PG extracted from S. aureus to activate immune response in RAW 246.7 cells before S. aureus infection. In this study, S. aureus was also able to escape from the endosomes/phagosomes and persist intracellularly in vacuoles for at least one day, ultimately resulting in Raw264.7 cell death. We show that added PG in advance can induce an effective immune response against S. aureus infection in RAW264.7 cells.
In summary, our results revealed that, although PG is a part of the cell wall structure of S. aureus, the independent application of free PG could exert different bioactivity. Free PG activated the complete immune response including inflammation to S. aureus infection and inhibited the apoptosis caused by S. aureus. Free PG may activate the JAK-STAT signaling pathway to regulate the inflammation and apoptotic response in the host cells. Based on previous studies, free PG can become a good strategy for clinical control of S. aureus infection. However, free PG treatment has its limitation for clinical therapy like the dosage and the drug-resistance strain. In addition, this is the first report suggesting the additional role of PG in S. aureus infection and this observation may have clinical importance.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Sequences of forward primer, reverse primer and TaqMan probe used for real-time quantitative RT-PCR.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190490.s001
(DOC)
References
- 1. Flannagan RS, Cosio G, Grinstein S. Antimicrobial mechanisms of phagocytes and bacterial evasion strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009; 7: 355–366. pmid:19369951
- 2. Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015; 13: 529–543. pmid:26272408
- 3. Gresham HD, Lowrance JH, Caver TE, Wilson BS, Cheung AL, Lindberg FP. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus inside neutrophils contributes to infection. J Immunol. 2000; 164: 3713–3722. pmid:10725730
- 4. Garzoni C, Kelley WL. Staphylococcus aureus: new evidence for intracellular persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2009; 17: 259–265.
- 5. Löffler B, Tuchscherr L, Niemann S, Peters G. Staphylococcus aureus persistence in non-professional phagocytes. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014; 304: 170–176. pmid:24365645
- 6. Clement S, Vaudaux P, Francois P, Schrenzel J, Huggler E, Kampf S, et al. Evidence of an intracellular reservoir in the nasal mucosa of patients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus rhinosinusitis. J Infect Dis. 2005; 192: 1023–1028. pmid:16107955
- 7. Greenlee-Wacker MC, Rigby KM, Kobayashi SD, Porter AR, DeLeo FR, Nauseef WM. Phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by human neutrophils prevents macrophage efferocytosis and induces programmed necrosis. J Immunol. 2014; 192: 4709–4717. pmid:24729616
- 8. Verdrengh M, Thomas JA, Hultgren OH. IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 mediates protection against Staphylococcus aureus infection. Microbes Infect. 2004; 6: 1268–1272. pmid:15555532
- 9. Miller LS, Pietras EM, Uricchio LH, Hirano K, Rao S, Lin H, et al. Inflammasome-mediated production of IL-1 beta is required for neutrophil recruitment against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo. J Immunol. 2007; 179: 6933–6942. pmid:17982084
- 10. Netea MG, Simon A, van de Veerdonk F, Kullberg BJ, Van der Meer JW, Joosten LA. IL-1β processing in host defense: beyond the in flammasomes. PLoS Pathog. 2010; 6: e1000661. pmid:20195505
- 11. Underhill DM, Ozinsky A, Hajjar AM, Stevens A, Wilson CB, Bassetti M, et al. The Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited to macrophage phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens. Nature. 1999; 40: 811–815.
- 12. Shimada T, Park BG, Wolf AJ, Brikos C, Goodridge HS, Becker CA, et al. Staphylococcus aureus evades lysozyme-based peptidoglycan digestion that links phagocytosis, inflammasome activation, and IL-1 beta secretion. Cell Host Microbe. 2010; 7: 38–49. pmid:20114027
- 13. Zhu F, Yue WF, Wang YX. The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation is required for phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by RAW264.7 cells. Exp Cell Res. 2014; 327: 256–263. pmid:24798100
- 14. Zhu F, Zhou YD, Jiang CX, Zhang XB. Role of JAK-STAT signaling in maturation of phagosomes containing Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep. 2013; 5: 14854.
- 15. Thammavongsa V, Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. Staphylococcus aureus degrades neutrophil extracellular traps to promote immune cell death. Science 2013; 342: 863–866. pmid:24233725
- 16. Fraunholz M., Sinha B. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: live-in and let die. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012; 2: 43. pmid:22919634
- 17. Bayles KW, Wesson CA, Liou LE, Fox LK, Bohach GA, Trumble WR. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus escapes the endosome and induces apoptosis in epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1998; 66: 336–342. pmid:9423876
- 18. Zurek OW, Pallister KB, Voyich JM. Staphylococcus aureus inhibits neutrophil-derived IL-8 to promote cell death. J Infect Dis 2015; 212: 934. pmid:25722299
- 19. Cantero D, Cooksley C, Bassiouni A, Tran HB, Roscioli E, Wormald PJ, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms induce apoptosis and expression of interferon-γ, interleukin-10, and interleukin-17A on human sinonasal explants. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015; 29: 23–28. pmid:25590311
- 20. Lone AG, Atci E, Renslow R, Beyenal H, Noh S, Fransson B, et al. Staphylococcus aureus induces hypoxia and cellular damage in porcine dermal explants. Infect Immun. 2015; 83: 2531–2541. pmid:25847960
- 21. Yang J, Liu X, Bhalla K, Kim CN, Ibrado AM, Cai J, et al. Prevention of apoptosis by Bcl-2: release of cytochrome c from mitochondria blocked. Science. 1997; 275: 1129–1132. pmid:9027314
- 22. Willis S, Day CL, Hinds MG, Huang DC. The Bcl-2-regulated apoptotic pathway. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 4053–4056. pmid:12972498
- 23. Brocke-Heidrich K, Ge B, Cvijic H, Pfeifer G, Löffler D, Henze C, et al. BCL3 is induced by IL-6 via Stat3 binding to intronic enhancer HS4 and represses its own transcription. Oncogene. 2006; 25: 7297–7304. pmid:16732314
- 24. Choi HJ, Lee JM, Kim H, Nam HJ, Shin HJ, Kim D, et al. Bcl3-dependent stabilization of CtBP1 is crucial for the inhibition of apoptosis and tumor progression in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010; 400: 396–402. pmid:20800578
- 25. Hagenbuchner J, Ausserlechner MJ, Porto V, David R, Meister B, Bodner M, et al. The anti-apoptotic protein BCL2L1/Bcl-xL is neutralized by pro-apoptotic PMAIP1/Noxa in neuroblastoma, thereby determining bortezomib sensitivity independent of prosurvival MCL1 expression. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 6904–6912. pmid:20051518
- 26. Xaus J, Comalada M, Valledor AF, Lloberas J, López-Soriano F, Argiles JM, et al. LPS induces apoptosis in macrophages mostly through the autocrine production of TNF-alpha. Blood. 2000; 95: 3823–3831. pmid:10845916
- 27. Alvarez S, Blanco A, Fresno M, Muñoz-Fernández MA. TNF-α contributes to caspase-3 independent apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells: role of NFAT. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e16100. pmid:21298033
- 28. Rath PC, Aggarwal BB. TNF-induced signaling in apoptosis. J Clin Immunol. 1999; 19: 350–364. pmid:10634209
- 29. Yao L, Bengualid V, Lowy FD, Gibbons JJ, Hatcher VB, Berman JW.Internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by endothelial cells induces cytokine gene expression. Infect Immun. 1995; 63: 1835–1839. pmid:7729892
- 30. Moynagh PN, Williams DC, O'Neill LA. Interleukin-1 activates transcription factor NFκB in glial cells. Biochem J. 1993; 294: 343–347. pmid:8373349
- 31. Sun Y, Hise AG, Kalsow CM, Pearlman E. Staphylococcus aureus-induced corneal inflammation is dependent on Toll-like receptor 2 and myeloid differentiation factor 88. Infect Immun. 2006; 74: 5325–5332. pmid:16926427
- 32. Li HY, Yao YM, Shi ZG, Dong N, Yu Y, Sheng ZY. Potential role of JAK/STAT in regulating Toll-like receptor 2 gene expression in rats with postburn Staphylococcus aureus sepsis. Shock. 2003; 20: 257–263. pmid:12923498
- 33. Thurlow LR, Hanke ML, Fritz T, Angle A, Aldrich A, Williams SH, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo. J Immunol. 2011; 186: 6585–6596. pmid:21525381
- 34. Rawlings JS, Rosler KM, Harrison DA. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J Cell Sci. 2004; 117: 1281–1283. pmid:15020666
- 35. Duhe RJ, Farrar WL. Structural and mechanistic aspects of Janus kinases: how the two-faced god wields a double-edged sword. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1998; 18: 1–15. pmid:9475661
- 36. Kisseleva T, Bhattacharya S, Braunstein J, Schindler CW. Signaling through the JAK/STAT pathway, recent advances and future challenges. Gene. 2002; 285: 1–24. pmid:12039028
- 37. Murray PJ. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J Immunol. 2007; 178: 2623–2629. pmid:17312100
- 38. Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, O'Shea JJ. Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev 2009; 228: 273–287. pmid:19290934
- 39. Wang X, Liu Q, Ihsan A, Huang L, Dai M, Hao H, et al. JAK/STAT pathway plays a critical role in the proinflammatory gene expression and apoptosis of RAW264.7 cells induced by trichothecenes as DON and T-2 toxin. Toxicol Sci. 2012; 127: 412–424. pmid:22454431
- 40. Vázquez-Sánchez EA, Rodríguez-Romero M, Sánchez-Torres LE, Rodríguez-Martínez S, Cancino-Diaz JC, Rodríguez-Cortes O, et al. Peptidoglycan from Staphylococcus aureus has an anti-apoptotic effect in HaCaT keratinocytes mediated by the production of the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-2. Microbiol Immunol. 2014; 58: 87–95. pmid:24372854
- 41. Jarry TM, Cheung AL. Staphylococcus aureus escapes more efficiently from the phagosome of a cystic fibrosis bronchial epithelial cell line than from its normal counterpart. Infect Immun. 2006; 74: 2568–2577. pmid:16622192
- 42. Kubica M, Guzik K, Koziel J, Zarebski M, Richter W, Gajkowska B, et al. A potential new pathway for Staphylococcus aureus dissemination: the silent survival of S. aureus phagocytosed by human monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3: e1409. pmid:18183290
- 43. Kobayashi SD, Braughton KR, Palazzolo-Ballance AM, Kennedy AD, Sampaio E, Kristosturyan E, et al. Rapid neutrophil destruction following phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus. J Innate Immun. 2010; 2: 560–575. pmid:20587998
- 44. Giese B., Glowinski F., Paprotka K., Dittmann S., Steiner T., Sinha B., Fraunholz M.J. Expression of δ-toxin by Staphylococcus aureus mediates escape from phago-endosomes of human epithelial and endothelial cells in the presence of β-toxin. Cell Microbiol. 2011; 13: 316–329. pmid:20946243