The decreasing range between dry- and wet- season precipitation over land and its effect on vegetation primary productivity

Guillermo Murray-Tortarolo; Víctor J. Jaramillo; Manuel Maass; Pierre Friedlingstein; Stephen Sitch

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190304

Abstract

One consequence of climate change is the alteration of global water fluxes, both in amount and seasonality. As a result, the seasonal difference between dry- (p < 100 mm/month) and wet-season (p > 100 mm/month) precipitation (p) has increased over land during recent decades (1980–2005). However, our analysis expanding to a 60-year period (1950–2009) showed the opposite trend. This is, dry-season precipitation increased steadily, while wet-season precipitation remained constant, leading to reduced seasonality at a global scale. The decrease in seasonality was not due to a change in dry-season length, but in precipitation rate; thus, the dry season is on average becoming wetter without changes in length. Regionally, wet- and dry-season precipitations are of opposite sign, causing a decrease in the seasonal variation of the precipitation over 62% of the terrestrial ecosystems. Furthermore, we found a high correlation (r = 0.62) between the change in dry-season precipitation and the trend in modelled net primary productivity (NPP), which is explained based on different ecological mechanisms. This trend is not found with wet-season precipitation (r = 0.04), These results build on the argument that seasonal water availability has changed over the course of the last six decades and that the dry-season precipitation is a key driver of vegetation productivity at the global scale.

Figures

Citation: Murray-Tortarolo G, Jaramillo VJ, Maass M, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S (2017) The decreasing range between dry- and wet- season precipitation over land and its effect on vegetation primary productivity. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0190304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304

Editor: Lucas C. R. Silva, University of Oregon, UNITED STATES

Received: August 8, 2017; Accepted: December 12, 2017; Published: December 28, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Murray-Tortarolo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All data is freely available online.

Funding: This work was supported by the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología to Dr. Guillermo N. Murray-Tortarolo. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

One consequence of anthropogenic climate change is the alteration of the hydrological cycle, causing greater water fluxes globally and changing current precipitation patterns [1]. As a result, moisture has increased over land in the wet regions/seasons and slightly decreased in the dry [2], although the actual change is complex, with high spatial and temporal variability [3,4].

Over the land, the range between dry- and wet-season precipitation has increased, particularly in the tropics [5,6], which has led to longer and more intense dry seasons in most arid ecosystems [2,7]. These results stem from the analysis of a relatively short-time period (e.g. 20 or 30 years of data), which may be insufficient to understand long-term changes in climate, as suggested in other studies [8]. Furthermore, recent research using annual data has proposed that the wetness/dryness trends in water availability and soil moisture do not seem to be related to the background climate [4], thus wet and dry regions can get wetter or drier depending on how atmospheric circulation patterns shift in space [9]. However, there has been no reconciliation of seasonal and annual trends over longer time periods (e.g. from mid-twentieth century).

In addition, recent research has shown an important link between changing seasonal and annual precipitation and trends in land carbon uptake [10]. In particular, attention has been focused on the role of dry ecosystems controlling the annual variability of land productivity [11,12] and on the impacts of change in the dry-season precipitation on regional NPP trends [7,13]. Apparently, dry regions, and particularly rainfall during the dry season, play an exceptionally important role in land carbon uptake.

In this study, we re-visited the changes in seasonal precipitation on land described by Chou et al. [5], but in two time periods: the original study period between 1979–2009 and an extended 60-year period between 1950–2009. We also complete the analysis with three observational products at a higher resolution (0.5º vs 2.5º in [5]). We explore whether the recorded seasonal changes documented for recent decades occur over a longer time period and explore the driving factors (changes in rate vs. changes in seasonal lengths). Our analysis also includes, the impact of regional changes in dry- and wet-season precipitation on evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff. Finally, we provide an ecological perspective to these trends by linking dry- and wet-season precipitation trends with modelled NPP from process-based simulations.

Materials and methods

Datasets

We used three observed precipitation datasets for the period 1950–2009, all at a 0.5º x 0.5º monthly resolution. These were: CRUV3.2 [14], GPCC [15] and PREC/L [16] (Table A in S1 File). These datasets are reconstructed based on gauge measurements of global observations and represent the best observations available, but contain limitations and uncertainties (S2 File). We used modelled ET, runoff and NPP from an ensemble of 9 DGVMs of the TRENDY-V1 compendium (Table B in S1 File) for the same period at a 1º x 1º monthly resolution [17]. All datasets were re-gridded to the same land-grid and are freely available online (Tables A and B in S1 File).

Seasonal distribution of precipitation calculations

We computed the wet and dry seasons based on the number of months with less than 100 mm/month (dry-season precipitation) or with more than 100 mm/month (wet-season precipitation) of rain. This threshold was selected based on published studies dealing with multiple small-scale comparisons or with global observations [13,18–20]. For example, Zhang et al. [19] compared the partitioning of water fluxes (evapotranspiration and runoff) across more than 1000 small watersheds and found that on average, runoff occurs when monthly precipitation exceeds 80–120 mm/month; hence, this limit can be used to separate the hydrologically distinct seasons. Malhi et al. [20] and Doughty et al. [13] analysed the hydrological threshold across the Amazon and used a similar partitioning of ~100 mm/month. Finally, Chou et al. [5] used a running mean to calculate changes in global dry- and wet-season lengths, and found an average threshold between 4–6 mm/day. However, as the actual value to distinguish between seasons varies across the studies, we conducted a sensitivity test of the threshold with precipitation values of 50, 100, 150 and 200 mm (Table A in S3 File). Based on the results from local, regional and global scales, plus the sensitivity analyses, we justify the usage of a global precipitation threshold to separate the seasons; however, when analysing local conditions, the actual value should be adequate to better represent the climatology of the site.

The dry-season precipitation represented the sum of the total precipitation for all dry months, the dry-season length was the number of months with less than 100 mm/month of precipitation and the rate was simply the total dry-season precipitation divided by dry-season length (presented as mm/day). As in some regions multiple dry/wet seasons may occur within a year, we calculated the average number of dry seasons per grid and found that most regions on land have a single, well-constrained dry season (Fig B in S3 File). However, it is important to note that some regions may have more than one dry season within a year (e.g. Eastern USA, Northwestern Europe).

We plotted the mean annual dry-season, wet-season and total precipitation anomaly (each year minus the mean value for 1950–1960) for each year during 1950–2009, with each of the three precipitation products and for the ensemble mean. A simple linear regression and the uncertainty in the slopes were calculated, based on the standard deviation for all three products. The values for the slope (m) and the significance levels (p) are included in each plot.

The procedure was repeated with the mean annual dry-season length and the dry-season precipitation rate. The seasonal range was defined as the wet-season minus the dry-season precipitation trends, following the methodology of Chou et al. [5]. Mean values represent the average of all three products. This was done annually and spatially by pixel. In addition, we calculated the periodicity of wet or dry phases in the dry-season length and rate by doing time-series analysis decomposition. We employed a serial autocorrelation function (ACF) based on the global annual mean for the wet- and dry-season length.

The spatially-weighted correlations among all three variables were estimated, as well as the spatially-weighted percentage of negative and positive change in the seasonal range. Using the vegetation mask of Ramankutty and Foley [21], we calculated the area-weighted mean for the dry- and wet-season precipitations, and the seasonal range for each ecosystem type; these were ranked according to their mean annual precipitation. We included NPP gridded linear trends for climate only runs (TRENDY project [17] simulations Sim2-Sim1, where Sim2: driven by CO₂+Climate and Sim1: CO₂-only), and estimated a spatially-weighted correlation with the dry- and wet- season precipitation trends.

The trends in ET and runoff were determined from the Sim2 simulations. This was done for all 9 models, but results are presented only for the ensemble. We correlated the trend of all three variables (NPP, ET and runoff) with the trends in the dry- and wet-season precipitation, using a spatially-weighted correlation. Finally, we chose four areas with contrasting seasonal precipitation trends and compared them with the NPP trend in each case.

Results and discussion

Changes in the annual seasonal precipitation

Our results showed that neither the annual nor the wet-season precipitation changed globally over the period 1950–2009, but there was a significant increase in dry-season precipitation (+0.13 ± 0.12 mm yr^-2, p<0.001) (Fig 1). This resulted in a decrease in the global range between dry- and wet-season precipitation (-0.20 ± 0.9 mm yr^-2) over land for the period 1950–2009, which was consistent across precipitation datasets (Table 1). These findings were opposite when the shorter time frame (1979–2009) was considered, with an increase in seasonal precipitation range (+0.20 ± 0.16 mm yr^-2 in our study and +0.41 ± 0.16 mm yr^-2, in Chou et al. [5]). Thus, it seems that the reported increase in the range between wet- and dry-season precipitation occurred only during the recent 25-year time period, but the trend acquired an opposite direction when computed for the longer 60-year window (Table 1). Apparently, the large change in wet-season precipitation is obscured in the longer time-frame and seems more likely a result of interannual or decadal variability, possibly due to a high number of La Niña years at the beginning of the 25-year time series (1988–1990) [22], the reduction of global precipitation caused by Mt. Pinatubo’s eruption in 1991, or it may represent the initial signal of the global effects of global warming on precipitation patterns. In contrast, the longer time-series shows a clear increase in dry-season precipitation, which is consistent across all observational datasets (Table 1). Previous studies over longer-time periods also reported a similar result and suggested that the increase in the dry-season precipitation could be linked to the loading of anthropogenic aerosols to the atmosphere [23], which have also been responsible for large changes in global atmospheric circulation [24].

Download:

Fig 1. Mean seasonal and annual anomaly of global precipitation.

Global annual dry-season precipitation (left), wet-season precipitation (middle) and annual precipitation (right) anomaly for 3 different precipitation products (CRU, GPCC, PRE/L) and the ensemble mean. Linear regression models for the ensemble mean are presented as a red line, and individual observation slopes are presented on the bottom left of each plot (m).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.g001

Download:

Table 1. Wet, dry and seasonal range trends for a 30-yr period (same as Chou et al. [5]) and across half the 20^th century.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.t001

Mechanisms of change: seasonal length vs. seasonal precipitation rate

There are two possible ways in which the dry-season precipitation may increase: a change in dry-season length, i.e. a longer dry season may accumulate more rain, and through an increase in precipitation rate, i.e. more rain accumulates over the same amount of time, or both. Our results showed that the mean global dry-season length remained similar from 1950–2009, lasting around 10 months on average (or 291–297 days based on the average of integer months multiplied by 30) (Fig 2A). However, there was strong decadal variability, with periods of increasing and decreasing length every 10–15 years (ACF = 13). In contrast, the dry-season precipitation rates increased steadily over time from 0.63 mm/day in 1950 to 0.88 mm/day in 2009, and displayed no consistent decadal variability (Fig 2B). The same mechanisms that modify rainfall seasonality globally operate regionally. We found small, mostly shortening changes in the dry-season length across a few key arid regions (e.g. South American and North American Plains), but strong regional changes in the dry-season precipitation rates (Fig A in S4 File). For example, there was no change in the dry-season length across most of the Amazon, but the rate increased steadily over the last 50 years.

Download:

Fig 2. Global annual dry-season length (left) and precipitation rate (right).

Legend and methodology follows Fig 1. The data employed is on a monthly resolution, but the figure is displayed in days for a better visualization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.g002

Our results are consistent with recent findings showing a probable increase in the number of extreme daily precipitation events across dry regions [25,26], which could explain the increase in dry-season precipitation rates. Additionally, Sun et al. [23] found a decrease in global precipitation variability, with both the dry regions and dry seasons becoming wetter from 1940 to 2009. Thus, it seems that the length of the dry season has not changed globally during the last six decades, but the greater incidence of extreme weather events during the dry season has increased the daily precipitation rate, and thus, the dry seasons have become wetter on average. However, it is important to note that changes in forcing-mix could push the Earth-system in a different direction and thus, these hydrological trends may not be representative of what could occur in the future, particularly across extreme climate change scenarios. For example, aerosol-forcing was a key driver of global atmospheric trends during 1950–2009, but the signal is unlikely to remain into the future as positive greenhouse gas forcing dominates over negative aerosol forcing.

Regional seasonal patterns

The decrease in the global seasonal range was also evident regionally. The gridded trends in wet- (Fig 3A) and dry-season (Fig 3B) precipitation were almost opposite to each other (r = -0.48): areas in which the wet-season precipitation increased, the dry-season precipitation decreased and vice versa. As a result, the seasonal range decreased in most of the land surface (excluding frozen regions) (62% of the total) (Fig 3C). The same pattern emerged in 10 out of 14 ecosystem types when the trend was aggregated by vegetation type, especially in the wetter ecosystems (Table B in S4 File). Overall, these results do not support the “dry gets dry” and “wet gets wet” hypothesis based solely on precipitation and are in agreement with current findings that drying and wetting patterns result from regional and local conditions [4].

Download:

Fig 3. Global gridded seasonal precipitation and net primary productivity trends.

Linear gridded trend for the wet- and dry-season precipitation, the seasonal range (wet minus dry) and vegetation net primary productivity (climate-only) for the period 1950–2009.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.g003

Impacts on water fluxes and vegetation productivity

Findings from 250 different watersheds with long-term data have shown that annual evapotranspiration correlates with precipitation on a 1:1 slope when precipitation is under ~1000 mm yr^-1; beyond this threshold, the additional rain is lost via runoff [19]. Similar results are projected using the Budyko framework to partition water fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [27,28]. Extrapolation of these results at a seasonal scale suggests that any alteration of the dry-season precipitation should lead to changes in evapotranspiration, thus affecting vegetation productivity [29]. In contrast, an increase or decrease in wet-season precipitation should translate only into changes in runoff.

We tested this prediction and found it robust at both the global scale for the period 1950–2009 (Fig A in S5 File) and over four regions with contrasting seasonal trends (Table B in S5 File). Changes in the wet-season precipitation were highly correlated with global runoff (r = 0.54), but only slightly with evapotranspiration (r = 0.16). In contrast, the dry-season precipitation trend was correlated to the evapotranspiration trend (r = 0.36), but not to runoff (r = 0.01). As a result, there was a strong correlation between the trend in modelled NPP and the trend in the dry-season precipitation (r = 0.64), mediated by its impact on evapotranspiration (Fig 3D). No such correlation was evident with the trend in the wet-season precipitation (r = 0.04) (Fig A and B in S6 File). This suggests that the vegetation responds to the excess or scarcity of dry-season rainfall. Productivity would be largely unaffected by changes in the wet-season precipitation, because a large proportion of this input does not circulate through the vegetation, but is lost via runoff. Also, vegetation growth during the wet season is usually limited by a factor other than moisture, like light availability or soil nutrients. For example, soil nutrient availability in seasonally-dry ecosystems increases mostly at the onset of rains, and other controls on available soil N, like soil C availability, may set in as the growing season progresses [30,31]; hence, productivity may be largely unaffected by changes in wet-season precipitation. These results, over a longer time period and at a higher resolution, are consistent with previous studies suggesting that changes in dry-season precipitation globally play a larger role controlling vegetation productivity than those occurring in wet-season precipitation [7]. Also, they support that vegetation greening of the planet may be partially driven by climate, in particular by interannual variability of precipitation over the tropics [32].

The relationship between dry-season precipitation and NPP may involve several plant physiological mechanisms that can vary across different ecosystems. For example, in the tropical wet forest, a reduction in water availability leads to hydraulic failure [33], which may lead to tree mortality and a decrease in NPP. Over water-limited semi-arid and arid ecosystems, the effects of changes in the hydrological regime are stronger [34,35]. For example, in the Amazon tropical forest leaf flushes and abscission are highly correlated with the length and intensity of the dry season [36]. A shorter dry season means longer foliated periods and rainfall during the dry season can cause re-foliation of many tree species [37]; as a consequence ecosystem NPP is increased [38]. Additionally, increased dry-season rainfall over arid regions may have two positive effects on vegetation: greater germination success of dominant annual species and longer growth periods [39]. On the other hand, a more intense dry season in arid grasslands dominated by annual species, does not only lead to a decrease in vegetation productivity, but also to a reordering of species abundance [40]. Therefore, across semi-arid and arid ecosystems, an increase in the dry-season precipitation represents a boost for dominant plant species productivity.

Conclusions

Our study shows that the previously reported increase in the precipitation seasonal range across the land in recent decades (1989–2005) does not occur when a longer time-period is analysed (1950–2009). In fact, the trend is reversed, with the dry seasons getting wetter due to increased precipitation rates and with no change in the wet-season rainfall. Additionally, the modelled land NPP follows the trajectory of the dry-season precipitation across different time periods (1950–2009 and 1989–2005), which suggests a strong link between the dry-season rainfall and the land C cycle.

This work is relevant when considering future scenarios, particularly regarding the interaction between the hydrological and carbon cycles. Nevertheless, there are some limitations to this approach. First, the long-term trends in the past were driven by a different atmospheric forcing-mix than over recent decades and the future. For example, atmospheric loading was a key driver in the past, but forcing by greenhouse gases has become more dominant recently. This means that our results should be interpreted carefully if projected into the future. Secondly, our results are limited by the temporal resolution of the data. The use of monthly precipitation data implies that some of the analyses (e.g. dry season length) are too broad for local or regional studies. Thirdly, our analysis is based on the presence of a single well-constrained dry season. While this is true for most regions, some showed more than one annual dry-season. Although this does not affect the main conclusions globally, it may limit interpretations at a regional scale.

Finally, our study indicates that the link between precipitation seasonality and vegetation NPP is likely to operate at smaller temporal and spatial scales. Hence, site-level studies should employ higher resolution data, as they could provide further insights to the relationship between the hydrological and C cycle on land.

Supporting information

S1 File. Datasets employed in this work.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.s001

(DOCX)

S2 File. Data limitations and uncertainty.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.s002

(DOCX)

S3 File. Sensitivity analyses of dry/wet season metrics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.s003

(DOCX)

S4 File. Gridded dry season precipitation rate and length trends.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.s004

(DOCX)

S5 File. Dry- and wet-season precipitation correlation to NPP in four contrasting regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.s005

(DOCX)

S6 File. Hydrological fluxes partitioning according to the level of precipitation and its effect on vegetation NPP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190304.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the TRENDY modelling community for data sharing on land C.

References

1. Allan RP, Soden BJ. Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Precipitation Extremes. Science. 2008;321: 1481–1484. pmid:18687921
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Kumar S, Allan RP, Zwiers F, Lawrence DM, Dirmeyer PA. Revisiting trends in wetness and dryness in the presence of internal climate variability and water limitations over land. Geophys Res Lett. 2015;42: 2015GL066858.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Feng H, Zhang M. Global land moisture trends: drier in dry and wetter in wet over land. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 18018. pmid:26658146
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Greve P, Orlowsky B, Mueller B, Sheffield J, Reichstein M, Seneviratne SI. Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat Geosci. 2014;7: 716–721.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Chou C, Chiang JCH, Lan C-W, Chung C-H, Liao Y-C, Lee C-J. Increase in the range between wet and dry season precipitation. Nat Geosci. 2013;6: 263–267.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Feng X, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3: 811–815.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Murray-Tortarolo G, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Seneviratne SI, Fletcher I, Mueller B, et al. The dry season intensity as a key driver of NPP trends. Geophys Res Lett. 2016;43: 2016GL068240.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Liu C, Allan RP. Observed and simulated precipitation responses in wet and dry regions 1850–2100. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8: 34002.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Polson D, Hegerl GC. Strengthening contrast between precipitation in tropical wet and dry regions. Geophys Res Lett. 2017;44: 2016GL071194.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Gang C, Zhou W, Li J, Chen Y, Mu S, Ren J, et al. Assessing the Spatiotemporal Variation in Distribution, Extent and NPP of Terrestrial Ecosystems in Response to Climate Change from 1911 to 2000. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e80394. pmid:24282539
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Ahlström A, Raupach MR, Schurgers G, Smith B, Arneth A, Jung M, et al. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science. 2015;348: 895–899. pmid:25999504
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Poulter B, Frank D, Ciais P, Myneni RB, Andela N, Bi J, et al. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature. 2014;509: 600–603. pmid:24847888
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Doughty CE, Metcalfe DB, Girardin C a. J, Amézquita FF, Cabrera DG, Huasco WH, et al. Drought impact on forest carbon dynamics and fluxes in Amazonia. Nature. 2015;519: 78–82. pmid:25739631
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Harris I, Jones P d., Osborn T j., Lister D h. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol. 2014;34: 623–642.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Schneider U, Becker A, Finger P, Meyer-Christoffer A, Ziese M, Rudolf B. GPCC’s new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle. Theor Appl Climatol. 2014;115: 15–40.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Chen M, Xie P, Janowiak JE, Arkin PA. Global Land Precipitation: A 50-yr Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations. J Hydrometeorol. 2002;3: 249.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Gruber N, Jones SD, Murray-Tortarolo G, Ahlström A, et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences. 2015;12: 653–679.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Maass M, Ahedo-Hernández R, Araiza S, Verduzco A, Martínez-Yrízar A, Jaramillo VJ, et al. Long-term (33years) rainfall and runoff dynamics in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in western Mexico: Management implications under extreme hydrometeorological events. For Ecol Manag. 2017;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Zhang P, Anderson B, Barlow M, Tan B, Myneni RB. Climate-related vegetation characteristics derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) leaf area index and normalized difference vegetation index. J Geophys Res Atmospheres. 2004;109: n/a–n/a.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Malhi Y, Aragão LEOC, Galbraith D, Huntingford C, Fisher R, Zelazowski P, et al. Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106: 20610–20615. pmid:19218454
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Ramankutty N, Foley JA. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1999;13: 997–1027.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Wolter K, Timlin MS. El Niño/Southern Oscillation behaviour since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI.ext). Int J Climatol. 2011;31: 1074–1087.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Sun F, Roderick ML, Farquhar GD. Changes in the variability of global land precipitation. Geophys Res Lett. 2012;39.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Hwang Y-T, Frierson DMW, Kang SM. Anthropogenic sulfate aerosol and the southward shift of tropical precipitation in the late 20th century. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40: 2845–2850.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Donat MG, Lowry AL, Alexander LV, O’Gorman PA, Maher N. More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat Clim Change. 2016;6: 508–513.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Sippel S, Zscheischler J, Heimann M, Lange H, Mahecha MD, van Oldenborgh GJ, et al. Have precipitation extremes and annual totals been increasing in the world’s dry regions over the last 60 years? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2017;21: 441–458.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Roderick ML, Farquhar GD. A simple framework for relating variations in runoff to variations in climatic conditions and catchment properties. Water Resour Res. 2011;47: W00G07.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Roderick ML, Sun F, Lim WH, Farquhar GD. A general framework for understanding the response of the water cycle to global warming over land and ocean. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2014;18: 1575–1589.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Mystakidis S, Davin EL, Gruber N, Seneviratne SI. Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using observation-based water and carbon flux estimates. Glob Change Biol. 2016;22: 2198–2215. pmid:26732346
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Montaño NM, García-Oliva F, Jaramillo VJ. Dissolved organic carbon affects soil microbial activity and nitrogen dynamics in a Mexican tropical deciduous forest. Plant Soil. 2007;295: 265–277.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Jaramillo VíJ, MartÍnez-YrÍzar A, RLS Jr. Primary Productivity and Biogeochemistry of Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. In: Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G, editors. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; 2011. pp. 109–128. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-021-7_7
32. Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni RB, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat Clim Change. 2016;6: 791–795.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Rowland L, Costa ACL da, Galbraith DR, Oliveira RS, Binks OJ, Oliveira A a. R, et al. Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature. 2015;528: 119–132. pmid:26595275
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Svoray T, Karnieli A. Rainfall, topography and primary production relationships in a semiarid ecosystem. Ecohydrology. 2011;4: 56–66.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Parolari AJ, Goulden ML, Bras RL. Ecohydrological controls on grass and shrub above‐ground net primary productivity in a seasonally dry climate. Ecohydrology. 2015;8: 1572–1583.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Lopes AP, Nelson BW, Wu J, Graça PML de A, Tavares JV, Prohaska N, et al. Leaf flush drives dry season green-up of the Central Amazon. Remote Sens Environ. 2016;182: 90–98.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Van Bloem SJ, Murphy PG, Lugo AE, Ostertag R, Costa MR, Bernard IR, et al. The Influence of Hurricane Winds on Caribbean Dry Forest Structure and Nutrient Pools1. Biotropica. 2005;37: 571–583.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Martinez-Yrizar A, Jaramillo VíJ, Maass M, burquez A, Parker G, Alvarez-Yepiz J, et al. Resilience of tropical dry forest productivity to hurricanes of different intensity in western Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management. Forthcoming;
39. Gerten D, Luo Y, Le MAIRE G, Parton WJ, Keough C, Weng E, et al. Modelled effects of precipitation on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones. Glob Change Biol. 2008;14: 2365–2379.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Hoover DL, Knapp AK, Smith MD. Resistance and resilience of a grassland ecosystem to climate extremes. Ecology. 2014;95: 2646–2656.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Allan RP, Soden BJ. Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Precipitation Extremes. Science. 2008;321: 1481–1484. pmid:18687921
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Kumar S, Allan RP, Zwiers F, Lawrence DM, Dirmeyer PA. Revisiting trends in wetness and dryness in the presence of internal climate variability and water limitations over land. Geophys Res Lett. 2015;42: 2015GL066858.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Feng H, Zhang M. Global land moisture trends: drier in dry and wetter in wet over land. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 18018. pmid:26658146
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Greve P, Orlowsky B, Mueller B, Sheffield J, Reichstein M, Seneviratne SI. Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat Geosci. 2014;7: 716–721.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Chou C, Chiang JCH, Lan C-W, Chung C-H, Liao Y-C, Lee C-J. Increase in the range between wet and dry season precipitation. Nat Geosci. 2013;6: 263–267.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Feng X, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3: 811–815.
View Article
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Murray-Tortarolo G, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Seneviratne SI, Fletcher I, Mueller B, et al. The dry season intensity as a key driver of NPP trends. Geophys Res Lett. 2016;43: 2016GL068240.
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Liu C, Allan RP. Observed and simulated precipitation responses in wet and dry regions 1850–2100. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8: 34002.
View Article
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Polson D, Hegerl GC. Strengthening contrast between precipitation in tropical wet and dry regions. Geophys Res Lett. 2017;44: 2016GL071194.
View Article
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Gang C, Zhou W, Li J, Chen Y, Mu S, Ren J, et al. Assessing the Spatiotemporal Variation in Distribution, Extent and NPP of Terrestrial Ecosystems in Response to Climate Change from 1911 to 2000. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e80394. pmid:24282539
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Ahlström A, Raupach MR, Schurgers G, Smith B, Arneth A, Jung M, et al. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science. 2015;348: 895–899. pmid:25999504
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Poulter B, Frank D, Ciais P, Myneni RB, Andela N, Bi J, et al. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature. 2014;509: 600–603. pmid:24847888
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Doughty CE, Metcalfe DB, Girardin C a. J, Amézquita FF, Cabrera DG, Huasco WH, et al. Drought impact on forest carbon dynamics and fluxes in Amazonia. Nature. 2015;519: 78–82. pmid:25739631
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Harris I, Jones P d., Osborn T j., Lister D h. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol. 2014;34: 623–642.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Schneider U, Becker A, Finger P, Meyer-Christoffer A, Ziese M, Rudolf B. GPCC’s new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle. Theor Appl Climatol. 2014;115: 15–40.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Chen M, Xie P, Janowiak JE, Arkin PA. Global Land Precipitation: A 50-yr Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations. J Hydrometeorol. 2002;3: 249.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Gruber N, Jones SD, Murray-Tortarolo G, Ahlström A, et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences. 2015;12: 653–679.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Maass M, Ahedo-Hernández R, Araiza S, Verduzco A, Martínez-Yrízar A, Jaramillo VJ, et al. Long-term (33years) rainfall and runoff dynamics in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in western Mexico: Management implications under extreme hydrometeorological events. For Ecol Manag. 2017;
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Zhang P, Anderson B, Barlow M, Tan B, Myneni RB. Climate-related vegetation characteristics derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) leaf area index and normalized difference vegetation index. J Geophys Res Atmospheres. 2004;109: n/a–n/a.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Malhi Y, Aragão LEOC, Galbraith D, Huntingford C, Fisher R, Zelazowski P, et al. Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106: 20610–20615. pmid:19218454
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Ramankutty N, Foley JA. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1999;13: 997–1027.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Wolter K, Timlin MS. El Niño/Southern Oscillation behaviour since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI.ext). Int J Climatol. 2011;31: 1074–1087.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Sun F, Roderick ML, Farquhar GD. Changes in the variability of global land precipitation. Geophys Res Lett. 2012;39.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Hwang Y-T, Frierson DMW, Kang SM. Anthropogenic sulfate aerosol and the southward shift of tropical precipitation in the late 20th century. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40: 2845–2850.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Donat MG, Lowry AL, Alexander LV, O’Gorman PA, Maher N. More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat Clim Change. 2016;6: 508–513.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Sippel S, Zscheischler J, Heimann M, Lange H, Mahecha MD, van Oldenborgh GJ, et al. Have precipitation extremes and annual totals been increasing in the world’s dry regions over the last 60 years? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2017;21: 441–458.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Roderick ML, Farquhar GD. A simple framework for relating variations in runoff to variations in climatic conditions and catchment properties. Water Resour Res. 2011;47: W00G07.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Roderick ML, Sun F, Lim WH, Farquhar GD. A general framework for understanding the response of the water cycle to global warming over land and ocean. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2014;18: 1575–1589.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Mystakidis S, Davin EL, Gruber N, Seneviratne SI. Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using observation-based water and carbon flux estimates. Glob Change Biol. 2016;22: 2198–2215. pmid:26732346
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Montaño NM, García-Oliva F, Jaramillo VJ. Dissolved organic carbon affects soil microbial activity and nitrogen dynamics in a Mexican tropical deciduous forest. Plant Soil. 2007;295: 265–277.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Jaramillo VíJ, MartÍnez-YrÍzar A, RLS Jr. Primary Productivity and Biogeochemistry of Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. In: Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G, editors. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; 2011. pp. 109–128. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-021-7_7

[ref32] 32. Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni RB, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat Clim Change. 2016;6: 791–795.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Rowland L, Costa ACL da, Galbraith DR, Oliveira RS, Binks OJ, Oliveira A a. R, et al. Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature. 2015;528: 119–132. pmid:26595275
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Svoray T, Karnieli A. Rainfall, topography and primary production relationships in a semiarid ecosystem. Ecohydrology. 2011;4: 56–66.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Parolari AJ, Goulden ML, Bras RL. Ecohydrological controls on grass and shrub above‐ground net primary productivity in a seasonally dry climate. Ecohydrology. 2015;8: 1572–1583.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Lopes AP, Nelson BW, Wu J, Graça PML de A, Tavares JV, Prohaska N, et al. Leaf flush drives dry season green-up of the Central Amazon. Remote Sens Environ. 2016;182: 90–98.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Van Bloem SJ, Murphy PG, Lugo AE, Ostertag R, Costa MR, Bernard IR, et al. The Influence of Hurricane Winds on Caribbean Dry Forest Structure and Nutrient Pools1. Biotropica. 2005;37: 571–583.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Martinez-Yrizar A, Jaramillo VíJ, Maass M, burquez A, Parker G, Alvarez-Yepiz J, et al. Resilience of tropical dry forest productivity to hurricanes of different intensity in western Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management. Forthcoming;

[ref39] 39. Gerten D, Luo Y, Le MAIRE G, Parton WJ, Keough C, Weng E, et al. Modelled effects of precipitation on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones. Glob Change Biol. 2008;14: 2365–2379.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Hoover DL, Knapp AK, Smith MD. Resistance and resilience of a grassland ecosystem to climate extremes. Ecology. 2014;95: 2646–2656.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials and methods

Datasets

Seasonal distribution of precipitation calculations

Results and discussion

Changes in the annual seasonal precipitation

Mechanisms of change: seasonal length vs. seasonal precipitation rate

Regional seasonal patterns

Impacts on water fluxes and vegetation productivity

Conclusions

Supporting information

S1 File. Datasets employed in this work.

S2 File. Data limitations and uncertainty.

S3 File. Sensitivity analyses of dry/wet season metrics.

S4 File. Gridded dry season precipitation rate and length trends.

S5 File. Dry- and wet-season precipitation correlation to NPP in four contrasting regions.

S6 File. Hydrological fluxes partitioning according to the level of precipitation and its effect on vegetation NPP.

Acknowledgments

References

Cookie Preference Center

Customize Your Cookie Preference