http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-7563
Figures
Abstract
Flowering in plants is synchronized by both environmental cues and internal regulatory factors. Previous studies have shown that the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica promotes the growth and early flowering in Coleus forskohlii (a medicinal plant) and Arabidopsis. To further dissect the impact of P. indica on pathways responsible for flowering time in Arabidopsis, we co-cultivated Arabidopsis with P. indica and used RT-qPCR to analyze the main gene regulation networks involved in flowering. Our results revealed that the symbiotic interaction of Arabidopsis with P. indica promotes early flower development and the number of siliques. In addition, expression of the core flowering regulatory gene FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), of genes controlling the photoperiod [CRYPTOCHROMES (CRY1, CRY2) and PHYTOCHROME B (PHYB)] and those related to gibberellin (GA) functions (RGA1, AGL24, GA3, and MYB5) were induced by the fungus, while key genes controlling the age and autonomous pathways remained unchanged. Moreover, early flowering promotion conferred by P. indica was promoted by exogenous GA and inhabited by GA inhibitor, and this effect could be observed under long day and neutral day photoperiod. Therefore, our data suggested that P. indica promotes early flowering in Arabidopsis likely through photoperiod and GA rather than age or the autonomous pathway.
Citation: Pan R, Xu L, Wei Q, Wu C, Tang W, Oelmüller R, et al. (2017) Piriformospora indica promotes early flowering in Arabidopsis through regulation of the photoperiod and gibberellin pathways. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0189791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189791
Editor: Meixue Zhou, University of Tasmania, AUSTRALIA
Received: September 29, 2017; Accepted: December 3, 2017; Published: December 19, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data are available from figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5675032.v1.
Funding: RO was supported by CRC1127. The financial support was provided by the Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education (KF201515).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The root endophyte fungus P. indica is a basidiomycete of the Sebacinaceae family and mimics arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in many aspects[1]. P. indica can colonize the roots of a broad range of hosts including monocot and dicot plants. It enhances the tolerance of colonized plants against drought, acidity, heavy metals, and various other abiotic stresses as well as biotic stresses[1–8]. In contrast to AMF, P. indica can be easily cultivated in axenic culture, and it could be very useful for crop improvement and sustainable agriculture[4].
Flowering set the switch from the vegetative to reproductive development and is a prerequisite for crop production. Late flowering cause long generation times and always severely hampers breeding success. Thus, research on flowering time regulation is important for genetic improvement in crops[9].
Regulation of flowering time in the model plant Arabidopsis is tightly controlled by various endogenous and environmental cues and has been extensively studied, and the central flowering-time regulatory pathways are conserved across the plant kingdom in general.
Various input signals activate signal transduction pathways which control flowering time. Among them are genes required for controlling the photoperiod, the vernalization time (long exposure to cold), gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis and signaling, age pathway as well as the autonomous (genetic makeup) pathway[10,11]. The photoperiod pathway refers to response to day length and quality of light and it plays a crucial role in controlling flowering in Arabidopsis[11,12]. According to an external coincidence model, light resets the circadian clock which controls proper oscillation of the CONSTANTS (CO) mRNA level, and also regulates the CO protein stability[12].
Far-red and blue light promote flowering through phytochrome A (PHYA) and cryptochromes (cryptochromes 1 and cryptochromes 2, CRY1 and CRY2), respectively. Red light inhibits flowering through PHYB function across a range of species. PHYA, CRY1, and CRY2 have been shown to prevent CO protein degradation, whereas PHYB promotes its degradation[13]. The increase in the CO protein level activates the transcription of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) only under long day conditions. FT then moves through the phloem to the meristem, where it associates with FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD), and the FT-FD complex promotes expression of the SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 (SOC1) gene and downstream floral meristem identity genes, such as APETALA1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY) to induce flowering[14–17].
The vernalization pathway accelerates flowering on exposure to a longer cold periods through the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and other FLC clade members. After vernalization, FLC expression is strongly repressed through histone modifications which leads to the activation of the downstream floral integrator genes FT and SOC1 to promote flowering [18].
In Arabidopsis, GA signaling is required for floral induction. GA directly promotes SOC1 and LFY expression and the increased level of SOC1 mRNA, which, in turn, activates the downstream genes LFY and AP1 to induce flowering. This relay of information from GA to SOC1 occurs dependent of DELLA proteins degradation such as the RGA, RGL2 and with a partial contribution of RGL1[19]. Kim et al. [20] reported that P. indica-inoculated Arabidopsis plants displayed a significant early flowering phenotype, activation of flowering regulatory and GA biosynthetic genes, and an increase in GA4 content. Their data indicated that the GA pathway in Arabidopsis is targeted by P. indica and might be responsible for the early flowering effect.
The autonomous pathway function normally to limit the accumulation of FLC expression level throughout development stages independent of the photoperiod and GA[21]. Age pathway involved in flowering regulation independent of photoperiod vernalization, and GA pathway. MicroRNA and SPL (SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE) are key components in age pathway[22]. Taken together, these core pathways regulate the expression of central floral pathway integrators, such as FT and SOC1 which in turn regulate the downstream floral identity genes to control flowering[11, 12].
Although early flowering in Arabidopsis was induced by P. indica through activating the GA pathway and regulating the expression level of floral integrators[20], other factors regulating the flowering time are less investigated. Our results confirm previous observations that P. indica promotes flower development and silique production. We show that the core flowering regulatory gene FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), the photoreceptor genes controlling the photoperiod (CRY1 and PHYB), as well as the GA-related genes REPRESSOR OF ga1-3 (RGA1), AGAMOUSLIKE 24 (AGL24), GA3 (GA REQUIRING 3), and the bHLH transcription factor MYB5 are up-regulated by P. indica, while the key genes for the age and autonomous pathways remained unchanged. Early flowering promotion effect can be observed under long day and neutral day photoperiod. Therefore, our data indicate that P. indica promotes early flowering in Arabidopsis likely through photoperiod and the GA pathway rather than age or the autonomous pathway.
Results
Plant growth, flowering time
Microscopic inspection of the roots of Arabidopsis colonized by P. indica to ensure that the fungus enters roots and grows intracellularly in the root cortex (S1 Fig). Under our experimental conditions, the heights and leaf areas of P. indica-colonized plants were significantly increased compared to non-colonized plants (Figs 1A and 2A). Also the number of siliques produced by four investigated Arabidopsis ecotypes Ler, Col, C24, and Cvi-0 was ~2-fold higher in the presence of the fungus (Fig 1C).
(A) Picture of 5-week-old Arabidopsis (4 ecotypes) plants with (+P, right) or without (-P, left) P. indica inoculation. (B) Days until flowering. (C) Silique number of P. indica-colonized and non-colonized plants. Experiments were repeated independent for four times with similar results. “*” indicates significant difference (p<0.05) according to Student’s t-test.
Picture (A) and flowering time (B) of 4-week Arabidopsis (4 ecotypes) plants with (+P, right) or without (-P, left) P. indica inoculation in sterile MS medium. Experiments repeated for four times and each replicate represents 18 samples. “*” indicates significant difference at p<0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
We observed that Ler, Cvi-0, Col and C24 plants grown in soil flowered on the 32nd day, 34th day, 33rd, and 32nd day, respectively. P. indica inoculation promotes earlier flowering of Ler, Cvi-0, Col and C24 plants for 10 days, 7 days, 8 days, and 8 days, respectively (Figs 1 and 2). This demonstrated that the early flowering induced by P. indica is ecotype independent. Similar results were obtained for plants grown in sterile cultures, and we observed that Ler, Col, Cvi-0, and C24 plants inoculated by P. indica flowered 5 to 6 days earlier than those grown without P. indica inoculation (Fig 2). Apparently, the stimulatory effect of the fungus on flowering time is independent of the growth conditions and ecotype.
P. indica affects the expression of flowering-regulatory genes
To determine the pathway by which P. indica induces early flowering, we checked the expression levels of key genes in the photoperiod, GA, autonomous, vernalization and age pathways between 8 to 13 days after inoculation (DAI).
Phytochromes mainly absorb red and far-red light and phytochrome A (PHYA) promotes flowering while PHYB inhibits flowering. The mRNA level of PHYA is 1.5–2 times higher in P. indica-colonized Arabidopsis (11, 12 and 13 DAI) compared to uncolonized plants, while that of PHYB showed no significant difference between plants with P. indica inoculation and without. The blue/ultraviolet-absorbing cryptochromes CRY1 and CRY2 promote flowering. The mRNA level of CRY1 in P. indica-inoculated Arabidopsis is 2.1 times higher than in the uncolonized control 8 DAI while the mRNA level of CRY2 showed no significant difference. CO, a key gene in the signal output way of the biological clock is regulated by the clock and generates 24 hours of periodic oscillation[10]. Fig 3 demonstrates that the periodicity of the CO mRNA level in P. indica-inoculated Arabidopsis is impaired and the mRNA level is higher in P. indica-inoculated plants compared to the uncolonized controls between 7 and 10 DAI. In particular, the strong increase in the CO mRNA level during the later time points may participate in early flowering. The FT mRNA level increased even stronger in the presence of P. indica. FT expression is activated by CO, which is a signal for photoperiodic signaling transported from leaf to shoot meristem to induce floral development, and high expression level of FT promote flowering (Fig 3).
Col in sterile culture was chosen for gene expression. The samples were harvested 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 DAI for RT-qPCR. Bars represent SEs of three technical repeates. Experiments were repeated independent for three times with similar results and one representative result was showed.
Given that genes of the photoperiod pathway responsible for flowering time responded to the fungal treatment, we placed the plants under long day, neutral day, and short day photoperiod conditions. We observed that plants grown under long day conditions flowered (the 31st day) a little earlier than those grown under neutral day (the 32nd day), and short day photoperiod conditions (the 33rd day). P. indica inoculation promotes flowering of Arabidopsis under long, neutral, and short day conditions for 5 days, 3 days, and 1 day, respectively (Fig 4).
GAs act as major factors promoting flowering in Arabidopsis. The ENT-KAURENE OXIDASE 1 (GA-REQUIRING3, GA3) gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 protein family that is involved in later steps of the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway. The expression level of GA3 in P. indica-inoculated Arabidopsis increased during the co-cultivation experiment and was ~ 5-times higher in the presence of the fungus after 13 days of co-cultivation. RGA1, which belongs to the DELLA gene family, negatively regulates flowering, and the expression level of RGA1 was slightly reduced in plants colonized by P.indica for 10 and 11 days. MiR159 is regulated by DELLA protein, and MYB5 also responded to P. indica treatment which function downstream of miR159. SCO1 is the key gene regulating flowering in response to GA. The mRNA level of SCO1 responded to P. indica as well. Finally, the stimulatory effect of the fungus on the mRNA level of the GA responsive gene AGAMOUSLIKE 24 (AGL24) supports the idea that this phytohormone might be a target of the fungus (Fig 5).
Col in sterile culture was chosen for gene expression. The samples were harvested at 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 DAI for RT-qPCR. Bars represent SEs of three technical repeats. Experiments were repeated independent for three times with similar results and one representative result was showed.
Given that genes in the GA pathway, which control flowering time, were influenced significantly by the fungus, we treated the wild-type plants with 0.1 mM GA and 10 μM GA inhibitor uniconazole before transferring to normal growth conditions. GA promoted both growth and flowering of Col plants in the presence and absence of P. indica. In contrast, the early-flowering phenotype conferred by P. indica was vanished by the treatment with uniconazole (Fig 6). These results indicated that the GA pathway is at least partially responsible for P. indica-induced early-flowering.
0.1 mM GA and 10 μM GA inhibitor uniconazole was added to the MS medium. Bars represent SEs and are based on 3 independent experiments.
We also checked the response of key genes involved in other flowering controlling pathways. FVE and FCA, two representatives of the autonomous pathway, showed no significant response to P. indica and the expression of FD which codes for an enzyme located downstream of FVE and FCA, also did not respond to the fungus (Fig 7). Thus, the autonomous pathway appears to be not a target of P. indica in controlling flowering.
Col in sterile culture was chosen for gene expression analyses. The samples were harvested at 8 DAI, 10 DAI, 11 DAI, 12 DAI, and 13 DAI for RT-qPCR. Bars represent SEs of three technical repeats. Experiments were repeated independent for three times with similar results and one representative result was showed.
SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 3 and -9 (SPL3, -9) are the key genes of the age pathway, and they are responsible for flower initiation during aging. The SPL3 and SPL9 transcript levels were comparable in colonized and uncolonized plants, and a downstream gene of SPL3 and -9, APEATLA2 (AP2) also showed no stimulation after P. indica inoculation. Finally, both the FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), and the gene for its activator, FRI (FRIGIDA), are key components of the vernalization pathway, and both genes did not respond to P. indica as well (Fig 8).
Col in sterile culture was chosen for gene expression. The samples were harvested at 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 DAI for RT-qPCR. Bars represent SEs of three technical repeats. Experiments were repeated independent for three times with similar results and one representative result was showed.
These results strongly suggest that the GA and light-dependent pathways are targets of P. indica to promote early flowering rather than the autonomous and age pathways.
Discussion
In the past, early flowering is often observed in stressful environments as a compensatory mechanism which enables the plant to efficiently use its resources to produce at least a few viable seeds[23,24]. However, in our study, we found P.indica promotes both the flowering and siliques production of Arabidopsis. In recent years, early flowering is more considered as an effective way to shorten the growth period and thus increases yield. Early flowering can be utilized for high-speed breeding and helps plant to avoid abiotic hazards, such as high temperature or chilling damage, especially in regions with four distinctive seasons. In addition, for some medical and ornamental plants, early flowering has important economic advantages.
In the present studies, P. indica was axenically cultivated and applied to the Arabidopsis grown in soil or medium in order to analyze its effects on the expression of genes representing the four main pathways controlling flowering time. We observed that P. indica promotes early flowering, similar to findings reported by others for Arabidopsis and other host species [25–27].
A possible explanation for the faster flower development induced by P. indica could be earlier expression of developmentally regulated and flower controlling genes [20]. Two photoreceptor families, PHYA, PHYB and CRY1, CRY2, control the light cycle. The periodic signal is transmitted to the biological clock, which regulates expression of the key gene CO. In our investigation, the expression level of PHYA and CRY1 are higher in P. indica-colonized plants while PHYB and CRY2 remain unchanged. Moreover, early flowering promotion conferred by P. indica was photoperiod dependent (Fig 4). Thus, we suggested that the photoperiod pathway was an effective channel influenced by P. indica to promote early flowering.
In our study, several key genes in the GA pathway responsible for the control of flowering time were influenced significantly by the fungus, which is consistent with the observation that early flower induction is GA dependent[20]. In addition, levels of gibberellins in P. indica colonized roots increased in Chinese cabbage and barley seedlings and a GA2ox gene mediating inactivation of active GA was found to be down-regulated in barley plants in response to P. indica inoculation, suggesting that GA biosynthesis is enhanced by P. indica [28–31]. An up-regulation of gibberellin biosynthetic (Gibberellin 20-Oxidase2, Gibberellin 3-Oxidase1 and Gibberellin requiring 1) genes and an increase in GA4 content were found in P. indica colonized plants and these data indicate that P. indica promotes early flowering in Arabidopsis likely by increasing gibberellin content[20]. Therefore, the GA pathway is at least partially responsible for the early-flowering phenotype conferred by P. indica inoculation.
In a recent study, DELLA was shown to interact with FLC to enhance the inhibition ability of FLC. The inhibition ability of FLC is reduced when exogenous GA promoted the degradation of DELLA [10]. DELLA proteins played key roles in GA and other phytohormones (e.g ethylene) regulated flowering promotion. Several studies revealed that mutants in brassinosteroid (BR) signaling pathway showed a different flowering phenotype[32–35]. BR signaling also interacts with GA and abscisic acid (ABA) pathways signals to control flowering time[36,37]. In addition, ABA, ethylene, and salicylic acid (SA) are also critical in regulating flowering[36, 38, 39].
Since we did not observe a stimulation of genes involved in the age and autonomous pathways, we propose that they are not the major targets of the fungus in promoting flower initiation and/or development and most of our work are summarize in Fig 9 using a model according to the review of Hill [40].
Positive and negative regulatory connections are indicated by arrows and lines with T-ends, respectively. Gene name abbreviations are explained in text.
Although our results suggested a more specific control of flower initiation and development by P. indica, the increased growth and thus more efficient uptake of growth-limiting nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous could also favor early flowering. P. indica promotes phosphorous and nitrogen uptake from the soil[41–45]. However, to what extend nutrient availability participates in flower induction is difficult to elucidate because alteration in nutrient supply affects multiple biochemical pathways in plants.
Materials and methods
P. indica growth condition and co-cultivation with Arabidopsis
The fungus was cultivated in a 250 mL flask with Aspergillus (ASP) medium. This flask was placed on a shaker (150 r min-1), and the fungus was grown in the dark at a constant temperature of 25°C. After 14 days, the liquid was removed by filtration and excess culture medium carefully removed from the mycelia.
Four Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes, Columbia (Col-0), Landsberg (Ler), Cape Verdi Island (Cvi-0), and C24 were used for the flowering experiment in soil, on PMN and MS media. Seeds on agar plates were cold-treated at 4°C for 2 days in the dark. Ten day- old young seedlings (2 plants in a pot and 50 pots were used) were transferred to soil and 1 ml of 0.1% P. indica suspension were added (1 g fresh mycelium per liter of water, injection of the suspension into the soil), and dead mycelia were added into the soil as a control followed Xu et al. [6]. The growth conditions is 22°C with a 16 h-light and 8 h-dark photoperiod (long day conditions). Ten day- old young seedlings were transferred to PMN medium and co-cultivated with P. indica for 8 days (4 plants in a petri dish and 20 petri dishes were used for each treatment). Then Arabidopsis plants and P. indica were transferred to bigger glass bottles with MS medium for phenotype observation and gene expression analysis. Short day (8 h-light and 16-h-dark) as well as neutral day (12 h-light and 12 h-dark) were also used to study the effect of the photoperiod on the early flowering phenotype.
Root colonization by P. indica was examined one week after inoculation. The roots were harvested from each plant and stained with trypan blue. Colonization of roots was assessed using a Leica microscope (DM5000 B; Germany).
Measurement of flowering time and number of siliques
After checking the colonization of the plants at day 7, they were observed every day for growth promotion and flower induction by photography. For the standardized experiments, Arabidopsis seedlings were grown in soil under long day condition (16 h light—8 h dark), 22°C, and flowering time was measured by counting the number of rosette and cauline leaves at the first flower blooming. The experiment was repeated three times and data obtained from 60 plants were statistically analyzed.
RNA preparation and analysis of gene expression by RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of total RNA was subjected to first-strand cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara). RT-qPCR was performed by the SYBR green method using the StepOne Plus Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR and the 2-△△Ct method[46] was used to calculated the cycle threshold value of each sample. The expression levels of the described key genes were normalized to ACTIN2. The experiments were repeated (biological replicates) three times, with similar results, and the representative data from one replicate are shown. Data are means ± SD (n = 3) of three technical replicates. RT-qPCR primers were designed by Primer Primer5 are listed in S1 Table.
Chemicals supplements
For experiments with GA and uniconazole supplementation, Arabidopsis seedlings colonized with P. indica for 8 days were transferred to MS medium containing 0.1 mM GA (Sigma-Aldrich) according to Domagalska[37] or 10 uM uniconazole (mixture from Sigma-Aldrich). The flowering phenotype was recorded as described above.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Trypan blue staining of Arabidopsis roots showing intracellular P. indica chlamydospores observed at day 9.
Bar, 20 mm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189791.s001
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Xiaohong Li for contribution in data collection. We are grateful to Dr Shuangcheng Ding, and Hongwei Wang for helpful discussions.
References
- 1. Oelmüller R, Sherameti I, Tripathi S, Varma A (2009) Piriformospora indica, a cultivable root endophyte with multiple biotechnological applications. Symbiosis 49: 1–17.
- 2. Waller F, Achatz B, Baltruschat H, Fodor J, Becker K, Fischer M, et al. (2005) The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 13386–13391. pmid:16174735
- 3. Kumar M, Yadav V, Tuteja N, Johri AK (2009) Antioxidant enzyme activities in maize plants colonized with Piriformospora indica. Microbiology 155: 780–790. pmid:19246749
- 4. Yadav V, Kumar M, Deep DK, Kumar H, Sharma R, Tripathi T, et al. (2010) A phosphate transporter from the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica plays a role in phosphate transport to the host plant. Journal of Biological Chemistry 285: 26532–26544. pmid:20479005
- 5. Dolatabadi HK, Goltapeh EM, Jaimand K, Rohani N, Varma A (2011) Effects of Piriformospora indica and Sebacina vermifera on growth and yield of essential oil in fennel (foeniculum vulgare) under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Basic Microbiology 51: 33–39. pmid:21259287
- 6. Xu L, Wang A, Wang J, Wei Q, Zhang W (2017) Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance on Zea mays L. through enhancement of antioxidant activity and expression of drought-related genes. The Crop Journal l 5: 251–258.
- 7. Hosseini F, Mosaddeghi MR, Dexter AR (2017) Effect of the fungus Piriformospora indica on physiological characteristics and root morphology of wheat under combined drought and mechanical stresses. Plant Physiology & Biochemistry 118: 107–120.
- 8. Hussin S, Khalifa W, Geissler N, Koyro HW (2017) Influence of the root endophyte Piriformospora indica on the plant water relations, gas exchange and growth of chenopodium quinoa at limited water availability. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 5: 373–384.
- 9. Simpson GG, Dean C (2002) Arabidopsis, the rosetta stone of flowering time? Science 296: 285–289. pmid:11951029
- 10. Srikanth A, Schmid M (2011) Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences 68: 2013–2037.
- 11. Andrés F, Coupland G (2012) The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nature Reviews Genetics 13: 627–639. pmid:22898651
- 12. Song YH, Shim JS, Kinmonthschultz HA, Imaizumi T (2015) Photoperiodic flowering: time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annual Review of Plant Biology 66(1): 441–464.
- 13. Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W, Ravenscroft D, Samach A, Coupland G (2004) Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 303: 1003–1006 pmid:14963328
- 14. Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, et al. (2005) FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at theshoot apex. Science 9: 1052–1056.
- 15. Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, et al. (2007) FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floralinduction of Arabidopsis. Science 316: 1030–1033. pmid:17446353
- 16. Yoo SK, Chung KS, Kim J, Lee JH, Hong SM, Yoo SJ, et al. (2005) CONSTANS activates SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 through FLOWERING LOCUST to promote flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 139: 770–778. pmid:16183837
- 17. Wigge PA, Min CK, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU, et al. (2005) Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309: 1056–1059. pmid:16099980
- 18. Kim DH, Doyle MR, Sung S, Amasino RM (2009) Vernalization: winter and the timing of flowering in plants. Annual Review of Cell & Developmental Biology 25: 277–299.
- 19. Cheng H, Qin L, Lee S, Fu X, Richards DE, Cao D, et al. (2004) Gibberellin regulates arabidopsis floral development via suppression of della protein function. Development 131(5): 1055–1064. pmid:14973286
- 20. Kim D, Abdelaziz ME, Ntui VO, Guo X, Al-Babili S (2017) Colonization by the endophyte Piriformospora indica leads to early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana likely by triggering gibberellin biosynthesis. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications 490: 1162–1167.
- 21. Komeda Y (2004) Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 521–535. pmid:15377230
- 22. Wang JW (2014) Regulation of flowering time by the miR156-mediated age pathway[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany 65(17):4723–4730. pmid:24958896
- 23. Wada KC, Takeno K (2010). Stress-induced flowering. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5(8), 944–947.
- 24. Park HJ, Kim WY, Pardo JM, Yun DJ (2016) Molecular interactions between flowering time and abiotic stress pathways. International Review of Cell & Molecular Biology 327: 371–412.
- 25. Kumari R, Kishan H, Bhoon YK, Varma A (2003) Colonization of cruciferous plants by Piriformospora indica. Current Science 85: 1672–1674.
- 26. Fakhro A, Andrade-Linares DR, Von Bargen S, Bandte M, Büttner C, Grosch R, et al. (2010) Impact of Piriformospora indica on tomato growth and on interaction with fungal and viral pathogens. Mycorrhiza 20: 191–200. pmid:19789897
- 27. Das A, Kamal S, Shakil NA, Sherameti I, Oelmüller R, Dua M, et al. (2012) The root endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica leads to early flowering, higher biomass and altered secondary metabolites of the medicinal plant, coleus forskohlii. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7(1), 103–112.
- 28. Lee YC, Johnson JM, Chien CT, Sun C, Cai D, Lou B, et al. (2011) Growth promotion of Chinese cabbage and Arabidopsis by Piriformospora indica is not stimulated by mycelium-synthesized auxin. Molecular plant-microbe interactions: MPMI 24: 421–431. pmid:21375386
- 29. Schäfer P, Pfiffi S, Voll LM, Zajic D, Chandler PM, et al. (2009) Manipulation of plant innate immunity and gibberellin as factor of compatibility in the mutualistic association of barley roots with Piriformospora indica. Plant Journal 59: 461–474. pmid:19392709
- 30. Hedden P (2008) Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 20: 317–318.
- 31. Schäfer P, SP , Voll LM, Zajic D, Chandler PM, et al. (2009) Manipulation of plant innate immunity and gibberellin as factor of compatibility in the mutualistic association of barley roots with Piriformospora indica. Plant Journal 59: 461–474. pmid:19392709
- 32. Azpiroz R, Wu Y, Locascio JC, Feldmann KA (1998) An Arabidopsis brassinosteroid-dependent mutant is blocked in cell elongation. Plant Cell 10: 219–230. pmid:9490745
- 33. Chory J, Nagpal P, Peto CA (1991) Phenotypic and genetic analysis of det2, a new mutant that affects light-regulated seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3: 445–459. pmid:12324600
- 34. Domagalska MA, Schomburg FM, Amasino RM, Vierstra RD, Nagy F, et al. (2007) Attenuation of brassinosteroid signaling enhances FLC expression and delays flowering. Development 134: 2841–2850. pmid:17611230
- 35. Turk EM, Fujioka S, Seto H, Shimada Y, Takatsuto S, et al. (2005) BAS1 and SOB7 act redundantly to modulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis via unique brassinosteroid inactivation mechanisms. Plant Journal 42: 23–34. pmid:15773851
- 36. Davis SJ (2009) Integrating hormones into the floral-transition pathway of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell & Environment 32: 1201–1210.
- 37. Domagalska MA, Sarnowska E, Nagy F, Davis SJ (2010) Genetic analyses of interactions among gibberellin, abscisic acid, and brassinosteroids in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plos One 5: e14012. pmid:21103336
- 38. Achard P, Baghour M, Chapple A, Hedden P, Straeten DVD, et al. (2007) The plant stress hormone ethylene controls floral transition via DELLA-dependent regulation of floral meristem-identity genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 6484–6489. pmid:17389366
- 39. Kotchoni SO, Barth C (2009) Alterations in the endogenous ascorbic acid content affect flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149: 803–815. pmid:19028878
- 40. Hill CB, Li C (2016) Genetic architecture of flowering phenology in cereals and opportunities for crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1906. pmid:28066466
- 41.
Varma A. Piriformospora indica: An Axenically Culturable Mycorrhiza-Like Endosymbiotic Fungus. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001.
- 42. Sherameti I, Shahollari B, Venus Y, Altschmied L, Varma A, Oelmüller R (2005) The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica stimulates the expression of nitrate reductase and the starch-degrading enzyme glucan-water dikinase in tobacco and Arabidopsis roots through a homeodomain transcription factor that binds to a conserved motif in their promoters. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 26241–26247. pmid:15710607
- 43. Kumar M, Yadav V, Kumar H, Sharma R, Singh A, Tuteja N, et al. (2011) Piriformospora indica enhances plant growth by transferring phosphate. Plant Signaling & Behavior 6: 723–725.
- 44. Lin YL, Tsay YF (2017) Influence of differing nitrate and nitrogen availability on flowering control in arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 68: 2603–2609. pmid:28369493
- 45. Shahollari B, Varma A, Oelmüller R (2005) Expression of a receptor kinase in Arabidopsis roots is stimulated by the basidiomycete Piriformospora indica and the protein accumulates in Triton X-100 insoluble plasma membrane microdomains. Journal of Plant Physiology 162: 945–958. pmid:16146321
- 46. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609