http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-7665
Figures
Abstract
Cytological diploidization process is different in autopolyploid and allopolyploid species. Colchicine applied at the onset of meiosis suppresses the effect of pairing regulator genes resulting multivalents formation in bivalent-forming species. Colchicine treated maizes (4x = 2n = 20, AmAmBmBm) showed up to 5IV, suggesting pairing between chromosomes from genomes homoeologous Am and Bm. In untreated individuals of the alloautooctoploid Zea perennis (8x = 2n = 40, ApApAp´Ap´Bp1Bp1Bp2Bp2) the most frequent configuration was 5IV+10II (formed by A and B genomes, respectively). The colchicine treated Z. perennis show up to 10IV revealing higher affinity within genomes A and B, but any homology among them. These results suggest the presence of a paring regulator locus (PrZ) in maize and Z. perennis, whose expression is suppressed by colchicine. It could be postulated that in Z. perennis, PrZ would affect independently the genomes A and B, being relevant the threshold of homology, the fidelity of pairing in each genomes and the ploidy level. Cytological analysis of the treated hexaploid hybrids (6x = 2n = 30), with Z. perennis as a parental, strongly suggests that PrZ is less effective in only one doses. This conclusion was reinforced by the homoeologous pairing observed in untreated dihaploid maizes, which showed up to 5II. Meiotic behaviour of individuals treated with different doses of colchicine allowed to postulate that PrZ affect the homoeologous association by controlling entire genomes (Am or Bm) rather than individual chromosomes. Based on cytological and statistical results it is possible to propose that the cytological diploidization in Zea species occurs by restriction of pairing between homoeologous chromosomes or by genetical divergence of the homoeologous chromosomes, as was observed in untreated Z. mays ssp. parviglumis. These are independent but complementary systems and could be acting jointly in the same nucleus.
Citation: Poggio L, González GE (2018) Cytological diploidization of paleopolyploid genus Zea: Divergence between homoeologous chromosomes or activity of pairing regulator genes? PLoS ONE 13(1): e0189644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189644
Editor: Zhukuan Cheng, The Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (IGDB) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China, CHINA
Received: August 16, 2017; Accepted: November 29, 2017; Published: January 2, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Poggio, González. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (PICT Nº 2010-1665); University of Buenos Aires (UBACYT Nº 20020130100694BA) and National Council of Scientific Research of Argentina (PIP Nº 11220120100107CO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Polyploidy, the presence of two or more genomes per cell, has played a major role in the evolution of higher plants. It has been clearly established that most of the extant flowering plants are polyploids or paleopolyploids species [1, 2]. The result of continued polyploidization in different anastomosing lineages is a polyploidy complex. In the course of time the diploid members or the lower polyploids of a series may become extinct from a genus or even a family, leaving the higher polyploids behind at the one living representatives of the complex (ancient polyploids or paleopolyploids). Polyploidy vary along a continuum from homogeneous (autopolyploids) to partially divergent (segmental allopolyploids) and highly divergent genomes (typical allopolyploids) [3].
Genetic determination of exclusive pairing between homologous chromosomes or “cytological diploidization” is the process by which meiosis in polyploids leads to chromosomally and genetically balanced gametes. The process of suppression of homoeologous pairing is the key to success of many polyploids species. The diploid-like meiotic behaviour of polyploids could be the result of the divergence between homoeologous chromosomes or by genetic control [1, 3–9].
Little is known about the activity of genes contributing to the cytological diploidization of polyploids and their dihaploids. The best understood is the Ph1 locus of polyploid wheat, which suppresses pairing between homoeologous genomes. The best understood is the Ph1 locus of polyploid wheat, which suppresses pairing between homoeologous chromosomes. There are evidences suggesting that this gene is involved in the onset of meiosis and have functions controlling the transcription of meiotic genes. It has also been reported that Ph1 contributes to the clustering of the telomeres at nuclear membrane as a bouquet, facilitating homologue recognition, and is involved in the chromatin remodeling. There are evidences that this locus could contribute to the fidelity of synapses and crossover formation [6, 8–12]. Ph1-like genes were also postulated in other sexually propagating polyploids, such as Avena sativa, Festuca arundinacea, Brassica napus, Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense, as well as in some diploids from genera Lolium and Glandularia [1, 9, 13].
Jenczewsky and colleagues [1] reviewed diploidization in polyploids from a cytological, genetic, agronomic and evolutionary point of view. All this approach pointed out that suppression of crossing over between homoeologous chromosomes is usually under polygenic control, with one locus having a greater influence than the others and frequent gene-dosage effects. Brassica napus has become a second model for deciphering how recombination and pairing between homoeologous chromosomes are genetically suppressed. The allotetraploid B. napus (AACC) shows complete diploid-like meiotic behaviour, with only bivalents at metaphase I (MI). In their dihaploids (AC), the amount of chromosome pairing at MI varies depending on the varieties the haploids originate from. This suggested the presence of a major locus, PrBn, which regulate cross over formation between homoeologous chromosomes [1, 6, 14]. The presence of regulator genes preventing homoeologous pairing in allopolyploids, where homoeologous genomes are in two doses, was also proposed in other plants [1, 14].
The meiotic behaviour of Zea species and artificial hybrids showed the affinity between genomes and revealed that Zea is a paleopolyploid complex, being maize and its allied species or teosintes “diploidized polyploids” with a basic number of five chromosomes (x = 5) [15–17]. It also was postulated that the genus is composed by allotetraploids species, with 2n = 20 chromosomes (maize and teosintes), and the alloautooctoploid species Z. perennis (2n = 40) [15–25]. These studies supported the polyploid condition of the genus Zea and the existence of two parental genomes, arbitrarily named A and B, which can be, in different species, homologous, homoeologous or non homologous. Moreover, the genomic formulae for all species of Zea were proposed, being AmAmBmBm and AxAxBxBx for maize and teosintes with 2n = 20 chromosomes, and ApApAp´Ap´Bp1Bp1Bp2Bp2 for Z. perennis (2n = 40) [15–17, 20, 22].
Colchicine applied at the onset of meiosis favors homoeologous chromosome pairing resulting in multivalent formation in bivalent-forming species. This spindle inhibitor suppresses the expression of pairing regulator genes and alters the premeiotic alignment of chromosomes [8, 26–29]. In wheat, Feldman and Levi [8] discussed the effect of different doses of Ph1 on chromosome pairing, which can be phenocopied by premeiotic treatment with different concentration of colchicine. Cowan and Cande [30] demonstrated that colchicine induces changes in the nuclear architecture and inhibit the meiotic bouquet formation, which is defined by the aggregation of telomeres on a small region of the nuclear envelope. A failure of telomere clustering may result in unpaired chromosomes and, consequently, reduce both synapsis and recombination.
In Zea, Poggio and colleagues [17] and Naranjo and colleagues [16] showed, for the first time, the formation of up to five quadrivalents (IV) in maize (2n = 20), up to 10 IV in Z. perennis (2n = 40) and up to ten trivalents (III) in Zea perennis x Z. diploperennis hybrids (2n = 30), in material treated with colchicine 0.5mM. On this basis, these authors proposed that colchicine treatment favors homoeologous chromosome pairing by suppressing the expression of a maize locus equivalent to the Ph1 of wheat, and that maize would be a segmental allopolyploid [17, 22]. Moreover, molecular analysis provided compelling evidence that maize is a segmental allopolyploid [31–37].
The aim of the present work is to analyze how cytological diploidization is achieved and/or genetically controlled in the paleolyploids species of the genus Zea. This process is a critical step for polyploid speciation and is fundamentally different in autopolyploid and allopolyploid species. Moreover, new insights into the cytological diploidization of the alloautopolyploid Z. perennis, where homologous and homoeologous genomes share the same nucleus, are discussed. It is also analyzed if the diploid-like meiotic behaviour of polyploids is the result of the divergence between homoeologous chromosomes and/or from the activity of pairing regulator homoeologous genes.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Zea mays ssp. mays (2n = 20), Argentine maize landrace Amarillo Chico (VAV 6451) from the Laboratorio Vavilov, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA). Dihaploid maize was obtained and legated by Ing. Agr. J. Correa [38]. Zea perennis (2n = 40) from Ciudad Guzman, Jalisco, Mexico and Zea mays ssp. parviglumis (2n = 20) from Balsas valley, Guerrero, Mexico were legated by Dr. Kato T. Y., Colegio de Postgraduados, México.
Interspecific crossings between Z. perennis 2n = 40 (female) and maize 2n = 20 (male), and between Z. perennis 2n = 40 (female) and Zea mays ssp. parviglumis 2n = 20 (male) were carried out in the greenhouse to obtain the F1 hybrid plants (2n = 30). About 20 plants of Z. perennis were hand-pollinated with a bulk of pollen from 5 male plants. The species and hybrids are cultivated in the greenhouse of the Facultad de Agronomía, UBA.
Meiotic analysis
Colchicine treatment was made according to Jackson and Murray [27] with minor modifications [17]. The stems of Z. perennis and the hybrids, carrying the male tassel, were cut under a diluted solution of colchicine (Merck) (0.5 x 10–4 M, 0.5mM) and maintained therein for 12h (keeping the submerged portion of the stem in the dark). Before fixation, the stems were placed for 24h in tap water. In maize stems the same treatment were made at a high concentration of colchicine (1mM). Treated (T) and control-untreated (UT) materials were fixed in 3: 1 (absolute ethylic alcohol: acetic acid) solution. Anthers were squashed in 2% acetic haematoxylin. The meiotic configurations were studied at Diakinesis-Metaphase I. The results were analyzed in at least two individuals per treatment. A chi-square test (X2) was performed for the variable “number of multivalents” in T and UT individuals.
The fluorescent in situ hybridization technique (FISH), using 18S-rDNA and maize 180bp-knob sequences as probes, was carried out as described by Poggio and colleagues [18]. Slides were examined with a Carl Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscope.
Results
Stems of Zea mays ssp. parviglumis (2n = 20) were treated with colchicine 0.5mM and the meiotic behaviour showed 10II in all the studied cells in Prophase I.
Untreated (UT) Zea perennis (2n = 40) shows 5IV+10II in most of the analyzed cells, with a maximum of 6 IV (Table 1, Fig 1A). In the treated (T) material of Z. perennis an increase up to 10IV was found (Table 2, Fig 1B–1D). The difference in the number of multivalents in treated and untreated individuals of Z. perennis was highly significant (X2 = 117, p-value < 0.05).
A: Untreated material, 5IV+10II. B-D: Treated material with colchicine 0.5mM. B: 7IV+6II. C: 9IV+2II. D: 10IV. Ref.: IV: quadrivalents. Bar: 10 μm.
The UT 2n = 30 hybrids Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis and Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays show 5III+5II+5I as the most frequent chromosome association. A maximum of 8III and 7III was observed, respectively (Tables 3 and 4, Fig 2A, 2B and 2D).
A, B, C, E: Untreated Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays: A: 5III+5II+5I, B: 6III+5II+2I, C: one trivalent shows three FISH signals of 18SrDNA maize probe, E: one trivalent shows one FISH signal of knob maize probe on the “handle”, corresponding to maize chromosome, of the trivalent “frying pan” configuration. D: Untreated Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis, 6III+4II+4I, one III associated to nucleoli. F: Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis treated with colchicine 0.5mM, 9III+1II+1I. G-K: Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays treated with colchicine 0.5mM: G: 10III, H: 1IV+4III+6II+2I, I: 1VI+1IV+4III+3II+2I, J: 1VI+6III+2II+2I, K: 2IV+3III+5II+3I. Arrows indicate the trivalents. Arrowheads show the univalents. Ref.: I: univalents, II: bivalents, III: trivalents, IV: quadrivalents, VI: hexavalents. Bar: 10 μm.
In T hybrid Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis the frequency of six or more trivalents increased from 30% in the UT material to 87% in the treated one (Table 5, Fig 2D and 2F).
The difference in the number of multivalents in T and UT individuals of Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis was highly significant (X2 = 113, p-value < 0.05).
The T 2n = 30 hybrids Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays showed trivalents (III), quadrivalents (VI) and hexavalents (VI) (Table 6, Fig 2G–2K).
The difference in the number of multivalents in T and UT individuals of Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays was highly significant (X2 = 162, p-value < 0.05).
FISH was carried out on meiotic metaphases of UT hybrids Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays (2n = 30) using labeled 18S rDNA and knob-180bp maize sequences as probes. The 18S rDNA shows three fluorescence signals on a single trivalent (Fig 2C), indicating that the maize chromosome and the two Z. perennis chromosomes having the NOR sequences are homoeologous and are paired. The knobs are absent in Z. perennis, the knob-180bp maize sequence probe showed a strong fluorescence signal on only one of the chromosomes, on the “handle” of the “frying pan”-shaped trivalents (Fig 2E), showing that the two unlabelled chromosomes belong to the Z. perennis parent, while the labelled chromosome belongs to Z. m. ssp. mays.
In UT maize, two spatially separated groups of 5II each were observed in Prophase I (Fig 3A and 3B).
A-B, H: Untreated material. C-G: Treated with colchicine (1mM). A-B: Diplotene-Diakinesis: asynchrony in two groups of five bivalents each. C: Diakinesis: 7 bivalents (II) with terminal chiasmata and 6 univalents (arrowhead). D: Metaphase I: 5II+10I. E, F, G: Total asynapsis and homologous separation; E: two nucleolus (N), one of them associated to 5 chromosomes, F: two chromosomes associated to the nucleolus (N), G: 20I, two of them associated to the nucleolus (N). H: Untreated dihaploid maize, 5II in Diakinesis. Bar: 10 μm.
Differences in the meiotic configurations were found between two individual of maize treated with colchicine 1mM. One of the individuals showed cells with 7II+6I (15%) (Fig 2C), 6II+8I (20%) and 5II+10I (40%) (Fig 3D); also 15% of the 70 studied cells showed 2II+16I, 3II+14I and 4II+12I, while 10% presented total asynapsis with 20I (Fig 3F). The other individual showed most of the 42 studied cells (85%) with total asynapsis (20I) (Fig 3E and 3G); in some of these cells two nucleoli were observed and 5 chromosomes associated to one of them were separated from the rest (Fig 3E).
The meiosis of five UT dihaploid maizes showed 1–5 bivalents in the 14% of the 120 studied cells (Fig 3H), the rest presented 10I.
The histograms in Fig 4 represent the frequency of bivalents and multivalents in treated and untreated species and hybrids.
A, C-F: material treated with colchicine 0.5mM. B: material treated with colchicine 1mM. A: data from Poggio et al. (1990). D: data from Naranjo et al. (1994).
The genomic formulae and the parental genomic affinities revealed by the meiotic behaviour of species and hybrids, UT and T with colchicine 0.5mM, are summarized in Fig 5. In this figure the thick lines show the meiotic associations more frequently observed among homologous chromosomes, fine lines and dotted lines indicate meiotic associations among homoelogous chromosomes. Dotted lines show homoeology revealed by colchicine treatment.
Thick lines show the meiotic associations more frequently observed among homologous chromosomes, fine lines and dotted lines indicate meiotic associations among homoeologous chromosomes (dotted lines indicate less homoelogy than fine lines).
Discussion
Pairing regulator genes in Zea: cytological evidence
In many plants colchicine applied at the onset of meiosis suppresses the effect of pairing regulator genes, resulting in formation of multivalents in bivalent-forming species [8]. In maize, treatment with colchicine 0,5mM showed the formation up to 5 quadrivalents, suggesting pairing between chromosomes from genomes homoeologous. These experiments led to postulate that maize possess a locus Ph1-like preventing pairing between homoeologous chromosomes from genomes Am and Bm, and whose expression, as in wheat, could be suppressed by colchicine treatments [16, 17]. These results confirm that colchicine could be a test of homology in organisms possessing pairing regulator genes. In fact, colchicine treatment allowed to demonstrated that in maize, a tetraploid that have evolved 11 million years ago, homoeologous pairing still occur, confirming that maize should be considered a segmental allotetraploid as was postulated by cytogenetical studies [15, 17, 22–24].
In the present work, maize treated with higher doses of colchicine (1mM) showed total asynapsis (20 univalents) and, in some cells, five chromosomes were notoriously spatially separated from the rest. These chromosomes correspond to the genome arbitrarily named A because it included the NOR chromosome [24]. The other five chromosomes, belonging also to A genome, remain together with the 10 chromosomes belonging to B genomes. This could be indicating that, in this experiment, colchicine 1mM treatment induced, in addition to asynapsis, spatial separation between chromosomes homologous as was reported in wheat by Feldman and Levy [8]. These authors found homologous separation in wheat treated with colchicine 1mM and assumed that each genome occupies a separate region in the nucleus, which in turn, is recognized by Ph1 and affected by colchicine treatments. In another individual, the asynapsis occurred in only 10 chromosomes, being 5II+10I the most frequent configuration. These strongly suggest that asynapsis could have occurred in one genome (A or B). These assumption is based in previous work that propose that in species and hybrids of Zea the two spatially separated asynchronic groups of five bivalents each represent A and B ancestral genomes with x = 5 [15, 16, 20, 22, 24, 39, 40]. Therefore, meiotic behaviour of individuals treated with different doses of colchicine allowed to postulate that the pairing regulator gene proposed in maize (PrZ) affect the association of homoeologous by controlling entire chromosomal sets or genomes (Am or Bm) rather than individual chromosomes. The same effect was described in wheat by Feldman and Avivi [28].
Relevant cytological findings supporting the polyploid nature of maize was the existence of chromosome pairing in dihaploids [41, 42]. The formation up to five bivalents in dihaploids observed in the present work demonstrated the occurrence of homoeologous pairing between genomes Am and Bm. It is interesting to note that in maize (2n = 20) the formation up to 5IV in treated material indicated that pairing regulator gene proposed precluded homoeologous pairing between Am and Bm when they are in two doses in the polyploids (AmAmBmBm). Then, the formation of bivalents in dihaploids (AmBm) indicates that this pairing regulator gene would be less effective when homoeologous genomes are in only one dose. On these bases, it could be concluded that the proposed PrZ gene/s resembles the PrBn gene reported in Brassica napus. In fact, the allotetraploid B. napus (AACC) showed diploid-like meiotic behaviour, with only bivalents at MI, and pairing in dihaploids (AC) was also reported [1, 6]. Incomplete dominance when homoeologous genomes are in only one dose was also reported in Glandularia [13].
Cytological diploidization process is fundamentally different in autopolyploid and allopolyploid species, because of their different chromosome composition. In autopolyploids cytological diploidization is viewed as an increased number of bivalents at MI in detriment of multivalents. The diploidized meiotic behavior of allopolyploids could be attributed to the activity of pairing regulator genes or to the divergence between homoeologous chromosomes [1, 6, 7].
The alloautooctoploid Z. perennis (2n = 40), with a genomic formulae ApApAp´Ap´Bp1Bp1Bp2Bp2, offers an exceptional opportunity to analyze, in the same nucleus, the diploidization of highly homologous (ApApAp´Ap´) and homoeologous (Bp1Bp1 and Bp2Bp2) genomes. The meiotic studies of UT individuals of Z. perennis revealed that 5IV+10II was the most frequent chromosome configuration, in agreement with data previously reported [15, 22, 24, 40]. Poggio and colleagues [17] postulated that, in UT Z. perennis, the IV are formed by pairing of homologous chromosomes from A genomes (ApApAp´Ap´), while the II are formed by pairing of genomes B p1 (Bp1Bp1) and genomes Bp2 (Bp2Bp2), respectively (Fig 5).
Z. perennis treated with colchicine shows up to 10IV indicating homoeology between genomes Ap (ApApAp´Ap´) and between genomes Bp (Bp1Bp1Bp2Bp2), but any homology among them. The pairing between Bp1 and Bp2 was confirmed by GISH in the Z. perennis x maize hybrids by Gonzalez and colleagues [24]. This strongly suggests that in UT Z. perennis studied in the present work, homoeologous pairing between the genomes Bp1 and Bp2 is prevented by a pairing regulator gene. However, the presence in high frequency of 5IV in UT individuals suggest that this genes would not affect the A genomes. This could be explained if A genomes are highly homologous, and more divergence in these genomes is required for the suppression of the homoeologous pairing. These results would indicate that the PrZ gene would affect independently the genomes A and B in Z. perennis, being relevant the threshold of homology and the fidelity of pairing between genomes A (Ap and Ap´) and between genomes B (Bp1 and Bp2). The meiotic analysis of both genomes leads to conclude that Z. perennis is a combination of an intervarietal autotetraploid (A genomes) combined with a segmental allopolyploid (B genomes) in a same nucleus.
When Z. m. ssp. parviglumis (2n = 20) was treated with colchicine 0.5mM, no IV were observed, being 10II the meiotic configuration observed in Profase I, as was reported in treated Z. diploperennis by Poggio and colleagues [17]. In these tetraploid species, colchicine do not affect the meiotic behaviour, unlike what was observed in maize and the Bp genomes of Z. perennis, which showed up to five and up to ten IV, respectively. This could be explained if genomes Ax and Bx of Z. m. ssp. parviglumis and Z. diploperennis are differentiated and do not have regions prone to pair. Then, the absence of IV in treated Z. m. ssp. parviglumis and Z. diploperennis could be due to a real lack of homoeology between genomes A and B. On this basis, Z. m. ssp. parviglumis and Z. diploperennis would be typical genomic allopolyploids while maize is a segmental allopolyploid (Fig 5).
The 2n = 30 hybrids Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays and Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis studied in this work showed, at meiosis of UT individuals, 5III+5II+5I as the most frequent chromosome configuration at MI. GISH experiments enabled the recognition of the genomic source of each chromosome involved in the meiotic configuration of the hybrids Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays [24]. In this way, it was demonstrate that trivalents are formed by two chromosomes of genomes Ap (ApAp´) of Z. perennis and one chromosome of genome A (Am) of 2n = 20 parental, bivalents are formed by autosyndetic pairing of genomes Bp1 and Bp2 of Z. perennis, and univalents correspond to the genome Bm of maize [24 and present work]. Similar results were obtained in the hybrids Z. perennis x Z. luxurians [20]. All these results confirmed that genomes Bp1 and Bp2, that do not pair in Z. perennis, are homoeologous and form bivalents in the hexaploid hybrids which possesses only one doses of Ax, Bx, Bp1 and Bp2. This indicate that the PrZ-pairing regulator gene proposed for maize and Z. perennis is less efficient in dihaploid condition, as it was reported in dihaploids of Brassica and diploid hybrids of Glandularia [1, 13, 14]. Thus, all these results lead to postulated that PrZ preclude homoeologous pairing when homoeologous genomes are in two doses in the polyploids (Bp1Bp1Bp2Bp2) but are inefficient when homoeologous genomes Bp1 and Bp2 are in one dose in the hybrids.
When the hexaploid hybrid Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis was treated with colchicine 0.5 mM, up to 10III were observed. The same result was obtained in the hybrids Z. perennis x Z. diploperennis [17] and other hexaploid hybrids [43]. The absence of IV or VI in treated Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. parviglumis is congruent with the lack of IV in treated Z. m. ssp. parviglumis, and reinforces that the genomes Apa and Bpa of Z. parviglumis are not homoeologous between them (Fig 5).
Hexaploid hybrids Z. perennis x Z. m. ssp. mays treated with colchicine presented VI, IV and III at MI, these configurations differs notoriously from those observed in all the treated hexaploid hybrids involving Z. perennis and teosintes as parentals, where only III were observed. This result it is not unexpected and is explained by the homoeology found between genomes Am and Bm of maize (Fig 5). This homoeology was demonstrated by pairing in dihaploids (AmBm) and the formation of IV in treated material of maize (AmAmBmBm).
Cytological diploidization by restriction of pairing and/or genetical divergence of homoeologous chromosomes
Although the presence of pairing regulator genes is common in hybrids and polyploids, the mechanisms involved in this control were focusing on Ph1 locus of wheat. Apart from this system, little is known about the activity of genes that contribute to the cytological diploidization of allopolyploids. It was postulated that Ph1 of wheat exerts its effect at premeiotic stages controlling the presynaptic alignment of chromosomes. Moreover, it was demonstrated that different doses of Ph1 influences the distance between homologous and homoeologous chromosomes [8]. Besides, these authors demonstrated that colchicine phenocopies the effect of increased doses of Ph1 in premeiotic cells and postulated that the resemblance between the effect of Ph1 and colchicine lead to the assumption that microtubules are the subcellular target of Ph1.
Interestingly, Feldman and Levy [8] showed that, in hexaploid wheat, each ancestral genome occupies a separate region in the nucleus, which in turn, is recognized by Ph1. In polyploid species and hybrids of Glandularia, pairing regulator genes affecting the distance between nuclear site attachments of its two parental genomes was also proposed [13]. The studies carried out so far in different plants seem to indicate that different doses of pairing regulator genes affect the distance between nuclear site attachments of ancestral or parental homoeologous genomes of polyploid species [8]. Moreover, there are many evidences indicating that Ph–like genes are also evolved in important meiotic mechanisms related with pairing and recombination [1, 6].
In Zea it could be postulated that the PrZ would affect the distance between the nuclear site attachment of its two ancestral genomes, A and B, restricting the pairing between their chromosomes. Now it is known that the spatial separation of homoeologous, parental or ancestral genomes in hybrids and polyploids species is a very common phenomenon [44, 45]. Moreover, it is interesting to point out that the spatial separation of relict homoeologous genomes of Zea, could restricts pairing between their chromosomes [22].
In the tetraploids teosintes Z. diploperennis and Z. m. ssp. parviglumis colchicine treatments do not reveal any homeology between genomes Ax and Bx. These results lead to the conclusion that, in these species, the diploidized meiotic behaviour could be achieved by the divergence of homoeologous chromosomes belonging to genomes A and B. On these bases, Z. diploperennis and Z. m. ssp. parviglumis could be considered genomic allopolyploid.
The divergence between homoeologous genomes could be explained by the process of genetic diploidization, phenomena that occurs when genomes of different species are combined together within a single nucleus, such as in hybridization and polyploidy. This revolutionary process, where the genetic redundancy is erased, triggers gene silencing, gene elimination and/or transposon activation via genetic and epigenetic alterations [2, 3, 5, 46].
The cytological diploidization by restriction of pairing between homoeologous chromosomes or by genetical divergence of the homoeologous chromosomes are independent but complementary systems and could be acting jointly in the same nucleus. The effect of PrZ on the genomes A and B could be different depending fundamentally on the threshold of homology within them.
In Z. perennis both processes of cytological diplodization, divergence and pairing regulator genes, are complementary. In this alloautopolyploid a genetic system precluding pairing between genomes B was described in the present work. Besides, there are evidences of genetic diploidization such as genome downsizing and lost of repetitive sequences [40].
Although Pr genes are not a prerequisite for regular disomic inheritance, they would be selected because enhance polyploid fitness [1, 4, 7]. Thus, pairing regulator genes could promote and speed the time required for correct chromosomal segregation becomes established. Once regular disomic inheritance is established by Pr genes, divergence between homoeologous chromosomes will become exacerbated and Pr genes could be retained or lost. Even though these genes could be lost in the process of divergence, it is hardly possible to consider that pairing regulator genes were retained in Zea species that have undergone divergence between homoeologous genomes such as Z. diploperennis and Z. m. ssp. parviglumis. This presumption is based on the fact that the molecular and cell biological characterization of Ph1-wheat suggested that these genes are a master coordinator gene that is involved in conserved meiotic processes across the Kingdoms [6].
This work provide new insight into the processes and genetic control of diploid-like meiotic behaviour in ancient polyploids from genus Zea and lead to discuss how correct chromosome segregation could be ensured in autopolyploid, allopolyploid and alloautopolyploid species. The cytological diplodization is an essential process for understand polyploid speciation since the evolution of polyploid species is closely linked to the nature of meiotic stabilization.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dra. María Rosa Ferrari and Dra. Liliana Mola for their helpful comments on this manuscript, and M. Sc. Carlos Skorupka for the statistical assistance. This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (PICT N° 2010–1665); University of Buenos Aires (UBACYT N° 20020130100694BA) and National Council of Scientific Research of Argentina (PIP N° 11220120100107CO).
References
- 1.
Jenczewski E, Mercier R, Macaisne N, Mezard C. Meiosis: Recombination and the control of cell division. In: Plant Genome Diversity, Eds. Leitch IJ et al. Springer-Verlag; 2013. Vol. 2:121–136.
- 2. Alix K, Gérard PR, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. An Bot. 2017. 120: 183–194.
- 3. Soltis DE, Clayton JV, Soltis PS. The polyploidy revolution then and now: Stebbins revisited. Am J Bot. 2014. 101: 1057–1078. pmid:25049267
- 4. Jenczewski E, Alix K. From diploids to allopolyploids: the emergence of efficient pairing control genes in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2004. 23: 21–45.
- 5. Ma XF, Gustafson JP. Genome evolution of allopolyploids: a process of cytological and genetic diploidization. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005. 109: 236–249. pmid:15753583
- 6. Cifuentes M, Grandont L, Moore G, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E. Genetic regulation of meiosis in polyploid species: new insights into an old question. New Phytol. 2010. 186: 29–36. pmid:19912546
- 7. Le Comber SC, Ainouche ML, Kovarik A, Leitch AR. Making a functional diploid: from polysomic to disomic inheritance. New Phytol. 2010. 186: 113–22. pmid:20028473
- 8. Feldman M, Levy AA. Genome evolution due to allopolyploidization in wheat. Genetics. 2012. 192: 763–774. pmid:23135324
- 9. Bhullar R, Nagarajan R, Bennypaul H, Sidhu GK, Sidhu G, Rustgi S, Gill KS. Silencing of a metaphase I-specific gene results in a phenotype similar to that of the Pairing homoeologous 1 (Ph1) gene mutations. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2014. 111: 14187–14192.
- 10. Mikhailova EI, Naranjo T, Shepherd K, Wennekes-van Eden J, Heyting C, De Jong JH. The effect of the wheat Ph1 locus on chromatin organisation and meiotic chromosome pairing analysed by genome painting. Chromosoma. 1998. 107: 339–350. pmid:9880767
- 11. Colas I, Shaw P, Prieto P, Wanous M, Spielmeyer W, Mago R, Moore G. Effective chromosome pairing requires chromatin remodeling at the onset of meiosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2008. 105: 6075–6080.
- 12. Zhou A, Pawlowski WP. Regulation of meiotic gene expression in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2014. 5: 413. pmid:25202317
- 13. Poggio L, Greizerstein E, Ferrari M. Variability in the amount of homoeologous pairing among F1 hybrids. AoB PLANTS. 2016. 8: plw030; pmid:27255515
- 14. Jenczewski E, Eber F, Grimaud A, Huet S, Lucas MO, Monod H, Chèvre AM. PrBn, a major gene controlling homoeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids. Genetics. 2003. 164: 645–653. pmid:12807785
- 15. Naranjo CA, Molina MC, Poggio L. Evidencias de un numero básico x = 5 en el género Zea y su importancia en estudios del origen del maíz. Acad. Nac. Cs. Ex. Fís. Nat., Buenos Aires, Monografía. 1990. 5: 43–53.
- 16. Naranjo CA, Poggio L, Molina MC, Bernatené E. Increase in multivalent frequency in F1 hybrids of Zea diploperennis × Zea perennis by colchicine treatment. Hereditas. 1994. 120: 241–244.
- 17. Poggio L, Molina MC, Naranjo CA. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Zea. 2. Colchicine-induced multivalents. Theor Appl Genet. 1990. 79: 461–464. pmid:24226448
- 18. Poggio L, Confalonieri V, Comas C, Gonzalez G, Naranjo CA. Genomic affinities of Zea luxurians, Z. diploperennis and Z. perennis: meiotic behaviour of their F1 hybrids and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Genome. 1999a. 42: 993–1000.
- 19. Poggio L, Confalonieri V, Comas C, Cuadrado A, Jouve N, Naranjo CA. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) of Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea mays ssp. mays with B chromosomes. Genome. 1999b. 42: 687–691.
- 20. Poggio L, Confalonieri V, Comas C, González G, Naranjo CA. Evolutionary relationships in the genus Zea: analysis of repetitive sequences used as cytological FISH and GISH markers. Gen Mol Biol. 2000a. 23: 1021–1027.
- 21. Poggio L, Confalonieri V, Gonzalez G, Comas C, Naranjo CA. Aportes de la citogenética molecular al análisis de divergencias genómicas crípticas en el género Zea (Poaceae). Bol Soc Argent Bot. 2000b. 35: 297–304.
- 22. Poggio L, González GE, Confalonieri V, Comas C, Naranjo CA. The genome organization and diversification of maize and its allied species revisited: evidences from classical and FISH-GISH cytogenetics analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005. 109: 259–267. pmid:15753585
- 23. González GE, Confalonieri V, Comas C, Naranjo CA, Poggio L. GISH reveals cryptic genetic differences between maize and its putative wild progenitor Zea mays ssp. parviglumis. Genome. 2004. 47: 947–953. pmid:15499408
- 24. González GE, Comas C, Confalonieri V, Naranjo CA, Poggio L. Genomic affinities between maize and Zea perennis using classical and molecular cytogenetic (GISH-FISH). Chrom Res 2006. 14: 629–635. pmid:16964569
- 25. González GE, Poggio L. Karyotype of Zea luxurians and Zea mays ssp. mays using DAPI/FISH and meiotic behavior of hybrids. Genome. 2011. 54: 26–32. pmid:21217803
- 26. Driscoll CJ, Darvey NL. Chromosome pairing: effect of colchicine on an isochromosome. Science 1970. 169: 290–291. pmid:5450358
- 27. Jackson RC, Murray BG. Colchicine-induced quadrivalent formation in Helianthus: evidence of ancient polyploidy. Theor Appl Genet. 1983. 64: 219–222. pmid:24264948
- 28.
Feldman M, Avivi l. Genetic control of bivalent pairing in common wheat: the mode of Ph1 action. Kew Chromosome Conference III, ed. Brandham PE. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London. 1988. pp.269–279.
- 29. Vega JM, Feldman M. Effect of the pairing gene Ph1 and premeiotic colchicine treatment on intra and interchromosome pairing of isochromosomes in common wheat. Genetics. 1998. 150: 1199–1208. pmid:9799271
- 30. Cowan CR, Cande WZ. Meiotic telomere clustering is inhibited by colchicine but does not require cytoplasmic microtubules. J Cell Sci. 2002. 115: 3747–3756. pmid:12235285
- 31. Moore G, Devos KM, Wang Z, Gale MD. Cereal genome evolution. Grasses, line up and form a circle. Curr Biol. 1995. 5: 737:739. pmid:7583118
- 32. Gaut BS, Doebley JF. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1997. 94: 6809–6814.
- 33. White S, Doebley J. Of genes and genomes and the origin of maize. Trends Genet. 1998. 14: 327–332. pmid:9724966
- 34. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. TREE. 1999. 14: 48–352.
- 35. Swigonova Z, Lai J, Ma J, Ramakrishna W, Llaca V, Bennetzen JL, Messing J. On the tetraploid origin of the maize genome. Comp Funct Genomics. 2004. 5: 281–284. pmid:18629160
- 36. Wei F, Coe E, Nelson W, et al. Physical and genetic structure of the maize genome reflects its complex evolutionary history. PLOS Genetics. 2007. pmid:17658954
- 37. Schnable JC, Springer NM, Freeling M. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2011. 108: 4069–74.
- 38.
Correa J. Duplicación cromosómica en haploides de maíz (Zea mays L.): efecto del método de duplicación y de la dosis de colchicina sobre distintos grupos heteróticos. Mgs Thesis Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina. 2006.
- 39. Poggio L, Rosato M, Mazoti LB, Naranjo CA. Variable meiotic behavior among plants of an alloplasmic line of maize. Cytologia. 1997. 62: 271–274.
- 40. González GE, Poggio L. Genomic affinities revealed by GISH suggests intergenomic restructuring between parental genomes of the paleopolyploid genus Zea. Genome. 2015. 58: 433–439. pmid:26506040
- 41. McClintock B. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the midprofhase of meiosis in Zea mays. Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1933. 19: 191–237.
- 42. Ting YC. Meiosis and fertility of anther culture-derived maize plant. Maydica. 1985. 30: 161–169.
- 43.
Molina MC. Estudios citogenéticos evolutivos del género Zea. Phd Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain. 2011. Available from: https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/9912/tesisUPV3467.pdf
- 44. Ding L, Zhao ZG, Ge XH, Li ZY. Different timing and spatial separation of parental chromosomes in intergeneric somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Orychophragmus violaceus. Genet Mol Res. 2014. 13: 1618–2611.
- 45. Han J, Zhou B, Shan W, Yu L, Wu W, Wang K. A and D genomes spatial separation at somatic metaphase in tetraploid cotton: evidence for genomic disposition in a polyploid plant. Plant J. 2015. 84: 1167–77. pmid:26568399
- 46.
Jones RN, Langdon T. The plant nucleus at war and peace: genome organization in the interphase nucleus. In: Plant Genome Diversity, Eds. Leitch IJ et al. Springer-Verlag. 2013. Vol. 2:13–31.