http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-3423
Figures
Abstract
Background
Rahnella aquatilis is ubiquitous and its certain strains have the applicative potent as a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. R. aquatilis HX2 is a biocontrol agent to produce antibacterial substance (ABS) and showed efficient biocontrol against crown gall caused by Agrobacterium vitis on sunflower and grapevine plants. The regulatory network of the ABS production and biocontrol activity is still limited known.
Methodology/Principal findings
In this study, a transposon-mediated mutagenesis strategy was used to investigate the regulators that involved in the biocontrol activity of R. aquatilis HX2. A 366-nt noncoding RNA CsrB was identified in vitro and in vivo, which regulated ABS production and biocontrol activity against crown gall on sunflower plants, respectively. The predicted product of noncoding RNA CsrB contains 14 stem-loop structures and an additional ρ-independent terminator harpin, with 23 characteristic GGA motifs in the loops and other unpaired regions. CsrB is required for ABS production and biocontrol activity in the biocontrol regulation by a two-component regulatory system BarA/UvrY in R. aquatilis HX2.
Citation: Mei L, Xu S, Lu P, Lin H, Guo Y, Wang Y (2017) CsrB, a noncoding regulatory RNA, is required for BarA-dependent expression of biocontrol traits in Rahnella aquatilis HX2. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0187492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187492
Editor: Gautam Chaudhuri, Meharry Medical College, UNITED STATES
Received: January 7, 2017; Accepted: October 21, 2017; Published: November 1, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Mei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200386) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY12C14006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
All organisms contain a wealth of noncoding regulatory RNAs (ncRNAs) that function in a variety of cellular processes [1]. The ncRNAs play key roles in many physiological and adaptive responses in bacteria. The ncRNAs act at the post-transcriptional level and utilize less energy and time for synthesis and turnover [2]. It is more advantageous that bacteria use ncRNA-mediated responses than the regulation by protein transcriptional factors in the rapidly changing environments [3]. Most of the known ncRNAs are divided into two categories: cis-encoded ncRNAs that are transcribed in the antisense orientation to their target protein-encoding mRNA, and trans-encoded ncRNAs that are transcribed from intergenic regions with multiple targets [3]. Numerous ncRNAs have been described in Escherichia coli and were estimated to several hundred on the basis of genome sequences [4].
In E. coli, ncRNAs (e.g., CsrB and CsrC) have a high affinity for certain RNA-binding proteins that act as translational repressors. For example, CsrA, a carbon storage regulator, is a recently discovered as a global regulatory system that controls bacterial gene expression on the post-transcriptional level [5, 6]. Repeated ANGGA motifs (N is any nucleotide) in target mRNAs are binding sites for CsrA [5]. Translation of the mRNA was repressed when the most distal of such motifs coincided with the ribosome-binding sites [7]. The noncoding regulatory Csr RNAs have flower-like secondary structures with multiple GGA motifs in unpaired regions. The regulatory ncRNAs containing multiple CsrA binding sites within the loops of predicted stem-loops competed with mRNAs for CsrA binding, thus antagonized CsrA activity [8]. Homologs of CsrA (e.g. RsmA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were highly conserved and identified in diverse bacteria to play key roles in biofilm formation and dispersal [9] as well as in regulating virulence factors of animal and plant pathogens [10–14]. In the proteobacteria, most of the bacterial species having CsrA homologs also contained the homologs of BarA and/or UvrY (e.g. the GacA–GacS two component system in P. aeruginosa) and their interaction network among these proteins has been studied in several bacterium species [3]. Besides these pathogenic bacteria, ncRNAs have also been demonstrated in the certain plant-beneficial soil bacteria. Three ncRNAs including RsmY, RsmZ, and RsmX were key factors to relieve RsmA-mediated regulation of secondary metabolism and biocontrol traits in the GacS/GacA cascade of P. fluorescens CHA0 [15–17]. The ncRNAs mutants in P. fluorescens CHA0 were strongly impaired in its biocontrol properties in a cucumber-Pythium ultimum microcosm [15].
The gram-negative bacterium Rahnella aquatilis is ubiquitous and its certain strains have the applicative potents as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. The functions of R. aquatilis, including fixing nitrogen, solubilize mineral phosphate, and biocontrol activity were described previously [18–22]. The nonpathogenic strain R. aquatilis HX2 was isolated from vineyard soils and showed to suppress grapevine crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium vitis [19, 20]. The biocontrol ability of strain HX2 was related to the production of an antibacterial substance (ABS) and exhibited a broad spectrum of inhibition activity against phytopathogenic bacteria for ABS production regulation by pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) and the BarA/UvrY two component regulatory system [23–25]. Here, a transposon-mediated mutagenesis strategy was used to investigate the factors that regulated the biocontrol activity of R. aquatilis HX2. A novel regulatory ncRNA was identified, located and characterized. The relevance of this regulatory ncRNA to growth and beneficial activities of strain HX2 are assessed with respect to antibacterial activity and biocontrol activity of sunflower crown gall disease.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. R. aquatilis strains were cultured at 28°C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium or with agitation (170 rpm) in potato-dextrose broth (PDB) [20]. E. coli strains were grown at 37°C on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Agrobacterium vitis strain K308 was grown either on yeast extract broth YEB or YEB agar at 28°C [26]. When required, the growth of R. aqautilis and E. coli were performed in media with the filter-sterilized antibiotics (50 μg ml-1 kanamycin; 50 μg ml-1 ampicillin; 20 μg ml-1 tetracycline; 5 μg ml-1 gentamicin).
General genetic manipulation
Isolation of genomic DNA from strain HX2 and plasmid DNA from E. coli was performed according to standard procedures [27]. Restriction enzyme digestions were carried out as recommended by the manufacture (TaKaRa, Japan) while ligations were applied T4 DNA ligase (TaKaRa). Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Japan) was used for PCR amplification of inserts. DNA sequencing was performed (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Beijing, China) and analyzed by using BLAST server of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Primers was designed according to the whole genome sequence of R. aquatilis HX2 (accession number CP003403-6) [28] and listed in Supporting Information file (S1 Table).
Transposon mutagenesis and screening of ABS-deficient mutants
Tn5 mutagenesis of strain HX2 was accomplished by conjugal mating with E. coli S17-1(pUTkm1) [29]. Transconjugants grown within 48 to 60 h were assayed for inhibiting growth of A. vitis strain K308 in vitro as previously described [19]. The mini-Tn5-disrupted genes in these transconjugants were identified by cloning and sequencing the genomic DNA fragments flanking the transposon.
Determination of CsrB 5’-end
The 5’-end of csrB transcript was mapped by rapid amplification of its cDNA end (RACE) [30]. Briefly, total RNA from strain HX2 was extracted from cells collected at late stationary phase. Reverse transcription (RT) reaction was performed using First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (TaKaRa) according to the instruction. T4 RNA ligase (Promaga was used to anchor a 5’-phosphorylated, 3’-end ddATP-blocked oligonucleotide DT88 (P-DT88-ddATP) to the single-stranded cDNA. The resulting ligation mixture was used in the subsequent semi-nested PCRs. The anchor-ligated cDNA was amplified with primers DT89 (anchor-specific primer) and csrBRA1, followed by amplification with primer DT89 and the internal primer TRR11. A 228-bp amplicon was purified and blunt-end cloned into the plasmid pBS (Table 1). Three independent clones were selected and sequenced.
Construction of csrB in-frame deletion mutant
In-frame deletions of csrB were constructed utilizing a two-step homologous recombination strategy [31]. Primers were designed based on the upstream and downstream of csrB sequences for PCR fragment amplification from the genome of HX2 (Table 1). Briefly, primers csrBKO1 and csrBKO2 were used to amplify a 1042-bp region upstream of csrB while another 1104-bp fragment created by primers csrBKO3 and csrBKO4 is the downstream of csrB. The primer csrBKO2 shares the identical 22-bp oligonucleotides with the primer csrBKO3. A PCR-after-ligation was performed after mixture with these above amplified DNA fragments using the primer csrBKO1and csrBKO4 for generation of a 214-bp deletion site within 2124-bp csrB fragment. PCR reactions was initiated at 15 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 45 sec at 94°C, 40 sec at 66°C and 1 min at 72°C, and performed final extension at 72°C for 10 min. After being digested with Not I, the DNA fragment was ligated into pSR47S to obtain pSRΔcsrB [32]. This suicide plasmid was transformed into the E. coli DH5α (λ-pir) and mobilized from DH5α (λ-pir) into the wild-type R. aquatilis strain HX2 by triparental mating with helper plasmid pRK600 [33]. Exoconjugates were selected on ABM agar plates containing kanamycin and second recombination events were chose according to the previous methods [23].
Genetic complementation of the CsrB mutant
To complement the CsrB mutant, a 1300-bp csrBCO1 and csrBCO2 amplified DNA fragment containing the csrB was cloned into the broad host range vector pRK415G resulting in the complementation plasmid pRKcsrB (Table 1). The plasmid pRKcsrB was mobilized into the MR57 or MR61 strain by tri-parental mating for complementation.
Construction of a csrB-lacZ fusion
A reporter plasmid was constructed carrying a transcriptional csrB-lacZ fusion in which the +1 nucleotide of lacZ corresponds to the +1 nucleotide of the csrB promoter. The csrB promoter was PCR-amplified with primers csrBPR1 and csrBPR2. PCR products were digested with BamH I and Pst I and ligated to pML122 to produce the construct pMLcsrBlac that was confirmed by sequencing.
Antibiosis test in vitro and biocontrol crown gall disease in greenhouse
The antagonist R. aquatilis HX2 and its derivative strains were tested for antibiosis in vitro against pathogenic strain A. vitis K308 via a modified Stonier′s method [19]. Biocontrol activity assays were performed on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Frankasol) stems with two true leaves grown in a greenhouse. Briefly, the suspension of pathogenic bacterial strain K308 (ca. 2 ×108 CFU ml-1) was mixed with an equal volume of HX2 and/or its derivative strains suspension (ca. 2 × 108 CFU ml-1). A 10-μl suspension drop of bacterial mixture was injected into a 1.0 cm longitudinal incision in sunflower stem. The inoculation site was wrapped with Parafilm and incubated for 15 days post-inoculation (dpi). Thereafter, galls were formed and excised to weigh biomass. Sterile buffered saline (SBS, 0.85% NaCl) was applied as a negative control while K308 mixed with SBS was served as a positive control. The effectiveness index (EI) was calculated using the following formula: EI (%) = [(C-T)/C]×100, where C is the mean fresh weight of the crown gall tumor of the positive control group and T is the mean fresh weight of the crown gall tumor in the treated group. The assay was independently performed with four replicates containing 10 plants per treatment.
qPCR analysis
Bacterial strains were grown in PDB and total RNA was isolated by using the TRI reagent method and Turbo DNA-free DNase kits (TaKaRa) as suggested. cDNA was synthesized with 0.5 μg of total RNA as template. qPCR was performed to quantify the transcriptional level of target genes in different samples using RT Master Mix (TaKaRa) and the qTOWER 2.0/2.2 Real Time PCR System (Analytik Jena, Germany) following the protocols of manufactures. The rplU was used as the endogenous control for data analysis. Data were analyzed using Relative Expression Software Tool [34].
Results
Isolation and characterization of an ABS-deficient mutants in R. aquatilis HX2
A total number of 2140 mini Tn5-induced mutants of R. aquatilis HX2 with kanamycin resistance were assayed for ABS production. A mutant TR61 that significantly reduced the inhibition of R. aquatilis HX2 against A. vitis K308 on PDA plates was obtained (Table 2). A single Tn5 insertion was present in TR61 by Southern blotting and further indicated by a single hybridizing band upon digestion with Kpn I, Sal I, or Pst I (data not shown). Physiological and biochemical characteristics between HX2 and TR61 were partially not different [35]. All data showed consistent to wild-type strain HX2 for catalase, citrate utilization, Voges-Proskauer, and D-glucose oxidation, and they exhibited negative reaction for oxidase or methyl red (Table 2). Particularly, the mutant TR61, exhibited to reduce biological control ability to grapevine crown gall with 14.2 of EI of the strain TR61 compared to 96.3 of EI of wild type strain HX2.
Charaterization of a small noncoding RNA CsrB in R. aquatilis
Genomic DNA was digested with Hind III and ligated for transformation by E. coli DH5a. The resulting plasmids of E. coli colonies with kanamycin resistance were screened by PCR. The flanking sequence of Tn5 transposon in TR61 mutant resulted in an unknown locus (Fig 1A). This locus did not appear to contain any open reading frames and has a potential ρ-independent terminator (Fig 1B). Transcriptional start site of this locus was mapped and identified by RACE (Data not shown). Analysis using Ribosome Binding site calculator v 2.0 [36] indicates that this locus is unlikely to be translated because typical rates of translation were absent using all possible start codons. A model of computing-simulated folding [37] of this 366-nt locus transcript at 28°C was predicted 14 stem-loop structures and another ρ-independent terminator harpin with 23 characteristic GGA motifs in the loops and other unpaired regions. Modeled secondary structure was resembled like the noncoding regulatory CsrB in E. coli. Therefore, csrB was referred to this locus in R. aquatilis HX2.
(A) The region of R. aquatilis HX2 with csrB, yjhB and an unknown gene. T1, T2 and T3 are ρ-independent terminators. The mini-Tn5 inserted site in R. aquatilis TR57 was pointed by the triangle. (B) Predicted secondary structure of CsrB at 28°C using the MFOLD program (Zuker et al., 1999; http://www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/applications/mfold/old/rna/form1-2.3.cgi). AGGA and AGGGA motifs are in bold.
CsrB is associated with ABS production and biocontrol in R. aquatilis
This locus referring to the CsrB RNA was disrupted by the homologous recombination and generated mutant strain MR61. The mutant was verified by PCR and DNA sequencing by the outside flanking region from the according mutants (data not shown). Mutant MR61 exhibited reduced the ability of inhibiting growth of A. vitis K308 (Fig 2 and Table 2). Strain MR61csrB, which is the complemented strain generated by plasmid pRKcsrB containing the csrB, displayed the similar or same phenotypes of A. vitis inhibition as wild type strain HX2 (Fig 2 and Table 2). To determine the function of the ncRNA CsrB in the biocontrol traits of R. aquatilis HX2, the biocontrol ability of strains were performed on the sunflower plants against gall disease caused by A. vitis K308. Strain HX2 caused to less infection in sunflower plants. However, the CsrB mutant strain MR61 exhibited deficient biocontrol activity to crown gall disease on sunflower plants with 12.5 and 96.3 of EI in MR61 and HX2, respectively (Fig 3, Table 2).
Shoots were inoculated by placing 10-μl drops of bacterial strains (108 CFU ml-1), alone or in equal-number mixtures, at sites in which wounds of 1.0-cm longitudinal incisions were made with a sterile scalpel. Tumor were readily apparent 7 weeks after inoculation. The treatments were SDW alone (Control), Agrobacterium vitis K308 alone (K308), R. aquatilis HX2 plus A. vitis K308 (HX2+K308), and R. aquatilis MR61 plus A. vitis K308 (MR61+K308).
CsrB is regulated by BarA in R. aquatilis HX2
The global regulator BarA, a sensor protein of a two-component regulatory system BarA/UvrY, had been found as a regulation gene functioning in bacterial biocontrol effects in R. aquatilis HX2 (Table 2) [25]. BarA regulateed small noncoding regulatory RNAs in many other bacteria including E. coli and P. fluorescens. To determine the regulatory of CsrB by BarA in R. aquatilis HX2, a transcriptional fusion was conducted by placing the lacZ gene precisely at the +1 site under the control of the csrB promoter in a vector that has two to five copies per cell [38]. The activity of the csrB promoter increased with cell density and was 11–15 times higher at the late stationary phase in wild-type strain HX2 than BarA mutant (Fig 4A), which confirmed that the BarA/UvrY system is strongly involved in csrB transcription. Meanwhile, effect of BarA on the transcription of csrB was further examined by qPCR. Results showed that, compared with the wild type strain HX2 in PDB medium (normalized to 1), a significantly (p<0.01) lower level of csrB was observed in the BarA mutant strain MR57 without pRKbarA but no significant difference was observed in strain MR57 within pRKbarA (Fig 4B). In addition, the antagonism assay results showed that both BarA and CsrB restored the inhibition activity of BarA mutant MR57 in vitro (Table 2). However, BarA failed to restore the inhibition activity of the CsrB mutant MR61 (Table 2). These results suggested that CsrB is a part of the BarA/UvrY regulation of strain HX2 and required for the biocontrol regulation by BarA/UvrY regulation.
(A) Activation of csrB transcription by BarA. β-galactosidase activities of a transcriptional rsmB-lacZ fusion carried by pMLcsrBlac were determined in the wild type (HX2; circles) and a barA mutant (MR57; squares). (B) The relative level of ncRNA CsrB in Rahnella aquatilis MR57 with or without pRKbarA grown for 12 h in PDB medium. The amount of mRNA was determined by qPCR. Three replicates were used in this experiment. Data with the different letters are significantly different (P<0.05).
Discussion
R. aquatilis HX2 is a biocontrol agent, and showed to inhibit the growth of phytopathogenic bateria including A. tumefaciens, A. rhizogenes, A. vitis, Pectobacterium carotovorum, Xanthomonas campestris, X. oryzae, Pseudomonas syringae, and Clavibacter michiganensis [19, 20]. Biocontrol activity of strain HX2 has been investigated for A. vitis in sunflowers and grapes in the greenhouse [20]. Moreover, biocontrol activity has been found to directly relate to the production of the antibacterial substance (ABS). In this study, a ncRNA (designated CsrB) was identified that transcription of this ncRNA is activated by the BarA/UvrY two-component system and positively regulated the production of ABS with the biocontrol activity. The predicted product of csrB was detected as an approximately 366-nt single transcript. Mutational inactivation of CsrB led to less production of ABS, leading to reduce biocontrol ability and similar properties of BarA mutant. The csrB promoter was also positively regulated by the BarA/UvrY system.
The ncRNAs act as the regulators of various cellular processes in bacteria [3]. These regulatory elements, also termed ribo-regulators, were categorized into several classes [39]. One class comprised the riboregulators that are able to establish base pairing with target mRNAs (e.g., DsrA, RprA, Spot42, MicF, UptR and RhyB) in E. coli [5, 40–42]. Such RNAs modified the behavior of the target mRNA upon binding under the assistance of the RNA-binding protein Hfq [39, 43]. A second important group of riboregulators, including CsrB and CsrC in E. coli [44, 45], CsrB in S. typhimurium [10], RsmB in Erwinia spp. [14] and RsmZ (PrrB) in P. fluorescens [46, 47], were antagonists of small translational regulators (CsrA, RsmA). The CsrB and CsrC RNAs of E. coli modulated the activity of CsrA, an RNA-binding protein that regulated carbon usage upon entry into stationary phase and other nutrient-poor conditions [48]. CsrA dimers binded to GGA motifs in the 5’-UTR of target mRNAs, thereby affected the stability and/or translation of the mRNA [48]. Each CsrB and CsrC RNAs contained multiple GGA binding sites. Thus, the ncRNAs effectively kept the CsrA protein away from mRNA leaders. Transcription of the csrB and csrC genes was induced by the BarA/UvrB two-component regulators when cells encountered nutrient-poor growth conditions though the signal for this induction is unknown.
Our previous results showed that ABS production and biocontrol activity in R. aquatilis HX2, which were regulated by PQQ and the BarA/UvrY two component regulatory system [23–25]. In the current study, a novel ncRNA CsrB in R. aquatilis HX2 was further confirmed to play regulatory role in the ABS production and biocontrol activity against A. vitis on sunflower plants (Fig 5). Future research will be aimed at deciphering the network referring to ABS production and biocontrol activity as well as the genes regulated by the ncRNA CsrB.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Yue Liang (Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China) for his valuable comments and critical review of this manuscript. We thank Dr. Liqin Zhang and Dr. Anliang Chen (Department of Forest Protection, Zhejiang A&F University, Lin’An, China) for their assistance with this work.
References
- 1. Eddy SR. Non-coding RNA genes and the modern RNA world. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2001;2(12):919–929. pmid:11733745
- 2. Harfouche L, Haichar Fel Z, Achouak W. Small regulatory RNAs and the fine-tuning of plant-bacteria interactions. The New Phytologist. 2015;206(1):98–106. pmid:25866855
- 3. Waters LS, Storz G. Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell. 2009;136(4):615–628. pmid:19239884
- 4. Vogel J, Sharma CM. How to find small non-coding RNAs in bacteria. Biological Chemistry. 2005;386(12):1219–1238. pmid:16336117
- 5. Majdalani N, Vanderpool CK, Gottesman S. Bacterial small RNA regulators. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2005;40(2):93–113. pmid:15814430
- 6. Romeo T. Global regulation by the small RNA-binding protein CsrA and the non-coding RNA molecule CsrB. Molecular Microbiology. 1998;29(6):1321–1330. pmid:9781871
- 7. Dubey AK, Baker CS, Romeo T, Babitzke P. RNA sequence and secondary structure participate in high-affinity CsrA-RNA interaction. RNA. 2005;11(10):1579–1587. pmid:16131593
- 8. Romeo T, Vakulskas CA, Babitzke P. Post-transcriptional regulation on a global scale: form and function of Csr/Rsm systems. Environmental Microbiology. 2013;15(2):313–324. pmid:22672726
- 9. Jackson DW, Suzuki K, Oakford L, Simecka JW, Hart ME, Romeo T. Biofilm formation and dispersal under the influence of the global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184(1):290–301. pmid:11741870
- 10. Altier C, Suyemoto M, Ruiz AI, Burnham KD, Maurer R. Characterization of two novel regulatory genes affecting Salmonella invasion gene expression. Molecular Microbiology. 2000;35(3):635–646. pmid:10672185
- 11. Cui Y, Chatterjee A, Chatterjee AK. Effects of the two-component system comprising GacA and GacS of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora on the production of global regulatory rsmB RNA, extracellular enzymes, and harpinEcc. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2001;14(4):516–526. pmid:11310739
- 12. Heurlier K, Williams F, Heeb S, Dormond C, Pessi G, Singer D, et al. Positive control of swarming, rhamnolipid synthesis, and lipase production by the posttranscriptional RsmA/RsmZ system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004;186(10):2936–2945. pmid:15126453
- 13. Lenz DH, Miller MB, Zhu J, Kulkarni RV, Bassler BL. CsrA and three redundant small RNAs regulate quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;58(4):1186–1202. pmid:16262799
- 14. Ma W, Cui Y, Liu Y, Dumenyo CK, Mukherjee A, Chatterjee AK. Molecular characterization of global regulatory RNA species that control pathogenicity factors in Erwinia amylovora and Erwinia herbicola pv. gypsophilae. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001;183(6):1870–80. pmid:11222584
- 15. Kay E, Dubuis C, Haas D. Three small RNAs jointly ensure secondary metabolism and biocontrol in Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. PNAS. 2005;102(47):17136–17141. pmid:16286659
- 16. Reimmann C, Valverde C, Kay E, Haas D. Posttranscriptional repression of GacS/GacA-controlled genes by the RNA-binding protein RsmE acting together with RsmA in the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(1):276–285. pmid:15601712
- 17. Valverde C, Heeb S, Keel C, Haas D. RsmY, a small regulatory RNA, is required in concert with RsmZ for GacA-dependent expression of biocontrol traits in Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Molecular Microbiology. 2003;50(4):1361–1379. pmid:14622422
- 18. Calvo J, Calvente V, de Orellano ME, Benuzzi D, Sanz de Tosetti MI. Biological control of postharvest spoilage caused by Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea in apple by using the bacterium Rahnella aquatilis. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2007;113(3):251–257. pmid:17007950
- 19. Chen F, Guo YB, Wang JH, Li JY, Wang HM. Biological control of grape crown gall by Rahnella aquatilis HX2. Plant Disease. 2007;91(8):957–963.
- 20. Chen F, Li JY, Guo YB, Wang JH, Wang HM. Biological control of grapevine crown gall: purification and partial characterisation of an antibacterial substance produced by Rahnella aquatilis strain HX2. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2009;124(3):427–437.
- 21. El-Hendawy HH, Osman ME, Sorour NM. Characterization of two antagonistic strains of Rahnella aquatilis isolated from soil in Egypt. Folia Microbiologica. 2003;48(6):799–804. pmid:15058195
- 22. El-Hendawy HH, Osman ME, Sorour NM. Biological control of bacterial spot of tomato caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria by Rahnella aquatilis. Microbiological Research. 2005;160(4):343–352. pmid:16255138
- 23. Guo YB, Li J, Li L, Chen F, Wu W, Wang J, et al. Mutations that disrupt either the pqq or the gdh gene of Rahnella aquatilis abolish the production of an antibacterial substance and result in reduced biological control of grapevine crown gall. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75(21):6792–6803. pmid:19734331
- 24. Li L, Jiao Z, Hale L, Wu W, Guo Y. Disruption of gene pqqA or pqqB reduces plant growth promotion activity and biocontrol of crown gall disease by Rahnella aquatilis HX2. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e115010. pmid:25502691
- 25. Xiao F Z L.; Xie Z.; Guo Y.; Chen M.; Wang Y. Regulatory function of histidine kinase sensor encoding gene barA in bio-control effect of Rahnella aquatilis. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agric & Life Sci). 2015;41(1): 56–63.
- 26. Vervliet G, Holsters M, Teuchy H, Van Montagu M, Schell J. Characterization of different plaque-forming and defective temperate phages in Agrobacterium. The Journal of General Virology. 1975;26(1):33–48. pmid:1123610
- 27.
Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
- 28. Guo Y, Jiao Z, Li L, Wu D, Crowley DE, Wang Y, et al. Draft genome sequence of Rahnella aquatilis strain HX2, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium isolated from vineyard soil in Beijing, China. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194(23):6646–6647. pmid:23144397
- 29. Herrero M, de Lorenzo V, Timmis KN. Transposon vectors containing non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal insertion of foreign genes in gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology. 1990;172(11):6557–6567. pmid:2172216
- 30. Tillett D, Burns BP, Neilan BA. Optimized rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) for mapping bacterial mRNA transcripts. BioTechniques. 2000;28(3):448–456. pmid:10723556
- 31. Yan Q, Gao W, Wu XG, Zhang LQ. Regulation of the PcoI/PcoR quorum-sensing system in Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24 by the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system. Microbiology. 2009;155:124–133. pmid:19118353
- 32. Andrews HL, Vogel JP, Isberg RR. Identification of linked Legionella pneumophila genes essential for intracellular growth and evasion of the endocytic pathway. Infection and Immunity. 1998;66(3):950–958. pmid:9488381
- 33. Finan TM, Kunkel B, De Vos GF, Signer ER. Second symbiotic megaplasmid in Rhizobium meliloti carrying exopolysaccharide and thiamine synthesis genes. Journal of Bacteriology. 1986;167(1):66–72. pmid:3013840
- 34. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002;30:e36. pmid:11972351
- 35. Iimura K, Hosono A. Biochemical characteristics of Enterobacter agglomerans and related strains found in buckwheat seeds. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1996;30(3):243–253. pmid:8854178
- 36. Salis HM. The ribosome binding site calculator. Methods in Enzymology. 2011;498:19–42. pmid:21601672
- 37. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31(13):3406–3415. pmid:12824337
- 38. Labes M, Puhler A, Simon R. A new family of RSF1010-derived expression and lac-fusion broad-host-range vectors for gram-negative bacteria. Gene. 1990;89(1):37–46. pmid:2115488
- 39. Gottesman S. Stealth regulation: biological circuits with small RNA switches. Genes & Development. 2002;16(22):2829–2842.
- 40. Guigueno A, Dassa J, Belin P, Boquet PL. Oversynthesis of a new Escherichia coli small RNA suppresses export toxicity of DsbA'-PhoA unfoldable periplasmic proteins. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001;183(4):1147–1158. pmid:11157926
- 41. Masse E, Gottesman S. A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. PNAS. 2002;99(7):4620–4625. pmid:11917098
- 42. Wassarman KM, Zhang A, Storz G. Small RNAs in Escherichia coli. Trends in Microbiology. 1999;7(1):37–45. pmid:10068996
- 43. Moller T, Franch T, Hojrup P, Keene DR, Bachinger HP, Brennan RG, et al. Hfq: a bacterial Sm-like protein that mediates RNA-RNA interaction. Molecular Cell. 2002;9(1):23–30. pmid:11804583
- 44. Liu MY, Romeo T. The global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli is a specific mRNA-binding protein. Journal of Bacteriology. 1997;179(14):4639–4642. pmid:9226279
- 45. Weilbacher T, Suzuki K, Dubey AK, Wang X, Gudapaty S, Morozov I, et al. A novel sRNA component of the carbon storage regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Molecular Microbiology. 2003;48(3):657–670. pmid:12694612
- 46. Aarons S, Abbas A, Adams C, Fenton A, O'Gara F. A regulatory RNA (PrrB RNA) modulates expression of secondary metabolite genes in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113. Journal of Bacteriology. 2000;182(14):3913–3919. pmid:10869066
- 47. Heeb S, Blumer C, Haas D. Regulatory RNA as mediator in GacA/RsmA-dependent global control of exoproduct formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184(4):1046–1056. pmid:11807065
- 48. Babitzke P, Romeo T. CsrB sRNA family: sequestration of RNA-binding regulatory proteins. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2007;10(2):156–163. pmid:17383221