Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Correction: Can quartet analyses combining maximum likelihood estimation and Hennigian logic overcome long branch attraction in phylogenomic sequence data?

  • The PLOS ONE Staff

There are multiple errors in Fig 1. The authors have provided a corrected version here. The publisher apologizes for the error.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flowchart of the PhyQuart algorithm.

Simplified flowchart showing a) each of the three possible quartet relationships for a set of 4 sequences (q1, q2, q3), b) the site-pattern classification of observed (Nobs) symmetric () and asymmetric () support (), c) the determination of plesiomorphic (old) split-supporting site-patterns given two different polarities of character transformation along the internal branch of each possible quartet tree, and , and d) estimation of expected convergent split-supporting site-patterns (,) supporting quartet q1 in ML split pattern estimations using branch length and model optimization on constraint topologies of the other two possible quartet relationships (q2, q3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186617.g001

Reference

  1. 1. Kück P, Wilkinson M, Groß C, Foster PG, Wägele JW (2017) Can quartet analyses combining maximum likelihood estimation and Hennigian logic overcome long branch attraction in phylogenomic sequence data? PLoS ONE 12(8): e0183393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183393 pmid:28841676