Sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration during antiretroviral treatment initiation among children living with HIV: Implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

Bindu Parachalil Gopalan; Kayur Mehta; Reena R. D'souza; Niharika Rajnala; Hemanth Kumar A. K.; Geetha Ramachandran; Anita Shet

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183080

Abstract

Nevirapine, a component of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, known for auto-induction of metabolism, is initiated at half therapeutic dose until day 14 (‘lead-in period’), and subsequently escalated to full dose. However, studies have shown that this dosing strategy based on adult studies may not be appropriate in children, given that younger children have higher drug clearance rates. In this prospective cohort study, we studied trough plasma nevirapine levels by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at days 7, 14 (lead-in period) and 28 (full dose period) after ART initiation amongst HIV-1 infected children initiating nevirapine-based ART in southern India. Among the 20 children (50% male, median age 9 years) included in the study, sub-therapeutic trough plasma nevirapine concentration (<4μg/ml) was seen in 65% (13/20) of children during the lead-in period within two weeks of ART initiation and among 10% of children at 4 weeks during full-dose nevirapine. Adherence was documented as ≥95% in all children by both caregiver self-report and pill count. Median nevirapine concentrations achieved at week 1 was 4.8 μg/ml, significantly lower than 8 μg/ml, the concentration achieved at week 4 (p = 0.034). Virological failure at one year of ART was observed in six children, and was not associated with median nevirapine concentration achieved during week 1, 2 or 4. We conclude that the dose escalation strategy currently practiced among young children living with HIV-1 resulted in significant subtherapeutic nevirapine concentration (≤4μg/ml) during the lead-in period. We call for a closer look at pediatric-focused dosing strategies for nevirapine initiation in young children. Further studies to establish age-appropriate threshold nevirapine concentration are warranted in young children to corroborate the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in predicting virological outcome.

Citation: Gopalan BP, Mehta K, D'souza RR, Rajnala N, A. K. HK, Ramachandran G, et al. (2017) Sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration during antiretroviral treatment initiation among children living with HIV: Implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. PLoS ONE 12(8): e0183080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183080

Editor: Charlotte Charpentier, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, FRANCE

Received: March 16, 2017; Accepted: July 29, 2017; Published: August 21, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Gopalan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The study was supported by the Wellcome Trust/ Department of Biotechnology India Alliance Senior Fellowship awarded to AS, Grant number: IA/S/13/2/501017 (http://www.wellcomedbt.org/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Nevirapine was the first non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) approved by the FDA for pediatric use since 1998. Although nevirapine has a low genetic barrier to resistance, its triple advantages of virologic efficiency, safety and reasonable cost made it the most preferred NNRTI for paediatric use in resource limited settings [1]. The availability of fixed dose drug combination (FDC) tablets of zidovudine, lamivudine and nevirapine further simplified and cemented first-line treatment of pediatric HIV.

Notwithstanding its many advantages, nevirapine had pharmacokinetic aspects that merited a closer look, and set it apart from other antiretroviral drugs. Nevirapine is metabolized by the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 enzyme complex including CYP3A4/5 and CYP2B6, functioning both as a substrate and an inducer of cytochrome P450. Auto-induction of nevirapine metabolism generally sets in only by the second to fourth week of treatment initiation, resulting in a 1.5 to 2-fold increase in oral clearance. This delayed auto induction can give rise to potentially higher than expected plasma concentrations of nevirapine within the first two weeks [2]. To overcome the problem of higher concentration of nevirapine in blood and a subsequent greater probability of drug toxicities, a dose escalation strategy was used, where nevirapine was initiated at a half-therapeutic single daily dose during the first two weeks when metabolism is slower than usual, (the ‘lead-in period’), and after 14 days of therapy, the dose was escalated to the age-appropriate full therapeutic dose administered twice daily [3]. While this strategy appeared to solve the theoretical problem of high plasma drug concentration in the first two weeks of nevirapine initiation, the possibility of sub-therapeutic concentration due to higher nevirapine metabolism in young children was not taken into account [4]. Sub-therapeutic drug concentration during early therapy can result in slower viral clearance, increased risk of development of drug resistance and virological failure. Further, studies indicate that nevirapine metabolism in young children aged ≤8 years was more rapid than that observed in children >8 years, and that younger children required higher doses of nevirapine to achieve therapeutic concentration [5–7].

Studies conducted among adult cohorts indicated the risk of greater drug toxicity when this dose escalation strategy was not used, although a consistent relationship between toxicity and nevirapine pharmacokinetic parameters has not been observed [8,9]. A randomized controlled trial in Zambia comparing full-dose nevirapine versus a dose escalation strategy among children, did not reveal higher degree of toxicity among those children who received full dose nevirapine at initiation [10]. Thus, virological failure due to underexposure and possibly lower than optimal dosing is of greater concern than toxicity due to overdosing in young children [11,12].

Maintaining optimal plasma concentration of nevirapine is critical, because a single point mutation at specific position on the pol gene on the HIV-1 genome may confer high-level resistance to nevirapine [13,14]. Studies have indicated that trough plasma nevirapine concentration (C_trough) of </ = 3μg/ml is associated with increased risk of treatment failure by promoting the evolution of drug resistant viral variants [15]. Data largely from adult studies were conflicting, suggesting a range of target nevirapine concentrations from 3 to 4.3 μg/ml [16–19]. Additionally, there is no consensus regarding the target drug concentration to be achieved for successful virological control.

Very few studies have explored the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in children, particularly in the early period of ART initiation. We undertook this study aiming to describe nevirapine pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected young Indian children who were initiated on nevirapine containing ART that used a dose escalation strategy for nevirapine. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration during dose escalation and steady state on early immunological and virological outcomes.

Materials and methods

Patient population and study design

This longitudinal cohort study was conducted from January 2013 to February 2015 at the Infectious Disease clinic at St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore. Following approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board, written informed consent was obtained from parents or caregivers, and assent was obtained from children older than 7 years of age who were eligible and willing to participate in the study. Eligible children were HIV-1 positive, aged between 2–18 years and initiating nevirapine-containing ART regimen. Children with serious life-threatening illnesses, a reported history of maternal antenatal NNRTI exposure, or those with elevated liver enzymes at baseline were excluded from the study.

At enrolment, baseline history, anthropometry and physical examination were documented. Routine laboratory tests performed at baseline included complete blood count, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and CD4+ T cell count. Blood samples were obtained for the evaluation of HIV-1 RNA load and drug resistance profile at baseline (week 0) prior to ART initiation. Nevirapine was initiated at half-therapeutic dose (120–150 mg/m² body surface area (BSA)/dose once a day up to a maximum dose of 200 mg once a day) along with full-dose zidovudine and lamivudine based on WHO weight band dosing criteria as recommended by the National AIDS Control Organization Paediatric ART guidelines [20]. A fixed dose combination (FDC) of zidovudine, lamivudine and nevirapine was administered in the morning followed by FDC of zidovudine and lamivudine in the evening. At the end of week 2 (Day 15), after the lead-in dosing period, the dose of nevirapine was escalated to full dose (120–150 mg/m² BSA/dose twice daily up to a maximum dose of 200 mg twice daily) without a change in the other two medications (FDC of zidovudine, lamivudine and nevirapine twice daily). Children were followed closely for one year, with scheduled study visits at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48. At each study visit adherence to therapy was carefully reviewed, by pill count and self-report by the child or caregiver. Pill count was conducted by trained staff during the clinic visit, and adherence computed by dividing the number of pills presumably consumed during the period between visits, by the number of pills dispensed for that time period multiplied by 100 [21]. Average adherence (based on the average of pill count and self-report) was categorized as >95% adherence, 75 to 95% adherence and <75% adherence [12].

Laboratory analysis

Six ml of whole blood was collected in an EDTA vacutainer tube during each study visit before ART administration for measuring trough plasma nevirapine level, HIV-1 viral load and drug resistance genotyping. Plasma was separated out by centrifuging the whole blood at 1500 x g for 15 minutes at 4°C, aliquoted in 1 ml screw capped vials and stored at -80°C until analysis.

CD4 cell counts were obtained by flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson, CA, USA) at baseline, week 24 and week 48. HIV-1 RNA viral loads were evaluated in the stored plasma samples using Abbott Real Time HIV-1 assay (Abbott Molecular Inc., Des Plaines, IL, USA) at all study visits. Trough plasma nevirapine concentration were estimated at the end of week 1 and week 2 (lead-in period) and week 4 (steady-state period) of ART initiation.

Nevirapine pharmacokinetic testing was performed at National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India by a validated HPLC method (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with UV detection using 3-Isobutyl-1-methyl xanthine as internal standard for the assay [22]. Nevirapine concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 10 μg/ ml were used for the preparation of standard curve which was found to be linear. The lowest detection limit of the assay was 0.25 μg/ml. Repeatability studies were performed for quality control; 10% of samples were re-analysed in a blinded manner, and the percentage variation was below 10%. A plasma nevirapine level of 4 μg/ml was chosen as the target trough plasma nevirapine level to be achieved for long term virological control for the purpose of this study in line with two other studies that compared nevirapine concentration and virological outcome (3.9 μg/ml [18], 4.3 μg/ml [19]). Therapeutic response was assessed by immunological and virological outcome at week 48 of therapy. Immunological failure was defined as persistent CD4 count below 200 cells/mm³ or CD4 percentage <10%. Virological failure at one year of ART was defined as the detection of HIV-1 RNA viral load ≥200 copies/ml [23].

Genotypic HIV Drug resistance (HIVDR) testing was performed retrospectively by population sequencing (Sanger method) in stored plasma samples at baseline and at week 48 if viral loads were ≥1000 copies/ml. One ml plasma was centrifuged at 20000 x g for 1 hour at 4°C to concentrate the virus and RNA was extracted using Qiagen QIAmp viral RNA mini kit following manufacturer’s protocol (QIAamp viral RNA extraction kit, Germany). First strand cDNA synthesis was performed using revert aid reverse transcriptase enzyme (Thermo scientific, MA, USA) and random hexamers (Promega). Nested PCR for HIV-1 pol which comprises of Reverse Transcriptase amino acid 17 to 235 (HxB2 position 2598 to 3250) region where majority of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) tend to get accumulated was performed as described previously [24]. The products (size 652 bp) were gel purified using QIAquick Gel extraction kit and sequenced in an ABI PRISM® 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Drug resistance mutations were analysed by Stanford University Genotypic Resistance Interpretation Algorithm (HIVdb version 8.2) [25]. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed (MEGA 6.0) from the generated sequences along with sub type specific reference sequences downloaded from Los Alamos HIV data base (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/.) for determining HIV-1 subtypes. Viral RNA sequences analysed in this study have been submitted to GenBank with accession numbers MF359600 to MF359625.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24.0 statistical package. Categorical variables describing patient characteristics were described as frequencies (%) and median (with interquartile ranges at 25^th and 75^th, IQR). Difference between trough plasma nevirapine concentration during the lead-in period of weeks 1 and 2, and steady state period (week 4) were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to test the association between outcome variables (weekly nevirapine levels and viral load). Mann-Whitney U test was used when two groups were compared (plasma nevirapine concentration between groups of virological failures and viremia controllers). For all tests, p <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Results

A total of 31 children who initiated nevirapine-containing ART regimen were screened at the study site during 2013. Of them, 28 consented for participation in this study. During the observation period, six children experienced ART interruption and had to drop out of the study (four developed nevirapine-induced toxicity and two developed adverse events related to zidovudine and cotrimoxazole). Further, two children were transferred to another centre, resulting in a final cohort of 20 children (median age 9 years; males 50%) with complete data for 48 weeks. None of these children experienced ART or cotrimoxazole prophylaxis related adverse events. Demography and laboratory parameters of the included children are presented in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Characteristics of children included in the study (n = 20).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183080.t001

All children reported >95% adherence to therapy at each clinic visit throughout the study period. Phylogenetic analysis of the pol sequence derived from plasma virus at baseline revealed that all children were infected with HIV-1 subtype C. At week 48, virological failure was observed in 30% (6/20) of children. Immunological failure was not observed as the median CD4 percentage rose from 17 (IQR 12.5, 23.5) at baseline to 31 (IQR 26.7, 36.5) at week 48. Median CD4% of those in virological failure was 30% (IQR 25, 35).

During the lead-in period, sub-therapeutic trough plasma nevirapine concentration (≤4μg/ml) was seen in 65% (13/20) of children initiating ART. This included 40% (8/20) at week 1, and 55% (11/20) at week 2 of ART initiation. After dose escalation, sub-therapeutic concentration was seen in 10% (2/20) of children at week 4. Median trough plasma nevirapine concentration during the lead-in period was 4.8 μg/ml (IQR 3.5, 6.1) at week 1 and 3.4 μg/ml (IQR 2.1, 7.9) at week 2. The steady state median trough nevirapine concentration measured at week 4 was 8 μg/ml (IQR 5.6, 10.7). Median nevirapine concentration achieved at week 1 was significantly lower than the concentration achieved at week 4 (Wilcoxon signed rank; p = 0.034,) although statistically significant difference was not observed between week 2 and week 4 (p = 0.132). (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Comparison of trough plasma nevirapine concentration (μg/ml) during lead-in and steady state period.

The difference between lead in (week1, 2) and steady state (week4) trough plasma nevirapine concentration (p = 0.034, p = 0.132) were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183080.g001

There were six children who were in virological failure at week 48. No significant correlation was observed between plasma nevirapine concentration at week 1, 2 or 4 and viral load achieved at week 48 (Spearman’s rho; p ≥0.05). During the lead-in period, 66.6% (4/6) of virological failures and 64.2% (9/14) of viremia controllers had subtherapeutic nevirapine concentration. Median nevirapine concentration observed among the two groups were 4.8 μg/ml (IQR 3.4, 8.8) vs. 4.8 μg/ml (IQR 3.5, 6.1) at week 1, 7.1 μg/ml (IQR 1.9, 11.5) vs. 3.1 μg/ml; (IQR 2.1, 7.7) at week 2, 6.1 μg/ml(IQR 4.1, 8.5) vs. 8.4 μg/ml (IQR 5.5, 11.5) at week 4. Although there was no significant difference in the median nevirapine concentration achieved at week 1, 2 or 4 between virological failures and viremia controllers (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.967, p = 0.433, p = 0.187 respectively) baseline CD4% differed significantly between the two groups (p = 0.047) (Table 2).

Download:

Table 2. Variables of observed among virological failures and viremia controllers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183080.t002

Among those children who experienced virological failure, one child had nevirapine associated resistance mutations K101E and E138G observed at baseline and at virological failure. Newly acquired drug resistance mutations were observed in 4 children at virological failure, and among them 3 had subtherapeutic nevirapine levels during the lead-in period. The mutations associated with nevirapine resistance observed were K103N (n = 2), G190A (n = 2), Y181C (n = 1), V108I (n = 1), K101E (n = 1), and E138G (n = 1). NRTI resistance mutations M184V and V75I were also observed. Baseline drug resistance was not observed among the viremia controllers.

Table 3 displays the median trough plasma nevirapine concentration and therapeutic response as a function of age. Subtherapeutic nevirapine concentration were seen in 87.5% (7/8) of children ≤8 years, and in 50% (6/12) among children >8 years. Lead-in (week1) and steady state nevirapine concentration was significantly different between the age groups (p = 0.023, p = 0.011). The proportion of children experiencing virological failure was higher in the ≤8 years age group (50%) in comparison to the >8 years age group (16.6%) although there was no statistical significance (Mann Whitney U p = 0.16).

Download:

Table 3. Nevirapine pharmacokinetics and therapeutic response based on age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183080.t003

Discussion

In this study, we found that ART initiation in young children using the dose escalation strategy for nevirapine resulted in significant sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration during the lead-in period compared to the steady state period. Sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration were more pronounced in children ≤8 years of age; supporting earlier observations that younger children metabolized nevirapine more rapidly than older children [4,5,7].

Previous studies on pharmacokinetics in adults have indicated slow induction of nevirapine metabolism with initial doses, while later doses were associated with faster metabolism [26]. The strategy of dose-escalation for nevirapine was largely derived from studies conducted in adult cohorts [27,28]. However, the relevance of extrapolating adult data to the pediatric population has been a matter of considerable debate. Previous studies on nevirapine pharmacokinetics in children demonstrated that nevirapine clearance increased with decreasing age, and children younger than 8 years have higher oral clearance when compared to older children, suggesting the requirement of higher doses to achieve equivalent drug exposure in these young children [5]. However, nevirapine pharmacokinetic data combined from eight pediatric clinical trials representing a total of 639 subjects from multiple continents and across the pediatric age continuum demonstrated that the age effect on clearence was modest and found that clearence increased with age in the first year of life [29]. Sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration during the lead-in period have been reported from various adult studies as well [30,31]. The CHAPAS-1 trial that included 79 children (>2yrs) on nevirapine dose escalation reported sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentration in 12% children, and found no association between virological failure and plasma drug concentration at week 2 [1]. Subtherapeutic nevirapine concentration attributable to rapid drug metabolism in children <8 years has also been reported by Ellis et al [4]. In keeping with existing literature, our findings suggest that dose escalation strategy resulted in suboptimal drug concentration and may not be appropriate for young Indian children, especially for those younger than 8 years of age.

The minimum threshold drug concentration required for therapeutic drug monitoring varies widely across various studies ranging from 3 to 4.3 μg/ml. Veldkamp et al suggested a target concentration of 3.4 μg/ml from 12 week onwards for controlling viral loads to <50 copies/ml in adults on dose escalation [17]. Wang et al recommended a target concentration of 3.9 μg/ml for therapeutic drug monitoring in Chinese adult population [18]. Requena et al suggested a concentration of >4.3 μg/ml for the complete suppression of all polymorphic natural variants [19]. Studies conducted in children by Fillekes et al (CHAPAS trial), Ellis et al, Zoufaly et al, Nikanjam et al, Corbet et al and Vanprapar et al had chosen nevirapine concentration of <3 μg/ml as subtherapeutic [1,4,12,29,32,33] while Ramachandran et al, Chokephaibulkit et al and Mukherjee et al, had chosen a minimum trough level of 3.4 μg/ml [34–36]. These threshold nevirapine concentrations were established largely from adult studies and did not explore drug pharmacokinetics during dose escalation, and thus may not be applicable for young children, especially in the setting of higher apparent oral clearance as described earlier. We used a cut off value of 4 μg/ml, and still found a substantial proportion of children with sub-therapeutic drug concentration during the lead-in period. Although the steady state nevirapine concentration achieved was in therapeutic range in a majority of children, the extremely low levels observed during week 1 and 2 may predispose to the selection of resistance and virological failure.

A number of studies have reported an association between subtherapeutic plasma nevirapine concentration and poor virological outcome [12,15,17,19]. However, few other studies have found lack of association ([1,34,37,38] thereby questioning the role of therapeutic drug monitoring to predict virological outcome. Requena et al found a therapeutic trough nevirapine concentration window to predict longer virological suppression [19], while Kimulwo et al [39] associated the increase in early peak nevirapine concentration at 4 hours of ART to lower viral loads. Thus, so far there is no consensus opinion on what might be the ideal target drug levels, time point for evaluating drug concentration, and peak/trough levels to be evaluated in predicting virological outcome.

In this study, we failed to observe a clinically relevant effect of nevirapine concentration on virological outcome. This finding could have been affected by various factors, mainly the small sample size and possible role of primary or acquired drug resistance among minor viral variants. Recruitment was halted after we noted high level of nevirapine-based adverse reactions in several of the enrolled children. The national policy change in the choice of first-line NNRTI treatment regimen from nevirapine to efavirenz/atazanavir during the course of the study precluded further recruitment for the study. Additionally, virological failure in a therapy adherent patient can be attributable to drug resistant minor viral variants that were pre-existing or evolved during the course of therapy [40]. In an ART regimen containing a low genetic barrier drug like nevirapine, viral variants carrying single point mutations (K103N or Y181C) evolve rapidly irrespective of plasma concentration of the drug.

The larger interpretation of this study needs to consider some potential limitations. The major limitations of this study are the small sample size and the lack of information about the pharmacogenetic determinants of plasma nevirapine concentration. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), in the gene encoding drug metabolizing liver enzyme cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) has well known impact on plasma nevirapine levels [41,42]. SNPs at exon 4 (516 G > T) and exon 7 (983 T > C) of CYP2B6 are known to reduce the catalytic activity of enzyme resulting in higher trough plasma drug levels [41,43] suggesting that lead in dosing could be more appropriate for a 516TT or 983CC genotype individual. In view of the finding by Varshney et al that approximately 20% of the Indian population are poor drug metabolizers [44], there is an increased likelihood of a rapid metabolizer genotype 516 GG or GT in our cohort which might have confounded our results. Nevertheless, this is the first longitudinal study in India that assessed nevirapine concentration in children during the dose escalation period at ART initiation, thus contributing important information on nevirapine pharmacokinetics in children.

Although nevirapine-based ART is not the preferred first-line ART regimen currently, it still remains an effective alternative first-line ART regimen for children, adolescents and adults [45]. As the principally recommended stand-alone formulations and fixed drug combinations of dolutegravir and efavirenz are not widely available and affordable especially in low and middle income settings, the WHO recommends the use of nevirapine-based regimen as alternate first-line regimen in these settings [45]. Nevirapine also remains the NNRTI of choice for newborns initiating treatment at birth, and an alternative option when clinically required by patients who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to other NNRTIs. Thus, our finding of sub-therapeutic concentration during lead-in period and subsequent resistance acquired early in the course of nevirapine therapy, although not statistically significant, holds relevance and can impact the future available therapeutic options in children and adolescents living with HIV.

We conclude that the dose escalation strategy practised in HIV-1 infected young children initiated on nevirapine-containing ART in India resulted in a significant proportion of children with sub-therapeutic nevirapine concentrations during the lead-in period. This study finding has important clinical implications considering the continued use of nevirapine as an alternate option in the first-line ART regimen in children. Our findings underscore the need for a thorough review of the nevirapine dose escalation strategy in children. Further studies conducted in larger cohorts are warranted for establishing age-appropriate threshold nevirapine concentration in young children and to corroborate the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in predicting virological outcome.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Weekly nevirapine levels, viral loads and drug resistance mutations detected in the cohort.

NA: Not applicable, NVP: nevirapine, DRMs; Drug resistance mutations. C_trough NVP Conc.: Trough plasma nevirapine concentration.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183080.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the children who took part in this study and their caregivers. We thank the study nurse Ms. Bincy Antony, biostatistician Ms. Kartika Kumar and all the supporting staff.

References

1. Fillekes Q, Mulenga V, Kabamba D, Kankasa C, Thomason MJ, Cook A, et al. Is nevirapine dose-escalation appropriate in young, African, HIV-infected children? AIDS. 2013;27: 2111–2115. pmid:23595153
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Cammett AM, MacGregor TR, Wruck JM, Felizarta F, Miailhes P, Mallolas J, et al. Pharmacokinetic assessment of nevirapine and metabolites in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients with hepatic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53: 4147–4152. pmid:19620337
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection in infants and children in resource-limited settings: towards universal access. 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/WHOpaediatric.pdf. Accessed 15th June 2017
4. Ellis JC, L’homme RF, Ewings FM, Mulenga V, Bell F, Chileshe R, et al. Nevirapine concentrations in HIV-infected children treated with divided fixed-dose combination antiretroviral tablets in Malawi and Zambia. Antivir Ther. 2007;12: 253–260. pmid:17503667
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Luzuriaga K, Bryson Y, McSherry G, Robinson J, Stechenberg B, Scott G, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and activity of nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children. J Infect Dis. 1996;174: 713–721. pmid:8843207
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Mirochnick M, Clarke DF, Dorenbaum A. Nevirapine: pharmacokinetic considerations in children and pregnant women. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39: 281–293. pmid:11069214
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Swaminathan S, Ramachandran G, Kupparam HKA, Mahalingam V, Soundararajan L, Kannabiran BP, et al. Factors influencing plasma nevirapine levels: A study in HIV-infected children on generic antiretroviral treatment in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66: 1354–1359. pmid:21393201
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Havlir D, Cheeseman SH, McLaughlin M, Murphy R, Erice A, Spector SA, et al. High-dose nevirapine: safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral effect in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1995;171: 537–545. pmid:7533197
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Stern JO, Robinson PA, Love J, Lanes S, Imperiale MS, Mayers DL. A comprehensive hepatic safety analysis of nevirapine in different populations of HIV infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34 Suppl 1: S21–33. pmid:14562855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Mulenga V, Cook A, Walker AS, Kabamba D, Chijoka C, Ferrier A, et al. Strategies for Nevirapine Initiation in HIV‐Infected Children Taking Pediatric Fixed‐Dose Combination “Baby Pills” in Zambia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51: 1081–1089. pmid:20868279
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Menson EN, Walker AS, Sharland M, Wells C, Tudor-Williams G, Riordan FAI, et al. Underdosing of antiretrovirals in UK and Irish children with HIV as an example of problems in prescribing medicines to children, 1997–2005: cohort study. BMJ. 2006;332: 1183–7. pmid:16709991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Zoufaly A, Fillekes Q, Hammerl R, Nassimi N, Jochum J, Awasom CN, et al. Prevalence and determinants of virological failure in HIV-infected children on antiretroviral therapy in rural Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. Antivir Ther. 2013;690: 681–690. PMID: 23502762
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Chaix ML, Ekouevi DK, Peytavin G, Rouet F, Tonwe-Gold B, Viho I, et al. Impact of nevirapine (NVP) plasma concentration on selection of resistant virus in mothers who received single-dose NVP to prevent perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission and persistence of resistant virus in their infected children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51: 896–901. pmid:17178792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Wang Y, Xing H, Liao L, Wang Z, Su B, Zhao Q, et al. The development of drug resistance mutations K103N Y181C and G190A in long term Nevirapine-containing antiviral therapy. AIDS Res Ther. 2014;11: 36. pmid:25926857
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. de Vries-Sluijs TE, Dieleman JP, Arts D, Huitema AD, Beijnen JH, Schutten M, et al. Low nevirapine plasma concentrations predict virological failure in an unselected HIV-1-infected population. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42: 599–605. pmid:12793844
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Kappelhoff BS, Crommentuyn KM, De Maat MM, Mulder JW, Huitema AD, Beijnen JH. Practical guidelines to interpret plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43: 845–853. pmid:15509183
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Veldkamp a I, Weverling GJ, Lange JM, Montaner JS, Reiss P, Cooper D a, et al. High exposure to nevirapine in plasma is associated with an improved virological response in HIV-1-infected individuals. AIDS. 2001;15: 1089–1095. pmid:11416710
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Wang J, Kou H, Fu Q, Han Y, Qiu Z, Zuo L, et al. Nevirapine plasma concentrations are associated with virologic response and hepatotoxicity in Chinese patients with HIV infection. PLoS One. 2011;6: 0–7. pmid:22066007
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. de Requena DG, Bonora S, Garazzino S, Sciandra M, D’Avolio A, Raiteri R, et al. Nevirapine plasma exposure affects both durability of viral suppression and selection of nevirapine primary resistance mutations in a clinical setting. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49: 3966–3969. pmid:16127084
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. NACO Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy Guidelines. 2013. doi:Accessed 7 March 2017. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/Pediatric_14-03-2014.pdf
21. Farley JJ, Montepiedra G, Storm D, Sirois PA, Malee K, Garvie P, et al. Assessment of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in perinatally HIV-infected children and youth using self-report measures and pill count. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29: 377–384. pmid:18714204
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Ramachandran G, Hemanthkumar AK, Kumaraswami V, Swaminathan S. A simple and rapid liquid chromatography method for simultaneous determination of zidovudine and nevirapine in plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;843: 339–344. pmid:16815761
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. University of California San Francisco Center for HIV Information. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents/ Adverse Effects of Antiretroviral Agents. 2015; 1–6. Available from: https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/education-materials/fact-sheets/22/68/hiv-and-lactic-acidosis. Accessed 15th June 2017.
24. Neogi U, Sahoo PN, De Costa A, Shet A. High viremia and low level of transmitted drug resistance in anti-retroviral therapy-naïve perinatally-infected children and adolescents with HIV-1 subtype C infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12: 317. pmid:23171203
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web Resources for HIV Type 1 Genotypic-Resistance Test Interpretation. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42: 1608–1618. pmid:16652319
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Cheeseman SH, Mclaughlin MM, Koup RA, Andrews CA. Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine: initial single- rising-dose study in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37: 178–182. pmid:8452345
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. de Maat MM, Huitema AD, Mulder JW, Meenhorst PL, van Gorp EC, Beijnen JH. Population pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in an unselected cohort of HIV-1-infected individuals. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54: 378–385. pmid:12392585
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Barreiro P, Soriano V, Casas E, Estrada V, Tellez MJ, Hoetelmans R, et al. Prevention of nevirapine-associated exanthema using slow dose escalation and/or corticosteroids. AIDS. 2000;14: 2153–2157. pmid:11061657
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Nikanjam M, Kabamba D, Cressey TR, Burger D, Aweek FT, Acosta EP, et al. Nevirapine exposure with WHO pediatric weight band dosing: Enhanced therapeutic concentrations predicted based on extensive international pharmacokinetic experience. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56: 5374–5380. pmid:22869579
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Van Oosterhout JJ, Kumwenda JJ, Beadsworth M, Mateyu G, Longwe T, Burger DM, et al. Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy started early in the course of tuberculosis treatment in adult Malawians. Antivir Ther. 2007;12: 515–521. pmid:17668560
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Avihingsanon A, Manosuthi W, Kantipong P, Chuchotaworn C, Moolphate S, Sakornjun W, et al. Pharmacokinetics and 48-week efficacy of nevirapine: 400 mg versus 600 mg per day in HIV-tuberculosis coinfection receiving rifampicin. Antivir Ther. 2008;13: 529–536. pmid:18672531
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Corbett AH, Hosseinipour MC, Nyirenda J, Kanyama C, Rezk NL, Mkupani P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of generic and trade formulations of lamivudine, stavudine and nevirapine in HIV-infected Malawian children. Antivir Ther. 2010;15: 83–90. pmid:20167994
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Vanprapar N, Cressey TR, Chokephaibulkit K, Muresan P, Plipat N, Sirisanthana V, et al. A chewable pediatric fixed-dose combination tablet of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine: pharmacokinetics and safety compared with the individual liquid formulations in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children in Thailand. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29: 940–944. pmid:20453709
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Ramachandran G, Kumar AKH, Ponnuraja C, Ramesh K, Rajesh L. Lack of association between plasma levels of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors & virological outcomes during rifampicin co-administration in HIV-infected TB patients. Indian J Med Res. 2013; 955–961. pmid:24521642
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Chokephaibulkit K, Cressey TR, Capparelli E, Sirisanthana V, Muresan P, Hongsiriwon S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of a new paediatric fixed-dose combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine in HIV-infected children. Antivir Ther. 2011;16: 1287–1295. pmid:22155910
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Mukherjee A, Singla M, Velpandian T, Sirohiwal A, Vajpayee M, Singh R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine, stavudine and lamivudine in Indian HIV-infected children receiving generic fixed dose combinations. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51: 191–197. pmid:24736906
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Manosuthi W, Tantanathip P, Chimsuntorn S, Eampokarap B, Thongyen S, Nilkamhang S, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis who received a nevirapine-based antiretroviral regimen: A four-year prospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14: 0–4. pmid:20880733
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Poerksen G, Pollock L, Moons P, Chesshyre E, Burger D, Khoo S, et al. Steady-state nevirapine, lamivudine and stavudine levels in Malawian HIV-infected children on antiretroviral therapy using split Triomune 30 tablets. Antivir Ther. 2010;15: 343–350. pmid:20516554
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Kimulwo MJ, Okendo J, Aman RA, Ogutu BR, Kokwaro GO, Ochieng DJ, et al. Plasma nevirapine concentrations predict virological and adherence failure in Kenyan HIV-1 infected patients with extensive antiretroviral treatment exposure. PLoS One. 2017;12: 1–14. pmid:28235021
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Pennings PS. Standing genetic variation and the evolution of drug resistance in HIV. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(6):e1002527. pmid:22685388
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Calcagno A, D’Avolio A, Simiele M, Cusato J, Rostagno R, Libanore V, et al. Influence of CYP2B6 and ABCB1 SNPs on nevirapine plasma concentrations in Burundese HIV-positive patients using dried sample spot devices. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74: 134–140. pmid:22680342
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Ramachandran G, Ramesh K, Kumar AKH, Jagan I, Vasantha M, Padmapriyadarsini C, et al. Association of high T allele frequency of CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism among ethnic south Indian HIV-infected patients with elevated plasma efavirenz and nevirapine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63: 841–843. pmid:19218571
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Oluka MN, Okalebo FA, Guantai AN, McClelland RS, Graham SM. Cytochrome P450 2B6 genetic variants are associated with plasma nevirapine levels and clinical response in HIV-1 infected Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study. AIDS Res Ther. 2015;12: 10. pmid:25878720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Varshney E, Saha N, Tandon M, Shrivastava V, Ali S. Prevalence of poor and rapid metabolizers of drugs metabolized by CYP2B6 in North Indian population residing in Indian national capital territory. Springerplus. 2012;1: 34. pmid:23961363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach—Second edition. World Health Organization. 2016; 155 p. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/arv-2016/en/. Accessed 15^th June 2017.

[ref1] 1. Fillekes Q, Mulenga V, Kabamba D, Kankasa C, Thomason MJ, Cook A, et al. Is nevirapine dose-escalation appropriate in young, African, HIV-infected children? AIDS. 2013;27: 2111–2115. pmid:23595153
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Cammett AM, MacGregor TR, Wruck JM, Felizarta F, Miailhes P, Mallolas J, et al. Pharmacokinetic assessment of nevirapine and metabolites in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients with hepatic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53: 4147–4152. pmid:19620337
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. World Health Organization (WHO). Antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection in infants and children in resource-limited settings: towards universal access. 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/WHOpaediatric.pdf. Accessed 15th June 2017

[ref4] 4. Ellis JC, L’homme RF, Ewings FM, Mulenga V, Bell F, Chileshe R, et al. Nevirapine concentrations in HIV-infected children treated with divided fixed-dose combination antiretroviral tablets in Malawi and Zambia. Antivir Ther. 2007;12: 253–260. pmid:17503667
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Luzuriaga K, Bryson Y, McSherry G, Robinson J, Stechenberg B, Scott G, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and activity of nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children. J Infect Dis. 1996;174: 713–721. pmid:8843207
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Mirochnick M, Clarke DF, Dorenbaum A. Nevirapine: pharmacokinetic considerations in children and pregnant women. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39: 281–293. pmid:11069214
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Swaminathan S, Ramachandran G, Kupparam HKA, Mahalingam V, Soundararajan L, Kannabiran BP, et al. Factors influencing plasma nevirapine levels: A study in HIV-infected children on generic antiretroviral treatment in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66: 1354–1359. pmid:21393201
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Havlir D, Cheeseman SH, McLaughlin M, Murphy R, Erice A, Spector SA, et al. High-dose nevirapine: safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral effect in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1995;171: 537–545. pmid:7533197
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Stern JO, Robinson PA, Love J, Lanes S, Imperiale MS, Mayers DL. A comprehensive hepatic safety analysis of nevirapine in different populations of HIV infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34 Suppl 1: S21–33. pmid:14562855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Mulenga V, Cook A, Walker AS, Kabamba D, Chijoka C, Ferrier A, et al. Strategies for Nevirapine Initiation in HIV‐Infected Children Taking Pediatric Fixed‐Dose Combination “Baby Pills” in Zambia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51: 1081–1089. pmid:20868279
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Menson EN, Walker AS, Sharland M, Wells C, Tudor-Williams G, Riordan FAI, et al. Underdosing of antiretrovirals in UK and Irish children with HIV as an example of problems in prescribing medicines to children, 1997–2005: cohort study. BMJ. 2006;332: 1183–7. pmid:16709991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Zoufaly A, Fillekes Q, Hammerl R, Nassimi N, Jochum J, Awasom CN, et al. Prevalence and determinants of virological failure in HIV-infected children on antiretroviral therapy in rural Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. Antivir Ther. 2013;690: 681–690. PMID: 23502762
View Article
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Chaix ML, Ekouevi DK, Peytavin G, Rouet F, Tonwe-Gold B, Viho I, et al. Impact of nevirapine (NVP) plasma concentration on selection of resistant virus in mothers who received single-dose NVP to prevent perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission and persistence of resistant virus in their infected children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51: 896–901. pmid:17178792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Wang Y, Xing H, Liao L, Wang Z, Su B, Zhao Q, et al. The development of drug resistance mutations K103N Y181C and G190A in long term Nevirapine-containing antiviral therapy. AIDS Res Ther. 2014;11: 36. pmid:25926857
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. de Vries-Sluijs TE, Dieleman JP, Arts D, Huitema AD, Beijnen JH, Schutten M, et al. Low nevirapine plasma concentrations predict virological failure in an unselected HIV-1-infected population. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42: 599–605. pmid:12793844
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Kappelhoff BS, Crommentuyn KM, De Maat MM, Mulder JW, Huitema AD, Beijnen JH. Practical guidelines to interpret plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43: 845–853. pmid:15509183
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Veldkamp a I, Weverling GJ, Lange JM, Montaner JS, Reiss P, Cooper D a, et al. High exposure to nevirapine in plasma is associated with an improved virological response in HIV-1-infected individuals. AIDS. 2001;15: 1089–1095. pmid:11416710
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Wang J, Kou H, Fu Q, Han Y, Qiu Z, Zuo L, et al. Nevirapine plasma concentrations are associated with virologic response and hepatotoxicity in Chinese patients with HIV infection. PLoS One. 2011;6: 0–7. pmid:22066007
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. de Requena DG, Bonora S, Garazzino S, Sciandra M, D’Avolio A, Raiteri R, et al. Nevirapine plasma exposure affects both durability of viral suppression and selection of nevirapine primary resistance mutations in a clinical setting. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49: 3966–3969. pmid:16127084
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. NACO Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy Guidelines. 2013. doi:Accessed 7 March 2017. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/Pediatric_14-03-2014.pdf

[ref21] 21. Farley JJ, Montepiedra G, Storm D, Sirois PA, Malee K, Garvie P, et al. Assessment of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in perinatally HIV-infected children and youth using self-report measures and pill count. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;29: 377–384. pmid:18714204
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Ramachandran G, Hemanthkumar AK, Kumaraswami V, Swaminathan S. A simple and rapid liquid chromatography method for simultaneous determination of zidovudine and nevirapine in plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;843: 339–344. pmid:16815761
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. University of California San Francisco Center for HIV Information. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents/ Adverse Effects of Antiretroviral Agents. 2015; 1–6. Available from: https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/education-materials/fact-sheets/22/68/hiv-and-lactic-acidosis. Accessed 15th June 2017.

[ref24] 24. Neogi U, Sahoo PN, De Costa A, Shet A. High viremia and low level of transmitted drug resistance in anti-retroviral therapy-naïve perinatally-infected children and adolescents with HIV-1 subtype C infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12: 317. pmid:23171203
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] PubMed/NCBI

[86] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Liu TF, Shafer RW. Web Resources for HIV Type 1 Genotypic-Resistance Test Interpretation. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42: 1608–1618. pmid:16652319
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Cheeseman SH, Mclaughlin MM, Koup RA, Andrews CA. Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine: initial single- rising-dose study in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37: 178–182. pmid:8452345
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. de Maat MM, Huitema AD, Mulder JW, Meenhorst PL, van Gorp EC, Beijnen JH. Population pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in an unselected cohort of HIV-1-infected individuals. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54: 378–385. pmid:12392585
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Barreiro P, Soriano V, Casas E, Estrada V, Tellez MJ, Hoetelmans R, et al. Prevention of nevirapine-associated exanthema using slow dose escalation and/or corticosteroids. AIDS. 2000;14: 2153–2157. pmid:11061657
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Nikanjam M, Kabamba D, Cressey TR, Burger D, Aweek FT, Acosta EP, et al. Nevirapine exposure with WHO pediatric weight band dosing: Enhanced therapeutic concentrations predicted based on extensive international pharmacokinetic experience. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56: 5374–5380. pmid:22869579
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Van Oosterhout JJ, Kumwenda JJ, Beadsworth M, Mateyu G, Longwe T, Burger DM, et al. Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy started early in the course of tuberculosis treatment in adult Malawians. Antivir Ther. 2007;12: 515–521. pmid:17668560
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Avihingsanon A, Manosuthi W, Kantipong P, Chuchotaworn C, Moolphate S, Sakornjun W, et al. Pharmacokinetics and 48-week efficacy of nevirapine: 400 mg versus 600 mg per day in HIV-tuberculosis coinfection receiving rifampicin. Antivir Ther. 2008;13: 529–536. pmid:18672531
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Corbett AH, Hosseinipour MC, Nyirenda J, Kanyama C, Rezk NL, Mkupani P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of generic and trade formulations of lamivudine, stavudine and nevirapine in HIV-infected Malawian children. Antivir Ther. 2010;15: 83–90. pmid:20167994
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Vanprapar N, Cressey TR, Chokephaibulkit K, Muresan P, Plipat N, Sirisanthana V, et al. A chewable pediatric fixed-dose combination tablet of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine: pharmacokinetics and safety compared with the individual liquid formulations in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children in Thailand. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29: 940–944. pmid:20453709
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Ramachandran G, Kumar AKH, Ponnuraja C, Ramesh K, Rajesh L. Lack of association between plasma levels of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors & virological outcomes during rifampicin co-administration in HIV-infected TB patients. Indian J Med Res. 2013; 955–961. pmid:24521642
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Chokephaibulkit K, Cressey TR, Capparelli E, Sirisanthana V, Muresan P, Hongsiriwon S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of a new paediatric fixed-dose combination of zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine in HIV-infected children. Antivir Ther. 2011;16: 1287–1295. pmid:22155910
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Mukherjee A, Singla M, Velpandian T, Sirohiwal A, Vajpayee M, Singh R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of nevirapine, stavudine and lamivudine in Indian HIV-infected children receiving generic fixed dose combinations. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51: 191–197. pmid:24736906
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Manosuthi W, Tantanathip P, Chimsuntorn S, Eampokarap B, Thongyen S, Nilkamhang S, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis who received a nevirapine-based antiretroviral regimen: A four-year prospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14: 0–4. pmid:20880733
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Poerksen G, Pollock L, Moons P, Chesshyre E, Burger D, Khoo S, et al. Steady-state nevirapine, lamivudine and stavudine levels in Malawian HIV-infected children on antiretroviral therapy using split Triomune 30 tablets. Antivir Ther. 2010;15: 343–350. pmid:20516554
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Kimulwo MJ, Okendo J, Aman RA, Ogutu BR, Kokwaro GO, Ochieng DJ, et al. Plasma nevirapine concentrations predict virological and adherence failure in Kenyan HIV-1 infected patients with extensive antiretroviral treatment exposure. PLoS One. 2017;12: 1–14. pmid:28235021
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Pennings PS. Standing genetic variation and the evolution of drug resistance in HIV. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(6):e1002527. pmid:22685388
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Calcagno A, D’Avolio A, Simiele M, Cusato J, Rostagno R, Libanore V, et al. Influence of CYP2B6 and ABCB1 SNPs on nevirapine plasma concentrations in Burundese HIV-positive patients using dried sample spot devices. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74: 134–140. pmid:22680342
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Ramachandran G, Ramesh K, Kumar AKH, Jagan I, Vasantha M, Padmapriyadarsini C, et al. Association of high T allele frequency of CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism among ethnic south Indian HIV-infected patients with elevated plasma efavirenz and nevirapine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63: 841–843. pmid:19218571
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Oluka MN, Okalebo FA, Guantai AN, McClelland RS, Graham SM. Cytochrome P450 2B6 genetic variants are associated with plasma nevirapine levels and clinical response in HIV-1 infected Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study. AIDS Res Ther. 2015;12: 10. pmid:25878720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Varshney E, Saha N, Tandon M, Shrivastava V, Ali S. Prevalence of poor and rapid metabolizers of drugs metabolized by CYP2B6 in North Indian population residing in Indian national capital territory. Springerplus. 2012;1: 34. pmid:23961363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach—Second edition. World Health Organization. 2016; 155 p. Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/arv-2016/en/. Accessed 15^th June 2017.

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Patient population and study design

Laboratory analysis

Statistical analysis

Results and discussion

Results

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Weekly nevirapine levels, viral loads and drug resistance mutations detected in the cohort.

Acknowledgments

References