Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin acetate to guide optimal dosing in cats

Jana Leshinsky; Andrew McLachlan; David J. R. Foster; Ross Norris; Vanessa R. Barrs

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178783

Abstract

Cats are the most common mammal to develop invasive fungal rhinosinusitis caused by cryptic species in Aspergillus section Fumigati that are resistant to azoles but susceptible to caspofungin. In this study nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation was used to investigate caspofungin pharmacokinetics and explore dosing regimens in cats using caspofungin minimum effective concentrations (MECs). Plasma concentrations in healthy cats were determined using HPLC-MS/MS after administration of a single and seven consecutive daily intravenous doses of 1 mg/kg caspofungin. In the final pharmacokinetic model an optimum maximum concentration (C_max): MEC ratio of 10–20 was used to guide caspofungin efficacy. Simulations were performed for dosing regimens (doses 0.25–2 mg/kg and 6–72 h dosing intervals) with and without inclusion of a loading dose. Using a 1 mg/kg dose C_max first dose was 14.8 μg/mL, C_max at steady state was 19.8 μg/mL, C_min was 5 μg/mL and C_max: MEC was >20 in 42.6% of cats after multiple doses. An optimal C_max: MEC ratio was achieved in caspofungin simulations using 0.75 mg/kg q 24 h or 1 mg/kg q 72h. However, at 1 mg/kg q 72h, C_min was < MEC (<1 μg/mL) in over 95% of the population. Using a loading dose of 1 mg/kg and a daily dose of 0.75 mg/kg thereafter, the Cmax: MEC was optimal and C_min was > 2.5 μg/mL for 98% of the population. Based on the modeling data this dosing regimen is likely to achieve target therapeutic concentrations, meet the proposed C_max: MEC window and provide consistent exposure between doses.

Citation: Leshinsky J, McLachlan A, Foster DJR, Norris R, Barrs VR (2017) Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin acetate to guide optimal dosing in cats. PLoS ONE 12(6): e0178783. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783

Editor: Douglas Thamm, Colorado State University, UNITED STATES

Received: March 7, 2017; Accepted: May 18, 2017; Published: June 2, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Leshinsky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was funded by the Australian Companion Animal Health Foundation 009/2015. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Cats are the most common mammal to develop naturally occurring invasive fungal rhinosinusitis caused by cryptic species of Aspergillus in section Fumigati [1]. Sino-orbital aspergillosis occurs in immunocompetent cats, is usually fatal and is most frequently caused by two emerging pathogens in the Aspergillus viridinutans species complex, A. felis and A. udagawae [1]. These cryptic species in section Fumigati also cause invasive fungal infection (IFIs) in humans, usually in the form of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis [1–3].

In both humans and cats A. udagawae and A. felis cause infections with a protracted clinical course that spread across anatomical planes to involve contiguous tissues and are refractory to standard therapy [2, 4]. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of azole and polyene antifungal agents against Aspergillus viridinutans complex species are higher than those for A. fumigatus [3]. Caspofungin is an approved echinocandin for treatment of human patients with invasive aspergillosis refractory to other antifungal therapy [5–12] and was used to cure a case of feline sino-orbital aspergillosis caused by A. felis that failed treatment with azoles and amphotericin B [4]. The pharmacokinetics of caspofungin have been evaluated in rodents, lagomorphs and primates [13, 14]. Among companion animals, the pharmacokinetics of micafungin, but not caspofungin have been determined in dogs and no echinocandins have been evaluated in felines [15].

The pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in cats cannot be extrapolated from other mammals studied thus far since cats have substantial differences in drug metabolism compared to other mammals, including deficiencies in multiple phase II metabolic pathways including N-acetyltransferase (NAT) [16]. Our objective was to determine the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in healthy cats after an intravenous dose of 1 mg/kg and after 7 consecutive daily doses. This study used a modeling and simulation approach to explore caspofungin dosing regimens in cats designed to examine C_max: MEC ratios after intravenous caspofungin infusions.

Materials and methods

Pharmacokinetic study

Animals.

Eight healthy adult desexed domestic shorthair cats (4 females, 4 males) with mean age and body weight of 3.94 ± 1.84 years and 4.4 ± 0.56 kg, respectively were recruited for the study. The cats were healthy cats from a research colony owned by Eurofins SCEC Pty Ltd. (www.scec.net.au) and were returned at the completion of the study in good health. Results of a complete blood count, serum biochemical analyses and urine specific gravity performed 5 days prior to the start of the study were within reference intervals for all cats. Cats were housed individually and acclimatized to the clinical environment for three days prior to the start of the study with free access to food and water. The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) of The University of Sydney (Approval no. 2015/775, 6^th March, 2015).

Drug administration and blood sampling.

For blood sampling, a 20-guage 8 cm triple-lumen central venous catheter (MILACATH^®, MILA International, Inc., Kentucky, USA) was inserted into the jugular vein using a modified Seldinger technique after sedation with IV medetomidine (10 μg/kg; Domitor^®, Pfizer Animal Health Australia, West Ryde, NSW) and butorphanol (0.1 mg/kg; Ilium Butorgesic^®, Troy Laboratories Pty Limited, Glendenning, NSW), 24 h prior to starting the study. For drug administration, a peripheral catheter (22G IV radiopaque catheter; OPTIVA^®, Smiths Medical International Ltd, Lanchashire, UK) was placed into a cephalic vein. For the single dose study (n = 8 cats) caspofungin acetate (Cancidas^®, Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) PTY Limited, South Granville, NSW) was administered by IV infusion (1 mg/kg), 0.2 mg/mL in sterile saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) over 1 h. For the multiple consecutive daily dosing study (n = 6 cats, 3 male, 3 female) administration of caspofungin acetate (1 mg/kg IV infusion over 1 h) was repeated once daily (at the same time each day) for a further 6 days.

Blood (1 mL) was collected in lithium-heparin immediately before drug administration (time 0), and after IV administration at 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged (12, 000 g for 5 min) and plasma was stored at -80°C until assay. For the multi-dose study, a single blood sample was collected before each daily infusion (48, 72, 96 and 120 h after the first dose) to ascertain steady state plasma concentrations and blood sampling was repeated at the same times as day 1 on day 7. Repeat biochemical analyses were performed on Day 8, 24 h after the final caspofungin dose and pharmacokinetic blood sample collection.

Analytical method.

Caspofungin concentrations in cat plasma were determined using HPLC-MS/MS (tandem mass spectrometry). Blood samples were prepared for assay using protein precipitation by adding methanol (80 μL) to 20 μL of calibrators, controls (drug free) and unknown samples using a stable isotope of caspofungin as internal standard (in methanol). Analytical reference standard for caspofungin was supplied by Merck Sharp & Dohme (Whitehouse Station, New Jersey 08889, USA). Chromatography and analysis was performed on a Shimadzu UPLC coupled to an 8050 tandem mass spectrometer in positive ion ESI mode, monitoring the transition 547.6 > 538.5 and internal standard transition 549.5 > 86.2. A Waters BEH C₁₈ column was used with gradient elution with mobile phase A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and mobile Phase B (acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid). The mobile phase gradient involved 100% A for 0.5 minutes and a linear gradient to 0% A by 4.5 minutes. After raising the gradient to 100% B at 4.5 minutes it was held there for 0.5 minutes before returning to initial conditions for a further minute, making a total run time of 6 minutes.

The assay was validated in accordance with the US FDA Guidelines for industry for bioanalytical method validation utilising pooled plasma from six untreated cats with known concentrations of caspofungin reference standard. Linearity was demonstrated over the caspofungin concentration range of 0.1 to 10.0 μg/mL. The assay accuracy and precision (4 replicates on 3 occasions of spiked caspofungin plasma samples at 0.2 and 9.0 μg/mL) showed total precision of 12.0 and 4.3% (expressed as co-efficient of variation), respectively. Accuracy was 103.4 and 96.7%, respectively. Carry-over was demonstrated to be no more than 1.0% of the lowest standard in blank matrix following injection of the highest standard (10.0 μg/mL).

Population pharmacokinetics analysis and dose regimen simulations

Methods software.

Pharmacokinetic model development employed nonlinear mixed-effects modeling using NONMEM version 7.3 [17], with the Wings for NONMEM 7.3interface (http://wfn.sourceforge.net) and IFort compiler. Modeling was performed using a Dell PowerEdge R910 server with 4 by 10 core Xeon 2.26-Ghz processors running Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64- bit software. Data manipulation and post-run processing of NONMEM output was conducted using the R data analysis language (Version 3.2.2) and the packages ggplot2, GGally, foreign, tidyr, Hmisc, gdata, doBy, plyr, grid, stringr with associated dependencies [17–28].

General modeling strategy.

The base pharmacokinetic model was developed in a step-wise manner. Pharmacokinetic models were coded using the built-in ADVAN subroutines of NONMEM. Linear kinetic models with 1 and 2 compartments were evaluated. The First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE) method was used to fit models. The base model was selected on the basis of mechanistic plausibility, visual inspection of goodness-of-fit diagnostic plots, the precision of parameter estimates (se% <30% for fixed, <50% for random effects parameters), and the lowest value of the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC; Eq 1) in accordance with the number of parameters and the final NONMEM derived objective function value (OBJ). The base model was also required to pass the covariance step.

(1)

Unless stated otherwise, population parameter variability (PPV) was represented using an exponential error model (Eq 2): (2) where P_j is the individual value for the parameter in the j^th individual, TVP is the typical population value of P and ηj is an independent random variable with a mean of zero and variance ω². PPV was systematically examined on each fixed-effect parameter. Models with and without covariance for P were investigated using the OMEGA BLOCK functionality of NONMEM.

A combined proportional (θ_prop) and additive (θ_add) residual unexplained error model of the caspofungin concentrations (C) was used, where estimation of a THETA was employed and epsilon was fixed to zero (Eq 3): (3) C_ij is the i^th concentration measured in the j^th individual, is the model predicted C_ij, and θ_prop and θ_add are parameters representing the proportional and additive residual error, respectively. The influence of the additive component of the error was also examined by a comparison with a proportional only error model.

All base models were investigated with allometric scaling for total body weight (TBW) referenced to 4 kg and an exponent fixed of 0.75 for clearance parameters and 1 for volumes, although during base model development models was explored without allometric scaling on any parameter.

Covariate model building.

The base model was screened for the influence of cat sex, guided by plots of individual parameter random effects versus sex if shrinkage was low. Sex was only retained in the model if there was a significant improvement in OBJ at the p <0.01 level.

Model evaluation.

Visual Predictive Checks (VPC) were used to assess the appropriateness of the candidate base and final models, faceted for any included covariates as appropriate. For the VPC’s, the median, 5^th and 95^th percentiles of the prediction-corrected observations were compared against the empirical 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the median, 5^th and 95^th percentiles of caspofungin concentrations from 1000 simulations of the index (original) dataset. The predictive performance of the model was considered acceptable if the median, 5^th and 95^th percentiles of the prediction-corrected observed and simulated data agreed well.

Caspofungin dose regimen simulations.

The final pharmacokinetic model for caspofungin in cats was used to perform dosing simulations designed to examine C_max: minimum effective concentration (MEC) ratios following intravenous infusions of caspofungin. Simulations were performed utilising total drug in serum rather than unbound drug, as published data available for MEC values have only been reported for the total drug. Based on data from a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis an optimum C_max: MEC ratio of 10–20 was chosen as a marker of caspofungin dose efficacy [29]. Simulations were performed for dosing regimens of 0.25 mg/kg at 6 h intervals; 0.5 mg/kg at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h dosing intervals; 0.75 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h intervals; 2 mg/kg at 48 h and 72 h dosing intervals. Loading dose regimen simulations were also considered based upon the results of the constant-dose regimens. A MEC value of 1 μg/mL was chosen based on the epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) of caspofungin for wild type A. fumigatus sens. str [30] and on antifungal susceptibility MEC data from clinical human and feline isolates of A. felis [1] and A. udagawae [2, 31, 32]. The duration of infusion was adjusted to 1, 2 and 4 h in the 1 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg simulations. Concentrations were simulated at 0.1 h intervals for 1000 standard 4 kg cats for each dose regimen for a total of 7 days of dosing. The percentage of animals with a C_max: MEC > 10, > 20 and 10–20 was calculated over the entire 7 days of dosing. Maximising the percentage of animals with a C_max: MEC of 10–20 was the criteria for “goodness” of a regimen. Supplementary pharmacokinetic parameters were also derived from the model parameters: AUC_ss (determined from dose and clearance), distribution (t_1/2α) and terminal (t_1/2β) half-life (calculated from the individual values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for each animal), C_max (derived directly from the data as the concentration at the end of each infusion).

Results

All cats completed the pharmacokinetic study and no changes were seen on complete blood counts and multiple biochemical analyses after consecutive daily dosing. Physical examination parameters were normal throughout the study except for minor transient hyperthermia in one cat (range 39.6–39.8°C, reference range 37.5–39.1°C) during the first caspofungin transfusion only and mild transient diarrhoea that resolved within 24 h of the final caspofungin infusion on Day 8 in another.

Pharmacokinetic modeling

The two-compartment linear model provided the best (ΔOBJ >200) description of the plasma concentration-time profiles of caspofungin in cats compared to a 1-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The two-compartment base model included both proportional and additive residual error terms, and random effects on clearance (CL) and the central volume of distribution (V1). Clearance and V1 were highly correlated. This was best described using a scale factor for the PPV on V1 as a function of the PPV on CL (ΔOBJ > 100) in order to prevent very high shrinkage on V1. Inclusion of PPV on the peripheral volume of distribution (V2) and the inter-compartmental clearance (Q) had no effect on the OBJ (ΔOBJ > 0.1), gave very low estimates for PPV and resulted in failure of the covariance step. Removal of allometric scaling for weight resulted in a worsening of model fit (ΔOBJ > 6), and so was retained in the final model. No covariates demonstrated evidence of predictive performance, and none were included in the final model. The population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of the final pharmacokinetic model for caspofungin in cats are presented in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Population pharmacokinetic parameters for caspofungin in cats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.t001

All model parameters were estimated with very good precision (7–21% RSE). The inter-individual variability for clearance was low (18%) and had minimal shrinkage (< 1%). There was good agreement between the observed and predicted population as well as individually predicted concentrations, with no evidence of bias, consistent with unbiased plots of conditional weighted residuals versus concentration and time after dose.

The visual predictive check based on 1000 simulations of the final PK model suggested acceptable fit of the model to the caspofungin plasma concentration-time data. Fig 1 shows the visual predictive check for simulations based on initial 24 h and final dose on day 7.

Download:

Fig 1. Visual predictive check plot for 1000 simulations of the final pharmacokinetic model and observed data.

Solid lines are the median and dashed lines represent the upper and lower confidence intervals of the observed data (black) and prediction intervals of the final model (red). Circles are the raw observed data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.g001

Caspofungin dose regimen simulations.

Table 2 summarises the caspofungin model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices from the “best” simulations, as well as the regimen employed in the original study (1 mg/kg every q24 h). While increasing the infusion duration from 1 h to 2 h or 4 h had some impact on the observed C_max, this has minimal impact of the different dose regimens in the ability to achieve target exposures. As a result, only the results from 1 h caspofungin infusions are presented here. Data for other dose regimens and infusion durations are presented in supporting material (S1 Table). Similarly, doses above 1mg/kg resulted in excessively high exposures, which were less able to meet the target C_max:MEC ratio, and are not presented here. Data for other dose regimens and infusion durations are presented in supporting material (S1 Table).

Download:

Table 2. Summary of caspofungin model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices from simulations which result in the maximum % animals 10 < C_max/MEC < 20 ratio for three dosing regimens administered as 1 h duration infusions (0.75 mg/kg q 24 h, 1 mg/kg q 24 h and 1 mg/kg q72 h).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.t002

In the typical 4 kg cat, a 1 mg/kg daily caspofungin dose results in a C_max of 14.8 μg/mL on the first dose while this is 19.8 μg/mL at steady-state, with trough concentrations of caspofungin approximately 5 μg/mL. In contrast, when given every 3 days, a 1 mg/kg dose reaches a mean C_max of 15.4 μg/mL and the average trough caspofungin concentrations are less than 1 μg/mL. A 0.75 mg/kg dose daily achieves a mean caspofungin C_max of 11.0 μg/mL after the first dose, 14.7 μg/mL at steady-state, with average trough concentrations of approximately 4 μg/mL.

Plots of the median and 90% CI’s of the predicted caspofungin concentrations over time are provided in Fig 2, while Fig 3 shows the predicted distribution of the C_max:MEC ratio over time. The maximal percentage of animals with a C_max:MEC ratio of 10–20 occurred at 0.75 mg/kg once daily (q24 h) and 1 mg/kg every 3 days (q72 h). At the peak concentration on the first day of dosing with 0.75 mg/kg, 71% of animals were within the optimal C_max: MEC, by the third and later daily doses this reached 97%. With 1 mg/kg dosing, > 96% of animals were within the target ratio after the first dose, and with continued q72 h dosing, this remained relatively constant for the remaining 7 days. Despite almost all animals being above the lower threshold, continued daily dosing with 1 mg/kg (the regimen employed in the original trial), resulted in fewer animals within the target window after subsequent doses, reducing to 76% on the second day, and 57% after the 7^th daily dose due to 43% of animals having a C_max:MEC ratio greater than 20. A loading dose regimen, utilising 1mg/kg of caspofungin on day 1 followed by 0.75mg/kg q 24 h thereafter, resulted in 98% of cats falling within the optimal C_max:MEC ratio from the first dose until the end of the study. Fig 4 shows the predicted distribution of the C_max:MEC ratio over time for the loading dose regimen.

Download:

Fig 2. Plots of caspofungin concentration over time.

A) 0.75mg/kg dosing daily for 7 days, B) 1mg/kg dosing daily for 7 days, C) 1mg/kg every 72 hours for 7 days. Solid black line indicates the median, shaded ribbon shows the 90% CI. Dashed black lines show the putative upper and lower C_max targets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Plots of caspofungin C_max:MEC ratio over time.

A) 0.75mg/kg dosing daily for 7 days, B) 1mg/kg daily dosing for 7 days, C) 1mg/kg every 72 hours for 7 days. Red solid line indicates the median, shaded ribbons show the 95%, 90%, 75% and 50% CI’s in increasingly dark shading. Dashed black lines show the putative upper and lower C_max:MEC ratio limits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Plots of caspofungin C_max:MEC ratio over time utilising a 1mg/kg loading dose on day 1 followed by 0.75 mg/kg daily thereafter.

Red solid line indicates the median, shaded ribbons show the 95%, 90%, 75% and 50% CI’s in increasingly dark shading. Dashed black lines show the putative upper and lower C_max:MEC ratio limits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.g004

The differences between the regimens in terms of time-course of concentration relative to the MEC are highlighted in Table 2, demonstrating that the 1 mg/kg q72 h regimen results in a 50% lower AUC > MEC compared to the 0.75 mg/kg q24 h regimen.

Discussion

This study has investigated the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in healthy adult cats, finding that it is well tolerated and reaches therapeutic plasma levels at the dosing regimen studied. Using an innovative modeling and simulation approach we have shown that doses of 0.75 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg once daily, as well as 1 mg/kg every 72 hours, will reach target therapeutic levels. We have also shown that a loading dose of 1 mg/kg followed by 0.75mg/kg daily will enable 98% of cats to achieve the target therapeutic level after the first-dose.

Caspofungin exhibits linear pharmacokinetics in cats after intravenous administration of a single 1 mg/kg dose as demonstrated in other mammals including rodents (mice, rats), lagomorphs (rabbits) and primates (chimpanzees, rhesus monkeys and humans) [13, 14]. In humans, hepatic degradation of caspofungin to inactive metabolites occurs by non-enzymatic hydrolysis and N-acetylation [33–35]. Cats are deficient in NAT2 and possess a single NAT similar to human NAT1 but with lower affinity and activity [16]. Whether this is the major pathway of caspofungin metabolism in the cat is not known. The elimination half-life of caspofungin in cats (14.5 ± 0.96 h) was longer than that in healthy human adults administered an equivalent 70 mg dose (9.29 ± 1.96 h) [35].

Steady state was achieved at approximately 72 h with trough concentrations of caspofungin in cats at 1 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg daily of approximately 5 μg/mL and 4 μg/mL, respectively. In contrast, humans given 70 mg/kg of caspofungin daily reportedly only achieved steady state during the third week of administration with a lower trough concentration of 2.57 ± 0.34 μg/mL, as a result of a much longer terminal half-life in humans (40–50 h) compared to cats (15 h) [36]. The clearance we report in the typical 4 kg cat (18 mL/min) is larger on a per kg basis than that reported in the typical 70 kg human (10mL/min). We cannot comment on a comparison of volume of distribution as Stone et al [36] did not report this parameter, although it would appear that humans most likely have a larger volume of distribution per kg compared to cats.

Caspofungin was well tolerated by cats with only two adverse events (AE) observed—transient fever and diarrhoea. Since caspofungin exerts its fungicidal activity on the β-glucans, which are essential glucose polymer cell wall components of fungi but not mammals, AE in mammalian species are expected to be low compared to other antifungals [37]. AE in healthy humans administered caspofungin are minimal and mostly comprise infusion reactions [36]. Liver enzyme elevations did not occur in any cats in this study and were uncommon in healthy caspofungin-treated humans [36]. However, AE are higher in patients because of co-morbidities and altered drug metabolism. Rabbits in an IFI model had significantly slower clearance of anidulafungin associated with a higher plasma concentration of drug at the end of the dosing interval compared to healthy individuals [38]. For human patients with IFIs treated with caspofungin, hepatotoxicity and infusion reactions are most common AEs [39]. In caspofungin-treated patients with candidemia liver enzyme elevations (ALT, AST or ALP) were the most frequent laboratory abnormalities (13.9%) and the most common clinical AE were fever (7.5%), chills (5.3%), nausea or vomiting (5.3%) and phlebitis (3.5%) [39]. Other reported infusion reactions to echinocandins in humans, including rash, pruritus, facial swelling and anaphylaxis are mediated by histamine release [40].

Manifestations of acute anaphylaxis are species-dependent and directly related to the locations of the largest population of mast cells, which are the heart and lungs in humans, gastrointestinal tract and liver in dogs, and lungs in cats [41–48]. Thus, animal-models of disease need to account for such species differences and the effect of caspofungin in cats with IFIs needs to be evaluated in prospective studies.

Echinocandins have concentration-dependent activity against Aspergillus spp [49]. In this study, at a dose of 1 mg/kg q 24 h C_max and C_min were well in excess of the highest MECs reported for Aspergillus viridinutans complex species. Caspofungin had MECs of less than 0.06 μg/mL for clinical isolates of A. felis from cats with invasive aspergillosis, except for one isolate in which the MEC was 2 μg/mL [1]. However, other cryptic species in section Fumigati reported to cause invasive aspergillosis in humans and cats have shown decreased susceptibility to caspofungin, including some pathogenic isolates of A. lentulus which had MECs of caspofungin of 4 –>32 μg/mL [32].

In a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis caspofungin dose escalation and dose fractionation was evaluated and C_max: MEC ratio was the parameter most strongly associated with reduced fungal burden, with an optimal value of 10–20. Mice dosed with 1 mg/kg q24 h or 2 mg/kg q48 h had a significantly lower fungal burdens than mice dosed with 1 mg/kg q6 h [29]. At higher doses of 4 mg/kg, correlating to a C_max: MEC >20 there was a paradoxical effect on fungal growth resulting in increased burdens in mice. This paradoxical effect on fungal growth of A. fumigatus has also been observed in vitro for caspofungin [49], and both in vitro and in vivo for other first and second generation echinocandins [50, 51].

Although not proven in clinical trials, the paradoxical growth effect of caspofungin at C_max: MEC > 20 in vivo has led to concerns about possible reduced clinical efficacy using dosing regimens where the C_max greatly exceeds the MEC [29]. In this study, using a dose regimen of 1 mg/kg q24 h, C_max: MEC was > 20 in 42.6% of cats after multiple doses. Our simulated data shows that an optimal C_max: MEC of 10–20 is achieved using 0.75 mg/kg q 24 h or 1 mg/kg q 3 days. However, at the higher dose with a 3 day inter-dosing interval, C_min is well below 1 μg/mL in more than 95% of the population as the prolonged dosing interval does not allow for drug accumulation. Using a daily dose of 0.75 mg/kg, the Cmax: MEC is below 20 and C_min is greater than 2.5 μg/mL for more than 95% of the population. This difference in exposure between doses is also highlighted by the 50% reduction in the cumulative AUC above the MEC for the 1 mg/kg q 72 h regimen compared to 0.75 mg/kg q 24 h. Although both 1 mg/kg q 72 h and 0.75 mg/kg q 24 h provide very similar results for C_max: MEC, the latter regimen is vastly superior in regard to AUC > MEC. Thus, based on the modeling data, a daily dose of 0.75 mg/kg daily is likely to best meet the proposed C_max: MEC window, as well as provide more consistent exposure between doses. Alternatively, utilising a loading dose regimen of 1mg/kg on day 1, followed by 0.75mg/kg daily will rapidly achieve steady state, as well as provide continual exposure between dosing.

The relationship between antifungal in vivo susceptibility, dosages, drug concentrations within various body compartments and toxicological effects are not completely understood. Although our pharmacokinetic analyses have attempted to predict a regimen appropriate for safe and effective use of caspofungin using in vitro MEC values, inherent biological factors can affect therapeutic outcome. For example, in sino-orbital aspergillosis systemic therapy may not be sufficient to penetrate the site of infection and reduce fungal burden. In addition, our work here is based upon total plasma concentrations, and not unbound drug, which may further confound the results. The echinocandins are highly protein bound, and this does not appear to vary across mammalian species investigated [14, 15, 33, 52]. The unique properties of caspofungin create a challenge in determining the precise level of protein binding [14]. However, studies have shown that caspofungin is bound to albumin in serum and that binding in mouse and human serum is equivalent, with an unbound fraction of caspofungin of 3–4%, which is concentration independent [14, 33]. Caspofungin has been shown to bind to albumin in serum [14, 33]. The plasma unbound fraction of caspofungin in the cat was not determined in this study, and although likely to be similar to that of humans and mice, based on similar albumin concentrations in these three species, this should be confirmed in future investigations. The current regimen employed clinically provides total plasma concentrations consistent with the C_max:MEC ratio proposed in the present analyses, suggesting that our simulations are likely to be clinically relevant. Further pharmacodynamic studies are therefore required which can be linked with the pharmacokinetic data presented here, prior to a robust prospective clinical study to document clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed regimens in feline patients affected by sino-orbital aspergillosis.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Summary of caspofungin simulations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178783.s001

(RTF)

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Australian Companion Animal Health Foundation 009/2015. The caspofungin assay internal standard was supplied by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, 1 Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey 08889, USA. VB, AM and JL designed the study. JL, VB and RN obtained the experimental data. DJRF performed modeling and simulation of the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. The Australian Centre for Pharmacometrics is an initiative of the Australian Government as part of the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: VB JL AM.
Data curation: VB JL RN DF.
Formal analysis: JL RN DF AM.
Funding acquisition: VB.
Investigation: JL VB RN.
Methodology: RN DF.
Project administration: VB.
Resources: JL VB RN DF.
Software: DF.
Supervision: VB AM DF RN.
Validation: DF AM FN.
Visualization: DF AM.
Writing – original draft: JL VB.
Writing – review & editing: JL VB AM DF RN.

References

1. Barrs VR, van Doorn TM, Houbraken J, Kidd SE, Martin P, Pinheiro MD, et al. Aspergillus felis sp. nov., an emerging agent of invasive aspergillosis in humans, cats, and dogs. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(6):e64871. pmid:23798996;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Vinh DC, Shea YR, Sugui JA, Parrilla-Castellar ER, Freeman AF, Campbell JW, et al. Invasive aspergillosis due to Neosartorya udagawae. Clinical infectious diseases. 2009;49(1):102–11. pmid:19489714
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Sugui JA, Peterson SW, Figat A, Hansen B, Samson RA, Mellado E, et al. Genetic relatedness versus biological compatibility between Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2014;52(10):3707–21. pmid:25100816;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Barrs VR, Fliegner R, Hocking A, Sleiman S, O'Brien C, Beatty JA, et al. Sinonasal and sino-orbital aspergillosis in 23 cats: aetiology, clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes. Veterinary journal (London, England: 1997). 2012;191(1):58–64. pmid:21388842
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Caspofungin: pharmacology, safety and therapeutic potential in superficial and invasive fungal infections. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2001;10(8):1545–58. pmid:11772269.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Kauffman CA, Carver PL, editors. Update on echinocandin antifungals. Seminars in Respiratory and critical care medicine; 2008: Thieme Medical Publishers.
7. Lynch J, Wong-Beringer A. Caspofungin: a potential cause of reversible severe thrombocytopenia. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2004;24(10):1408–11.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. McCormack PL, Perry CM. Caspofungin: a review of its use in the treament of fungal infections. Drugs. 2005;65(14):2049–68. pmid:16162025.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Meersseman W, Vandecasteele SJ, Wilmer A, Verbeken E, Peetermans WE, Van Wijngaerden E. Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients without malignancy. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2004;170(6):621–5. pmid:15229094.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Perlin DS. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resistance Updates. 2007;10(3):121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2007.04.002. pmid:17569573
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Perlin DS, Hope WW. Echinocandins. Aspergillosis: From Diagnosis to Prevention: Springer; 2010. p. 263–79.
12. Wiederhold NP, Lewis RE. The echinocandin antifungals: an overview of the pharmacology, spectrum and clinical efficacy. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2003;12(8):1313–33. pmid:12882619
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Groll AH, Gullick BM, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Candelario M, Piscitelli SC, et al. Compartmental pharmacokinetics of the antifungal echinocandin caspofungin (MK-0991) in rabbits. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2001;45(2):596–600. pmid:11158761
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Hajdu R, Thompson R, Sundelof JG, Pelak BA, Bouffard FA, Dropinski JF, et al. Preliminary animal pharmacokinetics of the parenteral antifungal agent MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1997;41(11):2339–44. pmid:9371330
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Yamato Y, Kaneko H, Hashimoto T, Katashima M, Ishibashi K, Kawamura A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the antifungal drug micafungin in mice, rats and dogs, and its in vitro protein binding and distribution to blood cells. Japanese Journal of Chemotherapy 2002;50(Supplement1):74–9.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Trepanier L, Cribb A, Spielberg S, Ray K. Deficiency of cytosolic arylamine N-acetylation in the domestic cat and wild felids caused by the presence of a single NAT1-like gene. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8(2):169–79. pmid:10022754.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Beal S, Sheiner L, Boeckmann A, Bauer R. NONMEM 7.3. 0 Users Guides.(1989–2013). ICON Development Solutions, Hanover, MD.
18. Schloerke B, Crowley J, Cook D, Hofmann H, Wickham H, Briatte F, et al. Ggally: Extension to ggplot2. R package version 0.5. 0. http://cranr-projectorg/web/packages/GGally/indexhtml. 2014.
19. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
20. Wickham H. The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;40(1):1–29.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Wickham H. Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2007;21(12):1–20.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Wickham H. scales: Scale functions for graphics. 2014.
23. Wickham H. stringr: Make it easier to work with strings. R package version 06. 2012;2.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Wickham H. Easily Tidy Data with'spread ()'and “gather ()” Functions. CRAN R Package http://cran/R-projectorg/package=tidyr version 041. 2016.
25. Auguie B. gridExtra: functions in Grid graphics. R package version 09. 2012;1.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Harrell Jr FE. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous (Version 3.14–4)[Computer program, R package]. Nashville, TN: Author Retrieved from CRAN R-project org/package = Hmisc. 2014.
27. Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Robison-Cox J, Wright K, Leidi A. doBy: Groupwise statistics, LSmeans, linear contrasts, utilities. R package version. 2014;4:5–13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. Document freely available on the internet at: http://www/r-project.org. 2015.
29. Wiederhold NP, Kontoyiannis DP, Chi J, Prince RA, Tam VH, Lewis RE. Pharmacodynamics of caspofungin in a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: evidence of concentration-dependent activity. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;190(8):1464–71. pmid:15378439.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Espinel-Ingroff A, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Turnidge J. Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Caspofungin and Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method (M38-A2 document). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2011. pmid:21422219;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Posteraro B, Mattei R, Trivella F, Maffei A, Torre A, De Carolis E, et al. Uncommon Neosartorya udagawae Fungus as a Causative Agent of Severe Corneal Infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49(6):2357–60. pmid:21450961;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Balajee SA, Nickle D, Varga J, Marr KA. Molecular studies reveal frequent misidentification of Aspergillus fumigatus by morphotyping. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006;5(10):1705–12. pmid:17030996
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Stone JA, Xu X, Winchell GA, Deutsch PJ, Pearson PG, Migoya EM, et al. Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2004;48(3):815–23. Epub 2004/02/26. pmid:14982770;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Balani SK, Xu X, Arison BH, Silva MV, Gries A, DeLuna FA, et al. Metabolites of caspofungin acetate, a potent antifungal agent, in human plasma and urine. Drug metabolism and disposition. 2000;28(11):1274–8. pmid:11038152.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Mistry GC, Migoya E, Deutsch PJ, Winchell G, Hesney M, Li S, et al. Single-and Multiple-Dose Administration of Caspofungin in Patients With Hepatic Insufficiency: Implications for Safety and Dosing Recommendations. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2007;47(8):951–61. pmid:17660480
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Stone JA, Holland SD, Wickersham PJ, Sterrett A, Schwartz M, Bonfiglio C, et al. Single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in healthy men. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2002;46(3):739–45. pmid:11850256
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Brown GD, Gordon S. Fungal β-glucans and mammalian immunity. Immunity. 2003;19(3):311–5. pmid:14499107.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Lyman CA, Bacher JS, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of anidulafungin (LY303366): reappraisal of its efficacy in neutropenic animal models of opportunistic mycoses using optimal plasma sampling. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2001;45(10):2845–55. pmid:11557479;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, Colombo AL, Thompson-Moya L, Smietana J, et al. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(25):2020–9. pmid:12490683.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Cleary JD, Schwartz M, Rogers PD, Mestral J, Chapman SW. Effects of amphotericin B and caspofungin on histamine expression. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2003;23(8):966–73. pmid:12921242.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Shmuel DL, Cortes Y. Anaphylaxis in dogs and cats. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2013;23(4):377–94. pmid:23855441
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Litster A, Atwell R. Physiological and haematological findings and clinical observations in a model of acute systemic anaphylaxis in Dirofilaria immitis-sensitised cats. Australian veterinary journal. 2006;84(5):151–7. pmid:16739523.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Richardson P, Withrington P. Responses of the simultaneously-perfused hepatic arterial and portal venous vascular beds of the dog to histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. British journal of pharmacology. 1978;64(4):581–8. pmid:728685
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Dean H, Webb R. The morbid anatomy and histology of anaphylaxis in the dog. The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology. 1924;27(1):51–64.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Quantz JE, Miles MS, Reed AL, White GA. Elevation of alanine transaminase and gallbladder wall abnormalities as biomarkers of anaphylaxis in canine hypersensitivity patients. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2009;19(6):536–44. pmid:20017759
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Lautt WW, Legare DJ. Effect of histamine, norepinephrine, and nerves on vascular pressures in dog liver. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1987;252(4):G472–G8. pmid:3565566.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Greenberger PA, Rotskoff BD, Lifschultz B. Fatal anaphylaxis: postmortem findings and associated comorbid diseases. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology. 2007;98(3):252–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Genovese A, Rossi FW, Spadaro G, Galdiero M, Marone G. Human cardiac mast cells in anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis. 95: Karger Publishers; 2010. p. 98–109.
49. Lewis RE, Albert ND, Kontoyiannis DP. Comparison of the dose-dependent activity and paradoxical effect of caspofungin and micafungin in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008;61(5):1140–4. pmid:18305201
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Groll AH, Sein T, Schaufele RL, Francesconi A, et al. Antifungal efficacy of caspofungin (MK-0991) in experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits: pharmacokinetics, drug disposition, and relationship to galactomannan antigenemia. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2002;46(1):12–23. pmid:11751105
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Groll AH, Bell A, Callender DP, Sein T, et al. Antifungal efficacy, safety, and single-dose pharmacokinetics of LY303366, a novel echinocandin B, in experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1998;42(11):2898–905. pmid:9797223;
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Sandhu P, Xu X, Bondiskey PJ, Balani SK, Morris ML, Tang YS, et al. Disposition of caspofungin, a novel antifungal agent, in mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2004;48(4):1272–80. pmid:15047529
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Barrs VR, van Doorn TM, Houbraken J, Kidd SE, Martin P, Pinheiro MD, et al. Aspergillus felis sp. nov., an emerging agent of invasive aspergillosis in humans, cats, and dogs. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(6):e64871. pmid:23798996;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Vinh DC, Shea YR, Sugui JA, Parrilla-Castellar ER, Freeman AF, Campbell JW, et al. Invasive aspergillosis due to Neosartorya udagawae. Clinical infectious diseases. 2009;49(1):102–11. pmid:19489714
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Sugui JA, Peterson SW, Figat A, Hansen B, Samson RA, Mellado E, et al. Genetic relatedness versus biological compatibility between Aspergillus fumigatus and related species. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2014;52(10):3707–21. pmid:25100816;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Barrs VR, Fliegner R, Hocking A, Sleiman S, O'Brien C, Beatty JA, et al. Sinonasal and sino-orbital aspergillosis in 23 cats: aetiology, clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes. Veterinary journal (London, England: 1997). 2012;191(1):58–64. pmid:21388842
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Caspofungin: pharmacology, safety and therapeutic potential in superficial and invasive fungal infections. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2001;10(8):1545–58. pmid:11772269.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Kauffman CA, Carver PL, editors. Update on echinocandin antifungals. Seminars in Respiratory and critical care medicine; 2008: Thieme Medical Publishers.

[ref7] 7. Lynch J, Wong-Beringer A. Caspofungin: a potential cause of reversible severe thrombocytopenia. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2004;24(10):1408–11.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. McCormack PL, Perry CM. Caspofungin: a review of its use in the treament of fungal infections. Drugs. 2005;65(14):2049–68. pmid:16162025.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Meersseman W, Vandecasteele SJ, Wilmer A, Verbeken E, Peetermans WE, Van Wijngaerden E. Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients without malignancy. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2004;170(6):621–5. pmid:15229094.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Perlin DS. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resistance Updates. 2007;10(3):121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2007.04.002. pmid:17569573
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Perlin DS, Hope WW. Echinocandins. Aspergillosis: From Diagnosis to Prevention: Springer; 2010. p. 263–79.

[ref12] 12. Wiederhold NP, Lewis RE. The echinocandin antifungals: an overview of the pharmacology, spectrum and clinical efficacy. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2003;12(8):1313–33. pmid:12882619
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Groll AH, Gullick BM, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Candelario M, Piscitelli SC, et al. Compartmental pharmacokinetics of the antifungal echinocandin caspofungin (MK-0991) in rabbits. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2001;45(2):596–600. pmid:11158761
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Hajdu R, Thompson R, Sundelof JG, Pelak BA, Bouffard FA, Dropinski JF, et al. Preliminary animal pharmacokinetics of the parenteral antifungal agent MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1997;41(11):2339–44. pmid:9371330
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Yamato Y, Kaneko H, Hashimoto T, Katashima M, Ishibashi K, Kawamura A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the antifungal drug micafungin in mice, rats and dogs, and its in vitro protein binding and distribution to blood cells. Japanese Journal of Chemotherapy 2002;50(Supplement1):74–9.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Trepanier L, Cribb A, Spielberg S, Ray K. Deficiency of cytosolic arylamine N-acetylation in the domestic cat and wild felids caused by the presence of a single NAT1-like gene. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8(2):169–79. pmid:10022754.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Beal S, Sheiner L, Boeckmann A, Bauer R. NONMEM 7.3. 0 Users Guides.(1989–2013). ICON Development Solutions, Hanover, MD.

[ref18] 18. Schloerke B, Crowley J, Cook D, Hofmann H, Wickham H, Briatte F, et al. Ggally: Extension to ggplot2. R package version 0.5. 0. http://cranr-projectorg/web/packages/GGally/indexhtml. 2014.

[ref19] 19. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.

[ref20] 20. Wickham H. The split-apply-combine strategy for data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;40(1):1–29.
View Article
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Wickham H. Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2007;21(12):1–20.
View Article
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Wickham H. scales: Scale functions for graphics. 2014.

[ref23] 23. Wickham H. stringr: Make it easier to work with strings. R package version 06. 2012;2.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Wickham H. Easily Tidy Data with'spread ()'and “gather ()” Functions. CRAN R Package http://cran/R-projectorg/package=tidyr version 041. 2016.

[ref25] 25. Auguie B. gridExtra: functions in Grid graphics. R package version 09. 2012;1.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Harrell Jr FE. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous (Version 3.14–4)[Computer program, R package]. Nashville, TN: Author Retrieved from CRAN R-project org/package = Hmisc. 2014.

[ref27] 27. Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Robison-Cox J, Wright K, Leidi A. doBy: Groupwise statistics, LSmeans, linear contrasts, utilities. R package version. 2014;4:5–13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. Document freely available on the internet at: http://www/r-project.org. 2015.

[ref29] 29. Wiederhold NP, Kontoyiannis DP, Chi J, Prince RA, Tam VH, Lewis RE. Pharmacodynamics of caspofungin in a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: evidence of concentration-dependent activity. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;190(8):1464–71. pmid:15378439.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Espinel-Ingroff A, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Turnidge J. Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Caspofungin and Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method (M38-A2 document). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2011. pmid:21422219;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] PubMed/NCBI

[86] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Posteraro B, Mattei R, Trivella F, Maffei A, Torre A, De Carolis E, et al. Uncommon Neosartorya udagawae Fungus as a Causative Agent of Severe Corneal Infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2011;49(6):2357–60. pmid:21450961;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Balajee SA, Nickle D, Varga J, Marr KA. Molecular studies reveal frequent misidentification of Aspergillus fumigatus by morphotyping. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006;5(10):1705–12. pmid:17030996
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Stone JA, Xu X, Winchell GA, Deutsch PJ, Pearson PG, Migoya EM, et al. Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2004;48(3):815–23. Epub 2004/02/26. pmid:14982770;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Balani SK, Xu X, Arison BH, Silva MV, Gries A, DeLuna FA, et al. Metabolites of caspofungin acetate, a potent antifungal agent, in human plasma and urine. Drug metabolism and disposition. 2000;28(11):1274–8. pmid:11038152.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Mistry GC, Migoya E, Deutsch PJ, Winchell G, Hesney M, Li S, et al. Single-and Multiple-Dose Administration of Caspofungin in Patients With Hepatic Insufficiency: Implications for Safety and Dosing Recommendations. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2007;47(8):951–61. pmid:17660480
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Stone JA, Holland SD, Wickersham PJ, Sterrett A, Schwartz M, Bonfiglio C, et al. Single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in healthy men. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2002;46(3):739–45. pmid:11850256
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Brown GD, Gordon S. Fungal β-glucans and mammalian immunity. Immunity. 2003;19(3):311–5. pmid:14499107.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Lyman CA, Bacher JS, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of anidulafungin (LY303366): reappraisal of its efficacy in neutropenic animal models of opportunistic mycoses using optimal plasma sampling. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2001;45(10):2845–55. pmid:11557479;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, Colombo AL, Thompson-Moya L, Smietana J, et al. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(25):2020–9. pmid:12490683.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Cleary JD, Schwartz M, Rogers PD, Mestral J, Chapman SW. Effects of amphotericin B and caspofungin on histamine expression. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2003;23(8):966–73. pmid:12921242.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Shmuel DL, Cortes Y. Anaphylaxis in dogs and cats. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2013;23(4):377–94. pmid:23855441
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Litster A, Atwell R. Physiological and haematological findings and clinical observations in a model of acute systemic anaphylaxis in Dirofilaria immitis-sensitised cats. Australian veterinary journal. 2006;84(5):151–7. pmid:16739523.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Richardson P, Withrington P. Responses of the simultaneously-perfused hepatic arterial and portal venous vascular beds of the dog to histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. British journal of pharmacology. 1978;64(4):581–8. pmid:728685
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Dean H, Webb R. The morbid anatomy and histology of anaphylaxis in the dog. The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology. 1924;27(1):51–64.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Quantz JE, Miles MS, Reed AL, White GA. Elevation of alanine transaminase and gallbladder wall abnormalities as biomarkers of anaphylaxis in canine hypersensitivity patients. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2009;19(6):536–44. pmid:20017759
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Lautt WW, Legare DJ. Effect of histamine, norepinephrine, and nerves on vascular pressures in dog liver. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1987;252(4):G472–G8. pmid:3565566.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Greenberger PA, Rotskoff BD, Lifschultz B. Fatal anaphylaxis: postmortem findings and associated comorbid diseases. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology. 2007;98(3):252–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Genovese A, Rossi FW, Spadaro G, Galdiero M, Marone G. Human cardiac mast cells in anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis. 95: Karger Publishers; 2010. p. 98–109.

[ref49] 49. Lewis RE, Albert ND, Kontoyiannis DP. Comparison of the dose-dependent activity and paradoxical effect of caspofungin and micafungin in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008;61(5):1140–4. pmid:18305201
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Groll AH, Sein T, Schaufele RL, Francesconi A, et al. Antifungal efficacy of caspofungin (MK-0991) in experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits: pharmacokinetics, drug disposition, and relationship to galactomannan antigenemia. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2002;46(1):12–23. pmid:11751105
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Groll AH, Bell A, Callender DP, Sein T, et al. Antifungal efficacy, safety, and single-dose pharmacokinetics of LY303366, a novel echinocandin B, in experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1998;42(11):2898–905. pmid:9797223;
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Sandhu P, Xu X, Bondiskey PJ, Balani SK, Morris ML, Tang YS, et al. Disposition of caspofungin, a novel antifungal agent, in mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2004;48(4):1272–80. pmid:15047529
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Pharmacokinetic study

Animals.

Drug administration and blood sampling.

Analytical method.

Population pharmacokinetics analysis and dose regimen simulations

Methods software.

General modeling strategy.

Covariate model building.

Model evaluation.

Caspofungin dose regimen simulations.

Results

Pharmacokinetic modeling

Caspofungin dose regimen simulations.

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Table. Summary of caspofungin simulations.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References