Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Consumption of fortified infant foods reduces dietary diversity but has a positive effect on subsequent growth in infants from Sumedang district, Indonesia

Abstract

Stunting and underweight among under-five children in Indonesia are common, raising public health concerns. Whether inappropriate complementary feeding (CF) practices compromise optimal growth during late infancy in Indonesia is uncertain. Therefore we characterized and evaluated CF practices in Indonesian infants and investigated their relationship with subsequent growth. We enrolled breastfed infants at 6 months of age (n = 230); and followed them at 9 (n = 202) and 12 months of age (n = 190). We collected socio-demographic and anthropometric data and two-day in-home weighed food records. Relations between WHO CF indicators, sentinel foods, and energy and micronutrient intakes at 9 months and growth at 12 months were explored using multiple linear regression. Stunting and underweight increased from 15.8% and 4.4% at 6 months to 22.6% and 10.5% at 12 months, respectively. Median intakes of calcium, iron, zinc, and riboflavin were below WHO recommendations. Infants consuming fortified infant foods (FIFs) at 9 months had diets with a lower dietary diversity (DD) score (2.3 vs.3.0), energy density, median energy (250 vs. 310 kcal/d) and protein (6.5 vs. 9.1 g/d) intake than non-consumers (p<0.01), despite higher intakes of calcium, iron, and vitamins A and C (p<0.001). Positive relations existed for 9-month consumption of iron-rich/iron fortified infant foods with length-for-age Z-score (LAZ) at 12 months (β = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.44; P = 0.04), and for fortified infant foods alone with both LAZ (β = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.48; P = 0.04) and weight-for-age Z-score (β = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.26; P = 0.02) at 12 months. The positive association of FIFs with subsequent growth may be attributed to their content of both powdered cow’s milk and multi-micronutrient fortificants. Nonetheless, mothers should not be encouraged to over-rely on FIFs as they reduce DD.

Introduction

Childhood undernutrition remains a significant problem in Indonesia, even though there have been major improvements in health over past decades. In 2013, among under-five children, mortality rates were 32 per 1000 live births [1], 20% were underweight, and 37% were stunted [2]. Such growth faltering often begins around 4–7 months of age [3, 4], and is accompanied by a high prevalence of anemia and co-existing micronutrient deficiencies [5, 6].

Despite very high national breast feeding rates at six months (76%) [7], progress in improving complementary feeding practices in Indonesia has been slow [8]. The rice-based gruels traditionally used for complementary feeding often have low energy and nutrient density [9]leading to nutrient deficits when compared with estimated needs [10], particularly for calcium, iron, and zinc [11]. Such deficits may be exacerbated both by the displacement of breast milk if complementary feeding is introduced prior to six months of age, and poor appetite induced by infection [12].

The World Health Organization (WHO) has set a global target to reduce childhood stunting by 40% by 2025 [13]. Achieving this goal is a priority for Indonesia. Guiding principles for the complementary feeding of the breastfed child have been developed [14] but whether they are widely practiced in Indonesia is uncertain. Therefore, in an initial survey, we studied a group of breastfed infants from the Sumedang district, West Java province, Indonesia, a district with rates of stunting (41.1%) and underweight (14.6%) comparable to the national prevalence in Indonesia [2]. Our objectives were to: 1) characterize and evaluate prevailing complementary feeding practices, 2) assess the adequacy of energy and nutrient intakes during complementary feeding, and 3) investigate relationships between WHO complementary feeding indicators, local sentinel food groups, nutrient adequacy, and subsequent infant growth in a cohort of breast-fed infants at 6, 9, and 12 months of age. In view of the increasing use of fortified infant foods by mothers in Asia [15, 16], we also examined these relationships with the consumption of fortified infant foods. We envisaged that our study might lead to the development of interventions to improve complementary feeding practices and reduce risk of infection. Appropriate feeding practices during early childhood are essential because interventions after the first two years appear to have little impact on subsequent child growth [17].

Methods

Study site and participant recruitment

This prospective cohort study was conducted in Tanjungsari, Sukasari, and Pamulihan sub-districts of Sumedang district, West Java, Indonesia between August 2014 and August 2015. Sumedang district has a population of 1.1 million and an area of ~152 hectares, of which 22% is used for rice paddy plantation. The climate is tropical with rain most months and only a short dry season [7]. The majority of the population are Muslim of Sundanese ethnicity. Infants were enrolled at 6 months of age and randomly selected from all the villages (n = 30) in the three sub-districts using local birth registry data. Selected measurements were recorded on the infants (mean,SD) at 6 (±4 weeks), 9 (±4 weeks), and 12 (±4 weeks) months of age.

Infants were eligible for inclusion if they were not premature (>37 weeks gestation), ≥1500 g at birth, apparently healthy with no evidence of chronic disease or acute malnutrition, and had received predominant/exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months of age. The sample size of 200 healthy breastfed infants was calculated to be able to estimate the prevalence of stunting (length-for-age Z-score (LAZ) < -2SD) with a 95% confidence interval precision of at most 7%. This sample size also allows us to conduct regression analyses involving several variables with at least a minimum of 10 respondents per variable in the model [18]. Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Ethics Committees of Padjadjaran University, Indonesia, and the University of Otago, New Zealand. Informed written consent to participate in the study was given by the parents or primary guardians of the infants. Participants were free to withdraw from the study at any time.

Socio-demographic and health status

Pre-tested questionnaires were administered by trained research assistants during home visits when data on socio-demographic collected at baseline, and health status, sanitation and hygiene at 6, 9 and 12 months of age. The measures of health status collected included morbidity in the last two weeks arising from fever, cough, diarrhea, vomiting, history of hospitalisation, and immunisation status. Sensitive information on sanitation facilities was recorded by in-home observations.

Anthropometry

Weight and recumbent length were measured on infants at aged 6, 9, and 12 months by trained research assistants with infants unclothed or wearing a weighed diaper using standardized techniques [19] and calibrated equipment [20]. Weight was recorded to the nearest 10 g (Seca 334, Seca GmbH & Co. KG., Hamburg, Germany) and length to the nearest millimeter (Seca 417, Seca GmbH & Co. KG., Hamburg, Germany). Measurements were recorded in duplicate, or triplicate if the difference between first and second measurement was more than recommended [21]. Both inter- and intra-examiner technical error for each anthropometric measurement were acceptable based on 20 (non-study) 6-month old infants. Maternal height (to nearest millimeter) and weight (to nearest 100 g) at recruitment were also measured at baseline. Z-scores for length-for-age, weight-for-length (WLZ), and weight-for-age (WAZ) were calculated using the most recent WHO growth reference data [22] and WHO AnthroPlus 3.2.2. None of the infants had unacceptably extreme anthropometric values defined as ± 3 SD [23].

Assessment of complementary food intakes

Trained volunteer community health workers (cadres) weighed (Kitchen Scale EK3131, Camry Electronic Ltd, Guangdong, China) 12-h day-time food intakes of infants in their homes on two non-consecutive days within one week. Mothers recorded the night-time foods and amounts consumed during the previous 12-h in household measures, with amounts converted to gram equivalents by the community health workers (cadres) which were used to estimate total 24-h intakes of complementary foods at 6, 9, and 12 months of age. Ingredients of mixed dishes and the amount consumed were also weighed and the weight of the actual ingredients consumed by the child calculated [24]. For purchased foods, average recipes were compiled from local recipes and used to calculate the average energy and nutrient content of each purchased food.

Compilation of a local complementary food composition table

Energy and selected nutrient composition values for the complementary foods consumed were taken primarily from the Indonesian food composition table developed for the SMILING Project [25] and the FAO/INFOODS Food Composition Databases for Asia [26], augmented where necessary with nutrient values from the US Department of Agriculture [27] and ProPan 2.0 [28]. Micronutrients chosen were based on the availability of reliable nutrient composition data of Indonesian foods and their perceived public health relevance for complementary feeding. Nutrient values for all wheat flour products were adjusted to reflect the government mandatory fortification levels (thiamine 2.5 mg/kg, riboflavin 4 mg/kg, iron 50 mg/kg, and zinc 30 mg/kg) [29]. For 13 frequently consumed commercially processed plant-based complementary foods, values for iron, zinc, calcium were compiled from chemical analysis of at least three samples of each item, as described earlier [30, 31]. Vitamin A values were re-calculated where necessary and presented as retinol activity equivalents (RAE) [32]. Nutrient values for 54 mixed dishes were calculated from weighed recipe data taking into account appropriate yield and retention factors [33]. Phytate values were compiled from the literature [31, 34, 35] or imputed where necessary, and adjusted for differences in moisture content. This local food composition table was then used with the digitized 24-h dietary records to calculate the energy and nutrient intakes of the infants on each of the two-recorded days.

Assessment of energy and nutrient intakes and adequacy of complementary foods

Median (25th, 75th percentile) daily intakes from complementary foods of energy and selected nutrients at 6, 9, and 12 months were calculated and compared with estimated needs from complementary foods alone based on FAO/WHO/UNU (2004) [36], energy requirements (per day; per kg/body weight), and WHO/FAO [37], and recommended nutrient intakes (assuming average breast milk volume and composition) [38]. For zinc, the recommended nutrient intake compiled by Brown et al. [39] was used. Median (25th, 75th percentile) daily intakes from complementary foods of energy and selected nutrients at 9 months were also calculated for those infants who did or did not consume fortified infant products, primarily to assess the impact of fortification of infant foods on the complementary feeding regime. A summary indicator—overall mean adequacy ratio (MAR)—was also calculated to reflect the overall adequacy of the micronutrient intakes of the infants at each age. The MARs are derived from nutrient adequacy ratios (NARs) by dividing the actual nutrient intakes from complementary foods for each infant by the corresponding estimated needs, expressed as percentages. After capping the NARs at 100%, they were then averaged to generate MARs for all the infants, and for those who did or did not consume fortified infant foods at 9 months [40]. Median (25th, 75th percentile) micronutrient densities (amount per 100 kcal food) were also calculated for the infants at each age and compared with the desired nutrient densities [10].

Compilation of infant and young child (IYCF) complementary feeding indicators

All infants were breast-fed, with the exception of four infants at 12 months of age. The individual weighed food record data was used to assess whether each infant met or did not meet (Yes/No) the five core WHO population-level complementary feeding indicators [41, 42], and the proportion of the infants at aged 6, 9, and 12 months meeting each indicator was then calculated. The WHO indicators used were: 1) consumption of solid, semi-solid or soft foods; 2) minimum dietary diversity (MDD) ≥4 food groups; 3) minimum meal frequency (MMF); 4) consumption of a minimum acceptable diet (MAD); and 5) consumption of iron-rich (i.e., flesh foods) and/or iron fortified foods. For the MDD indicator, the seven WHO food groups were used [41] with no minimum quantity of consumption defined: 1) grains, roots, and tubers; 2) legumes and nuts; 3) dairy products (milk, yogurt, cheese; infant formula); 4) eggs; 5) flesh foods (meat, fish, poultry, and liver/organ meats); 6) vitamin A–rich fruits and vegetables; and 7) other fruits and vegetables. Significant ingredients in a mixed dish were allocated to food groups separately. In addition, the proportion of infants at each age consuming four WHO nutrient-dense sentinel food group indicators (flesh foods, dairy products, eggs, and animal-source foods), and a local sentinel food termed “fortified infant foods” was also calculated. The fortified infant foods comprised infant formulae, fortified infant cereals and rusks, many of which also contained significant amounts of dried milk powder. Clear broths from simmered dishes and soups were not included in the compilation of the MDD, MMF or MAD indicators.

Dietary diversity was calculated by summing the number of the seven food groups [41, 42] consumed at least once during the two days of food records at each age. MDD was defined as the consumption of four or more food groups at least once during the two record days. Meal frequency was calculated as an average of the sum of the number of meals (other than trivial amounts <10 g) consumed over each of the two food record days. MMF for breast-fed infants was defined as having consumed 2 or more solid, semisolid, or soft meals per day for each of the two food record days at 6 months and 3 or more meals per day at 9 and 12 months of age [41]. MAD was defined as meeting the requirements for both MDD and MMF for breast-fed infants at each age. Consumption of iron-rich/iron-fortified foods was defined as having consumed a flesh food and/or an iron-fortified food specially designed for infants and young children at least once out of the two record days. We also calculated the data for the WHO IYCF indicators and the four sentinel food groups and fortified infant foods based on day 1 only in order to compare our one day data with previously published data based on single 24-hr recalls.

Statistical analysis

Data were transferred into Stata® 12 (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA), and descriptive and comparative statistics calculated. All continuous variables were visually assessed for normality. Maternal education was categorized as primary school or less, secondary school, and college/university. An asset-based wealth index was calculated using principal component analysis based on asset variables recommended for use in the Indonesian Demographic Health Survey [1], and following the DHS Wealth Index guidelines [43]. This continuous index was then divided into quintiles from the lowest to highest household wealth. Spearman rank correlations were conducted to assess the relation between dietary diversity scores and NARs for all infants and stratified for those consuming or not consuming fortified infant foods at 9 months. Differences in the median intakes of energy and nutrients for those infants consuming and not consuming fortified infant foods at 9 months were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Differences between maternal/household characteristics of those infants consuming and not consuming fortified infant foods were tested using t-test (for continuous variables) and chi-squared (for categorical variables).

Multiple linear regression was used to investigate associations between each of LAZ, WAZ, and WLZ at 12 months as the dependent variables and, in turn, the following independent categorical variables at 9 mo: four core WHO IYCF indicators (MDD based on WHO seven food groups) [44], MMF, MAD, consumption of iron-rich/iron-fortified foods; consumption of the five sentinel foods groups: dairy products (FG 3); flesh foods (FG 4); eggs (FG 5); animal-source foods (dairy products, flesh foods and eggs), and fortified infant foods; and intakes of critical growth-limiting nutrients–protein, zinc, iron, calcium, and riboflavin (per day; per 100 kcal; per kg body weight).

All indicators were calculated from data generated over two non-consecutive days, with consumption of sentinel food groups counted when consumed at least once over the two days. All the fully adjusted linear regression analyses for assessing the impact of the complementary feeding regime on growth at 12 months included the following covariates: maternal height, sex, wealth index (quintiles), and maternal education as well as the respective 9-mo LAZ, WLZ, or WAZ data. Model assumptions were checked using residual plots, and Levene’s test was additionally used to assess homogeneity of variance and heteroscedasticity. All analyses were conducted using Stata® 12, and a 2-sided p < 0.05 level of significance was used in all cases.

Results

Maternal socio-demographic status and infant characteristics at birth

A total of 275 6-month-old infants were approached initially, and details of the enrolment, refusal and subsequent withdrawals are shown in Fig 1. Of the 230 enrolled, 190 completed the study (completion rate, 82.6%); the main reason for withdrawal was the repeated blood sampling (Fig 1). Of the mothers, very few were underweight (7.3%), but 36.4% had body mass indexes (BMIs) classified as overweight or obese (i.e., BMI ≥25). Almost all mothers were housewives (91.6%), of whom more than 60% had completed at least secondary school; most fathers were manual labourers or farmers without a regular income (Table 1). Most households had an improved water source and toilet facility. Almost all the infants (96.8%) recruited had a birth weight between 2500–4500 g, as measured within 1–3 days by the midwives.

thumbnail
Table 1. Maternal, socio-demographic status and infant birth characteristics at baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.t001

Anthropometric status at 6, 9, and 12 months

Mean Z-scores (LAZ, WLZ, and WAZ) declined with increasing age (Table 2). The prevalence of stunting and underweight at 6 months increased from 15.7% (95% CI, 11.3–20.9%) and 3.9% (95% CI, 2.1–7.5%) respectively, to 22.6% (95% CI, 17.6–29.8%) and 10.5% (95% CI, 7.0–16.1%) at 12 months. In contrast, the prevalence of wasting was much lower (1.7%, 95% CI, 0.4–4.1% at 6 months) and relatively stable (3.2%, 95% CI, 1.4–7.0% at 12 months).

thumbnail
Table 2. Anthropometric characteristics of infants at 6, 9, and 12 months.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.t002

Infant and young child feeding practices

All the infants continued to be breastfed from six months of age, although by 12 months of age, four were no longer being breastfed. Almost all were receiving solid, semi-solid, or soft foods at 6 months, usually at least twice per day (Table 3). However, dietary diversity at 6 months was low, with less than 3% of infants achieving a MDD of ≥ 4 food groups, and thus few infants met the MAD threshold. Indeed, 63.6% of the infants were consuming only one or two food groups at 6 months, of which grains, roots and tubers, fruits and vegetables, and/or iron-fortified infant foods predominated (data not shown). At 9 and 12 months, the proportion consuming diets achieving the MDD and MAD thresholds increased markedly, as the range of food groups consumed rose (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Number and percentage of infants meeting five core WHO complementary feeding indicators and consuming four sentinel food groups at 6, 9, and 12 months.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.t003

Almost all of the infants at 6 months (92.2%) consumed iron-rich foods (i.e., iron-fortified foods or flesh foods), most of which were fortified infant cereal-based porridges and biscuits. Only nine children (i.e., 4.2%) consumed fortified formula milk. At age 9 and 12 months, even fewer infants consumed fortified formula milk (9 months: n = 2, 1.0%; 12 months: n = 8, 4.3%), with the proportion consuming cereal-based porridges and biscuits also declining progressively during this time. As a result, the portion size of fortified foods consumed (dry weight) averaged 12.1 g/portion (SD: 7.9) at 9 months, falling to an average of 7.8 g/portion (SD: 8.1) at 12 months. At 9 and 12 months, while consumption of fortified infant foods decreased progressively, consumption of flesh foods, notably meat balls and sausages, increased over this time period, providing a greater proportion of the iron-rich/iron fortified food group at 9 and 12 months (Table 3). It is noteworthy, that when the data in Table 3 were recalculated based on day 1 intakes only (S1 Table), then the proportion of infants meeting the MDD and MAD and consuming the four sentinel food groups and fortified infant foods was consistently lower at each age.

Intakes of energy and selected nutrients and their micronutrient adequacy

Not surprisingly, median intakes from complementary foods of energy and most nutrients increased progressively with age (Table 4). Although median energy intakes at all ages were below the absolute estimated energy requirement, when expressed per kilogram body weight to account for the small size of the infants, median energy intakes met requirements at 9 and 12 months but not at 6 months. There were consistent deficits in several micronutrients, most notably for median intakes for calcium and iron at all three ages, riboflavin at 9 and 12 months, and zinc at 6 and 9 months of age (Table 4). For thiamine, no deficit was observed based on the assumption that the infants, irrespective of age, met their needs for thiamine from breast milk alone. Maternal thiamine status and thus breast milk thiamine concentrations were likely to be adequate as the mothers were consuming wheat flour products fortified with thiamine (2.5 mg/kg). Whether deficits in niacin existed is uncertain as the contribution of niacin from tryptophan was not included in the data presented in Table 4. In contrast, protein intakes exceeded the estimated needs from complementary foods at 9 and 12 months, although there was a slight shortfall at 6 months.

thumbnail
Table 4. Estimated need and median (IQR) energy and nutrient intakes from complementary food at 6, 9, and 12 months.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.t004

Nutrient densities (i.e., intakes per 100 kcal) were also examined relative to the desired nutrient densities. However, these results are not included here because the low energy intakes shown in Table 4 limit the interpretation of the nutrient densities.

Intakes of energy and selected nutrients in relation to consumption of fortified infant foods

Significant differences existed for the median intakes of energy and several nutrients from complementary foods among infants at 9 months of age consuming fortified vs. non-fortified infant foods (Table 5). Of note is the significantly lower energy intake of infants consuming fortified foods, whereas intakes of vitamin C, vitamin A, calcium and iron (but not zinc) were higher (P<0.001), as expected. The MARs, summary indicators of the adequacy (as %) of all the nutrient intakes examined at 9 mo, differed according to whether infants were consuming (n = 69) or not consuming (n = 123) fortified infant foods (66±13% vs. 60±13%; P = 0.05), respectively at this time (data not shown).

thumbnail
Table 5. Median (IQR) of energy density, intakes of energy and nutrients of infants consuming and not consuming infant fortified foods at 9 months.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.t005

In general, no differences existed in the maternal and household status variables or the characteristics of those infants who consumed or did not consume fortified infant foods; notable exceptions were the maternal education and wealth index variables. Higher maternal education (p = 0.007) and wealth index score (p<0.001) was noted for those infants who consumed fortified infant foods compared to those who did not consume fortifed foods.

Relationships between nutrient adequacy, complementary feeding indicators, sentinel food groups and subsequent growth

Data were not examined at 6 mo because so few infants met the MDD or MAD indicators (both 2.8%) (Table 3). At 9 mo, the NARs showed positive correlations with dietary diversity scores for all infants (r = 0.38; p<0.0001) and for those not consuming fortified infant foods (r = 0.54; p<0.0001), but not for those consuming fortified infant foods.

The relationship between three core WHO complementary feeding indicators at 9 months and subsequent growth at 12 months is shown in Table 6. Morbidity defined by diarrhea was not included in the model because it was not a significant variable in the univariate regression analysis. Of the three indicators, consumption of iron-rich/iron fortified infant foods at 9 months was the only indicator that was positively associated with linear growth (P = 0.04) at 12 months in the fully adjusted models. Of the four sentinel foods also investigated at 9 months, fortified infant foods alone were positively and significantly related to a greater LAZ and WAZ at 12 months. It is noteworthy that LAZ, WLZ, and WAZ had a stronger effect on subsequent growth at 12 months than minimum dietary diversity, with β-coefficients of ~0.8 for LAZ,~0.9 for WLZ; and ~ 1.0 for WAZ. No significant associations were observed with growth at 12 months for the average daily intakes at 9 months of the critical growth-limiting nutrients (protein, zinc, iron, calcium, and riboflavin) expressed per day or per kg body weight, or for the NARs for the infants (data not shown).

thumbnail
Table 6. WHO complementary feeding indicators and sentinel food indicators at aged 9 months in relation to LAZ, WLZ, and WAZ-scores at 12 months.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.t006

Discussion

The increase in the prevalence of stunting from 6 to 12 months of age observed here was also reported in the 2010 Indonesian National Health Report [45] and has been seen in other low income countries in the region [4648]. We found that transition from exclusive breastfeeding to complementary feeding in the Sumedang district was not in accordance with the WHO guiding principles for breastfed children [14], and the complementary diets were inadequate in both quantity and quality.

Unlike several earlier studies [4951], we found no associations between either dietary diversity or MAD and subsequent growth. Instead, intake of iron-rich (i.e., flesh foods/iron fortified infant foods) at 9 months was associated with a greater LAZ at 12 months. When the effect of flesh foods and iron-fortified infant foods on growth was examined separately (Table 6), only the intake of fortified infant foods was associated with a greater LAZ (Table 6, β, 0.29, P = 0.04) and a greater WAZ (β, 0.14, P = 0.02) at 12 months. Lack of a positive effect of flesh foods on linear growth in this study is not unexpected given that major flesh food items consumed by the infants at aged 9 months were predominantly cereal-based meat balls and sausages.

The positive outcome of infant fortified foods on growth reported here in contrast to some earlier studies of micronutrient fortified complementary foods [5256] may have arisen because most of the specialized infant foods consumed by almost all of the Sumedang infants at 6 months (91.7%) and about a third (35.8%) at 9 months were fortified, not only with micronutrients, but also with cow’s milk powder. The growth-stimulating effects of milk on growth are now recognized. Several investigators have shown that the consumption of cow’s milk, both unfortified [57] and fortified [5861] promotes growth during childhood, perhaps through the stimulation of insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Milk is also a source of several other growth-promoting constituents, including high quality protein, lactose, calcium, potassium, magnesium and phosphorus [62, 63].

Interestingly, the energy density the diets of those infants consuming fortified infant foods was lower than for the non-consumers (1.2 kcal/g vs. 1.5 kcal/g; P<0.006) at aged 9 months. Likewise, intakes of energy and protein (per day) of these consumers were significantly lower than for the non-consumers (Table 5). These findings probably arose because caregivers prepared porridges from these expensive fortified infant products with a lower dry matter content (e.g., diluted) in an effort to make them more long lasting. Hence, despite almost all infants achieving MMF, this practice may have been responsible, at least in part, for the deficits in some of the micronutrients observed when compared with the estimated needs (Table 4). Whether there were also shortfalls in energy is uncertain; estimates for absolute energy requirements shown in Table 4 could be over-estimated because of the small size of these infants together with their inability to experience full catch-up growth because of the challenges of overcoming inter-generational growth stunting [64, 65].

We did not calculate micronutrient density adequacies because the low energy intakes reported here distort the nutrient density data. Instead we calculated NARs and found a strong correlation between NARs and dietary diversity scores for the “non-consumers” of infant fortified foods (r = 0.54, P<0.0001), but not for consumers. Failure to observe a relationship between dietary diversity scores and NARs with the “consumers of fortified infant foods” has been reported elsewhere [44, 66], and is not unexpected as the single food group—fortified infant foods—supplied ~ 56%, 50%, and 49%, of the total intake of iron, zinc, and calcium, respectively at 9 months. These findings highlight that even in this underprivileged rural setting, consumption of expensive fortified infant foods limits the usefulness of dietary diversity scores as a proxy for micronutrient adequacy. However, MDD is intended as an overall measure of dietary quality, not only indicating micronutrient adequacy, but also a high likelihood of consuming ≥ 1 animal-source food and ≥ 1 fruit or vegetable in addition to a staple food [41]. Further, infants benefit from increased dietary diversity as the exposure to novel foods of differing textures and flavors facilitates the development of healthy food preferences [67].

Strengths and limitations

We employed a longitudinal design, and collected a comprehensive range of qualitative measures and quantitative nutrient intakes at the individual level making it possible to identify potential dietary causes of impaired growth among infants who reside in Sumedang district. Nevertheless, we restricted our evaluation of nutrient adequacy to eight key micronutrients, and excluded vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, and folate included elsewhere [44, 69] because of the paucity of reliable Indonesian nutrient composition values for these micronutrients.

We also acknowledge that despite collecting two-day in-home weighed food intakes, our data on energy and nutrient adequacies has some uncertainties. For our population we assumed literature values for breast milk volume and composition rather than direct measurements, even though poor maternal status has the potential to reduce breast milk concentrations of vitamin A, riboflavin and niacin [38], all micronutrients seemingly “at risk” in the complementary diets reported here. Finally, we chose to use the WHO/FAO RNIs, except for zinc rather than the most recent values compiled by EFSA [70] to facilitate comparison of our data with published reports in other low income countries. It is also important to note that the consistently lower proportion of infants at each age meeting the MDD and MAD and consuming the four sentinel food groups and fortified infant foods from day 1 only instead of the two non-consecutive days collected here highlights the importance of collecting data representative of usual intakes, whenever possible, to avoid misleading conclusions [68].

Implications for programs

Our results indicate that despite receiving fortified infant foods, intakes of selected micronutrients from complementary foods for Sumedang infants across all three ages failed to meet the estimated needs. Caregivers should prepare infant fortified foods with the recommended dry matter content. However, they should not be encouraged to over-rely on fortified infant foods as they reduce dietary diversity. Instead, caregivers should be encouraged to increase the consumption of appropriate and affordable animal-source foods (i.e., dairy products, flesh foods, and eggs) and fruits and vegetables over the complementary feeding period to ensure the infant’s diets achieve the WHO indicators for MDD and MAD. In this way infants will become familiar with a variety of textures and flavors, and will consume potentially important bioactive compounds not present in fortified infant foods [67, 71]. Finally, our results emphasize the use of a local sentinel food groupfortified infant foodsas a practical indicator in this setting for predicting subsequent infant growth.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Infant and young child feeding practices of infants in Sumedang district, Indonesia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.s001

(XLSX)

S1 Table. Number and percentage of infants meeting five core WHO complementary feeding indicators and consuming four sentinel food groups at 6, 9, and 12 months on day 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175952.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Prof. Anna Alisjahbana, Frontiers for Health (F2H), the people of the communities, and our team of dedicated research assistants.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: LH AD RSG.
  2. Data curation: AD DMP.
  3. Formal analysis: AD JJH RSG LH SRM.
  4. Funding acquisition: LH RSG.
  5. Investigation: AD GIN DMP IN PDH.
  6. Methodology: AD LH RSG.
  7. Project administration: AD LH GIN RSG.
  8. Resources: LH GIN AD JJH.
  9. Software: AD JJH.
  10. Supervision: LH RSG.
  11. Validation: JJH.
  12. Visualization: AD LH RSG JJH SRM.
  13. Writing – original draft: AD LH RSG.
  14. Writing – review & editing: AD RSG LH GIN DMP IN PDH SRM JJH.

References

  1. 1. Statistics Indonesia (Badan Pusat Statistik-BPS), National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN), and the Ministry of Health (Kemenkes-MoH), and ICF International. Indonesia Demographic Health Survey 2012. Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS, BKKBN, Kemenkes, and ICF International, 2013.
  2. 2. National Institute of Health Research and Development. Indonesia Basic Health Research 2013. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of Indonesia, 2013.
  3. 3. Kolsteren PW, Kusin JA, Kardjati S. Pattern of linear growth velocities of infants from birth to 12 months in Madura, Indonesia. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2(3):291–301. Epub 1997/03/01. pmid:9491111
  4. 4. Kusin JA, Kardjati S, van Steenbergen WM, Renqvist UH. Nutritional transition during infancy in East Java, Indonesia: 2. A longitudinal study of growth in relation to the intake of breast milk and additional foods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991;45(2):77–84. Epub 1991/02/01. pmid:2050091
  5. 5. Dijkhuizen MA, Wieringa FT, West CE, Muherdiyantiningsih, Muhilal. Concurrent micronutrient deficiencies in lactating mothers and their infants in Indonesia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(4):786–91. pmid:11273854
  6. 6. Lind T, Lonnerdal B, Stenlund H, Gamayanti IL, Ismail D, Seswandhana R, et al. A community-based randomized controlled trial of iron and zinc supplementation in Indonesian infants: effects on growth and development. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(3):729–36. pmid:15321815
  7. 7. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Sumedang. Profil Daerah Kabupaten Sumedang tahun 2014. BAPPEDA Sumedang, 2014.
  8. 8. Ng CS, Dibley MJ, Agho KE. Complementary feeding indicators and determinants of poor feeding practices in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of 2007 Demographic and Health Survey data. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(5):827–39. pmid:22014663
  9. 9. Isabelle M, Chan P. Seminar on young child nutrition: improving nutrition and health status of young children in indonesia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011;20(1):141–7. pmid:21393122
  10. 10. Dewey KG, Brown KH. Update on technical issues concerning complementary feeding of young children in developing countries and implications for intervention programs. Food Nutr Bull. 2003;24(1):5–28. pmid:12664525
  11. 11. Dewey KG. Reducing stunting by improving maternal, infant and young child nutrition in regions such as South Asia: evidence, challenges and opportunities. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12 Suppl 1:27–38.
  12. 12. Dewey KG, Mayers DR. Early child growth: how do nutrition and infection interact? Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7 Suppl 3:129–42.
  13. 13. de Onis M, Dewey KG, Borghi E, Onyango AW, Blossner M, Daelmans B, et al. The World Health Organization's global target for reducing childhood stunting by 2025: rationale and proposed actions. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9 Suppl 2:6–26. Epub 2013/10/23.
  14. 14. Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
  15. 15. Huffman SL, Piwoz EG, Vosti SA, Dewey KG. Babies, soft drinks and snacks: a concern in low- and middle-income countries? Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10(4):562–74. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4299489. pmid:24847768
  16. 16. Pries AM, Huffman SL, Adhikary I, Upreti SR, Dhungel S, Champeny M, et al. High consumption of commercial food products among children less than 24 months of age and product promotion in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12 Suppl 2:22–37.
  17. 17. Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):417–40. pmid:18206226
  18. 18. Schumacker R, Lomax R. A beginner's guide to structural equation modelling. New York: Rouledge; 2010.
  19. 19. World Health Organization. Anthropometry training video: the WHO multicenter growth reference study (DVD version). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
  20. 20. Gibson RS. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. 2nd ed: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  21. 21. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Van den Broeck J, Chumlea WC, Martorell R. Measurement and standardization protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25(1 Suppl):S27–36. pmid:15069917
  22. 22. World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Methods and development: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age France: WHO, 2006.
  23. 23. World Health Organization. Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: WHO, 1995.
  24. 24. Gibson SR, Ferguson EL. An interactive 24-hour recall for assessing the adequacy of iron and zinc intakes in developing countries. Washington DC: International Life Sciences Institute, 2008.
  25. 25. Sustainable Micronutrient Interventions to Control Deficiencies and Improve Nutritional Status and General Health in Asia (SMILING) Project. c2013. [updated 2013 August 23, cited 2016 Sept 26]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/food_composition/documents/FCT_SMILING_PROJECT_ASIA/D3_5b_SMILING_FCT_QA_Indonesia_070813.xlsx
  26. 26. FAO/INFOODS Food Composition Databases for Asia. [updated 2016 Feb 11, cited 2016 Sept 26]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/infoods/infoods/tables-and-databases/asia/en/
  27. 27. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference [Internet]. Nutrient Data Laboratory: US Government Printing Office. 2015. Available from: http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods.
  28. 28. ProPAN—Process for the Promotion of Child Feeding. Software Version. 2.0 [Internet]. PAHO. 2015 [cited 1 Feb 2016]. Available from: http://www.paho.org.hq/.
  29. 29. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia nomor 1452/Menkes/SK/X/2003 tentang Fortifikasi Tepung Terigu, (2003).
  30. 30. Abebe Y, Bogale A, Hambidge KM, Stoecker BJ, Bailey K, Gibson RS. Phytate, zinc, iron and calcium content of selected raw and prepared foods consumed in rural Sidama, Southern Ethiopia, and implications for bioavailability. J Food Compos Anal. 2007;20(3–4):161–8.
  31. 31. Chan SSL, Ferguson EL, Bailey K, Fahmida U, Harper TB, Gibson RS. The concentrations of iron, calcium, zinc and phytate in cereals and legumes habitually consumed by infants living in East Lombok, Indonesia. J Food Compos Anal. 2007;20(7):609–17.
  32. 32. U.S. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washinton DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
  33. 33. Bognar A. Tables of weight yield of food and retention factors of food constituents for calculation of nutrient composition of cooked foods (dishes). Berichte der Bundesforschung-sanstalt für Ernährung. Karlsruhe: Germany2002.
  34. 34. Bunch S, Murphy SP. User’s Guide to the Operation of the WorldFood Dietary Assessment System, Version 2.0. Berkeley: Office of Technology Licensing: University of California, 1997.
  35. 35. Ferguson EL, Gibson RS, Opareobisaw C, Ounpuu S, Thompson LU, Lehrfeld J. The Zinc Nutriture of Preschool-Children Living in 2 African Countries. Journal of Nutrition. 1993;123(9):1487–96. pmid:8395593
  36. 36. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations University (UNU). Human energy requirements: Report of joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert concultation. Rome: FAO/WHO/UNU, 2001.
  37. 37. World Health Organization (WHO)/Food Agriculture Organization (FAO). Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
  38. 38. World Health Organization. Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries: a review of current scientific knowledge. Geneva: WHO, 1998.
  39. 39. International Zinc Nutrition Consultative G, Brown KH, Rivera JA, Bhutta Z, Gibson RS, King JC, et al. International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group (IZiNCG) technical document #1. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25(1 Suppl 2):S99–203.
  40. 40. Madden JP, Goodman SJ, Guthrie HA. Validity of the 24-hr recall. Analysis of data obtained from elderly subjects. J Am Diet Assoc. 1976;68:143–7. pmid:1245715
  41. 41. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: Part 1 Definitions. Geneva: WHO, 2008.
  42. 42. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: Part 2 Measurement and Part 3 Country Profile. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
  43. 43. Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Report No.6. Calverton, Maryland: 2004.
  44. 44. Working Group of Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators. Developing and validating simple indicators of dietary quality and energy intake of infants and young children in developing countries: summary of findings from analyses of 10 data sets. Washington DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA), FHI 360, 2006.
  45. 45. National Institute of Health Research and Development. Indonesia Basic Health Research 2010. Ministry of Health of Indonesia, 2010.
  46. 46. Marriott BP, White A, Hadden L, Davies JC, Wallingford JC. World Health Organization (WHO) infant and young child feeding indicators: associations with growth measures in 14 low-income countries. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(3):354–70. pmid:22171937
  47. 47. Senarath U, Dibley MJ. Complementary feeding practices in South Asia: analyses of recent national survey data by the South Asia Infant Feeding Research Network. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8 Suppl 1:5–10.
  48. 48. Jones AD, Ickes SB, Smith LE, Mbuya MN, Chasekwa B, Heidkamp RA, et al. World Health Organization infant and young child feeding indicators and their associations with child anthropometry: a synthesis of recent findings. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10(1):1–17. pmid:23945347
  49. 49. Zongrone A, Winskell K, Menon P. Infant and young child feeding practices and child undernutrition in Bangladesh: insights from nationally representative data. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(9):1697–704. pmid:22564370
  50. 50. Mallard SR, Houghton LA, Filteau S, Mullen A, Nieuwelink J, Chisenga M, et al. Dietary diversity at 6 months of age is associated with subsequent growth and mediates the effect of maternal education on infant growth in urban Zambia. J Nutr. 2014;144(11):1818–25. pmid:25332481
  51. 51. Menon P, Bamezai A, Subandoro A, Ayoya MA, Aguayo V. Age-appropriate infant and young child feeding practices are associated with child nutrition in India: insights from nationally representative data. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11(1):73–87. pmid:23557463
  52. 52. Chilenje Infant Growth N, Infection Study T. Micronutrient fortification to improve growth and health of maternally HIV-unexposed and exposed Zambian infants: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11165. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2887362. pmid:20567511
  53. 53. Faber M, Kvalsvig JD, Lombard CJ, Benade AJ. Effect of a fortified maize-meal porridge on anemia, micronutrient status, and motor development of infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(5):1032–9. pmid:16280435
  54. 54. Dewey KG, Adu-Afarwuah S. Systematic review of the efficacy and effectiveness of complementary feeding interventions in developing countries. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4 Suppl 1:24–85.
  55. 55. De-Regil LM, Suchdev PS, Vist GE, Walleser S, Pena-Rosas JP. Home fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders for health and nutrition in children under two years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD008959. pmid:21901727
  56. 56. Jack SJ, Ou K, Chea M, Chhin L, Devenish R, Dunbar M, et al. Effect of micronutrient sprinkles on reducing anemia: a cluster-randomized effectiveness trial. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2012;166(9):842–50.
  57. 57. Malcolm LA. Growth retardation in a New Guinea boarding school and its response to supplementary feeding. Br J Nutr. 1970;24(1):297–305. pmid:5424265
  58. 58. Maulen-Radovan I, Villagomez S, Soler E, Villicana R, Hernandez-Ronquillo L, Rosado JL. [Nutritional impact of whole milk supplemented with vitamins and minerals in children]]. Salud Publica Mex. 1999;41(5):389–96. pmid:11142834
  59. 59. Du X, Zhu K, Trube A, Zhang Q, Ma G, Hu X, et al. School-milk intervention trial enhances growth and bone mineral accretion in Chinese girls aged 10–12 years in Beijing. Br J Nutr. 2004;92(1):159–68. pmid:15230999
  60. 60. Grillenberger M, Neumann CG, Murphy SP, Bwibo NO, Weiss RE, Jiang L, et al. Intake of micronutrients high in animal-source foods is associated with better growth in rural Kenyan school children. Br J Nutr. 2006;95(2):379–90. pmid:16469157
  61. 61. Sazawal S, Dhingra U, Dhingra P, Hiremath G, Sarkar A, Dutta A, et al. Micronutrient fortified milk improves iron status, anemia and growth among children 1–4 years: a double masked, randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12167. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2921413. pmid:20730057
  62. 62. Hoppe C, Molgaard C, Michaelsen KF. Cow's milk and linear growth in industrialized and developing countries. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26:131–73. pmid:16848703
  63. 63. Michaelsen KF. Effect of protein intake from 6 to 24 months on insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, body composition, linear growth velocity, and linear growth acceleration: what are the implications for stunting and wasting? Food Nutr Bull. 2013;34(2):268–71. pmid:23964408
  64. 64. Dewey KG. Nutrition, growth, and complementary feeding of the breastfed infant. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48(1):87–104. pmid:11236735
  65. 65. Kimmons JE, Dewey KG, Haque E, Chakraborty J, Osendarp SJ, Brown KH. Low nutrient intakes among infants in rural Bangladesh are attributable to low intake and micronutrient density of complementary foods. J Nutr. 2005;135(3):444–51. pmid:15735076
  66. 66. Mallard SR, Houghton LA, Filteau S, Chisenga M, Siame J, Kasonka L, et al. Micronutrient Adequacy and Dietary Diversity Exert Positive and Distinct Effects on Linear Growth in Urban Zambian Infants. J Nutr. 2016.
  67. 67. Birch LL, Doub AE. Learning to eat: birth to age 2 y. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2014;99(3):723s–8s. pmid:24452235
  68. 68. Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, et al. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(10):1640–50. pmid:17000197
  69. 69. Working Group of Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators. Developing and validating simple indicators of dietary quality and energy intake of infants and young children in developing countries: additional analysis of 10 data sets. Washington DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA), FHI 360, 2007.
  70. 70. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies. Scientific opinion on nutrient requirements and dietary intakes of infants and young children in the European Union. EFSA J. 2013;11(3408).
  71. 71. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic nutrition recommendations: integrating nutrition and physical activity. Copenhagan, Denmark: 2012.