Figures
Abstract
Virioplankton are an important and abundant biological component of marine and freshwater ecosystems. Often overlooked, aquatic viruses play an important role in biogeochemical cycles on a global scale, infecting both autotrophic and heterotrophic microbes. Viral diversity, abundance, and viral interactions at different trophic levels in aqueous environments are not well understood. Tropical ecosystems are less frequently studied than temperate ecosystems, but could provide new insights into how physical and chemical variability can shape or force microbial community changes. In this study, we found high viral abundance values in Guanabara Bay relative to other estuaries around the world. Viral abundance was positively correlated with bacterioplankton abundance and chlorophyll a concentrations. Moreover, prokaryotic and viral abundance were positively correlated with eutrophication, especially in surface waters. These results provide novel baseline data on the quantitative distribution of aquatic viruses in tropical estuaries. They also provide new information on a complex and dynamic relationship in which environmental factors influence the abundance of bacterial hosts and consequently their viruses. Guanabara Bay is characterized by spatial and seasonal variations, and the eutrophication process is the most important factor explaining the structuring of virioplankton abundance and distribution in this tropical urbanized bay.
Citation: Cabral AS, Lessa MM, Junger PC, Thompson FL, Paranhos R (2017) Virioplankton dynamics are related to eutrophication levels in a tropical urbanized bay. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0174653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174653
Editor: Jiang-Shiou Hwang, National Taiwan Ocean University, TAIWAN
Received: October 4, 2016; Accepted: March 13, 2017; Published: March 31, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Cabral et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by Post-doctoral fellowships to ASC (CAPES Edital Ciências do Mar 09/2009;FAPERJ E 26/103.692/2012;CNPq 158537/2015-7), CNPq Universal grant to RP (483.758/2010-8), CNPq research Fellowship to RP (312.949/2014-6), and FAPERJ APQ1 grants to RP (111.649/2011 and 110.586/2014). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Viruses are the most abundant biological entities on the planet [1–3] and are found in both marine and freshwater ecosystems [4], in and on sediments, in surface waters, and in deep seas [5]. It is currently estimated that global viral abundance (VA) may be as high as 1031 particles [5–7] and that viral activity significantly influences ecosystem structuring [8]. Viral lysis affects the composition and diversity of the microbial communities, suggesting that virioplankton are an important component of the microbial food web [7,9–11]. Nutrients are released during viral lysis and thus redistributed into the water column. The consequent transfer of microbial biomass influences nutrient cycling and alters pathways of organic carbon use by prokaryotes [11] in both natural and anthropogenic environments.
Although the importance of virioplankton in structuring microbial communities is now well recognized, several aspects of this phenomenon are not understood. Some coastal regions have been studied in an attempt to understand the effects of human activity on their ecology [12] and the contribution of viral lysis to the structure of microbial communities [13]. For such studies, precise virus counting is critical for a full understanding of viral roles and interactions within microbial communities [1,14]. Typically in aquatic ecosystems, VA is affected by water quality and host abundance [15–21].
Estuaries are considered to be among the most productive ecosystems in the world [12] because they receive large amounts of allochthonous inputs (natural or anthropogenic). In urbanized estuaries, inputs of human sewage usually results in degradation [22,23]. VA in tropical estuarine regions has seldom been studied, and it is unclear how microbial abundance, water quality parameters, and seasonality relate to VA in tropical estuaries. Among tropical coastal bays, Guanabara Bay (GB) is an important ecosystem, but information regarding its virioplankton has not been published. In the present study we provide original data on viral abundance and distribution, and their relationships with eutrophication patterns. The aim of this study is to investigate to following: (i) how VA is influenced by eutrophication in tropical estuaries; and (ii) The relationships between virioplankton and bacterial and algal hosts. In addition we hypothesize that strong eutrophication in GB is the key factor influencing the structure and functioning of its microbial communities.
Methodology
Study area
Guanabara Bay is a tropical estuarine system located in Rio de Janeiro, which is the second-largest city in Brazil (Fig 1). The bay is chronically polluted and is considered one of the most eutrophicated estuaries in the world [24,25] The main human impacts in the bay are related to sewage discharges, oil pollution, garbage disposal, landfills, deforestation, and mangrove forest destruction. Since the impacts are not uniformly distributed, the bay water quality varies spatially, depending on pollution hotspots, tidal influence, and water circulation patterns [24,26]. Dissolved oxygen and salinity levels are higher in the outermost areas of the bay, towards the open ocean, and the inner bay is heavily polluted, with high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorous compounds, which allow intense phytoplanktonic activity [24]and generally lead to microbial proliferation [27].
Guanabara Bay (GB), located in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Locations marked as BG-01, BG-07, and BG-PQ indicate the sampling sites within the bay (see text for coordinates).
Sampling
Surface and bottom water samples from three sites in GB (22° 50' S, 43° 10' W) were obtained once a month from August 2011 to December 2014. The sampling sites were distributed along the central circulation channel of GB (Fig 1), and were chosen to represent a eutrophication gradient along the bay [24]. Site 01 is located at the entrance to the bay (BG-01: 22° 55' 55" S, 43° 08' 55" W, max depth 35 m), and is affected by ocean water. The second, intermediate, site is located under the Presidente Costa e Silva Bridge (BG-07: 22° 52' 12" S, 43° 09' 41" W, max depth 20 m), which connects Rio de Janeiro city to Niterói city, and the third site, near Paquetá Island (BG-PQ: 22° 46' 18" S, 43° 06' 47" W, max depth 10 m), is affected by river water.
Flow cytometry counts
Samples for VA assessment were fixed onboard with 0.5% glutaraldehyde, followed by freezing in liquid nitrogen, where they were kept until analysis. Samples for heterotrophic bacterioplankton abundance (BA) assessment were fixed onboard (paraformaldehyde 1% + glutaraldehyde 0.05%), followed by freezing in liquid nitrogen, where they were kept until analysis [28]. Aliquots of both VA and BA samples were stained with SYBR Green I (at a final concentration of 5 × 10−5 of the commercial stock solution; Molecular Probes) [29] and analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with a 488 nm argon laser. Distinct virus groups and prokaryotic heterotrophic cells with high (HNA) and low (LNA) nucleic acid content weredetected, indentified and quantified based on their signatures in a plot side scatter (X-axis, related by size) versus green fluorescence (Y-axis, green fluorescence from SYBR Green I related to nucleic acid content). The various autotrophic populations were distinguished using a combination of side scatter light and natural fluorescence (red and orange) issued by photosynthetic pigments [30].
Microbial biomass values were calculated based on carbon conversion factors per cell: 0.08 fg per virus [31] and, for BA, 0.20 fg per cell [32]. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) values were converted to carbon by a factor of 103.9 fg per cell, based on the average conversion factor observed in different parts of the Atlantic Ocean [33].
Physical, chemical, and biological analyses
Physical, chemical, and biological properties were assessed using standard oceanographic methods [34,35]. Water temperature was measured with a YSI 556 multiparameter system. Salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), and pH were evaluated using chlorinity, Winkler azide, and potentiometric methods respectively. Chlorophyll a analyses were performed after vacuum filtration (< 25 cm of Hg). The filters (cellulose membrane Millipore HAWP 0.45 μm) were extracted overnight in 90% acetone at 4°C and analyzed with a UV-VIS Perkin Elmer Lambda 20 spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, USA). Suspended particulate matter determinations were performed by filtration on Millipore AP15 glass-fiber filters. Inorganic nutrients were also analyzed: 1) ammoniacal nitrogen (the sum of N-NH3 + N-NH4+, referred to as ammonia) by indophenol; 2) nitrite by diazotation; 3) nitrate by reduction in a Cd-Cu column followed by diazotation; 4) total nitrogen by digestion with potassium persulfate followed by nitrate determination; 5) orthophosphate by reaction with ascorbic acid; 6) total phosphorous by acid digestion to phosphate; and 7) silicate by reaction with molybdate. Nutrient analyses were performed using a Seal AA3 AutoAnalyzer.
Statistical analysis
We used the software STATISTICA (StatsoftH) to perform a principal component analysis (PCA) based on a correlation matrix of log10-transformed data including total VA, BA, HNA, LNA, Chl a, and abiotic variables. All other analyses were performed using the R Statistical Software (version 3.2.2, <www.r-project.org>) [36]. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used (“glm” function) to test for individual and interactive effects of the two categorical variables, namely sampling station (a three-level fixed factor: BG-01, BG-07, and BG-PQ) and seasonality (a two-level fixed factor: dry and rainy seasons), on the log-transformed response variable VA. All variables (apart from pH) were log10-transformed to meet normality (checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test) and homoscedasticity assumptions. Pearson’s correlations were then conducted to verify relationships among the log10-transformed variables. We performed a model II linear regression using the major axis method (package “lmodel2” [37,38] between the log-transformed virus biomass and prokaryotic biomass data, and between the virus biomass and phytoplankton biomass data, taken from the whole surface dataset. Slopes and intercepts were compared using the “ma” function (package “smatr”) [39,40], which tests hypotheses about slope or elevation (“elev.test”) based on confidence intervals.
Results
VA recorded in the study area ranged from 0.64 × 107 to 48.18 × 107 viruses mL-1. The highest counts were observed at the surface, while the lowest were found in bottom waters (Fig 2A and 2B; Table 1). It was possible to differentiate four different virus groups via flow cytometry (Fig 3A and 3B), as previously described [3,8,41]. They were termed V1, V2, V3, and V4, and were differentiated by their specific increase in fluorescence intensity. Groups V1, V2, and V3 represented, on average, 54%, 32%, and 14% of total VA, respectively. The most abundant group at all depths and sites was V1, which was also the group with the smallest particle sizes (Table 1). All groups exhibited a spatial gradient, with abundance highest in the BG-PQ region (inner bay) and decreasing towards the bay entrance (Fig 2A and 2B; Table 1). Group V4 abundances ranged from undetectable to 0.39 × 107 viruses mL-1. This group was mostly observed in surface waters from the innermost site (BG-PQ), although its abundance was generally very low and represented no more than 2% of total VA at this site.
Note difference in scales between the surface (a, c) and bottom layers (b, d). Symbols are as follows: site BG-01 (full black circle); site BG-07 (empty black circle); site BG-PQ (full black triangle).
Enumeration of (a) virus groups V1, V2, and V3, distinguished according to their green fluorescence (V1 had the lowest fluorescence and V3 the highest), and (b) heterotrophic bacteria and virus group V4.
Grey rows contain data for surface waters and white rows the data for bottom waters.
Seasonal trends were observed in surface waters at all sites (Fig 2A; Table 2). The highest VAs was observed during the summer, and the lowest between May and September (austral winter; Fig 2). This seasonal pattern was independently confirmed through GLM analysis (Table 2), which furthermore confirmed that the effect of seasonality was constant across sampling sites, since there was no interaction between these two factors (Table 2). There was no seasonal effect on VA in bottom waters, however (Fig 2B; Table 2). VAs varied along the estuarine gradient, with highest abundances observed in surface waters close to Paquetá Island (the innermost site) and towards the bay entrance VA decreased (Table 1). With rare exceptions, VA was highest in the inner regions and decreased towards the bay entrance.
Bold p-values indicate a statistically significant effect (p < 0.05).
BA ranged from 0.30 × 106 to 41.28 × 106 cells mL-1, with highest counts observed at surface waters (Fig 2C and 2D; Table 1). Although less abundant than heterotrophic prokaryotic cells, the cyanobacteria Synechococcus exhibited similar distribution patterns at surface waters. As observed for VA, the heterotrophic prokaryotic cells had a stratified distribution along the central channel of the bay. The highest BA (41.28 × 106 cells mL-1) was observed in surface waters at the Paquetá Island site (BG-PQ) during the 2012 rainy season, while the minimum value (0.30 × 106 cells mL-1) occurred in the bay entrance bottom waters in the 2011 dry season. The same spatial pattern was observed with Synechococcus, which decreased towards the coastal waters (Table 1) and had high variability (CV > 220%).
The virus-to-bacteria ratio (VBR) was variable on both spatial and seasonal scales. The mean VBRs increased with the eutrophication gradient: they were higher inside the bay and decreased towards the entrance and cleaner waters (Table 1). There were also seasonal effects: VBRs were higher during the austral winter (June-August), although there were a few exceptions, e.g., an unusually high VBR (42.9) was recorded for the Paquetá Island site bottom waters during summer.
The eutrophication gradients were observed for chlorophyll a (Fig 4) and for all of the microbial plankton indicators we used from the most heavily enriched or polluted site within the bay, towards the less polluted waters closer to the ocean (Table 1). A PCA was used to integrate the microbiological and chemical data, using a matrix with correlation coefficients from 12 variables and 246 observations. The first two components or factorial axes accounted for 57.3% of total data variability (Fig 5). Factor 1 (PC1) explained 36.3% and was positively correlated with water transparency, salinity, and nitrate, and negatively correlated with phytopigments, temperature, silicate, VA, and BA. This axis (Fig 5) effectively separated the sampling sites according to the water quality gradient, represented by the eutrophicated (negative side) and less-polluted, marine-influenced waters (positive side). Therefore it was considered that axis 1 represents the water quality gradient, suggesting that water quality is the most important factor structuring the VA distribution in the study area. Factor 2 (PC2) explained 21.0% of total data variability, and was correlated negatively with dissolved oxygen, and positively with ammonia, nitrite, and orthophosphate. Samples obtained during the rainy season were mainly distributed along the positive side of this axis (data not shown), whereas those from the dry season were on the negative side. Seasonality was thus considered the second-most important factor structuring VA in GB.
Note the different scales for the different sites. Symbols are as follows: chlorophyll a (full black circle); total nitrogen (empty black circle).
The projection is of the 12 variables and 246 samples. Symbols are as follows: BG-01 surface (empty blue circle); BG-01 bottom (full blue circle); BG-07 surface (empty green triangle); BG-07 bottom (full green triangle); BG-PQ surface (empty red square); BG-PQ bottom (full red square). Temp = temperature; Sal = salinity; DO = dissolved oxygen; TP = total phosphorus; TN = total nitrogen; Sil = silicate; Trans = transparency; Chl a = chlorophyll a; VA = viral abundance; BA = bacterial abundance; CA = cyanobacterial abundance; %HNA and %LNA: supplementary variables.
The VA was correlated (Pearson) to the physical and chemical variables for both the surface and bottom samples (Table 3). For the surface samples, it was positively correlated with total phosphorus, total nitrogen, Chl a, and BA, and negatively with salinity. The relationships between VA, prokaryotic cells, and phytoplankton biomass were tested using a Model II linear regression. The steeper slope of the Model II indicates that VA is more dependent on prokaryotic than phytoplanktonic abundance, which reflects the importance of bacteria in host-phage interactions in GB (Fig 6; Table 4).
See Table 4 for confidence intervals.
Discussion
In this study, the VA values observed in GB were among the highest reported for estuarine waters (Table 5). Such VA counts are equivalent to Chesapeake and Moreton bays, and higher than those reported for the Yangtze River, Tampa Bay, and the Charente and Bach Dang estuaries. VA data from the global dataset cited indicate that estuaries are favorable environments for high VA, and that these high counts can be attributed to eutrophication and microbial activity in these environments.
Different methods were used to assess VA: transmission electron microscopy (TEM), epifluorescence microscopy (EFM), and flow cytometry (FCM).
The abundance of all the virus groups followed the same pattern observed for total VA, with highest values reported for the more eutrophic regions of the bay. Group V4 was characterized by a high fluorescence emission. Typically, viruses with high levels of fluorescence emission are associated with algae, and often with eutrophication [8,17]. It is well known that GB is a eutrophic ecosystem [24,25,48], and we found V4 to be most abundant in the most polluted areas, albeit at smaller proportion of the entire virus abundance (max 2%).
Only the surface waters exhibited seasonal changes in virus distribution (Table 1). Indeed, stratification may be more important for structuring virus distribution and abundance in aquatic ecosystems than geographical location [49]. Seasonal temperature changes are less pronounced in tropical estuaries than in temperate estuaries, and there is little difference between summer and winter. Among temperate estuaries, the virus population in Chesapeake Bay (USA) shows clear seasonal trends, despite strong variability across years [12]. However, no seasonal patterns were observed in either the temperate Charente (France) [43] or the tropical Cochin (India) estuaries, and in both these cases there was also no correlation between VA and temperature [44].
It has been reported that eutrophication is the main driver of water quality patterns within GB [24–26]. Our data suggests that eutrophication may also be structuring BA, and consequently VA in this tropical estuary, because it is the main structuring factor identified in the PCA (Fig 5). These findings agree with some VA patterns reported for other estuarine regions globally. Chesapeake Bay there were, surprisingly, no significant differences in VA between sites with different nutrient and salinity concentrations [12], while in Cochin Estuary, VA was explained by bacterial production and correlated with salinity [44]. In the Bach Dang (Vietnam), too, the eutrophication gradient and salinity were considered the main factors shaping picoplankton communities and thus VA [43].
Algae are also potential hosts for viruses; approximately 5% of total VA infects algae [18,20,27,50–52]. Guanabara Bay supports high abundances of several algal groups as a result of eutrophication [24], which results in recurrent algal blooms consisting mostly of flagellated and mixotrophic groups, including potentially harmful species [25]. Despite high phytoplankton numbers, however, the positive correlation of VA with BA and the Chl a concentration of surface samples (Table 3) indicates that at the surface, VA was primarily influenced by the distribution of its main hosts. Furthermore, regression results (Fig 6; Table 4) strongly suggest that VA was more dependent on prokaryotic than phytoplanktonic biomass in GB, so we consider BA the main driver of viral abundance and dynamics in the surface waters of the bay. Winget et al [12] hypothesized that virus dynamics in Chesapeake Bay are linked to host abundance, productivity, grazing pressure, and host composition. In addition, it is estimated that viruses are responsible for 10–60% of bacterial mortality, affecting autotrophic and heterotrophic microbial diversity by controlling the abundance of their hosts [2,44,53–55]. There is thus a complex network of causes and effects in such ecosystems, and there are as yet no clear answers regarding which factors control VA in estuaries, however the present results support the hypothesis that host abundance and nutrient concentrations are more important for determining VA than temperature, salinity, or depth, as postulated by several authors [8,18–20].
The ratio between VA and BA has been used to investigate virus-host relationships [2,27,56]. The VBR was high throughout the year, within GB, but was highest during winter, as observed in other estuaries [12,27]. This suggests that host abundance is not the only factor controlling viral dynamics. For example, during the summer months there is more solar radiation, and temperatures are higher, which may be favorable for bacteria and increase their enzymatic activity [27,57], and possibly virus grazing [58], thereby constraining VA during summer. In addition, during summer, there is more rainfall, which results in an increased abundance of suspended particulates that may adsorb viruses [27]. The one exception to this pattern was in the bottom waters from the most eutrophic sampling site (Paquetá Island; data not shown), where VBR was 26% higher during summer. Experimental results regarding nutrient changes [59–61] show that viral production can be increased by alterations in their hosts’ metabolic processes, such as increasing growth rates following nutrient inputs. However, further investigation is necessary to confirm specific virus-host interactions in GB.
We attribute the variability in viral production primarily to virus-to-host interactions, host biomass, and the effect of environmental factors on host populations. Such effects have also been reported for other ecosystems, such as the Charente Estuary, where BA was the most important predictor of VA, explaining approximately 70% of its variability [20]. It is now well known that microbial morphological diversity and life strategies are highly variable, and consequently their associated viral communities are similarly variable [42,62–64]. Our data therefore suggest that eutrophication is the most important factor structuring viral communities in GB and tropical estuaries in general.
Conclusions
This is the first report on viral abundance in GB (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), where VA counts are among the highest reported globally. A longer time series could confirm the seasonal patterns observed during the present study; however, our three-year data series suggests that VA in the bay is characterized by spatial and seasonal variations related to environmental conditions and anthropogenic impacts. High correlations between the abundance of viruses and their primary hosts (bacteria) in surface waters, suggests that the high eutrophication in GB is the main driver structuring microbial communities. This study thus provides further indication that eutrophication is a key factor in microbial structuring in tropical estuaries.
Supporting information
S1 Appendix. Virus abundance in Guanabara Bay, RJ—Brazil.
Viral abundance of surface and bottom water samples from August 2011 to December 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174653.s001
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to INFRAERO for providing access and logistics for sampling expeditions. This work is a contribution from the “Microbiological Observatory of Rio de Janeiro–MORio”. funded by CNPq (Universal Grant No. 483.758/2010-8, and Research Fellowship Grant No. 312.949/2014-6), and FAPERJ (APQ1 Grant Nos. 111.649/2011 and 110.586/2014) to RP. ASC received fellowships from CAPES (Edital Ciências do Mar 09/2009), FAPERJ (E-26/103.692/2012) and CNPq (158537/2015-7). We are grateful to Dr Andrew Macrae (Institute of Microbiology at UFRJ) for English and content review. Our thanks to the Lab. Hydrobiology team for sampling, and especially to Fernanda R. Ferreira and Anderson A. dos Santos Junior for support in flow cytometry analysis. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: RP.
- Formal analysis: ASC MML PCJ.
- Funding acquisition: ASC RP FLT.
- Investigation: ASC.
- Methodology: ASC.
- Project administration: RP.
- Resources: ASC RP.
- Supervision: ASC RP.
- Validation: ASC.
- Visualization: ASC RP MML PCJ FLT.
- Writing – original draft: ASC RP.
- Writing – review & editing: ASC RP MML PCJ FLT.
References
- 1. Fuhrman JA. Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects. Nature. 1999;399: 541–8. pmid:10376593
- 2. Wommack KE, Colwell RR. Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64: 69–114. pmid:10704475
- 3. Marie D, Brussaard CPD, Thyrhaug R, Bratbak G, Vaulot D. Enumeration of marine viruses in culture and natural samples by flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65: 45–52. pmid:9872758
- 4. Suttle CA. Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5: 801–812. pmid:17853907
- 5. Danovaro R, Dell’Anno A, Corinaldesi C, Magagnini M, Noble R, Tamburini C, et al. Major viral impact on the functioning of benthic deep-sea ecosystems. Nature. 2008;454: 1084–1087. pmid:18756250
- 6. Suttle CA. Viruses in the sea. Nature. 2005;437: 356–361. pmid:16163346
- 7. Rohwer F, Prangishvili D, Lindell D. Roles of viruses in the environment. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11: 2771–2774. pmid:19878268
- 8. Brussaard CPD, Payet JP, Winter C, Weinbauer MG. Quantification of aquatic viruses by flow cytometry. Man Aquat viral Ecol. 2010;11: 102–109.
- 9. Seymour JR, Seuront L, Doubell M, Waters RL, Mitchell JG. Microscale patchiness of virioplankton. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2006;86: 551–561.
- 10. Boras JA, Sala MM, Vázquez-Domínguez E, Weinbauer MG, Vaqué D. Annual changes of bacterial mortality due to viruses and protists in an oligotrophic coastal environment (NW Mediterranean). Environ Microbiol. 2009;11: 1181–1193. pmid:19207563
- 11. Danovaro R, Corinaldesi C, Dell’Anno A, Fuhrman JA, Middelburg JJ, Noble RT, et al. Marine viruses and global climate change. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35: 993–1034. pmid:21204862
- 12. Winget DM, Helton RR, Williamson KE, Bench SR, Williamson SJ, Wommack KE. Repeating patterns of virioplankton production within an estuarine ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 11506–11511. pmid:21709214
- 13. Brussaard CPD, Wilhelm SW, Thingstad F, Weinbauer MG, Bratbak G, Heldal M, et al. Global-scale processes with a nanoscale drive: the role of marine viruses. ISME J. 2008;2: 575–578. pmid:18385772
- 14. Helton RR, Liu L, Wommack KE. Assessment of factors influencing direct enumeration of viruses within estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72: 4767–4774. pmid:16820470
- 15. Jiang SC, Paul JH. Seasonal and diel abundance of viruses and occurrence of lysogeny/bacteriocinogeny in the marine environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1994;104: 163–172.
- 16. Maranger R, Bird DF. Viral abundance in aquatic systems: A comparison between marine and fresh waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995;121: 217–226.
- 17. Brussaard CPD, Marie D, Bratbak G. Flow cytometric detection of viruses. J Virol Methods. 2000;85: 175–182. pmid:10716350
- 18. Hewson I, O’Neil JM, Fuhrman J a., Dennison WC. Virus-like particle distribution and abundance in sediments and overlying waters along eutrophication gradients in two subtropical estuaries. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46: 1734–1746.
- 19. Danovaro R, Armeni M, Corinaldesi C, Mei ML. Viruses and marine pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2003;46: 301–304. pmid:12604062
- 20. Auguet JC, Montanié H, Delmas D, Hartmann HJ, Huet V. Dynamic of virioplankton abundance and its environmental control in the Charente estuary (France). Microb Ecol. 2005;50: 337–349. pmid:16328658
- 21. Knowles B, Silveira CB, Bailey BA, Barott K, Cantu VA, Cobián-Güemes AG, et al. Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;531: 466–70. pmid:26982729
- 22. Cissoko M, Desnues A, Bouvy M, Sime-Ngando T, Verling E, Bettarel Y. Effects of freshwater and seawater mixing on virio- and bacterioplankton in a tropical estuary. Freshw Biol. 2008;53: 1154–1162.
- 23. Winget DM, Wommack KE. Diel and daily fluctuations in virioplankton production in coastal ecosystems. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11: 2904–2914. pmid:19703217
- 24.
Mayr LM, Tenenbaum DR, Villac MC, Paranhos R, Nogueira CR, Bonecker SLC, et al. Hydrobiological characterization of Guanabara Bay. Coastlines of Brazil. 1989; 124–138.
- 25. Fistarol GO, Coutinho FH, Moreira APB, Venas T, Cánovas A, de Paula SEM, et al. Environmental and sanitary conditions of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Front Microbiol. 2015;6: 1–17.
- 26. Paranhos R, Pereira AP, Mayr LM. Diel Variability of Water Quality. Environ Monit Assess. 1998; 131–141.
- 27. Jiao NZ, Zhao YL, Luo TW, Wang XL. Natural and Anthropogenic Forcing on the Dynamics of Virloplankton in the Yangtze River Estuary. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2006;86: 543–550. Available: isi:000237149800012
- 28. Gasol JM, del Giorgio PA. Using flow cytometry for counting natural planktonic bacteria and understanding the structure of planktonic bacterial communities. Sci Mar. 2000;64: 197–224.
- 29. Brussaard CPD. Optimization of Procedures for Counting Viruses by Flow Cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70: 1506–1513. pmid:15006772
- 30.
Marie D, Simon N, Vaulot D. Phytoplankton cell counting by flow cytometry. Algal Culturing Techniques. 2005. pp. 253–267.
- 31. Pan LA, Zhang J, Zhang LH. Picophytoplankton, nanophytoplankton, heterotrohpic bacteria and viruses in the Changjiang Estuary and adjacent coastal waters. J Plankton Res. 2007;29: 187–197.
- 32. Lee S, Fuhrman JA. Relationships between Biovolume and Biomass of Naturally Derived Marine Bacterioplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53: 1298–1303. pmid:16347362
- 33. Le Bouteiller A, Leynaert A, Landry MR, Le Borgne R, Neveux J, Rodier M, et al. Primary production, new production, and growth rate in the equatorial Pacific: Changes from mesotrophic to oligotrophic regime. J Geophys Res. 2003;108: 8141.
- 34.
Grasshoff K, Kremling K, Ehrhardt M. Methods of Seawater Analysis. 1999.
- 35.
Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM. A Manual of Chemical and Biological THE PERGAMON TEXTBOOK. 1984; 173.
- 36.
Team C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Internet]. Vienna, Austria.; 2015. p. www.r-project.org. Available: http://www.r-project.org/
- 37.
Pierre Legendre. lmodel2: Model II Regression. R package version 1.7–2. [Internet]. 2014. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lmodel2
- 38.
Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical Ecology, Volume 24, (Developments in Environmental Modelling) [Internet]. 1998. Available: http://www.citeulike.org/group/15771/article/2574471
- 39. Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S. smatr 3—an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3: 257–259.
- 40. Warton DI, Weber NC. Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometrical J. 2002;44: 161–174.
- 41. Mojica KDA, Evans C, Brussaard CPD. Flow cytometric enumeration of marine viral populations at low abundances. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2014;71: 203–209.
- 42. Bettarel Y, Arfi R, Bouvier T, Bouvy M, Briand E, Colombet J, et al. Virioplankton distribution and activity in a tropical eutrophicated bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2008;80: 425–429.
- 43. Bettarel Y, Bouvier T, Agis M, Bouvier C, van Chu T, Combe M, et al. Viral Distribution and Life Strategies in the Bach Dang Estuary, Vietnam. Microb Ecol. 2011;62: 143–154. pmid:21390531
- 44. Parvathi A, Jasna V, Haridevi KC, Jina S, Greeshma M, Breezy J, et al. Diurnal variations in bacterial and viral production in Cochin estuary, India. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185: 8077–8088. pmid:23532784
- 45. Boehme J, Frischer M, Jiang S, Kellogg C, Pichard S, Rose J, et al. Viruses, bacterioplankton, and phyloplankton in the southeastern Gulf of Mexico: distribution and contribution to oceanic DNA pools. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1993;97: 1–10.
- 46. Tsai AY, Gong GC, Huang YW, Chao CF. Estimates of bacterioplankton and Synechococcus spp. mortality from nanoflagellate grazing and viral lysis in the subtropical Danshui River estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;153: 54–61.
- 47. Jiang SC, Kellogg CA, Paul JH. Characterization of marine temperate phage-host systems isolated from Mamala Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64: 535–542. pmid:9464390
- 48. Gregoracci GB, Nascimento JR, Cabral AS, Paranhos R, Valentin JL, Thompson CC, et al. Structuring of bacterioplankton diversity in a large tropical bay. PLoS One. 2012;7.
- 49. Wommack KE, Ravel J, Hill RT, Chun J, Colwell RR. Population dynamics of Chesapeake Bay virioplankton: total community analysis using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65: 231–240. pmid:9872784
- 50. Bergh O, Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M. High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature. 1989;340: 467–8. pmid:2755508
- 51. Cochlan WP, Wikner J, Steward GF, Smith DC, Azam F. Spatial distribution of viruses, bacteria and chlorophyll a in neritic, oceanic and estuarine environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1993;92: 77–87.
- 52. Corinaldesi C, Crevatin E, Negro P Del, Marini M, Danovaro R, Russo A. Large-Scale Spatial Distribution of Virioplankton in the Adriatic Sea: Testing the Trophic State Control Hypothesis Large-Scale Spatial Distribution of Virioplankton in the Adriatic Sea: Testing the Trophic State Control Hypothesis. 2003;69: 2664–2673. pmid:12732535
- 53. Jacquet S, Heldal M, Iglesias-Rodriguez D, Larsen A, Wilson W, Bratbak G. Flow cytometric analysis of an Emiliana huxleyi bloom terminated by viral infection. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2002;27: 111–124.
- 54. Weinbauer MG, Rassoulzadegan F. Are viruses driving microbial diversification and diversity? Environ Microbiol. 2004;6: 1–11. pmid:14686936
- 55. Jacquet S, Miki T, Noble R, Peduzzi P, Wilhelm S. Viruses in aquatic ecosystems: important advancements of the last 20 years and prospects for the future in the field of microbial oceanography and limnology. Adv Oceanogr Limnol. 2010;1: 97–141.
- 56. Wommack KE, Nasko DJ, Chopyk J, Sakowski EG. Counts and sequences, observations that continue to change our understanding of viruses in nature. J Microbiol. 2015;53: 181–192. pmid:25732739
- 57. Noble RT, Fuhrman J a. Use of SYBR green I for rapid depifluorescence counts of marine virus and bacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol. 1998;14: 113–118.
- 58. Gonzalez JM, Suttle CA. Grazing by marine nanoflagellates on viruses and virus-sized particles: ingestion and digestion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1993;94: 1–10.
- 59. Williamson SJ, Houchin L a, Mcdaniel L, Paul JH. Seasonal Variation in Lysogeny as Depicted by Prophage Induction in Tampa Bay Seasonal Variation in Lysogeny as Depicted by Prophage Induction in Tampa Bay Florida. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68: 4307–4314. pmid:12200280
- 60. Motegi C, Nagata T. Enhancement of viral production by addition of nitrogen or nitrogen plus carbon in subtropical surface waters of the South Pacific. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2007;48: 27–34.
- 61. Payet JP, Suttle CA. To kill or not to kill: The balance between lytic and lysogenic viral infection is driven by trophic status. Limnol Oceanogr. 2013;58: 465–474.
- 62. Painchaud J, Lefaivre D, Therriault JC, Legendre L. Physical processes controlling bacterial distribution and variability in the upper St. Lawrence estuary. Estuaries. 1995;18: 433–444.
- 63. Fisher TR, Rochelle-Newall E. Chromophoric dissolved organic matter and dissolved organic carbon in Chesapeake Bay. Mar Chem. 2002;77: 23–41.
- 64. Troussellier M, Schäfer H, Batailler N, Bernard L, Courties C, Lebaron P, et al. Bacterial activity and genetic richness along an estuarine gradient (Rhone River plume, France). Aquat Microb Ecol. 2002;28: 13–24.